DOCSLIB.ORG

General Assembly A/HRC/7/14/Add.1 25 February 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General Assembly A/HRC/7/14/Add.1 25 February 2008 ENGLISH/FRENCH/SPANISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Seventh session Agenda Item 3 PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF ALL HUMAN RIGHTS, CIVIL, POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT The right to freedom of opinion and expression Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Ambeyi Ligabo Addendum Summary of cases transmitted to Governments and replies received ∗ ∗∗ ∗ The present document is being circulated as received, in the languates of submission only, as it greatly exceeds the word limitations currently imposed by the relevant General Assembly Resolutions ∗∗ The present report was submitted later than the indicated deadline, in order to incorporate the latest available information on the subject matter A/HRC/7/14/Add.1 Page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Introduction 1-6 5 SUMMARY OF CASES TRANSMITTED AND REPLIES 7-778 7 RECEIVED Afghanistan ……………………………………………………… 7-12 6 Algeria …………………………………………………………… 13-16 7 Angola …………………………………………………………… 17-19 8 Argentina ………………………………………………………… 20-22 9 Azerbaijan ……………………………………………………….. 23-27 9 Bahrain …………………………….…………………………….. 28-40 11 Bangladesh ………………………………………………………. 41-50 15 Bhutan……………………………………………………………. 51 19 Bolivia …………………………………………………………… 52-54 19 Brazil …………………………………………………………….. 55-57 20 Bulgaria …………………………………………………………... 58-61 21 Cambodia…………………………………………………………. 62-68 22 Cameroon…………………………………………………………. 69-70 25 Chad ……………………………………………………………… 71-72 25 Chile ……………………………………………………………… 73-75 26 China ………………………………………….………………….. 76-132 27 Colombia ……………………………………….………………… 133-157 42 Congo (Republic of the) ………………………………………….. 158-160 51 Côte d’Ivoire ……………………………………………………… 161-162 51 Cuba ……………………………………………………………… 163-168 52 Democratic Republic of the Congo ……………………………… 169-183 54 Djibouti …………………………………………….…………….. 184-186 58 Dominican Republic ……………………………………………... 187-188 59 Ecuador…………………………………………………………… 189-190 59 Egypt ……………………………………………….…………….. 191-200 60 El Salvador ……………………………………………………….. 201-205 63 Eritrea ……………………………………………….……………. 206-207 64 Ethiopia ……………………………………………….………….. 208-216 65 Fiji ………………………………………………………………… 217-226 68 Gambia …………………………………………………………… 227-229 71 Georgia …………………………………………………….……... 230-232 71 Guatemala …………………………………………………….….. 233-244 72 Guinea ………………………………………………….………… 245-249 76 Guinée-Bissau ……………………………………………………. 250-251 77 Haiti …………………………………………………….………… 252-254 77 Hungary ………………………………………………………….. 255-257 78 India …………………………………………………….………… 258-264 78 Iran (Islamic Republic of) ……………………………….……….. 265-322 80 Iraq ……………………………………………………….………. 323-347 93 A/HRC/7/14/Add.1 Page 3 CONTENTS (continued) Paragraphs Page Israel ……………………………………………………………… 348-356 98 Jordan ……………………………………………………………….. 357-363 98 Kazakhstan ……………………………………………………….. 364-367 99 Kyrgyzstan ……………………………………………………….. 368-373 99 Liberia ..…………………………………………………………... 374-376 101 Libyan Arab Jamahiriya …………………………………..……… 377-380 102 Malaysia ………………………………………………………….. 381-394 103 Mali ……………………………………………………………….. 395-397 106 Mauritania ………………………………………………………... 398-399 107 Mexico ……………………………………………………………. 400-416 108 Morocco ………………………………………………………….. 417-426 115 Myanmar …………………………………………………………. 427-451 118 Nepal ……………………………………………………………... 452-465 124 Niger ……………………………………………………………… 466-473 127 Nigeria ……………………………………………………………. 474-477 129 Pakistan …………………………………………………………... 478-497 130 Panama …………………………………………………………… 498-499 135 Paraguay ………………………………………………………….. 500-503 136 Peru ………………………………………………………………. 504-514 137 Philippines ………………………………………………………... 515-528 139 Republic of Moldova ……………………………………………... 529-532 143 Republic of Serbia ……………………………………………….. 533-534 144 Russian Federation ……………………………………………….. 535-582 144 Rwanda …………………………………………………………… 583-588 155 Senegal …………………………………………………………… 589-593 156 Somalia …………………………………………………………... 594-602 158 South Africa ……………………………………………………… 603-604 160 Sri Lanka …………………………………………………………. 605-631 160 Sudan …………………………………………………………….. 632-643 165 Syrian Arab Republic ……………………………………………. 644-660 168 Thailand ………………………………………………………….. 661-670 173 Tunisia ……………………………………………………………. 671-676 175 Turkey ……………………………………………………………. 677-690 177 Turkmenistan …………………………………………………….. 691-693 180 Uganda …………………………………………………………… 694-695 181 Ukraine …………………………………………………………... 696-702 181 United Arab Emirates ……………………………………………. 703-704 182 United States of America ………………………………………… 705-707 183 Uzbekistan ………………………………………………………... 708-721 184 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) ……………………………… 722-733 188 Viet Nam …………………………………………………………. 