DOCSLIB.ORG

2 F G5268 Uly 0 August 20 01 July 30,|Jubly 20^30U2U 1 2001 C MT W T F C M TW T F 1 2 3 4 5 6 - 12 34

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2 F G5268 Uly 0 August 20 01 July 30,|Jubly 20^30U2U 1 2001 C MT W T F C M TW T F 1 2 3 4 5 6 - 12 34 Julyi 27," 2001 Julhy 2001 August2001 M TW T F_ SM TWTF 5 1 2 34 567 1 2 3 4- 8 91011121314 5 6 7 8 91011 .rnday -15 16 17 18 19 20 21 . 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 29 30 31- 26 27 28 29 30 31 TaSk ad '_ .__________________0 _Getthe most out of Outook 98 - 800 900 1000_ _ 10:47am-11:02am Welcome to Calendar! - . 1100 2 _ 100 Notes 200 30o 4 oo 500 6 o Kipo i, 6 Knpowicz, Robert 1 DE039.Q136 2 F g5268 uly 0 August 20 01 July 30,|JUBly 20^30U2U 1 2001 c MT W T F C M TW T F 1 2 3 4 5 6 - 12 34. 4londay 8 91011 121314 5 6 7 8 91011 -15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 - 2223 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2930 31 26 27 28 29 30 31 TaskPad 7 ~~~~~~am7 "~'~~ 0_ Q3 TOTaskdad 7___________________________ the mosoutof Outlook98 1 000 DOE's concers re National Pipeline Mapping System/Stacey Gerard, Office of Pipeline J -___---- 31 __-___________________________________________L'- - 11°J0 l2Pm 000 L__ ___w__ . -R 500 _ .5 - K6 1--00p 1 =------- Knrpowicz, Robert 1 DOE039-0137 51029 21569 July2001 August 2001 J3ulyJuly i331, 200llZ 0 :L! . Mq.T W T F 5 M; &WiS 1 2 3 4 5 6~ 123 4 Tuesday 8 91011121314 s 6 7 8 91011 Tuesda'~~ ~ ~ ~~Iy -15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18- 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 31 TaskPad _ 1 am' D TaskPad 7 0a Get the most out of Ottook 98 8 00r ~ r- 10°°" I - - 12 m 1 00 l:lOpm Van will be ready for Raybum Bldg/Escalators on G level (confirred by Lee on FY 2002 Conference Issues Briefing/Loretta Beaumont, Kolevar, Sheets (Rayburnm _ B308) ._ _ _Notes 2 00 300 400 _6 5 00Knpo,Robert _ _ _L03 _ I 5 Kripowicz, Robert 1 - -0138 2 7O0 275 70 ~~~~A01,,ugust 2001 ost~g 2001 o September 2001 lAugust 01, 2001 cM TW TF _ MTW T f__ 1 234 1- 5 6 7 8 91011 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Vednesday -12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 1011 12 13 14 15 19 2021 22 2 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 26 27 28 29 30 31 - 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 .._ ~ . TaskPad 7 amnD _ TaskPad ______________________ 0 Get the most out of Outook 98 I00 i -00 1 00 .: 12 | 00 Dave Garman, ASEE/Alaska Clean Coal Project Notes ___ 2 00 IGCC/Unda Stuntz; James Sevinsky; Joel Chalfin, GE; Matthew Tanzer 3 00 Pre-brief/SPR mtg. on 8/2-Furiga, cast of 1000s 400 --5500 - - -- - - 600 Knpowicz, Robet 1 DOE039-0139 21X5171 AP»ug uBst 02,1 20 ^01 August 2001 September 2001 1August 02, 2001 SMTWT F SMTWTFS2345678 |Thursdayl._j_ US ZUU1 2 3~4 L ursday 5 6 7 8 910 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 -12131415161718 91011121314 15- 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 - 1617 18192021 22 262728 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 TaskPad 7 am 1 _)_TaskPad !