Pens and Needles: Women's Textualities in Early Modern England

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pens and Needles: Women's Textualities in Early Modern England Pens and Needles ................. 17732$ $$FM 05-05-10 11:53:01 PS PAGE i MATERIAL TEXTS Series Editors Roger Chartier Leah Price Joseph Farrell Peter Stallybrass Anthony Grafton Michael F. Suarez, S.J. A complete list of books in the series is available from the publisher. ................. 17732$ $$FM 05-05-10 11:53:02 PSPAGE ii Pens and Needles Women’s Textualities in Early Modern England O Susan Frye University of Pennsylvania Press Philadelphia · Oxford ................. 17732$ $$FM 05-05-10 11:53:02 PS PAGE iii Copyright ᭧ 2010 University of Pennsylvania Press All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations used for purposes of review or scholarly citation, none of this book may be reproduced in any form by any means without written permission from the publisher. Published by University of Pennsylvania Press Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4112 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Frye, Susan, 1952– Pens and needles : women’s textualities in early modern England / Susan Frye. p. cm. — (Material texts) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8122-4238-6 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Arts, English—16th century. 2. Arts, English—17th century. 3. Material culture—Social aspects—England. 4. Women—England—Social conditions. 5. Art and society—England—History—16th century. 6. Art and society—England—History—17th century. I. Title. NX543.F79 2010 704Ј.0420942—dc22 2010004563 ................. 17732$ $$FM 05-05-10 11:53:02 PSPAGE iv For Lizzie ................. 17732$ $$FM 05-05-10 11:53:02 PS PAGE v ................. 17732$ $$FM 05-05-10 11:53:02 PSPAGE vi Contents O List of Illustrations ix Note on Spelling xiii Preface xv Introduction 1 Chapter One. Political Designs: Elizabeth Tudor, Mary Stuart, and Bess of Hardwick 30 Chapter Two. Miniatures and Manuscripts: Levina Teerlinc, Jane Segar, and Esther Inglis as Professional Artisans 75 Chapter Three. Sewing Connections: Narratives of Agency in Women’s Domestic Needlework 116 Chapter Four. Staging Women’s Relations to Textiles in Shakespeare’s Othello and Cymbeline 160 Chapter Five. Mary Sidney Wroth: Clothing Romance 191 Notes 223 Selected Bibliography 267 Index 291 Acknowledgments 299 ................. 17732$ CNTS 05-05-10 11:53:05 PS PAGE vii ................. 17732$ CNTS 05-05-10 11:53:05 PSPAGE viii Illustrations O Figures 1. Artist unknown, Alice Barnham and her Sons Martin and Steven, c. 1557 17 2. Attributed to Jan van Belkamp, The Great Picture of the Clifford Family,c.1649 22 3. Elizabeth Tudor, embroidered binding, The Glass of the Sinful Soul, 1544 34 4. Hans Holbein, ‘‘HISA’’ cipher, c. 1533–35 35 5. Elizabeth Tudor, embroidered binding, Calvin’s Institution Chre´tienne, 1545 36 6. Elizabeth Tudor to Edward VI, autograph letter dated only Hatfield 15 May 38 7. Artist unknown, Elizabeth When a Princess, 1546 or 1547 42 8. After Franc¸ois Clouet, Mary Queen of Scots in White Mourning, 1560 47 9. Countess of Shrewsbury, after 1569 62 10. Virgil Solis, Diana and Actaeon, 1563 64 11. High Great Chamber with pastoral frieze, 1590s 67 12. Bess of Hardwick, Chastity as Mary Queen of Scots, 1570s 69 13. Mary Queen of Scots, An Unicorne, 1570s 70 14. Attributed to Levina Teerlinc, An Elizabethan Maundy,c.1565 82 ................. 17732$ ILLU 05-05-10 11:53:07 PS PAGE ix 15. Jane Segar, dedication to Elizabeth I, The Prophecies of the Ten Sibills upon the Birth of Christ, 1589 88 16. Jane Segar, concluding poem and transcription in charactery, The Prophecies of the Ten Sibills upon the Birth of Christ, 1589 94 17. Esther Inglis, self-portrait, Le Livre de l’Ecclesiaste, 1599 109 18. Esther Inglis, ‘‘Vive la Plume!’’ Cinquante Octonaires, 1607 111 19. Martha Edin, pincushion in Irish stitch, c. 1670–80 124 20. Hannah Smith, message placed in her embroidered cabinet, 1657 134 21. Gerard de Jode, Abraham’s Dismissal of Hagar, 1585 143 22. The Judgment of Solomon, 1640–70 146 23. Maker’s initials M I, Esther and Ahasueras, 1665 148 24. Detail of Judith and her maidservant with the head of Holofernes, first half of the seventeenth century 158 25. Geertruid Roghman, Two Women Sewing, 1600 161 26. Gabriel Metsu, The Huntsman’s Present, 1658–60 166 27. Pieter de Hooch, Interior with Two Women at a Linen Chest,c.1663 174 28. Simon de Passe, Portrait of Mary Sidney Herbert, Countess of Pembroke, 1618 201 29. Simon de Passe, title page, The Countess of Montgomery’s Urania, 1621 203 30. Professional embroidery, the Bradford Table Carpet, 1600–1615 (detail) 214 31. Sophonisba Anguissola, Autoritrato in miniatura,c.1556 216 Plates Following page 140 1. Mary Queen of Scots, possibly with Bess of Hardwick, ‘‘Las Pennas Passan y Queda la Speranza,’’ 1570s 2. Mary Queen of Scots, ‘‘Virescit Vulnere Virtus,’’ 1569–71 3. Bess of Hardwick, Penelope Flanked by Perseverans and Paciens, 1570s xIllustrations ................. 17732$ ILLU 05-05-10 11:53:08 PSPAGE x 4. Bess of Hardwick, Lucrecia Flanked by Chasteti and Liberaliter, 1570s 5. Bess of Hardwick, Diana and Actaeon, 1570s 6. Attributed to Levina Teerlinc, ‘‘The Ceremonye for the heling,’’ c. 1553–58 7. Jane Segar, The Prophecies of the Ten Sibills upon the Birth of Christ, 1589 (back cover) 8. Esther Inglis, Argumenta Psalmoru Davidis, 1608 9. Jane Bostocke, earliest known English spot sampler, 1598 10. Margret Mason, band sampler, 1660 11. Hannah Smith, cabinet front, Deborah and Barak; Jael and Sisera, 1654–56 12. Hannah Smith, embroidered cabinet, 1654–56 13. Maker’s initials S C, David and Bathsheba, 1661 or 1681 14. Domestic needleworker, Susanna and the Elders,c.1630–60 15. Domestic needleworker, Abraham Casting Out Hagar and Ishmael,c.1650 16. Book cover, Abraham Banishes Hagar and Ishmael, 1652 17. Mirror frame, Abraham Banishes Hagar and Ishmael, 1660–80 18. Maker’s initials I H, Esther and Ahasueras, 1652 19. Mirror frame showing King Charles II, Queen Catherine of Braganza, Judith, and Jael, c. 1665 20. Purse embroidered with grapes, vines, flowers, and small animals, c. 1600–1650 21. Tapestry with the arms of Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester, c. 1585 Illustrations xi ................. 17732$ ILLU 05-05-10 11:53:08 PS PAGE xi ................. 17732$ ILLU 05-05-10 11:53:08 PSPAGE xii Note on Spelling To make this work more accessible for the nonspecialist, I have silently modernized the early modern spelling and capitalization of nonliterary texts only. I have also modernized u/v, i/j, and i/y, while replacing long s with the modern s and completing abbreviations. ................. 17732$ SPEL 05-05-10 11:53:12 PS PAGE xiii ................. 17732$ SPEL 05-05-10 11:53:12 PSPAGE xiv Preface O Decades of scholarly work on early modern English women have expanded our sense of their lives and of the media that they used to express those lives, media that I call women’s textualities. Early modern modes of perception made wom- en’s verbal and visual textualities seem closely related, even versions of one another. As a result, this book considers women’s writing alongside their paint- ings and embroidery. Through their multiple textualities, I argue, women from about 1540 to 1700 expressed themselves in several media that also record the ongoing redefinition of the feminine. Women’s textualities took many forms in early modern England. As activi- ties, they may be placed along a continuum, from those that provide very little information about their producers to those that provide a great deal of informa- tion. Surviving forms of women’s textualities include notes in samplers, alpha- bets both stitched and