Legal Metrology. Overview in Organization of Pattern Approval of Measurement and Control System

FGUP VNIIMS

25th January 2011 General information 2 sfguhsdfg Ministry of Industry and Trade

Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology (Rosstandart)

Interregional Russian Territorial Standards Directorates offices

Technical Scientific research committees institutes

Consumers of Organization metrological services metrological services Standardization and sustainable development 3 assurance

Strategic aim “Social and economic conception of development till 2020” - achievement the economic and social development level, which corresponds Russia as a leading world-power General information (ctd.) 4

One of the chief factor, which has an effect on competitiveness of production, works and services is their quality.

Standardization

Certification

Metrology Metrology Quality Safety assurance assurance Safety assurance

Transposability

Engineering measurements

It is necessary to follow both indispensable and suggested requirements of normative documents for safety ensuring and providing production of high quality or, where these do not exist – developing and approving them in full conformity with the Law. 5 Standardization and modernization of the economy 6 Renovation dynamics of national standards funds Investment in standard development 7

Abroad In Russia

Industry 85-90% 7-10% Small and medium-sized enterprises Professional organizations

Government 5-15% 90%

Consumers Trade unions 5% - Nongovernmental organizations

TASK – ACTIVE INVOLVING BUSINESS COMMUNITY TO STANDARD DEVELOPMENT Stimulation measures for industry to development and 8 application ofHNJJH national standards  Cost allocation of developing national standards to prime cost Time history of standards  Work attribution of standardization in the harmonisation level in the field of innovation activity to research and high potential development development fields (%)  Financing of developing national standards on private-public partnership principles 65 60 60  State support of production with “GOST R” 55 54 55 conformity mark 52 50 49 45 46  Allocation of companies with state 44 participation in investment programs and 40 allocation of standardization directed parts in 35 Federal Target Program 30 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014  Priority use of national standards for purchasing goods and services under state purchase contract and realization of state - moderate scenario expertise review of the projects - - optimistic scenario Transferal work preparations of international 9 documents Hierarchy of regulatory documents (Russia) 10

Federal laws «Concerning Technical Regulation» Essential requirements for production or «On assurance of measurement uniformity» connected with them design processes (including research), production, construction, assembling, alignment, Technical regulations exploitation, storage, transportation, realization and recycling, rules and forms of conformity assessment, rules of Federal RF Presidential RF Government indentification, requirements for terminology, laws Edicts Ordinance packing, marking or labels and principles of their application (Clause 7, paragraph 3 of the Law) Documents, providing compliance with the technical regulation requirements

National standards National standards which contains rules and methods of and (or) set of rules measuring research (testing), necessary for Technical (Clause 16, paragraph regulation use (Clause 7, paragraph 9 and Clause 11 of the 9 of the Law) Law)

Organization standards, which includes comercial, social, scientific organizations and also self-regulated organizations and association of legal entities (Clause 17 of the Law) 11 A list of normative legal documents

1. Order of the Ministry of Industry and Trade dated 3 September 2008, № 119; 2. Administrative provision accepted by the Ministry of Industry and Trade dated 15 February 2010, № 122; 3. Strategy of assurance of measurement uniformity up to 2015. Accepted by the Ministry of Industry and Trade dated 17 June 2009, № 529; 4. Russian Government Decree № 780, dated 02 October 2009; 5. Russian Government Decree № 879, dated 31 October 2009; 6. Russian Government Decree № 884, dated 02 November 2009; 7. Order of the Ministry of Industry and Trade dated 30 November 2009, № 1081; 8. Russian Government Decree № 1057, dated 22 December 2009; 9. Order of the Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology, dated 28 January 2010, № 181; 12 A list of normative legal documents (ctd.)

10. Order of the Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology, dated 29 January 2010, № 200; 11. Order of the Ministry of Industry and Trade dated 16 March 2010, № 196; 12. Order of the Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology, dated 26 March 2010, № 870; 13. Russian Government Decree № 250, dated 20 April 2010; 14. Order dated 26 February 2009, № 65; 15. Order dated 25 December 2009, № 184; 16. Statute of standard of unit values which is used in the sphere of government regulation of ensuring the unity of measurements. Accepted by the Russian Government Decree № 734, dated 23 September 2010; 17. Decree dated 20 August 2001, № 596. 13 Russian Mandatoryhdfgvjhd Regulatory basis

• djfFederal Law of Russian Federation 26 June 2008 №102-FZ «On assurance of measurement uniformity» (refer to http://www.vniims.ru/download/102-fz_eng.pdf)

