DOCSLIB.ORG

Retronasal Olfaction As Affected by Miracle Fruit and Gymnema Sylvestre

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Retronasal Olfaction As Affected by Miracle Fruit and Gymnema Sylvestre RETRONASAL OLFACTION AS AFFECTED BY MIRACLE FRUIT AND GYMNEMA SYLVESTRE By SONIA DARA HUDSON A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 © 2011 Sonia Dara Hudson 2 To my parents 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank my supervisory committee: Dr. Charles Sims, Dr. Linda Bartoshuk, Dr. Renée Goodrich-Schneider, and Dr. Bruce Welt for all of your knowledge and guidance throughout this study. I especially thank Dr. Sims for serving as my major advisor and giving me the opportunity to pursue my graduate degree. I also thank Dr. Bartoshuk for all of her support and countless hours helping me analyze the data. I thank all of my labmates past and present – Adilia Blandón-Ubeda, Betty Natasha Coello, Eric Dreyer, Brittany Martin, Dr. Asli Odabasi, and Lorenzo Puentes. Thanks for all of your help with the informal tasting sessions! I could not have selected my foods without all of you. Thank you Lorenzo for showing me how to use Compusense and putting together the design. Thank you Adilia and Eric for setting up and running the panels. Thank you Asli for all of your help with the statistical analysis. Thank you Betty and Brittany for your help and support while I was writing my thesis! I also thank the Sensory Lab crew for setting up and running the longest and most involved taste panels. I thank all one hundred of my panelists for their participation and providing great data. I enjoyed watching all of your facial expressions, especially after tasting lemons and strawberries after the miracle fruit! Finally, I thank my family and friends for all of their support and encouragement - thank you for always being there for me! 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ 7 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 8 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................. 9 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 13 2 LITERATURE REVIEW .......................................................................................... 16 Flavor Perception .................................................................................................... 16 Odor Perception ...................................................................................................... 17 Taste Perception ..................................................................................................... 18 Determining Taste Status ....................................................................................... 19 Genetics of Taste .................................................................................................... 21 Bitter Taste Receptor ....................................................................................... 22 Sweet Taste Receptor ...................................................................................... 22 Sour Taste Receptor ........................................................................................ 23 Taste-Modifying Compounds .................................................................................. 23 Miracle Fruit ...................................................................................................... 24 Early studies .............................................................................................. 25 Mechanism ................................................................................................. 27 Recent research ......................................................................................... 29 Gymnema Sylvestre ......................................................................................... 30 Mechanism ................................................................................................. 31 Potential uses ............................................................................................ 32 Methods of Sensory Evaluation .............................................................................. 32 Category Scales ............................................................................................... 34 Direct Scaling Methods..................................................................................... 34 Labeled Scales ................................................................................................. 35 Labeled Magnitude Scale (LMS) ...................................................................... 36 General Labeled Magnitude Scale (gLMS) ....................................................... 37 3 RESEARCH METHODS AND MATERIALS ........................................................... 39 Panelist Recruitment ............................................................................................... 39 Taste-Modifying Compounds .................................................................................. 39 Food Selection ........................................................................................................ 40 5 Sensory Laboratory ................................................................................................ 41 Questionnaire Design ............................................................................................. 