penned, initials, ciphers, wise sayings, and embroidery patterns, all of which offer glimpses of women’s activities and perceptions. Still other textualities, including calligraphic manuscripts with embroidered covers and needlework pictures, pamphlets, as well as the texts now classified as litera- ture, offer more substantive information about the connections that women saw between themselves and their texts. Whether providing only traces or whole treatises of information, women’s textualities materialize their creators’ identi- ties as situated within familial, intellectual, religious, and historical traditions, even as they used those traditions to redefine themselves. To some producers of early modern texts we can attach names, including privileged women like Elizabeth Tudor, Mary Stuart, Bess of Hardwick, Anne Clifford, Margaret Hoby, Mary Sidney Herbert, and Mary Sidney Wroth. Other women who wrote, painted, or worked textiles include those more at the periphery of power, like Levina Teerlinc, Jane Segar, Esther Inglis, and Amelia Lanyer. Still other women’s names are largely unknown, their existence regis- tered only by the needlework that they left behind and by their choice of narra- tives. Both the nameable and the anonymous women who produced a variety of ................. 17732$ PREF 05-05-10 11:53:16 PS PAGE xv texts led lives that were engaged with economic, political, religious, and material changes within their society—changes that encouraged both literacy and needle- work among members of the middling classes. The objects that register their subjectivities—whether the products of educated, literate women or the prod- ucts of the less privileged—offer the rare opportunity to access lives that might otherwise be lost. At the same time, attending to the products of both pens and needles presents an alternative way to read the canonical literature of the period, including William Shakespeare’s Othello and Cymbeline, and Mary Sidney Wroth’s Urania. The Introduction opens with the evidence that early modern people often saw the products of women’s pens and needles as interrelated, a way of concep- tualizing the combined media present in epitaphs, dedications, diaries, educa- tional treatises, and commonplace books.
Recommended publications
  • The Misfortunes of Arthur and Its Extensive Links to a Whole Range of His Other Shakespeare Plays
    FRANCIS BACON AND HIS FIRST UNACKNOWLEDGED SHAKESPEARE PLAY THE MISFORTUNES OF ARTHUR AND ITS EXTENSIVE LINKS TO A WHOLE RANGE OF HIS OTHER SHAKESPEARE PLAYS By A Phoenix It is an immense ocean that surrounds the island of truth Francis Bacon If circumstances lead me I will find Where truth is hid, though it were hid indeed Within the centre [Hamlet: 2:2: 159-61] Tempore Patet Occulta Veritas (In Time the Hidden Truth will be Revealed) Francis Bacon 1 CONTENTS 1. The Silence of the Bacon Editors and Biographers 4 2. The So-called Contributors of The Misfortunes of Arthur 7 3. The Background of The Misfortunes of Arthur 28 4. The Political Allegory of The Misfortunes of Arthur 41 5. Francis Bacon Sole Author of The Misfortunes of Arthur 47 6. The Misfortunes of Arthur and the Shakespeare Plays 57 References 102 2 FACSIMILES Fig. 1 The Title Page of The Misfortunes of Arthur 52 Fig. 2 The First Page of the Introduction 53 Fig. 3 The Last Page of the Introduction 54 Fig. 4 The Page naming Hughes as the Principal Author 55 Fig. 5 The Final Page of The Misfortunes of Arthur 56 [All Deciphered] 3 1. THE SILENCE OF THE BACON EDITORS AND BIOGRAPHERS In normal circumstances any drama with any kind of proximity to the Shakespeare plays however remote or tenuous would ordinarily attract the attention of biographers, editors and commentators in their battalions. Who would individually and collectively scrutinize it for all traces, echoes, parallels, mutual links, and any and all connections to the hallowed Shakespeare canon.
