Kirovohrad Oblast Q2 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kirovohrad Oblast Q2 2020 Results of surveysBusiness of Vinnits Outlooka regionSurvey * enterprises managersof Kirovohrad regarding Oblast their business expectations * I квартал 2018Q року2 20 20 This survey was conducted after the government announced it would relax the quarantine *Надані результати*This є surveyвідображенням only reflects лише the opinionsдумки респондентів of respondents – inкерівників Kirovohrad підприємств oblast (top manageВінницькоїrs of області в IІ кварталіcompanies) 2018 року who і wereне є прогнозамиpolled in Q2 та20 20оцінками, and does Національного not represent банку NBU forecastsУкраїни. or estimates Business Outlook Survey of Kirovohrad Oblast Q2 2020 A survey of companies carried out in Kirovohrad oblast in Q2 2020 showed that respondents expected a drop in the output of Ukrainian goods and services and weaker performance of their companies over the next 12 months on the back of the quarantine. Respondents expected that prices would increase. Depreciation expectations softened.1 The top managers of companies said they expected that over the next 12 months: . the output of Ukrainian goods and services would drop: the balance of expectations was (-30.8%) compared to (-18.2%) in Q1 2020 and (-34.1%) across Ukraine (Figure 1) . prices for consumer goods and services would grow: 53.8% of respondents expected the inflation rate to be lower than 7.5% (compared with 54.9% across Ukraine). Respondents referred to production costs as the main inflation driver (Figure 2) . the domestic currency would gradually depreciate more slowly : 46.2% of respondents (compared with 50.0% in the previous quarter) expected the hryvnia to weaken against the US dollar, with a figure of 68.2% across Ukraine . the financial and economic standings of their companies would deteriorate: the balance of expectations was (-15.4%) compared with (-8.3%) in the previous quarter and (-1.8%) across Ukraine (see Table) . total sales would decrease: the balance of responses was (-23.1%) compared with (-16.7%) in the previous quarter. Respondents also expected a decrease in external sales (the balance of responses was (-25.0%) compared with 0.0% in Q1 2020). Overall, companies across Ukraine expected sales to decrease only slightly, the balances of responses being (-0.1%) and (-0.7)% respectively . investment both in construction and in machinery, equipment and tools would decrease: the balances of responses were (-38.5%) and (-30.8%) respectively (compared to (-37.5%) and (-9.1%) in Q1 2020). Across Ukraine, the balances of responses were (-16.1%) and (-10.5%) respectively . staff numbers at their companies would drop noticeably: the balance of responses was (-41.7%) compared with (- 8.3%) in Q1 2020 and (-17.3%) across Ukraine (Figure 4) . both purchase and selling prices would rise at a faster pace: the balances of responses were 76.9% and 38.5% respectively (compared to 50.0% and 16.7% in Q1 2020) (Figure 6). Respondents cited raw material and supplies prices as the main selling price driver. The impact of domestic competition strengthened noticeably (Figure 7). per-unit production costs and wage costs per staff member would increase at a slower pace: the balance of responses was 30.8% for each (compared with 36.4% and 50.0% in Q1 2020) (Figures 6 and 4). The political situation and weak demand were cited as the main drags on the ability of companies to boost production. The impact of weak demand strengthened noticeably (Figure 5). Respondents lowered their expectations of an increase in borrowing needs in the near future (Figure 8). The respondents who planned to take out corporate loans (38.5% of respondents) usually opted for domestic currency loans. Respondents said that lending standards had remained unchanged (Figure 9). Respondents continued to cite high loan rates as the main factor that deterred them from taking out loans (Figure 10). The