• Article 9, section 1 “In the sphere of government regulation of assurance of measurement uniformity, verified means of measurement of an approved type shall be permitted for use…the mandatory requirements for means of measurement…shall also include requirements for their components and software…”

• Article 1, section 3 “The spheres of government regulation of assurance of measurement uniformity shall apply to measurements for: …6) in-process monitoring of compliance with industrial safety requirements for operation of a hazardous production facility specified by RF laws…” Recommendation for preparation, execution and 14 review of measuring instruments test materials for the purpose of type approval (according Measurement Procedure 3290-2010) • Recommendation for preparation, execution and review of measuring “Metrologicalinstruments and test technical materials specifications”. for the purpose of type approval Main characteristics (recommended) are pointed out in the clause: a) Measuring instrument metrological characteristics.

 characteristics for defining measurement results (without corrective actions),  transfer function (for measuring transducers and measurement devices),  measurement range, indication range (if it is not coincide with measurement range) or nominal value of measured value,  nominal or individual value of single-value or multivalue measure,  scale graduation value of measuring mean or multivalue measure,  mode of output code, code register length, minimum code position price unit (in case of measuring instrument deals with digital code readout). Recommendation (ctd.) 15

b) Measuring instrument accuracy characteristic.

 class of accuracy,  limits of maximum permissible basic / relative / absolute / conventional error (normalized value is pointed out in conventional error)  limits of permissible systematic component of basic error (if normalized),  limit of permissible value of measurement result mean-square deviation (if normalized),  limit of permissible variation of signal output (if normalized). c) Measuring instrument response characteristics to influence quantity.

 nominal influence function,  acceptable tolerance limits of influence quantity. Recommendation (ctd.) 16

d) Measuring instrument dynamic properties (if normalized).

transfer characteristic, unit-impulse response, amplitude-phase characteristic, transfer function, response time, time constant, damping rate, etc. e) Measuring instrument technical characteristics.

electrical power and power consumption, measuring instrument overall dimension and weight or its components, extreme service conditions of measuring instruments (pointed out, if they bring under regulation of normative documents), information about serviceability (mean life time, error-free running time etc.), safety parameters, including explosion protection. f) If any software exists, its identification data is mentioned in accordance with the table. 17 Recommendation (ctd.)

“Software identification and impact assessment to measuring instrument metrological characteristics” enclosed in the program if any software exists. This clause provides conformance inspection of the following software identification data:

1. software name, 2. software identification name, 3. software copy number (identification number), 4. software digital identifier (reconciliation total of executable code(for independent software products, reconciliation total is calculated only in the part of software which can influence on measuring instrument metrological characteristics)), 5. software digital identifier calculation algorithm, 6. safety protection level check against unpremeditated and premeditated alterations in accordance with Measurement Procedure 3286-2010 (A, B or C levels).

Software safety level against unpremeditated and premeditated alterations in accordance with Measurement Procedure 3286-2010 (A, B or C levels) is mentioned in the clause.

Exploitative documents for measuring instruments, which is the subject to import within Russian Federation, must be drawn in Russian. Control Systems Block Diagram 18 gjdgjsghu Measurement and Control System (MCS)

Integrated Control and Safety System (ICSS)

Safety Instrumented Control & Safety Systems Process Control System (SIS) for Packaged Modular Utilities System (PCS) Equipment/Drilling

Ticonox onPLC

Process Emergency Fire & Gas DELTA V Shutdown Shutdown System System (F&GS) System (PSD) (ESD)

Instrumentation and sensors

Instrumentation and sensors

Instrumentation and Instrumentation and Critical sensors Instrumentation and sensors sensors sensors General technique for SEM calibration by TGQ119 RECOMMENDATIONmeasures ON OBTAINING METROLOGY CERTIFICATE FOR SYSTEM • Aggregate uncertainty of measurements, during calibration of SEM, is a quantitative characteristic of accuracy. The main componentsCURRENT of this uncertaintyCERTIFICATION are: & TYPE APPROVALS PRACTICE FOR ALL ICS MEASURING 1) Uncertainty of actual value lengthINSTRUMENTS of period of TGQ1 measure by the results of the last calibration of this measure. 2) Uncertainty of measument ofCERTIFICATION length of period & SYSTEM of TGQ1 PROPOSED APPROVALS BY LOOPS OF THE measureSTRATEGY directly with the helpINTEGRATED of SEM CONTROLS calibration. & SAFETY FOR A-D SYSTEMS • BothTOPSIDES parameters are entered in calibration record; • Measurement uncertainty can be• Fire calculated safety in absolutes • Utilities and electrical units (m, micrometer, and nm) andinstallations in relative units (especially Systems: • Drilling and maintenance in percents). • Hydrocarbons – process controls • Remote communications and control equipment • Structural Monitoring 20 Key differencefgf

