Hakalau Forest National Wildlife Refuge (Ka Pu‘Uhonua Waonahele Aupuni ‘O Hakalau)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hakalau Forest National Wildlife Refuge (Ka Pu‘Uhonua Waonahele Aupuni ‘O Hakalau) U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Comprehensive Conservation Plan Refuge Forest Wildlife National Hakalau U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Hakalau Forest Big Island National Wildlife Refuge Complex 60 Nowelo Street, Suite 100 Hilo, Hawai‘i 96720 National Wildlife Refuge Phone: 808/443-2300 Fax: 808/443-2304 http://www.fws.gov/hakalauforest Comprehensive Conservation Plan National Wildlife Refuge System Information 1 800/344 WILD April 2011 Front Cover Photos: Back Cover Photos: ‘Akiapo¯la¯‘au ‘A¯kepa ©Jack Jeffrey ©Jack Jeffrey ‘I‘iwi ‘Io ©Michael Walther ©Michael Walther Ne¯ne¯ Hakalau Forest USFWS USFWS April 2011 A Vision of Conservation Hakalau Forest National Wildlife Refuge (Ka Pu‘uhonua Waonahele Aupuni ‘o Hakalau) Aia no¯ i uka i ke kua ko‘olau o Mauna Kea ka pu‘uhonua waonahele aupuni ‘o Hakalau. He wahi ke¯ia e hui ai ka¯naka e laulima ma o ke ka‘analike aku, ka‘analike mai i ka ‘ike, ka no‘eau, a me ka mana i mea e ho‘opalekana, ho‘oikaika, a ho‘o¯la hou ai i ke ola maoli e noho ana ma ka waonahele. Ua kapa ‘ia ka inoa ‘o Hakalau no ka nui o na¯ haka e noho ‘ia e na¯ manu ‘o¯iwi. I ke¯ia la¯ ‘o Hakalau kekahi o na¯ home nunui no ka hui manu Hawai‘i ‘ane make loa. Kı¯kaha a‘ela na¯ manu, na¯ pua laha ‘ole ho‘i, i ka ‘ohu‘ohu o Hakalau a ma lalo iki e mu¯kı¯kı¯ i ka wai pua ‘o¯hi‘a. Ua nani no¯ ka ‘ikena a ‘upu a‘ela no¯ ke aloha no ke¯ia ‘a¯ina nei no na¯ kau a kau. On the windward slope of majestic Mauna Kea, midway between summit and sea, lies Hakalau Forest NWR, a place where people come together to laulima, “many hands working together,” to share their knowledge, to share their skills, and to share their energy to protect, to enhance, to restore, and to respect Hawaiian wildlife. Known to Hawaiians as “place of many perches,” verdant rainforest supports the largest populations of endangered Hawaiian forest birds. Crimson, orange, yellow and green hued birds, the jewels of Hakalau, flit through the mist, pausing to sip nectar from ‘o¯hi‘a lehua, inspire joy and wonder for present and future generations. Kona Forest Unit (Ka Waonahele o Kona) Mai Mauna Kea no¯ a ka‘a i lalo, a hiki aku i Mauna Loa, ma laila no¯ ka waonahele o Kona, kahi e noho lewalewa ana na¯ ao ‘o¯pua i ka ‘uhiwai e ho¯‘olu‘olu ana i ka ulu la¯‘au. ‘Ike ‘ia ka ‘io e kı¯kaha ana ma luna loa o ka papa kaupoku i ho‘owehiwehi ‘ia me ka limu. Ma lalo o ke kaupoku koa me ‘o¯hi‘a, e ‘imi ana ka ‘alala¯ me kona hoa manu i ka hua‘ai, wai pua, a me na¯ mea kolokolo i mea ‘ai na la¯kou. Aia no¯ ma ka malumalu o na¯ ana kahe pele kahiko na¯ mea kanu ka¯ka‘ikahi o ka ‘a¯ina, a me na¯ iwi o na¯ manu make loa ma Hawai‘i. Kuahui maila no¯ na¯ hoa ma¯lama ‘a¯ina i ola hou ka nohona o na¯ mea ‘ane make loa ma ke¯ia ‘a¯ina nui a¯kea. On leeward Mauna Loa, where the clouds kiss the slopes with cool gray fog, lies the Kona Forest. ‘Alala¯ and other Hawaiian forest birds forage for fruit, nectar, and insects amongst the lichen-draped branches and canopy of the old-growth koa/‘o¯hi‘a forest, while the ‘io soars overhead. In their damp darkness, ancient lava tubes and cave systems shelter rare plants, archaeological resources, and the bones of extinct birds. Conservation partners collaborate to restore habitat for the native and endangered species across the landscape. Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long-term guidance for management decisions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes and identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffing increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition. ‘O¯hi‘a tree ©Lesa Moore Hakalau Forest National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan Executive Summary Hakalau Forest NWR Background: Hakalau Forest National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) consists of the Hakalau Forest Unit and the Kona Forest Unit, collectively managed as the Big Island National Wildlife Refuge Complex. The Hakalau Forest Unit was established in 1985 to protect and manage endangered forest birds and their rainforest habitat. Located on the windward slope of