734-742 191 A/HRC/7/14/Add.1 Page 4 CONTENTS (continued) Paragraphs Page Yemen ……………………………………………………………. 743-748 192 Zimbabwe ………………………………………………………… 749-774 194 Information transmitted to the Palestinian Authority………………… 775-777 199 Annex …………………………………………………………….. 201 A/HRC/7/14/Add.1 Page 5 INTRODUCTION 1. At its sixty-first session, the Commission on Human Rights, in its resolution 2005/38 entitled ‘The right to freedom of opinion and expression’, appealed to all States to cooperate fully with and assist the Special Rapporteur in the performance of his tasks, and to provide him with all necessary information requested by him. The Human Rights Council, in its decision 1/102, dated 30 June 2006, decided to extend exceptionally for one year, subject to the review to be undertaken by the Human Rights Council in conformity with General Assembly resolution 60/251, the mandates and the mandate holders of all the special procedures of the Commission on Human Rights. The Human Rights Council also requested the special procedures to continue with the implementation of their mandates and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue to provide them with the necessary support. 2. In accordance with the above-mentioned provisions, the present report contains, on a country-by-country basis, summaries of general and individual allegations, as well as urgent appeals transmitted to Governments between 1 January and 31 December 2007, as well as replies received from Governments until 15 January 2008. Replies to communications received after 15 January 2008 will be included in the next communication report of the Special Rapporteur, as well as replies not yet translated by that date. Observations made by the Special Rapporteur have also been included where applicable. 3. During the period under review, the Special Rapporteur transmitted 241 communications on behalf of 623 persons to the Governments of 81 countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Angola, Argentina, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Chad, Chile, China (People's Republic of), Colombia, Congo (Republic of the), Côte d’Ivoire, Cuba, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Egypt, El Salvador, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Fiji, Gambia, Georgia, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinée-Bissau, Haiti, Hungary, India, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Malaysia, Mali, Morocco, Mauritania, México, Myanmar, Nepal, Niger, Nigeria, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Republic of Moldova, Republic of Serbia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Russian Federation, Rwanda, Senegal, Somalia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Republic of Tanzania, United States of America, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen, and Zimbabwe. Two communications were sent to the Palestinian Authorithy. 4. Owing to restrictions on the length of documents, the Special Rapporteur has reduced details of communications sent and received. The full text of all communications is available within the files of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. 5. In reporting on the communications, the Special Rapporteur has used initials for those victims who, in the Special Rapporteur’s opinion, could be in a potentially sensitive situation, in order to respect their privacy and to prevent the possibility of further victimization. With a view to preserve the presumption of innocence, the Special Rapporteur omitted to include the names of alleged perpetrators, and of other individuals involved in the cases included in this report. Conversely, Governments’ communications may contain names of persons and/or disclose specific situations linked to the violation. A/HRC/7/14/Add.1 Page 6 6. The Special Rapporteur wishes to reiterate that violations and concerns regarding the right to freedom of opinion and expression are, to different extents, a common phenomenon in the whole world. Consequently, the exclusion or the inclusion of a particular country or territory should not be interpreted as the indication of any specific choice done by the Special Rapporteur regarding the analysis of trends and patterns of the implementation of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. SUMMARY OF CASES TRANSMITTED AND REPLIES RECEIVED Afghanistan Letter of allegations sent on 12 March 2007 7. The Special Rapporteur brought to the attention of the Government a case in which the Minister of Culture and Information and 50 security personnel allegedly entered the Radio Television Afghanistan (RTA) headquarters, during the absence of the then director-general, Mr. Najib Roshan, to dismiss the chief of the news section. It is alleged that the Minister instructed the security guards
Recommended publications
  • Anthoney Udel 0060D

