Agenda Item 22

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Agenda Item 22 Agenda Item 22. Application Expiry Date Parish Ward Number 172704 9 August 2018 Twyford Twyford Applicant Hicks Development Ltd Site Address Land to rear of 38 – 42 Hurst Road, Twyford RG10 0AN Proposal Full application for the proposed erection of 5no dwellings Type Full PS Category 13 Officer Simon Taylor Reason for Listed by Councillor Ferris determination by committee FOR CONSIDERATION BY Planning Committee on Tuesday 17 July 2018 REPORT PREPARED BY Assistant Director – Place SUMMARY The site is within a major development location on the western outskirts of Twyford. It forms part of a wider allocated site for residential use in the Development Plan with the construction of 12 dwellings already occurring across the southern part of the allocation following the granting of planning permission F/2014/2353. Through the provision of both applications, 17 dwellings would be provided which would fall short of the 20 dwellings envisaged for the site. Nonetheless, the allocation is designed to be flexible to take account of site specific issues, particularly flood risk from the River Loddon and Twyford Brook on the western end of the site. In this respect, a shortfall of three dwellings is acceptable. The application involves the construction of five two storey dwellings and a double garage, in the form of a pair of semi-detached dwellings and three terraced dwellings. It also includes an access road (continuing from the existing road in the site to the south), parking and amenity space to the south western end. As the site has been allocated for residential use, there are no in principle objections to the impact of development on the character of the area with the proposal of similar scale and design to the adjacent site currently being constructed which was also acceptable. The proposal would provide sufficient parking and amenity space and a satisfactory internal layout. It would also not cause adverse harm to neighbouring residential amenity and there would be an acceptable impact in ecological and landscape terms. It is, however, located across flood zones 1, 2 and 3 and the vast majority of the submissions against the proposal relate to drainage and flooding implications. A site specific Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) was initially submitted and found to be lacking in several respects. A revised FRA was submitted to the Environment Agency, who now raise no objection, subject to Condition 13 and Informative 6. The proposal is acceptable, subject to conditions and would bring forward a site envisaged for development and would contribute to housing provision within the Borough. It is recommended for approval subject to completion of a legal agreement and conditions. 47 PLANNING STATUS Major development location Allocated housing site Settlement Edge (Countryside to the western boundary) Near to Green Route (Hurst Road) Flood zones 1, 2 and 3 Groundwater zone 3 Wind turbine safeguarding zone Minerals consultation zone Sand and gravel extraction consultation zone (western boundary) Contaminated land consultation zone RECOMMENDATION That the committee authorise the GRANT OF PLANNING PERMISSION subject to the following: A. Prior completion of a legal agreement as outlined in this report to provide for contributions to affordable housing and an indemnity against claims for highways adoption. B. Conditions and informatives: 1. Timescale The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission. Reason: In pursuance of s.91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended by s.51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004). 2. Approved details This permission is in respect of the submitted drawings numbered 2393 02A and 2393 03A, dated 31 July 2017 and the drawing numbered 2392 04, dated 8 September 2017, all received by the local planning authority on 15 September 2017; the revised plan numbered 2393 01F, dated 10 April 2018 and received 26 April 2018 and the plan numbered 2393 101A, dated and received on 29 May 2018. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details unless otherwise agreed in writing by the local planning authority. Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and to ensure that the development is carried out in accordance with the application form and associated details hereby approved. 3. External materials and fencing details Before the development hereby permitted is commenced, samples and details of the materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the building/s and all boundary fencing details (including its location) shall have first been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. 48 Development shall not be carried out other than in accordance with the so- approved details unless agreed in writing by the local planning authority. Reason: To ensure that the external appearance of the building is satisfactory. Relevant policy: Core Strategy policies CP1 and CP3. Reason: To prevent increased flood risk from surface water run-off. Relevant policy: NPPF Section 10 (Meeting the Challenge of Climate Change, Flooding and Coastal Change), Core Strategy policy CP1 and Managing Development Delivery Local Plan policies CC09 and CC10. 