___________________________________________7 Get the most out of Outiook 98 300 Mike Jacobs/Speech prep for Hoiston trip 900~ io_1"'__ ........., IClris Freitas 1 00 Nancy Johnson I - 00° Follow-up on 7/13 Itr fro mim Houck-Energy Strategy/Jeff Seabright, Texaco; BillBresr 12pm ~00 i__ F~~~~~~~~_ _ . No te s 2 00 SPR Organization, Performance Measures & Oppt for Improvement/DepSec, Furiga, st of 1000s (7B-252, DepSec conf rm) 3 00 400 500 6°°0 Knpowicz, Robert 1 DOE039-0140 2'SM72 27-72 ^BB^««Rffus~t>f&'"&3,~"^tf^~ ~August 2001 September 2001 lAugust 03, 2001 cMTWT _M T WT F 1 2 3W4 1- nriday 5 6 7 8 91011 2 3 4 5 6 78 -12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 - 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 __. I 3 *m *. s TaskPad s 7 ____et the most outof Ouook 98 8 00 900 ---.-_ . Briefing re Mictey LeWand events/Faith Oine, Dottie Fowikes 10 00 Janet Sena, TECO Energy Inc, Tampa, FL/Intro meeting 00F_______________________________ i1:50am Car-escalator-1000 Water St . 12 pm Charles Fntts,AGA & Charlie Estes (LeRivage) 00 l1:05pm Car-return to DOE Notes 2Notes00, ________ 300 __ BLOCK-BOB K. OUT 400 500 iKtnpowac Robert 1 D0WE039-O141 2'f ~73 Knpowicz, Robert I DOE039-0141 2 f'~ 3 BAugust August 2001 September 2001 August 06, 2001 cM TW T F M TWF 1 2 3 -~ 1 londay 5 6 7 8 91011 2 3 4 5 678 2 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 1112 13 14 15 - 19 202122 2324 25 16 1718 19 20 2122 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 TaskPad 74amiD iTaskPad _ i__ .________________Get0 the most out of Outlook 98 0 lAlaska updateluckett, Tomaszewsi 900 iI__,___. _, ___,___ 10°° __I _ _ _ _ _ 12i - 100 ICurrent Status of 3adcsonvile Electic Prject &Intro mtg./Frank Kelleher, Tracy Da Notes 300 400 ~ 500 6°oo ripowobert DE039-014 Kripowicz, Robert 1 DOE039-O 142 S ,2,)5//s ~~August~~~~~, 260%"%^August ^***^>& 2001 September 2001 C"MHWH- ___ lAugust|AU9U$. 0707, 2001 c.M TW T FcS c M TW T F._ 1234 3 Tuesday 56 7 89 10 11 2345 6 7 8 -12 1314 15 16 17 18 - 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 192021 22 23 24 25 161718 19 20 21 22 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 _____ J TaskPad - am7aiBLOCK-Morgantown Cl ITaskPad 0 Get Mthe most ot of Outook 98 - 800 _. *S 900 - \- 1100 100 Notes 300 400 600 Krpowicz, Robert 1 DE039-0143 2 75 2T5'75 August 2001 September 2001 TW T F-1- T - -5 |August 08, 2001 1 2 3,4 M Wednesday 6 7 8 91011 2 3 4 5 6 7 8- 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 - 910 11 12 13 14 15 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 -T.l twel gTadskPadIN; J asD 7 amBLOcK - Bob inDenver TaskPad et the most out of Outlook 98- -OO 12. Notes 300 40 00 ~o 00 6"00 Kripow, Robert 1 DOE039-0144 2 ft76 y 21- st09, 200f August 2001 September 2001 [August 09,fA"9 ZOO12001 09, - _________cIO!M T2W'T0Fl-' W T F - T M W. Thursday 5 6 7 8 91011 2 3 4 5 6 7 8- 12131415 16 17 18 9101112131415 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 TaskPad 7yam DC TaskPad 7_ 0 Get the most out of Outlook 98 00 900 1000 00 12 m 00 Mickey Leland Luncheon/Awards Ceremony (1E-245) Notes 200 3 00 Critical Infrastructure Policy (CIP)lPaula Scalingi, Ira Stem 400 TAPING/Energy Standards Board (GE-098) 500 S:15pm-6:15pm Cean Coal Power Initiative Strategy & Investment Strategy/Bruce Carnes, Walter Howes, David Berg, Andy Paterson (4A-253) 6 00 6:30am - 7:00am When Bob arrive, call George Rudins immediately.He has what Bob needs to start the meeting. Kripowiz, Robert 1 DOE039-0145 2 'E 77 iBAuguste 10,ItqlAugust 200 2001 Septembe 2001 lAugust 10, 2001 SM T WT - MT W F ~FnI.day I1 2 3 4 1 Friday 5 6 7 8 91011 2 3 4 5 6 7 8- 12 13 14 15 16 17.18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 19 20 21 22 23 