DOCSLIB.ORG

Estadísticas De La Caficultura De Coto Brus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Estadísticas De La Caficultura De Coto Brus ESTADÍSTICAS DE LA CAFICULTURA DE COTO BRUS Unidad de Estudios Económicos y Mercado (UEEM) Enero de 2021 Letra Avenir Sector Productor (Caracterización) Coto Brus, Cosecha 2019-2020 Rangos de Entregas (fanegas) Número de Productores* Particip. en Producción 2 457 < 100 100 a 300 300 a 500 500 a 800 800 a 1000 > 1000 # Prod. 2,198 201 27 13 6 12 Partic. 31.0% 21.4% 6.5% 5.5% 3.4% 32.1% Fuente: Instituto del Café de Costa Rica (ICAFE). */ Agrupados por número de cédula con base en nóminas de Beneficios. Letra Avenir Sector Beneficiador (Caracterización) Coto Brus, Cosecha 2019-2020 Rangos de Recibo (fanegas) Número de Beneficios Particip. en Producción 27 6000 a 10000 a 30000 a < 1000 1000 a 3000 3000 a 6000 > 70000 10000 30000 70000 # Benef. 15 5 2 2 1 2 0 Partic. 2.9% 6.0% 6.0% 11.5% 15.2% 58.4% 0.0% Fuente: Instituto del Café de Costa Rica (ICAFE). Cosecha: periodo comprendido entre el 1 de abril y el 31 de marzo. Letra Avenir Producción de Café Fruta (fanegas) Coto Brus, Cosechas 15-16 a 20-21* 207,648 166,843 159,767 142,543 124,641 110,830 + 14.4% - 22.2% 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21* */ Estimación de cosecha, CICAFE (enero de 2021). Fuente: Instituto del Café de Costa Rica (ICAFE). Fanega: unidad de volumen correspondiente a 400 L. Letra Avenir Área y Productividad del Café Coto Brus, Años 2001 a 2017 28.6 27.6 Área (ha) Prod.(fan/ha) 17.7 17.6 16.1 10.8 13,122 11,647 Fanegas 9,655 10,207 10,261 Por Hectárea 2020-21 2001 2003 2012 2014 2017 Fuente: Instituto del Café de Costa Rica (ICAFE). Letra Avenir Afluencia Mensual de Café Fruta (%) Coto Brus, Cosechas 16-17 a 19-20 50% 2016-17 2017-18 40% 2018-19 2019-20 30% 20% 10% 0% Ago Set Oct Nov Dic Ene Feb Mar Abr Fuente: Instituto del Café de Costa Rica (ICAFE). Letra Avenir Producción Café por Distritos (fanegas) Coto Brus, Cosechas 2016-17 a 2019-20 110,000 96,250 2016-17 2017-18 82,500 2018-19 2019-20 68,750 10+ 55,000 98.7% 41,250 27,500 13,750 0 (CB) (CB) (CB) Pittier (BA) Potrero (CB) San (BA) Boruca (BA) (BA) Biolley (CB) (BA) Volcán Sabalito Gutiérrez Grande Vito Chánguena Aguabuena Braun Fuente: Instituto del Café de Costa Rica (ICAFE). Destino de la Producción de Café Fruta Coto Brus, 2018-19 y 2019-20 (pond.) Destino 98.5% 1.5% Se Benefició en otras Regiones 0.0% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Cafetaleras Coto Brus Los Santos Pérez Turrialba Valle Valle Zona Norte Zeledón Central Occidental Fuente:Fuente: Instituto Instituto del del Café Café de de Costa Costa Rica Rica (ICAFE). (ICAFE). Origen del Café Fruta Beneficiado Coto Brus, 2018-19 y 2019-20 (pond.) Origen 100.0% 0.0% Provino de otras Regiones 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Cafetaleras Coto Brus Los Santos Pérez Turrialba Valle Valle Zona Norte Zeledón Central Occidental Fuente:Fuente: Instituto Instituto del del Café Café de de Costa Costa Rica Rica (ICAFE). (ICAFE). Letra Avenir Café Fruta Maduro y No Maduro* Coto Brus, Cosechas 16-17 a 19-20 2.8% 2.7% 1.4% 2.7% 2.1% 98.6% 97.2% 97.3% 97.3% No Maduro Participación Maduro No Maduro Ponderada 18-19 y 19-20 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Fuente: Instituto del Café de Costa Rica (ICAFE). */ No maduro: verde y bellota. Letra Avenir Rendimiento Beneficiado (kg/fan) Coto Brus, Cosechas 16-17 a 19-20 40.7 41.4 41.1 41.6 41.4 Kilogramos Por Fanega (1819 y 1920) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Fuente: Instituto del Café de Costa Rica (ICAFE). */ Un kg