1. Current provision (according to requirements): •fgAll types of means of measurement on the platform must have certified copies of type approval certificates of the means of measurement. (Point 28.2 of Rostekhnadzor administrative procedure of state function licensure execution for application of technical devices certain type at hazardous industrial facilities, confirmed and registered by Russian Federation Justice Department №112 at 29.02.2008) 2. Future provision (RF Government Decree No. 250 dated April 20, 2010): As of January 1, 2012, all means of measurement, without exception, installed at a hazardous production facility shall require mandatory verification by government metrology centers (Regional Standardization, Metrology and Certification Center)). 3. Proposed provision for future projects: Only means of field instruments measurement incorporated in measurement loops that impact the safety of the control system and that require verification shall have type approval certificates. The obtaining of a certificate for a control system and the inclusion in the description of its type of the loops indicated above can sharply reduce the number of certificates for types of means of measurement used on the platform. 21 Basis of final listingара of Metrology loops

• пвапр1. Structure of measurement and control system by subsystems and loops, provided by the designers.

2. Assessment of critical instruments loops according to values of levels SIL1, SIL2 and SIL3, provided by the designers.

3. Expert review of all loops, identification of those having the greatest impact on safety, and classification of all loops identified according to functional attributes.

4. Developing a list of means of measurement incorporated in potentially “hazardous/Safety” loops. Analysis of list according to types of means of measurement and presence of approved type certificates. 22 Key Loop Checkingара Activities

1. Compiling a list of required loop verification procedures, and developing the • апапmissing procedures (based on results of the analysis per No. 3) - using Commissioning loop checking procedures.

2. Compiling lists of loops subject to checks (verification) and additionally checking offshore Object (on the territory RF) ; approval of the number of loops.

3. Performing checks (verification) for the selected & agreed with consumer,loops in Object. Conditions for a successful verification. The work is performed by the certifying organization with the participation of CSM (Center for Standardization and Metrology) and Consumer Commissioning acceptance testing team.

4. Documenting the loop (measurement channel) verification procedures as part of the overall Instrumentation and Control System Verification Procedure for entry into the State Metrology Register. 23 Future Use of Loopанра Verification Procedures

• впвп• The Verification procedures will be used according to Russian government order №250 dated 20.04.2010, CSM and VNIIMS during regular verification of the Instrumentation and Control System (for the loops entered in the Register).

• The remaining Instrumentation and Control System shall be calibrated by an accredited laboratory.

• Verification of registered loops as per verification procedures, according to the schedule, which was agreed with CSM. 24 Step-by-Stepкеоркег Road Map Plan “Scorecard” -- Metrology Approval for Large systems

Input data from Instrumentation Calibration Instrumentation customer index SIL Safety certificates certificates codes, standards (30 000)* and regulations

Index of Metrology expert review Index of loops Control Data base of Data base of instrumentation subject to legal Software codes, calibration subject to legal metrology description standards and certificates metrology regulations (3 000)*

Document development for testing and Test programs Verification Measurement procedures calibration (verification) procedures

Testing and experimental studies Loop checking /calibration (verification) Testing and calibration

KRISS Protocol (/Korea) Software certification Test reports

Supplemental Pattern description documentation Report Verification development procedures List of loops subject to List of instrumentation legal metrology subject to legal metrology Document development for Rosstandart

Obtaining verification certificate Obtaining unified metrology pattern for the system (VNIIMS) 2012 approval certificate for the system (Rosstandart) 2013 Obtaining approvals

Submission of documents to Rostekhnadzor for Submission of documentsPTU to Rostekhnadzor for PTU 25 MetrologyMetrology inin thethe field field of ofnanoindustry nanoindustry

Metrological projects directions for the development

Geometric Chemical Physical properties of properties and properties and nanoparts and structure of characteristics of nanomaterials nanomaterials nanomaterials Metrological assurance center and conformity 26 evaluation in nanoindustry

Development of the Center infrastructure Development of the Center infrastructure branch elements according direction elements in regions The Center regional divisions 27

Northwestern Federal District St. Petersburg

Central Federal District Moscow

Volga Federal District Nizhny Novgorod

Siberian Federal District Novosibirsk Far Eastern Federal District Khabarovsk Southern Federal District Rostov-on-Don

Urals Federal District Ekaterinburg Thank You for your attention!