National Forest Stewardship Standard of Russian Federation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Forest Stewardship Standard of Russian Federation ® Forest Stewardship Council The FSC National Forest Stewardship Standard of Russian Federation FSC International Center gGmbH · ic.fsc.org · FSC® F000100 Adenauerallee 134 · 53113 Bonn · Germany T +49 (0) 228 367 66 0 · F +49 (0) 228 367 66 65 Geschäftsführer | Directors: Dr. Hans-Joachim Droste and/und Stefan Salvador Handelsregister | Commercial Register: Bonn HRB12589 ® Forest Stewardship Council Photo credit From left to right: Photo 1: Wild strawberry in Arhangelsk region (FSC Russia) Photo 2: Forestry worker in the Komi Republic (FSC Russia) Photo 3: FSC certified logs in Karelia region (FSC Russia) NOTE ON THIS ENGLISH VERSION: This is the official version of the National Forest Stewardship Standard that is approved by FSC International, and it is available at ic.fsc.org. Any translation of this version is not an official translation approved by FSC International. If there is any conflict or inconsistency between the approved English version and any translated version, the English version shall prevail. FSC-STD-RUS-02-2020 EN THE FSC NATIONAL FOREST STEWARDSHIP STANDARD OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION – 2 of 151 – ® Forest Stewardship Council Title The FSC National Forest Stewardship Standard of Russian Federation Document reference code FSC-STD-RUS-02-2020 EN Status Approved National Natural forests and plantations Scope All organization types SLIMFs included NTFPs included Submission date 4 December 2018 Approval date 10 August 2020 Approval body Policy and Standards Committee Publication date 22 September 2020 Effective date 22 March 2021 Transition period 12 months from the effective date Validity period Five years from effective date or until revised, replaced or withdrawn Country contact Nikolay Shmatkov, Director FSC Russia [email protected] FSC International Center - Performance and Standards Unit - Adenauerallee 134 FSC Performance and 53113 Bonn, Germany Standards Unit contact +49-(0)228-36766-0 +49-(0)228-36766-65 [email protected] © 2020 Forest Stewardship Council, A.C. All rights reserved. FSC®F000100 No part of this work covered by the publisher’s copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, recording taping, or information retrieval systems) without the written permission of the publisher. The Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC) is an independent, not for profit, non-government organization established to support environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. FSC’s vision is that the true value of forests is recognized and fully incorporated into society worldwide. FSC is the leading catalyst and defining force for improved forest management and market transformation, shifting the global forest trend toward sustainable use, conservation, restoration, and respect for all. FSC-STD-RUS-02-2020 EN THE FSC NATIONAL FOREST STEWARDSHIP STANDARD OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION – 3 of 151 – ® Forest Stewardship Council Table of content 1. Preface .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1. Descriptive statement of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) .................................... 5 1.2. Descriptive statement of the National Office / Standard Development Group ................ 5 2. Preamble ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Purpose of the standard .................................................................................................. 6 2.2. Scope of the standard ..................................................................................................... 7 2.3. Process of the standard development ............................................................................ 7 3. Version of the standard ....................................................................................................... 8 4. Context ................................................................................................................................. 9 4.1. Note on applicability extent of the standard’s requirements ........................................... 9 5. References ........................................................................................................................... 9 6. Structure of the standard, the use of indicators and wording ...................................... 10 7. Procedural character of some principles and criteria .................................................... 11 8. Translation .......................................................................................................................... 12 9. Scale Intensity and Risk (SIR) .......................................................................................... 12 10. Basic differences when compared with the previous version .................................... 12 11. Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................... 14 12. List of abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 17 13. Principles, criteria and national indicators ................................................................... 