DOCSLIB.ORG

Frankenstein − Rehearsal Insights

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Frankenstein − Rehearsal Insights Frankenstein − Rehearsal Insights Contents About.............................................................................................1 Rehearsal Diary .................................................................2 Interviews ...........................................................................7 Danny Boyle.................................................................7 Nick Dear ...................................................................11 Suttirat Anne Larlarb.................................................16 1 Frankenstein − Rehearsal Insights Frankenstein − Rehearsal Insights AboutInterview with Suttirat This learning pack supports the National Theatre’s production of Frankenstein, directed by Danny Boyle, which opened on 22nd February 2011 at the National’s Olivier Theatre in London. These insights were prepared during rehearsals by staff director Abbey Wright. They introduce the process of creating, rehearsing and staging this play. 1 Frankenstein − Rehearsal Insights Rehearsal Diary Week One Nick [Dear, writer] has been writing his version of Frankenstein for nearly 15 years – I have heard a rumour he is on draft number 147! Actors Benedict Cumberbatch and Jonny Lee Miller will alternate the roles of The Creature and Victor Frankenstein. Over the years, he and Danny [Boyle, director] began to see aspects of the Creature’s character and situation as relating to autism. Danny is keen for Benedict and Jonny to be able to meet children with autism and Asperger's syndrome as part of their rehearsal process. We visit Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee School to look at how this could work. The school is a wonderful place, and we are able to meet some of the students and teachers. Back at the rehearsal room we meet with Underworld, who are composing the music for the production. Rehearsal room one is big with a high ceiling and its own revolve to imitate the stage of the Olivier. Danny suggests to Underworld the idea of a train representing Ingolstadt and the Industrial Revolution, to run down the central tracks from the Upstage doors and shoot out into the audience. Rather than taking the Creature outside onto the street, we bring the town to him. The train can have both live and recorded sound and be a powerful presence physically. Toby Sedgwick, the Director of Movement begins work with Jonny and Benedict by exploring the neutral mask. The Creature is an innocent. He is like an adult baby, with no sense of who he is or the world around him, and he must discover everything. Being able to start from a position of neutrality is a useful tool for this. I join Alastair Coomer (Deputy Head of Casting) to meet some actors for parts which are yet to be cast, and for understudy roles. Danny is keen to start immersing the actors in other elements of production as early as possible and we do a make-up test for the 22 FrankensteinFrankenstein − Rehearsal Insights InterviewRehearsal with Diary Suttirat Creature. There is discussion about the pattern and size of the scarring but it is apparent that the concept for the Creature make-up is a work of art. Designs by Suttirat Anne Larlarb Week Two We work for a week just with Benedict and Jonny. This is concentrated work, which Danny keeps fresh by mixing up research trips, text work, and physical work with Toby. Danny says the play is a two-hander and he wants the two of them to dominate the cavernous Olivier auditorium. During this period of rehearsal, before the rest of the company join, they have the opportunity to work intensively with Toby. They each begin to find their own distinctive physicality for the Creature 3 FrankensteinFrankenstein − Rehearsal Insights InterviewRehearsal with Diary Suttirat through a series of organic physical exercises; levels of tension, fear and joy, and work with elements. Both are playful and physically intelligent actors and this work provides the basis for devising a sequence of movement which will represent the Creature’s birth. Danny and Nick want to tell the story from the Creature’s point of view and to give him his voice back, so it is important that we begin the production at the start of the Creature’s journey and watch him learning to speak and discover the world. This work is very exposing for the actors and very personal, and it is thrilling to watch it develop. Speech therapist Annie Morrison visits rehearsals. She talks about the stages of development in a child’s brain and stresses the rapidity of the development of speech in a child. Danny suggests that the Creature exceeds our expectations, and one of the great strengths of the play is that every time we see the Creature he has shot forward. Through the De Lacey scenes he learns to speak and he always surprises us, knowing more than we expect him to. Nick and Danny want the audience to feel great empathy for the Creature – we shouldn't see him as a monster but as a child who learns from others. The rehearsal room walls