equivale a 2.20462262 lb. Letra Avenir Ventas de Café Verde (Oro) por Tipos Coto Brus, Cosechas 18-19 y 19-20 Tipo de Café Abrev. Participación Strictly Hard Bean SHB 35.4% SHB Good Hard Bean GHB 0.1% 35.4% Pacific P 0.0% Hard Bean HB 1.0% Medium Hard Bean MHB 63.4% High Grown Atlantic HGA 0.0% MHB Medium Grown Atlantic MGA 0.1% 63.4% Low Grown Atlantic LGA 0.0% Fuente: Instituto del Café de Costa Rica (ICAFE). Letra Avenir Ventas por Calidad y Preparación Coto Brus, Cosechas 18-19 y 19-20 CALIDAD PREPARACIÓN PARTIC. Chorro Europeo 61.5% PP&CE Chorro Americano 11.7% PRIMER PERGAMINO Cataduras 1.6% 61.5% Recataduras 0.4% Chorro Europeo 2.5% Chorro Americano 1.6% SEGUNDO PERGAMINO Cataduras 7.7% Recataduras 2.3% TP&OI Chorro Americano 0.2% TERCER PERGAMINO Cataduras 8.2% 2.4% Otros Inferiores 2.4% Fuente: Instituto del Café de Costa Rica (ICAFE). Letra Avenir Comercialización de Café Verde (Oro) Coto Brus, 2016-17 a 2019-20 Exportación Consumo Nacional 77.8% 80.3% 79.4% 81.0% 22.2% 19.7% 20.6% 19.0% 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Fuente: Instituto del Café de Costa Rica (ICAFE). Letra Avenir Precios de Venta de Café (USD/46 kg) Coto Brus, Cosechas 16-17 a 19-20 Exportación * Consumo Nacional 185.03 181.39 185.54 128.13 169.51 115.06 122.29 122.70 56.91 54.45 59.10 62.84 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Fuente: Instituto del Café de Costa Rica (ICAFE). */ Corresponde al precio RIELES (Art.2, Reglamento 2762). Letra Avenir Precio FOB* Comparado con Nueva York (USD/46 kg) Coto Brus, Cosechas 2016-17 a 2019-20 Precio FOB Nueva York 190.68 186.99 191.20 174.92 154.99 128.43 114.33 117.42 35.70 46.49 72.66 73.78 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Fuente: Instituto del Café de Costa Rica (ICAFE). */ Precio FOBICAFE: Base Nueva York + Diferencial. Letra Avenir Productor entrega su café, la Firma Beneficiadora le entrega un recibo y le paga un adelanto. La Firma Beneficiadora informa quincenalmente Ajustes: la cantidad de café. • Calidades Inferiores. • Gastos Beneficiado. • Rendim.Beneficiado. Cálculo: [Ventas – Gastos B. – 9% Beneficiador – FONASCAFE] / Producción Pago: Las Firmas Beneficiadoras deben pagar el Precio de Liquidación. Los precios de venta de Los Beneficios realizan café son evaluados para liquidaciones trimestrales, que reflejen las según el avance de las condiciones del mercado. Proceso Liquidación Final Liquidación Proceso ventas de cada trimestre. Nueva York + Diferencial Letra Avenir Precio de Liquidación al Productor (CRC/fan) Coto Brus, Cosechas 2016-17 a 2019-20 Proceso de Cálculo 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Ingresos: Ingreso por Ventas de Café 84,585.5 81,146.7 89,830.3 90,145.2 Otros Ingresos 8.3 4.4 5.2 4.2 Ajuste Calidades Inferiores 0.7 216.6 1.8 4.3 Ingresos Totales 84,594.5 81,367.7 89,837.2 90,153.7 Menos Deducciones: Gastos de Beneficiado 10,369.1 11,376.7 12,587.7 11,675.2 Margen Bruto (9%) 6,680.3 6,299.2 6,952.5 7,063.1 Deducciones Totales 17,049.4 17,675.9 19,540.2 18,738.3 Más, Otros Ajustes: Dif.Rendimiento Benefic. 520.9 1,033.4 1,423.0 304.0 Valor Líquido Bellota 48.3 14.8 0.0 0.0 Total Otros Ajustes 569.2 1,048.3 1,423.0 304.0 Menos, FONECAFE: FONASCAFÉ 690.5 709.2 705.8 476.8 Precio Liquidación (CRC/fan) 67,423.7 64,030.9 71,014.3 71,242.6 Tipo-Cambio (CRC/USD) 554.07 565.52 594.77 573.84 Precio Liquidación (USD/fan) 121.69 113.22 119.40 124.15 Fuente: Instituto del Café de Costa Rica (ICAFE). Letra Avenir COMPARATIVO: Coto Brus vs Nacional Indicador Unidad Coto Brus Nacional Balance Café Maduro (fruta) Porc. 97.9% 97.8% 0.2% 18/19 Rendimiento Beneficiado kg/fan 41.4 44.6 -3.2 & Producción Café Verde (Oro) Grano Estrict. Duro (SHB) Porc. 35.4% 77.0% -41.6% 19/20 Prim.Perg.