impact of uncertainty about ability to meet debt obligations as they fall due strengthened noticeably All of the respondents said that they had encountered no difficulties in effecting transactions with funds deposited in bank accounts (96.5% across Ukraine). Assessments of financial and economic standings as of the time of the survey (Figure 3) . The current financial and economic standings of companies had been assessed as bad for three quarters in a row: the balance of responses was (-23.1%) compared with (-8.3%) in Q1 2020 and (-11.6%) across Ukraine. Finished goods stocks had increased and were assessed at a level higher than the normal one: the balance of responses was 12.5% compared with 0.0% in Q1 2020. Companies were operating on the verge of their production capacity: the balance of responses was 0.0% compared with 16.7% in Q1 2020. 1 This survey was conducted after the government announced it would relax the quarantine 2 Business Outlook Survey of Kirovohrad Oblast Q2 2020 Survey Details2,3 Respondents in terms of main economic Respondents in terms of enterprise size based Respondents in terms of business activities, % on staff number, % activities,% Other Exporters only 7.7 Transport and Large (more 15.4 Small (up to 50 communications Agriculture than 250 Neither exporters persons) 7.7 38.5 persons) nor importers 46.2 23.1 61.5 Imports only 7.7 Wholesale and retail trade Both exporters 23.1 and importers 15.4 Medium (from 51 and up Mining to 250 persons) Manufacturing 7.7 30.8 15.4 . Period: 5 through 29 May 2020. A total of 13 companies were polled. A representative sample was generated on the basis of the agricultural sector. Business outlook index for next 12 months in terms of regions,% Business Outlook Index for Next 12 Months in Terms of Regions4, % Riv ne Oblast Voly n Oblast Chernihiv Oblast 103.1 90.5 Zhy tomyr 85.5 Sumy Oblast Oblast 87.1 125.7 Ky iv and Lv iv Oblast Ky iv Oblast Poltav a Oblast Kharkiv Oblast 105.0 Ternopil Oblast 92.4 81.4 92.1 97.8 Khmelny tskyi Cherkasy Luhansk Oblast Iv ano-Frankivsk Oblast Vinny tsia Oblast Zakarpattia Oblast 89.8 Oblast 102.0 Oblast 93.2 no data 70.9 Donetsk 99.5 Cherniv tsi Oblast Kirov ohrad Oblast Dnipropetrov sk Oblast Oblast 86.7 70.1 85.7 no data Zaporizhia My kolaiv Oblast Odesa 58.8 Oblast Oblast 95.6 88.9 Kherson Oblast 101.5 minimum 58.8 1 quartile 86.0 1 quarter 2 quartile (median) 91.3 Crimea 2 quarter 3 quartile 99.0 no data 3 quarter maximum 125.7 4 quarter Ukraine 90.8 *a quartile is the v alue of the BOI where an ordered sample is div ided into f our equal-sized subgroups **a median is the v alue of the BOI in the middle of an ordered sampled where the sample is div ided into two equal-sized subgroups Table. The Business Outlook Index of Companies in Kirovohrad Oblast and Its Components Balances of responses, % Expectations over next 12 months for Q2 19 Q3 19 Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Financial and economic standings 0.0 31.3 -7.1 -8.3 -15.4 Total sales 20.0 18.8 -20.0 -16.7 -23.1 Investment in construction -7.1 -35.7 -28.6 -37.5 -38.5 Investment in machinery, equipment and tools 0.0 -13.3 7.1 -9.1 -30.8 Staff numbers -20.0 -25.0 -33.3 -8.3 -41.7 2 This sample was generated in proportion to the contribution of each region and each economic activity to Ukraine’s gross value added. 3 Data for totals and components may be subject to rounding effects. 4 The business outlook index (BOI) is an aggregate indicator for expected business performance over the next 12 months. It is calculated using the balances of respondents' responses regarding changes in the financial and economic standings of their companies and future economic activity. 