Unified Facilities Criteria (Ufc) Design: Piers and Wharves

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Unified Facilities Criteria (Ufc) Design: Piers and Wharves UFC 4-152-01 28 July 2005 Change 1, 1 September 2012 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) DESIGN: PIERS AND WHARVES APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED UFC 4-152-01 28 July 2005 Change 1, 1 September 2012 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) DESIGN: PIERS AND WHARVES Any copyrighted material included in this UFC is identified at its point of use. Use of the copyrighted material apart from this UFC must have the permission of the copyright holder. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND (Preparing Activity) AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER SUPPORT AGENCY Record of Changes (changes are indicated by \1\ ... /1/) Change No. Date Location 1 1 Sep 2012 Added Appendix C; modified 2-3.1, 2-3.3.4, 2-5, 2-5.1, 2-5.2, 2-5.3, 2-6, 2-8.2.10, 3-3.5.3, 3-4.5, 4-1.3, 5-2.1.1, 5-3.3.1, 6-2.6, 6-8.1, 6-8.1.7 and 7-4.6; minor editorial modifications throughout This UFC supersedes MIL-HDBK-1025/1, Piers & Wharves, of 30 October 1987 with change 3 of 30 June 1994. UFC 4-152-01 28 July 2005 Change 1, 1 September 2012 FOREWORD The Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007 and provides planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and applies to the Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities in accordance with USD (AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. UFC will be used for all DoD projects and work for other customers where appropriate. All construction outside of the United States is also governed by Status of Forces Agreements (SOFA), Host Nation Funded Construction Agreements (HNFA), and in some instances, Bilateral Infrastructure Agreements (BIA.) Therefore, the acquisition team must ensure compliance with the most stringent of the UFC, the SOFA, the HNFA, and the BIA, as applicable. UFC are living documents and will be periodically reviewed, updated, and made available to users as part of the Services’ responsibility for providing technical criteria for military construction. Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HQUSACE), Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC), and Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment (AFCEE) are responsible for administration of the UFC system. Defense agencies should contact the preparing service for document interpretation and improvements. Technical content of UFC is the responsibility of the cognizant DoD working group. Recommended changes with supporting rationale should be sent to the respective service proponent office by the following electronic form: Criteria Change Request. The form is also accessible from the Internet sites listed below. UFC are effective upon issuance and are distributed only in electronic media from the following source: • Whole Building Design Guide web site http://dod.wbdg.org/. Hard copies of UFC printed from electronic media should be checked against the current electronic version prior to use to ensure that they are current. AUTHORIZED BY: ______________________________________ ______________________________________ DONALD L. BASHAM, P.E. DR. JAMES W WRIGHT, P.E. Chief, Engineering and Construction Division Chief Engineer U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Naval Facilities Engineering Command ______________________________________ ______________________________________ KATHLEEN I. FERGUSON, P.E. Dr. GET W. MOY, P.E. The Deputy Civil Engineer Director, Installations Requirements and DCS/Installations & Logistics Management Department of the Air Force Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment) UFC 4-152-01 28 July 2005 Change 1, 1 September 2012 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) NEW DOCUMENT SUMMARY SHEET Description of Change: UFC 4-152-01, DESIGN: PIERS AND WHARVES represents another step in the joint Services effort to bring uniformity to the planning, design and construction of piers and wharves. This UFC contains extensive modifications in the following areas: • Loads and seismic considerations • Fender Systems • Camels and Separators • Conversion from Mil-Hdbk to UFC and general updates and revisions Reasons for Change: The existing guidance was inadequate for the following reasons: • Previous document was nearly 20 years old • Need to convert to UFC format • Incorporation of changes described above • Update to referenced documents Impact: The following direct benefits will result from the update of 4-152-01, DESIGN: PIERS AND WHARVES: • Although primarily a U.S. Navy document, a single, comprehensive, up to date criteria document exists to cover design of piers and wharves. • Eliminates misinterpretation and ambiguities that could lead to design and construction conflicts. • Facilitates updates and revisions and promotes agreement and uniformity of design and construction between the Services. 1 UFC 4-152-01 28 July 2005 Change 1, 1 September 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 1-1 SCOPE. ................................................................................................................ 1 1-2 GENERAL FUNCTION. ....................................................................................... 1 1-3 FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES. ............................................................................. 1 1-3.1 Type I – Fueling, Ammunition, and Supply. .................................................. 1 1-3.2 Type II – General Purpose. ............................................................................. 2 1-3.3 Type III – Repair. ............................................................................................. 2 1-3.4 Type IV – Specialized. ..................................................................................... 3 1-4 FLEXIBILITY OF BERTHS. ................................................................................. 3 1-5 APPURTENANCES AND FEATURES. ............................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2: FACILITY PLANNING .............................................................................. 5 2-1 LOCATION AND ORIENTATION. ....................................................................... 5 2-1.1 General............................................................................................................. 5 2-1.2 Orientation for Environmental Conditions. ................................................... 5 2-1.3 Vessel Ingress and Egress............................................................................. 