Mauna Kea, Island of Hawai‘i, this 32,733-acre unit supports a diversity of native birds and plants (27 of which are listed under the Endangered Species Act). The Kona Forest Unit was set aside in 1997 to protect native forest birds, the endangered ‘alalā (Corvus hawaiiensis, Hawaiian crow), and several listed plants. Located on the leeward slope of Mauna Loa, this 5,300-acre unit supports diverse native bird and plant species, as well as rare lava tube and lava tube skylight habitats. Comprehensive Conservation Planning Process Summary: Initial preplanning activities began in 2007. This period included team development and identification of management issues, vision, goals, and objectives. Public involvement began in 2009 with the scoping process and publication of our notice of intent to prepare a CCP. This period involved mailings of the planning update, a news release and website posting, two public open houses, an interagency scoping meeting, and briefings of public officials. In 2010, the draft CCP/EA was developed and circulated for public comment. Notification of this document as well as solicitation of public comment during the 30 day comment period was accomplished through a planning update, a notice of availability in the Federal Register, a news release and website posting, holding of a public open house meeting, and circulating announcements via email and list serves. Refuge responses to public comments received were incorporated as part of Appendix K. Alternative Selected (Summary of Management): Three alternatives were analyzed during the CCP process and public comment review period. Alternative B (the Refuge’s preferred alternative) was chosen for implementation. This alternative focuses on protecting additional habitat; increasing management activities related to restoration and reforestation as well as controlling threats such as feral ungulates, invasive weed species, predator mammals, and other pests; better focusing and prioritizing of data collection and research for adaptive management; and expanding public use activities and collaborative partnering. The vision (with Hawaiian translation) for Hakalau Forest NWR: Hakalau Forest National Wildlife Refuge (Ka Pu‘uhonua Waonahele Aupuni ‘o Hakalau) Aia nō i uka i ke kua ko‘olau o Mauna Kea ka pu‘uhonua waonahele aupuni ‘o Hakalau. He wahi kēia e hui ai kānaka e laulima ma o ke ka‘analike aku, ka‘analike mai i ka ‘ike, ka no‘eau, a me ka mana i mea e ho‘opalekana, ho‘oikaika, a ho‘ōla hou ai i ke ola maoli e noho ana ma ka waonahele. Ua kapa ‘ia ka inoa ‘o Hakalau no ka nui o nā haka e noho ‘ia e nā manu ‘ōiwi. I kēia lā ‘o Hakalau kekahi o nā home nunui no ka hui manu Hawai‘i ‘ane make loa. Kīkaha a‘ela nā manu, nā pua laha ‘ole ho‘i, i ka ‘ohu‘ohu o Hakalau a ma lalo iki e mūkīkī i ka wai pua ‘ōhi‘a. Ua nani nō ka ‘ikena a ‘upu a‘ela nō ke aloha no kēia ‘āina nei no nā kau a kau. Executive Summary Hakalau Forest National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan On the windward slope of majestic Mauna Kea, midway between summit and sea, lies Hakalau Forest NWR, a place where people come together to laulima, “many hands working together,” to share their knowledge, to share their skills, and to share their energy to protect, to enhance, to restore, and to respect Hawaiian wildlife. Known to Hawaiians as “place of many perches,” verdant rainforest supports the largest populations of endangered Hawaiian forest birds. Crimson, orange, yellow, and green hued birds, the jewels of Hakalau, flit through the mist, pausing to sip nectar from ‘ōhi‘a lehua, inspire joy and wonder for present and future generations. Kona Forest Unit (Ka Waonahele o Kona) Mai Mauna Kea nō a ka‘a i lalo, a hiki aku i Mauna Loa, ma laila nō ka waonahele o Kona, kahi e noho lewalewa ana nā ao ‘ōpua i ka ‘uhiwai e hō‘olu‘olu ana i ka ulu lā‘au. ‘Ike ‘ia ka ‘io e kīkaha ana ma luna loa o ka papa kaupoku i ho‘owehiwehi ‘ia me ka limu. Ma lalo o ke kaupoku koa me ‘ōhi‘a, e ‘imi ana ka ‘alalā me kona hoa manu i ka hua‘ai, wai pua, a me nā mea kolokolo i mea ‘ai na lākou. Aia nō ma ka malumalu o nā ana kahe pele kahiko nā mea kanu kāka‘ikahi o ka ‘āina, a me nā iwi o nā manu make loa ma Hawai‘i. Kuahui maila nō nā hoa mālama ‘āina i ola hou ka nohona o nā mea ‘ane make loa ma kēia ‘āina nui ākea. On leeward Mauna Loa, where the clouds kiss the slopes with cool gray fog, lies the Kona Forest. ‘Alalā and other Hawaiian forest birds forage for fruit, nectar, and insects amongst the lichen-draped branches and canopy of the old-growth koa/‘ōhi‘a forest while the ‘io soars overhead.
