DOCSLIB.ORG

D.1.2 Final Specification of Iot-Enabled Autonomous Driving Use Cases

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
D.1.2 Final Specification of Iot-Enabled Autonomous Driving Use Cases Grant Agreement Number: 731993 Project acronym: AUTOPILOT Project full title: AUTOmated driving Progressed by Internet Of Things D.1.2 Final Specification of IoT-enabled Autonomous Driving use cases Due delivery date: 30/09/2019 Actual delivery date: 20/09/2019 Organization name of lead participant for this deliverable: TNO Dissemination level PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission RE Services) Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission CO Services) This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 731993. Document Control Sheet Deliverable number: D1.2 Deliverable responsible: TNO Workpackage: WP1, Task1.1 Editor: Emi Mathews, Antoine Schmeitz, and Sven Jansen - TNO Author(s) – in alphabetical order Name Organisation E-mail Alen, Silvia CTAG [email protected] Alvarez, Manuel PSA [email protected] Cabrero Barros, Sergio IBMIE [email protected] Chapuis, Cédric Continental [email protected] Copel, Délia VGP [email protected] David, Martin GEM [email protected] Falcitelli, Mariano CNIT [email protected] Ioannis Gkragkopoulos CERTH/HIT [email protected] Jansen, Sven TNO [email protected] Kahale, Elie AKKA [email protected] Kostas Kalogirou CERTH/HIT [email protected] Kaul, Robert DLR [email protected] Marcasuzaa, Herve VCDA [email protected] Martínez, José Manuel CTAG [email protected] Mathews, Emi TNO [email protected] Monroy, Manuel VIGO [email protected] Nikolaou, Stella CERTH [email protected] Ouden, Jos den TUEIN [email protected] Petrescu, Alexandre CEA [email protected] jean-francois.simeon@continental- Simeon, Jean-François CONTI corporation.com Schmeitz, Antoine TNO [email protected] Schreiner, Floriane VED [email protected] Scholliers, Johan VTT [email protected] Simonetto, Andrea IBMIE [email protected] Teerhuis, Arjan TNO [email protected] Touko Tcheumadjeu, Louis C. DLR [email protected] Van den Ende, A.H. Bram TNO [email protected] Vivero, Antonio VIGO [email protected] Zougari, Sadeq AKKA [email protected] Document Revision History Version Date Modifications Introduced Modification Reason Modified by V0.1 13/05/2019 First draft requesting contributions E. Mathews V0.4 31/05/2019 Frist integrated version with E. Mathews, pilot site and use contributions from pilot site and case leaders 2 use case leaders V0.5 21/06/2019 Revised version with missing E. Mathews contributions V0.6 24/06/2019 Document for internal review R. Kaul and S. Nikolaou V0.8 22/07/2019 Revisions following review Pilot site and use case leaders V0.9 30/07/2019 Revised and integrated version E. Mathews and A. Petrescu V1.0 22/08/2019 Final version R. Bhandari Abstract This document presents the final specification of use cases aimed to assess the potential of Internet of Things for enhancement and enabling of Automated Driving. A description of the use cases is provided for five European pilot sites and the Korean pilot site, each offering specific scenarios of interest. The potential of the Internet of Things to progress Automated Driving beyond the state of the art is explained by way of hypotheses on the impact of IoT on these use cases along with a set of performance indicators to evaluate them. The document is based on the experience gained during the realisation of the project, as well as from the piloting activities. Legal Disclaimer The information in this document is provided “as is”, and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose. The above referenced consortium members shall have no liability to third parties for damages of any kind including without limitation direct, special, indirect, or consequential damages that may result from the use of these materials subject to any liability which is mandatory due to applicable law. © 2019 by AUTOPILOT Consortium. 3 Abbreviations and Acronyms Acronym Definition (C-)ITS (Cooperative) Intelligent Transport Systems ACC Adaptive Cruise Control AD Automated Driving ADAS Advanced Driver Assistance Systems ADS Automated Driving System AVP Automated Valet Parking BLE Bluetooth Low Energy BT Bluetooth CACC Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control CAM Cooperative Awareness Message CeH Connected Electronic Horizon DDT Dynamic Driving Task DITCM Dutch Integrated Testsite Cooperative Mobility DENM Decentralized Environmental Notification Message DMAG Data Modelling Activity Group in AUTOPILOT ETSI European Telecommunications Standards Institute FCA Fiat Chrysler Automobiles GA Grant Agreement GPS Global Positioning System HMI Human machine interface ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization IoT Internet of Things ISI Intersection Safety Information ISS Image Sensing System ITS Intelligent Transport Systems LIDAR Light Detection And Ranging LDM Local Dynamic Map MAP Map Data NAHSC National Automated Highway Systems Consortium OBU On-board Unit ODD Operational Design Domain OEDR Object and Event Detection and Response PoI Point of Interest PS Pilot Site QoS Quality of Service RADAR RAdio Detection And Ranging RFID Radio-Frequency Identification RHW Road Hazard Warning RSU Road Side Unit SAE Society of Automotive Engineers SAREF Smart Appliances REFerence SPat Signal Phase and Timing TLA Traffic Light Assist TCC Traffic Control Centre V2I/V2V/V2X Vehicle to Infrastructure / Vehicle / Everything VMS Variable Message Sign 4 VRU Vulnerable Road User (e.g. pedestrian, cyclist) WEF World Economic Forum WM World Model WP Work Package Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 12 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 14 1.1 Internet of Things (IoT) ......................................................................................................... 