& Ch.Europeo Porc. 61.5% 61.8% -0.3% Ventas de Exportación Porc. 80.2% 83.8% -3.6% Precio de Exportación Base Nueva York Porc. 116.0 118.9 -2.9 MEJOR Diferencial Porc. 73.3 82.6 -9.4 Nacional Tipo de Cambio Exportación CRC/USD 583.6 581.3 2.3 6/8 Precio de Liquidación CRC/USD 71,135 84,293 -13,157 Fuente: Instituto del Café de Costa Rica (ICAFE). ESTADÍSTICAS DE LA CAFICULTURA DE COTO BRUS Unidad de Estudios Económicos y Mercado (UEEM) Enero de 2021.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Costa Rica's Policing of Sexuality and The
    COSTA RICA’S POLICING OF SEXUALITY AND THE NORMALIZATION OF THE BOURGEOIS FAMILY By GRISELDA E. RODRIGUEZ A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2010 1 ©2010 Griselda E. Rodriguez 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For being an incredible source of ideas and advice, and for eternally changing my theoretical approach to history I would like to thank Dr. Mark Thurner. I am grateful to Dr. Richmond Brown for continuously having an open door policy and being a genuine source of intellectual comfort. To them and to Dr. Carmen Diana Deere I am in debt for their sincere suggestions, guidance, and patience during the lengthy process of thesis writing and my overall intellectual development. I would like to thank my mother, for being my deepest confidante and most fervent supporter; my father for reminding me of the importance of laughter during my moments of frustration; and my brother for being a never-ending source of advice and positivity. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.................................................................................................................... 3 ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 1 NATION, GENDER, AND MYTH ............................................................................................. 7 Costa Rica’s Exceptionalist Myth .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plan De Desarrollo Rural Del Territorio Buenos Aires-Coto Brus 2015-2020
    PLAN DE DESARROLLO RURAL DEL TERRITORIO BUENOS AIRES-COTO BRUS 2015-2020 1 PRESENTACION Y AGRADECIMIENTO El 25 de setiembre de 2014, para el Territorio Buenos Aires-Coto Brus se registra como una fecha histórica por haberse logrado la conformación del primer Comité Directivo del Consejo Territorial de Desarrollo Rural (CTDR), elegido mediante Asamblea General, promovida por el Instituto de Desarrollo Rural (Inder). Al amparo de la Ley 9036 y del Reglamento de Constitución y Funcionamiento de los Consejos Territoriales y Regionales de Desarrollo Rural, la Oficina Territorial del Inder con sede en San Vito de Coto Brus, apoyada por la Dirección Regional, la Oficina de San Isidro y personal de Oficinas Centrales, inició el proceso de divulgación de la nueva Ley 9036, promoviendo visitas a las comunidades en cada uno de los distritos de los cantones de Buenos Aires y Coto Brus. Simultáneamente, en esta visitas y aprovechando la participación de los distintos actores del Territorio, se procedió con el abordaje enfocado a la motivación, sensibilización e inducción de los pobladores con relación al procedimiento metodológico para la constitución y funcionamiento del Consejo Territorial de Desarrollo Rural, como una instancia innovadora, capaz de impulsar la gestión y la negociación planificada, que le permita a las familias el acceso a bienes y servicios para mejorar las condiciones sociales y económicas y que les facilite el arraigo con mejor calidad de vida en el plano individual y colectivo. Esta nueva forma de construir de manera integral