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Plants for Hawaiian Lei ‘A‘Ali‘I
    6 Growing Plants for Hawaiian Lei ‘a‘ali‘i OTHER COMMON NAMES: ‘a‘ali‘i kū range of habitats from dunes at sea makani, ‘a‘ali‘i kū ma kua, kū- level up through leeward and dry makani, hop bush, hopseed bush forests and to the highest peaks SCIENTIFIC NAME: Dodonaea viscosa CURRENT STATUS IN THE WILD IN HAWAI‘I: common FAMILY: Sapindaceae (soapberry family) CULTIVARS: female cultivars such as ‘Purpurea’ and ‘Saratoga’ have NATURAL SETTING/LOCATION: indigenous, been selected for good fruit color pantropical species, found on all the main Hawaiian Islands except Kaho‘olawe; grows in a wide Growing your own PROPAGATION FORM: seeds; semi-hardwood cuttings or air layering for selected color forms PREPLANTING TREATMENT: step on seed capsule to release small, round, black seeds, or use heavy gloves and rub capsules vigorously between hands; put seeds in water that has been brought to a boil and removed from heat, soak for about 24 hours; if seeds start to swell, sow imme- diately; discard floating, nonviable seeds; use strong rooting hormone on cuttings TEMPERATURE: PLANTING DEPTH: sow seeds ¼" deep in tolerates dry heat; tem- after fruiting period to shape or keep medium; insert base of cutting 1–2" perature 32–90°F short; can be shaped into a small tree or maintained as a shrub, hedge, or into medium ELEVATION: 10–7700' espalier (on a trellis) GERMINATION TIME: 2–4 weeks SALT TOLERANCE: good (moderate at SPECIAL CULTURAL HINTS: male and female CUTTING ROOTING TIME: 1½–3 months higher elevations) plants are separate, although bisex- WIND RESISTANCE:
    [Show full text]
  • Koa Bug Investigation Section
    Koa Bug Investigation Supplemental information on this investigation can be found in the Koa Bug Images file (PDF). Concepts Analyze how an organisms’ body structure contribute to their ability to survive and reproduce. (Benchmark SC.7.5.4) Explain the interaction and dependence of organisms on one another. (Benchmark SC.7.3.2) Explain how energy moves through food webs. (Benchmark SC.7.3.1) Design and safely conduct a scientific investigation to answer a question or test a hypothesis. (Benchmark SC.7.1.1) Overview Students are introduced to the endemic Koa bug (Coleotichus blackburniae), Hawaii’s largest true bug, and they will investigate their structure and function, life cycles, and the dependence of organisms on one another. Students will build suitable habitat for the insects and make daily observations of their change, eventually identifying males from females and understanding the insect’s life cycle. In addition, information gathered from this investigation will be utilized in a future lesson on “populations”. Purpose To have students identify adaptive strategies of insects and why these features are important to insect survival. The students will understand that an organism is a living thing and that energy moves through a food web. Furthermore, they will gain an understanding of organism interactions and that each is dependent on one another. The observations they make will allow them to understand what an organism does, how it responds to its environment, and report the observable biological changes that have occurred. Students
    [Show full text]
  • Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment
    PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A, NORTH KONA, HAWAII Prepared by: Jon G. Giffin Forestry & Wildlife Manager August 2003 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ii GENERAL SETTING...................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Land Use Practices...............................................................................................................1 Geology..................................................................................................................................3 Lava Flows............................................................................................................................5 Lava Tubes ...........................................................................................................................5 Cinder Cones ........................................................................................................................7 Soils .......................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • A Landscape-Based Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability for All Native Hawaiian Plants
    Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDscape-bASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMatE CHANGE VULNEraBILITY FOR ALL NatIVE HAWAIIAN PLANts Lucas Fortini1,2, Jonathan Price3, James Jacobi2, Adam Vorsino4, Jeff Burgett1,4, Kevin Brinck5, Fred Amidon4, Steve Miller4, Sam `Ohukani`ohi`a Gon III6, Gregory Koob7, and Eben Paxton2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawai‘i at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service —Ecological Services, Division of Climate Change and Strategic Habitat Management, Honolulu, HI 96850 5 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawai‘i National Park, HI 96718 6 The Nature Conservancy, Hawai‘i Chapter, Honolulu, HI 96817 7 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Hawaii/Pacific Islands Area State Office, Honolulu, HI 96850 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit University of Hawai‘i at Hilo 200 W. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 933-0706 November 2013 This product was prepared under Cooperative Agreement CAG09AC00070 for the Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center of the U.S. Geological Survey. Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDSCAPE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY FOR ALL NATIVE HAWAIIAN PLANTS LUCAS FORTINI1,2, JONATHAN PRICE3, JAMES JACOBI2, ADAM VORSINO4, JEFF BURGETT1,4, KEVIN BRINCK5, FRED AMIDON4, STEVE MILLER4, SAM ʽOHUKANIʽOHIʽA GON III 6, GREGORY KOOB7, AND EBEN PAXTON2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaiʽi National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawaiʽi at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Inventory and Assessment Report, Fall 2018 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory, Maunakea, Hawai‘I
    Biological Inventory and Assessment Report, Fall 2018 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory, Maunakea, Hawai‘i Action BoardApril 2019 Prepared for: Sustainable Resources Group Intn’l, Inc. Prepared by: Matthew J Medeiros, PhD [email protected] mattjmedeiros.comFor All photographs in this report are copyrighted by Matthew J Medeiros. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory Decommissioning ................................................................ 1 1.2 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................................. 1 2 METHODS ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Permit and Personnel .................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Schedule ........................................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Nomenclature ................................................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Methodology for Inventorying Plants, Lichens, Non-arthropod Animals, and Abiotic Features . 3 2.4.1 Transects: Floral and Abiotic Features ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plants of Southeastern Polynesia. 3
    Plants of Southeastern Polynesia. 3. F. R. FoSBERG1 and M.-H. SACHET1 Abstract In this paper are presented critical notes and records of species of Ophioglossum (Ophi­ oglossaceae), Waltheria (Sterculiaceae), Alyxia (Apocynaceae) and Morinda (Rubiaceae), a new varietal combination and two new varieties in Alyxia stellata, and a discussion of the generic separation of Ochrosia and Neiosperma (Apocynaceae). Ophioglossum pendulum var. falcatum (Presl) Fosberg, 0cc. Pap. Bishop Mus. 23 :29, 1962. 0. pendulum L. f. var. pendulum is common at low and moderate elevations in Tahiti. A collection from 1100 m elevation, south of Orohena, MacDaniels 1533 (US) is perfectly typical var. falcatum, apparently the first record of this variety from the Society Islands and from southern Polynesia. It is by far the commoner form in the Hawaiian Islands. The typical form, var. pendulum, with long pendant sterile parts of the fronds is common in Tahiti but very rare in Hawaii. Waltheria tomentosa (J. R. & G. Forst.) St. John, Nat. Can. 98:573, 1971.2 Lophanthus tomentosus J. R. & G. Forst., Char. Gen. 14, 1775; 28, pl. 14, 1776. Waltheria lophanthus Forst. f., Prodr. 