DOCSLIB.ORG

Primary Ring-Necked Pheasant Literature

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Primary Ring-Necked Pheasant Literature 1 Primary Ring-necked Pheasant Literature National Wild Pheasant Conservation Plan and Partnerships Last Updated: January 16, 2018 This document contains citations and abstracts of books, symposia, technical bulletins, national plans, and scientific articles concerning various aspects of pheasant ecology and management, primarily drawn from North American outlets. Citations are provided in descending chronological order for selected subject areas, with some being listed under multiple categories. Abstracts are those written by the author unless none was provided; papers without abstracts were subjectively summarized based on their contents, or the author’ own summary and/or conclusions were used if available. Given the large volume of historic pheasant literature available, this is a work in progress and there are no guarantees of its comprehensiveness at any point in time. A particular effort was made to include pheasant-specific literature published in the Journal of Wildlife Management and Wildlife Society Bulletin, but papers in which pheasants were but one of many species studied are often not included regardless of the outlet. Literature published prior to the beginning of the Journal of Wildlife Management in 1937 is also not well covered. The document will be periodically updated as additional citations become available. This work is for educational purposes only and may not be sold or otherwise reproduced without permission from the National Wild Pheasant Conservation Plan and Partnerships. ©2018 Pheasants Forever, Inc. and Midwest Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. All rights reserved. 2 Table of Contents Content Categories Page Monographs, symposia, and national plans …………..……………. 3 State and provincial technical bulletins …………………………………….. 3 Large-scale historical perspectives …………………………………….. 4 Ecology and demography • General ……………………………………………………………… 4 • Food habits ……………………………………………………………… 6 • Nesting ecology …………………………………………………. 7 • Brood-rearing ecology …………………………………………………. 9 • Male breeding ecology …………………………………………………. 10 • Wintering ecology …………………………………………………. 10 • Hunting effects …………………………………………………. 11 • Predation effects …………………………………………………. 12 • Weather and climate effects ….…………………………………. 13 • Agricultural effects o Land use …………………………………………………. 13 o Ecotoxicology …………………………………………………. 15 • Farm policy-related effects …………………………………….. 17 • Landscape effects …………………………………….. 19 • Roadside management effects …………………………………….. 20 • Energy development effects …………………………………….. 20 Physiology ……………………………………………………………… 20 Genetics ……………………………………………………………… 23 Diseases and parasites …………………………………………………. 24 Impacts on other species …………………………………………………. 24 Techniques • Field research …………………………………………………. 25 • Population monitoring …………………………………………………. 27 Pen-raised pheasants …………………………………………………. 28 Translocation of wild pheasants …………………………………….. 30 Human dimensions …………………………………………………………….… 31 Abstracts in Alphabetical Order ……………………………………… 32 3 Citations by Content Category Monographs, symposia, and national plans Midwest Pheasant Study Group. 2013. National wild pheasant conservation plan. N.B. Veverka (ed.). Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 111 pp. Hallett, D. L., W. R. Edwards, and G. V. Burger (eds.). 1988. Pheasants: symptoms of wildlife problems on agricultural lands. North Central Section of the Wildlife Society, Bloomington, Indiana, 345 pp. Hill, D. and P. Robertson. 1988b. The pheasant: ecology, management and conservation. BSP Professional Books, Oxford, England. Allen, D. L. (ed.). 1956. Pheasants in North America. Stackpole Company, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, D.C. McAtee, W. L. (ed.). 1945. The ring-necked pheasant and its management in North America. American Wildlife Institute, Washington, D.C. State and provincial technical bulletins Trautman, C. G. 1982. History, ecology and management of the ring-necked pheasant in South Dakota. South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks Wildlife Research Bulletin 7. Warner, R. E. 1981. Illinois pheasants: population, ecology, distribution, and abundance, 1900-1978. Illinois Natural History Survey Biological Notes 115, Champaign. 22 pp. Farris, A. L., E. D. Klongdan, and R. C. Nomsen. 1977. The ring-necked pheasant in Iowa. Iowa Conservation Commission, Des Moines, Iowa. 147pp. Weigand, J. P., and R. G. Janson. 