DOCSLIB.ORG

Development Team

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development Team Paper No. : 08 Human Population Genetics Module : 24 Classification of Indian Population Development Team Prof. Anup Kumar Kapoor Principal Investigator Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Paper Coordinator Prof. Gautam K. Kshatriya Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Content Writer Gangaina Kameih Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Content Reviewer Prof. A.Paparao Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh 1 Human Population Genetics Anthropology Classification of Indian Population Description of Module Subject Name Anthropology Paper Name 08 Human Population Genetics Module Name/Title Classification of Indian Population Module Id 24 2 Human Population Genetics Anthropology Classification of Indian Population Learning outcomes After studying this module: You shall be able to understand the human typology i.e. morphological and genetical trait that can be used in classifying the population. You would learn and identify the Indian population given by different Anthropologists. You would understand the criticism made by many people based on the given classified Indian population. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Criteria for Human typology 3. Contribution to the classification of Indian population 3.1. Risley’s (1915) classification 3.2. Giufrida (1921) classification 3.3. A.C.Haddon (1924) classification 3.4. Eickstedt (1934) classification 3.5. B.S. Guha (1931) classification 3.6. S.S. Sarkar (1954) classification 4. Criticism from different Anthropologists 5. Summary 3 Human Population Genetics Anthropology Classification of Indian Population 1. Introduction Throughout the globe there is abundant human variation, inhabitants of different countries are more or less distinct both physically and culturally. This rule of geographic diversity is applicable to animals, plants as well as humans. Homo sapiens are a polytypic species with unique evolutionary pattern. Polytypism in fact is the variability between populations or groups. It is different from polymorphism, which is the variability within populations. But polymorphism serves as a store of genetic raw material for the origin of polytypism. Geographic races are mendelian populations of a species that inhabit different territories and they differ in the incidence of some genes or alleles in their gene pool (B.R.K.Shukla and Sudha Rastogi. 2008). The main responsible for the formation of races are mutation, natural selection, genetic drift, migration, isolation, hybridization, sexual selection and social selection (B.M.Das.2004). Hooton defined “race” as a great division of mankind, the members of which, though individually varying are characterized as a group by a certain combination of morphological and metrical features, principally non-adaptive, which have been derived from their common descent. Different anthropologists have proposed different classifications of mankind. However, it could be said that there are three major races of man. These are Negroid, Caucasoid and mongoloid. Some anthropologists want to call the Australoids a separate major racial group. In that case there are four major races. All anthropologists have agreed that each of the major races can be divided into certain groups or subgroups (B.M.Das.2004). Indian population comprising of more than a billion people consists of 4,693 communities with several thousands of endogamous groups, 325 functioning languages and 25 scripts (Singh 2002). In some geographical regions of India, inbreeding is practiced. The population inbreeding coefficient in India varies from 0.00 to 0.20 (Rao 1984; Malhotra and Vasulu 1993; Bittles and Neel 1994). Besides different waves of migration has led to admixture of different ethnic groups, cultures and languages with the native population, thereby contributing significantly to the present day gene pool of the subcontinent (Sankalia 1974; Allchin and Allchin 1982; Bhasin et al. 1994; Gadgil et al 1998). With the exception of Africa, such an extent of genetic diversity is not observed in comparable global regions (Majumdar 1998). Indian population can be, to a large extent, substructured on the basis of their ethnic origin as well as linguistic lineages. All the four major morphological types-Caucasoid, Mongoloid, Australoid and Negrito are present in Indian population (Malhotra 1978). The Caucasoid and Mongoloid populations are mainly concentrated in the north and northeastern