24 25- 16 17.18 19 20 21 22 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ *TaskPad '______ _________________________________________________i ) _IGet the most out of Outlook 98 II13 1_)Rl.'r__ 80 g 00 Mickw-LelandlGesing Session (6E-069) 10o8000i 1 00 F~ {t2pm 1 00 BRENT/farewell (4G-084 conference room) Notes 200 2:00pm-2:45pm Interview/Mary Ann Lavelle, US News & World News-Clean Coal (Dre 2 Malcomb) 300 6°0 -- j- -- ___________ IL---________DE039-0146 Knpowicz, Robert DE039-0146 27579 lAugust I~~~~au13,16~~~3,~ g~~ust 20012 1Augst W2001T F- CTWTFCSepember 2001 12 3 4 I - Monday 6 7 8 9011 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 13 14 15 16 17 8 - 910 11 121314 15 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 26 27 28 29 30 31 - 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 TaskPad im. 2 iTaskPadm D agg~BLOCOK- Bob in Pittsburgh Getemostoutof Outlook 98 200 9 00 . _______Notes 3 00 00 5-- 6 00 Kripowiz, Robe 1 DOE039-0147 45072 27579 August 2001 Septembe 2001 __ [August 14,au9ust 2;00200184, < Mi T W T F-A-- M TW T F ~~~~~~~Tuesday Y ~1234 Tuesday _ 6 7 8 91011 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 - 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 -_:.:~~ - - .S ~~TaskPad.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2005 Annual Report American Physical Society
    1 2005 Annual Report American Physical Society APS 20052 APS OFFICERS 2006 APS OFFICERS PRESIDENT: PRESIDENT: Marvin L. Cohen John J. Hopfield University of California, Berkeley Princeton University PRESIDENT ELECT: PRESIDENT ELECT: John N. Bahcall Leo P. Kadanoff Institue for Advanced Study, Princeton University of Chicago VICE PRESIDENT: VICE PRESIDENT: John J. Hopfield Arthur Bienenstock Princeton University Stanford University PAST PRESIDENT: PAST PRESIDENT: Helen R. Quinn Marvin L. Cohen Stanford University, (SLAC) University of California, Berkeley EXECUTIVE OFFICER: EXECUTIVE OFFICER: Judy R. Franz Judy R. Franz University of Alabama, Huntsville University of Alabama, Huntsville TREASURER: TREASURER: Thomas McIlrath Thomas McIlrath University of Maryland (Emeritus) University of Maryland (Emeritus) EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: Martin Blume Martin Blume Brookhaven National Laboratory (Emeritus) Brookhaven National Laboratory (Emeritus) PHOTO CREDITS: Cover (l-r): 1Diffraction patterns of a GaN quantum dot particle—UCLA; Spring-8/Riken, Japan; Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lab, SLAC & UC Davis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 085503 (2005) 2TESLA 9-cell 1.3 GHz SRF cavities from ACCEL Corp. in Germany for ILC. (Courtesy Fermilab Visual Media Service 3G0 detector studying strange quarks in the proton—Jefferson Lab 4Sections of a resistive magnet (Florida-Bitter magnet) from NHMFL at Talahassee LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT APS IN 2005 3 2005 was a very special year for the physics community and the American Physical Society. Declared the World Year of Physics by the United Nations, the year provided a unique opportunity for the international physics community to reach out to the general public while celebrating the centennial of Einstein’s “miraculous year.” The year started with an international Launching Conference in Paris, France that brought together more than 500 students from around the world to interact with leading physicists.
