Multiple Amplexus in the Iberian Brown Frog Rana Iberica

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Multiple Amplexus in the Iberian Brown Frog Rana Iberica North-Western Journal of Zoology Vol. 4, No. 2, 2008, pp.327-330 [Online: Vol.4, 2008: 27] Multiple amplexus in the Iberian Brown Frog Rana iberica Cesar AYRES ROAGA-CINAM, Centro de Investigación e Información Ambiental – Lourizán, Estrada PO-546 Pontevedra-Marín, km. 4. Apdo. de Correos 127- C.P. 36080, Lourizán - Pontevedra- Spain, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. On February 29th 2008 I found a breeding aggregation of the Iberian Brown Frog in a small pond in Lourizan, Pontevedra, NW Spain. I observed at least five males trying to grasp one female. Multiple amplexus is not common in Rana iberica, and studies are needed to collect information about the extent of this behaviour. Key words: Rana iberica, multiple amplexus, NW Spain. Rana iberica is an endemic brown frog e Informacion Ambiental (CINAM) has from the Iberian Peninsula, occupying started. This forest is located near cold streams, ponds and mountain lakes Pontevedra, NW Spain, 57 m a.s.l., in the Northern and Western parts of 29TNG29. Reproduction of amphibians Spain and Portugal, with some isolated was detected in streams and also in some sites in the mountains of Sistema Central artificial ponds. Salamandra salamandra, from Central Spain (Salvador and Garcia- Lissotriton helveticus, Triturus marmoratus Paris, 2001). and Rana iberica were detected in high The breeding behaviour of this numbers; Lissotriton boscai and Rana perezi species is not well known. In NW Spain were scarcer. and Portugal the breeding season ranges On February 29th 2008 at 12:50 an from November to March in the unusual aggregation of R. iberica lowlands, and March-April in the individuals was detected in a small pond highlands (Crespo & Cei 1971, Galan after a cascade, no more than 10 cm deep, 1982), with a peak in March-April (Galan with refuges under stones, and high 1982). According to previous findings coverage of dead leaves. At least five (e.g. Galan 1982, Nöllert & Nöllert 1995) individuals were trying to clasp a big the amplexus occurs at night. However, it female (Fig. 1). Another male was resting seems possible that some breeding on the water surface close to the activity occurs also at daylight, as it is reproductive aggregation. Some of the described in this work. There is few data males hid away at the disturbance, but about reproductive aggregations (Nöllert two males remained in amplexus, the & Nöllert 1995) in R. iberica, but to our larger one in the usual axilar amplexus, knowledge no one reports multiple but the smaller one was clasping the amplexus in this species . female in inguinal amplexus (Fig. 2). This In 2008, herpetological monitoring of male tried to get into axilar amplexus the forest inside Centro de Investigacion going under the other male, both males North-West J Zool, 4, 2008 Oradea, Romania 328 Ayres, C. Figure 1. Several individual trying to clasp a big female. Figure 2. Two males in amplexus, one attached by inguinal amplexus, and the other by axilar amplexus. North-West J Zool, 4, 2008 Multiple amplexus in the Iberian Brown Frog Rana iberica 329 used hind legs to fight for the position. with low numbers of breeding indi- The female rested motionless at the viduals and should reduce the hetero- bottom of the pond, with its nose zygote deficit related to the breeding pointing to the surface, curving its body. pond fidelity usually exhibited by most At 14:30 the pond was surveyed again, anurans (Lodé & 2004, Lodé et al. 2005), and only the bigger male remained but other argue that costs of multiple attached to the female, both resting on amplexus, including risk of drowning, is the water surface and hiding under higher than possible advantages (Byrne stones at the disturbance. First ovated & Roberts 1999, 2000, Sztatecsny et al. females were found in mid-October 2007 2006, Lengagne et al. 2007). Nevertheless, in other streams of Galicia region, and no multiple mating could be advantageous more amplexus or egg-masses were for females by potentially increasing found after this episode in CINAM fertilisation, sperm quality or offspring stream. genetic diversity (Roberts et al. 1999). Multiple amplexus is especially Also it seems that multiple mating could common in explosive breeding amphi- be influenced by sex-biased predation bians where a large number of breeding that changes OSR (Lodé et al. 2004). adults can be present in the breeding site Because of their pond fidelity anurans for a short time period (days to