    [Show full text]
  • Nature – Culture Interactions Among Peasant Communities Near La Amistad Trans-Boundary Park, Panama and Costa Rica
    Nature – Culture Interactions Among Peasant Communities Near La Amistad Trans-boundary Park, Panama and Costa Rica I. S. Candanedo Diaz A thesis submitted for the degree of PhD Department of Biological Sciences University of Essex September 2010 2 Dedicated to my Mother and Father who inspired me to love the countryside and its people and encouraged me to constantly look for new opportunities to learn. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to my supervisor, Jules Pretty, for giving me the freedom to build my own research project and for constantly encouraging me to explore challenging new grounds. I would also like to thank my two committee members, Dave Smith and Leanne Hepburn, for their support on statistical and practical issues regarding this research. I‟m also grateful to Rachel Hine who read various drafts of this thesis and provided useful comments. Many thanks for Sarah Pilgrim and Ambra Sedlmayr for their friendship, support and for always making my stay in England intellectually motivating and fun. My gratitude goes also to Stuart Bunting and Jo Peacock who in the first stages of this research were great listeners of my often extravagant ideas. I am especially grateful to members of the communities, conservation organization representatives and government officials in Panama and Costa Rica who received me and my family with a warm welcome and patiently answered all my questions. I do hope that some of the findings of this thesis are useful their efforts to built nature conservation that matters to people. I have been very fortunate to be accompanied in this journey for two extraordinary men: my husband Bill and my son Ian.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Costa Rica
    Rev. Biol. Trop., 9(1):23-3S, 1961 A preliminary check ·list of the Tabanidae (Diptera) of Costa Rica By G. B. Fairchild* (Received for publication January 11, 1961) Records of horseflies (Tabanidae) from Costa Rica are not numerous in the 'literature, and ,no list of the species reported seems to have been published. At the stiggestion of Dr. Rodrigo Zeledón, 1 have here brought together the available references in the literature together with records of specimens from Costa Rica in my notes and collection, with the hope that it may stimulate others to make collections of these insects and record their observations. The first notice of Tabanidae from Costa Rica app�ars to be in the Biolo­ gia Centrati Americana in 1886, where OSTEN SACKEN (51) records the presence of tw6 species and describes two others as new, all collected by Rogers. NearIy a generation later, Prof. JAMES S. HIN E of Ohio State University took up the study of Central American Tabanidae, and in a series of papers from 1906 to 1925, reported the presence of 17 species from Costa Rica, many collected by Pablo Schild at Higuito, San Mateo. Nine oí these were described as new species. Fo­ llowing HINE, Herr OTTO KROBER of Hamburg worked extensively on the Neo­ tropical Tabanidae, publishing nearly forty papers on them between 1925 and 1934. Scattered through his publications are references to about 21 species from Costa Rica, of which 12 species were described as new. Much' of his material was al so collected by Pablo Schild. FAlRCHILD (10-23), though dealing primarily with the Pan ama fauna, mentions Costa Rican specimens of 15 species, two of which were described as new.