parts of India. The Australoids are mostly confined to the central, western and Southern India, while the Negritos are restricted only to the Andaman Islands (Cavallisforza et al. 1994). Linguistically, Indian population belongs to four major language families: Indo-European, Dravidian, Tibeto-Burman and Austro- Asiatic. The Indo-European and Dravidian languages are spoken in the northern and southern parts of India, respectively (Gadgil et al.1998). The Tibeto-Burman speakers are concentrated in the north 4 Human Population Genetics Anthropology Classification of Indian Population eastern parts of the country. The Austro-Asiatic speakers are exclusively tribals and are dispersed mostly in the central and eastern parts of India. Molecular diversity studies have revealed that Austro- Asiatic speakers are likely to have been the most ancient inhabitants of India (Majumdar 2001; Roychoudhury et al.2001). After Risley’s classification of the people of India, more attempts have been contributed by different people in the classification of Indian population. Each classification has been attempted in a specific manner. Indian classification given by Risley (1915), Giufrida (1921), A.C.Haddon (1924), Eickstedt (1934), B.S. Guha (1931) and S.S. Sarkar (1954) have been discussed below accordingly. 2. Criteria for Human typology Ever since the recognition of human variability, attempts have been made to understand not only the extent of variability but also to decipher groups of humans having characteristics features peculiar to them. The questions of a broadly acceptable and clear cut classification of mankind have engaged the attention of anthropologist in general and physical anthropologist in particular. Consequently, the earlier anthropological literature is largely devoted to an evaluation and assessment of observable somatic characteristics like skin color, hair form, texture and color, head shape, nose form, etc. Before such criteria were used only for the purpose of human taxonomy. Later it was realized that these observable traits by and large are not objective, as the observers are likely to make different interpretations and categorizations of a particular observation say skin color or hair form etc. With this realization, emphasis gradually shifted to such trait which can be measured and reduce to mathematical expression and that is how the somatic measurements came to be considered as criteria for human typology. This naturally resulted into a critical evaluation of the techniques of measurement and their standardizations. It was believed that accurate measurements would enable us to work out better and dependable classification of the human species, and also help in understanding the process of human evolution. Therefore, volumes of literature appeared on this subject and morphological and metric traits continued to be used extensively. After the introduction of the genetics and the availability of the details of such genetical characteristics as blood groups, physical anthropologist could not stop the temptation of using genetical characteristics in ethnic discrimination. With more clarifications and realizations of the better dependability of genetical traits, gradually the emphasis changed in their favor and they were adopted in human taxonomic studies. Today, we know that numerous genetic characteristics with known mode to inheritance are being used as criteria for human typology. Thus we find that broadly speaking, the characteristics that may be used for the establishment of physical grouping of mankind are either morphological or genetical or both (Fig. 3). Figure 3: Morphological and genetical traits of the three major races of man Physical Caucasoid Negroid Mongoloid characteristics 5 Human Population Genetics Anthropology Classification of Indian Population 1.Head form Long to broad and Predominantly long Predominantly broad short 2.Head height Medium to very high Low to medium Medium 3.prognathism None Marked Medium to slight (projection of jaws) 4.Face Narrow to medium, Medium, broad to Medium broad to very broad, tends to be narrow tends to be broad, medium high, high medium high cheek bones tend to be high and flat 5.Nose Form Narrow to medium Medium broad to Medium broad to vey broad broad Low Low to medium Bridge High Straight or concave Usually concave Profile Straight, concave or convex 6.Chin Usually projecting Slight medium 7.Eye Color Light blue to dark Dark brown to brown Brown to brown brown black and black Lateral fold Vertical fold common Form of lids Medium epicanthic occasional fold 8.Lips Very thin to medium, Thick, much aversion Medium thickness small aversion with aversion of membranous of often heavy integumented lips 9.Skin color Plate reddish, white to Brown, yellow brown Saffron to yellow olive brown to brown to brown brown, some reddish 6 Human Population Genetics Anthropology Classification of Indian Population black brown 10.Hair Head hair Light blown to dark Dark brown to black Brown to brown Color brown Black Black Texture fine to medium Course Coarse Form straight to wavy Light curl to wavy Straight