weeks). are affected by heterozygote deficit In these species, females are important (Lesbarrères et al. 2003), and it may be resources for males because at least 2 suggested that polyandrous mating reasons: (i) the males are present in larger results in inbreeding avoidance. In a number than females even from the start species with high site fidelity and low of the breeding season and (ii) the males dispersal, as R. iberica (Rodríguez-Prieto breed with more females whereas the & Fernández-Juricic 2005), multiple females leave the pond in short time after mating could improve gene flow in small the eggs were laid (Hartel et al. 2007). populations. Further studies, including Thus the operational sex ratio (OSR) may molecular techniques, will be necessary be strongly male biased in these cases to assess if this hypothesis is true. resulting in an intense competition between males to obtain a mate. This competition may result in multiple amplexus, takeovers, and frequently, the References death of females, as it was observed for Ayres, C. (2008): Post-mortem amplexus in marauded example in B. bufo (Hartel et al. 2007, Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758). Podarcis 9 (In press). Ayres 2008). Byrne, P.G., Roberts, J.D. (2000): Does multiple paternity improve fitness in the frog Crinia georgiana? Multiple amplexus resulted in Evolution 54: 968-973. multiple paternity if fertilization occurs Byrne, P.G. and Roberts, J.D. (1999): Simultaneous in the red-eyed tree-frog, Agalychnys mating with multiple males reduces fertilisation success in the myobatrachid frog Crinia georgiana. callidryas, as revealed by DNA finger- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 264: printing (D’Orgeix & Turner 1995). Some 95-98. Crespo, E.G., Cei. J.M. (1971): L'activité spermato- authors argue that multiple mating génetique saisonniere de Rana iberica Boul. du nord system could be advantageous for species de Portugal. Arquivos do Museo Bocage (2ª Serie) 3: 37-50. North-West J Zool, 4, 2008 330 Ayres, C. D’Orgeix, C. A., Turner B. J. (1995): Multiple-paternity in Lodé T., Holveck M-J., Lesbarrères D. (2005): the red-eyed tree frog, Agalychnis callidryas (Cope). Asynchronous arrival pattern, operational sex ratio Molecular Ecology 5: 505-508. and occurrence of multiple paternities in a Galán Rega lado, P. (1982): Biología de la reproducción territorial breeding anuran, Rana dalmatina. de Rana iberica Boulenger, 1879 en zonas Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 86: 191- simpátridas con Rana temporaria Linneo, 1758. 200. Doñana, Acta Vertebrata 9: 85-98. Nöllert, A, Nöllert, C. (1995): Anfibios de Europa. Halliday TR, Tejedo M (1995): Intrasexual selection and Identificación, amenazas, protección. Ed. Omega, alternative mating behaviour. In: Heatwole H, Barcelona. Sullivan BK (eds) Amphibian biology: vol 2, social Rodríguez-Prieto, I., Fernández-Juricic, E. (2005): Effects behaviour. Surrey Beatty, Sydney, pp 419–468. of direct human disturbance on the endemic Iberian Hartel, T., Sas, I., Pernetta, A.P., Geltsch, I.C. (2007): The frog Rana iberica at individual and population reproductive dynamics of temperate amphibians: A levels. Biological Conservation 123: 1-9. review. North-Western Journal of Zoology 3: 127- Roberts, J.D., Standish, R.J., Byrne, P.G. and Doughty, P. 145. (1999): Synchronous polyandry and multiple Lengagne, T., Arthaud, F. Cormier, M., Joly, P. (2007): paternity in the frog Crinia georgiana (Anura: Cost of sexually embracing a large female offset by Myobatrachidae). Animal Behaviour 57: 721-726. the number of eggs fertilized for small male Bufo Salvador, A., García-París, M. (2001): Anfibios bufo L. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 92: Españoles. Identificación, historia natural y 755-762. distribución. Canseco Editores, Talavera de la Lesbarrères, D.,Pagano, A., Lodé, T. (2003): Inbreeding Reina. and road effect zone in a Ranidae: the case of agile Sztatecsny M., Jehle R., Burke T., Hödl W. (2006): Female frog (Rana dalmatina Bonaparte, 1840). Comptes polyandry under male harassment: the case of the rendus biologies 326: S68–S72. common toad (Bufo bufo). Journal of Zoology 270: Lodé T., Lesbarrères D. (2004): Multiple paternity in 517–522. Rana dalmatina, a monogamous territorial breeding Anuran. Naturwissenschaften 91: 44-47. Lodé T., Holveck M-J., Lesbarrères D., Pagano A. (2004): Sex-biased predation by polecat influences frog polyandrous mating. Proceedings of the Royal Submitted: 21 March 2008 Society of London B (Suppl.). Biology Letters 271 / Accepted: 24 July 2008 (S6): 399-401. North-West J Zool, 4, 2008 .
