DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) 1.1.1.1 LP/Ev/9f Bracknell Forest Borough Council Level 2 SFRA Final Report September 2019 Bracknell Forest Council Time Square Market Street BRACKNELL Berkshire RG12 1JD JBA Project Manager Anna Beasley 8a Castle Street WALLINGFORD Oxfordshire OX10 8DL Revision History Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to Draft v1.0 / 11 Jan 2018 Marie O'Sullivan, Julia Greene Draft Final v2.0 / 13 June Comments from Bracknell Marie O'Sullivan, Julia 2018 Forest Council Greene Final v3.0 / 11 January 2019 Comments from Bracknell Natalie Hird, Julia Greene Forest Council and inclusion of additional sites Final v4.0 / 16 July 2019 Comments from Bracknell Natalie Hird, Julia Greene Forest Council, inclusion and removal of sites. Final v5.0 / 05 September Comments from Bracknell Natalie Hird, Julia Greene 2019 Forest Council Contract This report describes work commissioned by Bracknell Forest Council by an email dated 3 October 2017. Bracknell Forest Council's Representative for the contract was Marie O'Sullivan. Anna Beasley, Paul Eccleston, Anna Hastings and Cheryl Briars of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by .................................................. Cheryl Briars BSc MSc Assistant Analyst ....................................................................... Anna Beasley BSc MSc CEnv MCIWEM C.WEM Technical Director Reviewed by ................................................. Paul Eccleston BA CertWEM CEnv MCIWEM C.WEM Technical Director Purpose This document has been prepared as a Final Report for Bracknell Forest Council. JBA Consulting accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by the Client for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. JBA Consulting has no liability regarding the use of this report except to Bracknell Forest Council. 2016s5363 - Bracknell Forest Council - SFRA L2 Final Report v5.0 (Sep 2019) i Acknowledgements With thanks to Marie O'Sullivan and Julia Greene (Bracknell Forest Council), Clark Gordon (Environment Agency), and Thames Water. Copyright © Jeremy Benn Associates Limited 2019 Carbon Footprint A printed copy of the main text in this document will result in a carbon footprint of 82g if 100% post- consumer recycled paper is used and 105g if primary-source paper is used. These figures assume the report is printed in black and white on A4 paper and in duplex. JBA is aiming to reduce its per capita carbon emissions. 2016s5363 - Bracknell Forest Council - SFRA L2 Final Report v5.0 (Sep 2019) ii Executive Summary Bracknell Forest Council is undertaking the preparation of a new Bracknell Forest Local Plan (BFLP). As part of this process it is preparing an evidence base which will support the policies and allocations included in the document. This Level 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) is one piece of the evidence base, which will help to inform policy development and the selection of site allocations for inclusion within the BFLP. On the basis of the Level 1 SFRA and the Sustainability Appraisal (SA), the Council identified that all the necessary development required over the plan period cannot be accommodated by sites identified as being at low flood risk from all sources (noting that the SA process discounted some low risk sites on other planning grounds), and additional sites would be required to enable delivery of the level of development set out in the BFLP. The Council therefore progressed to a Level 2 SFRA for 28 sites and 3 Clusters to provide further detail and development solutions for prescribed sites and for the application of the Sequential and Exception Test (if required). The Level 2 SFRA draws upon all the information and data sources that were compiled as part of the Level 1 assessment, examining them in more detail on a site-by-site basis for the 20 sites and 4 Clusters. It also examines detailed hydraulic modelling outputs, such as depth, hazard and velocity, for floodplain areas. The impacts of climate change on different sources of flooding has been modelled or investigated in more detail. The cumulative impact of development has been considered. The presence of flood defences and residual risk, and the risk of structure blockage has also been assessed. The flood risk summary sheets and GeoPDF maps in Appendix A give flood risk information for each Level 2 site to support the application of the Sequential Test and inform the Council whether the Exception Test would be required. These summary sheets and maps form the main output of the Level 2 SFRA. If the Council finds them to pass the Sequential Test (and Exception test if appropriate), site-specific detailed flood risk assessments will be required on all of these sites to ensure that they are designed safely. The Level 1 and 2 SFRA has provided thorough recommendations on site specific requirements to be addressed by FRAs, guidance for site design and making development safe from flooding, and requirements for SuDS and surface water management. It is important to recognise that the SFRA has been developed using the best available information at the time of preparation. This relates both to the current risk of flooding from rivers, and the potential impacts of future climate change. In particular, the Environment Agency have indicated that at the time of publication they have commenced re-modelling of The Cut. Developers must ensure that they obtain and use the most up to date model data for detailed site-specific flood risk assessments. 