3 Business Outlook Survey of Kirovohrad Oblast Q2 2020 Figure 1 Figure 2 Output expectations for next 12 months, Assessment of consumer price drivers, percentage of responses percentage of responses 100 100 0 20 40 60 80 80 80 Production costs 60 60 Exchange rate 40 40 20 20 Household income 0 0 -20 -20 Global prices -40 -40 Q2 19 Q3 19 Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Supply (availability) of Output will decrease money Output will be unchanged Output will increase Tax changes Balance of expectations (right scale) Q2 20 Q1 20 Budgetary social spending Figure 3 Figure 4 Economic activity as of the time of the survey, Staff level and wage cost expectations for next 12 balance of responses months, balance of responses 30 60 20 40 10 20 0 0 -10 -20 -20 -40 -30 Q2 19 Q3 19 Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 -60 Financial and economic standings Q2 19 Q3 19 Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Finished goods stocks Staff level expectations Wage costs per staff member Unutilized production capacity Figure 5 Figure 6 Assessment of factors that impede output Expectations of producer prices for next 12 growth, percentage of responses months, balance of responses 0 20 40 60 100 Political situation Weak demand 80 Lack of working assets 60 Qualified staff shortage High raw material and 40 supplies prices Exchange rate fluctuations 20 Tax burden High energy prices 0 Q2 19 Q3 19 Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Insufficient production capacity Purchase prices Selling prices Corruption Per-unit production costs Regulatory burden Q2 20 Q1 20 Limited availability of loan 4 Business Outlook Survey of Kirovohrad Oblast Q2 2020 Figure 7 Figure 8 Expectations of borrowing needs and intentions to Assessment of selling price drivers, take out corporate loans in the near future, percentage of responses percentage of responses 0 20 40 60 60 60 Raw material and supplies prices 45 45 Exchange rate Energy prices 30 30 Domestic competition 15 15 Wage costs Demand 0 0 Q2 19 Q3 19 Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Global prices Percentage of respondents who intend to take out loans Borrowing needs (balance of responses, right scale) Loan rates Q2 20 Q1 20 Tax burden Figure 9 Figure 10 Expectations of lending conditions for next 12 Assessment of factors that could deter months, balance of responses* companies from taking out loans, percentage of responses 0 0 20 40 60 80 High loan rates -10 Uncertainty about ability to meet debt obligations as they fall due -20 Collateral requirements -30 Other funding sources Q2 19 Q3 19 Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 *The dif f erence between the percentages of responses “tightened” and “eased” Q2 20 Exchange rate fluctuations Q1 20 Complicated paperwork 5 .
Recommended publications
  • Local and Regional Government in Ukraine and the Development of Cooperation Between Ukraine and the EU
    Local and regional government in Ukraine and the development of cooperation between Ukraine and the EU The report was written by the Aston Centre for Europe - Aston University. It does not represent the official views of the Committee of the Regions. More information on the European Union and the Committee of the Regions is available on the internet at http://www.europa.eu and http://www.cor.europa.eu respectively. Catalogue number: QG-31-12-226-EN-N ISBN: 978-92-895-0627-4 DOI: 10.2863/59575 © European Union, 2011 Partial reproduction is allowed, provided that the source is explicitly mentioned Table of Contents 1 PART ONE .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Overview of local and regional government in Ukraine ................................ 3 1.3 Ukraine’s constitutional/legal frameworks for local and regional government 7 1.4 Competences of local and regional authorities............................................... 9 1.5 Electoral democracy at the local and regional level .....................................11 1.6 The extent and nature of fiscal decentralisation in Ukraine .........................15 1.7 The extent and nature of territorial reform ...................................................19 1.8 The politics of Ukrainian administrative reform plans.................................21 1.8.1 Position of ruling government ..................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • UNHCR/GFK Desk Research of the Surveys of Idps