6 2-1.4 Water Depth. .................................................................................................... 7 2-1.5 Dolphins........................................................................................................... 7 2-2.1 General........................................................................................................... 11 2-3 OVERALL DIMENSIONS AND CLEARANCES. ............................................... 12 2-3.1 General........................................................................................................... 12 2-3.2 Pier and Wharf Length. ................................................................................. 15 2-3.3 Pier and Wharf Width. ................................................................................... 16 2-3.4 Slip. ................................................................................................................ 27 2-3.5 Pier and Wharf Deck Elevation. ................................................................... 29 2-4 UTILITIES........................................................................................................... 30 2-4.1 General........................................................................................................... 30 2-5 LIGHTING. ......................................................................................................... 31 2-5.1 Topside Lighting. .......................................................................................... 31 2-5.2 Lower Deck Lighting. .................................................................................... 31 2-5.3 Underdeck Lighting. ..................................................................................... 32 2-6 SECURITY. ........................................................................................................ 32 2-7 LANDSIDE APPROACHES ............................................................................... 32 2-7.1 Function. ........................................................................................................ 32 2-7.2 Roadway Width. ............................................................................................ 32 2-7.3 Walkway Width. ............................................................................................. 32 2-7.4 Roadway Deck Elevation. ............................................................................. 33 2-7.5 Number of Approaches. ............................................................................... 33 2-7.6 Turning Room. .............................................................................................. 33 2-7.7 Safety Barriers. ............................................................................................. 33 2-8 STRUCTURAL TYPES. ..................................................................................... 34 2-8.1 General........................................................................................................... 34 2-8.2
Recommended publications
  • Performance Prediction Program for Wind-Assisted Cargo Ships Prestandaprognosprogram För Fraktfartyg Med Vindassisterad Framdrivning
    DEGREE PROJECT IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2020 Performance Prediction Program for Wind-Assisted Cargo Ships Prestandaprognosprogram för fraktfartyg med vindassisterad framdrivning MARTINA RECHE VILANOVA KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES Performance Prediction Program for Wind-Assisted Cargo Ships MARTINA RECHE VILANOVA TRITA-SCI-GRU 2020:288 Degree Project in Mechanical Engineering, Second Cycle, 30 Credits Course SD271X, Degree Project in Naval Architecture Stockholm, Sweden 2020 School of Engineering Sciences KTH Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44, Stockholm Sweden Telephone: +46 8 790 60 00 Per tu, Papi. Et trobem a faltar. Acknowledgements I wish to express my sincere appreciation to my supervisor from the Fluid Engineering Department of DNV GL, Heikki Hansen, for his wonderful support, guidance and honesty. I would also like to pay my special regards to Hasso Hoffmeister for his constant dedication and help and to everyone from DNV GL whose assistance was a milestone in the completion of this project: Uwe Hollenbach, Ole Hympendahl and Karsten Hochkirch. It was a pleasure to work with all of you. Furthermore, I wish to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor Prof. Harry B. Bingham from the section of Fluid Mechanics, Coastal and Maritime Engineering at DTU, who always sup- ported, guided and steered me in the right direction. My thanks also go to my other supervisor, Hans Liwång from the Centre for Naval Architecture at KTH, who have always had an open ear for me since the first day we met. The contribution of Ville Paakkari from Norsepower Oy Ltd, who provided the Maersk Pelican data for the validation of this Performance Prediction Program, is truly appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Ship Hydrodynamics Practical Ship Hydrodynamics
    Practical Ship Hydrodynamics Practical Ship Hydrodynamics Volker Bertram Butterworth-Heinemann Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP 225 Wildwood Avenue, Woburn, MA 01801-2041 A division of Reed Educational and Professional Publishing Ltd First published 2000 Volker Bertram 2000 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any material form (including photocopying or storing in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication) without the written permission of the copyright holder except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London, England W1P 9HE. Applications for the copyright holder’s written permission to reproduce any part of this publication should be addressed to the publishers British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Bertram, Volker Practical ship hydrodynamics 1. Ships – Hydrodynamics I. Title 623.8012 Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data Bertram, Volker. Practical ship hydrodynamics / Volker Bertram. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0 7506 4851 1 1. Ships – Hydrodynamics I. Title. VM156 .B457 2000 623.8012–dc21 00-034269 ISBN 0 7506 4851 1 Typeset by Laser Words, Madras, India Printed in Great Britain by Preface ............................................. ix 1 Introduction .................................. 1 1.1 Overview of problems and approaches ............................................ 1 1.2 Model tests similarity laws.............. 4 1.3 Full-scale trials ................................. 8 1.4 Numerical approaches (computational fluid dynamics) ............... 9 1.4.1 Basic equations ............................. 9 1.4.2 Basic CFD techniques..................