Recommended publications
  • A New Species of the Genus Nasikabatrachus (Anura, Nasikabatrachidae) from the Eastern Slopes of the Western Ghats, India
    Alytes, 2017, 34 (1¢4): 1¢19. A new species of the genus Nasikabatrachus (Anura, Nasikabatrachidae) from the eastern slopes of the Western Ghats, India S. Jegath Janani1,2, Karthikeyan Vasudevan1, Elizabeth Prendini3, Sushil Kumar Dutta4, Ramesh K. Aggarwal1* 1Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CSIR-CCMB), Uppal Road, Tarnaka, Hyderabad, 500007, India. <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>. 2Current Address: 222A, 5th street, Annamalayar Colony, Sivakasi, 626123, India.<[email protected]>. 3Division of Vertebrate Zoology, Department of Herpetology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York NY 10024-5192, USA. <[email protected]>. 4Nature Environment and Wildlife Society (NEWS), Nature House, Gaudasahi, Angul, Odisha. <[email protected]>. * Corresponding Author. We describe a new species of the endemic frog genus Nasikabatrachus,from the eastern slopes of the Western Ghats, in India. The new species is morphologically, acoustically and genetically distinct from N. sahyadrensis. Computed tomography scans of both species revealed diagnostic osteological differences, particularly in the vertebral column. Male advertisement call analysis also showed the two species to be distinct. A phenological difference in breeding season exists between the new species (which breeds during the northeast monsoon season; October to December), and its sister species (which breeds during the southwest monsoon; May to August). The new species shows 6 % genetic divergence (K2P) at mitochondrial 16S rRNA (1330 bp) partial gene from its congener, indicating clear differentiation within Nasikabatra- chus. Speciation within this fossorial lineage is hypothesized to have been caused by phenological shift in breeding during different monsoon seasons—the northeast monsoon in the new species versus southwest monsoon in N.
    [Show full text]
  • Male Bufo Bufo (Anura: Bufonidae) Passionately Embracing a Bulge of Mud
    Correspondence ISSN 2336-9744 The journal is available on line at www.ecol-mne.com Strange affection: male Bufo bufo (Anura: Bufonidae) passionately embracing a bulge of mud SONJA ĐOR ĐEVI Ć1,2,* and ALEKSANDAR SIMOVI Ć2 1University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Zoology. Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2Serbian Herpetological Society “Milutin Radovanovi ć”. Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia. E- mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Received 13 March 2014 │ Accepted 20 March 2014 │ Published online 21 March 2014. On March 11 th 2014, app. between 10 AM and noon, we visited a pond on the Avala Mt. (44°40.879 ′ N, 20°33.098 ′ E, 230 m a.s.l.). Its north–northeastern portion, overgrown with reeds, was crowded with common toads, Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758). Males were vocalizing, chasing females (and males), struggling to clasp them in firm grip; we observed several “mating balls” – three to ten males were vigorously fighting over a single female. On the margin of that mating frenzy, at the edge of the pond, we observed a silent, lonely male holding on to a bulge of mud (Fig. 1). He was literally motionless in that position for at least half an hour (recorded time). Figure 1. Male common toad firmly grasping a muddy protuberance (Photo: S. Đor đevi ć) Anurans are notorious for making mistakes during mating. Their erroneous amplexuses include conspecific males, dead conspecifics of both sexes, other anuran species, caudates, fish, small tortoises, etc., and even inanimate floating objects (Banta, 1914; Davies & Halliday, 1979; Pearl et al., 2005; Simovi ć et al., 2014; Storm, 1952).