1976. Montana’s ring-necked pheasant – history, ecology, and management. Montana Department of Fish and Game. 178 pp. Gates, J. M., and J. B. Hale. 1975. Reproduction of an east central Wisconsin pheasant population. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin 85, Madison. 70pp. Gates, J. M., and J. B. Hale. 1974. Seasonal movement, winter habitat use, and population distribution of an east central Wisconsin pheasant population. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin 76, Madison. 55pp. Baxter, W. L., and C. W. Wolfe. 1973. Life history and ecology of the ring-necked pheasant in Nebraska. Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Technical Publication. 58pp. Dumke, R. T., and C. M. Pils. 1973. Mortality of radio-tagged pheasants on the Waterloo Wildlife Area. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin 72, Madison. 52pp. 4 Wagner, F. H., C. D. Besadny, and C. Kabat. 1965. Population ecology and management of Wisconsin pheasants. Wisconsin Conservation Department Technical Bulletin 34, Madison. Stokes, A. W. 1954. Population studies of the ring-necked pheasants on Pelee Island, Ontario. Ontario Department of Lands and Forests Technical Bulletin, Wildlife Series 4. 154pp. Large-scale historical perspectives Hiller, T. L., L. A. Powell, T. D. McCoy, and J. J. Lusk. 2009. Long-term agricultural land-use trends in Nebraska, 1866-2007. Great Plains Research 19:225-237. Riley, T. Z., and S. P. Riley. 1999. Temporal comparison of pheasant brood sizes in the Midwest. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27:366-373. Berner, A. H. 1988. Federal pheasants – impact of federal agricultural programs on pheasant habitat, 1934-1985. Pages 45-93 in D. L. Hallett, W. R. Edwards, and G. V. Burger (eds.), Pheasants: symptoms of wildlife problems on agricultural lands. North Central Section of the Wildlife Society, Bloomington, IN, 345 pp. Burger, G. V. 1988. 100 years of ringnecks: an historical perspective on pheasants in North America. Pages 1-26 in D. L. Hallett, W. R. Edwards, and G. V. Burger (eds.), Pheasants: symptoms of wildlife problems on agricultural lands. North Central Section of the Wildlife Society, Bloomington, IN, 345 pp. Dahlgren, R. B. 1988. Distribution and abundance of the ring-necked pheasant in North America. Pages 29-43 in D. L. Hallett, W. R. Edwards, and G. V. Burger (eds.), Pheasants: symptoms of wildlife problems on agricultural lands. North Central Section of the Wildlife Society, Bloomington, IN, 345 pp. Etter, S. L., R. E. Warner, G. B. Joselyn, and J. E. Warnock. 1988. The dynamics of pheasant abundance during the transition of intensive row-cropping in Illinois. Pages 111-127 in D. L. Hallett, W. R. Edwards, and G. V. Burger (eds.), Pheasants: symptoms of wildlife problems on agricultural lands. North Central Section of the Wildlife Society, Bloomington, IN, 345 pp. Jarvis, R. L., and S. G. Simpson. 1978. Habitat, survival, productivity, and abundance of pheasants in western Oregon, 1947-1975. Journal of Wildlife Management 42:866-874. Labisky, R. F. 1976. Midwest pheasant abundance declines. Wildlife Society Bulletin 4:182-183. Allen, D. 1950. Problems and needs in pheasant research. Journal of Wildlife Management 14:105-114. Prill, A. G. 1893. Ring pheasant. Science 22:186. Ecology and demography: General Guthery, F. S., and J. H. Shaw. 2013. Density dependence: applications in wildlife management. Journal of Wildlife Management 77:33-38. 5 Clark, W. R., T. R. Bogenschutz, and D. H. Tessin. 2008. Sensitivity analyses of a population projection model of ring-necked pheasants. Journal of Wildlife Management 72:1605-1613. Williams, C.K., A. R. Ives, and R. D. Applegate. 2003. Population dynamics across geographical ranges: time-series analyses of three small game species. Ecology 84:2654-2667. Smith, S. A., N. J. Stewart, and E. J. Gates. 1999. Home ranges, habitat selection and mortality of ring- necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) in north-central Maryland. American Midland Naturalist 141:185-197. Edwards, W. R. 1988. Realities of "population regulation" and harvest management. Pages 307-335 in D. L. Hallett, W. R. Edwards, and G. V. Burger (eds.), Pheasants: symptoms of wildlife problems on agricultural lands. North Central Section of the Wildlife Society, Bloomington, IN, 345 pp. Hill, D. A., and P. A. Robertson. 1988a. A population model as an aid to pheasant management. Pages 149-163 in D. L. Hallett, W. R. Edwards, and G. V. Burger (eds.), Pheasants: symptoms of wildlife problems on agricultural lands. North Central Section of the Wildlife Society, Bloomington, IN, 345 pp. Warner, R. E. 1988. Habitat management: how well do we recognize the pheasant facts of life? Pages 129-146 in D. L. Hallett, W. R. Edwards, and G. V. Burger (eds.), Pheasants: symptoms of wildlife problems on agricultural lands. North Central Section of the Wildlife Society, Bloomington, IN, 345 pp. Snyder, W. D. 1985. Survival of radio-marked hen ring-necked pheasants in Colorado. Journal of Wildlife Management 49:1044-1050. Guthery, F. S., and R. W. Whiteside. 1984. Playas important to pheasants on the Texas High Plains. Wildlife Society Bulletin 12:40-43.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wild Turkey Education Guide