    DESK RESEARCH OF THE SURVEYS OF IDPs PREPARED FOR UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES (UNHCR) Prepared by: Inna Volosevych, Head of Department for Social and Political Research [email protected] Tetiana Kostiuchenko, Senior Researcher, Department for Social and Political Research [email protected] December, 2017 Table of contents: Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Glossary .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Key findings ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 Main gaps in IDP surveys ...................................................................................................................................... 9 1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................................ 11 1.1 Research objectives and design ...................................................................................................................... 11 1.2. Methodological problems which occur
    [Show full text]
  • CHANGES in RURAL AREAS of UKRAINE: PROBLEMS and OPPORTUNITIES Serhiy Moroz
    CHANGES IN RURAL AREAS OF UKRAINE: PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES Serhiy Moroz Assistant Professor, Department of Production Management and Entrepreneurship, Sumy National Agrarian University, 160, Kirov St., Sumy, 40021, Ukraine E-mail: [email protected] th Paper prepared for presentation at the 118 seminar of the EAAE (European Association of Agricultural Economists), ‘Rural development: governance, policy design and delivery’ Ljubljana, Slovenia, August 25-27, 2010 Copyright 2010 by [SERHIY MOROZ]. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. 631 Abstract The paper describes main changes in rural areas of Ukraine. It emphasizes that the key reason of existing socio-economic issues in rural regions is the absence of well-defined rural development policy. Thus, it is necessary for Ukraine to implement long-term rural policy, as it takes place in the EU countries. Rural policy should be aimed at overcoming of existing isolation between demographic, socio-economic, environmental, and production components concerning development of rural areas. The particular attention should be paid to the creation of local action groups. Also, special strategies should be developed to expand non-farm rural activities. Keywords: Rural development, rural policy, Ukraine. JEL: R11, R58 1. Introduction The revival of rural regions in Ukraine is directly connected with the solution of socio-economic issues. Under the former command economy, socio-economic development of rural areas was ensured at a quite high level due to centralized budget resources and financing from agricultural enterprises. The situation has changed completely since Ukraine became independent and began to introduce market reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Civil Society for Ukraine
    DEFINING CIVIL SOCIETY FOR UKRAINE SUMMARY OF THE RESEARCH REPORT A civil society is a domain/area of social/civil relations beyond the household/family, state and business, where people get together to satisfy and/or promote joint interests and to defend common values At the national level, it is suggested to use the legal denition of civil society organizations (hereafter – CSOs), i.e. all types of organization that qualies as a CSO by Ukrainian legislation including tax regulations). Major functions «INVISIBLE» «VISIBLE» of civil society or organizations ethical includes service includes protection of civic values and provision and social capital development (in particular, advocacy/public trust and mutual support) between monitoring and control members of the community/society In order to compare a CSO locally and relative to its counterpart in other countries, the experts agreed