14 1.2 Purpose of the document ..................................................................................................... 14 1.3 Intended audience ................................................................................................................ 15 1.4 Definitions ............................................................................................................................. 15 1.5 Process .................................................................................................................................. 17 1.6 Outline of Document ............................................................................................................ 18 2 Specification of building blocks of IoT-enabled Autonomous Driving Use Cases ..................... 19 2.1 Automated Driving Modes .................................................................................................... 19 2.1.1 Automated Valet Parking .................................................................................................. 19 2.1.1.1 Function Description .............................................................................................................. 19 2.1.1.2 State of the Art ....................................................................................................................... 20 2.1.2 Highway Pilot .................................................................................................................... 21 2.1.2.1 Function Description .............................................................................................................. 21 2.1.2.2 State of the Art ....................................................................................................................... 22 2.1.3 Platooning ......................................................................................................................... 24 2.1.3.1 Function Description .............................................................................................................. 24 2.1.3.2 State of the Art ....................................................................................................................... 25 2.1.4 Urban Driving .................................................................................................................... 28 2.1.4.1 Function Description .............................................................................................................. 28 2.1.4.2 State of the Art ....................................................................................................................... 28 2.2 Services for AD vehicles ........................................................................................................ 31 2.2.1 Real-Time Ride sharing...................................................................................................... 31 2.2.1.1 Function Description .............................................................................................................. 31 2.2.1.2 State of the Art ....................................................................................................................... 32 2.2.2 Driverless car rebalancing ................................................................................................. 35 2.2.2.1 Function
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ridesharing with Zimride at the University of Utah
    LOST IN THE CROWD? RIDESHARING WITH ZIMRIDE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH An assessment prepared by Sean Bridegam, Jen Colby, Sach Combs, Majid Heidarifar, and Evan Kipnis for SUST 6000—Global Changes and Society May 2017 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of the Global Changes and Society course was to “develop an interdisciplinary perspective to explore the complex systems of environmental change and the links to society through a project- based approach” (University of Utah General Catalog). The focus for this year’s course was to air quality and global air quality issues. As transportation makes up more than half of pollutant source during winter time inversions in the Salt Lake Valley this project focused on non-single occupancy vehicle (SOV) options available to commuters. This assessment evaluated carpooling and specifically Zimride, a ride matching platform. The authors set out with the objective to complete a comprehensive assessment of the Zimride program at the University of Utah at the midpoint of a 3-year contract period. This evolved into a set of observations, evidence, and recommendations regarding alternative transportation more broadly. Our team essentially served as a consulting group for the primary campus program coordinator for Zimride, who provided us with a set of research questions and hypotheses to investigate. Based on the research findings detailed in this report, we can provide a set of recommendations to help increase the effectiveness of the program in the remaining contract period. Support and success of alternative transportation programs have been variable and may lag behind those of many peer institutions based on a review of STARS data.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Aspects of Electric Vehicles from Car-Sharing Systems