18 14. Annexes to the Forest Stewardship Standard .............................................................. 64 Annex A. Minimum list of applicable laws: Russian Internationally-ratified treaties, conventions and agreements and Federation regulations .................................... 64 Annex B1. Applicable Articles of the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and ILO Convention 169 ......................................................................... 78 Annex B2 (new). Indigenous Peoples .................................................................................. 82 Annex B3 (new). Customary Rights (Reference Materials) ................................................. 83 Annex B4 (new). FPIC.......................................................................................................... 84 Annex C (new). Types of habitat features* being identified at harvest areas during timber harvesting operations and measures for their protection* .................................... 89 Annex D1. High Conservation Values .................................................................................. 93 Annex D2. Methodological Approaches and Recommendations for Zoning Intact Forest Landscapes and Tracts in the Southern Russian Far East................................. 121 Annex D3. Methodological Approaches and Recommendations for Zoning Intact Forest Landscapes in the Siberian Federal District ....................................................... 123 Annex E. Application of the concept of scale, intensity and risk (SIR) in Criteria* 6.2 and 6.3 ............................................................................................................................ 126 15. Glossary of terms .......................................................................................................... 130 FSC-STD-RUS-02-2020 EN THE FSC NATIONAL FOREST STEWARDSHIP STANDARD OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION – 4 of 151 – ® Forest Stewardship Council 1. Preface 1.1. Descriptive statement of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) The Forest Stewardship Council A.C. (FSC) was established in 1993, as a follow-up to the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (the Earth Summit at Rio de Janeiro, 1992) with the mission to promote environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world’s forests. Environmentally appropriate forest management ensures that the production of timber, non- timber products and ecosystem services maintains the forest’s biodiversity, productivity, and ecological processes. Socially beneficial forest management helps both local people and society at large to enjoy long term benefits and also provides strong incentives to local people to sustain the forest resources and adhere to long-term management plans. Economically viable forest management means that forest operations are structured and managed so as to be sufficiently profitable, without generating financial profit at the expense of the forest resource, the ecosystem, or affected communities. The tension between the need to generate adequate financial returns and the principles of responsible forest operations can be reduced through efforts to market the full range of forest products and services for their best value (FSC A.C. By-Laws, ratified, September 1994; last revision in June 2011). FSC is an international organization that provides a system for voluntary accreditation and independent third-party certification. This system allows certificate holders to market their products and services as the result of environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial and economically viable forest management. FSC also sets standards for the development and approval of FSC Stewardship Standards which are based on the FSC Principles and Criteria. In addition, FSC sets standards for the accreditation of Conformity Assessment Bodies (also known as Certification Bodies) that certify compliance with FSC’s standards. Based on these standards, FSC provides a system for certification for organizations seeking to market their products as FSC certified. 1.2. Descriptive statement of the National
Recommended publications
  • The Government of Russian Federation
    16/01/2017 RAP/RCha/RUS/6(2017) EUROPEAN SOCIAL CHARTER 6th National Report on the implementation of the European Social Charter submitted by THE GOVERNMENT OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION Articles 3, 11, 12 and 14 for the period 01/01/2012 - 31/12/2015 Report registered by the Secretariat on 16 January 2017 CYCLE 2017 Report on the implementation of European Social Charter (revised) Articles 3, 11, 12, 14. Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of the Russian Federation. 