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite Toad Conservation Assessment
    United States Department of Agriculture YOSEMITE TOAD CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT A Collaborative Inter-Agency Project Forest Pacific Southwest R5-TP-040 January Service Region 2015 YOSEMITE TOAD CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT A Collaborative Inter-Agency Project by: USDA Forest Service California Department of Fish and Wildlife National Park Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Technical Coordinators: Cathy Brown USDA Forest Service Amphibian Monitoring Team Leader Stanislaus National Forest Sonora, CA [email protected] Marc P. Hayes Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Research Scientist Science Division, Habitat Program Olympia, WA Gregory A. Green Principal Ecologist Owl Ridge National Resource Consultants, Inc. Bothel, WA Diane C. Macfarlane USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Threatened Endangered and Sensitive Species Program Leader Vallejo, CA Amy J. Lind USDA Forest Service Tahoe and Plumas National Forests Hydroelectric Coordinator Nevada City, CA Yosemite Toad Conservation Assessment Brown et al. R5-TP-040 January 2015 YOSEMITE TOAD WORKING GROUP MEMBERS The following may be the contact information at the time of team member involvement in the assessment. Becker, Dawne Davidson, Carlos Harvey, Jim Associate Biologist Director, Associate Professor Forest Fisheries Biologist California Department of Fish and Wildlife Environmental Studies Program Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest 407 West Line St., Room 8 College of Behavioral and Social Sciences USDA Forest Service Bishop, CA 93514 San Francisco State University 1200 Franklin Way (760) 872-1110 1600 Holloway Avenue Sparks, NV 89431 [email protected] San Francisco, CA 94132 (775) 355-5343 (415) 405-2127 [email protected] Boiano, Daniel [email protected] Aquatic Ecologist Holdeman, Steven J. Sequoia/Kings Canyon National Parks Easton, Maureen A.
    [Show full text]
  • How Ecology and Evolution Shape Species Distributions and Ecological Interactions Across Time and Space
    HOW ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION SHAPE SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS AND ECOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS ACROSS TIME AND SPACE by IULIAN GHERGHEL Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Advisor: Ryan A. Martin Department of Biology CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY January, 2021 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the dissertation of Iulian Gherghel Candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy* Committee Chair Dr. Ryan A. Martin Committee Member Dr. Sarah E. Diamond Committee Member Dr. Jean H. Burns Committee Member Dr. Darin A. Croft Committee Member Dr. Viorel D. Popescu Date of Defense November 17, 2020 * We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein TABLE OF CONTENTS List of tables ........................................................................................................................ v List of figures ..................................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... viii Abstract ............................................................................................................................. iix INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1. POSTGLACIAL RECOLONIZATION OF NORTH AMERICA BY SPADEFOOT TOADS: INTEGRATING
    [Show full text]
  • July to December 2019 (Pdf)
    2019 Journal Publications July Adelizzi, R. Portmann, J. van Meter, R. (2019). Effect of Individual and Combined Treatments of Pesticide, Fertilizer, and Salt on Growth and Corticosterone Levels of Larval Southern Leopard Frogs (Lithobates sphenocephala). Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 77(1), pp.29-39. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31020372 Albecker, M. A. McCoy, M. W. (2019). Local adaptation for enhanced salt tolerance reduces non‐ adaptive plasticity caused by osmotic stress. Evolution, Early View. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/evo.13798 Alvarez, M. D. V. Fernandez, C. Cove, M. V. (2019). Assessing the role of habitat and species interactions in the population decline and detection bias of Neotropical leaf litter frogs in and around La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. Neotropical Biology and Conservation 14(2), pp.143– 156, e37526. https://neotropical.pensoft.net/article/37526/list/11/ Amat, F. Rivera, X. Romano, A. Sotgiu, G. (2019). Sexual dimorphism in the endemic Sardinian cave salamander (Atylodes genei). Folia Zoologica, 68(2), p.61-65. https://bioone.org/journals/Folia-Zoologica/volume-68/issue-2/fozo.047.2019/Sexual-dimorphism- in-the-endemic-Sardinian-cave-salamander-Atylodes-genei/10.25225/fozo.047.2019.short Amézquita, A, Suárez, G. Palacios-Rodríguez, P. Beltrán, I. Rodríguez, C. Barrientos, L. S. Daza, J. M. Mazariegos, L. (2019). A new species of Pristimantis (Anura: Craugastoridae) from the cloud forests of Colombian western Andes. Zootaxa, 4648(3). https://www.biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.4648.3.8 Arrivillaga, C. Oakley, J. Ebiner, S. (2019). Predation of Scinax ruber (Anura: Hylidae) tadpoles by a fishing spider of the genus Thaumisia (Araneae: Pisauridae) in south-east Peru.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Diversity of Anura
    Diversity of Anura WFS 433/533 1/24/2013 Lecture goal To familiarize students with the different families of the order anura. To familiarize students with aspects of natural history and world distribution of anurans Required readings: Wells: pp. 15-41 http://amphibiaweb.org/aw/index.html Lecture roadmap Characteristics of Anurans Anuran Diversity Anuran families, natural history and world distribution 1 What are amphibians? These foul and loathsome animals are abhorrent because of their cold body, pale color, cartilaginous skeleton, filthy skin, fierce aspect, calculating eye, offensive smell, harsh voice, squalid habitation, and terrible venom; and so their Creator has not exerted his powers to make many of them. Carl von Linne (Linnaeus) Systema Naturae (1758) What are frogs? A thousand splendid suns, a million moons, a billion twinkle stars are nothing compared to the eyes of a frog in the swamp —Miss Piggy about Kermit, in Larry king live, 1993 Diversity of anurans Global Distribution 30 Families 4963 spec ies Groups: •Archaeobatrachia (4 families) •Mesobatrachia (5 families) 30 Families •Neobatrachia (all other families) 2 No. of Known Species in Number of Species Number of Species in Family World in the United States? Tennessee? Allophrynidae 10 0 Arthroleptidae 78 0 0 Ascaphidae 22 0 Bombinatoridae 11 0 0 Brachycephalidae 60 0 Bufonidae 457 23 2 Centrolenidae 139 0 0 Dendrobatidae 219 1* 0 Discoglossidae 11 0 0 Heleophrynidae 60 0 Hemisotidae 90 0 Hylidae 851 29* 10 Hyperoliidae 253 0 0 Leiopelmatidae 40 0 30 families Leptodactylidae
    [Show full text]
  • PANAMANIAN GOLDEN FROG Anura Family: Bufonidae Genus: Atelopus Species: Zeteki
    PANAMANIAN GOLDEN FROG Anura Family: Bufonidae Genus: Atelopus Species: zeteki Range: Endemic to Panama in Central America Habitat: rain forests and cloud forest streams Niche: insectivorous, diurnal, semi-aquatic Wild diet: invertebrates such as beetles, flies, ants, springtails, caterpillars, wasps and spiders Zoo diet: Life Span: 12 years Sexual dimorphism: females are 25% longer and heavier than males Location in SF Zoo: South American Tropical Rainforest and Aviary APPEARANCE & PHYSICAL ADAPTATIONS: Panamanian Golden Frogs are a light yellowish green to bright gold with some individuals exhibiting black splotches on their back and legs. Panamanian golden frog is brightly colored to warn potential predators that it is very toxic (aposematic). Like other frogs and toads, the golden frog is capable of secreting a poison to help protect themselves from predators and they are toxic to the touch. The Panamanian golden frog has a variety of toxins, including the nerve toxin “zetekitoxin” after their scientific name. The toxins are acquired through the different is kinds of invertebrates and insects that it eats. All animals in the Bufonidae Family have toxic skin secretions for protection, but the Panamanian golden frog's Weight: M 0.1 to 0.4 oz secretions are the most toxic of this group. F 0.14 to 0.5 oz Length: M 1.4 to 1.9 in Males have nuptial pads, a secondary sex characteristic, a F 1.7 to 2.5 in swelling on the forearm and hand that aids with grip. These pads are used primarily in clasping females during amplexus. STATUS & CONSERVATION The Panamanian golden is a rare species of toad to Panama.