    [Show full text]
  • Fusion Energy: `Yes We Can' by Laurence Hecht Editor-In-Chief, 21St Century Science & Technology January 11, 2009
    Fusion Energy: `Yes We Can' by Laurence Hecht Editor-in-chief, 21st Century Science & Technology January 11, 2009 John Nuckolls, former director of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, has proposed a 10-year strategy for achieving laser fusion, which he said could be accomplished with 10 percent of President-elect Obama's $150-billion projected energy program. The contents of Dr. Nuckolls' proposal addresses issues of science not well-known to today's general public, but which should be better known. In laser fusion, a tiny target of deuterium, sometimes combined with tritium, is compressed by a shock wave which is produced by focused laser beams. The shock causes the deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen present in seawater, and tritium to combine, forming a nucleus of helium and a neutron. The mass of the resulting helium nucleus is less than the component nuclei, and the mass difference is released as energy, according to the famous equation E = mc2. The energy release per fusion is several times greater than that produced by the fission of a uranium nucleus, which is millions of times greater than the energy released by burning of a molecule of oil or natural gas. The heat of fusion energy can thus drive electrical turbines with far greater efficacy than any known power source, and can also be utilized in a device known as the fusion torch, to break down raw ore and even garbage into its constituent elements. Dr. Nuckolls, who led research on laser fusion at the national laboratory for many years, proposed "four steps to fusion power." (1) build an efficient high-average power laser module, a factory for producing laser targets, and a fusion chamber; (2) build a surged, heat capacity inertial fusion energy system; (3) build a fusion engine; (4) build a fusion power plant.
    [Show full text]
  • To Ignition to Ignition
    ON THE PATH TO IGNITION 10 S&TR March 2013 National Ignition Campaign National Ignition Facility experiments produce new states of matter as scientists close in on creating the conditions required to ignite fusion fuel. MONG the most challenging scientific closer to achieving ignition and fulfilling A quests over the past 50 years has the vision of early fusion pioneers such as been the international effort to create, in former Laboratory Director John Nuckolls. a laboratory setting, a miniature “star on Shortly after the laser’s invention in 1960, Earth.” The goal of this endeavor is to Nuckolls conceived of using the x rays surpass the extreme mix of temperature, generated by a powerful laser pulse to fuse density, and pressure at the center of the hydrogen isotopes, convert matter into Sun and generate conditions in which energy (as in Einstein’s famous equation, hydrogen fusion reactions can start and E = mc2), and thereby liberate more energy sustain themselves, thus creating a fusion than is delivered by the laser pulse. fire in the laboratory. The ongoing fusion “NIF was designed to be the world’s reaction in the Sun’s center provides largest laser,” says NIF chief scientist John all the energy needed for life on Earth. Lindl. “In fact, it now operates as such. Replicating this sustained reaction in a We have known from the outset that the laboratory requires conditions that are even energy it delivers does not give us a large more extreme: temperatures in the tens of margin of performance to achieve ignition. millions of degrees, pressures hundreds Everything that occurs during the implosion of billions of times Earth’s atmosphere, of hydrogen fuel must be nearly perfect.” and a density of burning matter that is Lindl notes that significant progress has more than 100 times the density of lead.