2016. Paragraph 1 Article 3. With a view to ensuring the effective exercise of the right to safe and healthy working conditions, the Parties undertake, in consultation with employers' and workers' organization: to formulate, implement and periodically review a coherent national policy on occupational safety, occupational health and the working environment. The primary aim of this policy shall be to improve occupational safety and health and to prevent accidents and injury to health arising out of, linked with or occurring in the course of work, particularly by minimizing the causes of hazards inherent in the working environment; During the report period 2010-2014 the realization of state policy in the sphere of occupational safety and health based on provisions of the Constitution, Labor Code of the Russian Federation, Federal Law № 52-FZ of 30.03.1999 "On the sanitary and epidemiological wellbeing of the population", Federal Law № 116-FZ 21.07.1997 "On industrial safety of dangerous production facilities", Federal law № 426-FZ 28.12.2013 "On special assessment of working conditions", the orders of the President and Government of the Russian Federation and it was implemented in accordance with the concept of demographic policy of the Russian Federation for the period till 2025 and other regulatory documents of the President and Government of the Russian Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • WT/TPR/S/345/Rev.1 6 December 2016 (16
    WT/TPR/S/345/Rev.1 6 December 2016 (16-6657) Page: 1/173 Trade Policy Review Body TRADE POLICY REVIEW REPORT BY THE SECRETARIAT RUSSIAN FEDERATION Revision This report, prepared for the first Trade Policy Review of the Russian Federation, has been drawn up by the WTO Secretariat on its own responsibility. The Secretariat has, as required by the Agreement establishing the Trade Policy Review Mechanism (Annex 3 of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization), sought clarification from the Russian Federation on its trade policies and practices. Any technical questions arising from this report may be addressed to Mr. John Finn (Tel: 022 739 5081), Mr. Ricardo Barba (Tel: 022 739 5088), Mr. Peter Milthorp (Tel: 022 739 5016) and Mr. Rosen Marinov (Tel: 022 739 6391). Document WT/TPR/G/345 contains the policy statement submitted by the Russian Federation. Note: This report was drafted in English. WT/TPR/S/345/Rev.1 • Russian Federation - 2 - CONTENTS SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 8 1 ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................ 13 1.1 Main Features of the Economy .....................................................................................13 1.2 Recent Economic Developments ...................................................................................14 1.3 Trade and Investment Performance ................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Legal Provisions
    Russia Legal Provisions Compiled by: SBH Russia Moscow, January 2018 GENERAL REMARKS Like Switzerland, the Russian Federation has three levels of government authority: the federal State, the so-called “subjects of the Federation” (republics, regions, etc.), and the municipalities (local self- government). The Russian Federation has 85 “subjects” including the cities of Moscow, Saint Petersburg and Sevastopol as cities of national importance (hereafter “Regions”) and approximately 22,000 municipalities. The legislation of the Russian Federation consists of the Constitution (adopted in 1993), federal laws and federal constitutional laws, presidential decrees, government resolutions and other regulatory acts. Laws must respect the Constitution. Presidential decrees, government resolutions and regulatory acts must be in conformity with federal laws. The Regions can enact legislation in those areas which are not within the exclusive authority of the federal State. They can also adopt regulatory acts on matters delegated by federal law. Regional legislation must comply with federal law. International treaties have precedence over national law. At the federal level laws are adopted by the Parliament (State Duma and Federation Council), presidential decrees and government resolutions by the President, respectively the Government. Other regulatory acts can be issued by ministries and various government agencies. Switzerland Global Enterprise – Legal Provisions 1/48 As a general rule laws and regulatory acts must be published. Since November 10, 2011, legislation is published (in Russian only) through the internet portal www.pravo.gov.ru and in “Rossiyskaya Gazeta” (www.rg.ru/doc). Most regulations adopted by ministries and agencies of the executive branch must be registered with the Ministry of Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018 ABOUT THIS REPORT 02