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Série Antropologia 103 Three Essays on Anthropology in India
    Universidade de Brasília Instituto de Ciências Humanas Departamento de Antropologia 70910.900 – Brasília, DF Fone: +55 61 3307 3006 Série Antropologia 103 Three essays on anthropology in India Mariza Peirano This issue brings together the translation into English of numbers 57, 65 and 83 of Série Antropologia. The present title replaces the former “Towards Anthropo- logical Reciprocity”, its designation from 1990 to 2010. 1990 Table of contents Introduction .............................................................................. 2 Acknowledgements .................................................................. 7 Paper 1: On castes and villages: reflections on a debate.............. 8 Paper 2: “Are you catholic?” Travel report, theoretical reflections and ethical perplexities ………………….. 26 Paper 3: Anthropological debates: the India – Europe dialogue ...................................................... 54 1 Introduction The three papers brought together in this volume of Série Antropologia were translated from Portuguese into English especially to make them available for an audience of non- Brazilian anthropologists and sociologists. The papers were written with the hope that a comparison of the Brazilian with the Indian academic experience could enlarge our understanding of the social, historical and cultural implications of the development of anthropology in different contexts. This project started in the late 1970’s when, as a graduate student at Harvard University, I decided to take a critical look at the dilemmas that face
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Characteristics of Tribal Communities That Call Themselves Hindu
    Socio-economic Characteristics of Tribal Communities That Call Themselves Hindu Vinay Kumar Srivastava Religious and Development Research Programme Working Paper Series Indian Institute of Dalit Studies New Delhi 2010 Foreword Development has for long been viewed as an attractive and inevitable way forward by most countries of the Third World. As it was initially theorised, development and modernisation were multifaceted processes that were to help the “underdeveloped” economies to take-off and eventually become like “developed” nations of the West. Processes like industrialisation, urbanisation and secularisation were to inevitably go together if economic growth had to happen and the “traditional” societies to get out of their communitarian consciousness, which presumably helped in sustaining the vicious circles of poverty and deprivation. Tradition and traditional belief systems, emanating from past history or religious ideologies, were invariably “irrational” and thus needed to be changed or privatised. Developed democratic regimes were founded on the idea of a rational individual citizen and a secular public sphere. Such evolutionist theories of social change have slowly lost their appeal. It is now widely recognised that religion and cultural traditions do not simply disappear from public life. They are also not merely sources of conservation and stability. At times they could also become forces of disruption and change. The symbolic resources of religion, for example, are available not only to those in power, but also to the weak, who sometimes deploy them in their struggles for a secure and dignified life, which in turn could subvert the traditional or establish structures of authority. Communitarian identities could be a source of security and sustenance for individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Diversity of Four Filipino Negrito Populations From