are covered in images which have inspired Danny and his design team and which act as a portal for the actors, offering them a visceral reference of the world we’re creating. These images are of skin, stitching on the body, strange tattoos, foetuses, autopsies, death and are horrifying but human and compellingly beautiful. Using these images the company can begin to get a sense that it isn’t a naturalistic world we’re creating, but more of an adult fairytale. Danny feels compelled to give the Creature his voice back, and strip away the crude monster ticks of the movies. Rehearsing the roles of Victor and the Creature in tandem with the two actors is a fascinating process. I heard Danny say that it breaks the monolithic concentration an actor has on his own role within the process. The rewards of working this way, with two such extraordinary actors, are huge. They are extremely generous with one another and 4 FrankensteinFrankenstein − Rehearsal Insights InterviewRehearsal with Diary Suttirat share the discoveries they make about each character. But the major advantage, I would suggest, is that they know the play and these two characters inside out. When they are on stage together, they are really listening to each other, and the connection between them is electric. Week Three This week we welcome the rest of the company into rehearsals. It's wonderful to hear the play as it will be and to meet the cast. We start some initial ensemble rehearsals and research before a break for Chistmas. At this stage we aks a lot of questions about the play. Why does Victor agree to make the Female Creature? Why does he then destroy her? Why does the Creature rape Elizabeth? We talk a lot about Victor’s fear of love and the Creature’s great capacity for love. Perhaps this is why Victor destroys the Female Creature. Week Four Back in the New Year and the production is fast upon us… We work intensively, stitching scenes together and Benedict and Jonny have little time to stop. The play thrives on a muscular, fast-paced delivery and so we are working towards achieving that. 5 FrankensteinFrankenstein − Rehearsal Insights InterviewRehearsal with Diary Suttirat Danny encourages the company to look at how they use the word ‘Monster’ when it appears in the play. He doesn’t want any general monster-bashing. We explore the specificity of that term and why each person says it; is it out of fear? And fear of what? Difference? Danny also asks the company to look for wonder in their performances. His big note of the week is ‘Why so serious?’ The company are enjoying discovering the humour of the play. Week Five We are now into running the play and it is thrilling. It strikes me as a bleak journey from the womb to some sort of purgatory. We focus on goodness. Are we all born good? What about self-destruction and the human tendency toward vice? This is what constitutes the tragedy of the play for me: the fact that the two men destroy themselves. I start to work with the understudies, which is rewarding on a show this powerful. They are enjoying finding their way through the play, and embracing the more physical elements. Week Six We open our rehearsal room doors to other people from the building. The double-casting of course means double the runs. With each run the piece feels fuller, faster and more moving. Danny and Mark Tildesley (the Set Designer) have designed a huge mirror wedge decked with three and a half thousand light bulbs to hang over the stage and auditorium. Danny explained that he wanted the advent of electricity to be hanging over the production. Each light bulb will be wired individually in situ in the Olivier. We are now at the point where the company need all of the elements: the fire, the birds, the rain, the revolve. And we are all excited to move into the theatre. 6 Frankenstein − Rehearsal Insights Interview with SuttiratDanny Boyle Interview with Danny Boyle, Director Why Frankenstein? There have been so many versions of it. Nick and I have been working on this one for a long time but stopped because of the latest cinematic version, the Kenneth Branagh/Robert De Niro one which just scared everybody off for a bit. So we actually dropped it for a number of years. It was the fact that it’s a great story. The adaptation was a chance to do two things. One was to give the Creature his voice back which he clearly does have in the Shelley book and yet the movies often ignore that. More recently, they’ve given him his voice back but he’s retained the monster ticks – so he evokes pity often, but rarely do you see things from his point of view. So it was a chance not just to give him back his voice but to actually make him the engine of the whole story, he’s the axle of the story because you begin it with his birth – which is dissatisfying to a lot of scholars.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Four Sherlock Holmes and a Vampire (Who Is Also One of the Aforementioned Sherlock Holmes) a One-Page RPG Inspired by Justin Mcelroy V 1.2 Written by Andrew J
