DOCSLIB.ORG

Welcoming Europe's Youngest &

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Welcoming Europe's Youngest & WELCOMING EUROPE’S YOUNGEST HOW THE EU ACCESSION PROCESS TRANSFORMED CHILD PROTECTION IN ROMANIA & LESSONS FOR CURRENT EU ENLARGEMENT AND NEIGHBOURHOOD POLICIES TO INCREASE THE IMPACT OF CHILD PROTECTION REFORM IN THE REGION World Vision is a network of Christian relief, development and advocacy organisations dedicated to working with children, families and communities to overcome poverty and injustice. As followers of Jesus, World Vision is dedicated to working with the world’s most vulnerable people regardless of religion, race, ethnicity or gender. Transforming Communities Because poverty has both local and global causes, World Vision works within communities and across geographical areas to help individuals and groups improve the well-being of children and overcome poverty. Responding to Disasters World Vision is globally positioned to help with immediate needs like food, water and shelter when disaster strikes and to help communities to recover and prevent future catastrophes. Seeking Global Change World Vision engages institutions, donors and the general public to address the global problems that perpetuate poverty. Advocacy staff empower communities to speak up for their rights, locally and globally. In Central and Eastern Europe and the Caucasus, World Vision and its partner organisations work in Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, Kosovo, Montenegro, Romania and Serbia. © World Vision International 2012 Author: Jocelyn Penner Hall Researcher: Catalina Buciu All rights reserved. No portion of this publication may be reproduced in any form, except for brief excerpts in reviews, without prior permission of the publisher. Published by World Vision’s Middle East and Eastern Europe Office on behalf of World Vision International. For further information about this publication or World Vision International publications, or for additional copies of this publication, please contact [email protected]. CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................10 I. THE EU ACCESSION PROCESS SIGNIFICANTLY AND POSITIVELY IMPACTED CHILD PROTECTION REFORM IN ROMANIA.............12 A. EU ACCESSION PROCESS PROVIDES INCENTIVES FOR REFORM IN CANDIDATE COUNTRIES ..........................................................12 B. THE LANDSCAPE OF ROMANIA’S CANDIDACY ........................................................................................................................................................................13 C. CHILD PROTECTION REFORM AS AN ELEMENT OF THE ACCESSION PROCESS .............................................................................................14 D. ROMANIA’S REFORM SUCCESSES ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................18 II. LESSONS FROM ROMANIA’S ACCESSION PROCESS COULD APPLY TO CURRENT EU ENLARGEMENT AND NEIGHBOURHOOD POLICIES TO INCREASE THE IMPACT OF CHILD PROTECTION REFORM IN THE REGION ....................................... 20 A. THE VALUE OF ROMANIA’S LESSONS FOR THE REGION .................................................................................................................................................. 20 B. CAVEAT: SOME LESSONS AND VARIABLES ARE NOT REPLICABLE .............................................................................................................................. 20 C. LESSONS AND VARIABLES THAT ARE REPLICABLE .................................................................................................................................................................. 21 III. EFFECTS OF EU ENGAGEMENT FOR CHILD PROTECTION REFORM TODAY ...................................................................................................................... 23 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 ANNEXES .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 26 A. CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 B. TIMELINE OF EU AND ROMANIAN ACTIONS ON CHILD PROTECTION .............................................................................................................. 32 C. METHODOLOGY, SOURCES AND LIMITATIONS OF THE RESEARCH ....................................................................................................................... 34 D. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The development and publication of this research has been possible due to the collaborative efforts of many individuals, World Vision offices and external entities. The author and researcher would like to thank the following: Most notably, Daniela Buzducea for saving the day and Andy Guth (World Vision Romania), who provided exceptional insight on the Romania-EU perspective of child protection reform. This paper is dedicated to them as commendation for their own efforts during Romania’s reform period. Eve Jolly (World Vision Middle East and Eastern Europe Regional Office), who worked long, dedicated hours on the necessary but difficult components of this paper, including the chronology, timeline and references. She has also been a significantly strong thought partner in the paper’s development. Alexander Muterko (World Vision Brussels & EU Representation ivzw) and Sharon Payt, Fiona Smith and Mirela Oprea (World Vision Middle East and Eastern Europe Regional Office), who were instrumental in providing strategic guidance and technical input from the original concept to the final stages. Marie Cook (World Vision Middle East and Eastern Europe Regional Office), who assisted with editing of the paper. Jeff Hall (World Vision International), who provided guidance at important moments. 4 ACRONYMS DCP Department of Child Protection EC European Commission ENP European Neighbourhood Policy EP European Parliament EU European Union FDSN Democratic National Salvation Front ILO International Labour Organisation MEP Member of the European Parliament NAP National Action Plan NAPCR National Agency for the Protection of Child Rights NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization NCCP National Committee for Child Protection NGO Nongovernmental Organisation ODA Overseas Development Assistance PSD Social Democratic Party UNCRC United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fundamentally, the EU accession process significantly and positively impacted child protection reform in Romania. There are lessons from European Union (EU) and International relations theories provide the framework for Government of Romania engagement during the accession this discussion. Academic scholars argue that EU accession process that could apply to current EU policy on Enlargement provides incentives for reform in candidate countries; in and Neighbourhood Policies today. Such lessons could essence, they argue that the accession process is one cause increase the impact of child protection reform across of reform. The reason that accession leads to reform is the Central and Eastern European and Commonwealth articulated in three often-cited theories. First, reform of Independent States region. Fundamentally, Romania’s occurs because candidate countries see the cost of reforms story of child protection reform is an aspiration of what as less than the reward of EU membership (external is possible when multiple stakeholders from all levels of incentives). Second, candidate countries work towards policy engagement come together to change the lives of reforms because they are influenced to appreciate the children. Romania’s story
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CONSTITUTION of ROMANIA – Republished – the CONSTITUTION of ROMANIA of 1991 WAS AMENDED and COMPLETED by the LAW NO
    CONSTITUTION OF ROMANIA – republished – THE CONSTITUTION OF ROMANIA OF 1991 WAS AMENDED AND COMPLETED BY THE LAW NO. 429/2003 ON THE REVISION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ROMANIA, PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF ROMANIA, PART I, NO. 758 OF 29 OCTOBER 2003, REPUBLISHED BY THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL (THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF ROMANIA, PART I, NO. 767 OF 30 OCTOBER 2003) ON THE GROUNDS OF ARTICLE 152 OF THE CONSTITUTION, WITH THE UPDATED DENOMINATIONS AND THE RENUMBERED TEXTS (ARTICLE 152 BECAME, IN THE REPUBLISHED FORM, ARTICLE 156). THE LAW NO. 429/2003 ON THE REVISION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ROMANIA WAS APPROVED BY THE NATIONAL REFERENDUM OF 18-19 OCTOBER 2003, AND CAME INTO FORCE ON 29 OCTOBER 2003, THE DATE OF THE PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF ROMANIA, PART I, NO. 758 OF 29 OCTOBER 2003 OF THE DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT NO. 3 OF 22 OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE CONFIRMATION OF THE RESULT OF THE NATIONAL REFERENDUM OF 18-19 OCTOBER 2003 CONCERNING THE LAW ON THE REVISION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ROMANIA. THE CONSTITUTION OF ROMANIA, IN ITS INITIAL FORM, WAS ADOPTED IN THE SITTING OF THE CONSTITUANT ASSEMBLY OF 21 NOVEMBER 1991, WAS PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF ROMANIA, PART I, NO. 233 OF 21 NOVEMBER 1991, AND CAME INTO FORCE AFTER ITS APPROVAL BY THE NATIONAL REFERENDUM OF 8 DECEMBER 1991. CONSTITUTION OF ROMANIA – republished – Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naionale a României ROMÂNIA [Constituie] Constitution of Romania. – București: Monitorul Oficial R.A., 2012 ISBN 978–973–567–770-1 342.4(498)”1991“ CONTENTS TITLE I General
    [Show full text]
  • Usaid and Child Welfare Reform in Romania