    [Show full text]
  • Atelopus-Varius-Zeteki-Husbandry-Manual.Pdf
    Husbandry Manual Panamanian Golden Frog Atelopus zeteki Second Edition by Vicky Poole, National Aquarium in Baltimore BACKGROUND HISTORY A pathogenic fungus capable of causing sporadic deaths in some amphibian populations and 100% mortality in others, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, has been isolated from the skin of dead and dying amphibians on every amphibian-inhabited continent. Chytrid fungi typically live in water or soil, although some are parasites of plants and insects. They reproduce asexually and have spores that 'swim' through the water. Only the amphibian chytrid fungus is known to infect vertebrate species. Individual frogs are thought to contract the disease when their skin comes into contact with water that contains spores from infected animals. Chytrid causes death in post-metamorphic frogs by causing focal hyperkeratosis (thickening) and erosion of epidermis in frogs (excessive skin shedding and/or red areas, generally the first clinical sign) and infects the keratinized mouthparts of tadpoles causing erosion (potential starvation). Some amphibians, including two commercially important and widely traded species, American bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) and African clawed frogs (Xenopus leavis), have proven to be carriers of the B. dendrobatidis without becoming susceptable to the disease chytridiomycosis. In Central America, chytridiomycosis (or “chytrid”) was first observed in montane central Costa Rica, where it may have been the cause for extinction of the golden toad, Bufo periglenes. It has since become evident that this epizootic is advancing southeast through the mid- to high-elevation mountain forests of Central America, decimating entire populations of amphibians, including Atelopus senex, and A. chiriquensis. As of 2005, the disease front is documented as far east as eastern El Cope (K.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Patterns of Amplexus Diversity in Anurans
    applyparastyle “fig//caption/p[1]” parastyle “FigCapt” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2020, 129, 652–663. With 4 figures. Much more than a clasp: evolutionary patterns of amplexus diversity in anurans JUAN D. CARVAJAL-CASTRO1,2,*, YELENNY LÓPEZ-AGUIRRE2, Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article/129/3/652/5753927 by William & Mary user on 30 October 2020 ANA MARÍA OSPINA-L1,2, JUAN C. SANTOS3, BIBIANA ROJAS4 and FERNANDO VARGAS-SALINAS2 1Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Villa de Leyva and Bogotá DC, Colombia 2Grupo de Investigación en Evolución, Ecología y Conservación (EECO), Universidad del Quindío, Armenia, Colombia 3Department of Biological Sciences, St. John’s University, Queens, NY, USA 4Department of Biology and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland Received 26 November 2019; revised 14 January 2020; accepted for publication 15 January 2020 The evolution and diversification of animal reproductive modes have been pivotal questions in behavioural ecology. Amphibians present the highest diversity of reproductive modes among vertebrates, involving various behavioural, physiological and morphological traits. One such feature is the amplexus, which is the clasp or embrace of males on females during reproduction and is found almost universally in anurans. Hypotheses about the origin of amplexus are limited and have not been tested thoroughly, nor have they taken into account evolutionary relationships in most comparative studies. However, these considerations are crucial to an understanding of the evolution of reproductive modes. Here, using an evolutionary framework, we reconstruct the ancestral state of amplexus in 685 anuran species. We investigate whether the type of amplexus has a strong phylogenetic signal and test whether sexual size dimorphism could have influenced amplexus type or male performance while clasping females.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species Bulletin, Spring 2008, "Year of the Frog"