    AnnuAl RepoRt 2018 ABOUT THIS REPORT 02 1 / 2 ABOUT THIS REPORT Approach to the Report Boundaries of the Report Approval of the Report This Annual Report of Sberbank of Russia ¹ for 2018 (the “Report”) The financial data are presented in the Report Information on sustainable development is consoli- This Report received preliminary approv- in accordance with the IFRS consolidated financial dated by the major participants of the Group, which al by the Supervisory Board of Sberbank includes the performance results of Sberbank and its subsidiaries ² statements, unless otherwise specified in the text of have a significant impact on their regions of pres- (Minutes No. 11 of April 16, 2019). for the reporting period from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018. the Report. ence, and Sberbank Corporate University. The reliability of the data in the Report was con- Operational data are presented for PJSC Sberbank firmed by the Audit Committee of Sberbank. unless otherwise specified in the text of the Report. The Report has been prepared in accordance with In addition, the contents of the Report The Report was approved by the Annual General the legislation of the Russian Federation, including: comply with the following documents: Shareholder Meeting of Sberbank as of May 24, 2019 (Minutes No 32 as of May 29, 2019). ♦ Federal Law No. 39-FZ “On the Securities ♦ Requirements of the Moscow Stock The term “Group” as used in the sections “People: Nurturing New Skills in Effective Teams” Market” dated April 22,1996; Exchange on the preparation of annu- and “Impact on Society” includes Sberbank Corporate University and the following: al reports by joint stock companies; ♦ Federal Law No.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 May 18, 2021 PROGRAMME OF
    May 18, 2021 PROGRAMME OF THE INDEPENDENT DIALOGUE in Support of the 2021 Food Systems Summit: «Different Routes - Similar Goals» Link for online participants: Connect to the Zoom Conference https://eurasia-assembly.zoom.us/j/84891899668 Conference ID: 848 9189 9668 Access code: 560798 Offline address: Moscow, Krasnopresnenskaya embankment, 12, World Trade Centre, Premier Hall of the Crown Plaza Moscow hotel Date and time: Tuesday, May 18, 2021, 14: 30-18.00 GMT + 3 Preamble to the Independent Dialogue: In November 2021, at the initiative of the UN Secretary General, the 2021 Food Systems Summit will take place to call for bold new actions to change the way the world produces and consumes food, reduce diet-related diseases, make the planet healthier and make progress in the implementation of all 17 Sustainable Development Goals. The International Union of Non-Governmental Organizations «Eurasian Peoples' Assembly» invites all interested non-governmental and government organizations to take part in this significant event taking a seat at the table of the Independent Dialogue «Different routes, similar goals» in support of the Food Systems Summit 2021 on May 18, 2021. Independent dialogue is an integral part of the events of the Global Food Forum - 2021, which develops the theme of the Summit. Time limit for speeches - up to 10 minutes Time limit for debates - up to 5 minutes Working language: Russian/English/French (simultaneous translation) Discussion format: independent dialogue, free exchange of views MODERATOR: MS. YULIA PETROVA Professor, Ph.D. in Economics, Deputy Head of the General Secretariat for International Cooperation of the Eurasian Peoples' Assembly MR.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank of Russia Annual Report for 2019
    ANNUAL REPORT 2019 MOSCOW Bank of Russia Annual Report for 2019 Approved by the Bank of Russia Board of Directors on 13 May 2020 Published by Business News Agency PRIME 12 Neglinnaya Street, Moscow 107016 Official website of the Bank of Russia: www.cbr.ru Printed by ‘Tipografiya ‘Vozrojdenie’ © The Central Bank of the Russian Federation, 2020 Number of copies — 350. Order No. 1191 Bank of Russia Annual Report 2 for 2019 Contents OPENING REMARKS BY THE GOVERNOR OF THE BANK OF RUSSIA 9 SUMMARY 11 THE STATE OF THE ECONOMY 1 OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 21 1.1. The macroeconomic situation ....................................................................................................... 25 1.1.1. External economic conditions ........................................................................................... 25 1.1.2. Inflation and conomice activity .........................................................................................30 1.1.2.1. Production activity ...............................................................................................30 1.1.2.2. Domestic demand and labour market ................................................................ 33 1.1.2.3. Inflation ................................................................................................................... 35 1.1.3. Fiscal policy, government finance and domestic government debt ............................ 38 1.1.3.1. Federal budget ......................................................................................................40
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Terminal Evaluation Phase out of Hcfcs and Promotion
    INDEPENDENT EVALUATION DIVISION OFFICE OF EVALUATION AND INTERNAL OVERSIGHT Independent Terminal Evaluation Phase out of HCFCs and promotion of HFC-free energy efficient refrigeration and air- conditioning systems in the Russian Federation through technology transfer UNIDO Project ID.: 105324 GEF Project ID.: 3541 INDEPENDENT EVALUATION DIVISION OFFICE OF EVALUATION AND INTERNAL OVERSIGHT Independent Terminal Evaluation Phase out of HCFCs and promotion of HFC-free energy efficient refrigeration and air-conditioning systems in the Russian Federation through technology transfer UNIDO Project ID.: 105324 GEF Project No.: 3541 Vienna, 2018 Distr. GENERAL ODG/EIO/IED/18/R.14 December 2018 Original: English This evaluation was managed by the responsible UNIDO Project Manager with quality assurance by the Independent Evaluation Division This document has not been formally edited. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Mention of company names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of UNIDO. The views and opinions of the team do not necessarily reflect the views of the Governments and of UNIDO. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Military R&D Infrastructure