    Table of Contents Section 1: Eastern Wild Turkey Ecology 1. Eastern Wild Turkey Quick Facts………………………………………………...pg 2 2. Eastern Wild Turkey Fact Sheet………………………………………………….pg 4 3. Wild Turkey Lifecycle……………………………………………………………..pg 8 4. Eastern Wild Turkey Adaptations ………………………………………………pg 9 Section 2: Eastern Wild Turkey Management 1. Wild Turkey Management Timeline…………………….……………………….pg 18 2. History of Wild Turkey Management …………………...…..…………………..pg 19 3. Modern Wild Turkey Management in Maryland………...……………………..pg 22 4. Managing Wild Turkeys Today ……………………………………………….....pg 25 Section 3: Activity Lesson Plans 1. Activity: Growing Up WILD: Tasty Turkeys (Grades K-2)……………..….…..pg 33 2. Activity: Calling All Turkeys (Grades K-5)………………………………..…….pg 37 3. Activity: Fit for a Turkey (Grades 3-5)…………………………………………...pg 40 4. Activity: Project WILD adaptation: Too Many Turkeys (Grades K-5)…..…….pg 43 5. Activity: Project WILD: Quick, Frozen Critters (Grades 5-8).……………….…pg 47 6. Activity: Project WILD: Turkey Trouble (Grades 9-12………………….……....pg 51 7. Activity: Project WILD: Let’s Talk Turkey (Grades 9-12)..……………..………pg 58 Section 4: Additional Activities: 1. Wild Turkey Ecology Word Find………………………………………….…….pg 66 2. Wild Turkey Management Word Find………………………………………….pg 68 3. Turkey Coloring Sheet ..………………………………………………………….pg 70 4. Turkey Coloring Sheet ..………………………………………………………….pg 71 5. Turkey Color-by-Letter……………………………………..…………………….pg 72 6. Five Little Turkeys Song Sheet……. ………………………………………….…pg 73 7. Thankful Turkey…………………..…………………………………………….....pg 74 8. Graph-a-Turkey………………………………….…………………………….…..pg 75 9. Turkey Trouble Maze…………………………………………………………..….pg 76 10. What Animals Made These Tracks………………………………………….……pg 78 11. Drinking Straw Turkey Call Craft……………………………………….….……pg 80 Section 5: Wild Turkey PowerPoint Slide Notes The facilities and services of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources are available to all without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, national origin or physical or mental disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological and Endocrine Correlates of Dominance in Male
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Kathy A. Lumas for the degree of Master of Science in Zoology presented on 1 October 1982 Title: Morphological and Endocrine Correlates of Dominance in Male Ring-necked Pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy Dr. Frank L. Moore An investigation of the correlation between a number of behavioral, morphological and physiological parameters and dominance status of male Ring-necked Pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) was undertaken. Dominant males performed significantly more aggressive behaviors than subordinates and a higher proportion of these behaviors was directed toward distantly ranked subordinates. Animals could also be ranked in a subordinance hierarchy with subordinate males performing submissive behaviors and vocalizations at highest frequencies and directing the largest proportion of these behaviors toward distantly ranked dominants. A number of morphological characters were measured and their correlations with dominance status were investigated. Several significant correlations between certain body and wattle measurements were found. Experimental manipulations of the wattles were conducted to attempt to change behaviors and dominance status. Wattles of dominant birds were painted black to make them look subordinate. Wattles of subordinate birds were painted red to make them look dominant. Two of the dominant birds received more aggressive behaviors from true subordinates, after their wattles were painted. Two of the subordinate birds received fewer aggressive behaviors from true dominants, after their wattles were painted. Plasma levels of testicular hormones were measured during hierarchy establishment and in stable hierarchies. No correlations were found between testosterone levels and dominance status or frequencies of any of the agonistic behaviors measured. Exogenous hormones (estradiol, dihydrotestosterone, corticosterone, ACTH4_10 and a-MSH) were injected to attempt to alter behaviors and change dominance status.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Sight Barriers in Pens of Breeding Ring-Necked Pheasants (Phasianus Colchicus): I