    [Show full text]
  • (Tortricidae) of Costa Rica, with Summaries of Their Spatial and Temporal Distribution
    JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY Volume ,57 2003 Number 4 Journal of the Lepidopterists' SOciety 57(4) , 200:3,253- 269 AN ILLUSTRATED GUIDE TO THE ORTHOCOMOTIS DOGNIN (TORTRICIDAE) OF COSTA RICA, WITH SUMMARIES OF THEIR SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION JOHN W. BROWN Systematic Entomology LaboratOlY, Plant Sciences lnstitute, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, c/o N alional M uscum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20560-0168, USA. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Ten species of Orthocomotis Dognin are reported from Costa Rica: 0. ochmcea Clarke; 0.. herbacea Clarke (~o. subolivata Clarke. new synonymy); O. langicilia Brown, new species; o.. magicana (Zeller); o.. ettaldem (Druce); 0. herbaria (Busck) ( ~ o.. cristata Clarke, new synonymy; ~ o.. uragia Razowski & Becker, new synonymy); 0. phenax Razowski & Becker; O. similis Brown, new species; o.. nitida Clarke; and O. altivalans Brown, new species. o.rtttocomotis herbacea has been reared hom avocado (Persea americana) and 0. herbaria from Nectandra hihua, both in the Lauraceae, suggesting that this plant family may act as the larval host for other species of o.rthoco­ motis. A portion of a preserved pupal exuvium associated with the bolotype of 0. herhacea suggcsts that the pupae of o.rthocomotis are typical for Tortricidac, with the abdominal dorsal pits conspicuous in this stage. Adults and gcnitalia of all specics are illustrated, and elevational oc­ curre!1(;e is graphed. o.rthocouwtis herbaria and 0. nitirla are species of the lowlands (ca. 0-800 m); 0. altivalans is restricted to the highest el­ evations (ca. 2000-3000 m); the remainder of the species occupy the middle elevations (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Parque Internacional La Amistad Talamanca
    Plan de Manejo del Parque Internacional La Amistad Talamanca PLAN DE MANEJO Parque Internacional La Amistad Talamanca AREA DE CONSERVACION LA AMISTAD - PACIFICO SINAC - MINAE 1 Plan de Manejo del Parque Internacional La Amistad Talamanca 333.72 C8375p Costa Rica. Ministerio del Ambiente y Telecomunicaciones. Plan de manejo internacional La Amistad / MINAET, Sistema Nacional de Áreas de Conservación, ACLAP y Comisión Nacional del PILA. - - San José, Costa Rica : MINAET, SINAC, La Comisión, 2012 132 p. : il. ; 28 cm. ISBN 9789977-20-100-0 1. PLAN DE MANEJO. 2. PARQUE INTERNACIONAL LA AMISTAD. 3. SINAC. 4. MEDIO AMBIENTE. 5. CONSERVACION. 6. COSTA RICA. Acerca de esta publicación: Este estudio y su publicación han sido posibles gracias al apoyo del pueblo de los Estados Unidos de América a través de la Agencia de los Estados Unidos para el Desarrollo Internacional (USAID), conforme a las condiciones de la Donación No. EDG-A-00-01-00023-00 del Programa Parques en Peligro. El contenido de esta publicación es responsabilidad de The Nature Conservancy y no refleja necesariamente el punto de vista de USAID o del Gobierno de los Estados Unidos de América. La publicación de este documento se realizó gracias al apoyo económico del proyecto Removiendo Barreras para la Sostenibilidad del Sistema de Áreas Protegidas en Costa Rica, Proyecto 56040 GEF-PNUD-SINAC Autores: SINAC por medio de ACLA-P, ACLA-C y Comisión Nacional del PILA; Comunidades Indígenas del Atlántico y Pacifico, Comunidades Campesinas del Pacifico. Facilitadores: Carlos Borge; Alecksey Chuprine, Fernando Bermúdez y Comité Técnico de la Comisión Nacional del PILA. Editores: Luis Sánchez y Felipe Carazo Edición final para impresión: Gabriela Hernández Herrera Fotografías: Luis Sánchez, Roberto Ramos y SINAC Diagramación e impresión: Infoterra Editores S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Orchids and Orchidology in Central America
