SELECTED HYDROLOGIC DATA FOR THE MESILLA GROUND-WATER BASIN, 1987 THROUGH 1992 WATER YEARS, DONA ANA COUNTY, , AND EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS By Edward L. Nickerson

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 95-111

Prepared in cooperation with the

NEW MEXICO STATE ENGINEER OFFICE, ELEPHANT BUTTE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, CITY OF LAS CRUCES, NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY, EL PASO WATER UTILITIES, JORNADA RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT, and INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION-U.S. SECTION

Albuquerque, New Mexico 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director

For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from:

U.S. Geological Survey District Chief Earth Science Information Center U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports Section Water Resources Division Box 25286, MS 517 4501 Indian School Rd. NE, Suite 200 Denver Federal Center Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract...... 1 Introduction...... 1 Purpose and scope...... 2 Description of the study area...... 2 Acknowledgments...... 2 Well-numbering systems...... 2 New Mexico system...... 4 Texas system...... 4 Geohydrologic setting...... 6 Mesilla ground-water basin monitoring program...... 6 Mesilla ground-water basin observation-well network...... 7 Mesilla Valley hydrologic sections...... 7 Las Cruces hydrologic section...... 7 River-stage station...... 7 Well group LC-1...... 12 Well group LC-2...... 12 Well group LC-3...... 12 low-flow station...... 12 Mesquite hydrologic section...... 13 River-stage station ...... 13 Well group M-l...... 13 Well group M-2...... 13 Well group M-3...... 13 Well group M-4...... 14 Canutillo well-field hydrologic section...... 14 River-stage station...... 14 Well group CWF-1...... 14 Well group CWF-2...... 14 Well group CWF-3...... 15 Well group CWF-4...... 15 Rio Grande seepage investigations...... 15 1987 water year...... 18 1988 water year...... 26 1989 water year...... 34 1990 water year...... 42 1991 water year...... 50 1992 water year...... 58 Selected references ...... 66

iii FIGURES Page 1. Map showing location of the study area...... 3 2. Diagram showing system of numbering wells in New Mexico...... 5 3. Diagram showing system of numbering wells in Texas...... 5 4. Map showing location of observation wells and hydrologic sections in the Mesilla ground-water basin, New Mexico and Texas...... 8 5. Diagram showing Las Cruces hydrologic section...... 9 6. Diagram showing Mesquite hydrologic section...... 10 7. Diagram showing Caftutillo well-field hydrologic section...... 11 8. Map showing location of discharge measurement sites, water-quality sites, and selected observation wells during seepage investigations of the Rio Grande from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, 1988 through 1992 water years... 16 9-21. Hydrographs showing: 9. Indicated gain or loss of streamflow during seepage investigations of the Rio Grande from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, 1988 through 1992 water years...... 17 10. Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Picacho Bridge, 1987 water year...... 19 11. Mean daily water levels in well group LC-1,1987 water year...... 19 12. Mean daily water levels in well group LC-2,1987 water year...... 20 13. Mean daily water levels in well group LC-3,1987 water year...... 20 14. Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Mesilla Dam, 1987 water year...... 21 15. Mean daily water levels in well group M-l, 1987 water year...... 21 16. Mean daily water levels in well group M-2,1987 water year...... 22 17. Mean daily water levels in well group M-4,1987 water year...... 22 18. Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Vinton Bridge, 1987 water year...... 23 19. Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-1,1987 water year...... 23 20. Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-2,1987 water year...... 24 21. Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-3,1987 water year...... 24

IV FIGURES-Continued Page 22-43. Hydrographs showing: 22. Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-4,1987 water year...... 25 23. Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Picacho Bridge, 1988 water year...... 27 24. Mean daily water levels in well group LC-1,1988 water year...... 27 25. Mean daily water levels in well group LC-2,1988 water year...... 28 26. Mean daily water levels in well group LC-3,1988 water year...... 28 27. Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Mesilla Dam, 1988 water year...... 29 28. Mean daily water levels in well group M-l, 1988 water year...... 29 29. Mean daily water levels in well group M-2,1988 water year...... 30 30. Mean daily water levels in well group M-4,1988 water year...... 30 31. Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Vinton Bridge, 1988 water year...... 31 32. Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-1,1988 water year...... 31 33. Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-2,1988 water year...... 32 34. Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-3,1988 water year...... 32 35. Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-4,1988 water year...... 33 36. Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Picacho Bridge, 1989 water year...... 35 37. Mean daily water levels in well group LC-1,1989 water year...... 35 38. Mean daily water levels in well group LC-2,1989 water year...... 36 39. Mean daily water levels in well group LC-3,1989 water year...... 36 40. Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Mesilla Dam, 1989 water year...... 37 41. Mean daily water levels in well group M-l, 1989 water year...... 37 42. Mean daily water levels in well group M-2,1989 water year...... 38 43. Mean daily water levels in well group M-4,1989 water year...... 38 FIGURES-Continued Page 44-61. Hydrographs showing: 44. Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Vinton Bridge/ 1989 water year...... 39 45. Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-1,1989 water year...... 39 46. Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-2,1989 water year...... 40 47. Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-3,1989 water year...... 40 48. Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-4,1989 water year...... 41 49. Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Picacho Bridge, 1990 water year...... 43 50. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group LC-1,1990 water year...... 43 51. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group LC-2,1990 water year...... 44 52. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group LC-3,1990 water year...... 44 53. Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Mesilla Dam, 1990 water year...... 45 54. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group M-l, 1990 water year...... 45 55. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group M-2,1990 water year...... 46 56. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group M-4,1990 water year...... 46 57. Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Vinton Bridge, 1990 water year...... 47 58. Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-1,1990 water year...... 47 59. Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-2,1990 water year...... 48 60. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group CWF-3,1990 water year...... 48 61. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group CWF-4,1990 water year...... 49

VI FIGURES-Continued Page 62-79. Hydrographs showing: 62. Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Picacho Bridge/ 1991 water year...... 51 63. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group LC-1,1991 water year...... 51 64. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group LC-2,1991 water year...... 52 65. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group LC-3,1991 water year...... 52 66. Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Mesilla Dam, 1991 water year...... 53 67. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group M-l, 1991 water year...... 53 68. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group M-2,1991 water year...... 54 69. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group M-4,1991 water year...... 54 70. Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Vinton Bridge, 1991 water year...... 55 71. Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-1,1991 water year...... 55 72. Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-2,1991 water year...... 56 73. Miscellaneous water levels in well group CWF-3,1991 water year...... 56 74. Miscellaneous water levels in well group CWF-4,1991 water year...... 57 75. Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Picacho Bridge, 1992 water year...... 59 76. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group LC-1,1992 water year...... 59 77. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group LC-2,1992 water year...... 60 78. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group LC-3,1992 water year...... 60 79. Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Mesilla Dam, 1992 water year...... 61

Vll FIGURES-Concluded Page 80-87. Hydrographs showing: 80. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group M-l, 1992 water year...... 61 81. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group M-2,1992 water year...... 62 82. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group M-4,1992 water year...... 62 83. Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Vinton Bridge, 1992 water year...... 63 84. Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-1,1992 water year...... 63 85. Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-2,1992 water year...... 64 86. Miscellaneous water levels in well group CWF-3,1992 water year...... 64 87. Miscellaneous water levels in well group CWF-4,1992 water year...... 65

vin TABLES Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin...... 67 2. Low-flow discharge record for the Rio Grande below Picacho Bridge near Las Cruces, New Mexico/1991 water year...... 91 3. Low-flow discharge record for the Rio Grande below Picacho Bridge near Las Cruces, New Mexico, 1992 water year...... 92 4. Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 5-6,1988...... 93 5. Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 10-11,1989...... 97 6. Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 9-10,1990...... 101 7. Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 8-9,1991...... 105 8. Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs to Vado, New Mexico, December 17,1991...... 109 9. Chemical analyses of water samples collected from the Rio Grande during seepage investigations, 1988 through 1992 water years...... Ill 10. Water levels in selected observation wells completed in the shallow flood-plain alluvium during Rio Grande seepage investigations, 1988 through 1992 water years...... 117

IX CONVERSION FACTORS AND VERTICAL DATUM

Multiply By To obtain

inch 25.4 millimeter foot 0.3048 meter mile 1.609 kilometer acre 4,047 square meter square mile 2.590 square kilometer acre-foot 1,233 cubic meter cubic foot per second 0.02832 cubic meter per second

Temperature in degrees Celsius (°C) can be converted to degrees Fahrenheit (°F) by the equation:

°F=9/5 (°C) + 32

Sea level: In this report, "sea level" refers to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 a geodetic datum derived from a general adjustment of the first-order level nets of the United States and Canada, formerly called Sea Level Datum of 1929. SELECTED HYDROLOGIC DATA FOR THE MESILLA GROUND-WATER BASIN, 1987 THROUGH 1992 WATER YEARS, DONA ANA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO, AND EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS

By Edward L. Nickerson ABSTRACT The Mesilla ground-water basin monitoring program was established in 1987 to document hydrologic conditions and establish a long-term, continuous data base to permit future quantitative evaluation of the ground-water flow system and stream/aquifer relations. Data collection is divided into three program elements. These are the (1) Mesilla ground-water basin observation-well network; (2) Mesilla Valley hydrologic sections; and (3) Rio Grande seepage investigations. This report is a compilation of hydrologic data collected for the Mesilla ground- water basin monitoring program during the 1987 through 1992 water years. Hydrologic data presented in the report include well records and water levels from 181 wells; mean daily river stage and ground-water levels at 37 sites; seepage investigations of the Rio Grande from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas; and chemical analyses of 29 water samples collected from the Rio Grande.

INTRODUCTION The recent population growth within the Mesilla ground-water basin and adjacent areas has resulted in a significant increase in ground-water withdrawals to meet increasing municipal water demand. In 1983, the U. S. Geological Survey began a study to help define the hydrologic system of the Mesilla ground-water basin in Dona Ana County, New Mexico, and El Paso County, Texas (Nickerson, 1986). The Mesilla ground-water basin study, completed in 1987, identified a significant hydraulic connection between the Rio Grande and the aquifer system (Nickerson, 1989; Nickerson and Myers, 1993).

Historical ground-water data collection efforts within the basin were limited to obtaining data on a nonrecurring, unsystematic basis. Recent studies indicate the need for a comprehensive monitoring network of the ground-water flow system in the basin. The Mesilla ground-water basin monitoring program was established in 1987 to document current ground-water conditions and stream/aquifer relations to identify changes with time. Purpose and Scope The purpose of this report is to present hydrologic data collected for the Mesilla ground- water basin monitoring program during the 1987 through 1992 water years. The report describes the monitoring program established in 1987 to document hydrologic conditions and establish a long-term, continuous data base to permit future quantitative evaluation of the ground-water flow system and stream/aquifer relations.

Description of the Study Area The Mesilla drainage basin is located in Dona Ana County in south-central New Mexico; El Paso County, Texas; and northwestern , Mexico (fig. 1). The Mesilla drainage basin includes the Mesilla ground-water basin and the southern part of the Jornada del Muerto ground-water basin. The study area encompasses most of the Mesilla ground-water basin (fig. 1) the portion that is within the United States. The study area is bounded on the north by the Robledo and Dona Ana Mountains, on the east by the Jornada fault zone and Franklin Mountains, on the south by the United States-Mexico boundary, and on the west by the East Potrillo and West Potrillo Mountains, Aden Hills, Sleeping Lady Hills, and Rough and Ready Hills. The Mesilla ground-water basin in this report refers only to the United States section. The study area is geographically divided into the Mesilla Valley along the Rio Grande in the east, and the West Mesa in the west (fig. 1). The surface of the West Mesa ranges from 300 to 350 feet above the Rio Grande. Most of the population and water use within the basin are in the Mesilla Valley.

Acknowledgments The Mesilla ground-water basin monitoring program is conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the New Mexico State Engineer Office, Elephant Butte Irrigation District, City of Las Cruces, New Mexico State University, El Paso Water Utilities, Jornada Resource Conservation and Development, and International Boundary and Water Commission U.S. Section. Hydrologic data presented in this report were collected by the U.S. Geological Survey with assistance from the New Mexico State Engineer Office, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, and International Boundary and Water Commission U. S. Section.

Well-Numbering Systems Two different systems of numbering wells were used because the study area is located in New Mexico and Texas. The system used by most Federal, State, and municipal agencies in their respective States was used in that part of the study area to ensure consistency. .

, v J ^ l__.r-f i M NEW MEXICO-'V i

MAP AREA

MEXICO El Paso Del Norte' (El Paso Narrows)

0 10 20 MILES I 0 10 20 KILOMETERS

Figure 1.-Location of the study area (from Nickerson and Myers, 1993, fig. 1). New Mexico System The system of numbering wells and springs in New Mexico (fig. 2) is based on the common subdivision of public lands into sections. The well number, in addition to designating the well, locates its position to the nearest 10-acre tract in the land network. The number is divided by periods into four segments. The first segment denotes the township north or south of the New Mexico base line; the second denotes the range east or west of the New Mexico principal meridian; and the third denotes the section. The fourth segment of the number, which consists of three digits, denotes the 160-, 40-, and 10-acre tracts, respectively, in which the well is situated. For this purpose, the section is divided into four quarters, numbered 1,2,3, and 4 in the normal reading order, for the northwest, northeast, southwest, and southeast quarters, respectively. The first digit of the fourth segment gives the quarter section, which is a tract of 160 acres. Similarly, the 160-acre tract is divided into four 40-acre tracts numbered in the same manner, and the second digit denotes the 40-acre tract. Finally, the 40-acre tract is divided into four 10-acre tracts, and the third digit denotes the 10-acre tract. Thus, well 24S.02E.23.342 is in the NE 1 /4 of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, section 23, Township 24 South, Range 02 East. The letters a, b, c, etc. are added to the last segment to designate succeeding wells in the same 10-acre tract. Where sections are irregularly shaped, the well is located on the basis of a regular square-section grid that is superimposed on the irregular section with the southeast corner and eastern section lines matching. The well is then numbered by its location in the superimposed square grid. In valley areas where land grants existed when the public lands were subdivided into sections, the section lines have been extended and the artificial sections numbered.

Texas System In Texas, the well-numbering system used in this report is the same as that used by the Texas Water Development Board (fig. 3). Under this system, which is based on latitude and longitude, each 1-degree quadrangle in the State is given a two-digit number from 01 through 89. These are the first two digits of the well number. El Paso County is in parts of quadrangles 48 and 49. Each 1-degree quadrangle is subdivided into 71/2-minute quadrangles that are given a two-digit number from 01 to 64. These are the third and fourth digits of the well number. Each 71/2-minute quadrangle is further subdivided into 2 1/2-minute quadrangles that are each given a single-digit number ranging from 1 through 9. This is the fifth digit of the well number. Finally, each well within a 2 1/2-minute quadrangle is given a two-digit number in the order in which the well was inventoried, starting with 01. These are the last two digits of the well number. In addition to the seven-digit well number, a two-letter prefix is used to identify the county; the prefix for El Paso County is JL. Thus, well JL-49-12-501 is well number 1 located in the 5th 21/2- minute quadrangle of the 12th 71/2-minute quadrangle in the 49th 1-degree quadrangle, which is in El Paso County (JL). ** *& TO'

Figure 2.-System of numbering wells In New Mexico.

103° 100° LOCATION OF WELL JL-49-12-501

JL PREFIX FOR EL PASO COUNTY 49 1-degree quadrangle 12 7 t/2-mlnute quadrangle s 2 1/2-minute quadrangle 01 Well number within 2 1/2-minut» quadrangle

2f>

1-degree quadrangles

' 2 3 4 * & ' 8

09 10 1) 13 14 IS 16 N^ II

26, 26 21 ^8 29 30 31 32

41 42 43 44 4& 46 47 48

M SO 61 52 b3 64 66 56

s; 58 59 60 61 62 63 64

7 1/2-minute quadrangles 2 1/2-minute quadrangles

Figure 3.--System of numbering weiis in Texas.

5 GEOHYDROLOGIC SETTING The Mesilla ground-water basin primarily consists of a basin-fill aquifer system of unconsolidated alluvial deposits. The aquifer system in the Mesilla ground-water basin is composed of two stratigraphic units: (1) the Quaternary alluvium of the Rio Grande flood plain, and (2) the Santa Fe Group basin fill of Pleistocene to Miocene age (King and others, 1971). The Rio Grande flood-plain alluvium occurs beneath the Mesilla Valley in the eastern part of the basin. The flood-plain alluvium generally ranges in thickness from 50 to 125 feet (Wilson and others, 1981, p. 27) and consists of sand and gravel with lenses of silt and clay (Hawley, 1984). The Santa Fe Group, which extends throughout the basin, consists of clay, silt, sand, gravel, and caliche, and some occasional igneous rocks composed of volcanic ash and basalt. The thickness of the Santa Fe Group ranges from zero to greater than 5,000 feet (Hawley, 1984) within the study area.

Water in storage within the Rio Grande flood-plain alluvium/Santa Fe Group aquifer system occurs under phreatic and leaky-artesian conditions (Nickerson and Myers, 1993). Water in storage within the shallow flood-plain alluvium generally is unconfined and may occur under phreatic (water-table) conditions. Water generally occurs within the Santa Fe Group under leaky- artesian (semiconfined) conditions. The direction of ground-water flow in the study area is south to southeast toward the lower end of the basin.

The Rio Grande enters the Mesilla ground-water basin in the north from Rincon Valley through Selden Canyon and exits to the south at El Paso Narrows (fig. 1). The Rio Grande is predominantly a losing stream along most of the 62-mile reach in the Mesilla Valley and is considered a primary source of recharge to the aquifer (Nickerson and Myers, 1993). The length and seepage rate of losing reaches of the Rio Grande may fluctuate with annual and seasonal variations in streamflow, and with the hydraulic gradient in the surrounding aquifer.

MESILLA GROUND-WATER BASIN MONITORING PROGRAM The Mesilla ground-water basin monitoring program was established in 1987 to document hydrologic conditions and establish a long-term, continuous data base to permit future quantitative evaluation of the ground-water flow system and stream/aquifer relations. Data collection is divided into three program elements. These are the (1) Mesilla ground-water basin observation-well network; (2) Mesilla Valley hydrologic sections; and (3) Rio Grande seepage investigations.

Hydrologic data are presented by water year to facilitate comparison of hydrologic conditions and seasonal events along the Mesilla Valley hydrologic sections. A water year in Geological Survey reports is the 12-month period, October 1 through September 30, and is designated by the calendar year in which it ends. Thus hydrologic data presented for the 1987 through 1992 water years represent October 1,1986, through September 30,1992. Mesilla Ground-Water Basin Observation-Well Network The Mesilla ground-water basin observation-well network was initiated in 1983 to monitor ground-water levels throughout the basin. The network currently consists of 181 water wells that were selected on the basis of geologic unit and location. Network wells are completed in the Rio Grande flood-plain alluvium/Santa Fe Group aquifer system; 129 wells are located in the Mesilla Valley and 52 wells are located in the West Mesa area. The location of network wells is shown in figure 4. Well records, including annual water-level measurements, are listed in table 1 (all tables are in back of report).

Mesilla Valley Hydrologic Sections Three hydrologic sections were constructed in the Mesilla Valley. These hydrologic sections consist of a river-stage station and several observation-well groups aligned perpendicular to the Rio Grande. Each well group consists of several observation wells completed at depths ranging from 35 to 801 feet. The locations of the Las Cruces hydrologic section (A-A'), Mesquite hydrologic section (B-B'), and Canutillo well-field hydrologic section (C-C) are shown in figure 4, and a diagram of each hydrologic section is shown in figures 5-7, respectively. Each well group consists of several observation wells completed at depth intervals ranging from 35 to 801 feet.

Observation wells and river-stage stations at the Mesilla Valley hydrologic sections were equipped with water-level recorders to collect continuous water-level data at 37 sites. Continuous water-level record was terminated at 14 observation wells as of February 1990: LC- 1B, LC-2B, LC-3B, M-1B, M-2B, M-4B, well group CWF-3, and well group CWF-4. Water levels were measured at these wells on a monthly basis thereafter.

Water-level data at the Mesilla Valley hydrologic sections are presented by water year. Data for 1987 water year are presented in figures 10-22, for 1988 water year in figures 23-35, for 1989 water year in figures 36-48, for 1990 water year in figures 49-61, for 1991 water year in figures 62-74, and for 1992 water year in figures 75-87.

Las Cruces Hydrologic Section The Las Cruces hydrologic section (A-A') is at the western edge of the city of Las Cruces, New Mexico (fig. 4). The section consists of a river-stage station on the Rio Grande and three observation-well groups aligned perpendicular to the Rio Grande (fig. 5).

River-stage station The river-stage station, Rio Grande below Picacho Bridge, is located at the Las Cruces hydrologic section (fig. 5). The station is operated by the U.S. Geological Survey to record river stage (water-surface altitude). Hydrographs showing mean daily stage of the Rio Grande below Picacho Bridge during the 1987 through 1992 water years are presented in figures 10,23,36,49, 62, and 75, respectively. lor oo' 106° 45' 106° 30*

A \A' TRACE OF HYDROLOGIC SECTION

COMPLETED IN FLOOD-PLAIN ALLUVIUM COMPLETED IN SANTA FE GROUP WELL GROUP-Multiple wells completed in flood-plflin alluvium and Santa Fe Group

Chamberino Mtj&i \ 128-129 103 X

166-169 170-173 174-177

R.3 W. R.2 W. R.1 W. R.1 E. R.2 E. R.3 E. R.4 E. Base from US Geological Survey MEXICO 1:24,OOO and 1:62.50O scale 10 15 MILES topographic maps

10 IB KILOMETERS

Figure 4.~Location of observation wells and hydrologic sections in the Mesilla ground-water basin. New Mexico and Texas.

8 DISTANCE FROM EAST BANK, IN FEET (NOT TO SCALE) A A 296 0 34 353 6,500

LU Q FEET Q $ .RIVER-STAGE STATION FEET 3,900 - £§ fVLC-1 LC-2 LAND SURFACE LC-3 - 3,900

.LC-1C SI 31 -36 : suo^s LC'3C - SI 40-45 '

3,800 - - 3,800 _LC-1B . LC-2B 'SI 95-100 ^ 'SI 100-105 LC-3B. SI 110-115'

3,700- - 3,700

3,600- - 3,600 - LC-1A LC-2A ' SI 295-300 3" SI 300-305

SI 322-327 3

Location of section shown in figure 4 3,500- - 3,500 Datum is sea level

EXPLANATION

LC-2- WELL GROUP NAME

WELL NAME--|ndividual well LC-2B in group SI 100-105 SCREENED INTERVAL-- In feet below land surface

Figure 5.-Las Cruces hydrologic section (modified from Nickerson, 1986, fig. 8). 9 DISTANCE FROM WEST BANK, IN FEET (NOT TO SCALE)

71 0 154 404 6,200 10,300 i _I B , RIVER-STAGE STATION FEET FEET 3,900 / 2 3,900 M-1 f> §5 M-2 M-3 LAND SURFACE M-4 M-3E M-4C - . M-1C M-2C : SI 30-35 = : SI 30-35 ' SI 35-40 : SI 40-45 3,800- -3,800

M-4B M-18 M-3D .M-28 SI 110-115 - 1SM15-120 ; 'SI 110-115 : SI 113-118 =

3,700- -3,700

3,600 - -3,600 M-3C M-4A M-1A M-2A SI 297-302 ' SI 302-307 ^ SI 310-315 Sl 3°9-31 4

3,500- -3,500

3,400- -3,400

3,300- - 3,300 M-3B Location of section shown in figure 4 - SI 591-596

Datum \» ssa level EXPLANATION

WELL GROUP NAME

NAME- Individual well in group = = SI 310-315 SCREENED INTERVAL-- In feet below lano surface

Figure 6.--Mesquite hydrologic section (modified from Nickerson, 1986, fig. 16).