    USAID AND CHILD WELFARE REFORM IN ROMANIA CHALLENGES, SUCCESSES, AND LEGACY JULY 2006 This report was produced for the Social Transition Team, Office of Democracy, Governance and Social Transition of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID/DGST/E&E) by Aguirre International, a division of JBS International, Inc. It was prepared under Task Order 12 of the Global Evaluation and Monitoring (GEM) IQC, Contract No. FAO-I-00-99-00010-00. The authors are Lucia Correll, Tim Correll, and Marius Predescu. USAID AND CHILD WELFARE REFORM IN ROMANIA Challenges, Successes, and Legacy The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Romanian Child Welfare Legacy Report TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYM LIST.......................................................................................................................... V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ IX Background on USAID’s Child Welfare Programs in Romania .............................................. ix The Politics of International Adoption..................................................................................... xi The Legacy ............................................................................................................................ xi Key Lessons Learned ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Anno 1, Numero 1, Febbraio 2011
    Anno VII, Numero 13, Luglio 2015, Numero speciale ISSN 2035-6633 Social work around the world Colors and shapes in a complex mosaic a cura di Elisabetta Kolar e Alessandro Sicora Quaderni dell Csall - 3 CENTRO STUDI PER L'AMERICA LATINA Quaderni del Csal - 3 Con i Quaderni del Csal, supplementi della rivista Visioni LatinoAmericane, il Centro studi per l’America Latina (Csal) vuole ampliare la sua proposta editoriale. Quaderno, nel suo significato etimologico, sta ad indicare un foglio piegato in quattro, un taccuino su cui si appuntano note e memorie per ricordare i passaggi sa- lienti di quello che si è detto, o che si vuole dire, e di quello che si è fatto, o che si vuole fare. È questa la funzione che noi vorremmo avessero i Quaderni del Csal: da una parte essere uno strumento agile di discussione, che miri agli aspetti essenziali del dibattito in corso con approfondimenti e riflessioni su tematiche specifiche riguardanti l’America Latina nelle sue relazioni con il mondo; dall’altra un documento in diveni- re, aperto a contributi successivi e mai definitivi, di studiosi e cultori delle questioni latinoamericane nel loro intrecciarsi con le dinamiche globali. Le proposte di pubblicazione vengono sottoposte al vaglio della direzione e alla valu- tazione di almeno due referee anonimi italiani e/o stranieri (double-blind international peer review). Devono pervenire con un anticipo di almeno 5-6 mesi rispetto alla data prevista per la pubblicazione (Gennaio e Luglio) La rivista Visioni LatinoAmericane è presente in: Archivio Istituzionale
    [Show full text]
  • Paradise Lost (4.65 Mb Pdf File)
    Edited by Tímea Junghaus and Katalin Székely THE FIRST ROMA PAVILION LA BIENNALE DI VENEZIA 2007 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 12 Foreword 13 Paradise Lost – The First Roma Pavilion by Tímea Junghaus 16 Statements 24 Second Site by Thomas Acton 30 Towards Europe’s First Nation by Michael M. Thoss 34 The Roma Pavilion in Venice – A Bold Beginning by Gottfried Wagner 36 Artists, Statements, Works Daniel BAKER 40 Tibor BALOGH 62 Mihaela CIMPEANU 66 Gabi JIMÉNEZ 72 András KÁLLAI 84 Damian LE BAS 88 Delaine LE BAS 100 Kiba LUMBERG 120 OMARA 136 Marian PETRE 144 Nihad Nino PUSˇIJA 148 Jenô André RAATZSCH 152 Dusan RISTIC 156 István SZENTANDRÁSSY 160 Norbert SZIRMAI - János RÉVÉSZ 166 Bibliography 170 Acknowledgements Foreword With this publication, the Open Society Institute, Allianz Kulturstiftung and the European Cultural Foundation announce The Open Society Institute, the Allianz Kulturstiftung and the European Cultural Foundation are pleased to sponsor the the First Roma Pavilion at the 52nd Venice Biennale, which presents a selection of contemporary Roma artists from eight First Roma Pavilion at the 52nd Venice Biennale. With artists representing eight countries, this is the first truly European European countries. pavilion in the Biennale's history, located in an exceptional space – Palazzo Pisani Santa Marina, a typical 16th-century Venetian palace in the city’s Canareggio district. This catalogue is the result of an initiative undertaken by the Open Society Institute’s Arts and Culture Network Program to find untapped talent and identify Roma artists who are generally unknown to the European art scene. During our A Roma Pavilion alongside the Biennale's national pavilions is a significant step toward giving contemporary Roma research, we contacted organisations, institutions and individuals who had already worked to create fair representations culture the audience it deserves.