    [Show full text]
  • Coppage-Coppedge Family
    THE COPPAGE-COPPEDGE FAMILY 1542 - 1955 l . ' ....,.,< ·l· (i, X'. ;.;~~ ·¼~"' ~~f t:9; .· -{.;'. -~}- ... , --,:.,;•: "«) j ''-t'Sr_ ,~, f t'P ·; ',.,.,.-:; ' ...· , ., ' : · ...... ,. -- -··-···~-',_. ; by JOHN E. MANAHAN, BOX 926, RADFORD, VIRGINIA and A. MAXIM COPPAGE, HALE, MISSOURI Photo Engravings by ALLIED ARTS, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA. Printed in U.S.A. COMMONWEALTH PRESS, RADFORD, VIRGINIA AUGUST, 1955 THE COPP AGE-COPPEDGE FAMILY 1542 -1955 I nm ID4ynkt i...,. ___ . - • ·•- ..• . .• CHARLES HENRY BROWNING (1846 - 1926) Descendant of the Coppedges, Lewrights, Damerons, Balls, Haynies, Harrises, V eseys, Basyes, Taylors, and Gas­ kinses. Grandson of the Lord l\tlayor of London and Founder of the Baronial OrdeT of Runnemede; Aryan Order of St. George; Author of The True Shakespeare TO ALL THE COPPAGES AND COPPEDGES WHO HAVE PRESERVED THEIR RECORDS AND CONTRIB- UTED SO GENEROUSLY TO MAKE THIS BOOK POSSIBLE TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I - THE COPPEDGE FAMILY OF ENGLAND .................... I Chapter II - EARLY MEMBERS OF EDWARD COPPEDGE'S FAMILY IN MARYLAND ... ........ .. .. .. ... .. .... .. .. .......... ............................. 9 Chapter III - DESCENDANTS OF BENJAMIN COPPAGE OF QUEEN ANNE .................................................................................... 13 Chapter IV - THE COPPEDGES OF NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY, VIRGINIA ....... ................................ ................ ... .... .................. 25 Chapter V - THE LINE OF JOHN COPPEDGE OF FAUQUIER ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • If Bacon Is Shakespeare, What Questions Does That Answer?
    If Bacon is Shakespeare, What Questions Does That Answer? By Christina G. Waldman November 27, 2020 (revised from March 8, 2019) Many literary critics seem to think that an hypothesis about obscure and remote questions of history can be refuted by a simple demand for the production of more evidence than in fact exists.—But the true test of an hypothesis, if it cannot be shewn to conflict with known truths, is the number of facts that it correlates, and explains. —Francis MacDonald Cornford 1 “A prudent question is, as it were, one half of wisdom. ”2 —Francis Bacon Much evidence has accumulated over the past four centuries supporting Bacon’s authorship of Shakespeare, 3 though it has largely been ignored by “orthodox Stratfordian” scholars who hold to the “traditional” view that William Shaxpere of Stratford wrote the works that bear the name of William Shakespeare. We know so few facts for certain about Shaxpere’s biography!4 Many who doubt Bacon’s authorship have, I venture to say, never really looked at the matter closely; for the case against Bacon is superficial, a matter of opinion. It seems that there has been such a concerted effort to foist upon the world an imposter, to hide the real author(s) from the world’s eyes. Once the myth became accepted, people became reluctant to question it, as if it were sacrosanct. Yet, there have been doubters of Shaxpere’s authorship on record, even during Shakespeare the poet’s lifetime. 5 In a scientific inquiry, any hypothesis or opinion is subject to reconsideration when new facts are brought to light.
    [Show full text]
  • If Bacon Is Shakespeare…
    If Bacon is Shakespeare… By Christina G. Waldman March 5, 2019 Hypothetically speaking, if Francis Bacon is Shakespeare, or at least, played a major role in the writing and editing of the Shakespeare Works, what questions would that answer? What mysteries might it solve?1 Many literary critics seem to think that an hypothesis about obscure and remote questions of history can be refuted by a simple demand for the production of more evidence than in fact exists.—But the true test of an hypothesis, if it cannot be shewn to conflict with known truths, is the number of facts that it correlates, and explains.2 “A prudent question is, as it were, one half of wisdom.”3 If Bacon is Shakespeare, might it not help explain why there has been such a concerted effort to foist upon the world an imposter, to hide the real author(s) from the world’s eyes? (Before you say no, please read to the end and, if you are so inclined so some reading in the sources I have referenced. I hope you will agree that any hypothesis or opinion is subject to reconsideration when new facts are brought to light. Some have already made up their minds, based on what they have always heard. However, “I think he wrote his own stuff” hides the question: who was “he”? Other candidates include Edward de Vere, Marlowe, John Florio, and others. However, was the case ever closed against Bacon? No. In fact, he won in an actual court case, based on the evidence presented— although the decision was later dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction (authority to decide the matter).4).