4. Construction Method Statement No development shall take place until a Construction Method Statement has been submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority. The approved Statement shall be adhered to throughout the construction period. The Statement shall provide for: a) The parking of vehicles of site operatives and visitors b) Lorry routing and potential numbers c) Types of piling rig and earth moving machinery to be utilized d) Installation of temporary lighting e) Loading and unloading of plant and materials f) Storage of plant and materials used in constructing the development, g) The erection and maintenance of security hoarding including decorative displays and facilities for public viewing, where appropriate h) Wheel washing facilities i) Measures to control the emission of dust and dirt during construction j) A scheme for recycling/disposing of waste resulting from construction works Reason: In the interests of highway safety & convenience and neighbour amenities. Relevant policy: Core Strategy policies CP3 & CP6. 5. Biodiversity Enhancements No development shall take place until details of biodiversity enhancements, to include bird and bat boxes, tiles or bricks on and around the new buildings and native and wildlife friendly landscape planting have been submitted and approved in writing by the local planning authority. Development shall not be carried out other than in accordance with the so-approved details. Reason: To incorporate biodiversity in and around developments in accordance with Paragraphs 109 and 118 of the NPPF. Relevant policy: NPPF Section 11 (Conserving and Enhancing the Natural Environment). Core Strategy policy CP7. 6. Landscaping details Prior to the commencement of the development, there shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority a scheme of landscaping, which shall specify species, planting sizes, spacing and numbers of trees/shrubs to be planted, and any existing trees or shrubs to be retained. 49 Planting shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details in the first planting and seeding seasons following the occupation of the building(s). Any trees or plants which, within a period of 5 years from the date of the planting (or within a period of 5 years of the occupation of the buildings in the case of retained trees and shrubs) die, are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased shall be replaced in the next planting season with others of similar size and species or otherwise as approved in writing by the local planning authority. Reason: To ensure adequate planting in the interests of visual amenity. Relevant policy: Core Strategy policy CP3 and Managing Development Delivery Local Plan policies CC03 and TB21 (and TB06 for garden development) 7. Tree Protection details No development or other operation shall commence on site until an Arboricultural Method Statement and Scheme of Works which provides for the retention and protection of trees, shrubs and hedges growing on or adjacent to the site in accordance with BS5837: 2012 has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. No development or other operations shall take place except in complete accordance with the details as so-approved (hereinafter referred to as the Approved Scheme). No development (including any tree felling, tree pruning, demolition works, soil moving, temporary access construction and or widening or any other operation involving use of motorised vehicles or construction machinery) shall commence until the local planning authority has been provided (by way of a written notice) with a period of no less than 7 working days to inspect the implementation of the measures identified in the Approved Scheme on-site. No excavations for services, storage of materials or machinery, parking of vehicles, deposit or excavation of soil or rubble, lighting of fires or disposal of liquids shall take place within an area designated as being fenced off or otherwise protected in the Approved Scheme. The fencing or other works which are part of the Approved Scheme shall not be moved or removed, temporarily or otherwise, until all works including external works have been completed and all equipment, machinery and surplus materials removed from the site, unless the prior approval of the local planning authority has first been sought and obtained. Reason: To secure the protection throughout the time that the development is being carried out of trees shrubs or hedges growing within or adjacent to the site which are of amenity value to the area, and to allow for verification by the local planning authority that the necessary measures are in place before development and other works commence Relevant policy: Core Strategy policy CP3 and Managing Development Delivery Local Plan policies CC03 and TB21.