    energies Article Operational Aspects of Electric Vehicles from Car-Sharing Systems Katarzyna Turo´n 1,* , Andrzej Kubik 2 and Feng Chen 3 1 Department of Automotive Vehicle Construction, Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 8 Krasi´nskiegoStreet, 40-019 Katowice, Poland 2 Department of Automotive Vehicle Maintenance, Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 8 Krasi´nskiegoStreet, 40-019 Katowice, Poland; [email protected] 3 School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai JiaoTong University, No. 800 Dongchuan Road Minhang Campus, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 31 October 2019; Accepted: 2 December 2019; Published: 4 December 2019 Abstract: The article was dedicated to the topic of energy consumption of driving cars equipped with an electric motor. Due to the emerging demands for the excessive use of energy by vehicles (including car-sharing system vehicles), the authors carried out research to determine factors that affect the energy consumption. Due to the occurrence of a research gap related to the lack of reliable scientific information regarding real electricity consumption by vehicles used in car-sharing systems, the authors attempted to determine these values based on the proposed research experiment. The purpose of the research was to identify factors that increase energy consumption while driving in the case of car-sharing systems and developing recommendations for users of car-sharing systems and system operators in relation to energy consumption. Based on data received from car-sharing system operators and to their demands that users move cars uneconomically and use too much energy, the authors performed a scientific experiment based on Hartley’s plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Rose Langhorst Senior Vice President and Treasurer Enterprise Holdings Inc
    Rose Langhorst Senior Vice President and Treasurer Enterprise Holdings Inc. Rose Langhorst, Senior Vice President and Treasurer for Enterprise Holdings Inc., is a corporate officer and manages the global debt portfolio, as well as the company’s relationships with rating agencies, banks, investment bankers and investors. Enterprise Holdings operates – through an integrated global network of independent regional subsidiaries and franchises – the Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Alamo Rent A Car and National Car Rental brands, as well as more than 10,000 fully staffed neighborhood and airport locations in 100 countries and territories. Enterprise Holdings is the largest car rental company in the world, as measured by revenue and fleet. In addition, Enterprise Holdings is the most comprehensive service provider and only investment-grade company in the U.S. car rental industry. The company and its affiliate Enterprise Fleet Management together offer a total transportation solution, operating more than 2 million vehicles throughout the world. Combined, these businesses – accounting for $25.9 billion in revenue in fiscal year 2019 – include the Car Sales, Truck Rental, CarShare, Commute vanpooling, Zimride, Exotic Car Collection, Car Club (U.K.) and Flex-E-Rent (U.K.) services, all marketed under the Enterprise brand name. The annual revenues of Enterprise Holdings – one of America’s largest private companies – and Enterprise Fleet Management rank near the top of the global travel industry, exceeding many airlines and most cruise lines, hotels, tour operators, and online travel agencies. Langhorst began her career with Enterprise in 1988 as a Corporate Accountant at the company’s headquarters in St. Louis. In 1990, she was promoted to Business Management Analyst and in 1992 moved to Treasury, where she was responsible for day-to-day cash management and debt covenant compliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Aktueller Stand Des Car-Sharing in Europa
    more options for energy efficient mobility through Car-Sharing Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 Juni 2010 Bundesverband CarSharing e. V. Willi Loose momo Car-Sharing More options for energy efficient mobility through Car-Sharing Grant agreement No.: IEE/07/696/SI2.499387 Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 I Inhaltsverzeichnis 0. Zusammenfassung 1 1. Einleitung und Übersicht 7 1.1 Das Projekt momo Car-Sharing 7 1.2 Inhalt des Berichts 9 2. Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa 11 2.1 Überblick 11 2.2 Stand des Car-Sharing in europäischen Ländern 13 2.2.1 Belgien 13 2.2.2 Dänemark 14 2.2.3 Deutschland 14 2.2.4 Finnland 15 2.2.5 Frankreich 16 2.2.6 Großbritannien 16 2.2.7 Irland 17 2.2.8 Italien 18 2.2.9 Niederlande 19 2.2.10 Österreich 19 2.2.11 Portugal 19 2.2.12 Schweden 20 2.2.13 Schweiz 20 2.2.14 Spanien 21 2.3 Vergleichende Einschätzung des Car-Sharing-Wachstums 21 3. Befragung der europäischen Car-Sharing-Anbieter 24 3.1 Methodik der Befragung 24 3.2 Rücklauf der Fragebögen 25 3.3 Ausgewählte Befragungsergebnisse 27 3.3.1 Erhebungsergebnisse zur Car-Sharing-Nutzung 27 3.3.2 Erhebungsergebnisse zu Kooperationen der Car-Sharing-Anbieter 39 3.3.3 Erhebungsergebnisse zur politischen Unterstützung 50 Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 II 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 CMC CHA Report FINAL.Pdf