    [Show full text]
  • Bk Inno 001904.Pdf
    LESSON NOTES Intermediate S1 #1 Giving Your Opinion in Romanian CONTENTS 2 Romanian 2 English 3 Vocabulary 4 Sample Sentences 5 Vocabulary Phrase Usage 6 Grammar 10 Cultural Insight # 1 COPYRIGHT © 2018 INNOVATIVE LANGUAGE LEARNING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ROMANIAN 1. Profesor În opinia lui Durkheim, sociologia este o știință distinctă și Petrescu: autonomă. 2. Marcel: Domnule profesor, mă scuzați, cum ați zis că se numește lucrarea de bază scrisă de Durkheim? 3. Profesor Da, "Regulile metodei sociologice", publicată în anul 1895. Petrescu: 4. Marcel: Mulțumesc. Aș vrea să o citesc. Credeți că sunt șanse să o găsesc la biblioteca universității? 5. Profesor Da, sigur. Dacă nu o găsiți, vă rog să mă contactați. Aș vrea Petrescu: să pregătiți pentru seminar o prezentare în perechi a punctelor cheie din această lucrare. 6. Simona: Mă scuzați, aș putea face eu echipă cu Marcel? 7. Profesor Da, sigur. Marcel, ești de acord că lucrezi cu Simona și să Petrescu: prezentați săptămâna viitoare? 8. Marcel: Sigur. Am însă o problemă, nu mă pot pregăti pentru următorul seminar deoarece am un alt examen la un curs opțional. Se poate amâna pentru încă o săptămână? Mulțumesc. 9. Profesor Da, pentru mine este în ordine. Stabilește și cu Simona și Petrescu: dați-mi de veste dacă vă pot ajuta cu ceva. ENGLISH 1. Professor According to Durkheim, sociology is a distinct and Petrescu: autonomous science. CONT'D OVER ROMANIANPOD101.COM INTERMEDIATE S1 #1 - GIVING YOUR OPINION IN ROMANIAN 2 2. Marcel: Professor, excuse me, what did you say Durkheim's basic work is called? 3. Professor Well it's "The Rules of the Sociological Method," published in Petrescu: 1895.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland, the Czech Republic, Russia, Mauritius, Seychelles, and in Newsrooms Across the United States
    Caught in the Middle: Central and Eastern European Journalism at a Crossroads A Report to the Center for International Media Assistance By Ellen Hume January 20, 2011 The Center for International Media Assistance (CIMA), a project of the National Endowment for Democracy, aims to strengthen the support, raise the visibility, and improve the e!ectiveness of media assistance programs by providing information, building networks, conducting research, and highlighting the indispensable role independent media play in the creation and development of sustainable democracies around the world. An im- portant aspect of CIMA’s work is to research ways to attract additional U.S. private sector interest in and support for international media development. CIMA convenes working groups, discussions, and panels on a variety of topics in the "eld of media development and assistance. The center also issues reports and recommendations based on working group discussions and other investigations. These reports aim to provide policymakers, as well as donors and practitioners, with ideas for bolstering the e!ectiveness of media assistance. Marguerite H. Sullivan Senior Director Center for International Media Assistance National Endowment for Democracy 1025 F Street, N.W., 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20004 Phone: (202) 378-9700 Fax: (202) 378-9407 Email: [email protected] URL: http://cima.ned.org About the Author Ellen Hume Ellen Hume is currently an Annenberg Fellow in Civic Media at Central European University in Budapest where in 2010 she taught in the political science department. From 2007-2009 she was research director of the Center for Future Civic Media at the MIT Media Lab.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the English Economic Terms in the Business Environment
