2017-2018 UIL 2 Social Media

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2017-2018 UIL 2 Social Media 1 UIL LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE RESEARCH SERIES VOL. 23 SPRING 2018 NO. 2 RESOLVED: THE USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA AS A NEWS SOURCE UNDERMINES THE MARKETPLACE OF IDEAS. There can be little doubt that the motivation for choosing this topic is the controversy surrounding the phenomenon of “fake news” and its impact on the 2016 presidential election and beyond, but the topic invites discussion of numerous other issues as well. The growth of social media has been breathtaking over the past two decades. Julie Seaman, professor of law at the Emory University School of Law, describes this growth in a Winter 2016 article in the Arizona State Law Journal: “The Internet's takeover of the global communication landscape was almost instant in historical terms: it only communicated 1% of the information flowing through two-way telecommunications networks in the year 1993, already 51% by 2000, and more than 97% of the telecommunicated information by 2007. Facebook was created in 2004; it currently has 1.7 billion monthly active users. This sea change has transformed society and changed the way people think about and interact with the world and with each other. (p. 1013). The focus of the Spring 2018 topic, however, is more specifically on the news sharing function of social media. That function too has experienced dramatic growth. Joel Timmer, professor of digital media at TCU, reports on a survey indicating that 44% of U.S. adults now say they get their news from Facebook (Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2017, p. 672). The question raised by the Spring 2018 topic is not precisely about whether this use of the social media as a news source is good or bad. More specifically, the topic asks whether such use is undermining the “marketplace of ideas.” The “marketplace of ideas” is usually associated with philosophical writings in the late Renaissance. But Nima Darouian, writing in the Cardozo Public Law, Policy, and Ethics Journal, claims that the notion actually started with the ancient Greeks: While the "marketplaces of ideas" theory is commonly attributed to John Milton and John Stuart Mill, the actual practice began with Socrates. It was in the Athenian Agora that Socrates would meet with people to debate ideas through a process of asking questions, and then questioning the answers, until a general agreement could be reached. The speech of Socrates in a literal marketplace of ideas was a speech that challenged the life of the community. It was Milton's Areopagitica (1644) and Mill's On Liberty (1869), however, that provided the theoretical predicate for the metaphor Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes introduced in his dissent in Abrams v. United States (1919): But when men have realized that time has upset many fighting faiths, they may come to believe even more than they believe the very foundations of their own conduct that the ultimate good desired is better reached by free trade in ideas - that the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market, and that truth is the only ground upon which their wishes safely can be carried out. That, at any rate, is the theory of our Constitution. It is an experiment, as all life is an experiment. ANALYSIS OF THE TOPIC As you will recall from The Value Debate Handbook, every proposition of value consists of two components: the object(s) of evaluation and the evaluative term. The object(s) of evaluation is that which is being evaluated or critiqued in the resolution. The evaluative term is the word or phrase in the resolution that is evaluative in nature. This resolution contains two objects of evaluation: “use of social media as a news source” and “the marketplace of ideas.” The evaluative term/phrase is “undermines.” Debaters should take note of the fact that the Spring 2018 resolution does not ask for an evaluation of whether the “marketplace of ideas” is a good or bad thing. The resolution does not call for an assessment of whether the “marketplace of ideas” is just or advances the common good; the question is whether the “marketplace of ideas” is undermined by the “use of the social media as a news source.” Accordingly, debaters are called upon to decide what kind of properties are contained in the “marketplace of ideas” and then debate about whether the “use of social media as a news source” undermines or supports those properties. What is meant by the term, “social media?” Debaters will be able to name numerous examples of the digital services that are commonly called “social media” – Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Snapchat, Instagram, Flickr, etc. Arriving at a non-example-based definition of “social media” is a bit more difficult, but there is an official government definition that 2 can provide a starting place. Rachel Vanlendigham, writing in the October 2017 Cardozo Law Review, provides this definition: “The U.S. Department of Homeland Security defines social media as ‘web-based and mobile technologies that turn communication into an interactive dialogue in a variety of online fora.’ The technologies' architecture provides numerous benefits to their users: massive exposure to a large audience, anonymity, ease of publication both technically and in cost, and speedy content dissemination. The companies that maintain and provide such technologies, often referred to as social media platforms, consist of private corporations such as Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, and Instagram; such services allow us to connect with family and friends and interesting events from around the world. Image and video sharing websites such as Flickr, Instagram, and YouTube are also considered as falling within the social media rubric” (LexisNexis Academic). The following paragraphs illustrate the effort of numerous authors to provide definitions of “social media” for the purpose of their own books or articles: Daniel Joyce, (Prof., Law, U. of New South Wales), Intercultural Human Rights Law Review, 2013, p. 233. In this article, I am primarily focused on the news-generative forms of digital media and the information networks of social media, such as Facebook and Twitter. But it would be a mistake to view 'social media' only in terms of certain platforms with current popularity. Social media can be seen as a dimension of new forms of digital media including "websites and applications that enable users to create and share content or to participate in social networking." The term 'new media' conveys a sense of the ability to broadcast in digital media beyond the traditional categories of radio, newspaper or television and to do so instantly and to a global audience 'online.' Amy Cattle, (JD), Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, Winter 2016, at Note 3. The term "social media" as used throughout this Note will draw from the definition put forth by Hunsinger and Swift [in the Social Media Handbook], referring to "networked information services designed to support in-depth social interaction, community formation, collaborative opportunities and collaborative work." Michelle Zappavigna, (Postdoctoral Fellow, Linguistics, U. Sydney, Australia), Discourse Of Twitter and Social Media, 2012, 2. Social media is an umbrella term generally applied to web-based services that facilitate some form of social interaction or 'networking'. This includes websites where the design-principle behind the service is explicitly about allowing users to create and develop online relationships with 'friends' or 'followers'. The term also encompasses platforms where the focus is on generating and sharing content, but in a mode that allows comment and, potentially, collaboration. Sarah Joseph, (Prof., Law, Monash U.), Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, Winter 2012, 146. Social media is defined as "a group of Internet-based applications that build on the ideological and technological foundations of Web 2.0, and that allow the creation and exchange of User Generated Content." "Web 2.0" refers to Internet platforms that allow for interactive participation by users. What is the significance in the resolution of the phrase, “as a news source?” Social media serves many purposes, only one of which involves keeping up with current events. Other purposes, of course, include sharing personal or family pictures, describing the minutia of one’s daily activities, sharing a favorite recipe, or just keeping up with the activities of friends. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines “news” as “a report of recent events” or “previously unknown information” (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/news). The Longman Dictionary defines “news” as “information about something that has happened recently” (https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/news). “Source” is defined by the Oxford-English Dictionary as “a place, person, or thing from which something originates or can be obtained” (https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/source). While the contextual phrase, “news source” is very commonly used in the literature, finding a definition of the entire phrase is very difficult. There are numerous surveys attempting to measure the extent to which persons turn to social media as a source of news; the most prominent such survey is conducted annually by the Pew Research Center (http://www.journalism.org/2017/09/07/news-use-across- social-media-platforms-2017/). The 2017 survey concludes that “more than half (55%) of Americans ages 50 or older report getting news on social media sites. That is 10 percentage points higher than the 45% who said so in 2016. Those under 50, meanwhile, remain
Recommended publications
  • House of Cards Aids Typhoon Victims