41 Training Session ..................................................................................................... 43 Study One ............................................................................................................... 44 Study Two ............................................................................................................... 45 Statistical Analysis .................................................................................................. 46 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ............................................................................... 48 Study One ............................................................................................................... 50 Sour, but not Sweet .......................................................................................... 51 Sweet, but not Sour .......................................................................................... 55 Sweet and Sour ................................................................................................ 57 Not Sweet and not Sour ................................................................................... 59 Odor ................................................................................................................. 60 Taste and Overall Flavor Correlations .............................................................. 61 Strawberry .................................................................................................. 61 Lemon ........................................................................................................ 62 Maple syrup ............................................................................................... 62 Gender and Body Mass Index (BMI) ................................................................ 63 Study Two ............................................................................................................... 64 Sour, but not Sweet .......................................................................................... 65 Sweet, but not Sour .......................................................................................... 67 Sweet and Sour ................................................................................................ 68 Not Sweet and not Sour ................................................................................... 68 Gender and BMI ............................................................................................... 69 5 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................ 92 APPENDIX A QUESTIONNAIRE .................................................................................................. 94 B IRB FORM .............................................................................................................. 95 C gLMS ...................................................................................................................... 96 D COMPUSENSE TEST BALLOT ............................................................................. 97 LIST OF REFERENCES ............................................................................................. 112 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH .......................................................................................... 117 6 LIST OF TABLES Table page 3-1 Food samples with typical taste associations and expected flavor changes. ..... 47 3-2 Demographic information of all panelists from study one and study two. ........... 47 4-1 Significant means differences for study one ....................................................... 70 4-2 Significant correlations for study one for selected food samples .......................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effects of Gymnemic Acid on Sweet Taste Perception in Primates
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by RERO DOC Digital Library Chemical Senses Volume 8 Number 4 1984 Effects of gymnemic acid on sweet taste perception in primates D.Glaser, G.Hellekant1, J.N.Brouwer2 and H.van der Wei2 Anthropologisches Institut der Universitdt Zurich, CH 8001 Zurich, Switzerland, ^Department of Veterinary Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI53706, USA, and 2Unilever Research Laboratorium Vlaardingen, The Netherlands (Received July 1983; accepted December 1983) Abstract. Application of gymnemic acid (GA) on the tongue depresses the taste of sucrose in man. This effect, as indicated by electrophysiological responses, has been found to be absent in three non- human primate species. In the present behavioral study the effect of GA on taste responses in 22 primate species, with two subspecies, and 12 human subjects has been investigated. In all the non- human primates studied, including the Pongidae which are closely related to man, GA did not sup- press the response to sucrose, only in man did GA have a depressing effect. Introduction In 1847, in a communication to the Linnean Society of London, mention was made for the first time of a particular property of a plant native to India belong- ing to the Asclepiadaceae: 'A further communication, from a letter written by Mr Edgeworth, dated Banda, 30th August, 1847, was made to the meeting, reporting a remarkable effect produced by the leaves of Gymnema sylvestris R.Br. upon the sense of taste, in reference to diminishing the perception of saccharin flavours'. Further details relating to the effect of these leaves were given by Falconer (1847/48).