Recommended publications
  • Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Published in December 2014 RBWM Local Flood Risk Management Strategy December 2014 2 RBWM Local Flood Risk Management Strategy December 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART A: GENERAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................8 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................8 1.1 The Purpose of the Strategy ...........................................................................................8 1.2 Overview of the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead ................................................9 1.3 Types of flooding ....................................................................................................... 11 1.4 Who is this Strategy aimed at? .....................................................................................12 1.5 The period covered by the Strategy ...............................................................................12 1.6 The Objectives of the Strategy ......................................................................................12 1.7 Scrutiny and Review ...................................................................................................13 2 Legislative Context ..........................................................................................................14 2.1 The Pitt Review .........................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Loddon Catchment Implementation Plan
    Loddon Catchment Implementation Plan January 2012 – FOR COMMMENT (Version C2) Glossary.....................................................................................................................3 1 Introduction...................................................................................................6 2 Loddon catchment summary.......................................................................9 2.1 General Description .....................................................................................9 2.2 Catchment map........................................................................................... 10 3 Water body information ............................................................................. 11 3.1 Classification.................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Heavily Modified Water Bodies..................................................................... 11 4 Actions ........................................................................................................ 11 4.1 Operational monitoring (2010-12) ............................................................. 12 4.2 Investigations (2010-12)............................................................................. 12 4.3 Improvement actions (in place by 2012)................................................... 12 4.3.1 ‘Day Job’ activities.............................................................................................. 13 4.3.2 Field actions ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Scenarios Report – Grazeley, Twyford/Ruscombe and Barkham
    WOKINGHAM STRATEGIC GROWTH LOCATIONS Growth Scenarios Report - Grazeley, Twyford/Ruscombe and Barkham Square Prepared on behalf of WBC & WBDC By David Lock Associates & Peter Brett Associates June 2018 Wokingham Strategic Framework : Growth Scenarios Report Prepared on behalf of WBC & WBDC : By David Lock Associates & Peter Brett Associates : June 2018 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Summary of key considerations 30 Growth Scenario 1: 15,000 Homes 34 1.0 INTRODUCTION 6 Concept Plan 34 Purpose of the Strategic Framework Access & Movement 36 Commission 6 Infrastructure requirements 37 Relationship to Green Belt and agricultural Growth Scenario 2: 10,000 Homes 40 land quality 6 Concept Plan 40 Study Brief and Scope 7 Access & Movement 42 Role and Structure of this Report 8 Infrastructure requirements 42 2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY 10 Alternative 10,000 Home Growth Scenario 43 Growth Scenario 3: 5,000 Homes 44 Stage 1 Project Set-up and Baseline Concept Plan 46 Assessments 10 Access & Movement 46 Site Environmental Studies 10 Infrastructure requirements 46 Baseline Viability 10 Stage 2 Generating Growth Scenarios 10 5.0 BARKHAM SQUARE 48 Technical Workshops 10 Background and Analysis 48 Green and Blue 10 Site Environmental Studies: Summary Transport and Environmental Health 11 Findings 48 Community Wellbeing 11 Flooding & Drainage 48 Utilities 12 Transport & Highways 48 Community Workshops 12 Air Quality 48 Next Stages 13 Noise and Vibration 48 3.0 BASELINE VIABILITY 14 Geotechnical 49 Waste 50 Commercial Property Market 14 Agricultural Land 50 Residential
    [Show full text]
  • Wokingham Borough Landscape Character Assessment