    Effect of sight barriers in pens of breeding ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus): I. Behaviour and welfare Charles Deeming, Jonathan Cooper, Holly Hodges To cite this version: Charles Deeming, Jonathan Cooper, Holly Hodges. Effect of sight barriers in pens of breeding ring- necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus): I. Behaviour and welfare. British Poultry Science, Taylor & Francis, 2011, 52 (04), pp.403-414. 10.1080/00071668.2011.590796. hal-00732523 HAL Id: hal-00732523 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00732523 Submitted on 15 Sep 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. British Poultry Science For Peer Review Only Effect of sight barriers in pens of breeding ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus): I. Behaviour and welfare Journal: British Poultry Science Manuscript ID: CBPS-2010-256.R1 Manuscript Type: Original Manuscript Date Submitted by the 02-Dec-2010 Author: Complete List of Authors: Deeming, Charles; University of Lincoln, Biological Sciences cooper, jonathan; University of Lincoln, Biological Sciences Hodges, Holly; University of Lincoln, Biological Sciences Keywords: Pheasant, Sight barriers, Behaviour, Welfare E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/cbps Page 1 of 36 British Poultry Science Edited Hocking 1 1 29/04/2011 2 3 Effect of sight barriers in pens of breeding ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus 4 5 colchicus ): I.
    [Show full text]
  • Compendium of Avian Ecology
    Compendium of Avian Ecology ZOL 360 Brian M. Napoletano All images taken from the USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/id/framlst/infocenter.html Taxonomic information based on the A.O.U. Check List of North American Birds, 7th Edition, 1998. Ecological Information obtained from multiple sources, including The Sibley Guide to Birds, Stokes Field Guide to Birds. Nest and other images scanned from the ZOL 360 Coursepack. Neither the images nor the information herein be copied or reproduced for commercial purposes without the prior consent of the original copyright holders. Full Species Names Common Loon Wood Duck Gaviiformes Anseriformes Gaviidae Anatidae Gavia immer Anatinae Anatini Horned Grebe Aix sponsa Podicipediformes Mallard Podicipedidae Anseriformes Podiceps auritus Anatidae Double-crested Cormorant Anatinae Pelecaniformes Anatini Phalacrocoracidae Anas platyrhynchos Phalacrocorax auritus Blue-Winged Teal Anseriformes Tundra Swan Anatidae Anseriformes Anatinae Anserinae Anatini Cygnini Anas discors Cygnus columbianus Canvasback Anseriformes Snow Goose Anatidae Anseriformes Anatinae Anserinae Aythyini Anserini Aythya valisineria Chen caerulescens Common Goldeneye Canada Goose Anseriformes Anseriformes Anatidae Anserinae Anatinae Anserini Aythyini Branta canadensis Bucephala clangula Red-Breasted Merganser Caspian Tern Anseriformes Charadriiformes Anatidae Scolopaci Anatinae Laridae Aythyini Sterninae Mergus serrator Sterna caspia Hooded Merganser Anseriformes Black Tern Anatidae Charadriiformes Anatinae
    [Show full text]
  • A Multigene Phylogeny of Galliformes Supports a Single Origin of Erectile Ability in Non-Feathered Facial Traits
    J. Avian Biol. 39: 438Á445, 2008 doi: 10.1111/j.2008.0908-8857.04270.x # 2008 The Authors. J. Compilation # 2008 J. Avian Biol. Received 14 May 2007, accepted 5 November 2007 A multigene phylogeny of Galliformes supports a single origin of erectile ability in non-feathered facial traits Rebecca T. Kimball and Edward L. Braun R. T. Kimball (correspondence) and E. L. Braun, Dept. of Zoology, Univ. of Florida, P.O. Box 118525, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA. E-mail: [email protected] Many species in the avian order Galliformes have bare (or ‘‘fleshy’’) regions on their head, ranging from simple featherless regions to specialized structures such as combs or wattles. Sexual selection for these traits has been demonstrated in several species within the largest galliform family, the Phasianidae, though it has also been suggested that such traits are important in heat loss. These fleshy traits exhibit substantial variation in shape, color, location and use in displays, raising the question of whether