to apply the structural-operational denition of a CSO proposed by Salamon and Anheier (1992), such that an organization complying with the following criteria can serve as a basis for the denition of a CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION: AVAILABILITY OF AN INTERNAL STRUCTURE, OR BAN ON DISTRIBUTING PROFITS TO CERTAIN LEGALIZATION OF THE ORGANIZATION. MEMBERS AND PEOPLE IN CHARGE. NON-GOVERNMENTAL NATURE, IN PARTICULAR THE VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATION IS NOT PART OF PUBLIC AUTHORITIES. PARTICIPATION SELF-GOVERNANCE, IN PARTICULAR THE THE ORGANIZATION SERVES ITS ORGANIZATION CONDUCTS AND REGULATES ITS MEMBERS AND/OR PUBLIC ACTIVITIES ON ITS OWN. INTERESTS. Overview of the history of civil society in Ukraine allowed dening major stages in its development End of XVIX – Since 988 XV-XVIII c. beginning of XX с.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY REPORT for the Implementation of the PULSE Project
    QUARTERLY REPORT for the implementation of the PULSE Project APRIL – JUNE, 2020 (²I² QUARTER OF US FISCAL YEAR 2020) EIGHTEENTH QUARTER OF THE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION QUARTERLY REPORT for the implementation of the PULSE Project TABLE OF CONTENTS List of abbreviations 4 Resume 5 Chapter 1. KEY ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE REPORTING QUARTER 5 Chapter 2. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 7 Expected Result 1: Decentralisation enabling legislation reflects local government input 7 1.1. Local government officials participate in sectoral legislation drafting 8 grounded on the European sectoral legislative principles 1.1.1. Preparation and approval of strategies for sectoral reforms 8 1.1.2. Preparation of sectoral legislation 24 1.1.3. Legislation monitoring 33 1.1.4. Resolving local government problem issues and promotion of sectoral reforms 34 1.2. Local governments and all interested parties are actively engaged and use 40 participatory tool to work on legislation and advocating for its approval 1.2.1 Support for approval of drafted legislation in the parliament: 40 tools for interaction with the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine 1.2.2 Support to approval of resolutions and directives of the Cabinet of Ministers: 43 tools for interaction with the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine 1.3. Local governments improved their practice and quality of services 57 because of the sound decentralised legislative basis for local governments 1.3.1. Legal and technical assistance 57 1.3.2. Web-tools to increase the efficiency of local government activities 57 1.3.3. Feedback: receiving and disseminating 61 Expected Result 2: Resources under local self-governance authority increased 62 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Scenario 1) Background A. Donetsk and Luhansk Are Rebel
    Ukraine Scenario 1) Background a. Donetsk and Luhansk are rebel-held parts of Ukraine, and have been since 2014. The regions have ethnic Russian majorities and rebelled over attempts to ban Russian as an official language and curtail trade across the Russian border. Many of the rebels advocate secession. b. Ukraine’s state power company claimed the regions were some $431 million in debt over non- payment of bills. Russia says that they will be providing power through pre-existing lines effective immediately to avoid loss of electricity to some 3 million people in the effected areas. c. The decision by the Ukrainian government to cut power to the region appears to be an attempt to put pressure on the secessionist movement, though ironically by forcing them to turn to Russia for electricity, they may further enhance the region’s link to the Russian Federation. Source: “Russia to Supply Electricity to Eastern Ukraine After Kiev Cuts Power: Ukraine Says Regions Weren't Paying Their Bills,” Jason Ditz, Posted on April 25, Anti-War.com website: https://news.antiwar.com 