    [Show full text]
  • A Queenly Affinity? Catherine of Aragon's Estates and Henry VIII's
    2019 VI A Queenly Affinity? Catherine of Aragon’s Estates and Henry VIII’s Great Matter Michelle Beer Article: A Queenly Affinity? Catherine of Aragon’s Estates and Henry VIII’s Great Matter A Queenly Affinity? Cathrine of Aragon’s Estates and Henry VIII’s Great Matter1 Michelle Beer INDEPENDENT SCHOLAR Abstract: Catherine of Aragon’s support during Henry VIII’s campaign to annul their marriage relied on an affinity formed through her estates, specifically through the familial and regional connections between the queen and her local officials, tenants, and councillors. Using receivers’ accounts, land indentures, royal grants, and household accounts, this article traces the legal, administrative, and political activities of the men and women who served the queen. Existing scholarship of early modern queens’ estates has focused on the legal status of the queen’s council and the solvency of her household, but Catherine’s use of her estates demonstrates that their primary importance was as a source of authority, legitimacy, and independent patronage. Keywords: Catherine of Aragon; queenship; Tudor history; Reformation; Henry VIII; divorce n 3 September 1533, the Imperial ambassador Eustace Chapuys reported a rumor to the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V that parliament, in its next session, would deprive Catherine of Aragon of the income assigned to her as queen consort. O According to Chapuys, this is the thing which the Queen dreads most, and which causes her most pain and sorrow, more than any other personal annoyance she has hitherto gone through, imagining that as long as she retains the allowance and estate which queens generally enjoy she may consider herself as a queen, and not be dispossessed of her rank and dignity.
    [Show full text]
  • Q&A with Claire Mceachern
    Q&A with CSW u p d atNOVEMBER e 2012 Claire McEachern At Lambeth Palace Library, London, Claire McEachern did research on the “intellectual daughters of Sir Anthony Cooke” 1with support from a CSW Faculty Development Grant. Claire McEachern is Professor of English at UCLA. Her project, “The intellectual daughters of Sir Anthony Cooke, 1526-1609,” is a cultural biography of four sisters whose lives intersected with many of the most formative events of sixteenth-century England. McEachern received a CSW CSW u p d atNOVEMBER e 2012 Faculty Development Grant to support this project in 2011. Q & A WITH Claire McEachern HER RESEARCH FOCUSES ON FOUR SISTERS WHO WERE RENOWNED FOR THEIR OWN SCHOLARLY WORK What drew you to the study of religion in sixteenth- sixteenth-century notions of community were and seventeenth-century British literature? based in the Reformation revisions of religious identity (for instance, the liturgical and In this period, early modern religion is where all linguistic descriptions of community proposed the action is: political, intellectual, emotional, by the Book of Common Prayer) and that to scientific, and of course literary. I came of study political identities in this period meant scholarly age in the moment of new historicism, grappling with the way religion imagined the with an intention to become a Shakespearean bonds between persons, places and polities. scholar. I thought my dissertation, a study of What led you to your current research project on the poetics of nationhood in Shakespeare’s the intellectual daughters
    [Show full text]
  • Anne, Lady Bacon: a Life in Letters
    ANNE, LADY BACON: A LIFE IN LETTERS Katherine Alice Mair Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD Queen Mary, University of London 2009 ALL MISSING PAGES ARE BLANK IN ORIGINAL 2 Statement of Originality I, Katherine Alice Mair, affirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own, except where otherwise acknowledged in the text. 3 Abstract Anne, Lady Bacon (c.1S2B-1610) is chiefly remembered as the translator of several important religious texts and as the mother of Francis and Anthony Bacon. This thesis seeks to re-evaluate her fulfilment of her role as a mother, translator and religious patron through an examination of her correspondence and an assessment of her published works. In doing so it demonstrates that Anne was adept at utilising epistolary conventions in order to achieve her politico-religious aims, and was far more capable at negotiating complex webs of power than has hitherto been acknowledged. Over one hundred of her letters survive, most of which are written to Anthony between the 1592 and 1596, and only a few of which have been published. I have transcribed all these extant letters, and through a close analysis of their content and material construction I offer an outline of her epistolary habits, and