    'House of Cards' team organizing aid for typhoon victims - baltimoresun.com http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/tv/z-on-tv-blog/bal-house-of-... www.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/tv/z-on-tv-blog/bal-house-of-cards--aid-typhoon-victims- 20131115,0,7088713.story Donations accepted through Wednesday in Baltimore area By David Zurawik The Baltimore Sun 8:00 PM EST, November 15, 2013 With filming for Season 2 completed last week, members of the team making "House of Cards" in advertisement Baltimore are focusing their energies on helping the victims of Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines. Through Wednesday, workers on the show will be loading donated goods onto a tractor trailer that will be driven to Los Angeles and shipped to the Philippines, according to Rehya Young, assistant locations manager for the Netflix series produced by Media Rights Capital. "We'll be accepting donations until Wednesday, Nov. 20, which will give us time to pack the truck properly and get it to L.A. on time," said Young. The truck will be parked at the show's offices in Edgewood, MD. Those who think they might have something to donate can email Young: [email protected]. She will provide directions or make arrangements if the donor cannot transport the items. The "House of Cards" team is co-ordinating its relief efforts with Operation USA, which will be shipping the goods from Los Angeles to the Philippines. Those who want to make a financial donation through Operation USA can do so here. Several area businesses and unions that work with and on the series have already made contributions, according to Young.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Broadband Public Interest Standard
    University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 2009 Toward a Broadband Public Interest Standard Anthony E. Varona University of Miami School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles Part of the Communications Law Commons, and the Law and Society Commons Recommended Citation Anthony E. Varona, Toward a Broadband Public Interest Standard, 61 Admin. L. Rev. 1 (2009). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Deans at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 2009 Toward a Broadband Public Interest Standard Anthony E. Varona Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles Part of the Communications Law Commons, and the Law and Society Commons ARTICLES TOWARD A BROADBAND PUBLIC INTEREST STANDARD ANTHONY E. VARONA* TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................. 3 1. The Broadcast Public Interest Standard ............................................ 11 A. Statutory and Regulatory Foundations ...................................... 11 B. Defining "Public Interest" in Broadcasting .......................... 12 1. 1930s Through 1960s-Proactive Regulation "to Promote and Realize the Vast Potentialities" of B roadcasting .................................................................. 14 a. Attempts at Specific Requirements: The "Blue Book" and the 1960 Programming Statement ........... 16 b. More Specification, the Fairness Doctrine, and Noncommercial Broadcasting ................................... 18 c. Red Lion BroadcastingCo.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Perspectives of African American Culture and Representation in the Works of Ishmael Reed
    ALTERNATIVE PERSPECTIVES OF AFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURE AND REPRESENTATION IN THE WORKS OF ISHMAEL REED A thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of Zo\% The requirements for IMl The Degree Master of Arts In English: Literature by Jason Andrew Jackl San Francisco, California May 2018 Copyright by Jason Andrew Jackl 2018 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read Alternative Perspectives o f African American Culture and Representation in the Works o f Ishmael Reed by Jason Andrew Jackl, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Master of Arts in English Literature at San Francisco State University. Geoffrey Grec/C Ph.D. Professor of English Sarita Cannon, Ph.D. Associate Professor of English ALTERNATIVE PERSPECTIVES OF AFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURE AND REPRESENTATION IN THE WORKS OF ISHMAEL REED Jason Andrew JackI San Francisco, California 2018 This thesis demonstrates the ways in which Ishmael Reed proposes incisive countemarratives to the hegemonic master narratives that perpetuate degrading misportrayals of Afro American culture in the historical record and mainstream news and entertainment media of the United States. Many critics and readers have responded reductively to Reed’s work by hastily dismissing his proposals, thereby disallowing thoughtful critical engagement with Reed’s views as put forth in his fiction and non­ fiction writing. The study that follows asserts that Reed’s corpus deserves more thoughtful critical and public recognition than it has received thus far. To that end, I argue that a critical re-exploration of his fiction and non-fiction writing would yield profound contributions to the ongoing national dialogue on race relations in America.