    LANKESTERIANA 9(1-2): 1-268. 2009. ORCHIDS AND ORCHIDOLOGY IN CENTRAL AMERICA. 500 YEARS OF HISTORY * CARLOS OSSENBACH Centro de Investigación en Orquídeas de los Andes “Ángel Andreetta”, Universidad Alfredo Pérez Guerrero, Ecuador Orquideario 25 de Mayo, San José, Costa Rica [email protected] INTRODUCTION “plant geography”, botanical exploration in our region seldom tried to relate plants with their life zones. The Geographical and historical scope of this study. XIX century and the first decades of the XX century The history of orchids started with the observation and are best defined by an almost frenetic interest in the study of species as isolated individuals, sometimes identification and description of new species, without grouped within political boundaries that are always bothering too much about their geographical origin. artificial. With rare exceptions, words such as No importance was given to the distribution of orchids “ecology” or “phytogeography” did not appear in the within the natural regions into which Central America botanical prose until the early XX century. is subdivided. Although Humboldt and Bonpland (1807), and Exceptions to this are found in the works by Bateman later Oersted, had already engaged in the study of (1837-43), Reichenbach (1866) and Schlechter (1918), * The idea for this book was proposed by Dr. Joseph Arditti during the 1st. International Conference on Neotropical Orchidology that was held in San José, Costa Rica, in May 2003. In its first chapters, this is without doubt a history of orchids, relating the role they played in the life of our ancient indigenous people and later in that of the Spanish conquerors, and the ornamental, medicinal and economical uses they gave to these plants.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    A MONOGRAPH OF THE GENUS LOCKHARTIA (ORCHIDACEAE: ONCIDIINAE) By MARIO ALBERTO BLANCO-COTO A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 © 2011 Mario Alberto Blanco-Coto 2 To my parents, who have always supported and encouraged me in every way. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many individuals and institutions made the completion of this dissertation possible. First, I thank my committee chair, Norris H. Williams, for his continuing support, encouragement and guidance during all stages of this project, and for providing me with the opportunity to visit and do research in Ecuador. W. Mark Whitten, one of my committee members, also provided much advice and support, both in the lab and in the field. Both of them are wonderful sources of wisdom on all matters of orchid research. I also want to thank the other members of my committee, Walter S. Judd, Douglas E. Soltis, and Thomas J. Sheehan for their many comments, suggestions, and discussions provided. Drs. Judd and Soltis also provided many ideas and training through courses I took with them. I am deeply thankful to my fellow lab members Kurt Neubig, Lorena Endara, and Iwan Molgo, for the many fascinating discussions, helpful suggestions, logistical support, and for providing a wonderful office environment. Kurt was of tremendous help in the lab and with Latin translations; he even let me appropriate and abuse his scanner. Robert L. Dressler encouraged me to attend the University of Florida, provided interesting discussions and insight throughout the project, and was key in suggesting the genus Lockhartia as a dissertation subject.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Death Register
    Costa Rica National Institute of Statistics and Censuses Department of Continuous Statistics Demographic Statistics Unit 2010 Death Register Study Documentation July 28, 2015 Metadata Production Metadata Producer(s) Olga Martha Araya Umaña (OMAU), INEC, Demographic Statistics Unit Coordinator Production Date July 28, 2012 Version Identification CRI-INEC-DEF 2010 Table of Contents Overview............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Scope & Coverage.............................................................................................................................................. 4 Producers & Sponsors.........................................................................................................................................5 Data Collection....................................................................................................................................................5 Data Processing & Appraisal..............................................................................................................................6 Accessibility........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Rights & Disclaimer........................................................................................................................................... 8 Files Description................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • This Work Is Licensed Under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License