these traits are homologous. To examine the evolution of fleshy traits, we estimated the phylogeny of galliforms using sequences from four nuclear loci and two mitochondrial regions. The resulting phylogeny suggests multiple gains and/or losses of fleshy traits. However, it also indicated that the ability to erect rapidly the fleshy traits is restricted to a single, well-supported lineage that includes species such as the wild turkey Meleagris gallopavo and ring-necked pheasant Phasianus colchicus. The most parsimonious interpretation of this result is a single evolution of the physiological mechanisms that underlie trait erection despite the variation in color, location, and structure of fleshy traits that suggest other aspects of the traits may not be homologous.
    [Show full text]
  • I Understanding the Implications of Climate Change for Birds of The
    Understanding the implications of climate change for birds of the family Phasianidae: incorporating fleshy structures into models of heat dissipation capacity by Megan Lindsay Smith A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Mississippi in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College. Oxford May 2015 Approved by Advisor: Dr. Richard Buchholz Reader: Dr. Louis Zachos Reader: Dr. Debra Young i ©2015 Megan Lindsay Smith ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Richard Buchholz, for advising me throughout the tenure of this project and for allowing me access to the wealth of data he had collected prior to the start of this project. I would also like to thank Dr. Louis Zachos and Dr. Debra Young for the time and consideration they put forth as the second and third readers of this thesis. I would like to thank the Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College for giving me the opportunity to participate in this program. I would like to thank Brackin Garlough and SeCory Cox for their help in measuring the fleshy structures. I am very grateful to my roommate and best friend, Rachel Banka, who has listened to me talk about this project whether I was excited, frustrated, or confused over the past two years. I would like to thank all members of the Noonan lab for the advice and encouragement they offered to me as I completed this project, with a special thanks to Andrew Snyder for providing images. Last but not least, I would like to thank my family, especially my parents, Tracy and Karen Smith, without whom I never would have made it to this point.
    [Show full text]
  • WATTLE SIZE IS CORRELATED with MALE TERRITORIAL RANK in JUVENILE RING- NECKED PHEASANTS Anna Papeschi Universita Di Firenze, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Natural Resources Natural Resources, School of 2003 WATTLE SIZE IS CORRELATED WITH MALE TERRITORIAL RANK IN JUVENILE RING- NECKED PHEASANTS Anna Papeschi Universita di Firenze, [email protected] John P. Carroll University of Georgia, [email protected] Francesco Dessi-Fulgheri Universita di Firenze Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natrespapers Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Other Environmental Sciences Commons Papeschi, Anna; Carroll, John P.; and Dessi-Fulgheri, Francesco, "WATTLE IS ZE IS CORRELATED WITH MALE TERRITORIAL RANK IN JUVENILE RING-NECKED PHEASANTS" (2003). Papers in Natural Resources. 657. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natrespapers/657 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resources, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Natural Resources by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 362 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS The Condor 105:362±366 q The Cooper Ornithological Society 2003 WATTLE SIZE IS CORRELATED WITH MALE TERRITORIAL RANK IN JUVENILE RING-NECKED PHEASANTS ANNA PAPESCHI1,4,JOHN P. C ARROLL2,5 AND FRANCESCO DESSIÁ-FULGHERI1,3,4 1Dipartimento di Biologia Animale e Genetica, UniversitaÁ di Firenze, Via Romana 17, 50125 Firenze, Italy 2The Game Conservancy Trust, Fordingbridge, Hampshire SP6 1EF, UK 3Centro di Studio per la Faunistica ed Ecologia Tropicali, C.N.R., Firenze, Italy Abstract. We used morphological measurements chos al inicio de la eÂpoca reproductiva, esto sugiere and behavioral observations to investigate the relation- que el tamanÄo de la caruÂncula podrõÂa ser usado como ship between male ornaments and male social rank una senÄal de niveles de agresioÂn y condicioÂn corporal during the breeding season in a free-ranging popula- entre los machos.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Research Online Oro.Open.Ac.Uk