    Anthoney Udel 0060D

    INCLUSION WITHOUT MODERATION: POLITICAL VIOLENCE AND DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION BY RELIGIOUS GROUPS by Cheryl Mariani Anthoney A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and International Relations Spring 2018 © 2018 Cheryl Anthoney All Rights Reserved INCLUSION WITHOUT MODERATION: POLITICAL VIOLENCE AND DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION BY RELIGIOUS GROUPS by Cheryl Mariani Anthoney Approved: __________________________________________________________ David P. Redlawsk, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Political Science and International Relations Approved: __________________________________________________________ George H. Watson, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Approved: __________________________________________________________ Ann L. Ardis, Ph.D. Senior Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ Muqtedar Khan, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ Stuart Kaufman,
  • Civil Courage Newsletter

    Civil Courage Newsletter

    Civil Courag e News Journal of the Civil Courage Prize Vol. 11, No. 2 • September 2015 For Steadfast Resistance to Evil at Great Personal Risk Bloomberg Editor-in-Chief John Guatemalans Claudia Paz y Paz and Yassmin Micklethwait to Deliver Keynote Barrios Win 2015 Civil Courage Prize Speech at the Ceremony for Their Pursuit of Justice and Human Rights ohn Micklethwait, Bloomberg’s his year’s recipients of the JEditor-in-Chief, oversees editorial TCivil Courage Prize, Dr. content across all platforms, including Claudia Paz y Paz and Judge Yassmin news, newsletters, Barrios, are extraordinary women magazines, opinion, who have taken great risks to stand television, radio and up to corruption and injustice in digital properties, as their native Guatemala. well as research ser- For over 18 years, Dr. Paz y Paz vices such as has been dedicated to improving her Claudia Paz y Paz Bloomberg Intelli - country’s human rights policies. She testing, wiretaps and other technol - gence. was the national consultant to the ogy, she achieved unprecedented re - Prior to joining UN mission in Guatemala and sults in sentences for homicide, rape, Bloomberg in February 2015, Mickle- served as a legal advisor to the violence against women, extortion thwait was Editor-in-Chief of The Econo - Human Rights Office of the Arch - and kidnapping. mist, where he led the publication into the bishop. In 1994, she founded the In - In a country where witnesses, digital age, while expanding readership stitute for Com- prosecutors, and and enhancing its reputation. parative Criminal judges were threat - He joined The Economist in 1987, as Studies of Guate- ened and killed, she a finance correspondent and served as mala, a human courageously Business Editor and United States Editor rights organization sought justice for before being named Editor-in-Chief in that promotes the victims of the 2006.
  • Europe in the First Six Months of 2011, Particularly in Central and Eastern Europe

    Europe in the First Six Months of 2011, Particularly in Central and Eastern Europe

    http://www.freemedia.at E U R O P E Turkey, Belarus, Hungary Cause Particular Concern By Steven M. Ellis, Press Freedom Adviser The International Press Institute (IPI) is concerned at media freedom developments in Europe in the first six months of 2011, particularly in Central and Eastern Europe. While the region overall had one of the lowest death tolls in the world for journalists in the first half of 2011, with two murdered in Russia, it saw ongoing harassment of journalists in countries like Turkey and Belarus, and backsliding on safeguards for media independence in countries like Hungary. Impunity for attacks on journalists remained a major issue from Russia to the Balkans, and bright spots like the release of jailed journalist Eynulla Fatullayev in Azerbaijan in May were often overshadowed by a climate of repression. Former Soviet‐bloc countries continued to experience difficulty ensuring that governments view media as independent, and not as a tool for the dissemination of propaganda. Across Europe, self‐ censorship was exacerbated by archaic criminal defamation laws that remained on the books, setting both a negative example and actually serving as the basis for prosecutions of journalists in Italy. Turkey presented one of the worst pictures on the continent. According to the Freedom for Journalists Platform, an umbrella group representing national and local groups in Turkey, the government holds approximately 70 journalists in jail, apparently more than any other country in the world. A study released in April by the Organization for Security and Co‐operation in Europe (OSCE)’s Representative on Freedom of the Media, Dunja Mijatović, found that the country was then holding at least 57 journalists in prison, most under anti‐terrorism laws or laws against membership in an armed criminal organization.
  • Report on Human Rights in Yemen