2016s5363 - Bracknell Forest Council - SFRA L2 Final Report v5.0 (Sep 2019) iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ iii 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 2.2 SFRA objectives ................................................................................................................. 1 2.3 How to use the Level 2 SFRA ............................................................................................ 1 2.4 Stakeholder engagement ................................................................................................... 1 3 How were sites identified for a Level 2 assessment? ............................................ 2 4 What flood risk information has been used? ......................................................... 3 4.1 Data sources ...................................................................................................................... 3 4.2 Environment Agency detailed hydraulic models ................................................................. 3 5 How has climate change been assessed? ............................................................ 3 5.2 Fluvial flooding ................................................................................................................... 4 5.3 Surface water flooding ....................................................................................................... 4 5.4 Groundwater flooding ......................................................................................................... 4 6 How has residual risk been assessed? ................................................................. 5 6.2 Flood defence failure and overtopping ............................................................................... 5 6.3 Structure blockage ............................................................................................................. 5 7 How has cumulative impact of development been assessed? .............................. 5 8 How to interpret groundwater flood risk data ......................................................... 7 8.2 Interpreting the mapping .................................................................................................... 7 8.3 Consequences for spatial planning .................................................................................... 7 9 Level 2 site flood risk summaries .......................................................................... 8 9.2 Summary sheets ................................................................................................................ 8 9.3 Site maps ........................................................................................................................... 9 10 Future use of SFRA data ....................................................................................... 12 Appendices ......................................................................................................................... I A Level 2 site flood risk summary sheets and maps ................................................. I 2016s5363 - Bracknell Forest Council - SFRA L2 Final Report v5.0 (Sep 2019) List of Tables Table 2-1: Level 2 SFRA engagement ............................................................................... 2 Table 4-1: Environment Agency detailed hydraulic models within Bracknell Forest at the time of publication ............................................................................................. 3 Table 5-1: Climate change allowances ............................................................................... 4 Table 7-1: Potential for cumulative impact within a catchment .......................................... 7 Table 9-1: Site map explanatory