47, 1786. It is surprising that no one had made this transfer. Of course, the application of the " Kew Rule" would have made it inappropriate prior to the formulation of the modern International Rules of Botanical Nomenclature at the Vienna Congress in 1905. However, there seems to be no reason for not now taking up the oldest available epithet for this plant. This species is still to be found on the dry sides of most of the Marquesas and on the smaller, low dry islands of the group.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeographic Origin, Taxonomic Status, and Conservation Biology of Asplenium Monanthes L
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1-1-2003 Biogeographic origin, taxonomic status, and conservation biology of Asplenium monanthes L. in the southeastern United States Allison Elizabeth Shaw Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Recommended Citation Shaw, Allison Elizabeth, "Biogeographic origin, taxonomic status, and conservation biology of Asplenium monanthes L. in the southeastern United States" (2003). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 20038. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/20038 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Biogeographic origin, taxonomic status, and conservation biology of Asplenium monanthes L. in the southeastern United States by Allison Elizabeth Shaw A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Program of Study Committee: Donald R. Farrar (Major Professor) John D. Nason Fredric J. Janzen Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2003 11 Graduate College Iowa State University This is to certify that the master's thesis of Allison Elizabeth Shaw has met the thesis requirements of Iowa State University Signatures have been redacted for privacy iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES v LIST OF TABLES Vlll ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ix ABSTRACT xi GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 Research questions 1 Thesis organization 2 Taxonomy of Asplenium monanthes 2 Apo gamy 6 Distribution and habitat of Asplenium monanthes 12 Bioclimatic history of the southeastern U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Erebidae, Arctiinae) SHILAP Revista De Lepidopterología, Vol
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España González, E.; Beccacece, H. M. First record of Dysschema sacrifica (Hübner, [1831]) on Soybean ( Glycine max (L.) Merr) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae, Arctiinae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 45, núm. 179, septiembre, 2017, pp. 403-408 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45552790005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative SHILAP Revta. lepid., 45 (179) septiembre 2017: 403-408 eISSN: 2340-4078 ISSN: 0300-5267 First record of Dysschema sacrifica (Hübner, [1831]) on Soybean ( Glycine max (L.) Merr) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae, Arctiinae) E. González & H. M. Beccacece Abstract The presence of Dysschema sacrifica (Hübner, [1831]) on soybean ( Glycine max (L.) Merr) is reported for the first time. Larvae of this species were found consuming soybean leaves in soybean fields in Córdoba province, Argentina, and were able to complete their life cycle. Characteristics of adults and larvae are provided for rapid identification in the field. Due to the widespread distribution of this species within the region where soybean is more intensively cultivated in South America, we conclude that D. sacrifica is a potential soybean pest. Further studies on infestation frequency, damage levels and control by natural enemies are needed. KEY WORDS: Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Arctiidae, Dysschema sacrifica , soybean, pest, Argentina. Primer registro de Dysschema sacrifica (Hübner, [1831]) en soja ( Glycine max (L.) Merr) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae, Arctiinae) Resumen Se reporta por primera vez la presencia de Dysschema sacrifica (Hübner, [1831]) en soja ( Glycine max (L.) Merr).