    [Show full text]
  • Native Indigenous Tree Species Show Recalcitrance to in Vitro Culture
    Journal of Agriculture and Life Sciences ISSN 2375-4214 (Print), 2375-4222 (Online) Vol. 2, No. 1; June 2015 Native Indigenous Tree Species Show Recalcitrance to in Vitro Culture Auroomooga P. Y. Yogananda Bhoyroo Vishwakalyan Faculty of Agriculture University of Mauritius Jhumka Zayd Forestry Service Ministry of Agro-Industry (Mauritius) Abstract The status of the Mauritian forest is alarming with deforestation and invasive alien species deeply affecting the indigenous flora. Therefore, major conservation strategies are needed to save the remaining endemic tree species. Explants form three endemic tree species Elaeocarpus bojeri, Foetidia mauritiana and Sideroxylon grandiflorum were grown under in vitro conditions. These species are rareand Elaeocarpus bojeri has been classified as critically endangered. Thidiazuron (TDZ) and 6-Benzylaminopurine (BAP) were used as growth promoters in order to stimulate seed germination, callus induction. Half strength Murashige and Skoog’s (MS) media supplemented with coconut water, activated charocoal and phytagel were used as growth media. Hormone levels of TDZ were 0.3mg/l and 0.6mg/l while BAP level was at 1mg/l. Germination rate for E.bojeri was low (5%) with TDZ 0.3mg/l. Sideroxylon grandiflorum seeds showed no response to in vitro culture, while F mauritiana showed successful callus induction with TDZ 0.6mg/l and 0.3mg/l. Keywords: Elaeocarpus bojeri, Foetidia mauritiana, Sideroxylon grandiflorum, in vitro culture, TDZ, BAP 1.0 Introduction The increase in population size, island development and sugarcane cultivation led to drastic deforestation that reduced the native forest to less than 2%. Mauritius has the most endangered terrestrial flora in the world according to the IUCN (Ministry of Environment & Sustainable Development (MoESD), 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Plants for Hawai'i Landscapes
    Landscape May 2006 L-14 Edible Plants for Hawai‘i Landscapes Melvin Wong Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences ost people love to grow plants that have edible The kukui tree (Fig. 5a, b, c) is a hardy tree that will Mparts. The choice of which plants to grow depends add greenish-white to the landscape. upon an individual’s taste, so selecting plants for a land­ Other less common but attractive plants with edible scape is usually a personal decision. This publication parts include sapodilla, ‘Tahitian’ breadfruit, ‘Kau’ mac­ gives a broad overview of the subject to provide a basis adamia, mangosteen, orange, lemon, lime, kumquat, ja­ for selecting edible plants for Hawai‘i landscapes. boticaba, surinam cherry, tea, coffee, cacao, clove, bay The list of fruits, vegetables, and plants with edible rum, bay leaf, cinnamon, vanilla, noni, pikake, rose, parts is extensive, but many of these plants do not make variegated red Spanish pineapple, rosemary, lavender, good landscape plants. For example, mango, litchi, lon­ ornamental pepper, society garlic, nasturtium, calabash gan, and durian trees are popular because of their fruits, gourd, ung tsoi, sweetpotato, land cress, Tahitian taro, but they are too large to make good landscape trees for and edible hibiscus. most urban residential situations. However, they can be Sapodilla (Fig. 6a, b, c) is a compact tree with sweet, and often are planted on large houselots, particularly in edible fruits. ‘Tahitian’ breadfruit (Fig. 7) is a compact rural areas, and in circumstances where landscape de­ tree that is not as large and spreading as the common sign aesthetics are not of paramount importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Easy Growing Instructions for the Miracle Berry Plant Synsepalum Dulcificum “Miracle Fruit” (Sin-SEP-Ah-Lum)
    141 North Street Danielson, CT 06239 Toll Free: (888) 330-8038 FAX: (888) 774-9932 www.logees.com Easy Growing Instructions for the Miracle Berry Plant Synsepalum dulcificum “Miracle Fruit” (sin-SEP-ah-lum) This exciting plant from Tropical West Africa known as the Miracle Berry or Miracle Fruit (Synsepalum dulcificum) is a slow growing shrub that, once mature, produces fruit intermittently throughout the year. The miracle is in the berry. After you’ve eaten the small gumdrop sized berry, everything sour afterwards turns sweet. A mature plant will flower and fruit year-round. Once the plant reaches two feet in height it will produce fruit. More fruit tends to set in the summer time. When the fruit is ripe, the berries turn red. Ripe berries will hold onto the bush for several weeks. Hand pollination ensures that fruit will be produced. Pollinate by shaking the leave back and forth or by rubbing your hands through the branches when the plant is in flower. How to Care for Your Miracle Plant Light- Keep in a full-to-partially sunlit window. The more sun, the better. Water- Keep evenly moist, using a non-chlorinated water or, if the water is chlorinated, let it stand for 24 hours. Excessive dryness will kill or damage the plant. Do not allow to dry out. The greatest cause of losing the plant is that the roots dry out. Be especially attentive to watering, especially under high heat. We recently found a self-watering globe that will keep this plant evenly moist (new in our Fall 2007 catalogue).