    Four Sherlock Holmes and a Vampire (Who Is Also One of the Aforementioned Sherlock Holmes) A one-page RPG inspired by Justin McElroy v 1.2 written by Andrew J. Young (with thanks to Marty McGuire) The Game In Four Sherlock Holmes and a Vampire (Who Is Also One of the Aforementioned Sherlock Holmes)—officially abbreviated Four Sherlock Holmes and a Vampire—four players play four Sherlock Holmes who team up to solve mysteries and one-up each other. Secretly, one or more Sherlock Holmes are Suspicious Quirks (d6) vampires. Can the four Sherlock Holmes find out who among them is a creature of the night? This game requires paper, pencils, a d6, and a d20. 1. You loathe the smell of garlic. 2. You’re a Transylvanian citizen. Getting Started 3. You’re allergic to vitamin D. Everyone describes their Sherlock Holmes. Players can each play a version of (No sunlight for you!) Sherlock Holmes (Benedict Cumberbatch, Robert Downey Jr., Basil Rathbone, 4. You are a bat enthusiast. Peter Cushing, etc.), or they can create their own wry, observant detective. 5. You have a neck fetish. Everyone rolls in secret to determine their Suspicious Quirk. 6. You are a vampire. (Plus, Setting the Scene choose two of the above.) These four Sherlock Holmes join forces to investigate a terrible crime. One player describes the crime scene in as much detail as they like (leaving out the crime) and then rolls on the Scene Details table. Another player chooses which of those two details to incorporate and then rolls on the Scene Details table again.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography for the Study of Shakespeare on Film in Asia and Hollywood
    CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture ISSN 1481-4374 Purdue University Press ©Purdue University Volume 6 (2004) Issue 1 Article 13 Bibliography for the Study of Shakespeare on Film in Asia and Hollywood Lucian Ghita Purdue University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, and the Critical and Cultural Studies Commons Dedicated to the dissemination of scholarly and professional information, Purdue University Press selects, develops, and distributes quality resources in several key subject areas for which its parent university is famous, including business, technology, health, veterinary medicine, and other selected disciplines in the humanities and sciences. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, the peer-reviewed, full-text, and open-access learned journal in the humanities and social sciences, publishes new scholarship following tenets of the discipline of comparative literature and the field of cultural studies designated as "comparative cultural studies." Publications in the journal are indexed in the Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature (Chadwyck-Healey), the Arts and Humanities Citation Index (Thomson Reuters ISI), the Humanities Index (Wilson), Humanities International Complete (EBSCO), the International Bibliography of the Modern Language Association of America, and Scopus (Elsevier). The journal is affiliated with the Purdue University Press monograph series of Books in Comparative Cultural Studies. Contact: <[email protected]> Recommended Citation Ghita, Lucian. "Bibliography for the Study of Shakespeare on Film in Asia and Hollywood." CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 6.1 (2004): <https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1216> The above text, published by Purdue University Press ©Purdue University, has been downloaded 2531 times as of 11/ 07/19.
    [Show full text]
  • Losing Willwalking a Tightrope to Fame
    A&E [email protected] thursday, 29 november, 2007 Social Losing Will walking a tightrope to fame intercourSe Joe Vanderhelm talks botched audio, improvising scripts, and hoping that his locally filmed Grant MacEwan/University of Alberta Big Band Concert flick—complete with Edmonton scenery and music—has enough pull to reach cult status Monday, 3 December at 7:30pm John L Haar Theatre (10045 155 Street) filmpreview Performing together on the same stage, the Grant Losing Will MacEwan big band and the University of Alberta Runs 7–9 December big band will combine this coming Monday, creat- Directed by Mike Robertson and Arlen Konopaki ing a band the size of which can’t be described with Starring Arlen Konopaki, Joe Vanderhelm, and a simple adjective like big. Rather, it would require a Julian Faid conglomeration of descriptors, like “ginormous” or Metro Cinema “hugelarge.” Conducted by professors Raymond Baril and Dr Tom Dust, the humungollossal group will play BRYAN SAUNDERS a wide selection of jazz standards and should provide Arts & Entertainment Staff an entertaining night for fans of the genre. As Joe Vanderhelm, one of the stars of Highwire Films’ Losing Will, puts it, producing a local Trooper independent movie is a lot like walking on a Thursday, 29 November at 8pm tightrope. Century Casino (13103 Fort Road) “When you think of [a] high-wire act, there’s the chance of falling and the chance of failure, Here they come, classic rock group Trooper, driving in a but that always just makes it all the more inter- bright white sports car on their way through Edmonton.