    [Show full text]
  • Harper's Island Wetlands Butterflies & Moths (2020)
    Introduction Harper’s Island Wetlands (HIW) nature reserve, situated close to the village of Glounthaune on the north shore of Cork Harbour is well known for its birds, many of which come from all over northern Europe and beyond, but there is a lot more to the wildlife at the HWI nature reserve than birds. One of our goals it to find out as much as we can about all aspects of life, both plant and animal, that live or visit HIW. This is a report on the butterflies and moths of HIW. Butterflies After birds, butterflies are probably the one of the best known flying creatures. While there has been no structured study of them on at HIW, 17 of Ireland’s 33 resident and regular migrant species of Irish butterflies have been recorded. Just this summer we added the Comma butterfly to the island list. A species spreading across Ireland in recent years possibly in response to climate change. Hopefully we can set up regular monitoring of the butterflies at HIW in the next couple of years. Butterfly Species Recorded at Harper’s Island Wetlands up to September 2020. Colias croceus Clouded Yellow Pieris brassicae Large White Pieris rapae Small White Pieris napi Green-veined White Anthocharis cardamines Orange-tip Lycaena phlaeas Small Copper Polyommatus icarus Common Blue Celastrina argiolus Holly Blue Vanessa atalanta Red Admiral Vanessa cardui Painted Lady Aglais io Peacock Aglais urticae Small Tortoiseshell Polygonia c-album Comma Speyeria aglaja Dark-green Fritillary Pararge aegeria Speckled Wood Maniola jurtina Meadow Brown Aphantopus hyperantus Ringlet Moths One group of insects that are rarely seen by visitors to HIW is the moths.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Hawaiian Lobelioids — in Vitro and Molecular Studies
    CONSERVATION OF HAWAIIAN LOBELIOIDS — IN VITRO AND MOLECULAR STUDIES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAW ATI IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN HORTICULTURE MAY 1996 By Gregory A. Koob Dissertation Committee: Yoneo Sagawa, Co-Chairperson Sterling Keeley, Co-Chairperson Adelheid Kuehnle Fred Rauch Clifford Smith We certify that we have read this dissertation and that, in our opinion, it is satisfactory in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Horticulture. DISSERTATION COMMITTEE I (^Chairperson^ !^-Chairperson AkjJU^jA ■ UilU 11 © Copyright 1996 by Gregory A. Koob All Rights Reserved 111 Acknowledgments I would like to thank the staff and volunteers at the Harold L. Lyon Arboretum and the Lyon Arboretum Association for their support of the in vitro research. The staff of the National Tropical Botanical Garden, the State of Hawai'i Division of Forestry and Wildlife, the Nature Conservancy of Hawai'i, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, John Obata, and Rick Palmer are appreciated for supplying plant material. Partial funding was supplied by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the State of Hawai'i Division of Forestry and Wildlife, the Center for Plant Conservation, the University of Hawai'i Foundation, and Sigma Xi Grants-in-Aid of Research. Thank you to Dave Lorence, Kay Lynch, Loyal Mehrhoff, Carol Nakamura, John Obata, Rick Palmer, Joshlyn Sands, and Alvin Yoshinaga for information used in this report. Special thanks to Sterling Keeley for the use of her lab and supplies and support for the RAPDs work and to Yoneo Sagawa for his knowledgeable support of the in vitro research.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonally Dependent Relationship Between Insect Herbivores and Host Plant Density in Jatropha Nana, a Tropical Perennial Herb Ashish N
    © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Biology Open (2018) 7, bio035071. doi:10.1242/bio.035071 RESEARCH ARTICLE Seasonally dependent relationship between insect herbivores and host plant density in Jatropha nana, a tropical perennial herb Ashish N. Nerlekar ABSTRACT Out of the several hypotheses that seek to explain the relation The fact that plant spatial aggregation patterns shape insect- between host plant heterogeneity, spatial complexity and insect- ‘ herbivore communities in a variety of ways has resulted in a large herbivore characteristics, three key hypotheses are the enemies ’ ‘ ’ body of literature on the subject. The landmark resource hypothesis , the resource concentration hypothesis , and the ‘ ’ concentration hypothesis predicts that density of insect herbivores resource dilution hypothesis (Elton, 1958; Root, 1973; Otway ‘ ’ per plant will increase as host plant density increases. I examined this et al., 2005; Björkman et al., 2010). The enemies hypothesis prediction across temporal samplings using Jatropha nana and the predicts that because of higher predator and parasite efficiency associated specialist insect herbivores as a system. Through 12 field in diverse environments, insect herbivores are less abundant in samplings, I modelled the effect of host plant density on insect- species-diverse plant communities than in simple (e.g. monoculture) ‘ ’ herbivore loads. The initial samplings (2–3) provided evidence for the communities (Elton, 1958). The resource concentration hypothesis resource concentration hypothesis, with insect loads increasing with (RCH) goes further to consider host patch size and plant density as increasing host plant density, whereas the later samplings (4–5, predictors of herbivore abundance, along with plant diversity (Root, 7–11) showed the opposite; a resource dilution pattern with a decline 1973).
    [Show full text]