    [Show full text]
  • A Biobrick Compatible Strategy for Genetic Modification of Plants Boyle Et Al
    A BioBrick compatible strategy for genetic modification of plants Boyle et al. Boyle et al. Journal of Biological Engineering 2012, 6:8 http://www.jbioleng.org/content/6/1/8 Boyle et al. Journal of Biological Engineering 2012, 6:8 http://www.jbioleng.org/content/6/1/8 METHODOLOGY Open Access A BioBrick compatible strategy for genetic modification of plants Patrick M Boyle1†, Devin R Burrill1†, Mara C Inniss1†, Christina M Agapakis1,7†, Aaron Deardon2, Jonathan G DeWerd2, Michael A Gedeon2, Jacqueline Y Quinn2, Morgan L Paull2, Anugraha M Raman2, Mark R Theilmann2, Lu Wang2, Julia C Winn2, Oliver Medvedik3, Kurt Schellenberg4, Karmella A Haynes1,8, Alain Viel3, Tamara J Brenner3, George M Church5,6, Jagesh V Shah1* and Pamela A Silver1,5* Abstract Background: Plant biotechnology can be leveraged to produce food, fuel, medicine, and materials. Standardized methods advocated by the synthetic biology community can accelerate the plant design cycle, ultimately making plant engineering more widely accessible to bioengineers who can contribute diverse creative input to the design process. Results: This paper presents work done largely by undergraduate students participating in the 2010 International Genetically Engineered Machines (iGEM) competition. Described here is a framework for engineering the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana with standardized, BioBrick compatible vectors and parts available through the Registry of Standard Biological Parts (www.partsregistry.org). This system was used to engineer a proof-of-concept plant that exogenously expresses the taste-inverting protein miraculin. Conclusions: Our work is intended to encourage future iGEM teams and other synthetic biologists to use plants as a genetic chassis.
    [Show full text]
  • Perennial Edible Fruits of the Tropics: an and Taxonomists Throughout the World Who Have Left Inventory
    United States Department of Agriculture Perennial Edible Fruits Agricultural Research Service of the Tropics Agriculture Handbook No. 642 An Inventory t Abstract Acknowledgments Martin, Franklin W., Carl W. Cannpbell, Ruth M. Puberté. We owe first thanks to the botanists, horticulturists 1987 Perennial Edible Fruits of the Tropics: An and taxonomists throughout the world who have left Inventory. U.S. Department of Agriculture, written records of the fruits they encountered. Agriculture Handbook No. 642, 252 p., illus. Second, we thank Richard A. Hamilton, who read and The edible fruits of the Tropics are nnany in number, criticized the major part of the manuscript. His help varied in form, and irregular in distribution. They can be was invaluable. categorized as major or minor. Only about 300 Tropical fruits can be considered great. These are outstanding We also thank the many individuals who read, criti- in one or more of the following: Size, beauty, flavor, and cized, or contributed to various parts of the book. In nutritional value. In contrast are the more than 3,000 alphabetical order, they are Susan Abraham (Indian fruits that can be considered minor, limited severely by fruits), Herbert Barrett (citrus fruits), Jose Calzada one or more defects, such as very small size, poor taste Benza (fruits of Peru), Clarkson (South African fruits), or appeal, limited adaptability, or limited distribution. William 0. Cooper (citrus fruits), Derek Cormack The major fruits are not all well known. Some excellent (arrangements for review in Africa), Milton de Albu- fruits which rival the commercialized greatest are still querque (Brazilian fruits), Enriquito D.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory for the Mechanism of Action of "Miracle Fruit"
    Theory for the mechanism of action of "miracle fruit" ERNEST DZENDOLETI UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS The action of miracle fruit in changing the quality ofa sour result can be explained in the following way: A prolonged rinse stimulus to that of sweet is hypothesized as being caused by with an acid solution, i.e., adaptation to an acid, can be blocking of the sour receptor sites. It is assumed, according to a considered as loading sweet receptor sites with protons to a new theory that holds that proton acceptors are sweet-evoking, degree greater than is normally the case. No sweet quality is that many sour stimuli are also simultaneously stimuli for the reported in the course of this process because the mechanism for sweet receptors. However, the resulting sweet information is producing sweet, it will be remembered, is the removal of strongly inhibited by the sour system, so that sweet is not protons. (There are separate sites which react during the reported. adsorption of a proton, i.e., the sites for sour.) When the mouth is rinsed with water, the sweet taste appears, because protons are The purpose of this paper is to propose a mechanism for the then removed from the receptor sites, due to the much lower gustatory quality change that occurs, in response to certain concentration of protons in the water. stimuli, as a result of the action on the tongue of the active At this point, a hypothesis can be advanced as to the mode of principle in "miracle fruit" (Synsepalum dulcificum). In brief, action of Gymnema sylvestre.