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Published in December 2014 RBWM Local Flood Risk Management Strategy December 2014 2 RBWM Local Flood Risk Management Strategy December 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART A: GENERAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................8 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................8 1.1 The Purpose of the Strategy ...........................................................................................8 1.2 Overview of the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead ................................................9 1.3 Types of flooding ....................................................................................................... 11 1.4 Who is this Strategy aimed at? .....................................................................................12 1.5 The period covered by the Strategy ...............................................................................12 1.6 The Objectives of the Strategy ......................................................................................12 1.7 Scrutiny and Review ...................................................................................................13 2 Legislative Context ..........................................................................................................14 2.1 The Pitt Review .........................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Loddon Catchment Implementation Plan
    Loddon Catchment Implementation Plan January 2012 – FOR COMMMENT (Version C2) Glossary.....................................................................................................................3 1 Introduction...................................................................................................6 2 Loddon catchment summary.......................................................................9 2.1 General Description .....................................................................................9 2.2 Catchment map........................................................................................... 10 3 Water body information ............................................................................. 11 3.1 Classification.................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Heavily Modified Water Bodies..................................................................... 11 4 Actions ........................................................................................................ 11 4.1 Operational monitoring (2010-12) ............................................................. 12 4.2 Investigations (2010-12)............................................................................. 12 4.3 Improvement actions (in place by 2012)................................................... 12 4.3.1 ‘Day Job’ activities.............................................................................................. 13 4.3.2 Field actions ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Scenarios Report – Grazeley, Twyford/Ruscombe and Barkham
    WOKINGHAM STRATEGIC GROWTH LOCATIONS Growth Scenarios Report - Grazeley, Twyford/Ruscombe and Barkham Square Prepared on behalf of WBC & WBDC By David Lock Associates & Peter Brett Associates June 2018 Wokingham Strategic Framework : Growth Scenarios Report Prepared on behalf of WBC & WBDC : By David Lock Associates & Peter Brett Associates : June 2018 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Summary of key considerations 30 Growth Scenario 1: 15,000 Homes 34 1.0 INTRODUCTION 6 Concept Plan 34 Purpose of the Strategic Framework Access & Movement 36 Commission 6 Infrastructure requirements 37 Relationship to Green Belt and agricultural Growth Scenario 2: 10,000 Homes 40 land quality 6 Concept Plan 40 Study Brief and Scope 7 Access & Movement 42 Role and Structure of this Report 8 Infrastructure requirements 42 2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY 10 Alternative 10,000 Home Growth Scenario 43 Growth Scenario 3: 5,000 Homes 44 Stage 1 Project Set-up and Baseline Concept Plan 46 Assessments 10 Access & Movement 46 Site Environmental Studies 10 Infrastructure requirements 46 Baseline Viability 10 Stage 2 Generating Growth Scenarios 10 5.0 BARKHAM SQUARE 48 Technical Workshops 10 Background and Analysis 48 Green and Blue 10 Site Environmental Studies: Summary Transport and Environmental Health 11 Findings 48 Community Wellbeing 11 Flooding & Drainage 48 Utilities 12 Transport & Highways 48 Community Workshops 12 Air Quality 48 Next Stages 13 Noise and Vibration 48 3.0 BASELINE VIABILITY 14 Geotechnical 49 Waste 50 Commercial Property Market 14 Agricultural Land 50 Residential
    [Show full text]
  • Wokingham Borough Landscape Character Assessment