10 DISTANCE FROM WEST BANK, IN FEET 2,300 (NOT TO SCALE) 528 104 0 183 258

I I I I I I

* UJ ,**t FEET RIVER-STAGE STATIONv g§ FEET 3,800 CWF-4 CWF-3 CWF-2fl*5 CWF-1 I 3.BOO I I U \ 1 - CWF-4A CWF-3A . CWF-2A CWF-1A . 3,700 " SI 52-57 SI 51-58 - = SI 40-45 ' SI 49-60 ' 3.700

_ CWF-4B CWF-3B CWF-2B CWF-1 B 3.600 SI 152-157 SI 151-158 : = SI 151-158 = : SI 149-154- 3.600

3.500 . CWF-4C CWF-3C . CWF-2C 3.500 - SI 292-29 7 SI 291-296 " SI 293-298 - : CWF-1 C . SI 327-332' 3,400 3,400

EXPLANATION 3,300 CWF-1 WPU RBOUP 3,300 , WELL NAME-lndivjdual well _CWF-1A/ in8r°Up 3,200 -SI 49-50- SCREEN INTERVAL-- 3,200 In feet below land surface 3,100

3,000 . CWF-4D CWF-3D . CWF-2D . CWF-1 D 3,000 - SI 792-79'r SI 792-797 -~ SI 792-797 -~ SI 798-80 1 a Location of section shown in figure 4 9 OOO 9 900 Datum is sea level

Figure 7.--Caftutillo well-field hydrologic section (modified from Nickerson, 1986, fig. 27).

11 Well group LC-1 Well group LC-1 consists of three observation wells: LC-1A (23S.lE.22.232a), LC-1B (23S.lE.22.232b), and LC-1C (23S.lE.22.232c). Drilling and construction of well group LC-1 were completed on October 12,1984. Well records are listed by well number in table 1. The screened intervals are from 295 to 300 feet below land surface for well LC-1A, from 95 to 100 feet below land surface for well LC-1B, and from 31 to 36 feet below land surface for well LC-1C (fig. 5). Hydrographs showing mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group LC- 1 during the 1987 through 1992 water years are presented in figures 11, 24, 37, 50, 63, and 76, respectively.

Well group LC-2 Well group LC-2 consists of three observation wells: LC-2A (23S.lE.22.241a), LC-2B (23S.lE.22.241b), and LC-2C (23S.lE.22.241c). Drilling and construction of well group LC-2 were completed on October 22,1984. Well records are listed in table 1. The screened intervals are from 300 to 305 feet below land surface for well LC-2A, from 100 to 105 feet below land surface for well LC-2B, and from 30 to 35 feet below land surface for well LC-2C (fig. 5). Hydrographs showing mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group LC-2 during the 1987 through 1992 water years are presented in figures 12,25,38,51,64, and 77, respectively.

Well group LC-3 Well group LC-3 consists of three observation wells: LC-3A (23S.lE.23.244a), LC-3B (23S.lE.23.244b), and LC-3C (23S.lE.23.244c). Drilling and construction of well group LC-3 were completed on November 26,1984. Well records are listed in table 1. The screened intervals are from 322 to 327 feet below land surface for LC-3A, from 110 to 115 feet below land surface for LC- 3B, and from 40 to 45 feet below land surface for LC-3C (fig. 5). Hydrographs showing mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group LC-3 during the 1987 through 1992 water years are presented in figures 13,26,39,52,65, and 78, respectively.

Rio Grande low-flow station The river-stage station at the Las Cruces hydrologic section, Rio Grande below Rcacho Bridge (321745106492510), was upgraded to a low-flow discharge station during the 1991 through 1992 water years. Discharge measurements were conducted and streamflow records computed for base flow during the nonirrigation season (November through February) when river discharge was less than 100 cubic feet per second. Low-flow discharge records for the 1991 and 1992 water years are presented in tables 2 and 3, respectively.

12 Mesquite Hydrologic Section The Mesquite hydrologic section (B-B') is approximately 5 miles northwest of Mesquite, New Mexico (fig. 4). The section consists of a river-stage station on the Rio Grande and four observation-well groups aligned perpendicular to the Rio Grande (fig. 6).

River-stage station The river-stage station Rio Grande below Mesilla Dam is located at the Mesquite hydrologic section (fig. 6). The station is operated by the U.S. Geological Survey to record river stage. Hydrographs showing mean daily stage of the Rio Grande below Mesilla Dam during the 1987 through 1992 water years are presented in figures 14,27,40,53,66, and 79, respectively.

Well group M-l Well group M-l consists of three observation wells: M-1A (24S.2E.19.214a), M-1B (24S.2E.19.214b), and M-1C (24S.2E.19.214c). Drilling and construction of well group M-l were completed on November 14,1983. Well records are listed in table 1. The screened intervals are from 310 to 315 feet below land surface for well M-l A, from 115 to 120 feet below land surface for well M-1B, and from 35 to 40 feet below land surface for well M-1C (fig. 6). Hydrographs showing mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group M-l during the 1987 through 1992 water years are presented in figures 15,28,41,54,67, and 80, respectively.

Well group M-2 Well group M-2 consists of three observation wells: M-2A (24S.2E.19.223a), M-2B (24S.2E.l9.223b), and M-2C (24S.2E.19.223c). Drilling and construction of well group M-2 were completed on December 5,1984. Well records are listed in table 1. The screened intervals are from 309 to 314 feet below land surface for well M-2A, from 110 to 115 feet below land surface for well M-2B, and from 40 to 45 feet below land surface for well M-2C (fig. 6). Hydrographs showing mean daily water levels in well group M-2 during the 1987 through 1992 water years are presented in figures 16,29,42,55,68, and 81, respectively.

Well group M-3 Well group M-3 consists of four observation wells: M-3B (24S.2E.17.423b), M-3C (24S.2E.17.423c), M-3D (24S.2E. 17.423d), and M-3E (24S.2E.17.423e). Drilling and construction of well group M-3 were completed as part of a previous study (Wilson and White, 1984). Water levels in well group M-3 were measured on an annual basis. Well records and annual water levels are listed in table 1. The screened intervals in the wells are from 591 to 596 feet below land surface for well M-3B, from 302 to 307 feet below land surface for well M-3C, from 113 to 118 feet below land surface for well M-3D, and from 30 to 35 feet below land surface for well M-3E (fig. 6).

13 Well group M-4 Well group M-4 consists of three observation wells: M-4A (24S.2E.16.124a), M-4B (24S.2E.16.124b), and M-4C (24S.2E.16.124c). Drilling and construction of well group M-4 were completed on December 8, 1983. Well records are listed in table 1. The screened intervals are from 297 to 302 feet below land surface for well M-4A, from 110 to 115 feet below land surface for well M-4B, and from 30 to 35 feet below land surface for well M-4C (fig. 6). Hydrographs showing mean daily water levels in well group M-4 during the 1987 through 1992 water years are presented in figures 17,30,43,56,69, and 82, respectively.

Canutillo Well-Field Hydrologic Section The Caftutillo well-field hydrologic section (C-C) is within the city of El Paso's Caftutillo well field approximately 3 miles north of Canutillo, Texas (fig. 4). The section consists of a river- stage station on the Rio Grande and four observation-well groups aligned perpendicular to the Rio Grande (fig. 7).

River-stage station The river-stage station Rio Grande below Vinton Bridge is at the Canutillo well-field hydrologic section (fig. 7). The station is operated by the U.S. Geological Survey to record river stage. Hydrographs showing mean daily stage of the Rio Grande below Vinton Bridge during the 1987 through 1992 water years are presented in figures 18,31,44,57,70, and 83, respectively.

Well group CWF-1 Well group CWF-1 consists of four wells: CWF-1A (JL 49-04-478), CWF-1B (JL 49-04-479), CWF-1C (JL 49-04-480), and CWF-1D (JL 49-04-481). Drilling and construction of well group CWF-1 were completed on February 13, 1985. Well records are listed in table 1. The screened intervals are from 45 to 50 feet below land surface for well CWF-1A, from 149 to 154 feet below land surface for well CWF-1B, from 327 to 332 feet below land surface for well CWF- 1C, and from 796 to 801 feet below land surface for well CWF-1D (fig. 7). Hydrographs showing mean daily water levels in well group CWF-1 during the 1987 through 1992 water years are presented in figures 19,32,45,58,71, and 84, respectively.

Well group CWF-2 Well group CWF-2 consists of four observation wells: CWF-2A (JL 49-04-474), CWF-2B (JL 49-04-475), CWF-2C (JL 49-04-476), and CWF-2D (JL 49-04-477). Drilling and construction of well group CWF-2 were completed on January 30, 1985. Well records are listed in table 1. The screened intervals are from 40 to 45 feet below land surface for well CWF-2A, from 151 to 156 feet below land surface for well CWF-2B, from 293 to 298 feet below land surface for well CWF-2C, and from 792 to 797 feet below land surface for well CWF-2D (fig. 7). Hydrographs showing mean daily water levels in well group CWF-2 during the 1987 through 1992 water years are presented in figures 20,33,46,59,72, and 85, respectively.

14 Well group CWF-3 Well group CWF-3 consists of four observation wells: CWF-3A (JL 49-04-470), CWF-3B (JL 49-04-471), CWF-3C (JL 49-04-472), and CWF-3D (JL 49-04-473). Drilling and construction of well group CWF-3 were completed on January 10, 1985. Well records are listed in table 1. The screened intervals are from 51 to 56 feet below land surface for well CWF-3A, from 151 to 156 feet below land surface for well CWF-3B, from 291 to 296 feet below land surface for well CWF-3C, and from 792 to 797 feet below land surface for well CWF-3D (fig. 7). Hydrographs showing mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group CWF-3 during the 1987 through 1992 water years are presented in figures 21,34,47, 60, 73, and 86, respectively.

Well group CWF-4 Well group CWF-4 consists of four observaUon wells: CWF-4A (JL 49-04-466), CWF-4B (JL 49-04-467), CWF-4C (JL 49-04-468), and CWF-4D (JL 49-04-469). Drilling and construction of well group CWF-4 were completed on December 4, 1984. Well records are listed in table 1. The screened intervals are from 52 to 57 feet below land surface for well CWF-4A, from 152 to 157 feet below land surface for well CWF-4B, from 292 to 297 feet below land surface for well CWF-4C, and from 792.5 to 797.5 feet below land surface for well CWF-4 (fig. 7). Hydrographs showing mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group CWF-4 during the 1987 through 1992 water years are presented in figures 22,35,48,61,74, and 87, respectively.

Rio Grande Seepage Investigations Seepage investigations of the Rio Grande at low flow were conducted during the 1988 through 1992 water years to document river gain/loss including associated surface-water quality and shallow ground-water levels. Discharge measurements were conducted at approximately 34 sites along a 62-mile reach from the Rio Grande below Leasburg Dam, New Mexico, to the Rio Grande at El Paso, Texas (fig. 8). Specific conductance and water temperature were determined during discharge measurements. Water samples were collected for chemical analyses at six river sites to determine dissolved solids and concentrations of major ions, selected nutrients, and selected trace elements. Water levels were measured in approximately 50 shallow observation wells completed in the Rio Grande flood-plain alluvium.

The locations of discharge measurement sites, water-quality sites, and observation wells selected for the Rio Grande seepage investigations are shown in figure 8. Specific results of individual seepage investigations conducted on January 5-6,1988, January 10-11,1989, January 9-10,1990, January 8-9,1991, and December 17,1991, are presented by water year in tables 4,5,6, 7, and 8, respectively. River miles are referenced upstream from the Rio Grande at El Paso, Texas, which is designated as river mile 1,249.9 (Hendricks, 1964). Indicated gain or loss of streamflow during seepage investigations of the Rio Grande from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, is shown in figure 9. Chemical analyses of water samples collected from the Rio Grande during seepage investigations are listed in table 9. Water levels in selected observation wells completed in the shallow flood-plain alluvium during Rio Grande seepage investigations are listed in table 10.

15 107° 00' 106° 30' 106? 45*

DISCHARGE MEASUREMENT SITE-- Number refera to tibia 4-8

OBSERVATION WELL- Number refera to table 10

R.3 W. R.2 W. R.1 W. R.1 E. R.2 E. R.3 E. R.4 E. Base from US. Geological Survey MEXICO 1:24.000 and 1:62,5OO scale 10 IS MILES topographic maps J

10 IS KILOMETERS

Figure 8.--Location of discharge measurement sites, water-quality sites, and selected observation wells during seepage investigations of the Rio Grande from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, 1988 through 1992 water years.

16 SITE NUMBER 1 2 8 10 12 13 14 16 17 29 3134 30

Q Z O 20 - O UJ w cc UJ Q. 10 -

UJ UJ

O GO O Z

CO CO O

DC O Z

C3 UJ EXPLANATION January 5-6, 1988; initial discharge 95.1 cubic feet per second | January 10-11, 1989; initial discharge 33.1 cubic feet per second S January 9-10. 1990; initial discharge 37.8 cubic feet per second O January 6-9. 1991; initial discharge 38.4 cubic feet per second December 17. 1991; initial discharge 43.2 cubic feet per second

1.315 1,310 1,305 1,300 1,295 1,290 1,285 1,280 1,275 1,270 1,265 1,260 1,255 1,250 1,245 RIVER MILE Figure 9.--Indicated gain or loss of streamflow during seepage investigations of the Rio Grande from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, 1988 through 1992 water years. 1987 WATER YEAR

18 DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET RIVER STAGE, IN FEET

N>C£.tbOlO>VIODCO CQ CQ T T T c c "^ CD CD 5 O o - z co Q i oo Ip ' O) * CD o * o . <' o 3 CD Q. 0) CD 3 if I \>y CT Q. CD 03 o> =: > ^ z

O CD CD CD 1 a> O CD" 3- to O CQ cp_ CD CD CO OL CO CD (O 0

_ . 00 CQ ^1 o ^

T3 m 3 Q. o CD

CT

CD 00

O to 0) r- o CD 3- "oou u u u u u u u u u "oou o u u u 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 oo oo oo oo 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 VI 00 00 o> 00 00 00 00 00 00 CD oo oo oo 03 00 03 00 03 00 CD 00 CO o ^* u * Ol O) 00 \ o u en O) CO 0) Q.'

CQ ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET CD ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET M M II IV) O c1 0) 0) *roocpo>»roc

1 V _ . _ ro -. Z X** M , M > OJ , 0 0 o D) Q) m 1 3 3 O \ 1 1 _ Q. Q. 1 Q) c. 1 1 5T Z

n - < QJ -n Q) m *+ m CD (D to O z 1 ( 5' TJ f' ro 31 o \

i 0 z \ ^^ 5 5 o m

c. O o c .. i 1 t CO ro 5 f'' J ^ r (O (O c i, 09 00 vt vt o \ .' ' ' x ^-*

J (D M m » s TJ \ ' / OP o> ^ O s 3 8 -j 0 C MM 01 (n *. 10 o a> (0 to c I ' I 1 ' ' i [i -**;' c ^ CD

cn - z

i Sm 5^"» 00S o 00 S O CD ^ tu ~* tU tu S 5 a.2 a ^ a CD tu * = cr tu «< CD

tu «< CD CO CD ~« ^ CD SJ W W CD tt (O tu CD CD w O tu ro 3 CD

CD W

1,1 u u u CD OD OD a CO CO o 00 00 OD OD 0> U U U U *. *. 01 cn cn cn 0) 01 01 01 Ol Ol Ol Ol U 01 to -* to -» u to C* «. 01 o» torjtotototototoiotototototo 3 ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET M O CQ C 1 ' 1 CD

o> Sg 0)

n> 0) CD CD

5T SL CD CO 3T a 5 ro 3J ro * CD

to CQ o 5 co Co

ro

(O (O 00

O O to 01 CD CD

1 1 1 1 1 ea "0ea CD ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ea e» at 01 e> e> *. en ea S 2 2 2 8 5 en en en en «j ID -A ea en «J klfuk>tv}tvlk>k>klk> M ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET RIVER STAGE, IN FEET (Q

CD O -». O 09 -I

O>

_

«< S w

CD

O

** 3" ro CD 5 3 Q. CD

< £ 5' O

CD i . i "9f\ .1,1.1 ^ u U Q. Vi >i >i Vi >i M CO o» o» OB

ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET

ro

~a>w w w u u u u u u u u CD u u u w u u u u u u

CQ

CD I\J ro

2 CD 03 3 Q. 03

03 CD

CD < CD_ V)

N> Ol CD

3 C T> O

Tl i *.

<0 00 -si

03 CD ^ < CD 03 ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET 1988 WATER YEAR

26 DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET RIVER STAGE, IN FEET CO c ^ CO g O ' CD ^< o>

0) **

°S O o r- O a « cr o

m "Tl OJ S. m 05 A oo ^ 3"

5. u> M

09

(O to 09 09 09 09

OJ OJ ** U U U 0» CD CD CD CD CD o o CD

ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET RIVER STAGE, IN FEET 10 MMM->->-*-»-> Tl a CO C ^ O 3 a> g ro ro o < o o -* 0) o 0) <0 3 m 3 00 o a. 00 Q. 0) c_ 5'3

O 0) m ^ m 0) o 3 Q. 9 » 0> CO o- 2. o 2. CA o ro T3

__ ID 3 £ a CO " O 3 O O o C ^ 0) o 0) 3 3 Q. O o-

ma 0) u u u u u a a a a a a o u O 01 01 o> w u S 0) o to s at 3 »J »j ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET

co o

ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET 10 3.775.1

3.774.1 (_ LU LU 3.773.1 u-

LU 7 3.772.1 -J HI Rio Grande below Vinton Bridge LU £ 6 3.771.1 _l < LU LU i ' 3,770.1 CO LU CO > 3,769.1 O DC * QQ LU > DC 3 3.768.1 g

3,787.1 p _l

3,788.1

3,785.1 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1987 1988 Figure 31. Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Vinton Bridge, 1988 water year, o 3.776.7

CWF-1 UJ 10 3,786.7 t- LU LU LL CWF-1B LU n 20 3,758.7

LU o 30 3.746.7

QC LU 40 CWF-1C 3.738.7 CO LU O 50 3,728.7 w LU

60 3.718.7 § I < LU 70 3,708.7 y CD

80 3,898.7 CL LU O 90 3,888.7

100 3,878.7 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1987 1988 Figure 32. Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-1, 1988 water year.

31 DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET

o -j 0) g 0) en u ro to o o o o o O O CQ o o o o o o c C 3 o CO o CO -I GO CO CO o O -go> ^ s Tl CO CD > 71 ; ." 3 m iA |/s o Q. Q. 0> 0>

£ -" 0> »« a,m

CO 2. s 2. «I< n o) I 1 O O - 5

ro

-^ >

w u u w w o> o> O) 0) -g g g Vi i -j g g 0) O) O) g Vi -g -g Vi g g g o> g 0) 10 o *. b) b) b) 0> in in ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET o a> en OJ to CO o o o o o o o c o

00 Ul

CD 0)

Q. 0)

0) »* CD

CD <

CO 00

-i o> O co

O

-i. >

0) CD I i I i I Tt I i I 1---.V.-J.V.V.V' 1,1', u u 0> 0> o> Vj 0> CD p O O o p o p p o o p 0) b> b> O) b> b> ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET 1989 WATER YEAR

34 DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET RIVER STAGE, IN FEET CO

(D O CO O CO O O H CD (D CO-g s (D 00 Q) 3 Q. o Q) (D m O Q) m o O

0. Q) (D ^ o (A 5T Q Q) (Q ^ m (D m 0) CD CD 3 O Q. (D (D < (D 2. w 3J O Q CO 0) 01 3 O Q. (D Q) O o- 3-

(O (D 00 Q) (O

o u Q) 00 oo o> oo 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 5> 00 00 00 oo 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 oo 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 oo 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 (D Q) ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET ro ro *. ro 00 00 O CO CO M O CO CD *. M O Ti 1 ' 1 CO.' 0 CO O O C O c -1 CD CD . I ^ '' CO CO -» z ? CO 00 (D o (D 09 £~ f CO i 09 ^ >^ co i _ o o j CD w CD a CD O CD m rv m CD O o o 9 99 Q. Q. ro ro ro CD Q> c. > CD O Z X X -n Si m / ® CD-^ CD 1 N CD" CD" " \ s 2 k v cp_ cp_ \ o> D w : i 5' _ ,' 33 CO en 2. CD / / CO CO -» > CD < o 3 -< O 09 f c CO c CD ~j CD - TJ TJ c. |- C Z o O m I CO N> - - c. _,. C co CO CO 00 5 CO CO - . :: CD c <-* Si o CD o CD _ ' t* ^ CO CD CD -am / CD CD -i ^ ,1,1, , i , i , i/ , i /r i , i ,

"j

ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET RIVER STAGE, IN FEET Tl CO* CO C c ^ O ^ CD CD O

S00 S o oo CD CD O -i. ja SO m 5'33 CD -«

Q) m 0 ^* ro m ^ CD CD ro Q) so 3 0. CD CD < CO u CD CD CT cp_ -o o 3J CD CD « - I 3J - oo (D

CD_ CD O 00 > CO

CD 03 CO ^* m CD o o

CD O9COO9O9COCOO9O9GO O CO CO u u Q) ~oo 03 oo 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 oo 00 oo 00 00 00 00 oo oo 09 CO CO O9 ^ ^ UI UI UI VI UI 4k U1 U1 U1 Ol 01 ui Ol ^ CO -^ CO -* Cd Ol ~*l (D 3 at 00 CO O -" ro a 01 01 ki ki ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET

CQ CQ c C t O o O CD o CD

CO -i 2 ro * £ <

CD CD 05 a 05 D 3 m m o O Q. a. 05 05 > z n 05 n 05 I f m CD* m CD ^ i cb" cb~ s s: > > cp_ 3) cp_ 3) CO CO -0 CO 5' 00

CD S cp_ -i > a>si CQ a> CQ

CO CO 00 00 CO c CO C o CD

05 05 0) I f CO f* m CD -om CD TJ

CO CO CO CO U u u u CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CD "co "co CD CO 00 CO a> a> CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 05 t. 01 01 05 CO CO en en en en en u en u VI <0 CO en to co en iu iu iu iu iu iu iu iu iu iu iu iu ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET RIVER STAGE, IN FEET

o 00 a> u N> -* (Q o o o o O O c (D O O

Ol

> z

0> CD m -n m CD"

CD 3) OT

TJ CO 3J

_L > (Q to < -1 g> 'O <° i o m

> CO CO O CO at 0) -om ^* (D u U U U U u u U U U U u u u " M ~~4 "~4 "-4 "~4 "~4 a. Vl >i -si Vl ~4 CD o> a> o> Vi (Q O> O> O> O> a> >i >l >l >l >l >l o> o u o> cn O> -*l 00 to o 7* N> U *- Ol 0) o> o> o> O> o> O> o> O> (D ~4 ^1 ~4 ~4 ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET ca'Tl o tO CD at en CO M -" CQ o O O o o o O O C 1 I 'Jsr" IJ...:^-' ^ CD o (D O o o

O)

GO CD CD (D 0) 3 a a m m Q. o Q. o

<" <" > z 0> i I- CD m CD m ^ 03 CD CD" CD" s cp_ > cp_ 33 o> CO 3 3 TJ T) 3D 3) cp_ cp_

CQ CQ CD O (O O (O C C c_ T3 C T3 C Z Z m m O O

-n n c. i i C CO ro

CO CO c C 00 o oo CD (O CO

CO S CO m m £. TJ I- TJ aT CD i CO CO "o>CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 'atCO ~atCO Vj --j (D -j O) O) Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi at at vi vi CD -^ CD (O o ^L IV) u » en at -^ 0) at CD CO en at -j u u CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO en en en en en en en en en en en b> CD CD CD ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET (Q -iC CD -tv 00

(D SO 3 Q. SO

SO I-* CD -^

CD < 5L CO

3 5 CD.