demonstrate how her letter-writing practice was influenced by the practical elements of sixteenth-century epistolary culture. I describe the factors that influenced Anne's relationship with her sons, and analyse how both parties performed or neglected their duties. The second half of my thesis focuses on Anne's religious patronage. I describe the iconographic significance of the female translator, and examine Anne's contribution to the nascent Protestant literary culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION Lady Anne Bacon (c.1528–1610) was a woman who inspired strong emotion in her own lifetime. As a girl, she was praised as a ‘verteouse meyden’ for her religious translations, while a rejected suitor condemned her as faithless as an ancient Greek temptress.1 The Spanish ambassador reported home that, as a married woman, she was a tiresomely learned lady, whereas her husband celebrated the time they spent reading classical literature together.2 During her widowhood, she was ‘beloved’ of the godly preachers surrounding her in Hertfordshire; Godfrey Goodman, later bishop of Gloucester, instead argued that she was ‘little better than frantic in her age’.3 Anne’s own letters allow a more balanced exploration of her life. An unusually large number are still extant; she is one of the select group of Elizabethan women whose surviving correspondence includes over fifty of the letters they wrote themselves, a group that incorporates her sister, Lady Elizabeth Russell, and the noblewoman Bess of Hardwick, the countess of Shrewsbury.4 1G.B., ‘To the Christen Reader’, in B. Ochino, Fouretene sermons of Barnadine Ochyne, concernyng the predestinacion and eleccion of god, trans. A[nne] C[ooke] (London, 1551), sig. A2r. For Walter Haddon’s comparison of Anne to Cressida, a character from ancient Greek mythology, see BL, Lansdowne MS 98,fo.252r. 2M.A.S. Hume (ed.), Calendar of Letters and State Papers Relating to English Affairs Preserved Principally in the Archives of Simancas, 1558–1603, 4 vols (1892–1899), I, p. 20;N.Bacon,The Recreations of His Age (Oxford, 1919), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Francis Bacon, Nature, and the Politics of Religion
    The World’s a Bubble: Francis Bacon, Nature, and the Politics of Religion James A. T. Lancaster A dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Combined Historical Studies The Warburg Institute, School of Advanced Studies University of London 2015 – !1 – I declare that the work presented in this thesis is my own James A. T. Lancaster The World’s a Bubble, and the life of man / less than a span. ⎯ Francis Bacon, ‘The World’s a Bubble’ – !2 – Abstract This thesis examines the development of Francis Bacon’s (1561-1626) religious views and their impact on his programme for the advancement of learning. It aims to address the largely misguided body of scholarly literature on Bacon’s beliefs by situating his understanding of religion within the complexity of its Elizabethan and Stuart contexts, and to show how Bacon steered his own considered course between the emergent pil- lars of Puritanism and Conformism. To the latter end, it evinces how he drew upon the Christian humanism of his parents, Nicholas and Anne Bacon, as well as the political thought of Niccolò Machiavelli, Francesco Guicciardini, and Justus Lipsius. Guided by the same intellectual commitments, he subsequently came to develop his own ideas about the reform of knowledge and the character of nature within the broader context of Christian humanism, Florentine political thought, and the Magisterial Reformation in England. It argues that, contrary to modern categories of thought, Bacon had no difficul- ty being both a Reformed Christian and a statesman for whom religion was often little more than a social or political currency.
    [Show full text]
  • The Letters of Anthony Bacon, 1558-1601. Tosh., William Patrick
    Testimonies of affection and dispatches of intelligence: The letters of Anthony Bacon, 1558-1601. Tosh., William Patrick The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/9075 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] 1 Testimonies of affection and dispatches of intelligence: The letters of Anthony Bacon, 1558-1601 William Patrick Tosh Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen Mary, University of London 2013 2 Statement of originality I, William Patrick Tosh, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged below and my contribution indicated. Previously published material is also acknowledged below. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other Intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the College has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of the thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university.
