DOCSLIB.ORG

Neural Mechanisms Underlying Attention Deficits in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Neural Mechanisms Underlying Attention Deficits in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Neural Mechanisms Underlying Attention Deficits in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder by Stefanie Russman Block A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Psychology) in The University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Professor Israel Liberzon, Chair Assistant Professor Luke W. Hyde Research Assistant Professor Anthony P. King Associate Professor Sekhar C. Sripada Associate Professor Daniel H. Weissma Stefanie Russman Block [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7528-0882 © Stefanie Russman Block 2017 DEDICATION To all those suffering from mental illness, and to all those with an insatiable curiosity for knowledge. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am deeply grateful to everyone on my dissertation committee: Dr. Israel Liberzon for his support and guidance throughout the years, Dr. Anthony King for allowing me to test my hypotheses in his data set, Dr. Daniel Weissman for his input on task design and teaching mentorship, Dr. Chandra Sripada for help with fMRI methodology and use of ADHD measures, and Dr. Luke Hyde for his positive role in shaping the Clinical Science program. I am grateful to everyone in the Psychiatric Affective Neuroimaging Lab and the Trauma, Stress and Anxiety Research Program. Specifically, I would like to thank my research assistants – Michaela Milillo, Lisa Blake, Rachel John, Nicole Corso and Damaris Pop – for their help with subject recruitment, data collection and data analyses, Nita Patel for conducting the MRI scans, Dr. Liz Duval for clinical supervision, IRB assistance, and moral support, Dr. Rebecca Sripada for her contribution to the ideas in Experiment 1 and showing me the ropes of neuroimaging analyses, Yana Lokshina for her help with data analyses, and Dr. Jim Abelson for his feedback on the ideas and presentation of this dissertation. Lastly, I would like to thank Mike Angstadt and Daniel Kessler for their support with analyses. I would also like to thank all of participants who took part in the study, everyone in the Clinical Science area, and my funding sources: the UM Depression Center Strategic Translational Research Award, APA Division 19 Student Research Grant, UM Psychology Department, Rackham Graduate School, Oleshansky Memorial Fund, and the VA Ann Arbor MRI Pilot Scan Program. Lastly, I am also grateful to my parents, Rebecca and Richard Block, for their unwavering support, my husband, Charles Russman for his unconditional love, my in-laws, Helaine and Larry Russman, for treating me like their own daughter, and my siters and brother- in-law, Caryn and Adam Russman, for making me a part of the family. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION ………………………………………………………………………..... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ……………………………………………………………. iii LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………………... viii LIST OF FIGURES ……………………………………………………………………. x LIST OF APPENDICES ……………………………………………………………….. xii ABSTRACT …………………………………………………………………....…….… xiii CHAPTER I. Introduction ………………………………………………………………………… 1 What is attention?………………………………………………………………... 2 Neural circuitry of attention ……………………………………………………... 4 Posner’s attention model……………………………………………………. 4 Intrinsic connectivity networks of attention………………………………... 6 Integration of Posner’s model with intrinsic connectivity networks……….. 8 Attention Deficits in PTSD ……………………………………………………… 9 Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and PTSD ………………………. 9 PTSD performance on traditional neuropsychological tests.…….................. 11 Evidence for attention deficits in PTSD according to the Posner model…… 16 Abnormalities of intrinsic connectivity networks in PTSD………………….. 20 Methodological strengths and weakness…………………………………………. 22 Specific aims……………………………………………………………………… 25 II. Experiment 1: Behavioral and neural correlates of disrupted orienting............. 28 attention in posttraumatic stress disorder Materials and methods …………………………………………………………… 31 Participants………………………………………………………………….. 31 Measures……………………………………………………………………. 33 Data analyses………………………………………………………………. 35 iv Results ……………………………………………………………………………. 37 Demographics……………………………………………………………….. 37 ANT results..………………………………………………………………… 38 MRI results………………………………………………………………….. 40 Discussion………………………………………………………………………… 43 Attentional performance and PTSD…………………………………………. 43 Attentional performance and intrinsic network connectivity……………….. 45 Limitations ………………………………………………………………….. 48 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………... 49 III. Experiment 2: Resting-state functional connectivity predicts neural functioning on the ANT…………………………………………………………... 64 Methods …………………………………………………………………………. 66 Participants…………………………………………………………………... 67 Measures…………………………………………………………………….. 70 Procedure……………………………………………………………………. 70 FMRI data acquisition………………...…………………………………….. 70 Data Analyses……………………………………………………………….. 70 Results …………………………………………………………………………… 75 ANT behavior……………………………………………………………….. 75 ANT task activation……………………………………………………….. 76 ANT task connectivity…………………………………………………….. 77 Resting-state functional connectivity……………………………………….. 