2) Context a. Areas in Eastern Ukraine (Donbas Region) have had power cut by pro-Ukrainian (Kiev Government) groups that control the highest capacity power generation stations in the country. These are the 4 operational nuclear power stations in western Ukraine which includes the Zaporizhia Nuclear Power Station, the largest nuclear power plant in Europe generating 6,000 MW. This leaves the Russian controlled areas with a small number of lower capacity coal generation facilities to power the Donbas region with additional power provided by Russian power plants to support the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of Ukraine
    CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on June 28, 1996 Amended by the Laws of Ukraine № 2222-IV dated December 8, 2004, № 2952-VI dated February 1, 2011, № 586-VII dated September 19, 2013, № 742-VII dated February 21, 2014, № 1401-VIII dated June 2, 2016 № 2680-VIII dated February 7, 2019 The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, on behalf of the Ukrainian people - citizens of Ukraine of all nationalities, expressing the sovereign will of the people, based on the centuries-old history of Ukrainian state-building and on the right to self-determination realised by the Ukrainian nation, all the Ukrainian people, providing for the guarantee of human rights and freedoms and of the worthy conditions of human life, caring for the strengthening of civil harmony on Ukrainian soil, and confirming the European identity of the Ukrainian people and the irreversibility of the European and Euro-Atlantic course of Ukraine, striving to develop and strengthen a democratic, social, law-based state, aware of responsibility before God, our own conscience, past, present and future generations, guided by the Act of Declaration of the Independence of Ukraine of August 24, 1991, approved by the national vote on December 1, 1991, adopts this Constitution - the Fundamental Law of Ukraine. Chapter I General Principles Article 1 Ukraine is a sovereign and independent, democratic, social, law-based state. Article 2 The sovereignty of Ukraine extends throughout its entire territory. Ukraine is a unitary state. The territory of Ukraine within its present border is indivisible and inviolable. Article 3 The human being, his or her life and health, honour and dignity, inviolability and security are recognised in Ukraine as the highest social value.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentazione Di Powerpoint
    NATIONAL BANK OF UKRAINE Business Outlook Survey Q2 2016 The presented findings only reflect opinions of the respondents, heads/managers of Ukrainian enterprises, which were polled in Q2 2016, and shall not be considered as NBU forecasts or assessments Issue No.2 (42) Statistics and Reporting Department CONTENTS NATIONAL BANK OF UKRAINE Summary Passport of Sample Macroeconomic Expectations . Economic Situation in Ukraine . Inflationary and Exchange Rate Expectations Economic Activity of Enterprises . Situation as of the Time of the Survey . Business Outlook for the Next 12 months . Pricing Policy and Expenses of Enterprises . Financial Conditions Extra Materials - Consolidated Tables of Survey Findings 2 Business Outlook Survey Q2 2016 Summary NATIONAL BANK OF UKRAINE Respondents improved their expectations about the economic situation in Ukraine and prospects for the development of their enterprises over the next 12 months. Over the next 12 months, they expect: growth in the output of goods and services in Ukraine, with a balance of expectations of 2.1% (compare to (-18.5%) in Q1 2016); a significant slowdown of consumer prices growth rates, down to 18.9% (from 22.2% in Q1 2016); weakened depreciation developments, with an average of UAH/USD 28.66 (against UAH/USD 29.97 in Q1 2016). higher business activity: the business outlook index increased to 108.5% from 98.4% in Q1 2016. The increase was due to respondents’ improved assessments for all main types of business activities of enterprises of all types; higher borrowing needs. Enterprises plan to take loans primarily in hryvnias. The unstable political situation and excessive energy prices were mentioned as the main negative factors hampering enterprises' growth.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of UKRAINE and UKRAINIAN CULTURE Scientific and Methodical Complex for Foreign Students
    Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine Flight Academy of National Aviation University IRYNA ROMANKO HISTORY OF UKRAINE AND UKRAINIAN CULTURE Scientific and Methodical Complex for foreign students Part 3 GUIDELINES FOR SELF-STUDY Kropyvnytskyi 2019 ɍȾɄ 94(477):811.111 R e v i e w e r s: Chornyi Olexandr Vasylovych – the Head of the Department of History of Ukraine of Volodymyr Vynnychenko Central Ukrainian State Pedagogical University, Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate professor. Herasymenko Liudmyla Serhiivna – associate professor of the Department of Foreign Languages of Flight Academy of National Aviation University, Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate professor. ɇɚɜɱɚɥɶɧɨɦɟɬɨɞɢɱɧɢɣɤɨɦɩɥɟɤɫɩɿɞɝɨɬɨɜɥɟɧɨɡɝɿɞɧɨɪɨɛɨɱɨʀɩɪɨɝɪɚɦɢɧɚɜɱɚɥɶɧɨʀɞɢɫɰɢɩɥɿɧɢ "ȱɫɬɨɪɿɹ ɍɤɪɚʀɧɢ ɬɚ ɭɤɪɚʀɧɫɶɤɨʀ ɤɭɥɶɬɭɪɢ" ɞɥɹ ɿɧɨɡɟɦɧɢɯ ɫɬɭɞɟɧɬɿɜ, ɡɚɬɜɟɪɞɠɟɧɨʀ ɧɚ ɡɚɫɿɞɚɧɧɿ ɤɚɮɟɞɪɢ ɩɪɨɮɟɫɿɣɧɨʀ ɩɟɞɚɝɨɝɿɤɢɬɚɫɨɰɿɚɥɶɧɨɝɭɦɚɧɿɬɚɪɧɢɯɧɚɭɤ (ɩɪɨɬɨɤɨɥʋ1 ɜɿɞ 31 ɫɟɪɩɧɹ 2018 ɪɨɤɭ) ɬɚɫɯɜɚɥɟɧɨʀɆɟɬɨɞɢɱɧɢɦɢ ɪɚɞɚɦɢɮɚɤɭɥɶɬɟɬɿɜɦɟɧɟɞɠɦɟɧɬɭ, ɥɶɨɬɧɨʀɟɤɫɩɥɭɚɬɚɰɿʀɬɚɨɛɫɥɭɝɨɜɭɜɚɧɧɹɩɨɜɿɬɪɹɧɨɝɨɪɭɯɭ. ɇɚɜɱɚɥɶɧɢɣ ɩɨɫɿɛɧɢɤ ɡɧɚɣɨɦɢɬɶ ɿɧɨɡɟɦɧɢɯ ɫɬɭɞɟɧɬɿɜ ɡ ɿɫɬɨɪɿɽɸ ɍɤɪɚʀɧɢ, ʀʀ ɛɚɝɚɬɨɸ ɤɭɥɶɬɭɪɨɸ, ɨɯɨɩɥɸɽ ɧɚɣɜɚɠɥɢɜɿɲɿɚɫɩɟɤɬɢ ɭɤɪɚʀɧɫɶɤɨʀɞɟɪɠɚɜɧɨɫɬɿ. ɋɜɿɬɭɤɪɚʀɧɫɶɤɢɯɧɚɰɿɨɧɚɥɶɧɢɯɬɪɚɞɢɰɿɣ ɭɧɿɤɚɥɶɧɢɣ. ɋɬɨɥɿɬɬɹɦɢ ɪɨɡɜɢɜɚɥɚɫɹ ɫɢɫɬɟɦɚ ɪɢɬɭɚɥɿɜ ɿ ɜɿɪɭɜɚɧɶ, ɹɤɿ ɧɚ ɫɭɱɚɫɧɨɦɭ ɟɬɚɩɿ ɧɚɛɭɜɚɸɬɶ ɧɨɜɨʀ ɩɨɩɭɥɹɪɧɨɫɬɿ. Ʉɧɢɝɚ ɪɨɡɩɨɜɿɞɚɽ ɩɪɨ ɤɚɥɟɧɞɚɪɧɿ ɫɜɹɬɚ ɜ ɍɤɪɚʀɧɿ: ɞɟɪɠɚɜɧɿ, ɪɟɥɿɝɿɣɧɿ, ɩɪɨɮɟɫɿɣɧɿ, ɧɚɪɨɞɧɿ, ɚ ɬɚɤɨɠ ɪɿɡɧɿ ɩɚɦ ɹɬɧɿ ɞɚɬɢ. ɍ ɩɨɫɿɛɧɢɤɭ ɩɪɟɞɫɬɚɜɥɟɧɿ ɪɿɡɧɨɦɚɧɿɬɧɿ ɞɚɧɿ ɩɪɨ ɮɥɨɪɭ ɿ ɮɚɭɧɭ ɤɥɿɦɚɬɢɱɧɢɯ
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of the Forest Sector in Ukraine with the Focus on Wood Fuels
    Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 211 http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/2011/mwp211.htm ISBN 978-951-40-2327-9 (PDF) ISSN 1795-150X Atlas of the forest sector in Ukraine with the focus on wood fuels Eugene Lopatin, Juhani Marttila, Lauri Sikanen and Timo Eklund www.metla.fi Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 211 http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/2011/mwp211.htm Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute publishes preliminary research results and conference proceedings. The papers published in the series are not peer-reviewed. http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/ ISSN 1795-150X Office Post Box 18 FI-01301 Vantaa, Finland tel. +358 10 2111 fax +358 10 211 2101 e-mail [email protected] Publisher Finnish Forest Research Institute Post Box 18 FI-01301 Vantaa, Finland tel. +358 10 2111 fax +358 10 211 2101 e-mail [email protected] http://www.metla.fi/ 2 Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 211 http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/2011/mwp211.htm Authors Lopatin, Eugene, Marttila, Juhani, Sikanen, Lauri & Eklund, Timo Title Atlas of the forest sector in Ukraine with the focus on wood fuels Year Pages ISBN ISSN 2011 48 978-951-40-2327-9 (PDF) 1795-150X Unit / Research programme / Projects Joensuu Unit / 7395 Central and Eastern European Forest Information Service Accepted by Timo Karjalainen, Professor, 4 November 2011 Abstract This is a review of the current situation of the forest sector in Ukraine by considering a collection of maps. The cartographic information is grouped in the following way: forest resources, silviculture, wood harvesting, production and the most important producers of wood-based products, forest education and research and the potential of wood energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Flags of the Ukrainian Regions: Old Traditions and New Designs