    [Show full text]
  • Cinematic Hamlet Arose from Two Convictions
    INTRODUCTION Cinematic Hamlet arose from two convictions. The first was a belief, confirmed by the responses of hundreds of university students with whom I have studied the films, that theHamlet s of Lau- rence Olivier, Franco Zeffirelli, Kenneth Branagh, and Michael Almereyda are remarkably success- ful films.1 Numerous filmHamlet s have been made using Shakespeare’s language, but only the four included in this book represent for me out- standing successes. One might admire the fine acting of Nicol Williamson in Tony Richard- son’s 1969 production, or the creative use of ex- treme close-ups of Ian McKellen in Peter Wood’s Hallmark Hall of Fame television production of 1 Introduction 1971, but only four English-language films have thoroughly transformed Shakespeare’s theatrical text into truly effective moving pictures. All four succeed as popularizing treatments accessible to what Olivier’s collabora- tor Alan Dent called “un-Shakespeare-minded audiences.”2 They succeed as highly intelligent and original interpretations of the play capable of delight- ing any audience. Most of all, they are innovative and eloquent translations from the Elizabethan dramatic to the modern cinematic medium. It is clear that these directors have approached adapting Hamlet much as actors have long approached playing the title role, as the ultimate challenge that allows, as Almereyda observes, one’s “reflexes as a film-maker” to be “tested, battered and bettered.”3 An essential factor in the success of the films after Olivier’s is the chal- lenge of tradition. The three films that followed the groundbreaking 1948 version are what a scholar of film remakes labels “true remakes”: works that pay respectful tribute to their predecessors while laboring to surpass them.4 As each has acknowledged explicitly and as my analyses demonstrate, the three later filmmakers self-consciously defined their places in a vigorously evolving tradition of Hamlet films.
    [Show full text]
  • THE “TENET” THEORY Written by Esmarelda Villalobos
    THE “TENET” THEORY Written by Esmarelda VillaLobos WARNING: MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD. “Tenet” begins with an attack on the arts. It is the first event in the film, right out of the gate, that sets the tone for the rest of the movie. In fact, in this film there are multiple attacks on art, but in the first few minutes of this topsy-turvy ride, we as the audience witness some kind of terrorist attack that occurs during the preparations for an orchestral performance somewhere in Russia, which, given the number of public shootings and horrific terrorist attacks that have plagued the world throughout the last decade, is not that far of a stretch from the truth. The first line of the film is “Time to wake up the Americans” to which we are now introduced to John David Washington’s character as The Protagonist. Through a series of what seems to be party-switching and criss-crossery (if that’s even a word), John David Washington is eventually caught. While under capture and interrogation, The Protagonist decides to sacrifice his own life for the good of the cause and swallow a cyanide pill given to him by the CIA. Cut to black. When we as the audience come back, John David Washington is in a hospital bed on a very large ship, somewhere beyond the sea. Now, on first viewing if you are to watch this film, you believe everything that is said – the cyanide pill is a fake, his taking it was a test to see if he would sacrifice himself in order to avoid torture and potentially give up secrets – which he did.
    [Show full text]
  • Copy of Copy of Copy of Streetwear Creative Wide Presentation
    "Life's most persistent and urgent question is; what are you doing for others?" -MLK OUR VISION For over a decade, MDC has helped establish rewarding relationships between thousands of individuals, businesses and charities who care deeply about the well-being of others and the community. Through our work (video production, event planning & consulting) we want to share stories that matter, organize events that build bridges, highlight extraordinary individuals, create simple and effective ways of giving back, and act as professional matchmakers. Our mission has always been to connect the people who want to help with the people who need help the most. From the start, we've witnessed heartbreaking scenarios where trauma and hardship causes a child or family to feel isolated and hopeless. Despite what we're taught, time is more precious than gold and we strive to make every day, hour and minute count. The world does not stop when tragedy strikes; but good people can and do. We enlist the help of caregivers across every business sector around the globe and rely on them to help us create special moments in time that bring hope and joy to those suffering through hardship. We've created an Active Response Team; an unofficial team of do-gooders who are willing to step up to the plate when needed. And just like the word "team" signifies, together everyone achieves more. MDC works by cause, not by client -- and in doing so, it allows us to foster collaboration and look after the interests of all involved. The impact we make by working together is more powerful and far-reaching than most individuals can achieve on their own.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Gods and Monsters: Signification in Franz Waxman's Film Score Bride of Frankenstein
    This is a repository copy of Of Gods and Monsters: Signification in Franz Waxman’s film score Bride of Frankenstein. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/118268/ Version: Accepted Version Article: McClelland, C (Cover date: 2014) Of Gods and Monsters: Signification in Franz Waxman’s film score Bride of Frankenstein. Journal of Film Music, 7 (1). pp. 5-19. ISSN 1087-7142 https://doi.org/10.1558/jfm.27224 © Copyright the International Film Music Society, published by Equinox Publishing Ltd 2017, This is an author produced version of a paper published in the Journal of Film Music. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Paper for the Journal of Film Music Of Gods and Monsters: Signification in Franz Waxman’s film score Bride of Frankenstein Universal’s horror classic Bride of Frankenstein (1935) directed by James Whale is iconic not just because of its enduring images and acting, but also because of the high quality of its score by Franz Waxman.