(Q -^ O C T3 O

(O 00 (O so f-t- CD

(D SO

ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET 1990 WATER YEAR

42 10 3,890.7 LU 3,889.7

8 Rio Grande below Picacho Bridge 3,888.7 LU _J LU 7 3,887.7 ^ LL LU ? 6 3,886.7 -1 < LU LU 3,885.7 CO LU CO 4 3,884.7 ^ tr CO 3,883.7 "* LU 3,882.7 3 K 3,881.7 [^ < 3,880.7 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1989 1990 Figure 49.--Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Picacho Bridge, 1990 water year.

h- u 0,000.0 LU I h- LU LLJ LL 1 3,887.6 LU ^L Z 2 _ _ 3,886.6 . LU _J O 3 _ 3,885.6 LU ^i 1 .- - *_ '/» ,'» tr '--' ,' o ^'/'V- . ,~> ;' LU 4 ; -, , .--' ° " ;. " ' ^ K- 3,884.6 -1 CO ,o/ ^,"^^'o" '""-'' d\;;- LU Q 5 /" / - 3,883.6 CO ^- >.^. ^ LC-IC N. i: LU-1tc . bR' LU 6 3,882.6 > ! O CO LC-1 B O 7 3,881.6 < _J IS ^ f^jS LU LU ^ *~~~N^'^>«-^^v^_^_^ y'*^ CO 8 ^~/ ^^^^ / 3,880.8 9 ( I *" LC~ 1 A h- 3,879.6 [- 0. 9 LU - < Q 10 i i I i i i i i i i i 3.878.6

OCT NOV DEC* JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1989 1990

Figure 50.-Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group LC-1, 1990 water year. _

43 DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET

CO 10 10 ca 1o -t.-t.-t.-t.-t. C 10 O c (3 CD en A 10 o co en A 10 c CD CD 1 1 ' 1 ' /I ' 1 ' 1 ' J ' I/' 1 1 ' 1 ' O 0 Ol O Ol 0 (^ :; / N> H i 7 / i i j ^ _^ Z 1 i CD £ o CD g < 0 0 CD 3 CO 3 - !9 CO 10 10 10 > CO 0 a ^J * O m 0) m o 5 C!F O o> __ _ CD $ c_ J , ( ?l z CD < -i CD ~* - - CD _ n n 0) CD 0) CD -i < m m \ CO 7" < CO / 2 ' CD^ I IP- j 0>- ~« - 01 CO \ \ 5. 0) 0) V ^ \ X X \ CL ~ s co'3 O 01 TJ 3) O 0 X cp_ 2L . i nT nT s 3 H3 i. ^ CD CD ^ f f CO CD CO cp_ ^ mo m { o ^ ca H ca H 1,1,11,1,1,1,: i r i , i , o CO CO co co co CO CO o j> CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 0 c "on "on " a CO CO CO co 00 CO c 00 ^30 00 C T3 o> o> T3 T> 5 5 5 g 00 00 00 C en co on CD B o 10 A en co o IO A CD 0 Nl si si O O I CO ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET rb ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET 12 3,856.7 I- 11 3,855.7 uJ LL 10 Rio Grande below Mesilla Dam 3,854.7 Z I- LLJ UJ 9 3,853.7 Q] LL > ? 8 3,852.7 _|

LU 3,851.7 UJ CO UJ r 3,850.7 > CO 6 O DC m UJ 3,849.7 < > DC UJ 4 3,848.7 Q

3 3,847.7

2 _i___i 1 1 I 1 1 3,846.7 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1989 1990 Figure 53.--Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Mesilla Dam, 1990 water year.

0 3,859.2 UJ UJ 3,857.2 UJ LL 2 UJ LL 4 3,855.2 M-1C oUJ 6 3,853.2 8 3,851.2 UJ DC 3,849.2 UJ 3 10 CO 3,847.2 12 UJ Q CO Z 14 3,845.2 UJ 16 3,843.2 o 3,841.2 CD O 18 < UJ 20 3,839.2 UJ CD Q I 22 3,837.2 Q. 24 3,835.2 UJ Q 26 -" I I I I I______I______L_ 3,833.2 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1989. 1990

Figure 54. Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group M-1, 1990 water year.

45 I \ I I I

837.2 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT

Figure 55.-Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group M-2, 1990 water year. in 3,853.5 LJLJ UJ UJ LL 10 M-4C 3,851.5 UJ o UJ < ,M-4B 3,849.5 ccLL 12 UJ D CO UJ i " 3,847.5 CO UJ > O I 3,845.5 CQ UJ UJ m Q 3,843.5

Q_ UJ < 20 3,841.5 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1989 1990

Figure 56.-Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group M-4, 1990 water year.

46 DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET RIVER STAGE, IN FEET O(ocD^jcncn-^coio-*- ooooooooooo CQ C I ' I J I" CQ O CD O C O O H CD CJ1

Ol -> Z 00 CD(O yo (O£ "^9 0 - / Oo CD _L Q) CD CO =1 O 0> CO m O 5 O 0- o Q. 0> O-* SO CD ^ =1 S» Q. CD CD CD 0) V) CT CD" 5 i ** ' 0) (Q CD CD (ft

=1 O CD CD 3

CQ 3J 03 o 3 (O c o B! T3 (Q Q\ CD O 0> =1 Q. CD

CT CD co CO o § 0> r-*- CD O =1

CD 03 0> CO co co co CO Vi Vi Vi ~j -si -si -si -si -si -si -si a> -si (Q en o> O> CO cn -si -si -si -si cn cn CO -si CD (O CO cn o> cn'-si cn CD cn o to cn ^

ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET H 0 3,773.5 UJ i 1 ii ii UJ CWF-2A ,A~^^^>*. " ^.« rx~ UJ U. 10 3,763.5 UJ z - - . CWF-2B. - r»c« E ^ . 20 """'\ ...... 3 ,/dO.d UJ o ~ " _T < 30 ,' . A" 3,743.5 UJ LL - ' ',' ,"« " ii . 1 QC UJ 1 . ''Vjf 3 40 CWF-2C 1 %; ? ,;i. -! '4, \ },> ::,: /«,' 3,733.5 -1 1 n CO 1 . i .'l O so "v i 1 ,"| 3,723.5 CO i k,1 1 f-g*/V» H IP- -r1 \". 1 . t V . H, , A /* UJ < ^.s,-. ' A%1 M _l 60 1 3,713.5 > ^1 v\ 1 VI r\*Vi 1 rvw f O ,^l / m O 70 '*! i f j !\ * 3,703.5 < UJ n UJ i i . ' i 11 m ao ^\U iI 1 illN< \/>l , _ 3.693.5 O I ^ j /-,! ' , . K t 90 r\/vj vV'X-J CWF-2D' v; 1 _ 3,683.5 (- UJ VJ LJ < Q 100 i_____1 | i i i i 1 1 1 i 3.673.5 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUQ SEPT 1989 1990

Figure 59.-Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-2, 1990 water year.

w r / r w , w t= h^ 10 ^_' ' ' '. .'.__ ^cwfl-3N l o ' 2 ' « : 3,763.6 ^> r.-.....------.------"\ ^ A a i . UJ z 20 3 , 7C4/ dO.D a UJ* |7 v CWF-3B t it - 3,743.6 O 30 i / ii < i ji n< UJ _ , <1 ' >i iI* '' ii in j _ OC 40 M! ,' ' ' Li 1^rN \wc or'^ 3,733.8 UJ 3 t- '. ,"J ; v' ' D » 50 r ; r-,.y"! / A! vv Lf^ n " 3,723.8 0 UJ k ^ " ' s ' ,' M! A' w a " CO 3,713.8 1" r^'V-- VT MI ° . - UJ 5 70 3,703.6 o O r r-\ /" i i i NK + + m -1 60 i i M.,1 | \WF.,D f : 3,693.8 < UJ UJ m o I 90 3,663.6 M~\ M j1 1AA j1 v/" ^x, : h- L v/ j wvy CL 100 3,673.6 UJ Q 1ln __ _i _i _ _ i i i i i i i i 3.663.6 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1989 1990

Figure 60.-Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels In well group CWF-3, 1990 water year.

48 UJ 0 3,770.6 ._ __ 1 /CWF-4A ' ' ' o ' o ' 0 ' 'o- LU UJ -.. LL LLJ 10 ...... - ' 2 " ** 3,760.6 z - CWF-4B _ 20 3,750.6 LU ; O 1 ~ LLJ 30 3,740.6 > LL , ' CWF-4C 0 LLJ DC " ; A ^D 40 !! A 3,730.6 CO - -t: f / V o ? + : LLJ 50 3,720.6 CO LANDBELOW LLJ 60 3,710.6 ii'.', i-",'j/' n i;J i! ;( i, r^-1 ^ "*" 4- n1 ' - O -\<> ",' \ DO A ',:!'< . 70 / 1 j ° 3,700.6 < -\" N LLJ / \ Q 80 i \ J- i 3,690.6 \ \ I CWF^LK 1^ T I X/"V--./ I

D_ 90 """ - 3,680.6 LU - - i i i i i i i i O * rtrt i 1 O C-7A C OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1989 1990

Figure 61.-Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group CWF-4, 1990 water year.

49 1991 WATER YEAR

50 10 3,890.7 h- 9 3,889.7 LU U. 8 3,888.7 z LU LU 7 3,887.7 Rio Grande below Picacho Bridge LU > 6 3,886.7 LU LU (D 5 3,885.7 LU CO £ CO 4 3,884.7 > DC O LU 3 3,883.7 LU 2 3,882.7 Q h- 1 3,881.7 fl < 3,880.7

OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1990 1991 Figure 62.--Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Picacho Bridge, 1991 water year.

h- 0 LU I LU LU 4 3,887.6 LU LL 1 LL 3,886.6 LU _J O 3,885.6 LU LL LU DC 3,884.6 ' CO LU Q 3,883.6 CO LU 3,882.6 > m O 3,881.6 < LU LU m s 3,880.6 Q LC-1A 3,879.6 H LU 10 3,878.6 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1990 1991

Figure 63. --Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group LC-1, 1991 water year. 51 11111111 0,000 ' ' 1- Ill " 111 111 LL 2 3,886 111 LL Z - _ 4 3,884 Z '^ -\ iiT LC-2C _. . _'x^-'--' v - -..'-.-,' > ,-._ _J o X v..,--" - 6 3,882 111 LL - DC 111 13 8 -o 0 LC-2B\ o o o o o a- 3,880 CO 0 0 \0 111 Q 10 3,878 CO Z - - 111 _ 1 12 _ 3,876 .^^ - - o ^ m 14 LC- 2A\ 3,874 o "" ->-^ __ 111 \ /^~\^-^/^^ - in m ^-^__^. ^ -^ ^V_A Q 16 3,872 13 ii- _ _ 1- Q. 18 3,870 Ill b Q 20 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n oc o OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1990 1991

Figure 64. --Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group LC-2, 1991 water year. i- 10 1 1 i i i i i i i i 3,879 iii 7 H in 111 LL 111

Z 12 3,877 7 z - iiT _J o 14 - - 3,875 7 lil

111 DC 1 o_3C * ~" ~>*~ '»' ' O v ^j. "^ 13 fc'~~~~ ~ CO 16 ^"-^^ 1 3,873 7 < 111 Q ~t>~L^ .--'" CO ~ "* ^ ^ ^ -, / ~O 18 "^ "--^-^ ~"O~~ ,---. ._--'~O" ' ^-s~^- 3,871 7 ^^ ! ~~'~~-O ~- T ^i /W'«/irT( ' o ^ "^~ ^-^ - .yv^^ m 20 3,869 7 < 3 LC-3*' in m - Q - - i-i 22 3,867 7 K Q_ J3 in ^ Q 24 i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3.865 7 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1990 1991

Figure 65.-Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group LC-3, 1991 water year. 52 DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET RIVER STAGE, IN FEET CQ C IV) IV) IV) IV) -* -L ^ O> -U N> O O> O> CD O) O O CQ- 8 CD CD 3 z Q. » -. CD CD ^ CT m -i CD m CD_ cp_ CD ^ CD co O ^ 0) CD r-fr P> s m Q) S. =, CQ > Q. 33 CD 33 CD co co aT ui TJ o 3J CO cp_ CD o nT 0) 3 33 3 CD O C. co c_ C D> C Z B> m CD I

CD CD_ CO

CD CO

CD_ 5T CO CO m m O TJ CO V O 3 C co CO co co co CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO "coCO "coCO 00 CO CO co co co co co GO GO co GO GO GO GO cn cn cn cn cn cn cn CO CO CO CO * * cn cn cn cn cn cn o co cn co co cn -J co -*

UJ 3,853.2 o LJJ > 3,851.2 LJJ

CO 10 3,849.2 LJJ Q CO Z 12 3,847.2 LJJ

14 3,845.2 O m O < 16 3,843.2 LJJ LJJ Q m 18 3,841.2

Q_ 20 3,839.2 LJJ I______I Q 22 3,837.2 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1990 1991 Figure 68.--Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group M-2, 1991 water year.

3,853.5

LJJ Q 3,843.5 =3

3,841.5 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1990 1991 Figure 69.-Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group M-4, 1991 water year.

54 DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET RIVER STAGE, IN FEET ocDCD-Nicnen-gtcoro-i CQ ooooooooooo C -i CD O CQ O c * CD

-» Z CD O T" O £ S < 0 0 o CD 5 03 O 3 0 m CD o _L (a O CL co a "1 SO co 03 -t a. 3 Q. 03 CD a- 03 l t- Tl CD Z c CD m Q)

CD < 03 CO CD ~1 » ' 03 CQ CD Ol CD Ol 1 CD CL ca ® _ CD CO = 5 -i CO ZD ^ O O C c T3 Z m O ol

CL C|- CD

CT « > CO C o c CO Q < Q

CO m 03 o CD O 3

CO CO CO CO CO CD ->i ->i Vi Vi CD >! en en en o> en 0> en en o> N> 03 CL CQ ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET CD ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL, IN FEET 1 " i T 1 1 I 1 | 1 /o.o 111 ' CWF-2A^ 111 ~-\_ __^ v ^ ^^ -^^-^>^i< >**. *^^- 111 UL 10 ^^-= 3 , TRQ/ Oi^.O K 111 Z - UL CWF-2B^ ~ 20 n~ 3,753.5 X 111 /^ A\\ J , i ~ ^ /\/'r i V rfl i*\ ( '«'i o f . ' \ / 1' 'i T" < 30 ' ' ' / ' ^"' i J4 A i\ . '^ 3,743.5 111 UL j ' i ' I ' ''/' \ 1 'l ' '1 'i i i V Jl , ~\ 1 1 > 1 't|V_ f / '1 "? « ! ' ' ' i *>' CC -j- [l'1'/* f I''1'1' ?jL' 111 3 40 \t \ '' 3,733.5 i A 'I' > VI 1 il CO , ;. CWF-2D\ 'i/' /,' \ ^ 111 I' ' '' t- ' r / 1 1L 1 r'V -/I / v\j ''' l:] D 50 _ i V in '' f' V _ 1 i'^"\ 3,723.5 Z " i i.,^; '\ i f ' 1 1 ' \ < / V1 / V _J i ' * I/I 1 1 1 i 1 ' 1 111 1 v- ^J ' ',^ _ 1 ! / SVJi j -1 60 \ i <"' \' II/ i 1 11 nl / 3,713.5 > CWF-2C-^ J 1 O - CD O 70 M!¥' J 3,703.5 < 111 ^ 111 CO 80 \ V _ 3,693.5 X - - D - CL 90 M 3,683.5 111 - - ^ mn i i 1 i i i i i a R7.i s OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1990 1991

Figure 72.-Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-2, 1991 water year.

u ii i i i i i i i i 3,1 ia. a 111 h- LU III 10 ,CWF-3A o 3,763.8 LL a oo g n ooooo 111 LL 20 - ^ CWF - 3Ba ° "3. 3,753.8 Z 111 O 30 t 3,743.8 _J A A. 111 UL CC 40 + - 3,733.8 111 D CO 50 3,723.8 + + ^ A + A Q 111 ^\ «...- A CO Z CWF-3C 60 3,713.8 111 -i- -

70 ~~ A ~ 3,703.8 o CD A ^f 80 -J- 3,693.8 ^ 111 ~^^~"C WF-3D LU CD Q 90 3,683.8 I D t Q_ 100 - 3,673.8 111 < Q nn ii > i i i i * i i 3 RR3 fl OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1990 1991 Figure 73.--Miscellaneous water levels in well group CWF-3, 1991 water year.

56 \J u, / / w.w HI - 0-CWF-4A HI o o o R o ° o o o HI 10 8 " a a a n a 3,760.6 HI LL o\ n n Z CWF-4B . _ 20 -K 3,750.6 LU 0 30 _ _ 3,740.6 HI LL A. > cc HI 40 _ A + A + 3,730.6 CO - - HI - Q 50 3,720.6 CO z + A A + A HI -J 60 - 3,710.6 > A ~~ O > A + m - o 70 - -^ CWF . 4D 3,700.6 - - LU HI m 80 3,690.6 Q =>

90 - - 3,680.6 Q. LU - - Q mn I i I I I I I I I I 3 R7n R OCT NOV DEC JAN FEE MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1990 1991

Figure 74.--Miscellaneous water levels in well group CWF-4, 1991 water year.

57 1992 WATER YEAR

58 10 3,890.7

3,889.7

3,888.7 _ 111 Z 111 7 3,887.7 LU

3,886.7 LU 111 CD Rio Grande below Picacho Bridge 3,885.7 LU £ CO LU 3,884.7 > ffi m < 3,883.7 Q 3,882.7

3,881.7

3,880.7 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1991 1992 Figure 75.--Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Picacho Bridge, 1992 water year.

II 3,888.6

LU 1 3,887.6 LU LU LU LL LL Z 2 3,886.6 Z

LU O 3 3,885.8 jjj LL "'0 LU 3,884.8 I § 4 CO LU 3,883.6 CO Q 5 LC-1C LU 6 "V 3,882.8 Q m LC-1BN 3,881.6 g LU mLU 8 3,880.6 LC- 1 A

& 9 3,879.6 Q 10 3,878.6 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1991 1992

Figure 76. --Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group LC-1, 1992 water year. 59 3,888 tn 3,866 LU 3,884 £ LL Z LU 6 3,882 O _T LU LC-2B- O - 3,860 LU

W 10 3,878 LU W LU 12 3,876 O m

_l 14 LC-2A 3,874 LU LU m Q X 16 3,872 H h- Q. LU <0 Q 18 3,870

II 3,868 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1991 1992 Figure 77.--Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group LC-2, 1992 water year. 3,879.7 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

- LU tn u.LU 12-to 3,877.7 LU LL Z - Z

LU 14 3,875.7 _J O LU LL LU cc LC-3Ci 3,873.7 ~! w °~ " ~ " ?-r \ ,--<3~~' Q'~ LU W Q _J^O---_ __--Q''' < 18 _ LC-3B ~Cf ~~~~o __^,.^._,'--G '" 3,871.7 ^ 1 \r~*~ ^A/v O m g LC^"3A^ ~^~~~^~^-T-^ >--VY~^^^Tvr^v /^-V^^ rnr^Y^ - 2 20 3,889.7 uj LU Q m - 13 -p h- |- 22 - 3,867.7 >- Q. J LU _ ^ Q OA. ii i i i i i i i i 3.865 7 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1991 1992

Figure 78.--Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group LC-3, 1992 water year.

60 12 3,856.7

11 3,855.7

10 3,854.7 LU

9 3,853.7 h- LLJ Rio Grande below Mesilla Dam LU 8 3,852.7 LU LL LU Z 3,851.7 III LU W CD 3,850.7 LU w 3,849.7 cr 5 CD LU < 3,848.7 LU 1 Q

3,847.7 t

3,846.7 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1991 1992

Figure 79.--Mean daily river stage of the Rio Grande below Mesilla Dam, 1992 water year.

0 n 0 CQ 0 1 1 [ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' i- 2 3,857.2 1- LU ~ LU LU LU LL 4 - 3,855.2 LL Z Z 6 - 3,853.2 LU ~_ M-1B, \ _J O 8 3,851.2 LU LU IT 10 :^^-A ^/V^^V^n/^ 3,849.2 _J D - \l \l ^^7 \//\/v " V If y^ ^, W 12 V i / v' _ 3,847.2 LU M-1A 7 Q - W Z 14 3,845.2 LU _l 16 3,843.2 O > CQ 18 _ 3,841.2 3 LU LU Q CQ 20 3,839.2 - - h- I 1- 22 3,837.2 0. . b LU - 3,835.2 < Q 24 ' oc i i i i i i i i 3.833.2 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1991 1992

Figure 80.--Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group M-1, 1992 water year. 61 3,859.2

UJ 3,857.2 |_ UJ u_ UJ z 3,855.2 U_ UJ" z 3,853.2 O _l UJ 3,851.2 > UJ _l CO 3,849.2 <; Q UJ 3,847.2 1 M-2A UJ 3,845.2 O CD

UJ 16 3,843.2 m CO Q X 13 3,841.2 3 Q. g 20 3,839.2 -J <

22 3,837.2 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1991 1992 Figure 81.--Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group M-2, 1992 water year.

3,853.5

841.5 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT

Figure 82.--Mean daily water levels and miscellaneous water levels in well group M-4, 1992 water year.

62 DEPTH BELOW LAND SURFACE, IN FEET RIVER STAGE, IN FEET

(Q a ooooooooc3 C (a C ' 1 ' J*"1 ' 1~",'-"1" "~ I ' I ' I ' :..! ' 1 c X '"" i'' CD 0 (D 0 - ~ ' : : ' H 00 00

-* Z z i 0. (U (U a. <" c. (D Z - r' ^ \.-^ ; CT 00 O) 3 a 1 u T) _£f ~~ D ~~=r"^~--x^' 5 = a! (D _ CD (Q s "^*~-^=- (D (Q io -< '^ ^- .' "" """; 5 SE 0 a. . _- ~t= ^r;:-*

^ \ '

CO C ^J^ % CO o "^' ^--"^-'-''^ ~^ !'---=- s CO Ocr mco Q} m ^'r"^--JJ - i- ~ *: TJ 3 U .1,1,1.1, -PC^Vl. . 1 , I'-''. , 1 CD Gouuuuuuuu U G 00 , u ^ * 0 -.1 *^ 1 oo to o -* lu u ^ en O s ! en o> en CD C )G)G)G)G)G)G)G)G) J> C co ' CD

3,763.5 LU LU 3,753.5

: fMi " "' , .'." 3,743.5 LU > ipNij.. mjfa 3,733.5 LU \r i'li; ' '. ! jv 3,723.5 LU CO ti ^i;ir;LumiVK LU 3,713.5 ( VH. V i 'J - Om 3,703.5 < i in/ill LU Q 3,693.5 U

3,683.5

3,673.5

OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1991 1992

Figure 85.--Mean daily water levels in well group CWF-2, 1992 water year.