    H Wokingham Borough Landscape Character Assessment Prepared by LUC for Wokingham Borough Council November 2019 Project Title: Wokingham Borough Landscape Character Assessment Client: Wokingham Borough Council Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1 30.10.18 Draft Report Alice Knight Katrina Davies Kate Ahern Katrina Davies 2 04.03.19 Draft Report for consultation Alice Knight Katrina Davies Kate Ahern Katrina Davies 3 19.03.19 Final draft for consultation Alice Knight Katrina Davies Katrina Davies 4 25.11.19 Final Report Alice Knight Katrina Davies Katrina Davies Wokingham Borough Landscape Character Assessment Last saved: 26/11/2019 16:43 Wokingham Borough Landscape Character Assessment Prepared by LUC for Wokingham Borough Council November 2019 Planning & EIA LUC LONDON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Design 250 Waterloo Road Bristol Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London Edinburgh Registered Office: Landscape Management SE1 8RD Glasgow 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)20 7383 5784 Lancaster London NW1 1JD GIS & Visualisation [email protected] Manchester FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper Contents Introduction 1 Context 1 The purpose of Landscape Character Assessment 4 Policy Context 5 Relationship to Published Landscape Studies 5 Background of the Wokingham Landscape Character Assessment 6 Summary of Method 6 Structure of this report 8 The Landscape of Wokingham Borough 9 Introduction 9 Physical Influences 9 Cultural Influences 23 Perceptual
    [Show full text]
  • Community Partnerships Overview and Scrutiny Panel
    COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY PANEL FLOODING & SUSTAINABLE PLANNING TASK & FINISH GROUP REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS JANUARY 2011 { PAGE } CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 BACKGROUND 1 2.1 Membership of the Task & Finish Group 1 2.2 Terms of Reference 1 3 RECOMMENDATIONS 2 4 REPORT 3 4.1 National & Local Policy Context 3 4.2 Information Gathering – 2001 Flooding Review 4 4.3 Information Gathering – Loddon Valley Residents’ 5 Association 4.4 Information Gathering – Environment Agency 6 4.5 Information Gathering – Thames Water 8 5 CONCLUSIONS 9 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 10 7 GLOSSARY 11 8 APPENDIX: 2001 REPORT 12 { PAGE } 1. INTRODUCTION This group has been conducting a review of Wokingham Borough Council’s flooding and sustainable planning policies since October 2010, and also called on witnesses from the Environment Agency, Thames Water, the Loddon Valley Residents’ Association, Wokingham Borough Council and the Executive to give a wider view as to the policy area. 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 Membership of the Flooding & Sustainable Planning Task & Finish Group Councillors Tim Holton (Chairman), Phil Challis, Norman Gould and Emma Hobbs. 2.2 Terms of reference 2.2.1 To find out previous work on the issue of flooding undertaken by Wokingham Borough / District Council. 2.2.2 To investigate previous measures taken on flooding, other potential solutions to flooding problems and their effects. 2.2.3 To research the impact of sustainable policies and investigate other potential solutions to flooding problems and their effects. 3. RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 The Flooding & Sustainable Planning Task & Finish Group recommends that the Community Partnerships Overview and Scrutiny Panel approves the recommendations of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Wokingham Borough Council Biodiversity Action Plan 2012-2024 June 2014
    Photo: © Jon Cole WOKINGHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN 2012-2024 JUNE 2014 1 2 Foreword Wokingham Borough Council is committed to ensuring we preserve and where possible enhance our natural environment whilst also accommodating the necessary housing developments to meet local housing needs. The borough enjoys a very varied and special natural environment which provides residents with valued opportunities for outdoor recreation, enjoyment of nature and to take an active role in supporting this natural environment. This document updates the first Biodiversity Action Plan and will raise awareness of the issues which impact on local biodiversity, encourages and gives targets for action and ensures our polices are in place to protect, manage and where possible enhance local flora and fauna. As a member of the council's executive, I am committed to ensuring we consider our environment with great care. I look forward to working with residents and groups to support this Plan. Angus Ross Executive Member for Environment 3 WOKINGHAM BOROUGH BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN 2012-2024 The Wokingham Biodiversity Action Plan is divided into the following three sections: PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND PART 2: LEGISLATION AND PROTECTIVE POLICIES PART 3: HABITAT ACTION PLANS (WITH LINKS TO ASSOCIATED SPECIES) GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS ASNW Ancient Semi Natural Woodland BAP Biodiversity Action Plan BARS Biodiversity Actions Reporting System BBOWT Berkshire Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust BLNP Berkshire Local Nature Partnership