    Russia’s Military R&D Infrastructure A Primer Johan Engvall FOI-R--5124--SE April 2021 Johan Engvall Russia’s Military R&D Infrastructure A Primer FOI-R--5124--SE Title Russia’s Military R&D Infrastructure – A Primer Titel Rysslands militära FoU-infrastruktur – en primer Report no FOI-R--5124--SE Month April Year 2021 Pages 53 ISSN 1650-1942 Customer Ministry of Defence Forskningsområde Säkerhetspolitik FoT-område Inget FoT-område Project no A12111 Approved by Malek Finn Khan Ansvarig avdelning Försvarsanalys Cover: Students of the military innovative technopolis Era. 22 November 2018. Kommersant/TT Nyhetsbyrån. This work is protected by the Swedish Act on Copyright in Literary and Artistic Works (1960:729). Citation is permitted in accordance with article 22 in said act. Any form of use that goes beyond what is permitted by Swedish copyright law, requires the written permission of FOI. 2 (53) FOI-R--5124--SE Sammanfattning Rysslands militära FoU-infrastruktur består av tre typer av organisationer med rötter i Sovjettiden – forskningsinstitut, konstruktionsbyråer och vetenskapliga produktionsassociationer. Forskningsinstituten sysslar i huvudsak med att utveckla forskningsidéer för militär tillämpning. Konstruktionsbyråerna utvecklar och testar prototyper. Vetenskapliga produktionsassociationer kombinerar FoU- verksamhet med egen tillverkningskapacitet. Sammantaget består försvars- industrins FoU-komponent av nästan 600 organisationer. Av dessa är cirka 300 forskningsinstitut, knappt 130 konstruktionsbyråer och ungefär 170 vetenskapliga produktionsassociationer. Geografiskt är FoU-organisationerna koncentrerade till större städer. I och omkring Moskva finns nästan hälften av alla FoU-institut, medan St. Petersburg har en femtedel av instituten. Den militära FoU-strukturen kan indelas i sju huvud- sakliga branscher: flyg, rymdteknologi, skeppsbyggnad, konventionella vapen, radioelektronik och kommunikationssystem, ammunition och speciella kemikalier samt kärnteknik.
    [Show full text]
  • Skoltech Annual Report 2019
    Annual Report Contents FOREWORD 002 YEAR IN NUMBERS 005 01 / FOCUS & GOVERNANCE 008 Human Capital 010 Institutional Governance & Development 030 Strategic Communications 038 02 / ACADEMIC & TECHNOLOGY EXCELLENCE 058 Teaching & Learning 062 Research 072 Integrating Innovation 088 03 / VALUE GENERATION 094 Industry Funded Research 096 New Enterprises & Technology Licensing 100 Professional Training & Advisory Services 102 04 / OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT 108 GLOSSARY 112 1 It is my pleasure and a privilege to present international high-tech companies, research the annual report. Established in 2011 with and innovation agencies, in total of 1.6 bln the vision of being a world class university, rubles – 45% growth compared to 2018. Skoltech proudly marks 2019 as the year of Over 2 bln rubles of sponsored research success. funding have been confirmed for 2020 2019 was the first year in the new and beyond. Long-term investments have campus. Awarded at UNESCO headquarters been secured by Skoltech joint laboratories with the Prix Versailles as the world's best with Oerlikon, Gazprom Neft, Huawei, campus in 2019, it is without doubt an Sberbank, and Topcon. Also, Sberbank joined architectural masterpiece. At the same time, Skoltech as a founder. I am confident that the most important aspect of the campus this will bring new technological tasks and is its unique atmosphere and infrastructure opportunities for student internships and which inspire and enable our commitment for graduates’ employment. excellence. Staffed with top-notch professionals, the The high research performance of the Center of the Internet of Things contributes faculty, researchers, engineers, and students to the National Technology Initiative. The has put Skoltech into the top-100 Nature 5G Open Radio Access Network Center, Index 2019 Young Universities.