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Commons@Wayne State University Human Biology Volume 85 Issue 1 Special Issue on Revisiting the "Negrito" Article 9 Hypothesis 2013 Genetic Diversity of Four Filipino Negrito Populations from Luzon: Comparison of Male and Female Effective Population Sizes and Differential Integration of Immigrants into Aeta and Agta Communities E Heyer EcoAnthropologie et Ethnobiologie, MNHN, CNRS, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France, [email protected] M Georges EcoAnthropologie et Ethnobiologie, MNHN, CNRS, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France M Pachner Andaman and Nicobar Association, Liestal, Switzerland P Endicott EcoAnthropologie et Ethnobiologie, MNHN, CNRS, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol Part of the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons, and the Genetics and Genomics Commons Recommended Citation Heyer, E; Georges, M; Pachner, M; and Endicott, P (2013) "Genetic Diversity of Four Filipino Negrito Populations from Luzon: Comparison of Male and Female Effective Population Sizes and Differential Integration of Immigrants into Aeta and Agta Communities," Human Biology: Vol. 85: Iss. 1, Article 9. Available at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol/vol85/iss1/9 Genetic Diversity of Four Filipino Negrito Populations from Luzon: Comparison of Male and Female Effective Population Sizes and Differential Integration of Immigrants into Aeta and Agta Communities Abstract Genetic data corresponding to four negrito populations (two Aeta and two Agta; n = 120) from the Luzon region of the Philippines have been analyzed. These data comprise mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) hypervariable segment 1 haplotypes and haplogroups, Y-chromosome haplogroups and short tandem repeats (STRs), autosomal STRs, and X-chromosome STRs.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Non-Existence of "Dravidian Kinship"
    Edinburgh Papers In South Asian Studies Number 6, (1996) _____________________________________________________________________________ On the Non-Existence of "Dravidian Kinship" Anthony Good Social Anthropology School of Social & Political Studies University of Edinburgh For further information about the Centre and its activities, please contact the Convenor Centre for South Asian Studies, School of Social & Political Studies, University of Edinburgh, 55 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LL. e-mail: [email protected] web page: www.ed.ac.uk/sas/ ISBN: 1 900 795 05 1 Paper Price: £2 inc. postage and packing On the Non–Existence of “Dravidian Kinship”* Anthony Good The proposition underlying this paper is a simple one, namely, that there is no such thing as the Dravidian kinship system. Naturally, such a stark statement requires a great deal of qualification and explanation if it is to represent anything more than gratuitous iconoclasm. I shall try to satisfy that requirement in three ways, as follows. Empirically, I shall show using published ethnographic evidence that the great majority of Dravidian speakers in South Asia do not have a Dravidian kinship system as conventionally defined. Neither the relationship terminology nor the preferential marriage rules are in fact as they have been conventionally represented. Rather more briefly, I shall also claim that, taxonomically, “the Dravidian kinship system” forms one element in an inadequately constructed typology of kinship systems; while, theoretically, the notion of a “kinship system” leads to an overly static analysis, and involves an unacceptable degree of reification. First, however, it is necessary to say something about the nature of kinship, and explain why there is nonetheless an over–riding need to grasp it as a whole – though as a totality rather than as a system.
    [Show full text]
  • MAN-001 Social Anthropology Indira Gandhi National Open University School of Social Sciences
    MAN-001 Social Anthropology Indira Gandhi National Open University School of Social Sciences Block 1 INTRODUCTION TO SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY UNIT 1 Social Anthropology: Nature and Scope 5 UNIT 2 Philosophical and Historical Foundations of Social Anthropology 20 UNIT 3 Relationship of Social Anthropology with Allied Disciplines 30 Expert Committee Professor I J S Bansal Professor V.K.Srivastava Dr. S.M. Patnaik Retired, Department of Principal, Hindu College Associate Professor Human Biology University of Delhi Department of Anthropology Punjabi University, Patiala Delhi University of Delhi Delhi Professor K K Misra Professor Sudhakar Rao Director Department of Anthropology Dr. Manoj Kumar Singh Indira Gandhi Rashtriya University of Hyderabad Assistant Professor Manav Sangrahalaya Hyderabad Department of Anthropology Bhopal University of Delhi Professor. Subhadra