3,773.8 0 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 CWF-3As 1 3,763.8 LU. 10 ~ o o ° oo 8 n OQ o o ® ~ LU LU Pan . LU LL LL z 20 3,753.8 CWF-3B' A LU 30 3,743.8 0 A A LU > LL 40 X X 3,733.8 LU DC CWF-3Cy A X - CO 50 3,723.8 A LU Q CO A < 60 A 3,713.8 LU ^ CWF-3D\ O 3,703.6 5 70 x \ - m O < 3,693.8 LU LU 80 - X A \\ x Q m X 3,683.8 I 90 A X ~ Q. Ill 4 QQ _ 3,673.8 < Q

i 4 r\ 1 } 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3.663.8 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1991 1992

Figure 86.--Miscellaneous water levels in well group CWF-3, 1992 water year.

64 u J, / /U.O

- o CW ^A ^ o ' o ' ° ' 8 ' a g ' o ' o ' @ J UJ 10 3,760.6 111 H. 111 ° CWF-4B'° / ° ° X ? 20 3,750.6 A X 111 0 30 - A - 3,740.6 HI

HI CWF-4Cv 3,730.6 CO V HI Q 50 3,720.6 z ~ A A A ~ CO X X HI -1 60 _ X _ 3,710.6 o X CWF-4D^ X CO < 1 70 - ^ A x - 3,700.6 HI "A HI CO Q £ 80 _ 3,690.6 13 ! -, A Q. UJ 90 3,680.6 Q _

inn II I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 t R7n R OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT 1991 1992

Figure 87.--Miscellaneous water levels in well group CWF-4, 1992 water year.

65 SELECTED REFERENCES Frenzel, P.F., and Kaehler, C.A., 1992, Geohydrology and simulation of ground-water flow in the Mesilla Basin, Dona Ana County, New Mexico, and El Paso County, Texas, with a section on Water quality and geochemistry, by S.K. Anderholm: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1407-C, 105 p., 5 pis.

Hawley, J.W., 1984, Hydrologic cross sections of the Mesilla Bolson area, Dona Ana County, New Mexico, and El Paso County, Texas: Socorro, New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Open-File Report 190,8 p.

Hendricks, E.L., 1964, Compilation of records of surface waters of the United States, October 1950 to September 1960: U. S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1732,574 p.

King, WE., Hawley, J.W., Taylor, A.M., and Wilson, R.P., 1971, Geology and ground-water resources of central and western Dona Ana County, New Mexico: Socorro, New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Hydrologic Report 1,64 p.

Myers, R.G., and Orr, B.R., 1984, Geohydrology of the aquifer in the Santa Fe Group, northern West Mesa of the Mesilla Basin near Las Cruces, New Mexico: U.S. Geological Survey Water- Resources Investigations Report 84-4190,37 p.

Nickerson, E.L., 1986, Selected geohydrologic data for the Mesilla Basin, Dona Ana County, New Mexico, and El Paso County, Texas: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 86-75,59 p.

___1989, Aquifer tests in the flood-plain alluvium and Santa Fe Group at the Rio Grande near Canutillo, El Paso County, Texas: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 89-4011,30 p.

Nickerson, E.L., and Myers, R.G., 1993, Geohydrology of the Mesilla ground-water basin, Dona Ana County, New Mexico, and El Paso County, Texas: U.S. Geological Survey Water- Resources Investigations Report 92-4156,89 p.

Wilson, C.A., and White, R.R., 1984, Geohydrology of the central Mesilla Valley, Dona Ana County, New Mexico: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 82- 555,144 p.

Wilson, C.A., White, R.R., Orr, B.R., and Roybal, G.R., 1981, Water resources of the Rincon and Mesilla Valleys and adjacent areas, New Mexico: New Mexico State Engineer Technical Report 43,514 p. (16 pis. in separate packet).

66 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin [Main geologic unit: AVMB, flood-plain alluvium; SNTP, Santa Fe Group. Depth of well: R, reported. Altitude: datum is sea level. Water level: P, pumping; RP, recently pumped; NP, nearby pumping. Use of water: H, domestic; I, irrigation; M, municipal supply; S, stock; U, unused. Remarks: OWN, other well numbers or names; USER, Bureau of Reclamation; CLC, City of Las Cruces; NMSU, New Mexico State University; EBID, Elephant Butte Irrigation District; SI, screened interval; QW, chemical analysis available; WL, additional water-level measurements available; RW, replaced well casing new depth of well and construction date; indicates no data. Well locations shown in figure 4]

Water level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Well geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

1 21S.1W.14.313 AVMB 28.5 3,960 11.04 08-31-89 U OWNt USBR-41; 14.4 02-02-90 31:26.5-28.5 14.8 02-07-91 13.9 02-10-92

2 21S.1W.24.214 AVMB 28.6 3,950 11.36 08-31-89 U OWN: USBR-42; 15.2 02-02-90 SI: 26.6-28.6 15.1 02-07-91

3 22S.1W.19.332 SNTF 250 4,460 156.08 01-23-84 U 158.62 02-26-85 160.50 03-20-86 161.82 02-09-87 163.26 02-08-8 163.57 02-13-89 165.63 01-29-90 166.6 02-14-91 167.28 01-23-92

4 22S.1E.06.124 AVMB 28.2 3,935 8.81 08-31-89 U OWN: USBR-43; 10.7 02-05-90 SI: 26.2-28.2 10.9 02-07-91 10.5 02-10-92

5 22S.lE.09.241a AVMB 23.4 3,930.1 7.7 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-26; QW; WL; 9.3 02-01-85 RW: 28.4, 05-02-89 8.6 02-01-86 7.2 02-01-87 10.8 02-06-90 11.4 02-07-91 11.4 02-10-92

6 22S.1E.09.333 AVMB 3,928.1 6.9 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-20; QW; 7.7 02-01-85 WL 6.9 02-01-86 7.0 02-01-87 7.7 02-01-88 8.0 02-02-89 8.2 02-06-90 8.1 02-07-91 7.5 02-10-92

67 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin-Continued

Water level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Well geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

7 22S.1E.16.433 AVMB -- 3,923.4 9.4 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-19; QW; 9.2 02-01-85 WL 8.5 02-01-86 8.2 02-01-87 9.3 02-01-88 9.2 02-02-89 8.9 02-06-90 9.2 02-07-91 9.2 02-10-92

8 22S.1E.33.341 AVMB 3,906.4 7.9 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-15; QW; 8.0 02-01-85 WL 6.7 02-01-86 6.5 02-01-87 8.7 02-01-88 8.1 02-21-89 8.0 02-06-90 8.3 02-01-91 8.1 02-13-92

9 22S.1E.35.334 AVMB 3,909.9 13.9 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-18; QW; 14.0 02-01-85 WL; RW: 30.0, 05-02-89 13.3 02-01-86 12.9 02-01-87 13.1 02-01-88 13.0 02-02-89 13.6 02-06-90 14.1 02-01-91 14.0 02-10-92

10 22S.lE.35.334b AVMB 3,909.6 15.0 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-17; QW; 15.9 02-01-85 WL 15.4 02-01-86 13.9 02-01-87 15.4 02-01-88 15.0 02-02-89 15.9 02-06-90 16.4 02-01-91 16.2 02-10-92

11 22S.2E.31.444 SNTP 596 4,068 229.48 01-15-92 M OWN: CLC-23; SI: 456-596; WL

12 23S.1W.25.444 SNTP 380 4,197 329.70 02-22-84 U SI: 330-380; WL 327.11 02-01-85 327.62 02-10-87 327.69 02-02-88 327.82 02-13-89 327.40 01-30-90 327.75 02-15-91 327.9 03-25-92

68 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin-Continued

Water level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Well geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

13 23S.2W.01.422 SNTF -- 4,460 200.58 02-23-83 U 212.38 01-23-84 215.37 02-27-85 210.75 02-13-89 211.37 01-29-90 204.9 01-14-91 203.6 01-23-92

14 23S.2W.12.122 SNTF 4,463 175.1 01-23-84 U 217.34 02-27-85 219.83 03-20-86 215.2 02-09-87 214.9 02-08-88 219.72 02-13-89 206.57 02-14-91 205.17 01-23-92

15 23S.2W.12.341 SNTF 4,429 213.10 01-23-84 I OWN: 23S. 02W. 13 .311; 199.5 02-27-85 QW; WL 202.08 03-20-86 . 201.35 02-09-87 197.9 02-08-88 192.93 02-13-89 188.9 01-29-90 188.47 02-14-91 187.63 01-23-92

16 23S.2W.13.134 SNTF 4,431 182.85 01-23-84 185.62 02-27-85 188.04 03-20-86 183.43 02-09-87 180.97 02-08-88 178.9 02-13-89 175.37 01-29-90 174.97 02-14-91 179.92 01-23-92

17 23S.1E.01.411 SNTF 605 3,905 51.58 07-16-91 M OWN: CLC-33; 47.72 01-15-92 SI: 400-600

18 23S.1E.01.413 AVMB 28.5 3,900 19.48 08-31-89 U OWN: USBR-44; 20.8 02-02-90 SI: 26.5-28.5 21.4 02-01-91 21.6 02-06-92

19 23S.1E.09.433 AVMB 3,894.7 8.3 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-16; QW; 9.2 02-01-85 WL 8.5 02-01-88 7.9 02-02-89 8.7 02-06-90 9.0 02-01-91 9.5 02-13-92

69 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin-Continued

Water level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Well geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

20 23S.lE.11.214a SNTP 617 3,903 11.63 07-16-91 M OWN: CLC-31; 11.77 01-15-92 SI: 465-617

21 23S.lE.13.411b SNTP 629 3,890 P 01-15-92 M OWN: CLC-29; SI: 429-629; WL

22 23S.1E.14.241 AVMB 28.3 3,890 15.51 08-30-89 U OWN: USBR-45; 16.3 02-02-90 SI: 26.3-28.3 17.3 02-01-91 17.6 02-13-92

23 23S.1E.16.424 AVMB 3,865.7 13.4 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-12; QW; 14.4 02-01-85 WL 13.4 02-01-86 13.6 02-01-87 13.9 02-01-88 13.9 02-01-89 13.4 02-06-89 13.3 02-02-90 13.8 02-01-91 13.7 02-13-92

24 23S.lE.22.232a SNTF 305 3,888.6 7.91 01-16-85 U OWN: LC-1A; SI: 8.09 02-06-91 295-300; QW; WL 7.55 01-21-92

25 23S.lE.22.232b SNTF 105 3,888.6 5.88 01-16-85 U OWN: LC-1B; SI: 6.31 02-06-91 95-100; QW; WL 5.8 01-21-92

26 23S.lE.22.232c AVMB 41 3,888.6 6.34 01-17-85 U OWN: LC-1C; SI: 6.18 02-06-91 31-36; QW; WL 5.68 01-21-92

27 23S. IE. 22.241a SNTF 310 3,888.0 16.23 01-17-85 U OWN: LC-2A; SI: 15.68 02-06-91 300-305; QW; WL 15.48 01-21-92

28 23S.lE.22.241b SNTF 110 3,888.0 9.92 01-17-85 U OWN: LC-2B; SI: 9.35 02-06-91 100-105; QW; WL 8.94 01-21-92

29 23S.lE.22.241c AVMB 40 3,888.0 6.44 01-17-85 U OWN: LC-2C; SI: 6.68 02-06-91 30-35; QW; WL 6.09 01-21-92

70 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin Continued

Water level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Well geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

30 23S.lE.23.244a SNTF 332 3,889.7 22.26 03-06-85 U OWN: LC-3A; SI: 19.71 02-06-91 322-327; QW; WL 19.49 01-21-92

31 23S.lE.23.244b SNTF 120 3,889.7 21.32 03-06-85 a OWN: LC-38; SI: 18.13 02-06-91 110-115; QW; WL 17.72 01-21-92

32 23S.lE.23.244c AVMB 50 3,889.7 21.20 03-06-85 a OWN: LC-3C; SI: 17.99 02-06-91 40-45; QW; WL 17.58 01-21-92

33 23S.1E.27.334 AVMB 3,882.3 6.3 02-01-84 a OWN: USBR-11; QW; 6.2 02-01-85 WL 5.4 02-01-86 5.4 02-01-87 6.3 02-01-88 6.3 02-06-89 6.0 02-02-90 6.0 02-01-91 5.8 02-13-92

34 23S.2E.05.342 SNTF 751 4,063 236.79 07-16-91 M OWN: CLC-28; 222.88 01-15-92 SI: 420-751; WL

35 23S.2E.07.122 SNTF 360 3,944 96.51 07-16-91 a OWN: CLC-ii; 88.35 01-15-92 SI: 213-360; WL

36 23S.2E.07.411 SNTF 381 3,935 73.84 01-15-92 M OWN: CLC-10; SI: 281-381; WL

37 23S.2E.08.443 SNTF 730 4,047 223.45 01-15-92 M OWN: CLC-27; SI: 457-730; WL

38 23S.2E.16.314 SNTF 591 4,025 01-15-92 M OWN: CLC-24; SI: 381-591; WL

39 23S.2E.17.243 SNTF 700 4,013 187.72 07-16-91 M OWN: CLC-26; 176.39 01-15-92 SI: 410-510, 600-700; WL

40 23S.2E.18.441 SNTF 700 3,890 51.79 01-15-92 M OWN: CLC-32; SI: 456-552, 592-696

41 23S.2E.20.322 SNTF 685 3,880 P 01-15-92 M OWN: CLC-35; SI: 320-490, 510-575, 615-685

71 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin Continued

Water level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Hell geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

42 23S.2E.21.444 SNTF 507 4,057 208.8 02-02-90 0 OWN: NMSO-4; SI: 350-507

43 23S. 2E. 28. 123 SNTF 665 3,966 120.1 02-02-90 0 OWN: NMSO-3; Si: 590-665

44 23S.2E.28.314 SNTF 626 3,954 109.82 01-03-89 I OWN: NMSO-8; 100.44 04-19-91 SI: 330-626; WL 100.18 01-17-92

45 23S.2E.28.333 SNTF 525 3,932 78.72 02-14-90 H OWN: NMSO-9; 79.89 04-19-91 SI: 310-525 78.72 01-17-92

46 23S. 2E, 29. 113 AVMB 29 3,880 16.82 08-30-89 U OWN: USBR-47; 18.4 02-06-90 SI: 27-29 18.8 02-01-91 19.6 02-13-92

47 23S.2E.29.141 SNTF 712 3,882 32.18 01-03-89 H OWN: NMSU-14; SI: 323- 44.97 01-17-92 463, 547-667; WL

48 23S.2E.29.243a SNTF 485 3,903 61.64 01-03-89 U OWN: NMSU-2; SI: 362- 69.29 04-19-91 485; WL 63.40 01-17-92

49 23S.2E.29.331 SNTF 470 3,875 P 01-15-92 M OWN: CLC-30; SI: 249- 323, 338-458; WL

50 23S.2E.29.441 SNTF 766 3,912 73.76 02-14-90 H OWN: NMSU-10; 68.09 01-17-92 SI: 316-766

51 24S.1W.22.121 SNTF 4,230 353.25 01-24-83 S OWN: 24S.01W.22.123; 353.85 02-28-85 QW; WL 353.33 03-20-86 356.20 02-09-88 356.7 02-15-89 358.6 01-30-90

52 24S.2W.36.111 SNTF 4,319 332.12 03-06-85 S 437. 4P 03-20-86 P 02-27-89 334.15 02-06-90

53 24S.1E.01.223 AVMB 35 3,880 13.92 08-30-89 0 OWN: USBR-46; 15.5 02-06-90 SI: 33-35 16.3 02-07-91 16.6 02-13-92

72 Table 1.-Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin-Continued

Water level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Well geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

54 24S.1E.11.112 AVMB 28.2 3,870 4.77 08-30-89 U OWN: USBR-48; 6.1 02-02-90 SI: 26.2-28.2 6.3 02-01-91 6.1 02-13-92

55 24S.lE.13.221a SNTF 370 3,863 9.52 02-01-85 U OWN: EBID-5; SI: 8.94 02-06-86 145-370; QW; WL 8.44 02-09-87 8.91 02-02-88 8.77 02-13-89 9.56 02-08-90 9.57 02-18-91 8.94 01-16-92

56 24S.2E.07.231 SNTF 460 3,870 15.55 02-01-85 U OWN: EBID-2; SI: 14.51 02-10-86 180-460; WL 13.52 02-09-87

57 24S.2E.07.234 SNTF 310 3,871 17.88 02-01-85 U SI: 305-310; QW; 16.83 02-10-86 WL 15.86 02-09-87

58 24S.2E. 07.2343 SNTF 125 3,871 17.26 02-01-85 U SI: 120-125; QW; 15.88 02-10-86 WL 14.78 02-09-87

59 24S.2E.07.234b AVMB 80 3,871 17.16 02-01-85 U SI: 75-80; QW; WL 15.70 02-10-86 14.49 02-09-87

60 24S.2E. 08.434a AVMB 21 3,862.9 12.4 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-13; WL; 11.5 02-01-85 RW: 30.2, 04-21-89 9.7 02-01-86 9.0 02-01-90 10.1 02-08-91 9.3 02-20-92

61 24S.2E.09.433 AVMB 3,861.9 13.0 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-14; QW; 12.3 02-01-85 WL 10.8 02-01-86 10.5 02-01-87 9.8 02-01-88 9.6 02-21-89 9.4 02-01-90 10.3 02-08-91 10.1 02-20-92

62 24S.2E.16.124a SNTF 307 3,861.5 16.68 01-26-84 U OWN: M-4A; SI: 14.93 01-15-85 297-302; QW; WL 14.01 02-09-91 12.81 01-22-92

73 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin Continued

Water level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Well geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

63 24S.2E.16.124b SNTF 120 3,861.5 16.09 01-26-84 U OWN: M-4B; SI: 14.40 01-15-85 110-115; QW; WL 12.98 02-09-91 11.98 01-22-92

64 24S.2E.16.124c AVMB 40 3,861.5 13.85 01-30-84 U OWN: M-4C; SI: 13.17 01-15-85 30-35; QW; WL 11.54 02-09-91 10.95 01-22-92

65 24S.2E.17.322 SNTF 464 3,860 14.97 02-01-85 U OWN: EBID-3; SI: 13.23 02-10-86 180-464; QW; WL 13.68 02-09-87 12.95 02-02-88 12.96 02-13-89 13.95 02-08-90 13.94 02-18-91 12.89 01-16-92

66 24S.2E. 17.414a SNTF 312 3,858 11.14 02-01-85 U SI: 292-297; QW; 10.34 02-10-86 WL 11.19 02-09-87 9.91 02-02-88 10.09 02-13-89 11.07 02-08-90 10.98 02-18-91 9.86 01-16-92

67 24S.2E.17.414b SNTF 618 3,858 16.28 02-01-85 U SI: 612-617; QW; 16.50 02-10-86 WL 15.85 02-09-87 15.44 02-02-88 14.98 02-13-89 16.46 02-08-90 16.54 02-18-91 15.45 01-16-92

68 24S.2E. 17.423a SNTF 686 3,858 12.26 02-01-84 U OWN: EBID-1; SI: 10.96 02-01-85 310-680; QW; WL 10.31 02-10-86 11.09 02-09-87 9.43 02-02-88 9.84 02-13-89 11.14 02-08-90 11.00 02-18-91 9.53 01-16-92

74 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin Continued

Water level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Hell geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

69 24S.2E.17.423b SNTF 610 3,859.8 15.72 02-01-85 U OWN: M-3B; SI: 15.87 02-10-86 591-596; QW; Wl 15.30 02-09-87 14.85 02-02-88 14.37 02-13-89 15.60 02-08-90 15.73 02-18-91 14.77 01-16-92

70 24S.2E.17.423c SNTF 310 3,859.8 11.04 02-01-85 u OWN: M-3C; si: 10.27 02-10-86 302-307; QW; WL 11.10 02-09-87 9.72 02-02-88 9.98 02-13-89 10.97 02-08-90 10.85 02-18-91 9.66 01-16-92

71 24S.2E.17.423d SNTF 121 3,859.8 10.28 02-01-85 u OWN: M-3D; SI: 9.24 02-10-86 113-118; QW; WL 9.42 02-09-87 9.33 02-02-88 9.30 02-13-89 9.74 02-08-90 10.15 02-18-91 9.20 01-16-92

72 24S.2E.17.423e AVMB 35 3,859.8 9.95 02-01-85 u OWN: M-3E; si: 8.42 02-10-86 30-35; QW; WL 8.66 02-09-87 9.20 02-02-88 9.06 02-13-89 9.38 02-08-90 9.89 02-18-91 9.06 01-16-92

73 24S.2E.19.214a SNTF .320 3,859.2 10.45 12-01-83 U OWN: M-1A; SI: 10.96 01-15-85 310-315; QW; WL 11.97 02-09-91 10.43 01-22-92

74 24S.2E.19.214b SNTF 125 3,859.2 9.95 12-01-83 U OWN: M-1B; SI: 9.91 01-15-85 115-120; QW; WL 11.09 02-09-91 9.88 01-22-92

75 24S.2E.19.214c AVMB 45 3,859.2 6.17 12-01-83 U OWN: M-1C; SI: 6.42 01-15-85 35-40; QW; WL 9.67 02-09-91 8.94 01-22-92

75 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin Continued

Water level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Well geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

76 24S.2E. 19.2238 SNTF 319 3,859.2 10.59 01-15-85 U OWN: M-2A; SI: 11.74 02-09-91 309-314; Q»; WL

77 24S.2E.19.223b SNTF 120 3,859.2 9.28 01-15-85 U OWN: M-2B; SI: 10.79 02-09-91 110-115; QW; WL 9.66 01-22-92

78 24S.2E.19.223c AVMB SO 3,859.2 6.61 01-15-85 U OWN: M-2C; SI: 9.87 02-09-91 40-45; QW; WL 9.16 01-22-92

79 24S.2E.21.123 SNTF 480 3,855 12.73 02-01-85 U OWN: EBID-4; SI: 9.82 02-08-86 170-480; QW; WL 10.66 02-13-89 10.86 02-18-91 9.75 01-16-92

80 24S.2E.22.242 AVMB 19 3,851.4 10.1 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-10; WL; 9.8 02-01-85 RW: 30.5, 04-24-89 9.0 02-01-86 8.3 02-01-87 7.9 02-01-88 7.8 02-09-89 8.0 02-01-90 8.5 02-08-91 8.5 02-10-92

8.1 24S.2E.23.342 AVMB 20.7 3,848.6 10.9 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-9; QW; WL; 11.3 02-01-85 RW: 30.6, 04-24-89 9.0 02-01-86 8.9 02-01-90 9.6 02-08-91 9.6 02-20-92

82 24S.2E.28.334 AVMB 3,850.5 11.8 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-8; 10.7 02-01-85 WL 10.4 02-01-86 9.9 02-01-87 10.7 02-01-88 9.2 02-03-89 10.7 02-01-90 11.5 02-07-91 12.1 02-25-92

83 25S.2W.05.133 SNTF ~ 4,432 120.11 03-06-85 S OWN: 25S.02W.05. 134; 119.52 03-20-86 WL 117.65 02-10-87 116.70 02-09-88 115.95 02-15-89 115.76 02-06-90 114.53 02-15-91 114.0 01-27-92

76 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin-Continued

Hater level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Hell geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

84 25S.2W.30.324 SNTF 4,288 219.98 02-16-84 H 218.85 02-27-85 216.15 03-21-86 215.74 02-11-87 215.44 02-10-88 216.87 02-27-89 214.76 02-13-90 214.82 02-15-91 213.2 02-03-92