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs Social Organisation in the Malaysian Peacock Pheasant Thesis How to cite: McGowan, Philip James Kevin (1992). Social Organisation in the Malaysian Peacock Pheasant. PhD thesis. The Open University. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 1992 Philip James Kevin McGowan Version: Version of Record Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk Social organisation in the Malaysian peacock pheasant Philip James Kevin McGowan B.Sc. (Hons.) Biology of Plants and Animals, University of Newcastle upon Tyne h> Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Biology Department, The Open University, Milton Keynes, (U.K. February, 1992 ProQuest Number: 27701237 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 27701237 Published by ProQuest LLO (2019). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLO. ProQuest LLO. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.Q. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT This thesis reports a study of the behaviour and morphology of the Malaysian peacock pheasant Polyplectron makicense, an inhabitant of lowland rain forest in Peninsular Malaysia- A total of 21 months was spent in the field and museum collections were visited.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkeys at Plymouth Fare and Fowl by Elizabeth Gawthrop Riely
    edible TRADITIONS TURKEYS AT PLYMOUTH FARE AND FOWL by Elizabeth Gawthrop Riely hen the Mayflower landed at Plymouth in December one and only firsthand account of that harvest feast, thanksgiv- 1620, abundant game on the new continent — ing spelled in lower case, is a letter written by Edward Winslow Wfurred, feathered and finny — greeted the arrivals. in 1621 where he mentions “fowl.” To his friend in England he Among the birds were an estimated 10 million wild turkeys, a wrote from Plymouth, “our harvest being gotten in, our gover- number impossible for us to establish and even harder to imagine. nor sent four men on fowling, so that so we might after a special One early Plymouth colonist, astonished by the large flocks of manner rejoice together after we had gathered the fruit of our wild turkeys passing by his doorway, asked an Indian how many labors. They four in one day killed as much fowl as, with a little were to be found in the forest on a given day. “Neent Matawna” help beside, served the company almost a week.” The passage was the reply in his Wampanoag language, “a thousand a day.” continues, naming deer and Indians — but no cranberries, no Whether or not that figure was metaphorical, “the plenty of them pumpkin pie and no turkeys by name. Those “fowl” were prob- is such in those parts,” the chronicler wrote. ably wild ducks and geese as well as turkeys, all of them plentiful, Today more and more Americans know that the First Thanksgiv- but we cannot know specifically.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Turkey Class: Aves Order: Galliformes Family: Meleagridinae Other Names: Turkey, Large Poultry Bird
    Meleagris gallopavo Domestic Turkey Class: Aves Order: Galliformes Family: Meleagridinae Other names: Turkey, Large poultry bird Physical Description: The modern domesticated turkey descends from the wild turkey. It was domesticated by the indigenous peoples of Mesoamerica at least 2,000 years ago, with the evidence pointing to what are today the central regions of Mexico. Domestic turkeys come in a variety of size and color. The most popular type of domestic turkey is the Broad Breasted White which is pure white in color, with red skin on its head. A red gobbler is for courtship purposes. These birds are grown in large, fully automated grow-out barns, which may house as many as 10,000 birds. The growing process for these birds has been so well refined; the birds often grow to larger than 50 lbs. Average birds are typically 38-40 lbs. Domestic turkeys weigh twice what a wild turkey does. Due to their large size and rapid growth, they are prone to health problems associated with being overweight, such as heart disease, respiratory failure and joint damage. Even if a turkey is spared from slaughter, they usually have short lives. Diet in the Wild: Domestic turkeys eat pellets/grain and fruits and vegetables. Wild turkeys typically forage on forest floors, but can also be found in grasslands and swamps or even up in trees. They feed on nuts (especially acorns), seeds, fruits, insects, small reptiles and salamanders. Diet at the Zoo: Turkey grain, mealworms. Habitat & Range: These turkeys are domesticated; therefore they are kept as pets, found on farms, and poultry farms.