    H Wokingham Borough Landscape Character Assessment Prepared by LUC for Wokingham Borough Council November 2019 Project Title: Wokingham Borough Landscape Character Assessment Client: Wokingham Borough Council Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1 30.10.18 Draft Report Alice Knight Katrina Davies Kate Ahern Katrina Davies 2 04.03.19 Draft Report for consultation Alice Knight Katrina Davies Kate Ahern Katrina Davies 3 19.03.19 Final draft for consultation Alice Knight Katrina Davies Katrina Davies 4 25.11.19 Final Report Alice Knight Katrina Davies Katrina Davies Wokingham Borough Landscape Character Assessment Last saved: 26/11/2019 16:43 Wokingham Borough Landscape Character Assessment Prepared by LUC for Wokingham Borough Council November 2019 Planning & EIA LUC LONDON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Design 250 Waterloo Road Bristol Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London Edinburgh Registered Office: Landscape Management SE1 8RD Glasgow 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)20 7383 5784 Lancaster London NW1 1JD GIS & Visualisation [email protected] Manchester FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper Contents Introduction 1 Context 1 The purpose of Landscape Character Assessment 4 Policy Context 5 Relationship to Published Landscape Studies 5 Background of the Wokingham Landscape Character Assessment 6 Summary of Method 6 Structure of this report 8 The Landscape of Wokingham Borough 9 Introduction 9 Physical Influences 9 Cultural Influences 23 Perceptual
    [Show full text]
  • Community Partnerships Overview and Scrutiny Panel
    COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY PANEL FLOODING & SUSTAINABLE PLANNING TASK & FINISH GROUP REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS JANUARY 2011 { PAGE } CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 BACKGROUND 1 2.1 Membership of the Task & Finish Group 1 2.2 Terms of Reference 1 3 RECOMMENDATIONS 2 4 REPORT 3 4.1 National & Local Policy Context 3 4.2 Information Gathering – 2001 Flooding Review 4 4.3 Information Gathering – Loddon Valley Residents’ 5 Association 4.4 Information Gathering – Environment Agency 6 4.5 Information Gathering – Thames Water 8 5 CONCLUSIONS 9 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 10 7 GLOSSARY 11 8 APPENDIX: 2001 REPORT 12 { PAGE } 1. INTRODUCTION This group has been conducting a review of Wokingham Borough Council’s flooding and sustainable planning policies since October 2010, and also called on witnesses from the Environment Agency, Thames Water, the Loddon Valley Residents’ Association, Wokingham Borough Council and the Executive to give a wider view as to the policy area. 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 Membership of the Flooding & Sustainable Planning Task & Finish Group Councillors Tim Holton (Chairman), Phil Challis, Norman Gould and Emma Hobbs. 2.2 Terms of reference 2.2.1 To find out previous work on the issue of flooding undertaken by Wokingham Borough / District Council. 2.2.2 To investigate previous measures taken on flooding, other potential solutions to flooding problems and their effects. 2.2.3 To research the impact of sustainable policies and investigate other potential solutions to flooding problems and their effects. 3. RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 The Flooding & Sustainable Planning Task & Finish Group recommends that the Community Partnerships Overview and Scrutiny Panel approves the recommendations of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Wokingham Borough Council Biodiversity Action Plan 2012-2024 June 2014
    Photo: © Jon Cole WOKINGHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN 2012-2024 JUNE 2014 1 2 Foreword Wokingham Borough Council is committed to ensuring we preserve and where possible enhance our natural environment whilst also accommodating the necessary housing developments to meet local housing needs. The borough enjoys a very varied and special natural environment which provides residents with valued opportunities for outdoor recreation, enjoyment of nature and to take an active role in supporting this natural environment. This document updates the first Biodiversity Action Plan and will raise awareness of the issues which impact on local biodiversity, encourages and gives targets for action and ensures our polices are in place to protect, manage and where possible enhance local flora and fauna. As a member of the council's executive, I am committed to ensuring we consider our environment with great care. I look forward to working with residents and groups to support this Plan. Angus Ross Executive Member for Environment 3 WOKINGHAM BOROUGH BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN 2012-2024 The Wokingham Biodiversity Action Plan is divided into the following three sections: PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND PART 2: LEGISLATION AND PROTECTIVE POLICIES PART 3: HABITAT ACTION PLANS (WITH LINKS TO ASSOCIATED SPECIES) GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS ASNW Ancient Semi Natural Woodland BAP Biodiversity Action Plan BARS Biodiversity Actions Reporting System BBOWT Berkshire Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust BLNP Berkshire Local Nature Partnership
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
