Tempered Radicalism and the Politics of Ambivalence and Change Author(s): Debra E. Meyerson and Maureen A. Scully Source: Organization Science, Vol. 6, No. 5 (Sep. - Oct., 1995), pp. 585-600 Published by: INFORMS Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2634965 Accessed: 03-05-2018 19:02 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2634965?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms INFORMS is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Organization Science This content downloaded from 130.91.164.141 on Thu, 03 May 2018 19:02:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms When I read the first draft of this manuscript it provided a genuine "aha" experience. I felt that "tempered radicalism" was a concept that had been waiting to be invented. Meyerson and Scully, in my view, have grasped an important idea and have written about it in a careful and an illuminating way. It's one of those papers, I suspect, that some people will react to by thinking: "I wish I had written that!" Further, I can see others I know well in the field as fitting the description of the tempered radical, at least in some circumstances and at different times.