85 25S.3W.02.214 SNTF 527R 4,499 404.18 01-24-84 S HL 392.62 02-27-85 387.75 03-02-87 387.90 02-09-88 386.28 02-15-89 385.30 02-06-90 384.80 02-15-91 384.3 01-27-92

86 25S.1E.06.331 SNTF 400R 4,210 368.30 09-22-83 U 368.24 02-20-85 367.60 03-21-86 368.43 02-10-87 ' 368.50 02-09-88 368.45 02-15-89 368.5 02-06-90 366.42 02-15-91 368.52 01-27-92

87 25S. IE. 06. 333 SNTF 680 4,209 366.52 06-20-86 U OHH: Afton test hole; 366.08 02-10-87 SI: 665-675; QH 371.20 02-09-88 369.15 02-15-89. 367.55 02-06-90 368.45 02-15-91 366.0 01-27-92

88 25S. IE. 16. Ill SNTF 1,650 4,190 352.82 01-24-84 U OWN: 25S.01E.16.114; 352.85 02-27-85 WL 352.48 02-04-87 352.00 02-09-88 352.64 02-17-89 352.35 02-06-90 352.80 02-07-91 352.1 03-25-92

89 25S.lE.19.424a SNTF 4,154 323.93 01-24-84

90 25S.lE.19.424b SNTF 4,154 307.01 02-28-85 S 309.78 03-21-86

77 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin Continued

Water level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Well geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

91 25S.2E.01.411 AVMB 12.27 3,835.3 8.3 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-25; QW; 9.3 02-01-85 WL 7.5 02-01-86 7.5 02-01-87 7.1 02-01-88 7.6 02-09-89 Silted

92 25S.2E.04.114 AVMB 3,847 12.7 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-7; QW; 11.5 02-01-85 WL 12.1 02-01-86 12.4 02-01-87 12.0 02-01-88 11.3 02-02-89 12.0 02-01-90 12.0 02-07-91 12.2 02-10-92

93 25S.2E.23.212 AVMB -- 3,828.6 9.1 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-6; WL 8.9 02-01-85 8.7 02-01-86 8.8 02-01-87 8.8 02-01-88 8.5 02-02-89 8.6 02-01-90 8.7 02-07-91 8.8 02-25-92

94 25S.2E.25.322 AVMB 21 3,821.3 9.3 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-5; QW; WL; 10.4 02-01-85 RW: 21.2, 04-21-89 9.2 02-01-86 9.7 02-01-87 9.6 02-01-88 9.6 02-02-89 9.8 02-01-90 9.9 02-07-91 10.4 02-25-92

95 25S.2E.28.222b SNTF 120 3,922 104.60 02-16-84 S WL 103.97 01-09-85 103.85 02-13-87 103.74 02-02-88 103.70 02-14-89 103.72 02-12-90 103.90 02-19-91 103.68 02-24-92

96 25S.2E.31.312a SNTF 4,171 356.73 03-21-86 U 355.16 02-13-87 355.13 02-04-88 354.85 02-14-89 354.76 02-12-90 355.09 02-19-91 354.98 03-25-92

78 Table 1.-Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin Continued

Water level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Well geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

97 25S.2E.31.312b SNTF 1,OOOR 4,171 349.77 02-19-85

98 25S.3E.20.421 AVMB 3,818.9 7.6 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-24; QW; 7.9 02-01-85 WL 6.6 02-01-86 6.8 02-01-87 7.2 02-01-88 7.1 02-09-89 7.2 02-01-90 6.9 02-01-91 6.8 02-19-92

99 25S.3E.28.343a AVMB 3,814.6 8.4 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-27; WL 9.2 02-01-85 7.8 02-01-86 8.3 02-01-87 8.5 02-01-88 8.4 02-06-89 8.4 02-02-90 8.6 02-01-91 8.4 02-19-92

100 25S.3E.31.143 AVMB 3,814.3 7.6 02-01-84 0 OWN: USBR-4; WL 7.4 02-01-85 7.3 02-01-86 7.6 02-01-87 7.6 02-01-88 7.7 02-02-89 7.5 02-01-90 7.8 02-01-91 7.6 02-19-92

101 26S.1W.04.412 SNTF 445 4,211 414. 19P 01-24-84 S OWN: 26S.01W.04.322 384.85 02-27-85

102 26S.1W.16.334 SNTF 1,OOOR 4,210 388.75 02-27-85 P 02-27-89 386.40 02-22-90 103 26S.lW.25.412b SNTF 4,194 375.42 03-26-86 375.32 02-12-87 375.38 02-03-88 375.62 02-15-89 375.26 02-13-90 375.58 02-20-91

104 26S.2W.15.434 SNTF 437R 4,250 409.17 02-27-85 S QW 409.90 03-24-86 408.41 02-11-87 409.10 02-10-88 408.85 02-27-89 409.05 02-13-90 409.24 02-15-91 409.0 02-03-92

79 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin-Continued

Water level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Hell geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

105 26S.3W.25.443 SNTF 800 4,333 489.58 03-07-85 S 488.00 03-21-86 P 02-27-89 P 02-13-90 P 02-03-92

106 26S.lE.18.222a SNTF 430 4,213 394.40 02-16-84 S QW; WL

107 26S.lE.18.222b SNTF 600R 4,213 393.1 02-28-85 H, S 393.5 03-21-86 393.16 02-10-87 393.18 02-04-88 393.3 02-15-89 393.5 02-22-90 393.4 02-07-91 393.4 01-27-92

108 26S.1E.35.332 SNTF 500R 4,158 358.39 03-05-85 U OWN: 26S. 01E. 35 .333; 358.40 03-26-86 WL 363.99 02-12-87 358.38 02-03-88 358.56 02-15-89 358.55 02-13-90 358.69 02-20-91 358.63 02-24-92

109 26S.2E.01.211 AVMB 3,812.6 8.5 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-3; WL 8.5 02-01-85 8.1 02-01-86 6.4 02-01-87 8.0 02-01-88 7.7 02-02-89 8.0 02-01-90 8.2 02-01-91 7.8 02-19-92

110 26S.2E.32.333 SNTF 4,128 332.38 02-20-84 U 333.18 02-15-85

111 26S.3E.03.344 AVMB 26 3,812 10.06 02-01-85 U SI: 16-26; QW; WL 9.71 02-06-86 9.47 02-09-87 9.69 02-02-88 9.93 02-08-90 9.88 02-18-91 9.17 01-16-92

80 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin Continued

Water level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Well geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

112 26S.3E. 03.344a AVMB 36 3,812 10.11 02-01-85 0 SI: 26-36; QW; WL 9.75 02-06-86 9.53 02-09-87 9.73 02-02-88 9.88 02-14-89 9.99 02-08-90 9.93 02-18-91 9.24 01-16-92

113 26S.3E.03.344b AVMB 48 3,812 10.07 02-01-85 0 SI: 45-48; QW; WL 9.73 02-06-86 9.48 02-09-87 9.71 02-02-88 10.06 02-08-90 9.98 02-18-91 8.94 01-16-92

114 26S.3E.03.344c AVMB 75 3,812 10.62 02-01-85 U SI: 72-75; QW; WL 10.51 02-06-86 9.98 02-02-88 10.10 02-08-90 10.06 02-18-91 9.48 01-16-92

115 26S.3E.03.344d SNTF 150 3,812 10.95 02-01-85 U SI: 147-150; QW; 10.57 02-06-86 WL 10.07 02-09-87 9.78 02-02-88 9.86 02-14-89 10.40 02-08-90 10.30 02-18-91

116 26S.3E.04.122 AVMB 3,810.5 9.9 02-01-84 0 OWN: (JSBR-21; QW; 10.1 02-01-85 WL 9.3 02-01-86 9.6 02-01-87 9.6 02-01-88 9.7 02-02-89 9.9 02-01-90 9.6 02-01-91 9.6 02-19-92

117 26S.3E.08.221 AVMB 3,809.0 9.3 02-01-84 0 OWN: (JSBR-23; WL 10.0 02-01-85 9.9 02-01-86 9.3 02-01-87 10.0 02-01-88 9.8 02-09-89 9.8 02-01-90 10.4 02-01-91 9.6 02-19-92

81 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin-Continued

Water level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Hell geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

118 26S.3E.09.221a AVMB 3,804.7 6.8 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-22; WL 7.2 02-01-85 6.9 02-01-86 6.7 02-01-87 6.9 02-01-88 7.0 02-02-89 7.1 02-01-90 7.0 02-01-91 6.9 02-19-92

119 26S.3E.15.112 AVMB 3,806.5 6.9 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-28; WL 7.8 02-01-85 7.2 02-01-86 7.8 02-01-87 7.8 02-01-88 7.8 02-06-89 7.7 02-01-90 7.6 02-01-91 7.6 02-19-92

120 26S.3E.22.211 AVMB -- 3,794.5 4.6 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-30; QW; 4.0 02-01-85 WL 4.4 02-01-86 4.6 02-01-87 4.4 02-01-88 4.6 02-21-89 4.8 02-01-90 4.6 02-01-91 4.6 02-25-92

121 26S.3E.27.211 AVMB 3,793.6 6.8 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-32; QW; 6.5 02-01-85 WL 6.3 02-01-86 6.6 02-01-87 6.7 02-01-88 6.4 02-02-89 7.1 02-01-90 6.6 02-01-91 6.1 02-25-92

122 26S.3E.27.212 AVMB 3,792.9 5.5 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-31; WL 5.8 02-01-85 5.3 02-01-86 5.4 02-01-87 4.6 02-01-88 5.3 02-21-89 5.8 02-01-90 5.4 02-01-91 5.1 02-25-92

82 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin Continued

Water level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Well geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

123 26S.3E.32.441 AVMB 3,790.0 9.0 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-39; QW; 8.6 02-01-85 WL 8.9 02-01-86 9.3 02-01-87 8.8 02-01-88 8.8 02-09-89 8.9 02-01-90 8.7 02-01-91 8.7 02-25-92

124 27S.1W.26.433 S.NTF 314R 4,095 284.48 02-26-85 S Well destroyed 284.46 02-03-88 06-18-90 284.53 02-15-89 284.62 02-16-90

125 27S.lW.26.433a SNTF 475 4,095 285.35 02-21-91 S SI: 375-475 285.26 02-24-92

126 27S.2W.02.413 SNTF 406 4,203 P 02-16-85 S 367.10 02-13-90 368.7 02-26-91 377.7 01-24-92

127 27S.2W.25.1H SNTF 600 4,167 361.44 02-21-84 I QW; WL 361.68 02-13-85 374.45 03-24-86 374.86 02-11-87 375.75 02-10-88 376.27 02-17-89 376.14 02-13-90 372.8 02-26-91 363.3 01-24-92

128 27S.1E.04.121 SNTF 560 4,189 382.89 06-13-86 U OWN: Phillips 66; 382.81 02-12-87 SI: 440-560 382.79 02-03-88 383.00 02-15-89 382.68 02-13-90 383.12 02-20-91 383.06 02-24-92

129 27S.lE.04.121a SNTF 4,189 __ WN: Lanark test hole; QW

130 27S.2E.13.331 SNTF 722 4,098 316.59 08-23-86 U OWN: La Union test 316.59 02-13-87 hole; SI: 707-717; QW 317.23 02-03-88 317.69 02-15-89 317.56 02-09-90 317.29 02-20-91 317.48 02-24-92

83 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin-Continued

Water level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Well geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

131 27S.2E.21.111 SNTF 4,092 304.20 02-15-85 U OWN: 27S.02E.21.113 303.72 03-26-86 303.91 02-12-87 303.76 02-03-88 303.82 02-14-89 303.83 02-13-90 304.12 02-20-91 303.87 02-24-92

132 27S.3E.09.444 AVMB 3,779.1 6.9 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-38; QW; WL 3.5 02-01-85 5.8 02-81-86 5.9 02-01-87 4.6 02-01-88 3.7 02-09-89 5.4 02-01-90 6.8 02-01-91 5.8 02-25-92

133 27S.3E.22.221 AVMB 28.1 3,775 5.96 08-31-89 U OWN: USBR-49; 8.4 02-01-90 SI: 26.1-28.1 8.8 02-06-91 8.6 02-13-92

134 27S.3E.28.314 AVMB 3,771.2 8.6 02-01-84 U OWN: OSBR-1; QW; WL 8.7 02-01-85 7.9 02-01-86 8.3 02-01-87 8.0 02-01-88 14.8 02-03-89 8.1 02-01-90 7.9 02-06-91 7.8 02-25-92

135 27S.3E. 32.124a AVMB 3,773.2 9.7 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-2; WL 9.2 02-01-85 8.6 02-01-86 8.5 02-01-87 8.5 02-01-88 8.3 02-01-90 8.5 02-06-91 8.6 02-25-92

136 27S.3E.35.113 AVMB 29 3,767 9.59 08-31-89 U OWN: USBR-50; 12.0 02-01-90 SI: 27-29 13.2 02-06-91 12.3 02-25-92

137 28S.lW.07.113a SNTF 4,111 308.86 02-22-84 0 WL 310.49 03-25-86 309.21 02-15-89 309.16 02-13-90 309.4 02-05-91

84 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin-Continued

Hater level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Hell geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

138 28S.lH.07.113b SNTF 600 4,111 309.34 02-22-84 309.74 02-12-85 310.95 03-25-86 309.57 02-12-87 309.48 02-03-88 309.90 02-17-89 309.55 02-13-90 309.8 02-05-91

139 28S.2H.31.llla SNTF 4,153 315.89 03-02-84 316.84 02-13-85 316.23 02-16-89 328.75RP 02-25-92

140 28S.2H.31.lllb SNTF 4,153 320.76NP 02-22-91 321.19 02-25-92

141 28S.3H.33.443 SNTF 4,142 226.10 03-02-84 280.76RP 02-13-85 289.08 03-25-86 268.99 02-12-88 267.31 02-16-89 266.99RP 02-25-92

142 28S.1E.34.414 SNTF 533 4,127 327.35 09-04-86 OWN: Noria test hole; 327.53 02-12-87 SI: 518-528; QH 327.63 02-04-88 327.68 02-16-89 327.78 02-13-90 327.79 02-27-91 327.85 02-25-92

143 28S.2E.23.222 SNTF 4,111 333.78 03-06-84 334.08 02-14-86 333.98 03-26-86 335.18 02-12-87 334.78 02-04-88 335.12 02-14-89 335.36 02-09-90 335.94 02-27-91

144 28S.2E.24.444 SNTF 4,079 313.50 01-22-85 U HL 314.46 12-02-86 P 01-18-89 317.18 12-27-89 314.04 01-03-91

85 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin-Continued

Hater level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Hell geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

145 28S.3E.17.214 SNTF 330 3,828 70.30 01-23-85 U WL 70.22 12-02-86 70.06 01-11-88 70.41 01-18-89 70.61 12-26-89 70.44 01-03-91 70.52 12-10-91

146 28S.3E.21.144 SNTF 300 3,803 54.64 01-23-85 U WL 54.48 12-02-86 54.16 01-11-88 55.06 01-18-89 54.83 12-26-89 54.06 01-03-91 55.01 12-10-91

147 28S.3E.27.434 SNTF 300 3,822 72.07 01-23-85 U WL 71.43 12-02-86 71.11 01-11-88 71.34 01-18-89 71.65 12-26-89 71.14 01-03-91 71.75 12-10-91

148 28S.3E.29.344 SNTF 550 4,065 325.56 01-22-85 U HL 326.58 12-02-86 P 01-18-89

149 28S.3E.32.143 SNTF 605 4,095 328.86 01-22-85 U HL

150 29S.2H.06.231 SNTF 715R 4,109 263.73 02-26-85 U HL 263.79 03-25-86 263.95 02-12-87 264.60 02-04-88 264.39 02-16-89 264.20 02-16-90 264.13 02-21-91 264.18 02-25-92

151 29S.2H.15.234 SNTF 4,037 196.37 02-22-84 S WL

152 29S.3H.13.143 SNTF 4,050 202.04 02-22-84 S 191.92 02-20-85 192.08 03-25-86

86 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin Continued

Water level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Well geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

153 29S.1E.06.111 SNTF 4,130 326.63 03-01-84 s 326.77 02-15-85 326.96 02-04-88 326.26 02-24-89 326.84 02-13-90 326.92 02-27-91 326.98 02-25-92

154 29S.1E.08.124 SNTF 565 4,121 324.52 02-29-84 S WL 323.96 02-15-85 333.72 03-25-86 324.12 02-16-89 324.09 02-13-90 323.99 02-22-91 324.16 02-25-92

155 29S.2E.06.122b SNTF 600 4,108 307.54 02-21-85 H, S 309.10 03-25-86 307.01 02-12-87 307.14 02-04-88 307.27 02-16-89 307.36 02-13-90 P 02-22-91 p 307.52 02-25-92

156 JL 49-03-916 AVMB 29.6 3,754.7 7.9 02-01-84 U OWN: OSBR-36; QW; 7.1 02-01-86 RW: 29.3, 04-20-89 7.4 02-01-87 7.2 02-01-88 7.3 02-06-89 7.9 02-01-90 7.7 02-06-91 7.8 02-25-92

157 JL 49-04-111 SNTF 1,060 3,775.8 25.45 02-26-85 U OWN: CR-6; SI: 740- 61.04 12-04-86 860, 980-1,060; WL 41.68 12-22-87 50.90 02-21-89 76.12 12-19-89 41.28 12-24-90 74.65 01-17-92

158 JL 49-04-121 AVMB 3,788.4 7.0 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-29; QW; 5.5 02-01-85 WL 6.5 02-01-86 6.3 02-01-87 6.1 02-01-88 6.2 02-06-89 6.8 02-01-90 7.2 02-01-91 7.9 02-25-92

87 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin-Continued

Hater level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Hell geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

159 JL 49-04-416 SNTF 1,013 3,768.5 21.42 02-26-85 U OWN: CR-3; SI: 27.71 12-04-86 528-1,013; WL 23.12 12-22-87 25.64 02-21-89 26.88 12-19-89 22.56 12-24-90 22.40 01-17-92

160 JL 49-04-418 SNTF 545 3,769.8 37.78 02-26-85 U OWN: CR-5; SI: 18.52 12-04-86 445-545; HL 37.13 12-22-87 38.82 02-21-89 25.38 12-19-89 28.57 12-24-90 26.07 01-17-92

161 JL 49-04-419 SNTF 1,050 3,772.5 33.62 02-26-85 u OWN: CR-2; si: 67.95 12-04-86 585-1,050; WL 56.73 12-22-87 52.96 02-21-89 88.64 12-19-89 56.10 12-24-90 76.29 01-17-92

162 JL 49-04-466 AVMB 59 3,770.6 7.86 12-05-84 U OWN: CHF-4A; SI: 8.22 02-08-91 52-57; QW; WL 7.85 01-23-92

163 JL 49-04-467 SNTF 159 3,770.6 10.20 12-05-84 U OWN: CWF-4B; SI: 10.16 02-08-91 152-157; QW; WL 10.12 01-23-92

164 JL 49-04-468 SNTF 299 3,770.6 53.40 12-05-84 U OWN: CWF-4C; SI: 54.02 02-08-91 292-297; QW; WL 52.00 01-23-92

165 JL 49-04-469 SNTF 800 3,770.6 41.11 12-05-84 U OWN: CWF-4D; SI: 59.17 02-08-91 792.5-797.5; QW; WL 64.27 01-23-92

166 JL 49-04-470 AVMB 58 3,773.8 9.48 01-16-85 U OWN: CWF-3A; SI: 10.88 02-08-91 51-56; QW; WL 10.35 01-23-92

167 JL 49-04-471 SNTF 158 3,773.8 12.48 01-16-85 U OWN: CWF-3B; SI: . 13.58 02-08-91 151-156; QW; WL 13.75 01-23-92

88 Table 1. Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin-Continued

water level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Hell geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

168 JL 49-04-472 SNTF 298 3,773.8 48.60 01-16-85 u OWN: CWF-3C; si: 49.02 02-08-91 291-296; QW; WL 52.85 01-23-92

169 JL 49-04-473 SNTF 799 3,773.8 37.05 01-16-85 U OWN: CWF-3D; SI: 53.62 02-08-91 792-797; QW; WL 80.66 01-23-92

170 JL 49-04-474 AVMB 47 3,773.5 8.74 02-04-85 U OWN: CWF-2A; SI: 9.17 02-08-91 40-45; QW; WL 8.66 01-23-92

171 JL 49-04-475 SNTF 158 3,773.5 13.48 02-04-85 U OWN: CWF-2B; SI: 14.15 02-08-91 151-156; QW; WL 14.70 01-23-92

172 JL 49-04-476 SNTF 300 3,773.5 44.44 02-04-85 U OWN: CWF-2C; SI: 45.62 02-08-91 293-298; QW; WL 50.97 01-23-92

173 JL 49-04-477 SNTF 799 3,773.5 51.31 02-04-85 U OWN: CWF-2D; SI: 51.50 02-08-91 792-797; QW; WL 78.58 01-23-92

174 JL 49-04-478 AVMB 52 3,776.7 12.05 02-15-85 U OWN: CWF-1A; SI: 11.79 02-08-91 45-50; QW; WL 11.34 01-23-92

175 JL 49-04-479 SNTF 156 3,776.7 19.42 02-15-85 U OWN: CWF-1B; SI: 19.42 02-08-91 ' 149-154; QW; WL 20.46 01-23-92

176 JL 49-04-480 SNTF 334 3,776.7 48.73 02-15-85 U OWN: CWF-1C; SI: 46.75 02-08-91 327-332; QW; WL 53.46 01-23-92

177 JL 49-04-481 SNTF 803 3,776.7 53.19 02-15-85 U OWN: CWF-1D; SI: 51.05 02-08-91 798-803; QW; WL , 75.21 01-23-92

178 JL 49-04-701 AVMB 3,755.5 6.8 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-37; QW; 6.9 02-01-85 WL 6.6 02-01-86 6.5 02-01-87 6.4 02-01-88 6.4 02-06-89 7.2 02-01-90 7.1 02-06-91 7.1 02-25-92

89 Table 1.-Records of selected wells in the Mesilla ground-water basin Concluded

Hater level

Depth Depth Altitude below Main of of land land Use Hell geologic well surface surface Date of number Location unit (feet) (feet) (feet) measured water Remarks

179 JL 49-12-101 AVMB 21.6 3,748.1 6.0 02-01-86 U OHM: USBR-35; HL; 5.7 02-01-87 RH: 30.7, 04-20-89 6.3 02-01-88 7.0 02-06-89 7.0 02-01-90 6.9 02-06-91 6.2 02-25-92

180 JL 49-12-117 AVMB 17.7 3,747.3 6.3 02-01-84 U OHM: USBR-33; QH; HL; 6.5 02-01-85 RH: 31.8, 05-03-89 6.0 02-01-86 5.7 02-01-87 5.8 02-01-88 6.6 02-02-89 7.6 02-01-90 6.1 02-06-91 5.7 02-25-92

181 JL 49-12-501 AVMB 3,735.5 6.6 02-01-84 U OWN: USBR-34; HL 6.7 02-01-85 6.8 02-01-86 6.5 02-01-87 6.9 02-01-88 7.1 02-02-89 7.6 02-01-90 6.8 02-06-91 5.9 02-25-92

90 Table 2. Low-flow discharge record for the Rio Grande below Picacho Bridge near Las Cruces, New Mexico, 1991 water year LOCATION-Lat 32°17'45", long 106°49'25", in NE1/4SW1/4NE1/4 sec. 22, T. 23 S., R. 1 E., Dofta Ana County, hydrologic unit 13030102, on left bank 1.0 mile downstream from Picacho Bridge on U.S. Highway 70,1.2 miles west of Las Cruces, and at river mile 1,295.6. DRAINAGE AREA-31,000 square miles approximately, including 2,940 square miles in closed basin in San Luis Valley, Colorado.