    1 Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Current Environment ............................................................................................................................... 4 2021 RVCHA Key Findings ........................................................................................................................ 5 Mental Health ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Socioeconomic Factors ........................................................................................................................ 6 Primary Care ........................................................................................................................................ 6 COVID-19 ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Board Adoption ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Disclaimer .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................... 8 Project Management Team ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Organizing for Economic Development: Lessons from Leading Life Sciences Regions
    Organizing for Economic Development: Lessons from Leading Life Sciences Regions Prepared for: Detroit Renaissance July 31, 2007 Submitted by: 2610 N. Key Boulevard PO Box 100127 Arlington, VA 22201 Arlington, VA 22210 703-725-6575 703-522-4980 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary............................................................................................................ 1 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 5 Case Profile: Baltimore-Washington, DC......................................................................... 11 Case Profile: Boston ......................................................................................................... 16 Case Profile: Cleveland..................................................................................................... 22 Case Profile: Los Angeles................................................................................................. 27 Case Profile: New York.................................................................................................... 31 Case Profile: Philadelphia................................................................................................. 37 Case Profile: Raleigh-Durham.......................................................................................... 43 Case Profile: San Diego.................................................................................................... 50 Case Profile: San Francisco .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Europcar Mobility Group S.A. Consolidated Financial Statements
    Europcar Mobility Group S.A. Consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2019 1 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME ........................................................................................................................ 4 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ...................................................................................... 5 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY ..................................................................................................7 CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT ........................................................................................................................ 9 GENERAL OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 11 GENERAL INFORMATION ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 MAIN EVENTS OF THE PERIOD ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 12 CHANGES IN SCOPE OF CONSOLIDATION
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew C. Taylor Executive Chairman Enterprise Holdings Inc
    Andrew C. Taylor Executive Chairman Enterprise Holdings Inc. Andrew Taylor, who became involved in the automotive business more than 50 years ago, currently serves as Executive Chairman of Enterprise Holdings Inc., the privately held business founded in 1957 by his father, Jack Taylor. Enterprise Holdings operates – through an integrated global network of independent regional subsidiaries and franchises – the Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Alamo Rent A Car and National Car Rental brands, as well as more than 10,000 fully staffed neighborhood and airport locations in 100 countries and territories. Enterprise Holdings is the largest car rental company in the world, as measured by revenue and fleet. In addition, Enterprise Holdings is the most comprehensive service provider and only investment-grade company in the U.S. car rental industry. The company and its affiliate Enterprise Fleet Management together offer a total transportation solution, operating more than 2 million vehicles throughout the world. Combined, these businesses – accounting for $25.9 billion in revenue in fiscal year 2019 – include the Car Sales, Truck Rental, CarShare, Commute vanpooling, Zimride, Exotic Car Collection, Subscribe with Enterprise, Car Club (U.K.) and Flex-E-Rent (U.K.) services, all marketed under the Enterprise brand name. The annual revenues of Enterprise Holdings – one of America’s largest private companies – and Enterprise Fleet Management rank near the top of the global travel industry, exceeding many airlines and most cruise lines, hotels, tour operators, and online travel agencies. Taylor joined Enterprise at the age of 16 in one of the original St. Louis offices. He began his career by washing cars during summer and holiday vacations and learning the business from the ground up.