    [Show full text]
  • Slaughter Inspection Training Page6- 1 Poultry Anatomy 04-18-2017
    Poultry Anatomy 04-18-2017 Poultry Anatomy Objectives After a student completed this module, he or she will be able to accomplish the following 1. On a real specimen or drawing of a young chicken, identify and locate the following anatomical structures: (a) External Anatomy: (1) Uropygial gland/ oil gland/ oil sack/ preen gland (2) Feather follicle (3) Different feather tracts (4) Comb (5) Wattles (6) Shank (7) Hock joint (8) Vent opening (b) Internal Anatomy: (1) Esophagus/ gullet/ goozle (2) Crop/ ingluvies/ craw (3) Proventriculus/ true stomach/ glandular stomach (4) Ventriculus/ gizzard/ muscular stomach (5) Small intestine (6) Duodenum (7) Pancreas (located in the loop of the duodenum) (8) Large intestine/ rectum/ colon (9) Cecum (a pair of ceca present) (10) Cloaca/ Vent (anus) (11) Mesentery vessels (12) Heart (13) Coronary band Poultry Slaughter Inspection Training Page6- 1 Poultry Anatomy 04-18-2017 (14) Pericardial sac (15) Spleen (16) Liver (17) Gall bladder (18) Kidneys (19) Thymus (20) Bursa of fabricius (21) Trachea/ windpipe (22) Lungs (23) Syrinx (24) Air sacs: (a) Interclavicular (b) Thoracic (c) Abdominal (25) Reproductive system: (a) Ovary/oviduct (b) Testicles (c) Skeletal anatomy: (1) Vertebral column consists of: (a) Cervical vertebrae (b) Thoracic vertebrae (c) Lumbar vertebrae (d) Sacral vertebrae (e) Coccygeal vertebrae (2) Pectoral girdle consists of: (a) Clavicle/ wishbone/ pulleybone/ furculum (b) Coracoid (c) Scapula/ shoulder blade (3) Wing consists of: (a) Humerus (b) Radius Poultry Slaughter Inspection Training Page6- 2 Poultry Anatomy 04-18-2017 (c) Ulna (d) Wing tip (4) Pelvic girdle consists of: (a) Ilium (b) Ischium (c) Pubis (d) synsacrum (5) Legs consist of: (a) Femur (b) Tibia (c) Fibula (d) shank (6) Other skeletal bones: (a) Sternum/ keel/ breast bone (b) Vertebral ribs (c) Sternal ribs 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine
    An-Najah National University The Faculty of Agriculture and Vet. Medicine Poultry Management First Hour Exam A. Multiple choice:(12 points) (ILOs ) 1. Circle the best single response for each of the following: (12 points) a. Birds are: a. vertebrates b. mammals c. reptiles b. The skin and feathers collectively form: a. the integument b. the skin c. the glands c. Commercial strain of broiler chickens: a. ross b. red plymouth rock c. cornish d. Commercial strain of laying chickens: a. hy-line b. leghorn c. hubbard e. Anatomy means: a. study of structure and form of animals b. study of functions of animal structures f. Broilers are mostly: a. more are white b. more are colored g. Ovulation refers to stigma rupture whereas ovi-position refers to: a. yolk fall into the infundibulum b. egg laying h. If the female chicken is mated, the ovum will be fertilized within the: a. the ovary b. the magnum c. the infundibulum i. One of the following is not a domesticated poultry; a. chickens b. goose c. turkey d. eagles j. The medullary bone grows under the influence of: a. progesterone b. estrogens k. One of the following is poorly developed in chickens: a. sense of vision b. sense of smell c. sense of taste l. The _____ is a large dilation in the esophagus: a. proventriculus b. crop m. Mediterranean breed of chicken: a. single comb white leghorn b. single comb shaver B. Short Answers 1. Briefly, "explain the role of HCl in digestion of food in chickens. (4 points) 2.
    [Show full text]