Results of surveysBusiness of Vinnitsa Outlook regionSurvey * enterprises manageof Kirovohradrs regarding Oblast their business expectations *

I квартал 2018Q року4 20 20

*Надані результати*This є survey відображенням only reflects лише the opinions думки респондентів of respondents – inкерівників Kirovohrad підприємств oblast (top managersВінницької of області в IІ кварталіcompanies) 2018 року who і wereне є прогнозамиpolled in Q4 та20 20оцінками, and does Національного not represent банку NBU forecastsУкраїни. or estimates

Business Outlook Survey of Kirovohrad Oblast Q4 2020

A survey of companies carried out in Kirovohrad oblast in Q4 2020 showed that respondents continued to expect a drop in the output of Ukrainian goods and services and weaker performance of their companies over the next 12 months on the back of a tighter quarantine. Respondents expected higher inflation and a more pronounced depreciation of the domestic currency. The top managers of companies said they expected that over the next 12 months:

. the output of Ukrainian goods and services would drop at a faster pace: the balance of expectations was (-23.1%) compared to (-8.3%) in Q3 2020 and (-24.4%) across (Figure 1)

. prices for consumer goods and services would rise at a faster pace: 53.8% of respondents expected the inflation rate to be lower than 7.5% (compared with 75.0% in the previous quarter and 49.2% across Ukraine). Respondents referred to production costs and the exchange rate as the main inflation drivers (Figure 2)

. the domestic currency would depreciate more noticeably: 84.6% of respondents (compared with 63.6% in the previous quarter) expected the hryvnia to weaken against the US dollar, with a figure of 87.1% across Ukraine

. the financial and economic standings of their companies would deteriorate (such expectations have been reported for five quarters running): the balance of expectations was (-8.3%) compared with (-25.0%) in the previous quarter. Companies across Ukraine expected their financial and economic standings to improve slightly (1.3%) (see Table)

. total sales would decrease: the balance of responses was (-7.7%) compared with (-18.2%) in the previous quarter (see Table). Respondents also expected a decrease in external sales (the balance of responses was (-25.0%) compared with (- 33.3%) in Q3 2020). Overall, companies across Ukraine expected sales to increase moderately, the balances of responses being 7.1% and 3.8% respectively

. investment both in construction and in machinery, equipment, and tools would decrease: the balances of responses were (-30.8%) and (-23.1%) respectively (compared to (-50.0%) and 0.0% respectively in Q3 2020). Across Ukraine, the balances of responses were (-4.5%) and 3.8% respectively

. staff numbers at their companies would drop at a fast pace: the balance of responses was (-30.8%) compared with (-33.3%) in Q3 2020 and (-9.9%) across Ukraine (Figure 4)

. purchase prices would rise at a faster pace (the balance of responses was 92.3%) than selling prices (the balance of responses was 30.8%) (compared with 83.3% and 33.3% respectively in the previous quarter) (Figure 6). Respondents cited the exchange rate as the main selling price driver. Respondents also referred to the impact of raw material and supplies prices, wage costs and demand as high (Figure 7)

. per-unit production costs and wage costs per staff member would increase at a slower pace: the balances of responses were 38.5% and 53.8% respectively (compared with 50.0% and 58.3% in Q3 2020) (Figures 6 and 4). Companies cited weak demand and the political situation as the main drags on their ability to boost production (Figure 5). Respondents lowered their expectations of an increase in their borrowing needs in the near future (Figure 8). The respondents who planned to take out corporate loans (38.5% of respondents) usually opted for domestic currency loans. Respondents said that lending standards had tightened (Figure 9). Respondents cited high loan rates and collateral requirements as the main factors that deterred them from taking out loans (Figure 10). All of the respondents said that they had encountered no difficulties in effecting transactions with funds deposited in bank accounts (96.9% across Ukraine).

Assessments of financial and economic standings as of the time of the survey (Figure 3)

. Companies assessed their current financial and economic standings as good: the balance of responses was 15.4% compared with 8.3% in Q3 2020. Across Ukraine, respondents assessed the current financial and economic standings of their companies as bad: the balance of responses was (-3.2%). . Finished goods stocks had increased and were assessed at a normal level: the balance of responses was 0.0% compared with (-12.5%) in Q3 2020.

. Unutilized production capacity had increased. Companies had a sufficient amount of unutilized production capacity to meet any unexpected rise in demand: the balance of responses was 7.7% (compared with 0.0% in Q3 2020).

2 Business Outlook Survey of Kirovohrad Oblast Q4 2020

Survey Details1,2

Respondents in terms of company size based on Respondents in terms of business Respondents in terms of main economic staff number, % activities,% activities, % Other Imports only 7.7 Small (up to 50 Agriculture Large (more 16.7 Transport and persons) Neither exporters 38.5 than 250 nor importers communications persons) 23.1 58.3 7.7 23.1 Wholesale and retail trade Both exporters 15.4 and importers 25.0

Mining Medium (from 51 and up Manufacturing 7.7 to 250 persons) 23.1 53.8 . Period: 6 November through 24 November 2020. . A total of 13 companies were polled. . A representative sample was generated on the basis of the agricultural sector.