    [Show full text]
  • David Taylor Model Basin
    4 4 £ &l. A & HYDROMECHANICS NEW RESEARCH RESOURCES ATTHE DAVID TAYLOR MODEL BASIN o by AERODYNAMICS Captain E.A. Wright, USN o STRUCTURAL MECHAN ICS o RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT REPORT APPLIED MATHEMATICS January 1959 Report 1292 NEW RESEARCH RESOURCES AT THE DAVID TAYLOR MODEL BASIN by Captain E.A. Wright, USN Reprint of paper presented at Spring Meeting of The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers Old Point Comfort, Virginia, June 2-3 1958 January 1959 Report 1292 New Research Resources at the David Taylor Model Basin By Capt. E. A. Wright, USN,'Member This paper describes briefly many of the new laboratory facilities and instruments in the field of ship model research.A planar-motion mechanism now provides hydrodynamic coefficients for the differential equations of motion, a heaving tow- point simulates ship pitching for bodies towed over the stern, a boundary-layer research tunnel reveals the effects of pressure gradients, differential transformers permit miniaturized transducers and remote digital recording, a pneumatic wave- maker generates a programmed frequency spectrum, a large transonic tunnel provides high Reynolds numbers in air, a submarine test tank extends the scope of structural research, a flutter dynamometer explores the phenomenon on control surfaces in water, a large variable-pressure water tunnel provides for testing con- tra-rotating propellers, and seakeeping and rotating-arm basins add new dimen- sions to research in naval architecture at the David Taylor Model Basin.The gamut in size runs from a 6-knot towing carriage for a 57-ft model basin to a 60-knot towing carriage for a 2968-ft basin, and from a transient-thrust dynamometer that serves as the strut barrel of a ship model to a 40,000-lb vibration generator that excites full-scale ship structures.Developments like these suggest to the author several trends in ship research.
    [Show full text]
  • ONR/YIP Awards to Dr. Ryan Eustice and Dr. Dave Singer
    University of Michigan College of Engineering Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering FALL/WINTER 2007 Nautilus V olume 29 The Newsletter of The Department of ONR/YIP Awards to Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering Dr. Ryan Eustice and Dr. Dave Singer Assistant Research Scientist David Singer will confront include, the sheer size of and Assistant Professor Ryan Eustice are the 160,000 sq ft area of a CNV’s hull the recipients of the 2007 Office of Naval at 40 plus depth along with the added Research Young Investigator Award complexity of low visibility, complex (ONR/YIP). These prestigious awards hull geometry (screws, rudders) and the represent two firsts; the first University acoustically noisy environment of a ship of Michigan department to receive two dockside. This work will set the basis for ONR/YIP awards in the same year and the alleviating the need to put Navy divers at first UM research faculty, Dr. Singer, to risk in this dangerous task. get the ONR/YIP award at the University of Michigan. Dr. Singer received the award for his proposal titled “Development and Dr. Eustice received the award for his Testing of a Hybrid Agent Approach proposal titled “Real-Time Visually for Set-Based Conceptual Ship Design Augmented Navigation for Autonomous through the Use of a Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Search and Inspection of Ship Hulls and Agent to Facilitate Communications and INSIDE Port Facilities.” This research will address Negotiation”. Currently, the Navy incurs ONR/YIP Awards .......................1 the time-consuming and imprecise present a great deal of cost late in a project, where From the Desk ............................2 Secretary of the Navy Visit ........2 day methods for ship-hull inspection.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulcanus Studytour 2013