78 v Discussion ……...................................................................................................... 86 Modified Attention Network Task activates intrinsic connectivity networks 87 Resting-state nodes predict different patterns of task activation……………... 88 RsFC differentially predicts cue and target processing………………………. 91 RsFC inversely predicts on-task connectivity …………………………….…. 93 RsFC between canonical network nodes is not a strong predictor of behavior 95 Limitations…………………………………………………………………… 98 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………… 99 IV. Experiment 3: Neural Mechanisms of Attention Deficits in PTSD……….…… 142 Methods……………………………………………………………………………. 145 Participants………………………………………………………………………… 146 Measures……………………………………………………………………... 146 Procedure…………………………………………………………………….. 146 Data Analyses………………………………………………………………... 146 Results……………………………………………………………………………… 151 Demographics……………………………………………………………….. 151 Part 1. ANT behavior and neural correlates…………………………………. 152 Part 2. Resting-state connectivity independent of task performance………… 160 Part 3. Exploratory analyses…………………………………………………. 161 Discussion ……...………………………………………………………………….. 162 PTSD deficits in utilization of spatial information….......…………………... 163 Salience network intrusions during spatial cue processing in PTSD……….. 166 Abnormal default mode network functional during target processing in…… 167 PTSD PTSD participants show increased demands on task positive regions………. 169 Trauma exposed controls also show differential attention processing………. 170 Failure to replicate resting-state functional connectivity abnormalities in…… 172 PTSD Limitations…………………………………………………………………………… 174 vi Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………… 175 V. General Discussion………………………………………………………………… 193 APPENDICIES ………………………………………………………………………… 196 REFERENCES ………………………………………………………………………… 265 vii LIST OF TABLES 2.1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants………………………….. 51 2.2. Regions of interest for connectivity analyses ……………………………………… 52 2.3. Reaction time on the ANT in the PTSD and control group………………………... 53 2.4. Accuracy on the ANT in the PTSD and control group…………………………….. 54 2.5. Correlation of DAN (MFG seed) connectivity with the orienting effect…………… 55 2.6. Correlation of SN (dACC seed) connectivity with the orienting effect……………. 56 3.1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants………………………….... 100 3.2. Neural activation during the ANT in all participants……………………………….. 102 3.3. Neural activation during the ANT in NTC group…………………………………… 103 3.4. On-task connectivity: PPI results of the ANT in all participants…………………… 104 3.5. On-task connectivity: PPI results of the ANT in NTC group………………………. 105 3.6. Resting-state functional connectivity of VAN, DAN, SN and DMN in all………… 106 participants 3.7. Resting-state functional connectivity of VAN, DAN, SN and DMN in NTC group.. 107 3.8. Correlation of testing-state functional connectivity with ANT performance in all... 108 participants 3.9. Correlation of testing-state functional connectivity with ANT performance in…. 110 NTC group 3.10. VAN connectivity predictors of neural activation during Alerting in all participants 111 3.11. VAN connectivity predictors of neural activation during Alerting in NTC group….. 112 3.12. DAN connectivity predictors of neural activation during Orienting in all………….. 113 participants 3.13. DAN connectivity predictors of neural activation during Orienting in NTC group... 114 3.14. VAN and DAN connectivity predictors of neural activation during Validity in all… 115 participants 3.15. VAN and DAN connectivity predictors of neural activation during Validity………. 116 in NTC group viii 3.16. VAN and DAN connectivity predictors of neural activation during ………………. 117 Disengagement in all participants 3.17. VAN and DAN connectivity predictors of neural activation during ……………… 118 Disengagement in NTC group 3.18. SN (dACC seed) connectivity predictors of neural activation during ……………… 119 Conflict in all participants 3.19. SN (dACC seed) connectivity predictors of neural activation during ……………… 120 Conflict in NTC group 3.20. Resting-state connectivity predictors of functional connectivity during the ANT in.. 121 all participants 3.21. Resting-state connectivity predictors of functional connectivity during the ANT in.. 123 NTC group 3.22. Results summary of resting-state functional connectivity predicting task positive… 125 neutral and negative activity and connectivity on the ANT
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neural Measures of Visual Attention and Suppression As Biomarkers for ADHD- Associated Inattention