Business outlook index for next 12 months in terms of regions,% Business Outlook Index for Next 12 Months in Terms of Regions3, %

Riv ne Oblast Voly n Oblast Oblast 106.9 103.7 Zhy tomyr 92.2 Oblast Oblast 98.8 106.2 Ky iv and Lv iv Oblast Ky iv Oblast 100.6 Poltav a Oblast Oblast Oblast 107.7 95.4 97.2 114.7 Khmelny tskyi Oblast Iv ano-Frankivsk Oblast Vinny tsia Oblast 89.2 Oblast 98.9 Oblast 105.3 no data 106.5 84 Cherniv tsi Oblast Kirov ohrad Oblast Dnipropetrov sk Oblast Oblast 94.5 79.9 92.5 no data Zaporizhia My kolaiv Oblast Odesa 87.3 Oblast Oblast 102.2 80.8 Oblast 104.7 minimum 79.9 1 quartile 92.3 1 quarter 2 quartile (median) 98.8 Crimea 2 quarter 3 quartile 105.2 no data 3 quarter maximum 114.7 4 quarter Ukraine 99.6

*a quartile is the v alue of the BOI where an ordered sample is div ided into f our equal-sized subgroups **a median is the v alue of the BOI in the middle of an ordered sampled where the sample is div ided into two equal-sized subgroups

Table. The Business Outlook Index of Companies in Kirovohrad Oblast and Its Components

Balances of responses, % Expectations over next 12 months for Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20

Financial and economic standings -7.1 -8.3 -15.4 -25.0 -8.3

Total sales -20.0 -16.7 -23.1 -18.2 -7.7

Investment in construction -28.6 -37.5 -38.5 -50.0 -30.8

Investment in machinery, equipment, and tools 7.1 -9.1 -30.8 0.0 -23.1

Staff numbers -33.3 -8.3 -41.7 -33.3 -30.8

1 This sample was generated in proportion to the contribution of each region and each economic activity to Ukraine’s gross value added. 2 Data for totals and components may be subject to rounding effects. 3 The business outlook index (BOI) is an aggregate indicator for expected business performance over the next 12 months. It is calculated using the balances of respondents' responses regarding changes in the financial and economic standings of their companies and future economic activity.

3 Business Outlook Survey of Kirovohrad Oblast Q4 2020

Figure 1 Figure 2

Output expectations for next 12 months, Assessment of consumer price drivers, percentage of responses percentage of responses

100 100 0 20 40 60 80

80 80 Exchange rate 60 60

40 40 Production costs 20 20

0 0 Household income

-20 -20 Global prices -40 -40

-60 -60 Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20 Tax changes Output will decrease Output will be unchanged Output will increase Budgetary social Balance of expectations (right-hand scale) spending Q4 20 Q3 20

Supply (availability) of money

Figure 3 Figure 4

Companies' economic activity as of the time of the Staff level and wage cost expectations for next 12 survey, balance of responses months, balance of responses 20 80

10 60

40 0 20 -10 0

-20 -20

-40 -30 Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20 -60 Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20 Financial and economic standings Staff level expectations Wage costs per staff member Finished goods stocks Unutilized production capacity Figure 5 Figure 6

Assessment of factors that impede output Expectations of producer prices for next 12 growth, percentage of responses months, balance of responses 0 20 40 60 100 Political situation

Weak demand 80 High raw material and supplies prices 60 High energy prices Insufficient production 40 capacity Exchange rate fluctuations 20 Tax burden 0 Lack of working assets Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20 Qualified staff shortages Purchase prices Selling prices Corruption Per-unit production costs

Regulatory burden Q4 20 Q3 20 Limited availability of loan

4 Business Outlook Survey of Kirovohrad Oblast Q4 2020

Figure 7 Figure 8

Expectations of borrowing needs and intentions to Assessment of selling price drivers, take out corporate loans in the near future, percentage of responses percentage of responses 0 20 40 60 80 45 45 Exchange rate

Raw material and supplies prices 30 30 Wage costs

Demand 15 15 Energy prices

Domestic competition 0 0 Global prices Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20 Percentage of respondents who intend to take out loans, % Tax burden Q4 20 Q3 20 Borrowing needs (balance of responses, right-hand scale) Loan rates

Figure 9 Figure 10

Expectations of lending conditions for next 12 Assessment of factors that could deter months, balance of responses* companies from taking out loans, percentage of responses 20 0 20 40 60 10 Collateral requirements 0

-10 High loan rates

-20 Other funding sources -30 Uncertainty about ability to -40 meet debt obligations as Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20 they fall due *The difference between the percentages of responses “tightened” and “eased” Q4 20 Complicated paperwork Q3 20

Exchange rate fluctuations

5