    Vulcanus Studytour 2013 Northern Germany: Bremen, Hamburg, Papenburg, Rendsburg Vulcanus Studytour 2013 Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Advertisements ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Participants .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Program ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Monday – 08/07/13 ............................................................................................................................ 7 Tuesday – 09/07/13 ............................................................................................................................ 7 Wednesday – 10/07/13 ....................................................................................................................... 7 Thursday – 11/07/13 ........................................................................................................................... 7 Monday: Travelling to Germany .............................................................................................................. 8 Monday: Meyer Werft ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Specialist Committee on Wake Fields Final Reports and Recommendations to the 25Th ITTC
    Proceedings of 25th ITTC – Volume II 535 The Specialist Committee on Wake Fields Final Reports and Recommendations to the 25th ITTC 1. GENERAL • Rome, Italy, September 2006 at INSEAN before the ONR Symposium. 1.1 Membership and Meetings • Tokyo, Japan, April 2007 at the The members of the Specialist Committee National Maritime Research Institute on Wake-Fields of the 25th ITTC are: (NMRI). • Dr. Jin Kim (Chairman) • Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A., August Maritime & Ocean Engineering 2007 at the Naval Surface Warfare Research Institute (MOERI), KORDI Center Carderock Division (NSWC- Daejeon, Korea CD). • Dr. Thomas C. Fu (Secretary) • Gdansk, Poland, January 2008 at the Naval Surface Warfare Center Ship Design and Research Center Carderock Division (NSWC-CD) (CTO-SA). W. Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A. 1.2 Tasks • Dr. Tomasz Bugalski Ship Design and Research Center The recommendations for the work of the (CTO-SA), Gdansk, Poland Specialist Committee on Wake-Fields as given by the 24th ITTC were as follows: • Dr. Munehiko Hinatsu National Maritime Research Institute • Conduct a survey of numerical methods (NMRI) for prediction of wake-fields at model Tokyo, Japan and full scale. • Dr. Fabio Di Felice • Review the experimental methods of INSEAN Italian Ship Model Basin determining the velocity distribution in Rome, Italy the wake. Five committee meetings have been held • Develop procedures for measuring the during the work period: velocity distribution in the wake at model and full scale. • Daejeon, Korea, January 2006 at the Maritime & Ocean Engineering • Review and update the existing Research Institute (MOERI)/KORDI. guidelines for the simulation of the wake-field for cavitation testing.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING-100Th ANNIVERSARY
    McAllister Inaugurates Jacksonville Service With The New 'Brooks K. McAllister' (Page 4) NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING-100th ANNIVERSARY MAY 1986 ISSUE Posidonia^ IIoo£i5cdvia The International Shipping Exhibition From 2-7 June 1986 the key executives of the world-wide shipping community will be in Greece for Posidonia, the International Shipping Exhibition. "the regular meeting point Posidonia is sponsored by the Greek Ministry of Mercantile Marine, The Municipality of Piraeus, the for the leading decision Union of Greek Shipowners, the Greek Chamber of Shipping, makers in the shipping the Association of Shipowners of Greek Passenger Ships and * of the world" the Greek Shipping Cooperation Committee. For full details contact: Posidonia Exhibitions Ltd. 180 Syngrou Avenue. 176 71 Athens, Greece Tel. (01) 95.94.603, 95.94.625, 95.94.647 Telex: 21 9075 EXPO GR. v of Z^ef9 It Gre ; ATtxtiAUini IMlU'CCMIVfUU The biggest call on McAllister Circle 250 on Reader Service Card McAllister Brothers Inc. Towing and Transportation. 17 Battery Place, New York, N.Y. 10004 (212) 269-3200 Baltimore (301) 547-8678 • Norfolk (804) 627-3651 Philadelphia (215) 922-6200 • San Juan (809) 721-8888 Jacksonville (904) 743-9226 McAllister^ MARITIME REPORTER and Engineering News ON THE Editorial and Executive Offices 118 East 25th Street, New York, NY 10010 COVER (212) 477-6700 • ITT Telex: 424768 MARINTI McAllister Inaugurates Jackson* ille Sen ice With Publishers: JOHN E. O'MALLEY Brooks K McAllister CHARLES P. O'MALLEY PAGE 24 Editorial Director: CHARLES P. O'MALLEY Editor: ROBERT WARE S.N.A.M.E. Spring Meeting/ Senior Editor: THOMAS H.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Discussion B.1: Model Manufacturing and Accuracy Group Discussion Chair: Mr