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
    Central & Eastern Berkshire Authorities Joint Minerals & Waste Plan Strategic Flood Risk Assessment July 2018 (Draft Plan) Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 What is the purpose of this Assessment? ............................................................... 1 What is the Joint Minerals & Waste Plan (JMWP)? ................................................ 1 Lead Local Flood Authorities - Roles and responsibilities ....................................... 2 SFRA methodology ................................................................................................. 3 2. Flood Risk – High Level Review .......................................................................... 5 3. Site Specific Analysis ......................................................................................... 23 Methodology ......................................................................................................... 25 Colne Catchment…………………………………………………………………………..27 Maidenhead Catchment…………………………………………………………………..32 Loddon Catchment………….…………………….…………………………...…………..40 4. Conclusions ....................................................................................................... 42 Map 1: Central and Eastern Berkshire River Catchments and Identified Sites…...….4 Map 2: Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead River Catchments………………6 Map 3: Reading Borough Council River Catchments……………………………………9 Map 4: Bracknell Forest Council River
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (Level 1 SFRA) a Technical Report Supporting the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Borough Local Plan
    Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (Level 1 SFRA) A Technical Report Supporting the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Borough Local Plan September 2016 (Revision 07) DRAFT Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Planning and Property Services Town Hall St Ives Road Maidenhead SL6 1RF STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT (SFRA) A Technical Report Supporting the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Borough Local Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead (RBWM) is located in the east of Berkshire, between Slough, Wokingham and Bracknell. The River Thames forms the northern and eastern boundaries of the Royal Borough and is a major source of flood risk to properties within the Royal Borough, including core centres of future growth, such as Maidenhead, Windsor and Wraysbury). Tributaries of the River Thames including The Cut, the River Colne, the Bourne and Twyford Brook (a tributary of the River Loddon) also pose a flood risk to the Royal Borough. A considerable proportion of the Royal Borough is at risk of flooding from a number of sources including river flooding, localised runoff, sewer and groundwater flooding. Flooding can result not only in costly damage to property, but can also pose a risk to life, health and livelihood. It is therefore, essential that the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead in its role as the Local Planning Authority, Lead Local Flood Authority and Emergency Planning Authority is in a position where it is able to make informed decisions to ensure future development proposals are steered away from areas that are at the greatest risk from flooding, and ensuring that it does not exacerbate existing known flooding problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Environment Agency Plan Lower Thames LEAP
    E n v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y Local environment agency plan Lower Thames LEAP (Hurley to Teddington) Third Annual Review December 2001 Lower Thames - LEAP Overview Key: ---- LEAP Boundary E n v ir o n m e n t ' " Watercourses A g e n c y uisinci & LrOunty ooroers Maps are reproduced from Ordnance Survey 1150,000 scale map by the Environment Agency with permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, ©Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number GD 031 77G. Contents Introduction The Lower Thames LEAP A rea................................................................................................................ 1 The Lower Thames Catchment Vision................................................................................................. 1 The Environment Agency - who are we?.......................................................................................... 1 Local Environment Agency Plans (LEAPs).......................................................................................... 2 Talking to our Stakeholders...................................................................................................................... 2 'An Environmental Vision'.......................................................................................................................... 2 Local Contributions.......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wokingham Borough Strategic Flood Risk Assessment February 2012