    [Show full text]
  • Zipcar and Zimride Join Forces on College Campuses
    Innovation > Mobility & Transport > Zipcar and Zimride join forces on college campuses ZIPCAR AND ZIMRIDE JOIN FORCES ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES MOBILITY & TRANSPORT There are few things more exciting to us here at Springwise than seeing good ideas come together, and that’s exactly what we had occasion to spot earlier this month. Zipcar—the car-sharing innovator we’ve covered on numerous occasions already—just announced a partnership with Zimride —also no stranger to our pages—to bring an integrated ride-sharing system to college and university campuses. Debuting a few weeks ago at Stanford University, the integrated service combines Zipcar’s car-sharing program with Zimride’s Facebook-based carpool matching system to make it easier for college students, faculty and staff to seek, offer and share rides. Zipcar already operates car-sharing programs at more than 120 US colleges and universities. To share a ride, members reserving a car can now automatically post the date, time and destination of their trip to the Zimride campus community online. Zimride’s route-matching algorithm takes over from there, finding and notifying users looking for such a ride. Zimride members, meanwhile, can now find a local Zipcar to share through a customized campus Zimride website or Facebook application, making it possible for them to carpool even if they don’t own a car. Zipcar CEO Scott Griffith explains: “We chose to partner with Zimride because their innovative and scalable platform is a great foundation for building a national network of rides. Zipcar fills the car ownership gap for the Zimride model, since people most likely to ride-share are those that are least likely to own a car.” The two companies aim to roll out the integrated service to many more campuses in the coming months.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving Lives and Saving Money
    Saving Lives and Saving Money The Case for Harm Reduction in Kanawha County, WV Saving Lives and Saving Money: The Case for Harm Reduction in Kanawha County, WV By Jill Kriesky, PhD TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary . 2 Introduction . 5 Part I: Substance Use Disorders at the National, State, and Local Levels . 7 The “Lay of the Land” Nationally . 7 Why Is West Virginia Central to the Drug Epidemic Story? . 10 Why Focus on Kanawha County? . 11 Part II: Calculations of Damages from Substance Use Disorders in West Virginia and Kanawha County . 14 Calculating the Economic Damages of Fatal Overdoses . 14 Calculating the Economic Costs of Non-Fatal Substance Use . 15 Total Economic Damages in West Virginia and Kanawha County . 15 Part III: Additional Health and Social Impacts, Additional Costs . 17 Why We Look Beyond the Current Estimations . 17 The Children of People with SUDs . 18 Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) . 18 Learning Disabilities . 19 Foster Care . 19 Long-Term Health Considerations of People with SUDs . 20 Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) . 21 Hepatitis C (HCV) . 22 Hepatitis B (HBV) . 23 Infective Endocarditis (IE) . 24 Part IV: Harm Reduction: How to Reduce Drug Epidemic Costs . 26 Dollars Saved by Lives Saved through Harm Reduction . 27 Naloxone Distribution . 27 Syringe Services Programs (SSPs) . 28 Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) . 29 Supervised Consumption Facilities (SCFs) . 30 Dollars Saved by Reductions in Crime and Other Societal Impacts . 31 Part V: Recommendations . 33 Better Data Tracking and Distribution . 33 Wide Distribution of Harm Reduction Programs . 34 Policies to Enhance Residents’ Health and Well-Being . .. 34 Appendix . 36 Acknowledgements .