    This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. RHYSODINI OF THE WORLD PART IV. REVISIONS OF RHYZODIASTES FAIRMAIRE AND CLINIDIUM KIRBY, WITH NEW SPECIES IN OTHER GENERA (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE OR RHYSODIDAE) Ross T. Bell Department of Zoology Marsh Life Science Building University of Vermont Burlington, VT, 05405-0086, U. S. A. Joyce R. Bell 24 East Terrace South Burlington, VT, 05401 U. S. A Quaestiones Entomologicae 21:1-172 1985 ABSTRACT This paper is fourth of a series which will constitute a revision of Rhysodini of the world. Rhyzodiastes Fairmaire and Clinidium Kirby are revised. New subgenera of Rhyzodiastes are: Rhyzotetrops NEW SUBGENUS, 0>/>e-Rhyzodiastes janus, n. sp„ one sp., Fiji; Rhyzoarca NEW SUBGENUS, rype-Rhyzodiastes montrouzieri (Chevrolat), three spp. Australia, New Zealand, New Caledonia; Temoana NEW SUBGENUS, fy/>e-Rhyzodiastes spissicornis (Fairmaire), 25 spp. Southeast Asia, Southwest Pacific; Rhyzostrix NEW SUBGENUS, ry/?e-Rhyzodiastes maderiensis (Chevrolat), five spp. S. America. Five species from South America remain in Rhyzodiastes s. str. The following new species are described (type localities indicated): Rhyzodiastes (Rhyzotetrops) janus (FIJI, Viti Levu); Rhyzodiastes (Temoana) bipunctatus (SOLOMON ISLANDS, Guadalcanal, Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Revision of the Western Hemisphere Checkered Beetle Genus Priocera KIRBY (Coleoptera, Cleridae, Clerinae)
    Linzer biol. Beitr. 52/2 1145-1255 Februar 2021 Taxonomic revision of the Western Hemisphere checkered beetle genus Priocera KIRBY (Coleoptera, Cleridae, Clerinae) Weston OPITZ A b s t r a c t : This study deals with the specious checkered beetle genus Priocera. Included are twenty-nine previously described species and 41 newly described species. The newly described species include: Priocera acrobela nov.sp., P. aperturosa nov.sp., P. ardis nov.sp., P. aspera nov.sp., P. batesi nov.sp., P. bibulla nov.sp., P. brunnea nov.sp., P. calvariola nov.sp., P. campbelli nov.sp., P. championi nov.sp., P. chilotaxis nov.sp., P. cocha nov.sp., P. colima nov.sp., P. conspicta nov.sp., P. crista nov.sp., P. denticarea nov.sp., P. ensis nov.sp., P. faro nov.sp., P. fissura nov.sp., P. flavofetosa nov.sp., P. gibberis nov.sp., P. hadrosa nov.sp., P. hovorei nov.sp., P. ipeti nov.sp., P. katarubella nov.sp., P. laticincta nov.sp., P. lustruata nov.sp., P. magdalena nov.sp., P. marajoara nov.sp., P. migma nov.sp., P. mixtura nov.sp., P. nubes nov.sp., P. odegaardi nov.sp., P. penna nov.sp., P. petalosa nov.sp., P. stockwelli nov.sp., P. strigilla nov.sp., P. trituberosa nov.sp., P. turnbowi nov.sp., P. uncinata nov.sp. and P. unimacula nov.sp. The previously described species are: P. angulata SCHENKLING, P. apicalis THOMSON, P. aurosignata LUCAS, P. bispinosa KLUG, P. castanea (NEWMAN), P. catalinae CAZIER, P. chiricahuae KNULL, P. cinctiventris (CHEVROLAT), P. clavipes GORHAM, P. costaricana WOLCOTT, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter Post Compendium Costa Rica
    Letter Post Compendium Costa Rica Currency : colon costarricense Basic services Mail classification system (Conv., art. 17.4; Regs., art. 17-101) 1 Based on speed of treatment of items (Regs., art. 17-101.2: Yes 1.1 Priority and non-priority items may weigh up to 5 kilogrammes. Whether admitted or not: No 2 Based on contents of items: No 2.1 Letters and small packets weighing up to 5 kilogrammes (Regs., art. 17-103.2.1). Whether admitted or not No (dispatch and receipt): 2.2 Printed papers weighing up to 5 kilogrammes (Regs., art. 17-103.2.2). Whether admitted or not for No dispatch (obligatory for receipt): 3 Classification of post items to the letters according to their size (Conv., art. 17,art. 17-102.2) Yes Optional supplementary services 4 Insured items (Conv., art. 18.2.1; Regs., 18-001.1) 4.1 Whether admitted or not (dispatch and receipt): No 4.2 Whether admitted or not (receipt only): No 4.3 Declaration of value. Maximum sum 4.3.1 surface routes: No limits 4.3.2 air routes: No limits 4.3.3 Labels. CN 06 label or two labels (CN 04 and pink "Valeur déclarée" (insured) label) used: - 4.4 Offices participating in the service: - 4.5 Services used: 4.5.1 air services (IATA airline code): CM Copa airlines / IB Iberia / AA American Airlines 4.5.2 sea services (names of shipping companies): N/A 4.6 Office of exchange to which a duplicate CN 24 formal report must be sent (Regs., art.17-138.11): Office Name : CTP / Centro Tratamiento Postal / Módulo Archivo Office Code : CTP / Mod Archivo Address : Zapote de la Iglesia católica 200 mts sur, Centro Tratamiento Postal - Mod de Documentación Phone : 22022900 Fax : E-mail 1 : [email protected] E-mail 2: [email protected] 5 Cash-on-delivery (COD) items (Conv., art.
    [Show full text]