Ederfugleoptællinger I Ilulissat, Uummannaq Og Upernavik Kommuner, 1998-2001
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Ederfugleoptællinger i Ilulissat, Uummannaq og Upernavik Kommuner, 1998-2001 Teknisk rapport nr. 43, 2002 Pinngortitaleriffik, Grønlands Naturinstitut 1 Titel: Ederfugleoptællinger i Ilulissat, Uummannaq og Upernavik Kommuner, 1998-2001 Forfatter: Flemming Ravn Merkel Oversættelse: Sofia Geisler Serie: Teknisk rapport nr. 43, 2002 Udgiver: Grønlands Naturinstitut Forsidefoto: Flemming Ravn Merkel ISBN: 87-90024-89-3 ISSN: 1397-3657 Layout: Kirsten Rydahl Tryk: Oddi Printing Ltd., Reykjavik, Iceland Oplag: 150 Reference: Merkel, F.R., 2002. Ederfugleoptællinger i Ilulissat, Uummannaq og Upernavik Kommuner, 1998-2001. Pinngortitaleriffik, Grønlands Naturinstitut, teknisk rapport nr. 43. 78 pp. Rekvireres hos: Grønlands Naturinstitut Postboks 570 DK-3900 Nuuk Grønland Telefon: +299 32 10 95 Fax: +299 32 59 57 www.natur.gl 2 Ederfugleoptællinger i Ilulissat, Uummannaq og Upernavik Kommuner, 1998-2001 Af Flemming Ravn Merkel Teknisk rapport nr. 43, 2002 Pinngortitaleriffik, Grønlands Naturinstitut 3 Indholdsfortegnelse Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Eqikkaaneq .................................................................................................................................................... 6 Resumé .......................................................................................................................................................... 8 1. Indledning.............................................................................................................................................. 10 2. Metoder .................................................................................................................................................. 11 2.1. Undersøgelsesområde ............................................................................................................... 11 2.2. Optællingsprocedure ................................................................................................................. 13 2.3. Optælling af rastende ederfugle ............................................................................................. 14 2.4. Andre koloniynglende fugle .................................................................................................... 15 2.5. Dataanalyse................................................................................................................................. 15 3. Resultater og diskussion ..................................................................................................................... 16 3.1. Tidsmæssig placering af optællinger og ynglefænologi ..................................................... 16 3.2. Yngleudbredelse og antal ......................................................................................................... 17 3.3. År-til-år variation og usikkerhedsgrænser ........................................................................... 18 3.4. Bestandsudvikling...................................................................................................................... 22 3.5. Ægsamling og prædation ......................................................................................................... 25 3.6. Kuldstørrelse (æg) ...................................................................................................................... 26 3.7. Kolonistørrelser .......................................................................................................................... 27 3.8. Rastende ederfugle .................................................................................................................... 27 4. Konklusion ............................................................................................................................................. 31 4.1. Bestandsopgørelse ...................................................................................................................... 31 4.2. Årsager til bestandsnedgang................................................................................................... 32 5. Anbefalinger .......................................................................................................................................... 34 6. Litteraturliste......................................................................................................................................... 36 Appendiks 1. Kolonibeskrivelser ........................................................................................................... 38 Appendiks 2. Kort med sejlruter og koloniangivelser ...................................................................... 69 4 Summary Canada and Greenland share the same com- Based on the number of active nests the study mon eider population - the northern common area holds a total number of 4.097 breeding eider subspecies Somateria mollissima borealis. pairs. A number of colonies were counted In both Canada and Greenland there has two or three times in subsequent years, and been a growing concern that several decades revealed substantial variation in breeding of intensive utilization, especially in Green- numbers from one year to another. Based land, have caused the population to decline. on these uncertainties 95% confidence limits Internationally a Circumpolar Eider Concerva- are calculated as being 4.097 ± 468 breeding tion Strategy and Action Plan has been com- pairs. pleted, and in Greenland monitoring work has been intensified to improve the manage- This study shows that a large-scale decline ment basis for this common eider popula- has occurred in the common eider breeding tion. popultion. At 15 eider colonies within the Upenavik region, from which comparable This report presents the result from eider and well-documented surveys were conduc- ground surveys conducted systematically ted app. 40 years ago, the breeding popula- along the west coast of Greenland, covering tion counted 3.361 nests in 1960-65, but the municipality of Ilulissat, Uummannaq, only 662 nests in 1998-2001. This corre- and Upernavik (69° 15’ N - 74° 05’ N). The sponds to an overall decline of 80% or an study has served the purpose of providing an annual population decline of app. 4%. A up-to-date estimate of the total breeding po- variance components analyses demonstrate pulation within this area, and to detect if that year-to-year variation within colonies any major changes in breeding numbers have cannot explain such a change. A more occurred at colonies for which comparable rough comparison, that includes previous historical information exist. Ground surveys less accurate estimates of another 36 colo- were conducted in July during four breeding nies, shows a similar tendency. From a total seasons (1998-2001), and breeding numbers of 51 eider colonies that that had been sur- were quantified by counting active nests. veyed in either 1920 or during 1960-1965, 22 colonies were non-existing during this A total of 112 eider colonies were identified survey (1998-2001). At 14 colonies the bree- within the study area of which 29 were ding population have declined in numbers, known from historical monitoring work in and for the remaining 15 colonies the popu- Greenland. The remaining 83 colonies do lation trend is uncertain. Thus, 70% of all not represent recent established colonies, resurveyed colonies have either disappeared but instead they reflect the fact that previ- or declined in breeding numbers during a ous surveys covered only a minor parts of period of 40-80 years. the distribution area. Very old nest cups were frequently detected at these colonies. A large proportion of the eider nest bowls Most colonies (94 ~ 84%) were detected contained down but no eggs. For the entire within the Upernavik region, and only a study area 27.5% of the nest bowls contai- few were found within the Uummannaq ning down (Ntotal = 3,332) had no eggs, cor- and Ilulissat region – 9 in each region. responding to app. 3,400 missing eggs. This could be due to either human egg collection The vast majority of colonies contained only (which is illegal) or predation. Apparently small number of breeding birds. No more gulls were the main predators of eider eggs, that 9% of all colonies had more than a 100 however, based on the number of left be- nests. Median colony size was 10 nests. hind eggshells found within the colonies or 5 nearby, the impact was not high. Overall as others, clearly indicates that the present 433 eggshells were found in the study area, management of the Canadian/Greenlandic corresponding to app. 3.5% of the total egg northern common eider population is not production. sustainable. At the moment the Greenlandic hunting legislation is being revised, and it is Overall mean clutch size was 3.51 eggs/ of the utmost importance that this will lead nest (not including empty down nests), to a more thorough protection of the com- however, varied considerably from one mon eider. colony to another (2.6 – 5.0). Mean clutch size was significantly higher within the During the past five years most common eider Upernavik region compared to the regions breeding grounds in the central and northern further south (Uummannaq and Ilulissat). part of West Greenland have been surveyed, This might be related to less egg collection and will provide a new basis for future moni- or predation within the Upernavik region. toring work within this area. Priorities should It is not