PERIOD OF RECORD-October 1990 to February 1991. Operated as a low-flow station only; streamflow computed for discharge less than 100 cubic feet per second during the nonirrigation season. GAGE Water-stage recorder. Datum of gage is 3,880.7 feet above sea level.

REMARKS-Records good from October 17 through November 2. Records poor from November 3 through February 21; channel excavation resulted in poor channel conditions at low flow. Row regulated by Caballo Reservoir (station 08362000) 62 miles upstream and Elephant Butte Reservoir (station 08360500) 88 miles upstream. Diversions and ground-water withdrawals for irrigation of about 840,000 acres upstream from station. MINIMUM FOR WATER YEAR 1991-Minimum discharge during period October 1990 to February 1991,22 cubic feet per second on February 19-21.

DISCHARGE, IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND, WATER YEAR OCTOBER 1990 TO SEPTEMBER 1991, MEAN VALUES

DAY OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAY SEPT 74 49 38 28 72 49 40 29 43 35 30 43 34 29 672 43 34 28

e68 43 35 29 e66 41 33 28 e65 42 34 28 9 e64 42 33 28 10 e63 41 41 27

11 e62 40 40 26 12 e61 40 37 32 13 e60 41 36 33 14 e59 42 38 29 15 e58 38 36 25

16 e57 42 36 26 17 98 e56 49 38 26 18 93 e55 42 39 26 19 94 e54 39 40 24 20 88 e53 41 38 23

21 81 e52 36 35 41 22 76 e52 e36 34 23 78 e51 e36 35 24 75 e51 e36 33 25 73 e50 e35 33

26 75 e50 e35 32 27 77 e49 e35 32 28 75 52 e34 30 29 77 46 e34 30 30 82 48 39 28 31 75 32 30

Total 1,238 1,087 Mean 39.9 35.1 Maximum 49 41 Minimum 32 28 Acre-feet 2,460 2,160

Estimated

91 Table 3. Low-flow discharge record for the Rio Grande below Picacho Bridge near Las Cruces, New Mexico, 1992 water year LOCATION-Lat 32°17'45", long 106°49'25"/ in NE1/4SW1/4NE1/4 sec. 22, T. 23 S., R. 1E., Dona Ana County, hydrologic unit 13030102, on left bank 1.0 mile downstream from Picacho Bridge on U.S. Highway 70,1.2 miles west of Las Cruces, and at river mile 1,295.6.

DRAINAGE AREA-31,000 square miles, approximately, including 2,940 square miles in closed basin in San Luis Valley, Colorado.

PERIOD OF RECORD-October 1990 to January 1992. Operated as a low-flow station only; streamflow computed for discharge less than 100 cubic feet per second during the nonirrigation season. Low-flow station discontinued on February 1,1992. GAGE Water-stage recorder. Datum of gage is 3,880.7 feet above sea level. REMARKS Records good from November 2 through January 10. Discharge less than 100 cubic feet per second from November 2 through December 11, December 13 through 18, and December 30 through January 10. Flow regulated by Caballo Reservoir (station 08362000) 62 miles upstream and Elephant Butte Reservoir (station 08360500) 88 miles upstream. Diversions and ground-water withdrawals for irrigation of about 840,000 acres upstream from station. MINIMUM FOR PERIOD OF RECORD-Minimum discharge, 22 cubic feet per second, February 19-21,1991. MINIMUM FOR WATER YEAR 1992-Minimum discharge during period November 1991 to January 1992,34 cubic feet per second on January 11.

SEPTZMBBR 1992, DAILY MEAN VAUJES

DAY OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG 5EFT 1 61 58 2 86 67 56 3 82 58 54 4 79 53 56 5 79 53 74

6 75 54 79 7 75 52 73 8 70 50 57 9 70 47 62 10 66 47 60

11 73 79 12 72 13 69 73 14 68 52 15 73 47

16 81 46 17 73 47 18 66 79 19 61 20 60

21 64 22 66 23 61 24 61 25 65

26 64 27 63 28 63 29 57 30 54 76 31 65

Total Mean Max Min Acre-feet

92 Table 4. Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 5-6,1988

EXPLANATION

REACH The seepage investigation was conducted along a 62.4-mile reach from the Rio Grande below Leasburg Dam near Radium Springs, New Mexico, to the Rio Grande at El Paso, Texas (08364000). River miles are referenced upstream from the Rio Grande at El Paso, Texas, which is designated as river mile 1,249.9 (Hendricks, 1964).

WEATHER Weather was favorable for the seepage investigation; there was no measurable pre­ cipitation 10 days prior to the investigation. Light precipitation occurred overnight during the investigation (0.11 inch at Las Cruces, New Mexico) with no significant accumulation. Precipita­ tion did not affect streamflow conditions.

STREAMFLOW The seepage investigation was conducted during a period of constant base flow. Discharge measurements indicate a net seepage loss of 26.1 cubic feet per second from river mile 1,312.3 to river mile 1,249.9. Indicated gains (+) and losses (-) throughout the reach are shown below. Tributary flow recorded as inflow is considered a contribution and not a gain; no outflow (diversions) occurred during the investigation. Evaporation from the water surface of the river in January is considered negligible.

WATER QUALITY-Chemical analyses of water samples collected from the Rio Grande (six sites) during the seepage investigation are listed in table 9. Water samples were analyzed for major ions, selected nutrients, and selected trace elements.

GROUND-WATER LEVELS-Ground-water levels were steady during the seepage investiga­ tion. Water levels in selected observation wells completed in the shallow flood-plain alluvium are listed in table 10.

REMARKS The seepage investigation is rated good based upon steady streamflow conditions and discharge measurement notes.

°C, degrees Celsius; pS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius; ft3/s, cubic feet per second; , no data or not applicable. Site number locations are shown in figure 8. Locations are in New Mexico unless otherwise indicated.

93 Table 4.~Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 5-6,1988-Continued

Discharge, in ft3/s

Water Specific Site temper­ conduct- Gain num- River ature ance Main or her mile Stream Location Time (°C) (|iS/cm) stream Inflow loss

January 5. 1988

1 1,312.3 Rio Grande Below Leasburg Dam, Radium Springs 0900 6 1,100 95.1 Lat 32°28'4r, long 106°55'10"

2 1,310.2 Rio Grande Near Leasburg 1025 7 1,100 95.5 -1-0.4 Lat32°27'21".long 106°54'08"

3 1,307.6 Selden Drain Near Leasburg 1125 7 1,450 ^0.3 Lat 32°25'38", long 106°52'50"

4 1,306.3 Rio Grande Near Hill 1200 8 1,250 98.9 -1-3.1 Lat 32°25'05", long 106°52'01"

5 1,302.7 Rio Grande At Shalem Bridge near Dona Ana 1305 8.5 1,300 105 -1-6.1 Lat 32°22'34>>. long 106°51'16"

6 1,301.2 Wasteway no. 5 Near Dona Ana 1350 11 1,850 ^0.1 Lat 32°22'14", long 106°50'14"

7 1,298.8 Rio Grande NearKcacho 0900 5.5 UOO 102 -3.1 Lat32°201 18".long 106°50'09"

8 1,295.6 Rio Grande Below Kcacho Bridge near Las Graces 1030 7 1,300 102 0 Lat 32°17'45". long 106°49'25"

9 1.295.4 Wastewater inflow City of Las Graces 1 130 16 1,100 -%6 Lat 32°17'35", long 106°49'26"

10 1,293.1 Rio Grande At NM-359 Bridge near Mesflla 1145 8 1,300 113 +1.4 Lat 32°15'49". long 106°49'29"

11 1,291.8 Picacho Drain Above Mesffla Dam 1300 9 1,500 3.5 Lat 32°14'34", long 106°48'56"

12 1,291.7 Rio Grande Below Picacho Drain 1620 9 1,250 115 -1.5 Lat 32°14'30", long 106°48'49"

January 6. 1988

13 1,289.5 Rio Grande Below Mesifla Dam 0730 4 1,250 100 -15 Lat32°13'17",long 106°47'15"

14 1,287.3 Rio Grande At NM-28 Bridge near San Pablo 0930 6 1,250 103 +3 Lat 32°12'24", long 106°45f32"

15 1,283.6 Santo Tomas River Near San Miguel 1035 Drain Lat 32°10' 16", long 106°43' 11"

94 Table 4. Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 5-6,1988-Continued

Discharge, in ft3/s

Water Specific Site temper- conduct- Gain num- River ature ance Main or her mile Stream Location Time (°C) QlS/cm) stream Inflow loss

January 6. 1988

16 1,282.7 Rio Grande NM-228 Bridge near San Miguel 0930 8 1,250 100 -3 Lat 32°09143", long 106°42'58"

17 1.277.8 Rio Grande At NM-227 Bridge near Vado 0815 8.5 1,250 91.2 -8.8 Lat 32°06'48", long 106°40'05"

18 1,276.6 Del Rio Drain Near Vado 0955 13 1,300 36.4 Lat 32°06'09". long 106°39'27"

19 1,273.8 Rio Grande At NM-226 Bridge near Berino 1105 12 1,300 131 +3.4 Lat32°03'56",long 106°39'45"

20 1,271.6 La Mesa Drain Near Chamberino 1245 14 1,900 12.6 Lat32°02'15",long 106°39'23"

21 1,271.5 Rio Grande Below La Mesa Drain near Chamberino 1340 14 1.350 149 +5.4 Lat32c02'12",long 106°39'18"

22 1,268.5 Rio Grande At NM-225 Bridge near Anthony 1030 11 1,350 163 +14 Lat 31°59'58", long 106°38'07"

23 1,268.5 Pipe inflow At NM-225 Bridge near Anthony -- Lat31°59'58",long 106°38'07"

24 1,265.4 East Drain Near Vinton, Tex. 1135 12 3,050 11.2 Lat31°58'09".long 106°36'17"

25 1,264.7 Rio Grande At Vinton Bridge near Vinton, Tex. 1215 12 1.400 170 -4.2 Lat 31°57'33", long 106°36'16"

26 1,261.6 Rio Grande At TX-259 Bridge, Canutillo, Tex. 1315 12 1,500 171 +1 Lat31G54'54".long 106°36'06"

26A 1,260.8 Temporary well Near CanutiUo, Tex. inflow Lat31Q54'19'Mong 106°36'06"

27 1.259.3 Rio Grande At Borderland Bridge near Borderland, Tex. 1415 13.5 1,500 160 -18.6 106°35'55"

28 1,256.2 Rio Grande At TX-260 Bridge near Santa Teresa 1135 11.5 1,500 153 -7 Lat 31°50'46", long 106°36'18"

28A 1,253.4 Wastewater inflow Riverside Plant, City of Sunland Park Lat31°48'46",long 106°35'11"

29 1,252.8 Rio Grande Near Sunland Park 1255 11 1,450 139 -14 Lat 31°48'24". long 106°34'57"

95 Table 4.~Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 5-6,1988-Concluded

Discharge, in ft3/s

Water Specific Site temper- conduc- Gain num- River ature tance Main or her mile____Stream______Location______Time (°C)___QxS/cm) stream Inflow loss

January 6.1988

30 1,252.4 Wastewater inflow Sunland Plant, City of Sunland Park - - - ^0.14 Lat 31°48'05", long 106°34'44"

31 1,250.9 Rio Grande At Sunland Park Bridge, Sunland Park Lat 31°47'56", long 106°33'16"

32 1,250.3 Montoya Drain Near Sunland Park 1425 14 2,600 42.9 Lat 31°48'10", long 106°32'47"

32A 1,250.3 Temporary well At Sunland Park 1530 inflow Lat 31°48'08". Iongl06°32'45"

33 1,250.1 Keystone Reservoir Near El Paso, Tex. 1550 outlet Lat 31°48' 18", long 106°32'39"

34 1,249.9 Rio Grande At Courchesne Bridge, El Paso, Tex. 1530 13 1,900 194 +11.3 ______Lat 31°48'09", long 106°32'26"______

I/Estimated discharge. 2/Reponed mean daily discharge. 3/Temporary well inflow from shallow wells completed hi the flood-plain alluvium within 500 feet of the Rio Grande. Wells were pumped for the purpose of dewatering at construction sites.

96 Table 5.~Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 10-11,1989

EXPLANATION

REACH~The seepage investigation was conducted along a 62.4-mile reach from the Rio Grande below Leasburg Dam near Radium Springs, New Mexico, to the Rio Grande at El Paso, Texas (08364000). River miles are referenced upstream from the Rio Grande at El Paso, Texas, which is designated as river mile 1,249.9 (Hendricks, 1964).

WEATHER~No measurable precipitation had occurred since January 4 (0.02 inch). Air tempera­ tures were lower than normal during the seepage investigation. Temperature extremes at Las Cruces, New Mexico, ranged from a low of minus 8 degrees Celsius on January 10 at 0700 hours to a high of 20 degrees Celsius on January 11 at 1500 hours.

STREAMFLOW-The seepage investigation was conducted during a period of constant base flow. Discharge measurements indicate a net seepage loss of 7.2 cubic feet per second from river mile 1,312.3 to river mile 1,249.9. Indicated gains (+) and losses (-) throughout the reach are shown below. Tributary flow recorded as inflow is considered a contribution and not a gain; no outflow (diversions) occurred during the investigation. Evaporation from the water surface of the river in January is considered negligible.

WATER QUALITY-Chemical analyses of water samples collected from the Rio Grande (six sites) during the seepage investigation are listed in table 9. Water samples were analyzed for major ions, selected nutrients, and selected trace elements.

GROUND-WATER LEVELS Ground-water levels were measured during the seepage investiga­ tion. Water levels in selected observation wells completed in the shallow flood-plain alluvium are listed in table 10.

REMARKS The seepage investigation is rated poor based upon unsteady streamflow. Tempera­ ture extremes during the investigation resulted in diurnal fluctuations in river stage. Shore ice was observed at many of the discharge measurement sites. Recorded river stage in the Rio Grande at NM-227 Bridge near Vado, New Mexico (site 17), indicates a change in gage height from minus 0.36 foot on January 10 at 1530 hours to minus 0.44 foot on January 11 at 1045 hours. Individual discharge measurements were rated good (within 5 percent) to fair (within 8 percent); accuracy of discharge measurements needs to be considered when evaluating indicated gains and losses.

°C, degrees Celsius; |iS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius; fr/s, cubic feet per second; , no data or not applicable. Site number locations are shown in figure 8. Locations are in New Mexico unless otherwise indicated.

97 Table 5. Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 10-11,1989-Continued

Discharge, in ft3/s

Water Specific Site temper- conduct- Gain num- River ature ance Main or ber mile Stream_ ___ Location Time (°C) ((iS/cm) stream Inflow loss

January 10. 1989

1 1,312.3 Rio Grande Below Leasburg Dam, Radium Springs 1105 4 1,500 33.1 - Lat 32°28'41", long 106°55'10"

2 1,310.2 Rio Grande Near Leasburg 1225 7 1,570 38.9 +5.8 Lat 32°27'21",long 106°54'08"

3 1.307.6 Selden Drain Near Leasburg 1320 5 1.270 %2 Lat 32°25'38", long 106°52'50"

4 1,306.3 Rio Grande Near Hill 1405 9 1,700 48.8 +9.7 Lat 32°25'05", long 106°52'01"

5 1,302.7 Rio Grande At Shalem Bridge near Dona Ana 1520 8.5 1,650 51.5 +2.7 Lat 32°22'34", long 106°5ri6"

6 1,301.2 Wasteway no. 5 Near Dona Ana 1545 9 1,780 %1 Lat 32°22' 14", long 106°50' 14"

7 1,298.8 Rio Grande Near Picacho 1040 2 1,710 54.5 +2.9 Lat32°20'18",long 106°50'09"

8 1,295.6 Rio Grande Below Picacho Bridge near Las Cruces 1200 5 1.670 60.6 +6.1 Lat 32°17'45", long 106°49'25"

9 1,295.4 Waste water inflow City of Las Cruces 1205 10 1,270 1/10.0 Lat 32°17'35", long 106°49'26"

10 1,293.1 Rio Grande At NM-359 Bridge near Mesilla 1330 8 1,620 55.1 -15.5 Lat 32°15'49", long 106°49'29"

11 1,291.8 Picacho Drain Above Mesilla Dam 1410 8 1,500 2.86 - Lat 32°14'34", long 106°48'56"

12 1,291.7 Rio Grande Below Picacho Drain 1500 8 1,580 33.4 -24.6 Lat 32°14'30", long 106°48'49"

13 1,289.5 Rio Grande Below Mesilla Dam 1150 5 1480 44.5 +11.1 Lat32°13'17",long 106°47'15"

14 1,287.3 Rio Grande At NM-28 Bridge near San Pablo 1250 4 1,620 43.3 -1.2 Lat 32°12>24", long 106°45'32"

15 1,283.6 Santo Tomas River Near San Miguel 1310 0 Drain Lat 32°10'16", long 106°43'11"

16 1,282.7 Rio Grande At NM-228 Bridge near San Miguel 1425 7 1,580 45.0 +1.7 Lat 32°09>43", long 106°42fS8"

17 1,277.8 Rio Grande At NM-227 Bridge near Vado 1530 7 1,520 50.4 +5.4 Lat32°06'48",long 106°40'05"

98 Table 5.~Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 10-11,1989-Continued

Discharge, in ft3/s

Water Specific Site temper- conduct- Gain num- River ature ance Main or her mile Stream Location Time (°C) (jiS/cm) stream Inflow loss

January 11. 1989

17 1,277.8 Rio Grande At NM-227 Bridge near Vado 1 045 3 1,540 42.4 __ Lat 32°06'48", long 106°40'05"

18 1,276.6 Del Rio Drain Near Vado . 1215 9 1,300 33.2 Lat 32°06'09", long 106°39'27"

19 1,273.8 Rio Grande At NM-226 Bridge near Berino 1310 10 1,460 70.1 -5.5 Lat32003'56",long 106°39'45"

20 1.271.6 La Mesa Drain Near Chamberino 1415 10 1,900 12.0 Lat 32°02'15". long 106°39'23"

21 1,271.5 Rio Grande Below La Mesa Drain near Chamberino 1 530 11 1,650 90.3 +8.2 Lat 32°02'12", long 106°39'18"

22 1,268.5 Rio Grande At NM-225 Bridge near Anthony 1 100 4 1.530 80.6 -9.7 Lat31°59'58",l<»g 106°38'07"

23 1,268.5 Pipe inflow At NM-225 Bridge near Anthony __ Lat31°59'58".long 106°38'07"

24 1,265.4 East Drain Near Vinton, Tex. 1150 6 3.100 8.59 Lat 31°58'09". long 106°36'17"

25 1.264.7 Rio Grande At Vinton Bridge near Vinton. Tex. 1330 8 1.680 101 + 11.8 LatSl^rsy.long 106°36'16"

26 1,261.6 Rio Grande At TX-259 Bridge, Canutfflo. Tex. 1440 8 1.670 105 +4 Lat irSA'W. long 106°36'06"

27 1,259.3 Rio Grande At Borderland Bridge near Borderland, Tex. 1 540 9 1,680 91.0 -14.0 Lat 31°53'09", long 106°35'55"

28 1,256.2 Rio Grande At TX-260 Bridge near Santa Teresa 1130 4 1.740 87.9 -3.1 Lat31°50'46",long 106°36'18"

29 1,252.8 Rio Grande Near Sunland Park 1315 7.5 1.750 82.3 -5.6 Lat 3V4VW, long 106°34'57"

30 1,251.0 Was tewater inflow Sunland Plant, City of Sunland Park 1 430 18 1,750 0.9 Lat 31°47'55", long 106°33'25"

31 1,250.9 Rio Grande At Sunland Park Bridge, Sunland Park 1415 9 1,680 87.5 +4.3 Lat31°47'56",long lOe^S'ie"

32 1,250.3 Montoya Drain Near Sunland Park 1620 11 2.260 36.2 Lat Sl^S'lO". long 106°2'47"

99 Table 5. Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 10-11,1989-Concluded

Discharge, in ft3/:

Water Specific Site temper- conduct- Gain num- River ' ature ance Main or her mile Stream______Location______Time (°C)___(p.S/cm) stream Inflow loss

January 11, 1989

33 1.250.1 Keystone Reservoir Near El Paso, Tex. 1625 - - 0.04 outlet Lat 31°48'18", long 106°32'39"

34 1,249.9 Rio Grande At Courchesne Bridge, El Paso, Tex. 1510 10 1,975 122 -1.7 ______Lat 31048'09". long 106°32'26"______

I/Estimated discharge. 2/Reported mean daily discharge.

100 Table 6. Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 9-10,1990

EXPLANATION

REACH-The seepage investigation was conducted along a 62.4-mile reach from the Rio Grande below Leasburg Dam near Radium Springs, New Mexico, to the Rio Grande at El Paso, Texas (08364000). River miles are referenced upstream from the Rio Grande at El Paso, Texas, which is designated as river mile 1,249.9 (Hendricks, 1964).

WEATHER Weather was favorable for the seepage investigation; no measurable precipitation had occurred since December 30,1989 (0.57 inch). Temperature extremes at Las Cruces, New Mexico, ranged from a low of minus 4 degrees Celsius on January 9 to a high of 20 degrees Cel­ sius on January 10.

STREAMFLOW The seepage investigation was conducted during a period of constant base flow. Discharge measurements indicate a net seepage loss of 32.5 cubic feet per second from river mile 1,312.3 to river mile 1,249.9. Indicated gains (+) and losses (-) throughout the reach are shown below. Tributary flow recorded as inflow is considered a contribution and not a gain; no outflow (diversions) occurred during the investigation. Evaporation from the water surface of the river in January is considered negligible.

WATER QUALITY-Chemical analyses of water samples collected from the Rio Grande (six sites) during the seepage investigation are listed in table 9. Water samples were analyzed for major ions, selected nutrients, and selected trace elements.

GROUND-WATER LEVELS Ground-water levels were measured during the seepage investiga­ tion. Water levels in selected observation wells completed in the shallow flood-plain alluvium are listed in table 10.

REMARKS-The seepage investigation is rated good based upon steady streamflow conditions. Recorded river stage in the Rio Grande at NM-227 Bridge near Vado, New Mexico (site 17), showed no change in gage height during the seepage investigation. Individual discharge mea­ surements were rated good (within 5 percent) to fair (within 8 percent); acccuracy of discharge measurements needs to be considered when evaluating indicated gains and losses.

°C, degrees Celsius; \iS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius; ftVs, cubic feet per second; , no data or not applicable. Site number locations are shown in figure 8. Locations are in New Mexico unless otherwise indicated.