    Neural Measures of Visual Attention and Suppression as Biomarkers for ADHD- associated Inattention Rebecca Elizabeth Townley PhD University of York Psychology August 2019 Abstract Abstract Whilst there is a wealth of literature examining neural differences in those with ADHD, few have investigated visual-associated regions. Given extensive evidence demonstrating visual-attention deficits in ADHD, it is possible that inattention problems may be associated with functional abnormalities within the visual system. By measuring neural responses across the visual system during visual-attentional tasks, we aim to explore the relationship between visual processing and ADHD-associated Inattention in the typically developed population. We first explored whether differences in neural responses occurred within the superior colliculus (SC); an area linked to distractibility and attention. Here we found that Inattention traits positively correlated with SC activity, but only when distractors were presented in the right visual field (RVF) and not the left visual field (LVF). Our later work followed up on these findings to investigate separate responses towards task-relevant targets and irrelevant, peripheral distractors. Findings showed that those with High Inattention exhibited increased responses towards distractors compared to targets, while those with Low Inattention showed the opposite effect. Hemifield differences were also observed where those with High Inattention showed increased RVF distractor-related signals compared to those with Low Inattention. No differences were observed for the LVF. Finally, we examined attention and suppression-related neural responses. Our results indicated that, while attentional responses were similar between Inattention groups, those with High Inattention showed weaker suppression responses towards the unattended RVF. No differences were found when suppressing the LVF.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neuropsychological Functioning of Men Residing in a Homeless Shelter
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Dissertations (1934 -) Projects The Neuropsychological Functioning of Men Residing in a Homeless Shelter Sara Murray Hegerty Marquette University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu Part of the Psychiatry and Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Hegerty, Sara Murray, "The Neuropsychological Functioning of Men Residing in a Homeless Shelter" (2009). Dissertations (1934 -). 3. https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/3 THE NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL FUNCTIONING OF MEN RESIDING IN A HOMELESS SHELTER by Sara Murray Hegerty, M.A. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin August 2010 ABSTRACT THE NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL FUNCTIONING OF MEN RESIDING IN A HOMELESS SHELTER Sara Murray Hegerty, M.A. Marquette University, 2010 The number of homeless individuals in the U.S. has continued to increase, with men comprising the majority of this population. These men are at substantial risk for neuropsychological impairment due to several factors, such as substance misuse, severe mental illness, untreated medical conditions (e.g., diabetes, liver disease, HIV/AIDS), poor nutrition, and the increased likelihood of suffering a traumatic brain injury. Impairments in attention, memory, executive functioning, and other neuropsychological domains can result in poor daily functioning and difficulty engaging in psychological, medical, or educational services. Thus, knowledge of the neuropsychological functioning of homeless men is critical for those who work with this population. Yet data in this area are limited. This study aimed to describe the functioning of men residing in an urban homeless shelter across the domains of attention/concentration, memory, executive functions, language, sensory-motor abilities, general intelligence, and reading ability.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Flanker Task
    Individual differences in uncertainty tolerance are not associated with cognitive control functions in the flanker task Philipp Alexander Schroeder1,3, David Dignath2, and Markus Janczyk3 1 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen 2 Department of Psychology, University of Freiburg 3 Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION IN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (23 FEB 18) UNCERTAINTY TOLERANCE & COGNTIVE CONTROL 2 Short title Uncertainty tolerance & cognitive control Correspondence Dipl.-Psych. Philipp A. Schroeder Dept. of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen Calwerstr. 14 72076 Tübingen Mail: [email protected] Tel.: +49 7071 29 80815 Fax.: +49 7071 29 5904 Sponsors Work of MJ is supported by the Institutional Strategy of the University of Tübingen (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [German Research Foundation], ZUK 63). Work of DD is supported by a grant within the Priority Program, SPP 1772 (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [German Research Foundation], DI 2126/1-1). Acknowledgments The authors thank Lea Johannsen for help with pseudo-randomization procedure in Exp.2. Word count 4929 words Number of figures 5 Number of tables 1 URL to raw data publication https://osf.io/fmqu8/?view_only=398c1e5b4b4743f7af309a7ffca52660 UNCERTAINTY TOLERANCE & COGNTIVE CONTROL 3 Abstract Cognitive control refers to the ability to make correct decisions concurrent to distracting information, and to adapt to conflicting stimulus configurations, eventually promoting goal-directed behavior. Previous research has linked individual differences in cognitive control to psychopathological conditions such as anxiety. However, a link with uncertainty tolerance (UT) has not been tested so far, although both constructs describe cognitive and behavioral performance in ambiguous situations, thus they share some similarities.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence from the Eriksen Flanker Task and the Spatial Conflict Task