    [Show full text]
  • Woody Paige: Conservative John Fox Brings Broncos to Their Knees
    Woody Paige: Conservative John Fox brings Broncos to their knees Woody Paige The Denver Post January 12, 2013 The cold, hard fact is the Broncos lost everything Saturday. And they blew it. They lost the overtime coin toss. They lost a cinch victory with 31 seconds left in the fourth quarter by blowing coverage. They lost the game on an intercepted pass late in the fifth quarter. They lost the playoff game early in the sixth quarter on a 47-yard field goal. They lost their chance at a ninth AFC championship game. They lost the opportunity for the franchise to win a third Super Bowl. Peyton Manning lost the prospect of playing a Super Bowl in his hometown of New Orleans and winning a second NFL championship. The Broncos lost the lead four times. They lost two interceptions and a fumble, all Manning turnovers. They lost a dozen arguments with the officials. They lost a rare home playoff game. The Broncos lost everything from the regular season in one historic postseason game. In a frozen conundrum on a Dr. Zhivago kind of day, in the chilliest and longest playoff game in Denver history, Ravens 38, Broncos 35. Rather than Holliday, Hillman and the Hallelujah High Way, it was to Hades in a Handbasket. Everybody shares the blame, but coach John Fox should get more than his share for his conservative approach. After the Ravens shocked a bitterly cold crowd with a 70-yard balloon bomb from Joe Flacco to Jacoby Jones, with just over half a minute to go, to tie the game for the fifth time, at 35-35, the Broncos had the ball at their 20-yard line, had two timeouts and had the quarterback who had produced more winning drives in the fourth quarter than anybody else who ever played the game.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridgewell Recuperative Care Center Needs Care Construction Begins On
    THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2020 Moulton rolls out his agenda By Gayla Cawley ITEM STAFF SALEM — After cruising to an easy re-election win Tuesday night, U.S. Rep. Seth Moulton chose to fo- cus his remarks during a late Wednesday morning press conference on the importance of counting every vote in a tight presi- dential race. Moulton, a Democrat from Salem, will represent the 6th Congressional Dis- trict for another two years after defeating John Paul Moran by a 30-point mar- gin. ITEM PHOTO | SPENSER HASAK Speaking outside the Old Town Hall, Moulton crit- STEVE KRAUSE icized President Donald COMMENTARY Trump for the “shameful display of anti-Democrat- ic behavior” he displayed Pollsters’ favorability rating tumbles when he appeared in the White House shortly after For decades, I’ve watched weather one of those high-visibility pollsters tion, the reputation of the polling 2 a.m. Wednesday to de- forecasts on TV and recited the old today? How would you like to be go- out ts is just shot. They are useless. clare himself as the win- cliche that “oh, it must be great to be ing into your boss’ of ce to explain Those of us who aren’t exactly fans ITEM PHOTO | SPENSER HASAK ner of the election and in- in a profession where you get paid how you had ahead Joe Biden up by of Trump (guilty!) are permanently sist that votes should stop for being wrong half the time.” nine points, or that you had predict- scarred after 2016, when we were Congressman Seth being counted.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture of Lies Understanding Fake News & Its Spiritual Ramifications
    Culture of Lies Understanding Fake News & Its Spiritual Ramifications Timothy Zebell CreateSpace Publisher Culture of Lies Copyright © 2019 by Timothy Zebell. Unless otherwise indicated, all Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version, copyright ©2001 by Crossway Bibles, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved. ISBN-9781693873225 Imprint: Independently Published Contents _____________________ 1. The State of Our Media ................................................................ 1 2. The President’s Fake News Awards ................................... 11 3. A Culture of Lies ....................................................................... 25 4. The Anatomy of Fake News .............................................. 51 5. Three Types of Fake News ....................................................... 65 6. A Long History of Fake News .......................................... 85 7. Fake Polls & Fake Fact-Checkers ............................................. 97 8. Fake Hate ......................................................................... 115 9. The Growing Threat of Censorship ....................................... 125 10. When Fake News Becomes a Culture of Lies ................ 139 Appendix A – Further Details of Examples Used .............. 149 Appendix B – Additional Examples of Fake News in the Era of Trump: 2016 .............................................. 157 Appendix C – Additional Examples of Fake News in the Era of Trump: 2017 .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimore Reporters Do Some Fine TV Storytelling on Sandy
    Baltimore reporters do some fine TV storytelling on Sandy Lowell Melser report highlights risk in bearing witness to storm By David Zurawik 7:46 AM EDT, October 30, 2012 After 14 hours of watching Sandy storm coverage, I am convinced that no one deserves more praise than the reporters and camerapersons on the ground in places like Ocean City. I know in these snarky, all-you-need-is-irony, postmodern times, lots of folks, including some journalists who should know better, like to make fun of TV reporters standing in high winds and driving rain or snow to report on a storm. I could not disagree more. The image of a correspondent being pounded by the elements is as crystal-clear an objective correlative for the core role of journalism as I can imagine. I want someone out there on the edge of the ocean and the tip of the storm bearing witness to the power of nature -- and reporting on the danger the storm portends for the rest of us back in our homes. Yes, there are wall-to-wall fools and hotdogs working at TV stations. In fact, some might say there are far more of them than serious journalists. But I have not seen many hotdogs or fools out in the storm in my 14 hours of watching Baltimore TV coverage of the storm today. I've mainly seen hardworking folks trying to get the story their editors sent them out to get -- and doing it even as they get soaked by a cold, hard rain and brutal winds.