    [Show full text]
  • Gfors Dutch National Report
    G-fors Dutch national report Strategic Environmental Assessment Particulate matter Frans Coenen Bas Denters Pieter-Jan Klok Julia Kotzebue University of Twente 2008 Part 1: The Dutch SEA case Frans Coenen Julia Kotzebue Center for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy University of Twente The Netherlands Content 0 Strategic Environmental Assessments in the Netherlands 1 1 Context and Conditions 3 1.1 Introduction 3 1.2 Case History 5 2 The Action Arena 12 2.1 Involved Actors: Holders – their resources and Roles 12 2.2 Absent Actors 20 2.3 Observed Modes of Interaction 20 2.4 Discourses 21 3 Identifying Case Specific Governance Arrangements 22 3.1 Governance Modes/Governance Arrangements 22 3.2 Rules in Use/Institutional Content 24 3.3 Changes 25 4 Identification of the Case Specific Knowledge Scapes 25 4.1 Dominant Knowledge Forms: Content/Claims of Knowledge Forms 25 4.2 Knowledge Holders 28 4.3 Excluded/Silent Knowledge 29 4.4 Relevance of Reflective Knowledge 30 5 Identification of Interfaces/Interaction between Knowledge and Governance Arrangements 31 5.1 Synergies/Contradictions between Governance Arrangements and Knowledge Forms 32 5.2 Relationship between Modes of Interaction and Knowledge Forms 33 5.3 Relationship between Governance Arrangements, Knowledge Forms and Learning processes 33 6 Identifying ‘Governance for Sustainability’ 33 6.1 Assessing Sustainable Development in the Selected Case 33 6.2 Assessing the Legitimacy of Policy-making in the Selected Case 34 6.3 Synergies/Contradictions between Governance Arrangements and Knowledge Forms on the one side and Sustainability and Legitimate Policy-Making on the other side 35 References 36 Attachment 38 0.
    [Show full text]
  • A Proposal for Modernizing Labor Laws for Twenty-First-Century Work: the “Independent Worker”
    DISCUSSION PAPER 2015-10 | DECEMBER 2015 A Proposal for Modernizing Labor Laws for Twenty-First-Century Work: The “Independent Worker” Seth D. Harris and Alan B. Krueger The Hamilton Project • Brookings 1 MISSION STATEMENT The Hamilton Project seeks to advance America’s promise of opportunity, prosperity, and growth. We believe that today’s increasingly competitive global economy demands public policy ideas commensurate with the challenges of the 21st Century. The Project’s economic strategy reflects a judgment that long-term prosperity is best achieved by fostering economic growth and broad participation in that growth, by enhancing individual economic security, and by embracing a role for effective government in making needed public investments. Our strategy calls for combining public investment, a secure social safety net, and fiscal discipline. In that framework, the Project puts forward innovative proposals from leading economic thinkers — based on credible evidence and experience, not ideology or doctrine — to introduce new and effective policy options into the national debate. The Project is named after Alexander Hamilton, the nation’s first Treasury Secretary, who laid the foundation for the modern American economy. Hamilton stood for sound fiscal policy, believed that broad-based opportunity for advancement would drive American economic growth, and recognized that “prudent aids and encouragements on the part of government” are necessary to enhance and guide market forces. The guiding principles of the Project remain consistent with these views. 2 Informing Students about Their College Options: A Proposal for Broadening the Expanding College Opportunities Project A Proposal for Modernizing Labor Laws for Twenty-First-Century Work: The “Independent Worker” Seth D.
    [Show full text]