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Spring 2008 Volume 33, No. 1 The Year of the Frog The Association of Zoos & Aquariums in North America, the world’s other professional zoo and aquar- ium associations, other conservation organizations, and government agencies have joined in a global effort to save imperiled amphibians. To raise global awareness of the plight of frogs, other amphibians, and activities to conserve vulnerable species, these partners have named 2008 as “The Year of the Frog.” The Year of the Frog Endangered Species Bulletin Spring 2008 Spring 2008 Endangered Species Bulletin IN THIS ISSUE 4 The Global Amphibian Crisis 7 Project Golden Frog 11 Chiricahua Leopard Frog Inches Towards Recovery Telephone: 703-358-2390 Contributors 15 Giving Leopard Frogs a Head Start Fax: 703-358-1735 Paul Boyle Jeff Ettling E-mail: [email protected] Shelly Grow Jill Utrup Vicky Poole Kim Mitchell Web site: Jim Rorabaugh Chad Mellison 18 Building Conservation Partnerships www.fws.gov/endangered/bulletin.html Melissa Kreutzian Ashley Bradley with Zoos Editor Mike Sredl Kate Symonds Michael Bender Charlie Painter Della K. Snyder-Velto Roberto Aguilar Christina Lydick Art Director Juan Carlos Bravo Joe Milmoe 20 Conserving Missouri’s Hellbenders Jennifer Hennessey Carter Kruse Lianne Ball Tara Sprankle Jim Knox Diane Barber Jeff Servoss The Ozark Hellbender: Out from 22 Under a Rock 25 Conserving Columbian Spotted Frogs in Nevada The Panamanian golden frog (cover) and the Mississippi dusky gopher frog (opposite page), both of which are imperiled with extinction, illustrate the dangers facing many of the world’s amphibian species. 28 A Leap Forward for the Mountain photos © Michael Redmer Yellow-legged Frog 30 Ranchers Restore Amphibian- friendly Ponds 32 Moving Quickly Saves a Breeding Season 34 Evaluating Amphibian Abnormalities on Wildlife Refuges The Endangered Species Bulletin is now an on-line publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Assessments and Phylogenetic Relationships of the Seychellean Frogs of the Family Sooglossidae (Amphibia: Anura) Ronald A
    Zoological Studies 46(3): 322-335 (2007) Morphological Assessments and Phylogenetic Relationships of the Seychellean Frogs of the Family Sooglossidae (Amphibia: Anura) Ronald A. Nussbaum1 and Sheng-Hai Wu2,* 1Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, USA 2Department of Life Sciences, National Chung-Hsing University, 250 Kuo-Kwang Road, Taichung 402, Taiwan (Accepted December 21, 2006) Ronald A. Nussbaum and Sheng-Hai Wu (2007) Morphological assessments and phylogenetic relationships of the Seychellean frogs of the family Sooglossidae (Amphibia: Anura). Zoological Studies 46(3): 322-335. The frog family Sooglossidae is endemic to the Seychelles Is. in the Indian Ocean, and consists of 2 genera and 4 species, the monotypic Nesomantis and Sooglossus (3 species). Many previous studies have suggested that Sooglossus sechellensis is more similar to Nesomantis thomasseti than to its congener, S. gardineri. Based on an extensive dataset of 188 morphological characters, we concluded that Nesomantis and S. sechel- lensis form a monophyletic group with the exclusion of S. gardineri (and S. pipilodryas). We therefore have established a new genus, Sechellophryne, to accommodate the latter 2 species. http://zoolstud.sinica.edu.tw/Journals/46.3/322.pdf Key words: Nesomantis thomasseti, Sooglossus gardineri, Sooglossus pipilodryas, Sooglossus sechellensis, Sechellophyrne gen. nov. The granitic Seychelles Is. lie in the western rious until the late 20th century when continental Indian Ocean between 4 and 5 S latitude and drift gained respectability, and the formation of the 55 and 56 E longitude, °about 1600° km east of western Indian Ocean through the breakup of Africa° (Mombasa),° 926 km northeast of Gondwanaland began to be understood.
    [Show full text]
  • Foothill Yellow-Legged Frog Conservation Assessment in California
    United States Department of Agriculture Foothill Yellow-Legged Frog Conservation Assessment in California Forest Pacific Southwest General Technical Report August Service Research Station PSW-GTR-248 2016 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institu- tions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expres- sion), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program infor- mation (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program informa- tion may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust. html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]