    Central & Eastern Berkshire Authorities Joint Minerals & Waste Plan Strategic Flood Risk Assessment July 2018 (Draft Plan) Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 What is the purpose of this Assessment? ............................................................... 1 What is the Joint Minerals & Waste Plan (JMWP)? ................................................ 1 Lead Local Flood Authorities - Roles and responsibilities ....................................... 2 SFRA methodology ................................................................................................. 3 2. Flood Risk – High Level Review .......................................................................... 5 3. Site Specific Analysis ......................................................................................... 23 Methodology ......................................................................................................... 25 Colne Catchment…………………………………………………………………………..27 Maidenhead Catchment…………………………………………………………………..32 Loddon Catchment………….…………………….…………………………...…………..40 4. Conclusions ....................................................................................................... 42 Map 1: Central and Eastern Berkshire River Catchments and Identified Sites…...….4 Map 2: Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead River Catchments………………6 Map 3: Reading Borough Council River Catchments……………………………………9 Map 4: Bracknell Forest Council River
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (Level 1 SFRA) a Technical Report Supporting the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Borough Local Plan
    Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (Level 1 SFRA) A Technical Report Supporting the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Borough Local Plan September 2016 (Revision 07) DRAFT Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Planning and Property Services Town Hall St Ives Road Maidenhead SL6 1RF STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT (SFRA) A Technical Report Supporting the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Borough Local Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead (RBWM) is located in the east of Berkshire, between Slough, Wokingham and Bracknell. The River Thames forms the northern and eastern boundaries of the Royal Borough and is a major source of flood risk to properties within the Royal Borough, including core centres of future growth, such as Maidenhead, Windsor and Wraysbury). Tributaries of the River Thames including The Cut, the River Colne, the Bourne and Twyford Brook (a tributary of the River Loddon) also pose a flood risk to the Royal Borough. A considerable proportion of the Royal Borough is at risk of flooding from a number of sources including river flooding, localised runoff, sewer and groundwater flooding. Flooding can result not only in costly damage to property, but can also pose a risk to life, health and livelihood. It is therefore, essential that the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead in its role as the Local Planning Authority, Lead Local Flood Authority and Emergency Planning Authority is in a position where it is able to make informed decisions to ensure future development proposals are steered away from areas that are at the greatest risk from flooding, and ensuring that it does not exacerbate existing known flooding problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Environment Agency Plan Lower Thames LEAP
    E n v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y Local environment agency plan Lower Thames LEAP (Hurley to Teddington) Third Annual Review December 2001 Lower Thames - LEAP Overview Key: ---- LEAP Boundary E n v ir o n m e n t ' " Watercourses A g e n c y uisinci & LrOunty ooroers Maps are reproduced from Ordnance Survey 1150,000 scale map by the Environment Agency with permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, ©Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number GD 031 77G. Contents Introduction The Lower Thames LEAP A rea................................................................................................................ 1 The Lower Thames Catchment Vision................................................................................................. 1 The Environment Agency - who are we?.......................................................................................... 1 Local Environment Agency Plans (LEAPs).......................................................................................... 2 Talking to our Stakeholders...................................................................................................................... 2 'An Environmental Vision'.......................................................................................................................... 2 Local Contributions.......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wokingham Borough Strategic Flood Risk Assessment February 2012