    2007 • volume 3 • no 3 • 389-396 Advances in Cognitive Psychology Conditional accuracy in response interference tasks: Evidence from the Eriksen flanker task and the spatial conflict task John F. Stins1,2, J. C. Tinca Polderman1, Dorret I. Boomsma1, and Eco J. C. de Geus1 1 Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2 Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences,VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Received xx.xx.2007 Accepted xx.xx.2007 Keywords response interference, sequential analysis, accuracy, Simon task, flanker ABSTRACT CAFs revealed that in both tasks congruency and sequential trial effects on accuracy are found only Two well-known response interference tasks are in trials with fast responses (< 600 ms). Sequen- the Eriksen flanker task and the spatial conflict tial trial effects on accuracy were weaker for the task. The tasks are logically equivalent, and com- flanker task than for the spatial conflict task. In parable effects of current and previous stimu- very fast trials (< 400 ms) response activation by lus type (congruent or incongruent) have been distracting flankers led to below-chance perform- shown with regard to reaction time (RT). Here, ance in the flanker task, but response activation we investigated whether interference and se- by incongruent spatial location did not lead to quential trial effects also had comparable effects below-chance performance in the spatial conflict on accuracy. We specifically tested whether these task. The pattern of results hints at subtle dif- effects interacted with the speed of responding ferences in processing architecture between the using conditional accuracy functions (CAFs). The tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • Haloperidol Impairs Learning and Error-Related Negativity in Humans
    Haloperidol Impairs Learning and Error-related Negativity in Humans Patrick J. Zirnheld, Christine A. Carroll, Paul D. Kieffaber, Brian F. O’Donnell, Anantha Shekhar, and William P. Hetrick Abstract & Humans are able to monitor their actions for behavioral Performance Task, the Eriksen Flanker Task, and a learning- conflicts and performance errors. Growing evidence suggests dependent Time Estimation Task. Haloperidol significantly that the error-related negativity (ERN) of the event-related attenuated ERN amplitudes recorded during the flanker task, cortical brain potential (ERP) may index the functioning of impaired learning of time intervals, and tended to cause this response monitoring system and that the ERN may de- more errors of commission, compared to placebo, which pend on dopaminergic mechanisms. We examined the role did not significantly differ from diphenhydramine. Drugs of dopamine in ERN and behavioral indices of learning by had no significant effects on the stimulus-locked P1 and N2 administering either 3 mg of the dopamine antagonist (DA) ERPs or on behavioral response latencies, but tended to af- haloperidol (n = 17); 25 mg of diphenhydramine (n = 16), fect post-error reaction time (RT) latencies in opposite ways which has a similar CNS profile but without DA proper- (haloperidol decreased and diphenhydramine increased ties; or placebo (n = 18) in a randomized, double-blind RTs). These findings support the hypothesis that the DA manner to healthy volunteers. Three hours after drug ad- system is involved in learning and the generation of the ministration, participants performed a go/no-go Continuous ERN. & INTRODUCTION subjects need to have learned a representation of the Humans are able to monitor their actions for behavioral goal behavior for this negativity to be observed conflicts and performance errors, and then modify (Holroyd & Coles, 2002; Dehaene et al., 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Flanker Paradigm Contains Conflict and Distraction Factors with Distinct Neural Mechanisms: an ERP Analysis in a 2-1 Mapping Task
    Cognitive Neurodynamics (2019) 13:341–356 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-019-09529-w (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV) RESEARCH ARTICLE Flanker paradigm contains conflict and distraction factors with distinct neural mechanisms: an ERP analysis in a 2-1 mapping task 1 1 1 2 Shu Zhou • Shenglan Xiong • Wenwen Cheng • You Wang Received: 1 March 2018 / Revised: 25 February 2019 / Accepted: 18 March 2019 / Published online: 22 March 2019 Ó Springer Nature B.V. 2019 Abstract Behavioral studies using the flanker 2-1 mapping task suggest that both stimulus and response conflicts contribute to flanker conflict effect. However, both are intertwined with distraction effect. Their underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear. We applied a perceptual flanker 2-1 mapping task to 24 healthy young adults, while the event-related potentials were recorded. The task included stimulus-incongruent (SI), response-incongruent (RI), congruent (CO) and neutral (NE) stimuli. Our reaction time data demonstrated conflict effect, distraction effect and their interaction. Furthermore, the conflict factor successively enhanced the frontal P2 (160–240 ms), the posterior N2pc (200–240 ms), the fronto-central and the right frontal N2b (240–420 ms), and the posterior N2c (320–420 ms). Only the frontal P2 was larger for RI than SI. The distraction factor increased the right N2pc and reduced the left parietal P3b (460–480 ms). Overall, our findings suggested that the flanker conflict involved an early attentional processing of task-relevant and distractive information, and a later processing of conflict evaluation and response inhibition. Keywords Cognitive control Á Flanker conflict Á Distraction Á 2-1 mapping Á Event-related potentials (ERP) Á Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) Introduction task (Simon and Rudell 1967), and Eriksen flanker task (Eriksen and Eriksen 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • Running Head: NEURAL CORRELATES of ATTENTIONAL CONTROL THEORY 1