    [Show full text]
  • Under the Shadow Oftuskegee: African Americans and Health Care
    Under the Shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and Health Care Vanessa Northington Gamble, MD, PhD Introduction foundation for today's pervasive sense of black distrust ofpublic health authorities."6 On May 16, 1997, in a White House The syphilis study has also been used to ceremony, President Bill Clinton apolo- explain why many African Americans gized for the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, the oppose needle exchange programs. Needle 40-year government study (1932 to 1972) exchange programs provoke the image of in which 399 Black men from Macon the syphilis study and Black fears about County, Alabama, were deliberately genocide. These programs are not viewed denied effective treatment for syphilis in as mechanisms to stop the spread of order to document the natural history of HIV/AIDS but rather as fodder for the drug the disease.' "The legacy of the study at epidemic that has devastated so many Tuskegee," the president remarked, "has Black neighborhoods.7 Fears that they will reached far and deep, in ways that hurt our be used as guinea pigs like the men in the progress and divide our nation. We cannot syphilis study have also led some African be one America when a whole segment of Americans with AIDS to refuse treatment our nation has no trust in America."2 The with protease inhibitors.8 president's comments underscore that in The Tuskegee Syphilis Study is fre- the 25 years since its public disclosure, the quently described as the singular reason study has moved from being a singular behind African-American distrust of the historical event to a powerful metaphor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fate of Public Broadcasting in the Face of Federal Funding Cuts
    THE FATE OF PUBLIC BROADCASTING IN THE FACE OF FEDERAL FUNDING CUTS Patricia M. Chuh 7 The 104th Congress has vowed to cut government tions, are at stake. funding for the arts and humanities.' The Corpora- This Comment examines the Congressional debate tion for Public Broadcasting ("CPB") which distrib- over whether to continue government funding of utes federal funds to the Public Broadcasting Service, public broadcasting in today's economic and techno- National Public Radio, and directly to local public logical climate. Part I discusses public broadcasting's broadcasting stations is a primary target.' Public purpose. Part II sets forth an historical background broadcasting's funds were first threatened when the of public broadcasting. Part III examines the pri- new Republican House Speaker, Newt Gingrich, mary arguments for cutting federal funding of public announced his intentions to abolish federal funding broadcasting and the counter-arguments asserted by of public broadcasting.' the supporters of continued government subsidies. The decision whether Congress will discontinue fi- Part IV analyzes the results of funding cuts on the nancing the CPB was first played out in the House CPB as well as the effects on the small public broad- of Representatives where the House approved budget casting stations it supports. Finally, this Comment cuts for the CPB for 1996 and 1997." The Senate concludes that federal funding for the Corporation restored some of the House's proposed budget cuts.' for Public Broadcasting should be continued due to Even though cuts in appropriations were not as the need for the educational and the cultural pro- devastating as feared, the final decision to slash the gramming provided by public broadcasting.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 ) In the Matter of ) ​ ) Application of Sinclair Broadcast ) MB Docket No. 17-179 Group and Tribune Media Company ) ​ For Consent to Assign or Transfer ) ​ Control of Licenses and Authorizations ) ​ ) PETITION TO DENY OF FREE PRESS Dana J. Floberg Richelle M. Crotty Matthew F. Wood Free Press 1025 Connecticut Ave, NW Suite 1110 Washington, DC 20036 202-265-1490 August 7, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Introduction 4 Statement of Interest 5 Sinclair’s Acquisition of Tribune Would Not Serve the Public Interest 6 A. The Proposed Transaction Would Violate the Duopoly Rule in Twelve Markets 7 B. Applicants Did Not Disclose the Existence of Two Overlap Markets in Their Application to the Commission 9 C. The Proposed Transaction Would Exceed the