    Wokingham Borough Council Wokingham Borough Strategic Flood Risk Assessment February 2012 Halcrow Group Limited Wokingham Borough Council Wokingham Borough Strategic Flood Risk Assessment February 2012 Halcrow Group Limited Halcrow Group Limited Elms House, 43 Brook Green, Hammersmith, London W6 7EF Tel +44 (0)20 3479 8000 Fax +44 (0)20 3479 8001 www.halcrow.com Halcrow Group Limited has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of their client, Wokingham Borough Council, for their sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. © Halcrow Group Limited 2012 Halcrow Group Limited Elms House, 43 Brook Green, Hammersmith, London W6 7EF Tel +44 (0)20 3479 8000 Fax +44 (0)20 3479 8001 www.halcrow.com Wokingham Borough Council Wokingham Borough Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Contents Amendment Record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Issue Revision Description Date Signed 1 1 Draft Report Dec 2010 AS/BV 2 1 Draft Report May 2011 AS 3 1 Draft Report July 2011 AS 4 1 Final Report July 2011 AS 5 1 Final Report after review August 2011 AS 6 2 Final Report after review August 2011 AS 7 1 Final Report after review September 2011 AS 8 1 Final Report after review October 2011 AS 9 1 Final Report after review November 2011 AS 10 1 Final report December 2011 BV 11 1 Final report (additional December 2011 BV LDF sites) 12 1 Final report (additional February 2012 ER LDF sites) Wokingham Borough Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (February 2012) Contents 1 Executive
    [Show full text]
  • Description Landscape Character Areas
    Description The LCT is characterised by a shelving and undulating landform underlain by London Clay. There are large tracts of post-war settlement, connected by both major and minor roads cutting across the landscape. Areas of large arable fields remain, as well as tributaries draining towards the Loddon. Landscape Character Areas The Settled and Farmed Clay LCT is subdivided into four Landscape Character Areas: • J1: Wokingham-Winnersh Settled and Farmed Clay • J2: Arborfield Cross and Barkham Settled and Farmed Clay • J3: Spencers Wood Settled and Farmed Clay • J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay Wokingham Borough Landscape Character Assessment 225 November 2019 J1: Wokingham-Winnersh SettledFarmed Clay and I4 E J4 C2 B1 I1 A2 Bracknell C1 Forest L1 N1 J2 Settlement Boundary 0 0.5 1 SDL Boundary km M1 © Crown copyright and database rights 2019 Ordnance Survey 0100031673 Character Area J1: Wokingham-Winnersh Settled and Farmed Clay SUMMARY The area encompasses large areas of urban development, including the northern half of Wokingham and residential areas of Winnersh (which do not form part of this assessment). Small areas of arable fields and open space between these larger urban areas separate the settlements. The area is fragmented by large transport corridors including the M4 and A329 (M). The Wokingham-Winnersh Settled and Farmed Clay stretches from the edge of the Winnersh Triangle east towards the borough boundary. The boundaries have largely been informed by land use patterns. The northern and eastern boundaries follow the A329 (M), and mark the edge of character area I1: Ashridge Farmed Clay Lowland. The western boundaries are the transition to the wooded character of L1: Bearwood Wooded Sand and Gravel Hills and the river influences of C1: Arborfield River Terrace.
    [Show full text]
  • Borough Local Plan: Consultation Version (December 2016) Contents
    Borough Local Plan: Consultation Version (December 2016) Contents Foreword 8 1 Introduction 10 1.1 Introduction 10 1.2 Preparation of the Borough Local Plan 10 1.3 Evidence base 10 1.4 Policy context 11 1.5 Neighbourhood Plans 11 1.6 Duty to Cooperate 11 1.7 How can I express my views? 12 2 List of Policies 15 3 Spatial Portrait 18 3.1 Context 18 3.2 Linkages to surrounding areas 18 3.3 Natural and built environments 18 3.4 Community 19 3.5 Economic prosperity 20 3.6 Climate change 21 3.7 Key spatial issues 22 4 Spatial Vision and Objectives 24 4.1 Spatial vision 24 4.2 Objectives 25 5 Spatial Strategy 30 5.1 Strategic context 30 5.2 Housing needs 30 5.3 Economic development needs 30 5.4 Retail needs 33 5.5 Development of spatial strategy 34 5.6 Land availability 36 5.7 Sustainability appraisal 37 5.8 Site selection 37 5.9 Policy SP1 Spatial Strategy 38 5.10 Sustainable and community led development 39 5.11 Policy SP2 Community Led Development 40 6 Quality of Place 42 6.1 Context 42 Borough Local Plan: Consultation Version (December 2016) Contents 6.2 Design 42 6.3 Policy SP3 Design 43 6.4 Townscape and landscape 45 6.5 Policy SP4 Townscape and Landscape 45 6.6 River Thames Corridor 45 6.7 Policy SP5 River Thames Corridor 47 6.8 Green Belt 47 6.9 Policy SP6 Development in the Green Belt 51 6.10 Countryside character 52 6.11 Policy SP7 Countryside Character 53 7 Housing 55 7.1 Context 55 7.2 Amount and distribution 55 7.3 Housing development sites 58 7.4 Policy HO1 Housing Development Sites 58 7.5 Meeting housing need 61 7.6 Policy HO2
    [Show full text]