M. Delhi Professor Ranjana Ray Channa Retired, Department of Department of Anthropology Faculty of Anthropology Anthropology University of Delhi SOSS, IGNOU Calcutta University, Kolkata Delhi Dr. Rashmi Sinha Professor P. Chengal Reddy Professor P Vijay Prakash Reader Retired, Department of Department of Anthropology Anthropology Andhra University Dr. Mitoo Das S V University, Tirupati Visakhapatnam Assistant Professor Professor R. K. Pathak Dr. Nita Mathur Dr. Rukshana Zaman Department of Anthropology Associate Professor Assistant Professor Panjab University Faculty of Sociology Dr. P. Venkatrama Chandigarh School of Social Sciences Assistant Professor Indira Gandhi National Open Professor A K Kapoor University, New Delhi Dr. K. Anil Kumar Department of Anthropology Assistant Professor University of Delhi, Delhi Programme Coordinator: Dr. Rashmi Sinha, IGNOU, New Delhi Course Coordinator : Dr. Rukshana Zaman, IGNOU, New Delhi Block Preparation Team Unit Writers Unit 3 Content Editor Unit 1 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume Xxiii
    ANTHROPOLOGICAL PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY VOLUME XXIII NEW YORK PUBLISHED BY ORDER OF THE TRUSTEES 1925 Editor CLARK WISSLER FOREWORD Louis ROBERT SULLIVAN Since this volume is largely the work of the late Louis Robert Sulli- van, a biographical sketch of this able anthropologist, will seem a fitting foreword. Louis Robert Sullivan was born at Houlton, Maine, May 21, 1892. He was educated in the public schools of Houlton and was graduated from Bates College, Lewiston, Maine, in 1914. During the following academic year he taught in a high school and on November 24, 1915, he married Bessie Pearl Pathers of Lewiston, Maine. He entered Brown University as a graduate student and was assistant in zoology under Professor H. E. Walters, and in 1916 received the degree of master of arts. From Brown University Mr. Sullivan came to the American Mu- seum of Natural History, as assistant in physical anthropology, and during the first years of his connection with the Museum he laid the foundations for his future work in human biology, by training in general anatomy with Doctor William K. Gregory and Professor George S. Huntington and in general anthropology with Professor Franz Boas. From the very beginning, he showed an aptitude for research and he had not been long at the Museum ere he had published several important papers. These activities were interrupted by our entrance into the World War. Mr. Sullivan was appointed a First Lieutenant in the Section of Anthropology, Surgeon-General's Office in 1918, and while on duty at headquarters asisted in the compilation of the reports on Defects found in Drafted Men and Army Anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Anthropology
    INDIAN ANTHROPOLOGY HISTORY OF ANTHROPOLOGY IN INDIA Dr. Abhik Ghosh Senior Lecturer, Department of Anthropology Panjab University, Chandigarh CONTENTS Introduction: The Growth of Indian Anthropology Arthur Llewellyn Basham Christoph Von-Fuhrer Haimendorf Verrier Elwin Rai Bahadur Sarat Chandra Roy Biraja Shankar Guha Dewan Bahadur L. K. Ananthakrishna Iyer Govind Sadashiv Ghurye Nirmal Kumar Bose Dhirendra Nath Majumdar Iravati Karve Hasmukh Dhirajlal Sankalia Dharani P. Sen Mysore Narasimhachar Srinivas Shyama Charan Dube Surajit Chandra Sinha Prabodh Kumar Bhowmick K. S. Mathur Lalita Prasad Vidyarthi Triloki Nath Madan Shiv Raj Kumar Chopra Andre Beteille Gopala Sarana Conclusions Suggested Readings SIGNIFICANT KEYWORDS: Ethnology, History of Indian Anthropology, Anthropological History, Colonial Beginnings INTRODUCTION: THE GROWTH OF INDIAN ANTHROPOLOGY Manu’s Dharmashastra (2nd-3rd century BC) comprehensively studied Indian society of that period, based more on the morals and norms of social and economic life. Kautilya’s Arthashastra (324-296 BC) was a treatise on politics, statecraft and economics but also described the functioning of Indian society in detail. Megasthenes was the Greek ambassador to the court of Chandragupta Maurya from 324 BC to 300 BC. He also wrote a book on the structure and customs of Indian society. Al Biruni’s accounts of India are famous. He was a 1 Persian scholar who visited India and wrote a book about it in 1030 AD. Al Biruni wrote of Indian social and cultural life, with sections on religion, sciences, customs and manners of the Hindus. In the 17th century Bernier came from France to India and wrote a book on the life and times of the Mughal emperors Shah Jahan and Aurangzeb, their life and times.