    [Show full text]
  • Plasma Physics Section 2
    Section 2 Plasma Physics Chapter 1 Plasma Dynamics. 153 154 RLE Progress Report Number 131 Chapter 1. Plasma Dynamics Chapter 1. Plasma Dynamics Academic and Research Staff Professor George Bekefi, Professor Abraham Bers, Professor Bruno Coppi, Professor Miklos Porkolab, Professor Jonathan S. Wurtele, Dr. Kuo-in Chen, Dr. Shien-Chi Chen, Dr. Thomas Dupree, Dr. Ronald C. Englade, Dr. Stanley C. Luckhardt, Dr. Stefano Migliuolo, Dr. Abhay K. Ram, Dr. Linda Sugiyama, Ivan Mastovsky Visiting Scientists Paolo Detragiache,' Vladimir Fuchs, 2 Lazar Friedland,3 Dr. Chaim Leibovitch, 4 Dr. Kongyi Xu5 Graduate Students Ala Alryyes, Ricardo Betti, Carson Chow, Stefano Coda, Jeffrey A. Colborn, Manoel E. Conde, Christian E. de Graff, Anthony C. DiRienzo, Robert J. Kirkwood, Kenneth C. Kupfer, Yi-Kang Pu, Jared P. Squire, Richard E. Stoner, Jesus N.S. Villasenor Undergraduate Students Daniel P. Aalberts, George Chen, Salvatore DiCecca, Marc Kaufman, Weng-Yew Ko, Nora Nerses, Kurt A. Schroder 1.1 Relativistic Electron Project Staff Beams Professor George Bekefi, Professor Jonathan S. Wurtele, Manoel E. Conde, Christian E. de Sponsors Graff, Richard E. Stoner, Anthony C. DiRienzo, Daniel P. Aalberts, Salvatore Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory DiCecca, Dr. Kongyi Xu, Dr. Chaim (Subcontract 6264005) Leibovitch, Ivan Mastovsky, Dr. Shien-Chi National Science Foundation Chen (Grants ECS 84-13173 and ECS 85-14517) U.S. Air Force - Office of Scientifc Research 1.1.1 Coherent, Free-Electron (Contract AFOSR 84-0026) Radiation Sources U.S. Army - Harry Diamond Laboratories (Contract DAAL02-86-C-0050) The primary objective of the group is to U.S. Navy - Office of Naval Research develop a basic experimental and theoretical (Contract N00014-87-K-2001) understanding of coherent generation by free electrons for wavelengths in the 1 um to 10 cm range.
    [Show full text]
  • ITER Review Panel Members
    APPENDIX A REVIEW TEAM MEMBERS, AND MEETINGS A.1 ITER Review Panel Members Prof. Robert W. Conn (Chairman)* Dean and Walter J. Zable Professor, School of Engineering University of California, San Diego Dr. David Baldwin Senior Vice President General Atomics Dr. Richard J. Briggs* Senior Program Manager SAIC Prof. James D. Callen* Kerst Professor of Nuclear Engineering & Engineering Physics and Physics University of Wisconsin Prof. Robert Goldston Associate Director for Research of PPPL and Professor of Astro-Physical Sciences, Princeton University Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Prof. Richard D. Hazeltine * Director of the Institute for Fusion Studies, and Professor of Physics University of Texas, Austin Dr. Richard E. Siemon Fusion Energy Program Manager Los Alamos National Laboratory Dr. Tony S. Taylor * Senior Technical Advisor and Group Leader, Stability General Atomics *Also FESAC member APPENDIX A 1 A.2 ITER Review Sub-Panel Members Sub-Panel I. Physics Performance, Projections, Experimental & Theoretical Basis, Global Scaling Dr. Tony S. Taylor (Co chairman)* Senior Technical Advisor and Group leader, stability General Atomics Dr. William Tang (Co chairman) Principal Research Physicist, head, Theory Division Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Prof. Glen Bateman Professor of Physics Lehigh University Dr. Keith Burrell Senior Technical Advisor General Atomics Dr. Vincent Chan Director, Core Physics General Atomics Prof. Lui Chen Professor of Physics and Astronomy University of California, Irvine Dr. Steven Cowley Professor of Physics and Astronomy University of California, Los Angeles Dr. Patrick Diamond Professor of Physics University of California, San Diego Dr. William Dorland Research Associate, Institute for Fusion Studies University of Texas, Austin Dr. James Drake Professor of Physics, Laboratory for Plasma Research University of Maryland APPENDIX A 2 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • NIF, an Unexpected Journey