    23rd International Towing Tank Proceedings of the 23rd ITTC – Volume III 755 Conference Group Discussion B.1: Model Manufacturing and Accuracy Group Discussion Chair: Mr. Tony Randell (IMD-NRC) SUMMARY sign and manufacturing with 3- and 5-axis by Tony C. Randell CNC milling machines. The presentation de- scribes the procedure for model construction IMD-NRC, St. John’s, NF, Canada manufacturing, inspection and finishing. Short description of contributions Dr. Yoshitaka Ukon, Head Ship Performance Design Group, Advanced Mr. Jan Holtrop Maritime Transport Technology Department, MARIN, Wageningen, The Netherlands National Maritime Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan A brief introduction to a four-page handout written by Jan de Boer of MARIN. The paper NMRI manufactured three of KCS models describes upgrades and improvements to the (prepared for the CFD Workshop in Gothen- model manufacturing operations at MARIN burg in 2000) with the same size but different that have taken place over the past several methods, and the inspection on each model years. was made using three-dimensional digitisers. The resistance tests were performed on three Dr. Jin-Tae Lee, Director-General models with several runs. The comparison of KRISO, Daejon, Korea five runs of resistance tests results on three models are presented. Uncertainty analysis on KRISO (Korea Research Institute of Ship the resistance test was partly performed but and Ocean Engineering) recently installed two has not been fully accomplished yet. 5-axis Numerically Controlled machines for ship and propeller models, respectively, with Mr. Tony C. Randell, P. Eng., Leader powerful CAD/CAM software. They not only Design and Fabrication, National Research improved the accuracy of manufacturing, but Council, Institute for Marine Dynamics, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Damen Contracts Hamburg Ship Model Basin for New Frigate Tests
    PRESS RELEASE +49 (0) 40 69 203 [email protected] hsva.de 2021-04-26 Damen contracts Hamburg Ship Model Basin for new frigate tests Damen Shipyards Group and the Hamburg Ship Model Basin have concluded a contract for an extensive series of model tests for the hydrodynamic development of the F126 frigates for the German Navy. Damen Naval and the Hamburg Ship Model Basin (HSVA) today signed the contract for comprehensive cooperation relating to hydrodynamic optimisation and the execution of an extensive series of model tests for the new 126-class (F126) frigates. The optimisation work and the tests constitute part of the early development stage during the ship design phase. As part of this process, the properties of the planned ship will be tested under real-life conditions. As such, a true-to-scale model of the F126, measuring several metres long, will be seen for the first time. At the request of the German Navy, together with its partners Blohm+Voss and Thales, Damen will build a total of four frigate class 126 ships after it was named the successful bidder in 2020 as part of a European tender spanning several years. The first ship is expected to be handed over to the German Navy in 2028 in Hamburg. The ships will be constructed in Germany with building taking place in Hamburg, Kiel and Wolgast. By appointing HSVA, which boasts both a long history and impressive innovative prowess, Damen will be able to draw exclusively on German expertise for testing and trialling the ship’s design. Over the next few months, the model ship will undergo a wide range of tests in various HSVA testing facilities in Hamburg.