    Wokingham Borough Council Wokingham Borough Strategic Flood Risk Assessment February 2012 Halcrow Group Limited Wokingham Borough Council Wokingham Borough Strategic Flood Risk Assessment February 2012 Halcrow Group Limited Halcrow Group Limited Elms House, 43 Brook Green, Hammersmith, London W6 7EF Tel +44 (0)20 3479 8000 Fax +44 (0)20 3479 8001 www.halcrow.com Halcrow Group Limited has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of their client, Wokingham Borough Council, for their sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. © Halcrow Group Limited 2012 Halcrow Group Limited Elms House, 43 Brook Green, Hammersmith, London W6 7EF Tel +44 (0)20 3479 8000 Fax +44 (0)20 3479 8001 www.halcrow.com Wokingham Borough Council Wokingham Borough Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Contents Amendment Record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Issue Revision Description Date Signed 1 1 Draft Report Dec 2010 AS/BV 2 1 Draft Report May 2011 AS 3 1 Draft Report July 2011 AS 4 1 Final Report July 2011 AS 5 1 Final Report after review August 2011 AS 6 2 Final Report after review August 2011 AS 7 1 Final Report after review September 2011 AS 8 1 Final Report after review October 2011 AS 9 1 Final Report after review November 2011 AS 10 1 Final report December 2011 BV 11 1 Final report (additional December 2011 BV LDF sites) 12 1 Final report (additional February 2012 ER LDF sites) Wokingham Borough Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (February 2012) Contents 1 Executive
    [Show full text]
  • Description Landscape Character Areas
    Description The LCT is characterised by a shelving and undulating landform underlain by London Clay. There are large tracts of post-war settlement, connected by both major and minor roads cutting across the landscape. Areas of large arable fields remain, as well as tributaries draining towards the Loddon. Landscape Character Areas The Settled and Farmed Clay LCT is subdivided into four Landscape Character Areas: • J1: Wokingham-Winnersh Settled and Farmed Clay • J2: Arborfield Cross and Barkham Settled and Farmed Clay • J3: Spencers Wood Settled and Farmed Clay • J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay Wokingham Borough Landscape Character Assessment 225 November 2019 J1: Wokingham-Winnersh SettledFarmed Clay and I4 E J4 C2 B1 I1 A2 Bracknell C1 Forest L1 N1 J2 Settlement Boundary 0 0.5 1 SDL Boundary km M1 © Crown copyright and database rights 2019 Ordnance Survey 0100031673 Character Area J1: Wokingham-Winnersh Settled and Farmed Clay SUMMARY The area encompasses large areas of urban development, including the northern half of Wokingham and residential areas of Winnersh (which do not form part of this assessment). Small areas of arable fields and open space between these larger urban areas separate the settlements. The area is fragmented by large transport corridors including the M4 and A329 (M). The Wokingham-Winnersh Settled and Farmed Clay stretches from the edge of the Winnersh Triangle east towards the borough boundary. The boundaries have largely been informed by land use patterns. The northern and eastern boundaries follow the A329 (M), and mark the edge of character area I1: Ashridge Farmed Clay Lowland. The western boundaries are the transition to the wooded character of L1: Bearwood Wooded Sand and Gravel Hills and the river influences of C1: Arborfield River Terrace.
    [Show full text]
  • Borough Local Plan: Consultation Version (December 2016) Contents
    Borough Local Plan: Consultation Version (December 2016) Contents Foreword 8 1 Introduction 10 1.1 Introduction 10 1.2 Preparation of the Borough Local Plan 10 1.3 Evidence base 10 1.4 Policy context 11 1.5 Neighbourhood Plans 11 1.6 Duty to Cooperate 11 1.7 How can I express my views? 12 2 List of Policies 15 3 Spatial Portrait 18 3.1 Context 18 3.2 Linkages to surrounding areas 18 3.3 Natural and built environments 18 3.4 Community 19 3.5 Economic prosperity 20 3.6 Climate change 21 3.7 Key spatial issues 22 4 Spatial Vision and Objectives 24 4.1 Spatial vision 24 4.2 Objectives 25 5 Spatial Strategy 30 5.1 Strategic context 30 5.2 Housing needs 30 5.3 Economic development needs 30 5.4 Retail needs 33 5.5 Development of spatial strategy 34 5.6 Land availability 36 5.7 Sustainability appraisal 37 5.8 Site selection 37 5.9 Policy SP1 Spatial Strategy 38 5.10 Sustainable and community led development 39 5.11 Policy SP2 Community Led Development 40 6 Quality of Place 42 6.1 Context 42 Borough Local Plan: Consultation Version (December 2016) Contents 6.2 Design 42 6.3 Policy SP3 Design 43 6.4 Townscape and landscape 45 6.5 Policy SP4 Townscape and Landscape 45 6.6 River Thames Corridor 45 6.7 Policy SP5 River Thames Corridor 47 6.8 Green Belt 47 6.9 Policy SP6 Development in the Green Belt 51 6.10 Countryside character 52 6.11 Policy SP7 Countryside Character 53 7 Housing 55 7.1 Context 55 7.2 Amount and distribution 55 7.3 Housing development sites 58 7.4 Policy HO1 Housing Development Sites 58 7.5 Meeting housing need 61 7.6 Policy HO2
    [Show full text]