101 Table 6. Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 9-10,1990-Continued

Discharge, in ft3/s

Water Specific Site temper- conduct- Gain num- River ature ance Main or her mile Stream Location Time (°C) OiS/cm) stream Inflow loss

January 9. 1990

1 1,312.3 Rio Grande Below Leasburg Dam, Radium Springs 1100 6.5 1,480 37.8 Lat 32°28'41", long 106°55'10"

2 1,310.2 Rio Grande Near Leasburg 1150 9.5 1,510 37.1 -0.7 Lat 32°27'21", long 106°54'08"

3 1,307.6 Selden Drain Near Leasburg 1220 - - 0 Lat 32°25'38", long 106°52'50"

4 1,306.3 Rio Grande Near Hill 1315 12 1,680 49.7 +12.6 Lat 32°25'05", long 106°52'01"

5 1,302.7 Rio Grande At Shalem Bridge near Dona Ana 1415 12 1,640 42.9 -6.8 Lat 32°22'34", long 106°51'16"

6 1,301.2 Wasteway no. 5 Near Dona Ana 1435 ~ 1.980 0.004 Lat32°22'14",long 106°50'14"

7 1,298.8 Rio Grande NearPicacho 1030 7 1,670 44.9 +2.0 Lat32°20'18".long 106°50'09"

8 1,295.6 Rio Grande Below Picacho Bridge near Las Graces 1145 8.5 1.640 35.5 -9.4 Lat 32°17'45". long 106°49'25"

9 1,295.4 Wastewater inflow City of Las Graces 1200 15.5 1,410 -%7 Lat 32°17'35", long 106°49'26"

10 1,293.1 Rio Grande At NM-359 Bridge near Mesilla 1250 10.5 1,630 48.7 +3.5 Lat 32°15'49", long 106°49'29"

11 1,291.8 Picacho Drain Above Mesilla Dam 1410 7.5 1.520 2.31 Lat 32°14'34", long 106°48'56"

12 1.291.7 Rio Grande Below Picacho Drain 1450 11.5 1,610 45.0 -6.0 Lat 32°14'30", long 106°48'49"

13 1,289.5 Rio Grande Below Mesilla Dam 1050 7.5 1,590 29.0 -16.0 Lat32°13'17",long 106°47'15"

14 1,287.3 Rio Grande At NM-28 Bridge near San Pablo 1225 9.5 1,560 29.9 +0.9 Lat 32°12'24", long 106°45'32"

15 1,283.6 Santo Tomas River Near San Miguel 1255 - - 0 Drain Lat32°10'16",long 106°43'H"

16 1,282.7 Rio Grande At NM-228 Bridge near San Miguel 1440 12.5 1,570 29.3 -0.6 Lat32°09'43", long 106°42'58"

17 1,277.8 Rio Grande At NM-227 Bridge near Vado 1550 13 1,580 26.2 -3.1 Lat 32°06'48", long 106°40'05"

102 Table 6.~Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 9-10,1990-Continued

Discharge, in ft3/s

Water Specific Site temper- conduct- Gain num- River ature ance Main or her mile Stream Location Time (°C) (nS/cm) stream Inflow loss

January 10. 1990

17 1,277.8 Rio Grande At NM-227 Bridge near Vado 0950 5 1,580 26.2 - Lat32°06'48",long 106°40'05"

18 1,276.6 Del Rio Drain Near Vado 1030 9.5 1.320 27.4 Lat32°06'09",long 106°39'27"

19 1,273.8 Rio Grande At NM-226 Bridge near Berino 1 150 10 1,450 54.9 +1.3 Lat32°03 >56",long 106°39'45"

20 1,271.6 La Mesa Drain Near Chamberino 1245 10.5 1,890 9.77 Lat32°02'15",long 106°39'23"

21 1,271.5 Rio Grande Below La Mesa Drain near Chamberino 1340 10.5 1,520 67.7 +3.0 Lat32°021 12",long 106°39'18"

22 1.268.5 Rio Grande At NM-225 Bridge near Anthony 1005 5.5 1,550 65.5 -2.2 Lat31°59'58",long 106°38'07"

23 1,268.5 Pipe inflow At NM-225 Bridge near Anthony 0920 13 1,330 0.05 LatSlWSS-.long 106°38'07"

24 1,265.4 East Drain Near Vinton, Tex. 1050 6.5 3,270 5.56 LatS^SSW.long 106°36'17"

25 1,264.7 Rio Grande At Vinton Bridge near Vinton, Tex. 1 130 7.5 1,700 74.1 +3.0 Lat31°57'33",long 106°36'16"

26 1,261.6 Rio Grande At TX-259 Bridge, Canutillo, Tex. 1 300 9.5 1,680 66.8 -7.3 Lat31°54'54",long 106°36'06"

27 1,259.3 Rio Grande At Borderland Bridge near Borderland, Tex. 1400 11.5 1,690 65.1 -1.7 Lat31°53'09",long 106°35'55"

28 1,256.2 Rio Grande At TX-260 Bridge near Santa Teresa 1035 6.5 1,670 53.3 ,11.8 Lat 31°5Q-46", long 106°36'18"

29 1,252.8 Rio Grande Near Sunland Park 1150 9.5 1,700 55.0 +1.7 Lat31°48'24",long 106°34'57"

30 1,251.0 Wastewater inflow Sunland Plant, City of Sunland Park 1350 17.5 1,740 ^0.9 Lat 31°47'55", long 106°33'25"

31 1,250.9 Rio Grande At Sunland Park Bridge, Sunland Park 1400 12.0 1,690 56.1 +0.2 Lat31°47'56"( long 106°33'16"

32 1,250.3 Montoya Drain Near Sunland Park 1510 14.5 2,550 36.6 106°32'47"

103 Table 6.~Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 9-10,1990-Concluded

Discharge, in ft3/s

Water Specific Site temper- conduct- Gain num- River ature ance Main or her mile Stream______Location______Time (°C)___QiS/cm) stream Inflow loss

January 10. 1990

33 1,250.1 Keystone Reservoir Near El Paso, Tex. 1520 - - 0 outlet Lat 3r48'18", long 106°32'39"

34 1,249.9 Rio Grande At Courchesne Bridge, El Paso, Tex. 1510 13.5 2,010 97.6 +4.9 ______Lat31°48'09".long 106°32'26"______

I/Reported mean daily discharge.

104 Table 7. Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 8-9,1991

EXPLANATION

REACH The seepage investigation was conducted along a 62.4-mile reach from the Rio Grande below Leasburg Dam near Radium Springs, New Mexico, to the Rio Grande at El Paso, Texas (08364000). River miles are referenced upstream from the Rio Grande at El Paso, Texas, which is designated as river mile 1,249.9 (Hendricks, 1964).

WEATHER Weather was favorable for the seepage investigation; no precipitation occurred. Temperature extremes at Las Cruces, New Mexico, ranged from a low of 0 degrees Celsius on January 8 to a high of 16 degrees Celsius on January 8.

STREAMFLOW The seepage investigation was conducted during a period of constant base flow. Discharge measurements indicate a net seepage loss of 42.3 cubic feet per second from river mile 1,312.3 to river mile 1,249.9. Indicated gains (+) and losses (-) throughout the reach are shown below. Tributary flow recorded as inflow is considered a contribution and not a gain; no outflow (diversions) occurred during the investigation. Evaporation from the water surface of the river in January is considered negligible.

WATER QUALITY-Chemical analyses of water samples collected from the Rio Grande (six sites) during the seepage investigation are listed in table 9. Water samples were analyzed for major ions, selected nutrients, and selected trace elements.

GROUND-WATER LEVELS Ground-water levels were measured during the seepage investiga­ tion. Water levels in selected observation wells completed in the shallow flood-plain alluvium are listed in table 10.

REMARKS~The seepage investigation is rated good based upon steady streamflow conditions. Recorded river stage in the Rio Grande at NM-227 Bridge near Vado, New Mexico (site 17), indi­ cates a change in gage height from minus 0.76 foot on January 8 at 1500 hours to minus 0.78 foot on January 9 at 0925 hours. Individual discharge measurements were rated good (within 5 per­ cent) to fair (within 8 percent) throughout most of the stream reach. Discharge measurements were rated poor from river miles 1,295.6 through 1,293.1; recent channel excavation resulted in poor channel conditions at low flow. Accuracy of discharge measurements needs to be consid­ ered when evaluating indicated gains and losses.

°C, degrees Celsius; ^iS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius; ftVs, cubic feet per second; , no data or not applicable. Site number locations are shown in figure 8. Locations are in New Mexico unless otherwise indicated.

105 Table 7.~Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 8-9,1991-Continued

Discharge, in ft'/s

Water Specific Site temper- conduct- Gain nun- River ature ance Main or her mile Stream Location Time (°C) QlS/cm) stream Inflow loss

January 8, 1991

1 1,312.3 Rio Grande Below Leasburg Dam, Radium Springs 0955 8 1,400 38.4 Lat32°28>41",long 106055'10"

2 1,310.2 Rio Grande Near Leasburg 1110 8.5 1.420 39.8 +1.4 Lat32°27'2rMong 106°54'08"

3 1.307.6 Selden Drain Near Leasburg 1150 - -- - 0 Lat 32°25'38", long 106°52'50"

4 1.306.3 Rio Grande Near Hill 1220 - 1,590 48.5 +8.7 - Lat 32°25'05", long 106°52'01"

5 1,302.7 Rio Grande At Shalem Bridge near Dona Ana 1330 11 1,580 47.6 -0.9 Lat 32°22>34", long 106051'16"

6 1,301.2 Wastewayno.5 Near Dona Ana 1415 - -- 0 Lat32°22'14".long 106°50'14"

7 1.298.8 Rio Grande Near Kcacho 1000 5.5 1,580 57.4 +9.8 Lat 32°20'18", long 106°50'09"

8 1,295.6 Rio Grande Below Kcacho Bridge near Las Graces 1120 9 1.580 -"34.6 -22.8 Lat 32017'45", long 106°49'25"

9 1,295.4 Wastewater inflow City of Las Graces 1200 -- 1.100 *V2.9 Lat32°17>35".long 106°49'26"

10 1,293.1 Rio Grande At NM-359 Bridge near MesiUa 1315 10.5 1,500 54.7 +7.2 Lat 32°15'49", long 106°49'29"

11 1,291.8 Hcacho Drain Above Mesilla Dam 1410 9.5 1,450 2.16 - Lat 32°14'34". long 106°48'56"

12 1,291.7 Rio Grande Below Picacho Drain 1445 9.5 1.500 45.5 -11.4 Lat 32°14>30", long 106°48'49"

13 1,289.5 Rio Grande Below Mesilla Dam 1030 9 1.450 33.7 -11.8 Lat32°13'17",long 106°47'15"

14 1,287.3 Rio Grande At NM-28 Bridge near San Pablo 1345 - 1,460 31.0 -2.7 Lat 32°12>24". long 106045'32"

15 1,283.6 Santo Tomas River Near San Miguel 1400 - 0 Drain Lat 32010'16". long 106°43'1 1"

16 1.282.7 Rio Grande At NM-228 Bridge near San Miguel 1530 13.5 1,400 32.9 +1.9 Lat 32°09'43". long 106°42'5&"

17 1.277.8 Rio Grande At NM-227 Bridge near Vado 1530 14 1.440 30.4 -2.5 Lat 32°06>48", long 106°40'05"

106 Table 7. Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 8-9,1991-Continued

Discharge, in ft3/s

Water Specific Site temper­ conduct­ Gain nun- River ature ance Main or her mile Stream Location Time (°Q (|oS/cm) stream Inflow loss

January 9. 1991

17 1,277.8 Rio Grande At NM-227 Bridge near Vado 0915 5 1,450 29.0 - Lat 32°06'48", long 106°40'05"

18 1,276.6 Del Rio Drain Near Vado 1000 10.5 1,280 26.2 Lat 32°06'09", long 106°39'27"

19 1,273.8 Rio Grande At NM-226 Bridge near Berino 1045 9 1,380 53.4 -1.8 Lat 32°03'56". long 106°39'45"

20 1,271.6 La Mesa Drain Near Chamberino 1130 10.5 1.940 9.47 Lat32°02'15",long 106°39'23"

21 1,271.5 Rio Grande Below La Mesa Drain near Chamberino 1215 10.5 1,680 61.7 -1.2 Lat32°02'12",long 106°39'18"

22 1,268.5 Rio Grande At NM-225 Bridge near Anthony 0945 7.5 1,500 73.9 +12.2 Lat 31°59'58", long 106°38'07"

23 1,268.5 Pipe inflow At NM-225 Bridge near Anthony 1020 - 0.10 Lat 31°59>5y, long 106°38'07"

24 1,265.4 East Drain Near Vinton, Tex. 1040 9 3,190 6.77 Lat 31°58'09", long 106°36'17"

25 1,264.7 Rio Grande At Vinton Bridge near Vinton, Tex. 1 140 9 1,670 79.4 -1.4 Lat31°57'33",long 106°36'16"

26 1,261.6 Rio Grande At TX-259 Bridge, Canutillo, Tex. 1305 10 1,630 71.6 -7.8 Lat31°54'54",long 106°36'06"

27 1,259.3 Rio Grande At Borderland Bridge near Borderland, Tex. 1355 10.5 1,610 71.7 +0.1 Lat 31°53'09", long 106°35'55"

28 1.256.2 Rio Grande At TX-260 Bridge near Santa Teresa 1040 9.5 1,600 62.4 -9.3 Lat 31°50'46", long lOo^e'lS"

29 1,252.8 Rio Grande Near Sunland Park 1230 11 1,620 61.6 -0.8 Lat 31°48'24", long 106°34f57"

30 1,251.0 Waste water inflow Sunland Plant, City of Sunland Park 1300 19 1,870 %75 LatSWSS-.long 106°33'25"

31 1,250.9 Rio Grande At Sunland Park Bridge, Sunland Park 1405 115 1,600 59.6 -2.8 Lat31°47'56",long 106°33'16"

32 1,250.3 Montoya Drain Near Sunland Park 1640 2,640 34.7 Lat Sl^'lO", long 106°32f47"

107 Table 7. Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, January 8-9,1991-Concluded

Discharge, in ft3/s

Water Specific Site temper- conduct- Gain nun- River ature ance Main or her mile Stream______Location______Time (°C)___(uS/cm) stream Inflow loss

January 9.1991

33 1,250.1 Keystone Reservoir Near El Paso, Tex. 1500 13 5,720 0.08 outlet Lat 31°48' 18", long 106°32'39"

34 1,249.9 Rio Grande At Courchesne Bridge, El Paso, Tex. 1350 12 2,010 88.0 -6.4 ______Lat31°48109".long 106°32'26"______

I/ Rating. 2/ Reported discharge.

108 Table 8.-Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs to Vado, New Mexico, December 17,1991

EXPLANATION

REACH The seepage investigation was conducted along a 34.5-mile reach from the Rio Grande below Leasburg Dam near Radium Springs, New Mexico, to the Rio Grande at NM-227 Bridge near Vado, New Mexico. River miles are referenced upstream from the Rio Grande at El Paso, Texas (08364000), which is designated as river mile 1,249.9 (Hendricks, 1964).

WEATHER Weather was favorable for the seepage investigation on December 17. Light rain occurred throughout the Mesilla Valley on December 18 with intermittent heavy rain showers at El Paso, Texas. Temperature extremes at Las Cruces, New Mexico, ranged from a low of 2 degrees Celsius to a high of 11 degrees Celsius on December 17.

STREAMFLOW-The seepage investigation was conducted during a period of constant base flow. Discharge measurements indicate a net seepage loss of 12.8 cubic feet per second from river mile 1,312.3 to river mile 1,277.8. Indicated gains (+) and losses (-) throughout the reach are shown below. Tributary flow recorded as inflow is considered a contribution and not a gain; no outflow (diversions) occurred during the investigation. Evaporation from the water surface of the river in December is considered negligible.

WATER QUALITY-Chemical analyses of water samples collected from the Rio Grande (five sites) during the seepage investigation are listed in table 9. Water samples were analyzed for major ions, selected nutrients, and selected trace elements.

GROUND-WATER LEVELS Ground-water levels were measured during the seepage investiga­ tion. Water levels in selected observation wells completed in the shallow flood-plain alluvium are listed in table 10.

REMARKS-The seepage investigation was conducted from Radium Springs, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, on December 17-18,1991. Precipitation on December 18 resulted in rising river stage downstream from the Rio Grande at the NM-227 Bridge near Vado, New Mexico. Rio Grande seepage results are reported for December 17 only along the upstream reach from Radium Springs to Vado, New Mexico. Individual discharge measurements were rated good (within 5 percent) to fair (within 8 percent). Accuracy of discharge measurements needs to be considered when evaluating indicated gains and losses.

°C, degrees Celsius; nS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius; ftVs, cubic feet per second; -, no data or not applicable. Site number locations are shown in figure 8. Locations are in New Mexico.

109 Table 8. Rio Grande seepage investigation from Radium Springs to Vado, New Mexico, December 17,1991-Concluded

Discharge, in ft3/s

Water Specific Site temper­ conduct- Gain num- River ature ance Main or her mile Stream Location Time (°C) (fiS/cm) stream Inflow loss

December 17. 1991

1 1,312.3 Rio Grande Below Leasburg Dam, Radium Springs 1020 6 1,480 43.2 Lat32°28'41",long 106°55'10"

2 1,310.2 Rio Grande Near Leasburg 1200 7 1,450 48.9 +5.7 Lat32°27'2r,long 106054'08"

3 1.307.6 Selden Drain Near Leasburg 1215 0 Lat32°25'38",long 106°52'50"

4 1,306.3 Rio Grande Near Hill 1340 7 1,530 55.3 +6.4 Lat 32°25'05",long 106°52>01"

5 1,302.7 Rio Grande At Shalem Bridge near Dona Ana 1500 8 1,520 55.1 -0.2 Lat 32°22'34", long 106°51'16"

6 1,301.2 Wasteway no. 5 Near Dona Ana 1520 0 Lat 32°22' 14", long 1 06°50' 14"

7 1,298.8 Rio Grande Near Picacho 0925 5 1,500 58.5 +3.4 Lat32°20'18",long 106°50'09"

8 1,295.6 Rio Grande Below Picacho Bridge near Las Graces 1025 5 1,580 55.2 -3.3 Lat32°17'45",long 106°49'25"

9 1,295.4 Wastewater inflow City of Las Graces 1 100 1,020 *11.5 Lat 32°17'35", long 106°49'26"

10 1,293.1 Rio Grande At NM-359 Bridge near Mesffla 1 145 7 1,510 59.4 -7.3 Lat 32°15'49", long 106°49'29"

11 1,291.8 Picacho Drain Above Mesilla Dam 1315 7 1,400 4.30 Lat 32°14'34", long 106°48'56"

12 1,291.7 Rio Grande Below Picacho Drain 1400 9 1,520 52.8 -10.9 Lat 32°14'30", long 106°48'49"

13 1,289.5 Rio Grande Below Mesilla Dam 1040 5.5 1,540 45.6 -7.2 Lat32°13 > 17",long 106°47'15"

14 1,287.3 Rio Grande At NM-28 Bridge near San Pablo 1 300 8.5 1,500 46.1 +0.5 Lat 32°12'24", long 106°45'32"

15 1,283.6 Santo Tomas River Near San Miguel 1330 0 Drain Lat 32°10> 16", long 106043'11"

16 1,282.7 Rio Grande At NM-228 Bridge near San Miguel 1 520 9.5 1,490 50.6 +4.5 Lat 32009'43", long 106°42'58"

17 1,277.8 Rio Grande At NM-227 Bridge near Vado 1 525 11 1,490 46.2 -4.4 Lat 32°06'48", long 106°40'05"

Reported discharge. 110 Table 9.~Chemical analyses of water samples collected from the Rio Grande during seepage investigations, 1988 through 1992 water years [deg C, degrees Celsius; |aS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius; mg/L, milligrams per liter; dis it, dissolved incremental titration; tot it, total incremental titration; H-g/L, micrograms per liter; , no data; cols/100 mL, colonies per 100 milliliters; <, less than; site number locations are shown in figure 8]

Disharge, PH, instan­ Spe­ water, taneous cific whole Temper­ Temper­ (cubic conduct­ field ature, ature, Site feet per ance (standard air water number Station name Date Time second) (US/cm) units) (degQ (degQ

1 Rio Grande below Leasburg Dam, N. Mex. 01-05-88 0930 95 1,180 8.5 6.0 5.5 01-10-89 1105 33 1,650 8.2 7.5 3.0 01-09-90 1040 38 1,480 8.2 14.5 6.5 01-08-91 1030 38 1,370 83 9.0 8.0 12-17-91 1015 43 1,480 - 8.0 5.5

8 Rio Grande below Picacho Bridge near Las Cruces, N. Mex. 01-05-88 1145 102 1,350 83 17.0 8.0 01-10-89 1300 61 1,850 8.4 9.5 4.5 01-09-90 1330 36 1,650 83 19.5 12.0 01-08-91 1315 35 1490 8.4 13.0 12.0 12-17-91 1230 55 1,580 83 12.0 7.0

13 Rio Grande below Mesilla Dam near Santo Tomas, N. Mex. 01-05-88 1345 100 1,360 8.4 16.0 10.0 01-10-89 1510 45 1,650 8.3 10.5 9.0 01-09-90 1520 29 1,650 8.3 20.5 13.5 01-08-91 1500 34 1,470 8.7 17.0 14.0 12-17-91 1450 46 1,540 8.4 13.0 11.0

17 Rio Grande at NM-227 Bridge near Vado, N. Mex. 01-06-88 0915 91 1,300 8.4 9.5 8.0 01-11-89 1005 42 1,600 83 13.0 1.5 01-10-90 0915 26 1,680 83 5.0 4.0 01-09-91 0900 29 1,450 9.0 9.0 6.5 12-18-91 0925 48 1,490 8.4 8.0 7.5

26 Rio Grande at TX-259 Bridge, Canutillo, Tex. 01-06-88 1115 171 1,540 8.5 15.5 11.0 01-11-89 1215 105 1,800 8.4 12.5 65 01-10-90 1150 67 1,780 8.4 16.0 9.0 01-09-91 1115 72 1,590 8.6 18.5 9.0 12-18-91 1215 107 1,660 8.4 10.0 9.0

34 Rio Grande at El Paso, Tex. 01-06-88 1345 194 1,740 8.5 165 12.5 01-11-89 1500 122 2,100 8.4 13.5 10.5 01-10-90 1440 98 2,100 8.5 25.0 8.5 01-09-91 1510 88 2,010 8:7 13.5 13.0 Table 9.~Chemical analyses of water samples collected from the Rio Grande during seepage investigations, 1988 through 1992 water years-Continued

Coli- Hardness, Bicar­ form, Strep- Hard- noncarb Magne­ Potas­ bonate, fecal, tococci ness, dis­ Calcium, sium, Sodium, Sodium sium, water, Oxygen, Tur­ 0.7 fecal, total solved, dis­ dis­ dis­ ad­ dis­ dis it, Site dis- bid­ um-mf kfagar (mg/L field, as solved solved solved sorp­ solved field num- solved ity (cols/ (cols/ as CaCOg (mg/L (mg/L (mg/L tion (mg/L (mg/L as her Date (mg/L) (NTU) 100 mL) 100 mL) CaCO,) (mg/L) asCa) asMg) asNa) ratio asK) HCOp

1 01-05-88 1.9 _ 330 150 100 20 120 3 6.7 225 01-10-89 3.4 450 230 140 25 170 3 7.7 275 01-09-90 1.0 400 180 120 23 160 4 7.8 249 01-08-91 9.1 370 190 110 23 160 4 7.3 205 12-17-91 4.0 - 400 170 120 23 160 4 8.5 251

8 01-05-88 1.8 _ 360 160 110 21 140 3 8.6 237 01-10-89 2.6 460 220 140 26 190 4 11 276 01-09-90 0.20 430 200 130 24 190 4 11 263 01-08-91 15 400 210 120 24 190 4 11 217 12-17-91 18 - 400 160 120 24 180 4 11 278 Is) 13 01-05-88 2.3 _ 360 150 110 20 140 3 93 232 01-10-89 43 400 170 120 25 190 4 13 281 01-09-90 7.4 400 180 120 23 180 4 12 249 01-08-91 23 370 180 110 22 180 4 12 203 12-17-91 20 - 370 160 110 23 180 4 11 239