    [Show full text]
  • Performing Blackness in the Danza De Caporales
    Roper, Danielle. 2019. Blackface at the Andean Fiesta: Performing Blackness in the Danza de Caporales. Latin American Research Review 54(2), pp. 381–397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.300 OTHER ARTS AND HUMANITIES Blackface at the Andean Fiesta: Performing Blackness in the Danza de Caporales Danielle Roper University of Chicago, US [email protected] This study assesses the deployment of blackface in a performance of the Danza de Caporales at La Fiesta de la Virgen de la Candelaria in Puno, Peru, by the performance troupe Sambos Illimani con Sentimiento y Devoción. Since blackface is so widely associated with the nineteenth- century US blackface minstrel tradition, this article develops the concept of “hemispheric blackface” to expand common understandings of the form. It historicizes Sambos’ deployment of blackface within an Andean performance tradition known as the Tundique, and then traces the way multiple hemispheric performance traditions can converge in a single blackface act. It underscores the amorphous nature of blackface itself and critically assesses its role in producing anti-blackness in the performance. Este ensayo analiza el uso de “blackface” (literalmente, cara negra: término que designa el uso de maquillaje negro cubriendo un rostro de piel más pálida) en la Danza de Caporales puesta en escena por el grupo Sambos Illimani con Sentimiento y Devoción que tuvo lugar en la fiesta de la Virgen de la Candelaria en Puno, Perú. Ya que el “blackface” es frecuentemente asociado a una tradición estadounidense del siglo XIX, este artículo desarrolla el concepto de “hemispheric blackface” (cara-negra hemisférica) para dar cuenta de elementos comunes en este género escénico.
    [Show full text]
  • QUEENBALA MARAK © Queenbala Marak
    Editor QUEENBALA MARAK © Queenbala Marak Edition: 2016 ISBN: 978-81-8387-672-8 Cover image: Mitoo Das All rights reserved with the Publisher, including the right to translate or reproduce this book or parts there of except for brief quotations in critical articles or reviews. SERIALS PUBLICATIONS (P) LTD. 4830/24, Prahlad Street, Ansari Road Darya Ganj, New Delhi-110002 (India) Phone : 23245225, 23272135 E-mail: [email protected] 21 BHAJI ON THE BEACH: RELATIONAL ETHICS IN PRACTICE SALMA SIDDIQUE Light comes to us by the sensibility. Without visual sensibility there is no light, no movement. Robert Delaunay, Light (1912) This chapter explores the relational ethics of how meaning is made through the reflexive process of judgments about existential life positions which create moral identities by our actions in the world. I will examine how this moral identity can emerge through using stories as a “social (re)membering”. It is in the act of social remembering, recognition and regret where Freud (1962) and Nietzsche (1994) argue that morality acts as “the ethics of care” and as a societial mechanism of obligation. Morality serves to legitimatize the social structures and institutions of co-created roles and expected behaviours. The individual develops ways of being to compensate for frustrations and uncertainty. Nietzsche (1994) explores this tension between the psychological need and the rationalizion of behaviour as moralised actions and sees this experience as the individual’s attempt to impose one’s will within a socio-economic context. I will attempt to explore relational ethics by examining the performative aspects of teaching relational ethics through interpersonal relationships between self and other.