    Report on Human Rights in Yemen

    Report on Human Rights in Yemen Submitted by Human Rights Watch To the UN Human Rights Committee on the Occasion of its Review of Yemen in March 2012 February 1, 2012 This memorandum provides an overview of Human Rights Watch’s main concerns with respect to the human rights situation in the Republic of Yemen, submitted to the United Nations Human Rights Committee (“the Committee”) in advance of its review of Yemen in March 2012. We hope it will inform the Committee’s review of the government’s compliance with its obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (“the Covenant”). It has been seven years since Yemen last submitted its State Report to the Committee. During this time, the government has engaged in systematic violations of the Covenant, including extensive restrictions on the rights to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, and association, and the use of ill-treatment and unfair trials of political detainees. Yemen continues to have one of the highest execution rates in the world. The government dramatically intensified its targeting of human rights defenders and journalists during its suppression of a secessionist movement in the south starting in 2007, and during nationwide protests seeking the resignation of President Ali Abdullah Saleh in 2011. Yemen submitted its latest report to the Committee 14 months before the state’s security forces began a violent crackdown against largely peaceful demonstrators and opposition activists demanding the resignation of President Saleh.1 Attacks by pro-government gangs 1 Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 40 of the Covenant, Fifth periodic report of States parties, Yemen, CCPR/C/YEM/5, December 14, 2009, http://daccess-ods.un.org/TMP/8811841.01104736.html.
  • Boko Haram Beyond the Headlines: Analyses of Africa’S Enduring Insurgency

    Boko Haram Beyond the Headlines: Analyses of Africa’S Enduring Insurgency

    Boko Haram Beyond the Headlines: Analyses of Africa’s Enduring Insurgency Editor: Jacob Zenn Boko Haram Beyond the Headlines: Analyses of Africa’s Enduring Insurgency Jacob Zenn (Editor) Abdulbasit Kassim Elizabeth Pearson Atta Barkindo Idayat Hassan Zacharias Pieri Omar Mahmoud Combating Terrorism Center at West Point United States Military Academy www.ctc.usma.edu The views expressed in this report are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect those of the Combating Terrorism Center, United States Military Academy, Department of Defense, or U.S. Government. May 2018 Cover Photo: A group of Boko Haram fighters line up in this still taken from a propaganda video dated March 31, 2016. COMBATING TERRORISM CENTER ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Director The editor thanks colleagues at the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point (CTC), all of whom supported this endeavor by proposing the idea to carry out a LTC Bryan Price, Ph.D. report on Boko Haram and working with the editor and contributors to see the Deputy Director project to its rightful end. In this regard, I thank especially Brian Dodwell, Dan- iel Milton, Jason Warner, Kristina Hummel, and Larisa Baste, who all directly Brian Dodwell collaborated on the report. I also thank the two peer reviewers, Brandon Kend- hammer and Matthew Page, for their input and valuable feedback without which Research Director we could not have completed this project up to such a high standard. There were Dr. Daniel Milton numerous other leaders and experts at the CTC who assisted with this project behind-the-scenes, and I thank them, too. Distinguished Chair Most importantly, we would like to dedicate this volume to all those whose lives LTG (Ret) Dell Dailey have been afected by conflict and to those who have devoted their lives to seeking Class of 1987 Senior Fellow peace and justice.
  • IRAN COUNTRY of ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service

    IRAN COUNTRY of ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service

    IRAN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service Date 28 June 2011 IRAN JUNE 2011 Contents Preface Latest News EVENTS IN IRAN FROM 14 MAY TO 21 JUNE Useful news sources for further information REPORTS ON IRAN PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED BETWEEN 14 MAY AND 21 JUNE Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 1.01 Maps ...................................................................................................................... 1.04 Iran ..................................................................................................................... 1.04 Tehran ................................................................................................................ 1.05 Calendar ................................................................................................................ 1.06 Public holidays ................................................................................................... 1.07 2. ECONOMY ................................................................................................................ 2.01 3. HISTORY .................................................................................................................. 3.01 Pre 1979: Rule of the Shah .................................................................................. 3.01 From 1979 to 1999: Islamic Revolution to first local government elections ... 3.04 From 2000 to 2008: Parliamentary elections
  • Page9final.Qxd (Page 1)