    [Show full text]
  • Thaumatococcus Daniellii
    Thaumatococcus daniellii Thaumatococcus daniellii is a plant species from Africa, Congo-Brazzaville, Cameroon, Central African known for being the natural source of thaumatin, an in- Republic) tensely sweet protein which is of interest in the develop- ment of sweeteners. It is a large, rhizomatous, flower- ing herb native to the rainforests of western Africa from Sierra Leone to Zaire.[1] It is also an introduced species 2 Uses in Australia and Singapore.[2] Thaumatococcus daniellii grows three to four meters in 2.1 Fruit height, and has large, papery leaves up to 46 centimeters long. It bears pale purple flowers and a soft fruit con- The most popular use of T. daniellii is as sweetener. taining a few shiny black seeds. The fruit is covered in a The aril contains a non-toxic, intensely sweet protein fleshy red aril, which is the part that contains thaumatin. named thaumatin, which is at least 3000 times as sweet as In its native range, the plant has a number of uses besides sucrose. In West Africa, the aril is traditionally used for flavoring. The sturdy leaf petioles are used as tools and sweetening bread, over-fermented palm-wine and sour building materials, the leaves are used to wrap food, and food. When the seeds are chewed, for up to an hour the leaves and seeds have a number of traditional medic- afterwards they cause sour materials eaten or drunk to inal uses.[3][4] taste very sweet. Since the mid-1990s, thaumatin is used as sweetener and flavour enhancer by the food and con- Common names for this species include miracle fruit fectionery industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Proximate and Mineral Composition of Synsepalum Dulcificum Seed
    Scientific Research Journal (SCIRJ), Volume III, Issue III, March 2015 1 ISSN 2201-2796 Proximate and Mineral Composition of Synsepalum Dulcificum Seed Olaitan J. Jeremiah Department of Pharmacology, Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife, Osun State,Nigeria [email protected] Olapade R. Ilesanmi Department of Pharmacology, Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife, Osun State,Nigeria [email protected] Morakinyo M. Ige Department of Food Science and Technology, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria. [email protected] Abstract- In this study, the proximate analysis of Synsepalum effect lasts until the protein is washed away by saliva (up to dulcificum seed was investigated and results showed that it has about 60 minutes). Miraculin is commercially used as a sugar moisture content (38.08%), crude protein (19.47%), crude fat substitute [2]. It has also been found useful among diabetics (11.94%), total carbohydrate (29.08%), crude fibre (0.66%) and and dieters possibly because research has shown that the fruit ash (1.43%). The mineral content was also determined. It has the ability to improve insulin sensitivity [6] and also contains 569.500 ± 2.820, 72.170 ± 5.340, 25.000 ± 0.000 and 17.630 ± 0.390 mg/100 g of Potassium, Calcium, Sodium and because of its characteristic of being a low-calorie sweetness Magnesium respectively. Other mineral elements found (in mg/ enhancer, limiting energy intake [7]. In addition to the value of 100 g) were Iron (3.050 ± 0.490), Zinc (2.710 ± 0.009), Copper the fruit as a taste modifier, the skin, pulp and seeds of miracle (2.420 ± 0.008), Manganese (2.380 ± 0.004), Nickel (0.240 ± 0.028) berries have been shown to have antioxidant properties, hence and Cadmium (0.013 ± 0.002).