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Annual Report Contents PRESIDENT’S FOREWORD 004 SKOLTECH IN BRIEF 006 01 / FOCUS AND GOVERNANCE 012 Human Capital 014 Institutional Development 030 Strategic Communication 040 02 / ACADEMIC & TECHNOLOGY EXCELLENCE 048 Teaching & Learning 053 Research Excellence 061 Integrating Innovation 104 03 / VALUE GENERATION 112 Industry Funded Research 114 New Enterprises & Technology Licensing 118 Professional Training 122 Advisory Services 124 04 / CAMPUS 126 05 / OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT 132 GLOSSARY 135 3 I am pleased to introduce the Annual are used in the aerospace industry, was Report 2018, the third year of my successfully developed and delivered to Presidency. ISS Reshetnev, allowing for the production The speed and scale of development of materials that were previously imported during 2015 – 2018 required commitment to Russia. The Enhanced Oil Recovery and efforts from our faculty, researchers, Lab is secured with R&D contracts engineers, students, alumni, management by largest companies such as Lukoil, and Trustees – all of whom who made Gazpromneft, Zarubezhneft, Rosneft, Total, Skoltech what it is today. and Schlumberger for a year ahead. The We are a fully operational international specialists of the Center for Energy Science university, attracting for permanent jobs and Technology have set-up a production line specialists with multi-year experience at of cathode materials based on lithium-iron- the world leading universities and high- phosphate сompounds, outdoing the world’s tech companies. We have established best counterparts by 8-10 %. The materials multidisciplinary teams working in the areas will serve for advanced batteries of medium of global science & technology agenda – and large-scale capacities. The first prototypes artificial intelligence, life sciences and of lithium-ion batteries of small capacity health, agrotechnologies, photonics & (for smartphones) have been designed.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Railways” Russian Railways Social Report 2010
    Corporate Social Report 2010, JSCo “Russian Railways” _Russian Railways Social Report 2010 Contents Introduction 03 1. General Information about the Report 6 2. Scope and Limits of the Report 6 3. Regulatory and Methodological Framework Used for the Preparation of the Report 6 4. The Methods Used for the Preparation of the Corporate Social Report 6 List of Acronyms and Terms Used in the Report 9 04 Section 1. General characteristics of JSCo “RZD” 12 1.1. General characteristics of JSCo “RZD” 13 1.2. JSCo “RZD” Ownership Structure 16 01 1.3. JSCo “RZD” Corporate Style 17 1.4. Mission and scale of business 18 1.5. Participation of the Company in International Organizations and International Activities 22 1.6. Structural Reform Program for Railway Sector 25 1.7. Public Evaluation of JSCo “RZD”Performance 30 05 Section 2. Strategic Goals of the Company Concerning in Sustainable Development. Key Risks and Opportunities in Social Responsibility 32 02 2.1. Role of JSCo “RZD” for Sustainable Development 33 2.2. Strategic Goals of the Company for Sustainable Development 34 2.3. Key Focus Areas of JSCo “RZD” for Social Responsibility 36 2.4. Social Responsibility Key Risks and Opportunities 40 2_ _Russian Railways Social Report 2010 Section 3. Stakeholders Interaction 42 3.1. Review of Concerned Parties 43 03 3.2. Forms of Stakeholders Interaction 52 Section 4. Economic Efficiency 54 4.1. Economical Policy of JSCo “RZD” and Its Implementation Mechanisms 55 4.2. JSCo “RZD” Economic Efficiency Management System 56 04 4.2.1. Risks and Opportunities in Economical Context 56 4.3.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL OVERVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE on the IMPLEMENTATION of the MEDICRIME CONVENTION Answers of the Russian Federation
    The MEDICRIME Convention La Convention MÉDICRIME COURTESY TRANSLATION GENERAL OVERVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MEDICRIME CONVENTION Answers of the Russian Federation As adopted by the Bureau of the MEDICRIME Committee on 7 July 2020 Replies should be addressed to the MEDICRIME Committee Secretariat by 23 September 2020 ([email protected]) F - 67075 Strasbourg Cedex | [email protected] | Tel: +33 3 88 41 2000 | www.coe.int/medicrime I. INTRODUCTION II. PRELIMINARY REMARKS Public authorities/institutions which responsible for collecting answers to the questions of this questionnaire: Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare (Roszdravnadzor) Public authorities/institutions which contribute to these answers: • The Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Minzdrav of Russia) • Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare (Roszdravnadzor) • The Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation • Federal Customs Service of Russia • Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation (MIA of Russia) III. GENERAL FRAMEWORK Question 1: Definitions a. Does the understanding of "medical product" under your internal law correspond to that set out in Article 4, letter (a), i.e. "medicinal products and medical devices"? There is no definition of the term "medical product" in Russian legislation. All Russian legal acts contain the terms "medicinal product" and / or "medical device. b. Does the understanding of “medicinal product” under your internal law correspond to that set out in Article 4, letter (b), i.e. “medicines for human and veterinary use which may be: i. any substance or combination of substances presented as having properties for treating or preventing disease in humans or animals; ii. any substance or combination of substances which may be used in or administered to human beings or animals either with a view to restoring, correcting or modifying physiological functions by exerting a pharmacological, immunological or metabolic action, or to making a medical diagnosis; iii.
    [Show full text]