National Audience Reach Cap 17 D. The Proposed Transaction Would Harm Local Communities, Particularly Communities Of Color 20 E. Sinclair Fails to Demonstrate Affirmative Public Interest Benefits 26 CONCLUSION 37 Exhibit A: Declarations of Craig Aaron, Mary Tuma, Stephen Barker, James Rinnert, Denis Moynihan, ​ Anthony Shawcross, Julie Kay Johnson, Russell James Martin, Michele (Shelly) Ann Silver, Weldon Frederick Wooden, Ernesto Aguilar, Nicholas Shoemaker, Thomas H. Klammer, Susan Lacerda Stupy, Meg Amelia Riley, Henry Fernandez, Manolia Charlotin, Andrew Glass, Joann Hill, Rosalind Schneider, Jonathan Rintels, Desiree Hill, Steven P. Hunt, Hannah Jane Sassaman, Christine Quigley, Mary Kathryn Taylor, Sue Wilson, William Steven Child, Steve Gevurtz, Seena Seward, Bev Hovda, and Ken Hovda. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Federal Communications Commission should deny the assignment of licenses from Tribune Media Company to Sinclair Broadcast Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Individual Disruptors and Economic Gamechangers: Netflix, New Media
    12 Individual Disruptors and Economic Gamechangers: Netfix, New Media, and Neoliberalism Gerald Sim In many ways television is being disrupted in a dramatic way and Netfix is a perfect example of that. Ken Auletta, Charlie Rose, January 29, 2014 In the fnal week of January 2014, Netfix’s stock price surged an incredible 21 percent on news in the company’s quarterly earnings report that the service had added more than 4 million new subscribers worldwide.1 Tose shares grew by another 36 percent over the next month. It represented a stark turnaround from a pricing and public relations debacle approximately two years earlier, when an unwelcome price increase amid plans to charge customers separately for its “Netfix Instant” streaming service incurred the wrath of subscribers and investors. Netfix aborted the idea, but was forced to claw its way out of a sustained nightmarish period when it lost customers and the faith of market watchers. But claw its way out it did, which was refected in both its latest news and forecasts of future business. Two weeks later, Ken Auletta, media writer for Te New Yorker, published a 6,100-word article titled “Outside the Box: Netfix and the Future of Television,” documenting Netfix’s major role in slaying Blockbuster Video, popularizing mobile platforms of media consumption, and radically altering the television business.2 Auletta promoted the story with an appearance on the Charlie Rose show. Much of what he reported in the magazine can be gleaned from various industry studies undertaken in various quarters over the last decade3; Auletta’s account, however, rubberstamped by the imprimatur of Rose’s late- night sobriety, is noteworthy.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: the Simpsons, Satire, and American Culture
    Notes Introduction: The Simpsons, Satire, and American Culture 1. Robert J. Thompson, Television’s Second Golden Age: From Hill Street Blues to ER (New York: Continuum, 1996), 19. 2. “Simpsons Roasting on an Open Fire” (#7G08) ranked thirtieth for its timeslot the night it premiered and earned Fox a 22 percent share and a 14.5 rating. See “Nielsens,” USA Today, December 20, 1989, 3D, Lexis-Nexis Academic, October 2, 2003. 3. “Bart the Genius” (#7G02) ranked forty-eighth for its timeslot and earned Fox a 19 percent share and a 12.7 rating. See “Nielsens,” USA Today, January 17, 1990, 3D, Lexis-Nexis Academic, October 2, 2003. 4. Harry F. Waters, “Family Feuds,” Newsweek, April 23, 1990, 58. 5. Although The Simpsons often ranked within the top ten for weekly or monthly Nielsen totals, the show has not ranked high overall: at the end of the 1989–90 season, its first full season on the air, The Simpsons ranked only thirtieth. See “Final Season Ratings,” Electronic Media, April 23, 1990, 36, Lexis-Nexis Academic, October 2, 2003. http:// web.lexis-nexis.com/universe. Curiously, the show has never been among the top 25 in the Nielsen seasonal totals. It is no longer the ratings juggernaut it once was, but new episodes of The Simpsons still rank in the Nielsen top 50 among prime-time television shows and often in the top 20 among shows in syndication. Tim Brooks and Earle Marsh, The Complete Directory to Prime Time Network and Cable TV Shows, 1946–Present, 8th ed. (New York: Ballantine, 2003), 1073–74.
    [Show full text]