    NIF: An Unexpected Journey and Lessons Learned to Secure “Projects of Scale” LLNL Seminar Mike Campbell July 9, 2020 1 Outline History is important: Look forward but learn from the past • LLNL ICF Program History – “100× Campaign” (compressing DT to ~20 g/cm3 as a focus) • Past research programs with lessons to be learned – X-ray laser program (“Star Wars”) • National Ignition Facility – background – technical approach – “political” approach • Lessons for future large-scale facilities 2 LLNL ICF Program History* Nova laser at LLNL ____________ * Any inaccuracies are mine 3 The 1970s was a decade of laser building at LLNL culminating in the planned construction of Nova • Janus (two beams at ~100 J/beam) first LLNL neutrons! (KMS was first!) • Argus (two beams ~1000 J/beam) ~first modern laser architecture • Shiva (20 beams at 500 J/beam) radiation-driven ablative implosions to high density • Nova (20 beams at 12 kJ/beam) ignition and gain All lasers Nd:Glass with 흀 = 1 흁m with “unconditioned” laser beams on target. 4 The LLNL (NIF) main fusion approach is laser- produced x-ray drive (“indirect drive”) Target design and temporally tailored drive pulse produce an assembled fuel configuration –1/2 • Pign ~(Efuel) What was the motivation? • NIF has achieved ~350 Gbar • Alpha heating of fuel demonstrated (~55 kJ) 5 In the 1970s direct drive faced many scientific challenges Direct-drive target “Unsmoothed laser beam Shell breakup with high (R/횫R) • Direct-drive issues 훾t – hydrodynamic instabilities: A(t) = A0 e – A0: “seeds” for Rayleigh–Taylor
    [Show full text]
  • Plasma Science and Fusion Center
    Plasma Science and Fusion Center Overview MIT’s Plasma Science and Fusion Center (PSFC) is known internationally as a leading university research center for the study of plasma and fusion science and technology with research activities in five major areas: 1. The science of magnetically confined plasmas in the development of fusion energy, in particular the Alcator C-Mod tokamak project. 2. The basic physics of plasmas including magnetic reconnection experiments on the Versatile Toroidal Facility (VTF), plasma-surface interactions, development of novel high-temperature plasma diagnostics, and theoretical plasma physics and fusion science research. 3. The physics of high-energy-density plasmas, including the center’s activity on inertial confinement laser-plasma fusion interactions. 4. The physics of waves and beams (gyrotron and high gradient accelerator research, beam theory development, nonneutral plasmas, and coherent wave generation). 5. A broad program in fusion technology and engineering development that addresses problems in several areas (e.g., magnet systems, superconducting materials, and system studies of fusion reactors), as well as non-fusion-related technology development, mostly in the superconducting magnet area. Administratively, each of these areas constitutes a separate research division. In order of research area above, PSFC’s research divisions are the Alcator Project, Physics Research, High-Energy-Density Physics (HEDP), Waves and Beams, and Fusion Technology and Engineering. Similarly, MIT’s Francis Bitter Magnet Laboratory (FBML) is internationally recognized for its advances in several areas of science and engineering involving high magnetic fields, including research in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The lab also is also active in NMR and MRI magnet development and in nanoscience condensed matter physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Opportunities in the Fusion Energy Sciencesprogram
    Summary of Opportunities in the Fusion Energy Sciences Program Prepared by the Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee For the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy SUMMARY OF OPPORTUNITIES IN THE FUSION ENERGY SCIENCES PROGRAM November 1999 Prepared by the Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee for the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Panel * Charles C. Baker, University of California, San Diego Stephen O. Dean, Fusion Power Associates † N. Fisch, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Jeffrey P. Freidberg,* Massachusetts Institute of Technology Richard D. Hazeltine,* University of Texas G. Kulcinski, University of Wisconsin John D. Lindl,* Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Gerald A. Navratil,* Columbia University Cynthia K. Phillips,* Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory S. C. Prager, University of Wisconsin D. Rej, Los Alamos National Laboratory John Sheffield,* Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Coordinator J. Soures, University of