    THE IMPACT OF THE ENGLISH ECONOMIC TERMS IN THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT Museanu Elena Romanian – American University Coanc ; Mariana Romanian – American University In terms of quantity, the English (American) influence in the economic language is striking, remarkable. The adjustment of these terms is brief, relative, which is not a factor favoring the assimilation of loans, but is permissible, in principle, for Anglicisms. In what concerns the need for these loans, it can be deemed that the demarcation between “necessary loans” and “luxury loans” is not yet solid. Low frequency or isolated Anglicisms may be classified into the second category (some may even affect proper specialized communication). Even if enough Anglicisms recorded in the economic press will not remain in Romanian, "the era of the Internet, of globalization"94, we may consider a greater influence of English in the economy (perhaps similar to computer science). Keywords: Anglicisms, economic terms, specialized communication I.1. Our research is focused on analyzing the importance of economic terminology for broader socio-professional groups. An observation that emerges is the representative presence and use of English terms in texts which seek their spread beyond the field of specialists. Such texts belong, in general, to a certain type of media – the “popularizing” press, eventually the press of “scientific popularization”. The interest in such cases is amplified when there is an obvious extra linguistic reasoning, such as the case of a part of economic terminology in Romania since 1990, a period characterized by profound economic changes. These extra linguistic realities sometimes need to be defined by explicit terms (and the scientific terms must generally be mono-semantic and, therefore, precise).
    [Show full text]
  • USAID/ ROMANIA FY 2002 Annual Report
    USAID/ ROMANIA FY 2002 Annual Report March 4, 2002 Please Note: The attached RESULTS INFORMATION is from the FY 2002 Annual report, and was assembled and analyzed by the country or USAID operating unit identified on the cover page. The Annual Report is a “pre-decisional” USAID document and does not reflect results stemming from formal USAID review(s) of this document. Related document information can be obtained from: USAID Development Experience Clearinghouse 1611 N. Kent Street, Suite 200 Arlington, VA 22209-2111 Telephone: 703/351-4006 Ext. 106 Fax: 703/351-4039 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.dec.org Released on or after July 1, 2002 3 Part III: Performance Narrative A. Challenges For the first time since 1995, Romania’s economy experienced growth in 2000 of 1.6 percent. For the first three quarters of the calendar year 2001 the GDP increased by 5.1 percent and is forecasted to continue at close to 4 percent during 2002. It is a most welcome sign. The 2001 Regular Report on Romania’s Progress toward Accession, released on November 13th, 2001 by the Commission of the European Communities, notes that there is a growing consensus about the ultimate objectives of economic policy. The GOR’s commitment to structural reform and macroeconomic stabilization was reaffirmed by concluding a new IMF program at the end of October 2001. Romania has made some progress towards macroeconomic stabilization: growth has resumed and exports have increased. The government is acutely aware of the need to implement the program agreed with the IMF and the EU pre-accession economic program.