    [Show full text]
  • Save Pdf (0.07
    INDEX All entries refer to page numbers, not letter numbers. ‘n.’ after a page reference indicates the number of a note on that page. Abbotsbury (see Barley estate, Hertfordshire) 197–198, 202, 206–209, 213, 217–218, Albert VII, archduke of Austria 250–251 220–221, 224–225, 229–230, 232– Albret, Jeanne d’, queen of Navarre 85–86 236, 238, 244, 249, 256, 261, 265– aldermen (see London: aldermen) 266, 274–275, 277–278, 282, 285– Allen, Captain Francis 12–13 286, 288;Hebrew5, 7, 19, 100, Altham, James 147 232, 238, 268, 280; Italian 5, 9 (see Anthony, servant of Anne Bacon 262 also Bacon, Lady Anne: translations: Antonio,´ Dom, prior of Crato 161 Ochino); Latin 5–9, 22, 42, 55– archdeaconry court (see St Albans: archdea- 58, 61–69, 76, 80–86, 89–93, 100, conry court) 102–107, 111–116, 118, 120, 124–126, Archelow/Archeloe, Dr 227 130, 138–139, 141–142, 144, 147, 150, Argentine, Richard 5 152, 157, 160–163, 168, 172, 174–176, Audley, Thomas, lord chancellor 14, 67 178–179, 181–182, 188–193, 195–196, Auvergne, Henri de la Tour d’, fourth 198–201, 203–204, 207–211, 214–221, vicomte de Turenne, duc of Bouillon 223–224, 226–238, 240, 242–243, 22, 238–239, 248, 255–256, 258 246–247, 249, 253–255, 257, 259, Aylmer, John, bishop of London 25, 180 n. 262–263, 265, 267–270, 273, 275– 619, 181–182 280, 282–283, 286 (see also Bacon, Lady Anne: translations: Apologia) finances 28–31, 107, 123–128, 141, 150, Babbe, Francis 119 157–158, 166–170, 173–177, 188–189, Bacon, Lady Anne (n´ee Butts) 288 194, 214, 226, 228, 230, 239, 243, Bacon, Lady Anne (n´ee
    [Show full text]
  • MYSTERY at COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG: the Truth of Bruton Vault
    MYSTERY AT COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG The Truth of Bruton Vault Davi Allen Rivera MYSTERY AT COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG: The Truth of Bruton Vault All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2014, 2007 By David Allen Rivera This book was produced in the United States of America by Rivera Enterprises Visit the Author’s archived writings at: http://sites.google.com/site/worksofdar For correspondence: [email protected] COVER: The portion of the Bruton Parish Churchyard where the site of the original church was located, underneath which the Bruton Vault is said to be located. The public is no longer permitted to walk into this area. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface11111111111111111111..1111111111111111..1.2 Introduction111111111111111111111..111..1.111111.11114 Sir ,rancis Bacon1111.1111111111111111..11.11111.11111..4 The Shakespeare5Bacon Connection11111111111.1.111..1111.111.1.12 The 6ing 7ames Bible11111111111111111111..11.1111..1111.28 Ne Atlantis1111111111111111111111.11...1.1111.111....121 7amesto n1111111111111111111111111...11.111.1111...28 Bacon(s Rebellion111111111111111111.111.1.11.111.1111141 Bacon(s Castle111111111111.11111111.111.111.1.111111.44 The Bruton 0arish Church11111111111111.111.11..111.111111.48 Custis5Maupin House1111.1111111111111111.11..111.11111.88 Sir Christopher Wren Building11111111111111111.1.11.1..11111...42 7ames Geddy House1111.1111111111111111111.1.1.1.1111..84 George Wythe House11111.111111111111111111.1..11.1111.88 The 0o der Magazine111111111111111111111111..1..11.11192 What Is Inside the Bruton VaultA111111.1111.11111111.11..1.1111.94
    [Show full text]