Rochester R. Stambaugh, General Atomics R. D. Benson, ORNL Support J. Perkins, LLNL Support J. A. Schmidt, PPPL Support N. A. Uckan, ORNL Support * Member of FESAC. † Ex-Member of FESAC. ii Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee 1998–1999 Members Dr. Charles C. Baker, University of California, San Diego Dr. Richard J. Briggs, Science Applications International Corporation Dr. Robert W. Conn, University of California, San Diego Professor Jeffrey P. Freidberg, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dr. Katharine B. Gebbie, National Institute of Standards and Technology Professor Richard D. Hazeltine, University of Texas at Austin Professor Joseph A. Johnson III, Florida A&M University Dr. John D. Lindl, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Dr. Gerald A. Navratil, Columbia University Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliography of Publications By, and About, Edward Teller
    A Bibliography of Publications by, and about, Edward Teller Nelson H. F. Beebe University of Utah Department of Mathematics, 110 LCB 155 S 1400 E RM 233 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090 USA Tel: +1 801 581 5254 FAX: +1 801 581 4148 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (Internet) WWW URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/ 17 March 2021 Version 1.177 Title word cross-reference + [KT48, TT35a]. $100 [Smi85b]. $12.95 [Edg91]. $19.50 [Oli69]. $24.95 [Car91]. $3.50 [Dys58]. $30.00 [Kev03]. $32.50 [Edg91]. $35 [Cas01b, Cas01a]. $35.00 [Dys02a, Wat03]. $39.50 [Edg91]. $50 [Ano62]. − 7 $8.95 [Edg91]. = [TT35a]. [BJT69]. [CT41]. 2 [SST71, ST39b, TT35a]. 3 [HT39a]. 4 [TT35a]. 6 [TT35a]. β [GT36, GT37, HS19]. λ2000 [MT42]. SU(3) [GT85]. -Disintegration [GT36]. -Mesons [BJT69]. -Transformation [GT37]. 0 [Cas01b, Cas01a, Dys02a]. 0-7382-0532-X [Cas01b, Cas01a, Dys02a]. 0-8047-1713-3 [Edg91]. 0-8047-1714-1 [Edg91]. 0-8047-1721-4 [Edg91]. 0-8047-1722-2 [Edg91]. 1 [Har05]. 1-86094-419-1 [Har05]. 1-903985-12-9 [Tho03]. 100th 1 2 [KRW05, Tel93d]. 17.25 [Pei87]. 1930 [BW05]. 1930/41 [Fer68]. 1939 [Sei90]. 1939-1945 [Sei90]. 1940 [TT40]. 1941 [TGF41]. 1942 [KW93]. 1945 [Sei90]. 1947 [Sei90]. 1947-1977 [Sei90]. 1948 [Tel49a]. 1950s [Sei90]. 1957 [Tel57b]. 1960s [Mla98]. 1963 [Szi87]. 1973 [Kur73]. 1977 [Sei90]. 1979 [WT79]. 1990s [AB88, CT90a, Tel96b]. 1991 [MB92]. 1992 [GER+92]. 1995 [Tel95a]. 20 [Goe88]. 2003 [Dys09, LBB+03]. 2008 [LV10]. 20th [Mar10, New03d]. 28 [Tel57b]. 3 [Dic79]. 40th [MKR87]. 411-415 [Ber03b].
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility of Inertial-Confinement Fusion
    On October 15, 1981, John H. Nuckolls this article has occurred because of the received the American Physical Society's dedication and inspiration of John Maxwell Prize for outstanding contribu­ Nuckolls and his colleagues at LLNL, as tions to plasma physics. The citation read well as of hundreds of researchers else­ "For his contributions to the genesis and where in the United States and other na­ progress of inertial confinement fusion. tions. In addition to their work, consistent His insight into the fundamental physics support for the U.S. Inertial Fusion Pro­ issues has served to guide and inspire the gram has been provided by the Depart­ technical evolution of the field." An article ment of Energy and its predecessors and based on his Maxwell lecture to the Soci­ by the Congress of the United States. This ety was published in Physics Today (Sep­ support has led, in 10 years time, to an ef­ tember 1982). Because of the interest that fort with the accomplishments and scope readers of the En ergy and Technol ogy described in this article. It should be fur­ Review could have in John's views on ther noted that, although the thrust of this John's views on inertial confinement fusion, the editors article is directed toward the long-range power-potential of the En ergy and Technology Review have agreed to re­ of the Inertial Fusion Program, current support and print the article in this issue. The work described in nearer-term goals are defense related. Feasibility of Inertial­ Confinement Fusion "We can see no insurmountable roadblocks to th e practi­ temperatures sufficient to cause the hy­ cal achievement of electrical power generated by in ertial­ drogen nuclei to fuse, releasing an confinement fusion ..