    [Show full text]
  • The Biodiversity of Atewa Forest
    The Biodiversity of Atewa Forest Research Report The Biodiversity of Atewa Forest Research Report January 2019 Authors: Jeremy Lindsell1, Ransford Agyei2, Daryl Bosu2, Jan Decher3, William Hawthorne4, Cicely Marshall5, Caleb Ofori-Boateng6 & Mark-Oliver Rödel7 1 A Rocha International, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke St, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK 2 A Rocha Ghana, P.O. Box KN 3480, Kaneshie, Accra, Ghana 3 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A. Koenig (ZFMK), Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany 4 Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RB, UK 5 Department ofPlant Sciences, University ofCambridge,Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK 6 CSIR-Forestry Research Institute of Ghana, Kumasi, Ghana and Herp Conservation Ghana, Ghana 7 Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstr. 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany Cover images: Atewa Forest tree with epiphytes by Jeremy Lindsell and Blue-moustached Bee-eater Merops mentalis by David Monticelli. Contents Summary...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Recent history of Atewa Forest................................................................................................................................... 9 Current threats
    [Show full text]
  • Oncology Nutrition Connection
    Oncology Nutrition Connection A publication of the ON DPG Volume 23, Number 2, 2016 ON DPG Website ISSN 1545-9896 www.oncologynutrition.org Table of Contents ON DPG Message from the Chair For this issue of Oncology Nutrition Connection’s Message from the • Message from the Chair: CNM DPG Supporting ON DPG Chair, we are highlighting a letter from the Chair of a different DPG, the page 1 Clinical Nutrition Management (CNM) DPG. This all began at the ON DPG Breakfast at FNCE 2014, where Elaine Trujillo, MS, RDN, Past Chair • Brief Report: Fluoride Toxicity of ON DPG and Ann Yaktine, PhD, RD, Director of the Food and in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Nutrition Board at the Institute of Medicine (IOM), presented ON DPG’s page 2 plan to hold an IOM workshop to address Access to Nutrition Care in Outpatient Oncology. One of our active ON DPG members, Terese • Pediatric Oncology Nutrition Scollard, MBA, RD, LD, also is an active member of CNM DPG. Terese Corner: Pediatric vs. Adult Cancer: Critical Differences had the tremendous vision to see how our workshop could lay the page 3 foundation for improved access to RDs in many settings, not just in outpatient oncology. She had the foresight to invite CNM DPG to • CPE Article: Miraculin and support our workshop, and ON DPG was amazed and grateful when The Miracle Berry: An Option for Dysguesia? CNM pledged some of their hard-earned budget to support our page 7 workshop. We say “Kudos!” to CNM DPG, and are pleased to share this letter from CNM DPG with you! • Medical Cannabis Comes Out from Underground To members of CNM DPG and ON DPG, page 14 The quality of operational practices and Common concerns to both Clinical level of service integration can vary widely Nutrition Management and the Oncology among cancer programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Propagation Through Stem Cuttings of the Miraulous Berry
    Propagation Through Stem Cuttings of the Miraulous Berry Presented to Prof. Danielle Donnelly By Daniel Gagne Email address:[email protected] McGill University About the Author Daniel Gagné is a 1st year university student in science of agriculture and environment at McGill with a specialization in plant production. He transferred from UBC where his studies focused on sustainable agriculture. Discouraged by the lack of transferable credits McGill was offering, he decided to forgo his studies and enter the job market where he worked in an office for a few years. But now he’s back at square one determined to complete his studies at McGill and learn more about his passion of nature and cultivation. About the Plant The miraulous berry (Synsepalum dulcificum) is an evergreen shrub that originates from west Africa where It has been grown as an ornamental shrub and for its berries that have the unique ability to confer sweet flavors to otherwise bitter or acidic foods (Achigan-Dako, Gebauer, N’Danikou, Tchokponhoue, Vodouhe, 2015). Its natural habitat is the tropical rainforest understory hence it prefers partial shade but can tolerate full sun and is drought resistant as well. It produces small red oval shaped recalcitrant berries throughout the year. It is the flesh of these berries that contain miraculin, a glycoprotein substance that causes the flavor changing effects described above (Abdullah, Chen, Hassan, 2012). Cuttings from this plant have been described as difficult to root therefore most of the commercial production of this plant is done by seed. The plant is slow growing in the initial stages of its life, taking about 3 to 4 years for the plant to reach about 35-50 cm in height and bear fruit but growth accelerates afterwards (Abdullah, 2012).
    [Show full text]