    [Show full text]
  • Professional Integration Is Al
    Annals of the University of Oradea, Fascicle: Ecotoxicology, Animal Husbandry and Food Science and Technology, Vol. XVIII/A 2019 Analele Universitatii din Oradea, Fascicula: Ecotoxicologie, Zootehnie si Tehnologii de Industrie Alimentara, Vol.XVIII/A 2019 ORGANIZATIONAL INTERVENTION ON THE INTEGRATION OF NEW EMPLOYEES WITHIN THE ORGANIZATION Senior Lecturer Ph.D. Bacter Ramona Vasilica, Lecturer PhD Popovici Diana * * University of Oradea, Faculty of Environmental Protection, 26th Gen. Magheru St., 410048, Oradea, Romania, email: [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper aims to present the theoretical aspects regarding the integration of a new employee within an organization, but also to elaborate a program on facilitating the integration process. Many authors have shown that integration is a stressful process, which is why it is important for the new employee to be presented with the conditions and requirements as clearly as possible. Integration can be considered a process of exchange between the organization and the individual because each comes with its own values, conceptions, and purposethis process is to ensure the cohesion unit of the work teams. Integration is also considered a complex social process that is very important for the individual because if the relationships that the workplace develops are satisfactory then he lives with the feeling that within that framework, respectively the workplace, he can develop himself and his skills. These relationships are not always harmonious, and at this moment the integration is more difficult, raising difficult problems to solve, but there are also good relations between the members of the group, and in this case the integration of an individual will not suffer 1 Key words : new employee , integration, job , organization INTRODUCTION "Professional integration is a later phase of employment.
    [Show full text]
  • Razing of Romania's Past.Pdf
    REPORT Ttf F1 *t 'A. Í M A onp DlNU C GlURESCU THE RAZING OF ROMANIA'S PAST The Razing of Romania's Past was sponsored by the Kress Foundation European Preservation Program of the World Monuments Fund; it was published by USACOMOS. The World Monuments Fund is a U.S. nonprofit organization based in New York City whose purpose is to preserve the cultural heritage of mankind through administration of field restora­ tion programs, technical studies, advocacy and public education worldwide. World Monuments Fund, 174 East 80th Street, New York, N.Y. 10021. (212) 517-9367. The Samuel H. Kress Foundation is a U.S. private foundation based in New York City which concentrates its resources on the support of education and training in art history, advanced training in conservation and historic preservation in Western Europe. The Samuel H. Kress Foundation, 174 East 80th Street, N.Y. 10021. (212) 861-4993. The United States Committee of the International Council on Monuments and Sites (USACOMOS) is one of 60 national committees of ICOMOS forming a worldwide alliance for the study and conservation of historic buildings, districts and sites. It is an international, nongovernmental institution which serves as the focus of international cultural resources ex­ change in the United States. US/ICOMOS, 1600 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20006. (202) 842-1866. The text and materials assembled by Dinu C. Giurescu reflect the views of the author as sup­ ported by his independent research. Book design by DR Pollard and Associates, Inc. Jacket design by John T. Engeman. Printed by J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigrants and Ethnic Minorities European Country Cases and Debates Immigrants and Ethnic Minorities