    Contemporary flags of the Ukrainian regions: Old traditions and new designs Andriy Grechylo Abstract Ukraine consists of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and 24 oblasts (regions or provinces). The new law on local self-governments, adopted by the Verkhovna Rada (Parliament) of Ukraine in 1997, allowed local authorities to confirm the coats of arms, flags, and other symbols of oblasts, rayons (districts), cities, towns, and villages. Over the last six years, all oblasts have adopted their own symbols. Most of them have already adopted regional flags. Many of these flags have old historical signs and colours (Volyn, Ivano-Frankivsk, Lviv, etc.), but some oblasts have chosen new designs (Donetsk, Cherkasy, Kherson, and others). Ukraine is divided into 25 administrative territories — 24 oblasts (provinces or re- gions) and the Autonomous Republic of Crimea. Two cities, Kyiv and Sevastopol, have a special, national status. The oblast borders have remained unchanged since 1959, when Drohobych oblast was joined to the Lviv oblast (Fig. 1). After the disintegration of the Ruthenian Kingdom (Galician-Volynian State) in the middle of the 14th c., the Ukrainian lands were divided among various neighbour- ing countries. During this time the arms of separate administrative territories were used. When Ukraine was absorbed into the USSR, none of the oblasts possessed their own arms or flag. Only after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the declaration of Ukrainian independence did a process of the formation of symbols of administrative territories begin. The first regional coat of arms was ratified for the Transcarpathian (Zakarpattya) oblast in December 1990. In 1992 the symbols of Crimea, which received the status of an autonomous republic, were adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Transformation in Poland and Ukraine
    4 The demographic potential of Polish voivodeships and Ukrainian oblasts Nataliia Chugaievska, Oleksii Kelebaj and Tomasz Tokarski 4.1 Introduction The aim of this chapter is to characterize the absolute and relative demo- graphic potential of Polish and Ukrainian regions. In Poland, there are voivodeships (województwo), and in Ukraine oblasts (область). These anal- yses concern 2004–2017 (or 2004–2016) depending on the availability of statistics from the Central Statistical Data Bank (hereinafter BDL GUS, https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/) and the Ukrainian Statistical Office (Державна Cлужба Cтатистики України) (hereinafter ДCCУ, http:// www.ukrstat.gov.ua/http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/). This chapter analyzes the demographic potential of the population, pop- ulation density and the division of the population into urban and rural ar- eas. It also takes into consideration the spatial diversity and dynamics of both the population numbers and the urbanization rate. 4.2 Administrative divisions of Poland and Ukraine Since January 1, 1999, Poland has been divided into 16 voivodeships. For analytical purposes, these voivodeships are divided into four groups: • Mazowieckie, • five voivodeship in eastern Poland (Lubelskie, Podkarpackie, Podlaskie, Świętokrzyskie and Warmińsko-Mazurskie), • five in central Poland (Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Łódź, Małopolskie, Po- morskie and Śląskie), • five western Polish voivodeships (Dolnośląskie, Lubuskie, Opolskie, Wielkopolskie, and Zachodniopomorskie (Map 4.1). The Mazowieckie Voivodeship was treated as a separate entity, as it is atypi- cal as a voivodeship. This is because it contains the capital of Poland-Warsaw and the very economically vigorous city of Płock (mainly due to the largest Polish oil company “Orlen” being based there) and the fairly weak, economi- cally, agricultural environs surrounding Warsaw, Płock and Radom.
    [Show full text]