17 01-06-88 2.9 _ 360 150 110 20 140 3 92 225 01-11-89 - 5.8 410 180 120 26 190 4 10 276 01-10-90 2.7 400 180 120 24 180 4 11 249 01-09-91 7.6 370 150 110 22 180 4 11 225 12-18-91 8.8 - 370 150 110 22 180 4 11 239

26 01-06-88 62 _ 370 140 110 23 180 4 11 256 01-11-89 2.8 440 190 130 27 220 5 11 271 01-10-90 4.7 400 150 120 24 200 4 13 276 01-09-91 9.4 400 160 120 24 210 5 12 246 12-18-91 6.0 - 380 120 110 24 210 5 11 281

34 01-06-88 9.1 _ 380 140 110 24 220 5 9.9 260 01-11-89 ~ 4.5 _ 420 160 120 29 280 6 10 276 01-10-90 12 420 150 120 29 290 6 9.5 295 01-09-91 10.4 13 130 240 27 300 11 288 Table 9.~Chemical analyses of water samples collected from the Rio Grande during seepage investigations, 1988 through 1992 water years-Continued

Carbonate Alkalinity Solids, Solids, Nitro­ Nitro­ water, water, Chlo­ Fluo- Silica, residue sum of Nitro­ gen, Nitro­ gen, dissolved, dissolved, Sulfate, ride, ride, dis­ at 180 constit­ gen/ nitrate, . gen, nitrite, incremental tot it, dis­ dis­ dis­ solved degC, uents, nitrate, dis­ nitrite, dis­ titration, field field solved solved solved (mg/L dis­ dis­ total solved total solved Site (mg/L as (mg/L as (mg/L (mg/L (mg/L as solved solved (mg/L Cmg/L (mg/L (mg/L number Date COj) CaCOa) as SO^ asd) asp) Si02) (mg/L) (mg/L) asN) asN) asN) asN)

1 01-05-88 2 188 290 100 0.60 14 784 766 0.180 _ _ <0.010 01-10-89 0 225 380 150 0.50 20 1,020 1,030 0.340 0540 0.020 01-09-90 7 216 360 130 0.40 18 984 951 0.210 <0.010 01-08-91 7 180 350 140 0.20 14 930 914 0.090 _ 0.010 <0.010 12-17-91 10 222 370 150 0.60 17 1,160 986 0.460 0.490 0.010 0.010

8 01-05-88 7 206 300 120 0.60 15 845 841 0.160 _ _ <0.010 01-10-89 7 238 400 180 0.50 20 1,110 1,110 0.280 0.280 - 0.020 01-09-90 7 228 380 170 0.50 19 1,090 1,060 0.180 - - <0.010 01-08-91 7 190 370 170 0.40 15 1,030 1,020 _ <0.010 <0.010 12-17-91 5 236 380 180 0.70 17 1,150 1,060 0.350 0360 0.010 0.010

13 01-05-88 12 210 290 130 0.60 16 847 847 0.280 0.280 _ 0.040 01-10-89 0 230 360 180 0.50 21 1,030 1,060 0.970 0.970 0.230 01-09-90 10 220 350 170 0.60 20 1,080 1,020 1.45 1.45 0.250 01-08-91 12 186 320 170 0.40 15 972 953 1.23 133 0.170 0.170 12-17-91 12 216 340 160 0.70 17 1,050 980 0.990 0.990 0.110 0.110

17 01-06-88 12 204 290 130 0.60 16 832 845 0.590 0590 _ 0.060 01-11-89 0 226 350 180 0.60 20 1,040 1,050 1.27 1.27 0.130 01-10-90 10 220 330 170 0.60 18 1,120 1,000 2.32 232 0.280 01-09-91 22 220 310 170 0.30 10 940 960 1.80 1.82 0.200 0.180 12-18-91 10 212 320 150 0.70 14 1,110 946 1.48 1.48 0.120 0.120

26 01-06-88 10 226 340 160 0.60 18 987 985 0.600 0.600 _ 0.060 01-11-89 14 246 390 190 0.60 21 1,140 1,140 0.870 0.870 0.050 01-10-90 12 246 370 180 0.70 19 1,140 1,080 1.20 120 0.100 01-09-91 22 238 360 180 0.40 16 1,090 1,070 1.03 1.03 0.070 0.070 12-18-91 12 250 380 180 0.70 17 1,090 1,090 1.20 120 0.100 0.100

34 01-06-88 14 237 400 180 0.70 20 1,130 1,110 0.500 0.500 _ 0.070 01-11-89 19 258 470 220 0.60 25 1,320 1320 0.700 0.700 - 0.030 01-10-90 17 270 470 230 0.60 25 1,400 1,340 0.760 0.760 0.060 01-09-91 17 264 440 250 0.30 21 1360 - 0.750 0.760 0.050 0.040 Table 9.~Chemical analyses of water samples collected from the Rio Grande during seepage investigations, 1988 through 1992 water years-Continued

Nitro­ Nitro­ Nitro­ Phos­ Nitro­ gen Nitro­ gen, Nitro­ gen, am­ Phos­ Phos­ phorus gen, NO2+NO;,, gen, ammonia, gen, monia + Nitro­ Phos­ phorus, phorus ortho, dis­ ammonia, dis­ organic, organic, gen, phorus, dis­ ortho, dis­ total solved total solved total total total total solved total solved Site (mg/L (mg/L (mg/L (mg/L (mg/L (mg/L (mg/L (mg/L (mg/L (mg/L (mg/L number Date asN) asN) asN) asN) asN) asN) asN) asP) asP) asP) asP)

1 01-05-88 ^_ 0.180 0.040 0.050 0.26 030 0.48 0.010 0.020 _ 0.010 01-10-89 _ 0360 0.070 0.070 0.43 0.50 0.86 0.020 0.020 0.010 01-09-90 _ 0.210 0.050 0.050 035 0.40 0.61 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 01-08-91 0.100 0.100 0.020 0.020 <020 0.010 <0.010 <0.010 0.010 12-17-91 0.470 0.500 0.030 0.020 027 030 0.77 0.020 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010

8 01-05-88 _ 0.160 0.080 0.070 0.12 0.20 036 <0.010 <0.010 _ <0.010 01-10-89 0300 0.090 0.090 0.41 0.50 0.80 0.020 <0.010 - 0.020 01-09-90 _ 0.180 0.050 0.050 0.55 0.60 0.78 0.010 <0.010 0.010 01-08-91 <0.100 <0.100 0.010 0.020 _ <0.20 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 0.010 ' 12-17-91 0360 0370 0.040 0.030 0.26 030 0.66 0.020 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010

13 01-05-88 _ 0.320 0.780 0.770 0.32 1.1 1.4 0.440 0.450 _ 0.400 01-10-89 _ 1.20 2.40 1.90 0.60 3.0 42 1.20 1.10 - 1.10 01-09-90 _ 1.70 1.60 130 1.0 2.6 43 1.10 1.10 - 1.00 01-08-91 1.40 1.50 0.860 0.800 0.14 1.0 2.4 1.10 0.970 0.950 0.950 12-17-91 1.10 1.10 1.00 0.770 0.70 1.7 2.8 0.560 0.460 0.470 0.440

17 01-06-88 _ 0.650 0570 0.560 0.53 1.1 1.7 0.570 0.570 0.510 01-11-89 1.40 130 1.20 0.80 2.1 3.5 1.10 1.10 - 1.00 01-10-90 _ 2.60 1.00 0.920 1.0 2.0 4.6 1.40 1.50 1.10 01-09-91 ZOO 2.00 0240 0210 036 0.60 2.6 1.20 120 1.10 1.00 12-18-91 1.60 1.60 0.740 0.570 0.66 1.4 3.0 0.590 0.490 0.480 0.470

26 01-06-88 _ 0.660 0270 0.290 0.43 0.70 1.4 0.400 0.380 _ 0350 01-11-89 _ 0.920 0250 0290 0.95 12 2.1 0.470 0.430 0.400 01-10-90 _ 130 0260 0.290 0.74 1.0 23 0.460 0.430 0.430 01-09-91 1.10 1.10 0.070 0.090 023 030 1.4 0.580 0.550 0.570 0.600 12-18-91 1.30 130 0.160 0200 0.74 0.90 22 0330 0.240 0.230 0220

34 01-06-88 0.570 0.180 0200 032 0.70 13 0280 0240 _ 0210 01-11-89 _ 0.730 0.140 0.180 036 0.50 12 0.400 0370 0320 01-10-90 _ 0.820 0.160 0.160 0.84 1.0 IA 0360 0320 0320 01-09-91 0.800 0.800 0.060 0.050 024 030 1.1 0350 0.470 0.450 0.420 Table 9.~Chemical analyses of water samples collected from the Rio Grande during seepage investigations, 1988 through 1992 water years-Continued

Alum­ Beryl­ Chro­ inum, Arsenic, Barium, lium, Boron, Bromide, Cadmium, mium, Cobalt, Copper, Iron, dis­ dis­ dis­ dis­ dis­ dis- dis­ dis­ dis­ dis­ dis­ solved solved solved solved solved solved solved solved solved solved solved Site <»ig/L (US/l­ (H8/L (mg/L (us/l­ number Date asAl) as As) as Ba) as Be) asB) as Br) asCd) asCr) as Co) asCu) asFe)

1 01-05-88 <10 2 85 <0.5 , _ <1.0

8 01-05-88 <10 3 91 <0.5 _ <1.0 1 <3 5 3 01-10-89 <10 2 94 <0.5 240 0.27 <1.0 <1 <3 1 6 01-09-90 <10 2 90 <0.5 - - <1.0 1 <3 <10 5 01-08-91 20 2 110 <0.5 1.0 1 <3 1 10 12-17-91 <10 <* 100 - - <1.0 <* <3 <* 7

13 01-05-88 <10 1 91 <0.5 _ <1.0 1 <3 3 4 01-10-89 <10 2 99 <0.5 240 0.22 <1.0 <1 <3 3 8 01-09-90 10 2 94 <0.5 - - <1.0 1 <3 <10 13 01-08-91 20 2 110 <0.5 2.0 <1 <3 1 31 12-17-91 <10 2 97 - - <1.0

17 01-06-88 <10 1 98 <0.5 _ <1.0

26 01-06-88 <10 2 82 <0.5 _ <1.0 1 <3 3 4 01-11-89 <10 2 80 <0.5 250 0.23 <1.0 <1 <3 3 4 01-10-90 <10 2 76 <0.5 - <1.0 <1 <3 <10 7 01-09-91 <10 3 82 <0.5 <1.0 2 <3 1 9 12-18-91 <10 2 79 - - <1.0

34 01-06-88 <10 3 81 <0.5 _ <1.0 1 <3 2 5 01-11-89 <10 3 100 <10 330 0.28 <1.0 <1 <1 2 10 01-10-90 <10 4 100 <10 - <1.0 <1 1 2 10 01-09-91 20 4 <100 <10 _ - <1.0 2 <1 2 <10 Table 9.~Chemical analyses of water samples collected from the Rio Grande during seepage investigations, 1988 through 1992 water years-Concluded

Manga­ Molyb­ Sele- Stron- Vana­ Lead, Lithium, nese, Mercury, denum, Nickel, nium. Silver, tium, dium, Zinc, dis­ dis­ dis­ dis­ dis­ dis­ dis- dis- dis­ dis­ dis­ solved solved solved solved solved solved solved solved solved solved solved Site (MS/L (Mg/L (Mg/L (Mg/L (M-g/L (Hg/L (Hg/L (Mg/L

1 01-05-88 <5 96 22 02 10 <-, <1 <1.0 1,100 <6 11 01-10-89 <5 130 75 <0.1 <10 1 <1 1.0 1,500 <6 22 01-09-90 <10 120 46 0.1 <10 <10 <1 <1.0 1,400 <6 25 01-08-91 <1 120 37 0.1 <10 <1 <2 <1.0 1,300 <6 14 12-17-91

8 01-05-88 <5 120 7 0.2 <10

13 01-05-88 <5 120 3 0.1 <10 2 <1 <1.0 1,200 <6 25 01-10-89 <5 150 9 <0.1 <10 2 <1 1.0 1,500 <6 16 01-09-90 10 140 15 0.1 10 <10 <1 <1.0 1,500 <6 36 01-08-91 <1 140 13 02 <10 <1 <1 <1.0 1,300 <6 79 12-17-91

17 01-06-88 <5 110 6 02 10 2 <1 <1.0 1,200 <6 19 01-11-89 <5 150 17 ^0.1 <10 <1 <1 <1.0 1,500 <6 20 01-10-90 10 140 29 ^0.1 <10 <10 <1 <1.0 1,500 <6 10 01-09-91 <1 140 23 ^0.1 <10 <1 <1 <1.0 1,300 <6 65 12-18-91

26 01-06-88 <5 140 18 0.1 <10 2 <1 1.0 1,400 <6 11 01-11-89 <5 170 29 <0.1 <10 <1 <1 3.0 1,600 <6 13 01-10-90 <10 150 24 0.1 <10 <10 <1 <1.0 1,500 <6 7 01-09-91 <1 160 18 <0.1 10 1 <1 <1.0 1,400 <6 30 12-18-91

34 01-06-88 <5 160 62 0.1 10 2 <1 <1.0 1,400 <6 7 01-11-89 <5 200 100 <0.1 10 <1 <1 <1.0 1,700 2 20 01-10-90 <1 40 80 0.1 11 2 <1 <1.0 1,800 2 20 01-09-91 <1 190 60 <0.1 8 <1 <1 <1.0 1,700 7 <10 Table 10. Water levels in selected observation wells completed in the shallow flood-plain alluvium during Rio Grande seepage investigations, 1988 through 1992 water years

[Well locations shown in figure 8. USBR, Bureau of Reclamation] Altitude Water level, of land in feet Well surface below land Date number Well location (feet) surface measured Remarks 1 21S.01W.14.313 3,960 14.3 01-09-90 New well 14.4 01-09-91 USBR-41 14.4 12-16-91

2 21S.01W.24.214 3,950 15.0 01-09-90 New well 01-09-91 USBR-42 14.0 12-16-91

4 22S.01E.06.124 3,935 10.6 01-09-90 New well 10.8 01-09-91 USBR-43 10.6 12-16-91

5 22S.01E.09.241a 3,930.1 01-05-88 Well dry 01-11-89 Well dry 10.5 01-09-90 USBR-26 10.8 12-16-91

6 22S.01E.09.333 3,928.1 7.1 01-05-88 USBR-20 7.4 01-10-89 8.1 01-09-90 7.6 01-09-91 7.5 12-16-91

7 22S.01E.16.433 3,923.4 8.7 01-05-88 USBR-19 8.8 01-10-89 8.7 01-09-90 9.0 01-09-91 8.9 12-16-91

8 22S.01E.33.341 3,906.4 7.9 01-05-88 USBR-15 7.7 01-10-89 8.0 01-09-90

8.1 12-16-91

9 22S.01E.35.334 3,909.9 12.7 01-05-88 USBR-18 12.6 01-10-89 13.2 01-09-90 13.7 01-09-91 13.1 12-16-91

117 Table 10.~Water levels in selected observation wells completed in the shallow flood-plain alluvium during Rio Grande seepage investigations, 1988 through 1992 water years-Continued Altitude Water level, of land infect Well surface below land Date number Well location (feet) surface measured Remarks 10 22S.01E.35.334b 3,909.6 14.9 01-05-88 USBR-17 15.3 01-10-89 15.5 01-09-90 16.1 01-09-91 15.6 12-16-91

18 23S.01E.01.413 3,900 20.4 01-09-90 New well 21.1 01-09-91 USBR-44 21.2 12-16-91

19 23S.01E.09.433 3,894.7 7.5 01-05-88 USBR-16 7.8 01-10-89 8.7 01-09-90 8.9 01-09-91 8.8 12-16-91

22 23S.01E.14.241 3,890 16.2 01-09-90 New well 17.2 01-09-91 USBR-45 17.4 12-16-91

23 23S.01E.16.424 3,865.7 13.5 01-05-88 USBR-12 13.2 01-10-89 13.3 01-09-90 13.7 01-09-91 13.5 12-16-91

33 23S.01E.27.334 3,882.3 6.1 01-05-88 USBR-11 6.0 01-10-89 5.9 01-09-80 6.1 01-09-91 6.0 12-16-91

46 23S.02E.29.113 3,880 18.0 01-09-90 New well 18.6 01-09-91 USBR-47 19.1 12-16-91

53 24S.01E.01.223 3,880 15.4 01-09-90 New well 16.1 01-09-91 USBR-46 16.0 12-16-91

118 Table 10. Water levels in selected observation wells completed in the shallow flood-plain alluvium during Rio Grande seepage investigations, 1988 through 1992 water years-Continued Altitude Water level, of land in feet Well surface below land Date number Well location (feet) surface measured Remarks 54 24S.01E.11.112 3,870 5.8 01-09-9 New well 6.1 01-09-91 USBR-48 6.3 12-16-91

60 24S.02E.08.434a 3,862.9 01-05-88 Well plugged 01-10-89 Well plugged 8.7 01-09-90 USBR-13 9.4 01-08-91 8.8 12-16-91

61 24S.02E.09.433 3,861.9 9.8 01-05-88 USBR-14 9.1 01-10-89 9.1 01-09-90 9.8 01-08-91 9.4 12-16-91

80 24S.02E.22.242 3,851.4 7.4 01-05-88 USBR-10 10.3 01-10-89 7.3 01-09-90 8.1 01-08-91 7.7 12-16-91

81 24S.02E.23.342 3,848.6 01-05-88 Well plugged 01-10-89 Well plugged 8.5 01-09-90 USBR-9 9.3 01-08-91 9.0 12-16-91

82 24S.02E.28.334 3,850.5 11.0 01-05-88 USBR-8 10.6 01-10-89 10.6 01-09-90 11.9 01-08-91 11.8 12-16-91

91 25S.02E.01.411 3,835.3 7.1 01-05-88 USBR-25 7.5 01-11-89 ,_ 01-10-90 Silted 01-09-91 Silted 12-16-91 Silted

119 Table 10.~Water levels in selected observation wells completed in the shallow flood-plain alluvium during Rio Grande seepage investigations, 1988 through 1992 water years Continued Altitude Water level, of land in feet Well surface below land Date number Well location (feet) surface measured Remarks 92 25S.02E.04.114 3,847 11.9 01-05-88 USBR-7 11.6 01-10-89 11.9 01-09-90 12.0 01-08-91 11.8 12-16-91

93 25S.02E.23.212 3,828.6 8.6 01-05-88 USBR-6 8.2 01-10-89 8.5 01-09-90 7.2 01-08-91 7.8 12-16-91

94 25S.02E.25.322 3,821.3 9.9 01-05-88 USBR-5 9.3 01-10-89 9.8 01-09-90 9.6 01-08-91 9.7 12-16-91

98 25S.03E.20.421 3,818.9 7.1 01-05-88 USBR-24 6.8 01-11-89 7.1 01-10-90 6.8 01-08-91 6.5 12-16-91

99 25S.03E.28.343a 3,814.6 8.3 01-05-88 USBR-27 8.2 01-11-89 8.3 01-10-90 8.3 01-08-91 7.9 12-16-91

100 25S.03E.31.143 3,814.3 8.0 01-05-88 USBR-4 7.3 01-10-89 7.4 01-09-90 7.6 01-08-91 7.3 12-16-91

109 26S.02E.01.211 3,812.6 8.2 01-05-88 USBR-3 7.6 01-10-89 8.0 01-09-90 8.2 01-08-91 7.9 12-16-91

120 Table 10. Water levels in selected observation wells completed in the shallow flood-plain alluvium during Rio Grande seepage investigations, 1988 through 1992 water years-Continued Altitude Water level, of land in feet Well surface below land Date number Well location (feet) surface measured Remarks 116 26S.03E.04.122 3,810.5 9.5 01-05-88 USBR-21 9.4 01-11-89 9.9 01-09-90 9.6 01-08-91 9.2 12-16-91

117 26S.03E.08.221 3,809.0 9.4 01-05-88 USBR-23 9.4 01-11-89 9.6 01-10-90 10.1 01-08-91 9.3 12-16-91

118 26S.03E.09.221a 3,804.7 6.9 01-05-88 USBR-22 6.8 01-11-89 7.0 01-09-90 6.9 01-08-91 6.5 12-16-91

119 26S.03E.15.112 3,806.5 7.8 01-05-88 USBR-28 7.4 01-11-89 7.6 01-10-90 7.4 01-08-91 7.2 12-16-91

120 26S.03E.22.211 3,794.5 4.4 01-05-88 USBR-30 4.2 01-11-89 4.6 01-10-90 4.6 01-08-91 4.3 12-16-91

121 26S.03E.27.211 3,793.6 6.4 01-05-88 USBR-32 6.2 01-11-89 7.0 01-10-90 6.4 01-08-91 6.1 12-16-91

122 26S.03E.27.212 3,792.9 5.0 01-05-88 USBR-31 5.2 01-11-89 5.4 01-10-90 4.9 01-08-91 5.1 12-16-91

121 Table 10. Water levels in selected observation wells completed in the shallow flood-plain alluvium during Rio Grande seepage investigations, 1988 through 1992 water years Continued Altitude Water level, of land in feet Well surface below land Date number Well location (feet) surface measured Remarks 123 26S.03E.32.441 3,790.0 9.0 01-05-88 USBR-39 8.7 01-11-89 8.7 01-10-90 8.5 01-08-91 8.4 12-16-91

132 27S.03E.09.444 3,779.1 3.5 01-05-88 USBR-38 3.3 01-11-89 5.4 01-10-90 6.5 01-08-91 5.8 12-16-91

133 27S.03E.22.221 3,775 8.2 01-10-90 New well 8.6 01-08-91 USBR-49 8.5 12-16-91

134 27S.03E.28.314 3,771.2 7.9 01-05-88 USBR-1 7.7 01-10-89 7.6 01-10-90 7.7 01-08-91 7.4 12-16-91

135 27S.03E.32.124a 3,773.2 7.8 01-05-88 USBR-2 8.1 01-10-89 8.1 01-10-90 8.3 01-08-91 8.0 12-16-91

136 27S.03E.35.113 3,767 10.9 01-10-90 New well 13.1 01-08-91 USBR-50 12.1 12-16-91

156 JL 49-03-916 3,754.7 7.1 01-05-88 USBR-36 7.2 01-11-89 7.6 01-10-90 7.5 01-08-91 7.4 12-18-91

122 Table 10.~Water levels in selected observation wells completed in the shallow flood-plain alluvium during Rio Grande seepage investigations, 1988 through 1992 water years-Concluded Altitude Water level, of land in feet Well surface below land Date number Well location (feet) surface measured Remarks 158 JL 49-04-121 3,788.4 6.1 01-05-88 USBR-29 6.1 01-11-89 6.5 01-10-90 7.2 01-08-91 6.8 12-16-91

178 JL 49-04-701 3,755.5 6.4 01-05-88 USBR-37 6.2 01-11-89 7.1 01-10-90 7.0 01-08-91 6.8 12-18-91

179 JL 49-12-101 3,748.1 6.3 01-05-88 USBR-35 6.6 01-11-89 7.0 01-10-90 6.8 01-08-91 6.5 12-18-91

180 JL 49-12-117 3,747.3 5.7 01-05-88 USBR-33 6.3 01-11-89 8.4 01-10-90 6.1 01-08-91 5.8 12-18-91

181 JL 49-12-501 3,735.5 7.1 01-05-88 USBR-34 7.1 01-11-89 7.6 01-10-90 7.2 01-08-91 6.3 12-18-91

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFTICE: 1 995-6 74-4 76/25032

123