    [Show full text]
  • The People of India
    LIBRARY ANNFX 2 CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY ^% Cornell University Library DS 421.R59 1915 The people of India 3 1924 024 114 773 Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924024114773 THE PEOPLE OF INDIA =2!^.^ Z'^JiiS- ,SIH HERBERT ll(i 'E MISLEX, K= CoIoB a , ( THE PEOPLE OF INDIA w SIR HERBERT RISLEY, K.C.I.E., C.S.I. DIRECTOR OF ETHNOGRAPHY FOR INDIA, OFFICIER d'aCADEMIE, FRANCE, CORRESPONDING MEMBER OF THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL SOCIETIES OF ROME AND BERLIN, AND OF THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND SECOND EDITION, EDITED BY W. CROOKE, B.A. LATE OF THE INDIAN CIVIL SERVICE "/« ^ood sooth, 7tiy masters, this is Ho door. Yet is it a little window, that looketh upon a great world" WITH 36 ILLUSTRATIONS AND AN ETHNOLOGICAL MAP OF INDIA UN31NDABL? Calcutta & Simla: THACKER, SPINK & CO. London: W, THACKER & CO., 2, Creed Lane, E.C. 191S PRINTED BY WILLIAM CLOWES AND SONS, LIMITED, LONDON AND BECCLES. e 7/ /a£ gw TO SIR WILLIAM TURNER, K.C.B. CHIEF AMONG ENGLISH CRANIOLOGISTS THIS SLIGHT SKETCH OF A LARGE SUBJECT IS WITH HIS PERMISSION RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION In an article on "Magic and Religion" published in the Quarterly Review of last July, Mr. Edward Clodd complains that certain observations of mine on the subject of " the impersonal stage of religion " are hidden away under the " prosaic title " of the Report on the Census of India, 1901.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology and GIS: Temporal and Spatial Distribution of the Philippine Negrito Groups Sabino G
    Human Biology Volume 85 Issue 1 Special Issue on Revisiting the "Negrito" Article 10 Hypothesis 2013 Anthropology and GIS: Temporal and Spatial Distribution of the Philippine Negrito Groups Sabino G. Padilla Jr Department of Behavioral Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, University of the Philippines, Manila Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol Part of the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Padilla, Sabino G. Jr (2013) "Anthropology and GIS: Temporal and Spatial Distribution of the Philippine Negrito Groups," Human Biology: Vol. 85: Iss. 1, Article 10. Available at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol/vol85/iss1/10 Anthropology and GIS: Temporal and Spatial Distribution of the Philippine Negrito Groups Abstract The hiP lippine "negrito" groups comprise a diverse group of populations speaking over 30 different languages, who are spread all over the archipelago, mostly in marginal areas of Luzon Island in the north, the central Visayas islands, and Mindanao in the south. They exhibit physical characteristics that are different from more than 100 Philippine ethnolinguistic groups that are categorized as non-negritos. Given their numbers, it is not surprising that Philippine negritos make up a major category in a number of general ethnographic maps produced since the nineteenth century. Reports from various ethnological surveys during this period, however, have further enriched our understanding regarding the extent and distribution of negrito populations. Using the data contained in these reports, it is possible to plot and create a map showing the historical locations and distribution of negrito groups. Using geographic information systems (GIS), the location and distribution of negrito groups at any given time can be overlaid on historical or current maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Human Races in the World (Classification of Human Races ) Dr
    GEOG- CC-13 M.A. Semester III ©Dr. Supriya e-text Paper-CC12 (U-III) Human and Social Geography Major Human races in The World (Classification of Human Races ) Dr. Supriya Assistant Professor (Guest) Ph. D: Geography; M.A. in Geography Post Doc. Fellow (ICSSR), UGC- NET-JRF Department of Geography Patna University, Patna Mob: 9006640841 Email: [email protected] Content Writer & Affiliation Dr Supriya, Asst. Professor (Guest), Patna University Subject Name Geography Paper Code CC-12 Paper Name Human and Social Geography Title of Topic Classification of Human Races Objectives To understand the concept of race and Examined the different views about classification of human races in the World Keywords Races, Caucasoid, Mongoloid, Negroid GEOG- CC-13 M.A. Semester III ©Dr. Supriya Classification of Human Races Dr. Supriya Concept of Race: A Race may be defined as division of mankind into classes of individuals possessing common physical characteristics, traits, appearance that is transmissible by descents & sufficient to characterize it as a distinct human type. Race is a biological grouping within human species distinguished or classified according to genetically transmitted differences. Anthropologists define race as a principal division of mankind, marked by physical characteristics that breed. According to Vidal de la Blache: “A race is great divisions of mankind, the members of which though individually vary, are characterized as a group by certain body characteristics as a group by certain body characteristics which are transmitted by nature & retained from one generation to another”. Race is a biological concept. The term race should not be used in connection with those grouping of mankind such as nation, religion, community & language which depends on feelings, ideas or habits of people and can be changes by the conscious wishes of the individual.
    [Show full text]