    [Show full text]
  • On Sharks & Humanity the Search for Endeavour Krait and Operation Jaywick
    Summer 2018–19 Number 125 December to February sea.museum $9.95 On Sharks & Humanity Art for social action The search for Endeavour What became of Cook’s famous ship? Krait and Operation Jaywick Marking the 75th anniversary Bearings Contents From the Director Summer 2018–19 Number 125 December to February sea.museum $9.95 THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL MARITIME MUSEUM was built Acknowledgment of country 2 On Sharks & Humanity more than 25 years ago, as a key attraction in the massive The Australian National Maritime An international travelling exhibition focuses on shark conservation regeneration of the former port of Darling Harbour. The blueprint Museum acknowledges the Gadigal people of the Eora nation as the 10 Endeavour returns to sea used for this waterfront rejuvenation was first employed in the traditional custodians of the bamal Berths now available for local and international voyages 1970s by town planners in Baltimore Harbour, USA, where instead (earth) and badu (waters) on which we work. of a national maritime museum, they built a national aquarium. 14 Piecing together a puzzle We also acknowledge all traditional The search for Cook’s Endeavour in Newport Harbour, Rhode Island Our museum lies within the country’s busiest tourist precinct, custodians of the land and waters 20 Refitting a raider which receives more than 25 million visits a year, and is also the throughout Australia and pay our respects to them and their cultures, Restoring MV Krait for the 75th anniversary of Operation Jaywick Australian government’s most visible national cultural institution in and to elders past and present.
    [Show full text]
  • Netherlands Ship Model Basin Wageningen, the Netherlands
    Netherlands Ship Model Basin Wageningen, the Netherlands Annual report 1975 Foundation Netherlands Ship Model Basin Wageningen, the Netherlands On March 12,1976, before this Annual Report went to press, Mr. John W. Hup­ kes, chairman of the Board of Directors, passed away. He was succeeded by Mr. P. E. E. Kleyn van WilHgen. The Netherlands Ship Model Basin is located in Wageningen, Haagsteeg 2, P.O. Box 28, Telephone: (08370) 19140 Telex: 45148 '• Telegrams: Modeltank Bankers: Algemene Bank Nederland N.V., Wageningen, Account: 53.93.39.156 The Depressurized Towing Tank is located in Ede, Niels Bohrstraat 10 Telephone: (08380) 19115 Contents Memorial John W. Hupkes 5 Board of Directors, Management, Advisory Board, Consultant, Representatives abroad 6 Memorial Kein Timman 9 General 10 Industrial service and research to create new possibilities for 12 industrial service Powering, ship propulsion 12 Deep water towing tanlc 12 Cavitation tunnels 15 Depressurized towing tank 16 Propulsion and ship hydrodynamics 18 Strength and vibrations 20 Ocean engineering, ship dynamics 22 Seakeeping basin 22 Towing tank for unconventional maritime constructions 23 Wave and current basin 24 Shallow water basin 27 Manoeuvring simulator 27 Computer centre 30 Personnel 32 Prospects 33 Some important figures 34 Specification of orders and NSMB research in 1974 36 Specification of orders and NSMB research in 1975 37 Organization scheme of the NSMB 38 Publications, lectures, meetings 39 Up to the last moment, full of spirit and charm, with a style of living - of thinking - and doing, he stimulated his colleagues, and friends. This picture of him is stroiig, and will stay long alive.
    [Show full text]
  • Luanrteatfr Mrrali Manchester, Conn
    20 — MANCIIKS'^KR HERALD, Siiturday, Aufi, 13. 19H3 Early training Love after 50 can boost — it’s worth it Pohl confident he’ll get Pope at last has state files suit signatures by deadline \mass at Lourdes ¥s. Coventry continued from page 11 children’s IQ X disputes the idea that the elderly have no sexual page 3 page 7 page 10 By Sharon Rutenberg desire. United Press International Love is good therapy in the post-60 years, she says.- Special problems the elderly face — aging, senility,' CHICAGO — Parents can helpraiselheirchildren’s sickness — do not render them incapable of loving or intelligence level permanently by using early being loved, she says. learning techniques with 3-and 4-year-olds, says author Joan Beck. BUT WHAT ARE the odds of people finding mates in This may involve leaching toddlers a second later years? language or reading skills at home. Pretty discouraging, actually. Fair tonight; Mrs. Beck, a Chicago Tribune editorial writer and Women, especially those past age 6S, are at an Manchester, Conn. best-selling author of "How to Raise a Brighter extreme disadvantage. sunny, warm Tuesday In a recent census of those 65 and over, there were Monday, Aug. 15, 1983 Child." points the way in her recently published "Best — See page 2 Beginnings: Giving Your Child a Head Start in Life." approximately 145 women per 100 men, or 14 million Single copy; 25<t (Putnam. $14.9.5). women to ten million men. lUanrteatFr Mrrali "It was the thing that was missing when I had my Among the widowed, there are five times as many own children — because I saw in them an eagerness to widows as widowers.
    [Show full text]