    [Show full text]
  • Susannah Buxton - Costume Designer
    SUSANNAH BUXTON - COSTUME DESIGNER THE TIME OF THEIR LIVES Director: Roger Goldby. Producer: Sarah Sulick. Starring: Joan Collins and Pauline Collins. Bright Pictures. POLDARK (Series 2) Directors: Charles Palmer and Will Sinclair. Producer: Margaret Mitchell. Starring: Aiden Turner and Eleanor Tomlinson. Mammoth Screen. LA TRAVIATA AND THE WOMEN OF LONDON Director: Tim Kirby. Producer: Tim Kirby. Starring: Gabriela Istoc, Edgaras Montvidas and Stephen Gadd. Reef Television. GALAVANT Directors: Chris Koch, John Fortenberry and James Griffiths. Producers: Chris Koch and Helen Flint. Executive Producer: Dan Fogelman. Starring: Timothy Omundson, Joshua Sasse, Mallory Jansen, Karen David Hugh Bonneville, Ricky Gervais, Rutger Hauer and Vinnie Jones. ABC Studios. LORD LUCAN Director: Adrian Shergold. Producer: Chris Clough. Starring: Christopher Ecclestone, Michael Gambon, Anna Walton and Rory Kinnear. ITV. BURTON & TAYLOR Director: Richard Laxton. Producer: Lachlan MacKinnon. Starring: Helena Bonham-Carter and Dominic West. BBC. RTS CRAFT AND DESIGN AWARD 2013 – Best Costume Design. 4929 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 259 Los Angeles, CA 90010 ph 323.782.1854 fx 323.345.5690 [email protected] DOWNTON ABBEY (Series I, Series II, Christmas Special) Directors: Brian Percival, Brian Kelly and Ben Bolt. Series Producer: Liz Trubridge. Executive Producer: Gareth Neame. Starring Hugh Bonneville, Jim Carter, Brendan Coyle, Michelle Dockery, Joanne Froggatt, Phyllis Logan, Maggie Smith and Elizabeth McGovern. Carnival Film & Television. EMMY Nomination 2012 – Outstanding Costumes for a Series. BAFTA Nomination 2012 – Best Costume Design. COSTUME DESIGNERS GUILD (USA) AWARD 2012 – Outstanding Made for TV Movie or MiniSeries. EMMY AWARD 2011 – Outstanding Costume Design. (Series 1). Emmy Award 2011 – Outstanding Mini-Series. Golden Globe Award 2012 – Best Mini Series or Motion Picture made for TV.
    [Show full text]
  • IWU London Program
    IWU London Program Prof. Edgar Lehr Join us in London! Illinois Wesleyan University established its London 2018 London Director Program to provide students with a chance to study abroad in the first Illinois Wesleyan University is pleased semester of the sophomore or junior year while earning credit toward four to announce that Dr. Edgar Lehr, General Education requirements. The IWU London Program offers you a Professor of Biology, will direct the 2018 IWU London Program. close connection to an IWU faculty member, who acts as the program A specialist in the biodiversity of director, and to a cohort of IWU students while you pursue the General amphibians and reptiles in the Education goals of independence, critical thinking, imagination, social neotropics (Peru). Professor Lehr has awareness, and sensitivity to others. Specifically, a semester abroad will extensive experience living and working abroad and has taught in the US, prepare you for responsible citizenship and leadership in a global economy. Germany, Hong Kong, and Peru. In London, Prof. Lehr will offer London, the City “Understanding Evolution” (LSI, London is one of the world’s greatest Global Diversity). As he says, the course is “a perfect fit for London, where cities. With a history that spans Darwinian evolution had its origins.” centuries, London offers students the As part of the course, students will visit opportunity to visit Roman ruins, the Natural History Museum and medieval religious structures, a Museum of Science, the Darwin House reconstruction of Shakespeare’s Museum, the London Zoo, and Kew Globe Theatre, Winston Churchill’s Botanical Garden. In addition, Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • MDC 2018 Newsletter