    Page9final.Qxd (Page 1)

    DAILY EXCELSIOR, JAMMU WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 15, 2018 (PAGE 9) TENTH DAY KRIYA Sena flays Govt for not permitting Karni Sena stopped at Lakhanpur With profound grief and sorrow we inform Excelsior Correspondent at Lakhanpur by Kathua Police the sad and untimely demise of our beloved Lal Chowk flag hoisting led by DySP, Gourav Mahajan. Smt. Gouri Raina (Ganjoo) W/o Sh. KATHUA, Aug 14: A group They raised slogans while Makhan Lala Ganjoo R/o H.No. 11, Lane Excelsior Correspondent BJP is doing nothing while in of Karni Sena which reached Government and, is also not taking the National Flag in their No. 3, Anant Vihar Lale-Da-Bhag Jammu. here today from Jaipur, JAMMU, Aug 14: Shiv permitting our party leaders to hands and chanted Bharat Mata 10th Day Kriya will be performed on Rajasthan to hoist the National Sena (Bala Sahib Thackery) hoist National Flag at Lal Ki Jai. The Sandhya Rajput team 20.08.2018 (Monday) at Muthi Ghat at here today flayed the Central 8;30 AM. Chowk in Srinagar,” he main- * Watch video on leader took serious exception Government for not giving per- GRIEF STRICKEN tained. www.excelsiornews.com and criticized the administration Sh. Makhan Lala Ganjoo (Husband) mission to its leaders for unfurl- Kohli further said that NDA for not allowing them to march Flag at Lal Chowk, Srinagar in Sanjay Ganjoo & Seema Ganjoo (Son & Daughter-in-Law) Smt. Gouri Raina (Ganjoo) ing National Flag at Kashmir’s Government is appeasing sepa- towards the Lal Chowk Srinagar. Smt. Sunita Raina & P.N Raina (Daughter and Son - in - Law) Lal Chowk to celebrate ratists.
  • Situation of Human Rights in Yemen, Including Violations and Abuses Since September 2014

    Situation of Human Rights in Yemen, Including Violations and Abuses Since September 2014

    United Nations A/HRC/39/43* General Assembly Distr.: General 17 August 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty-ninth session 10–28 September 2018 Agenda items 2 and 10 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General Technical assistance and capacity-building Situation of human rights in Yemen, including violations and abuses since September 2014 Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights containing the findings of the Group of Eminent International and Regional Experts and a summary of technical assistance provided by the Office of the High Commissioner to the National Commission of Inquiry** Summary The present report is being submitted to the Human Rights Council in accordance with Council resolution 36/31. Part I of the report contains the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Group of Eminent International and Regional Experts on Yemen. Part II provides an account of the technical assistance provided by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to the National Commission of Inquiry into abuses and violations of human rights in Yemen. * Reissued for technical reasons on 27 September 2018. ** The annexes to the present report are circulated as received, in the language of submission only. GE.18-13655(E) A/HRC/39/43 Contents Page I. Findings of the Group of Eminent International and Regional Experts on Yemen ....................... 3 A. Introduction and mandate ....................................................................................................
  • World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development: 2017/2018 Global Report

    World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development: 2017/2018 Global Report

    Published in 2018 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 7, place de Fontenoy, 7523 Paris 07 SP, France © UNESCO and University of Oxford, 2018 ISBN 978-92-3-100242-7 Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/). By using the content of this publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repos- itory (http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en). The present license applies exclusively to the textual content of the publication. For the use of any material not clearly identi- fied as belonging to UNESCO, prior permission shall be requested from: [email protected] or UNESCO Publishing, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP France. Title: World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development: 2017/2018 Global Report This complete World Trends Report Report (and executive summary in six languages) can be found at en.unesco.org/world- media-trends-2017 The complete study should be cited as follows: UNESCO. 2018. World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development: 2017/2018 Global Report, Paris The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authori- ties, or concerning the delimiation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization.
  • In the Court of Appeal in the Cook Islands Held at Rarotonga (Civil Division)