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Simo Mannila brought to you by CORE Vera Messing provided by Julkari Hans-Peter van den Broek Immigrants and Zsuzsanna Vidra Ethnic Minorities European Country Cases and Debates Hans-Peter van den Broek, Zsuzsanna Vidra Zsuzsanna den Broek, van Hans-Peter Messing, Vera Simo Mannila, Simo Mannila Vera Messing Hans-Peter van den Broek REPORT Zsuzsanna Vidra REPORT Immigrants and Ethnic Minorities European Country Cases and Debates Immigrants and Ethnic Minorities Ethnic and Immigrants The collection of articles gives basic information concerning immigrants and ethnic minorities in the European Union and discusses their situation by means of case studies from Spain, Finland (with comparisons to Sweden and Norway), Hungary, Slovakia and Romania. The articles have been written in the context of the Network of Excellence Reconciling Work and Welfare in Europe (RECWOWE), funded by the 6th Framework Programme (FP6), by Simo Mannila (National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland), Hans-Peter van der Broek (University of Oviedo, Spain) and Vera Messing and Zsuzsanna Vidra (Hungarian Academy of Sciences). .!7BC5<2"HIGMFE! Sale of publications www.thl.fi/kirjakauppa 41 Tel. +358 20 610 6161 ISBN 978-952-245-392-1 41 | 2010 2010 41 | 2010 Fax. +358 20 610 7450 © Authors and National Institute for Health and Welfare Layout: Christine Strid ISBN 978-952-245-392-1 (printed) ISSN 1798-0070 (printed) ISBN 978-952-245-393-8 (pdf) ISSN 1798-0089 (pdf) University Print Helsinki, Finland 2010 Abstract Simo Mannila, Vera Messing, Hans-Peter van den Broek, Zsuzsanna Vidra.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume Ale Publicaţiilor Periodice Existente În Depozit Nr
    Volume ale publicaţiilor periodice existente în depozit Nr. crt. TITLULPUBLICAŢIEI ANUL PERIOADA NR.PUBLICAŢIEI NR. INV 1 24 ORE 1991 365 - 389 68737 27 [Şapte] plus 2005 MART.-APR. 7.-28 111693 37 [Şapte] plus 2005 TRIM II 30-99 111979 47 [Şapte] plus 2005 IUL.-AUG. 100-152 114738 57 [Şapte] plus 2005 SEPT.-OCT. 153-204 115052 67 [Şapte] plus 2005 NOV.-DEC. 205-255 115334 77 [Şapte] plus 2006 IAN.-FEB 256-303 118002 87 [Şapte] plus 2006 MART.-APR. 304-353 118124 97 [Şapte] plus 2006 MAI.-IUN. 354-405 118125 10 7 [Şapte] plus 2006 IUL.-AUG. 406-458 118126 11 7 [Şapte] plus 2006 SEPT.-OCT. , nr,459-510(an: 2006:Sep,-Oct,) 118127 12 7 [Şapte] plus 2006 NOV.-DEC. , nr,511-558(an: 2006:Nov,-Dec,) 118128 13 7 [Şapte] plus 2007 IAN.-FEB. , nr,559-606(anul:2007:Ian,-Feb,) 89503 14 7 [Şapte] plus 2007 MART.-APR. , nr,607-627;629-634;636-655(anul:2007:Mar,-Apr,) 89504 15 7 [Şapte] plus 2007 MAI.-IUN. , nr,657;659-684;687-697;699-709(anul:2007:Mai- 89505 Iunie) 16 7 [Şapte] plus 2007 IUL.-AUG. , nr,710-762(anul:2007:Iul,-Aug,) 89506 17 7 [Şapte] plus 2007 SEPT.-OCT. , nr,763-814(anul:2007:Sept,-Oct,) 89507 18 7 [Şapte] plus 2007 NOV.-DEC. , nr,816-860;862-863(anul: 2007:Nov,-Dec,) 89508 19 ACADEMIA CAŢAVENCU 1993 AN 2 - 51 87760 20 ACADEMIA CAŢAVENCU 1994 AN 1 - 52 116516 21 ACADEMIA CAŢAVENCU 1995 AN 1 - 50 87761 22 ACADEMIA CAŢAVENCU 1996 AN 1 - 52 87762 23 ACADEMIA CAŢAVENCU 1997 AN 1 - 51 87763 24 ACADEMIA CAŢAVENCU 1998 AN 1 - 52 87764 25 ACADEMIA CAŢAVENCU 1999 AN 1 - 52 87765 26 ACADEMIA CAŢAVENCU 2000 AN 1 - 52 87766 27 ACADEMIA CAŢAVENCU 2001 SEM.I 1 - 25 76347 28 ACADEMIA CAŢAVENCU 2001 SEM.II 26-50 76348 29 ACADEMIA CAŢAVENCU 2002 SEM I 1--25 103001 30 ACADEMIA CAŢAVENCU 2002 SEM II 26-51 103002 31 ACADEMIA CAŢAVENCU 2003 SEM I 1-25 104631 32 ACADEMIA CAŢAVENCU 2003 SEM II 26-52 104838 33 ACADEMIA CAŢAVENCU 2004 SEM I 1.-26 109809 34 ACADEMIA CAŢAVENCU 2004 SEM II 27--52; 110332 35 ACADEMIA CAŢAVENCU 2005 SEM I 1--25 111569 36 ACADEMIA CAŢAVENCU 2005 SEM II 26-51 114767 37 ACADEMIA CAŢAVENCU 2006 SEM I , Anul XVI nr.
    [Show full text]