    H A P P Y H O L I D A Y S F R O M M D C To our esteemed colleagues, partners, and friends: Happy Holidays from our family to yours! 2018 was a busy year as we strived to break new ground, establIisNh n TewH paIrStn eIrSshSipUs aEnd continue to create unique and exciting opportunities for businesses and individuals who want to make a positive difference. It's impossible to see the suffering of so many people and do nothing; which is why we created this platform to give them a voiSceT.U ADsI Oa mSoNtEheArK t oP aE EyoKuSng daughter, I know if I ever found myself in any of these heartbreaking circumstances I'd be praying someone out there would care enough to fight for me because I'd be too busy fighting to save my child. This is why I've built this company; to foster a sCtrEoLngEeBrR sIeTnYs e of community and provide trustworthy direction and resources for those who wRanEtS toP OheNlpD.E TRhSe re are many ways to give back...whether it's donating time, money or your voice in support of those in need. We lost many precious young friends this year and during those RtiEmSePs OI'mN DeEaRsiSly IoNv erwhelmed, but then someone steps in with a random act of kindness and I'mA CbTacIOk Nto feeling hopeful and optimistic. It's so important to bring moments of lightness in times of darkness or heaviness. While these happy times won't cure anyone physically, they can bring mental and emotional healing and serve as a much-needed reminder to others that theVy'IrDe EnOot CalAoMneP iAnI tGhNeiSr battles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Real "Monster" in Frankenstein
    ISSN 2380-5064 | Arsenal is published by the Augusta University Libraries | http://guides.augusta.edu/arsenal Volume 1, Issue 1 (2016) The Real "Monster" in Frankenstein David O. Urizar Citation Urizar, D. O. (2016). The Real "Monster" in Frankenstein. Arsenal: The undergraduate research journal of Augusta University, 1(1), 20-27. http://doi.org/10.21633/issn.2380.5064/f.2016.01.20 © 2016 Urizar. This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/) ISSN 2380-5064 10.21633/issn.2380.5064/f.2016.01.20 Real “Monster” in Frankenstein David O. Urizar Department of Biological Sciences College of Science and Mathematics Faculty Mentor: Todd Hoffman, Ph.D., Department of English and Foreign Languages The story of Frankenstein is typically seen as a battle between Victor Frankenstein and the “monster” of the story. However I argue that that the real “monster” of the story is in fact Victor Frankenstein who is suffering from paranoid schizophrenia and that the “monster” is really just a delusions that Victor uses to cope with the idea that he in fact is the killer of the story. This concept is evident in the fact that no one in the story has ever seen both Victor Frankenstein and the “monster” alive in the same place. The characteristics of the “monster’ also point towards the idea that the “monster” could not possibly exist. Even the way that Victor acts throughout the book point to the idea that he does not really care for the safety of his loved ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Young Frankenstein"
    "YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN" SCREENPLAY by GENE WILDER FIRST DRAFT FADE IN: EXT. FRANKENSTEIN CASTLE A BOLT OF LIGHTNING! A CRACK OF THUNDER! On a distant, rainy hill, the old Frankenstein castle, as we knew and loved it, is illuminated by ANOTHER BOLT OF LIGHTNING. MUSIC: AN EERIE TRANSYLVANIAN LULLABY begins to PLAY in the b.g. as we MOVE SLOWLY CLOSER to the castle. It is completely dark, except for one room -- a study in the corner of the castle -- which is only lit by candles. Now we are just outside a rain-splattered window of the study. We LOOK IN and SEE: INT. STUDY - NIGHT An open coffin rests on a table we can not see it's contents. As the CAMERA SLOWLY CIRCLES the coffin for a BETTER VIEW... A CLOCK BEGINS TO CHIME: "ONE," "TWO," "THREE," "FOUR..." We are ALMOST FACING the front of the coffin. "FIVE," "SIX," "SEVEN," "EIGHT..." The CAMERA STOPS. Now it MOVES UP AND ABOVE the satin-lined coffin. "NINE," "TEN," "ELEVEN," "T W E L V E!" CUT TO: THE EMBALMED HEAD OF BEAUFORT FRANKENSTEIN Half of still clings to the waxen balm; the other half has decayed to skull. Below his head is a skeleton, whose bony fingers cling to a metal box. A HAND reaches in to grasp the metal box. It lifts the box halfway out of the coffin -- the skeleton's fingers rising, involuntarily, with the box. Then, as of by force of will, the skeleton's fingers grab the box back and place it where it was. Now the "Hand" -- using its other hand -- grabs the box back from the skeleton's fingers.
    [Show full text]