    In the Court of Appeal in the Cook Islands Held at Rarotonga (Civil Division)

    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL IN THE COOK ISLANDS HELD AT RAROTONGA (CIVIL DIVISION) CA No. 4/14 IN THE MATTER of Sections 3, 9, 11 and 13 Declaratory Judgments Act 1994 AND IN THE MATTER of Cook Islands National Superannuation Fund Act 2000 and the Cook Islands Constitution BETWEEN MINISTER OF COOK ISLANDS NATIONAL SUPERANNUATION FUND Appellant AND ARORANGI TIMBERLAND LIMITED First Respondent AND ANDY OLAH Second Respondent AND MANEA FOODS Third Respondent AND BECO LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND JAMES BEER Fifth Respondent AND SUPER BROWN LIMITED Sixth Respondent AND RAINA TRADING LIMITED Seventh Respondent Coram: Williams P Barker JA Paterson JA Counsel: K Saunders (Solicitor-General) and M Ruffin for Appellant T Arnold for the Respondents Hearing: 9, 10, 11, 12 June 2014 Judgment: 17 November 2014 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT Solicitors: Crown Law Office for Appellant T Arnold for Respondents TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 The Origin of the Scheme ........................................................................................ 2 The Cook Islands National Superannuation Act 2000 ............................................. 3 The Trust Deed ....................................................................................................... 8 The Constitution of the Cook Islands .................................................................... 12 The Presumption of Constitutionality ...................................................................
  • Ccpnewsletter Aug07.Qxd (Page 1)

    Ccpnewsletter Aug07.Qxd (Page 1)

    “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” —Edmund Burke AUGUST 2007 Civil Courage VOL. 3, NO. 2 Steadfast Resistance to Evil at Great Personal Risk The Newsletter of The Train Foundation 67A East 77 Street,CCP New York, NY 10075 • Tel: 212.737.1011 • Fax: 212.737.6459 • www.civilcourageprize.org The Rev. Phillip Buck, formerly of North Korea, Wins 2007 Civil Courage Prize for Help to Fleeing Refugees Aided Thousands to Escape North Korea; Was Imprisoned by Chinese for 15 Months The Rev. Phillip Jun Buck, who was born in North Korea in 1941, has been selected as the winner of the 2007 Civil Courage Prize of The Train Foundation. He will be awarded the Prize of $50,000 at a ceremony to be held October 16 in New York. His life has been marked by tireless efforts to help refugees from North Korea to escape that country, many through China, which, contrary to international law,tracks down and repatriates refugees. Since Pyong Yang deems it a crime to leave the country,the refugees returned by China are treated as criminals, and are subject to imprisonment in a gulag or worse. China persecutes those who aid refugees, as well. Rev. Buck himself was arrested in Yanji, China in May 2005, while aiding refugees, and spent 15 months in prison there.Thanks to the U.S. Embassy,his case was kept before the Chinese authorities and he was released in August 2006, though he suffered from malnutrition, intense interrogation and sleep deprivation.
  • Tides of Violence: Mapping the Sri Lankan Conflict from 1983 to 2009 About the Public Interest Advocacy Centre

    Tides of Violence: Mapping the Sri Lankan Conflict from 1983 to 2009 About the Public Interest Advocacy Centre

    Tides of violence: mapping the Sri Lankan conflict from 1983 to 2009 About the Public Interest Advocacy Centre The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) is an independent, non-profit legal centre based in Sydney. Established in 1982, PIAC tackles barriers to justice and fairness experienced by people who are vulnerable or facing disadvantage. We ensure basic rights are enjoyed across the community through legal assistance and strategic litigation, public policy development, communication and training. 2nd edition May 2019 Contact: Public Interest Advocacy Centre Level 5, 175 Liverpool St Sydney NSW 2000 Website: www.piac.asn.au Public Interest Advocacy Centre @PIACnews The Public Interest Advocacy Centre office is located on the land of the Gadigal of the Eora Nation. TIDES OF VIOLENCE: MAPPING THE SRI LANKAN CONFLICT FROM 1983 TO 2009 03 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 09 Background to CMAP .............................................................................................................................................09 Report overview .......................................................................................................................................................09 Key violation patterns in each time period ......................................................................................................09 24 July 1983 – 28 July 1987 .................................................................................................................................10