    [Show full text]
  • James Clerk Maxwell Prize for Plasma Physics John Dawson Award For
    The DPP Chronicle Atlanta, Georgia A Division of The American Physical Society November 2-6, 2009 James Clerk Maxwell Prize John Dawson Award Marshall N. Rosenbluth Job Fair Sponsored by APS-DPP for Plasma Physics for Excellence in Plasma Outstanding Doctoral Monday, November 2 “For pioneering investigations of linear Physics Research Thesis Award 10:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. and nonlinear plasma waves and wave- "For revolutionary, non-invasive “For the first simultaneous measurements particle interactions; fundamental spectroscopic techniques to measure of long-wavelength electron temperature Tuesday, November 3 contributions to the development of magnetic fields in dense plasmas and for and density fluctuations in the core of 10:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. plasma heating, current drive and resolving in detail in space and time the a high-performance tokamak plasma, Hanover AB diagnostics; and leadership in promoting implosion phase of the Z pinch." demonstrating larger than expected plasma science education and domestic temperature fluctuations; and for (Interviews to be held in Edgewood, and international collaborations.” Yitzhak Maron comparison of this data with nonlinear Atlanta Conference Center Level) Weizmann Institute of Science Miklos Porkolab gyrokinetic simulations.” The Job Fair is the best place to connect Massachusetts Institute of Technology Yitzhak Maron Anne White, with employers and job seekers from received his Ph.D. General Atomics all areas of plasma physics, beams and Education: BASc, in Physics from coherent radiation, inertial confinement and University of British the Weizmann Dr. Anne White high-energy-density plasmas, and more. Columbia,1963; Institute of received her Attendees are encouraged to visit the P h.D., Stanford Science in B.S.
    [Show full text]
  • UCRL-LR-107454: Assessment of the Safety of US Nuclear Weapons And
    Fvl+- UCRL-LR-I07454I Report to Congress: Assessment of the Safety of u.S. Nuclear Weapons and Related .c\ Nuclear Test Requirements ,.., R. E. Kidder July 26, 199'::1 '1 Contents Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Principal Meansof Providing NuclearWarhead Safety 2 One-PointSafety : 3 NuclearPlutonium SafetyDispersal Safety 3 SafetyStandards for NuclearWeapons 3 ComparativeSafety of U.S. NuclearWeapons 3 The Minuteman Missiles 5 The Trident Missiles 5 Fire-ResistantPits 5 SeparableComponents 6 Responseto Congressmens'Questions 6 Summaryand Conclusions 10 Recommendations 12 References 12 AbbreviationsUsed 13 Appendix A. Letter from Edward M. Kennedyto JohnNuckolls A-l Appendix B. Letter from Les Aspin to the HonorableJames D. Watkins B-l Appendix C. Nuclear SafetyCriteria C-l Appendix D. SafetyStandards for NuclearWeapons D-l Appendix E. A Summaryof AccidentsInvolving U.S. NuclearWeapons and Nuclear WeaponsSystems E-l AppendixF. Biography F-l iii Report to Congress: Assessment of the Safety of U.S. ~ Nuclear Weapons and Related Nuclear Test Requirements Abstract.The principal safety features included in the design of modern nuclear weapons are described briefly, and each nuclear weapon currently in the stockpile or under development is given a comparative safetyI rating from "A" through "D," indicating the extent to which these safety features are included in its design. The list is then narrowed by deleting weapons currently scheduled for retirement and short-range, surface-to-surface tactical nuclear weapons that will likely be returned to the U.S. and placed in storage. With the exception of the Minuteman and Trident ballistic missile warheads, all warheads in this projected future stockpile will have both of the most important design features that contribute to nuclear weapon safety: enhanced electrical isolation (EEl) and insensitive high explosive (IHE).
    [Show full text]