    Running head: NEURAL CORRELATES OF ATTENTIONAL CONTROL THEORY 1 NEURAL CORRELATES OF ATTENTIONAL CONTROL THEORY IN HIGH TRAIT ANXIOUS INDIVIDUALS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF ARTS IN CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY BY RICHARD T. WARD DR. STEPHANIE SIMON-DACK – ADVISOR BALL STATE UNIVERSITY MUNCIE, INDIANA JULY 2017 NEURAL CORRELATES OF ATTENTIONAL CONTROL THEORY 2 Neural Correlates of Attentional Control Theory in High Trait Anxious Individuals Trait anxiety, as defined by Spielberger (1966), involves the experience of excessive worry, nervousness, and apprehension for a prolonged period of time. Individuals displaying maladaptive high levels of trait anxiety have demonstrated a variety of impairments across multiple cognitive domains including working memory. Attentional Control Theory provides an explanation as to how maladaptive high trait anxiety can impact working memory through the impairment of central executive functions (Eysenck & Derakshan, 2011), and a number of behavioral investigations have provided evidence in support of this theory (Eysenck, Paynea, & Derakshan., 2005; Derakshan & Eysenck, 2009; Ansari & Derakshan, 2010; Johnson, 2009; Ansari, Derakshan, & Richards, 2008; Murray & Jannell, 2003). However there is currently a lack in understanding of the underlying neural processes that give rise to Attentional Control Theory’s components. Therefore, the goal of the current study was to investigate the underlying neural correlates of the tenets of Attentional Control Theory. By understanding the neural mechanisms of maladaptive high trait anxiety, we gain a greater knowledge of the underlying processes of trait anxiety, and how it impacts the neural mechanisms involved with central executive functions. Trait Anxiety Spielberger (1966) defined trait anxiety as a personality trait, in which individuals high it are more prone to experience intense feelings of apprehension, tension, and excessive worry for a prolonged duration.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequential Sampling Models of the Flanker Task: Model Comparison and Parameter Validation
    Sequential sampling models of the flanker task: Model comparison and parameter validation Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Corey Nathan White, M. A. Graduate Program in Psychology The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Roger Ratcliff, Advisor Gail McKoon Simon Dennis Alex Petrov Copyright Corey Nathan White 2010 Abstract The present study tests sequential sampling models of processing in the flanker task. In a standard flanker task, participants must identify a central target that is flanked by items that indicate the same response (congruent) or the opposite response (incongruent). The standard finding is that incongruent flankers produce interference that primarily affects the early component of the decision process. The goal was to contrast different mechanisms of visual attention and to identify a simple processing model that can be used to augment analyses of this task. Several models were contrasted in their ability to account for flanker data from experiments that manipulated response bias, speed/accuracy tradeoffs, attentional focus, and stimulus configuration. Models that assume dynamic focusing of attention provided the best overall account of the behavioral data. Among the dynamic models, a spotlight model that assumes gradual narrowing of attention provided the best balance of fit and parsimony, though dual process models that assume discrete selection of the target also captured the main trends in the data when only standard congruent and incongruent conditions were used. Importantly, the ii experimental manipulations were reflected by the appropriate model parameters, supporting future use of these models to decompose behavioral data from the flanker task into meaningful psychological constructs.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Robust Cognitive Tasks Do Not Produce Reliable Individual Differences
    Behav Res DOI 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1 The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences Craig Hedge1 & Georgina Powell1 & Petroc Sumner1 # The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract Individual differences in cognitive paradigms are such reliability estimates into account has the potential to qual- increasingly employed to relate cognition to brain structure, itatively change theoretical conclusions. The implications of chemistry, and function. However, such efforts are often un- our findings are that well-established approaches in experimen- fruitful, even with the most well established tasks. Here we tal psychology and neuropsychology may not directly translate offer an explanation for failures in the application of robust to the study of individual differences in brain structure, chem- cognitive paradigms to the study of individual differences. istry, and function, and alternative metrics may be required. Experimental effects become well established – and thus those – tasks become popular when between-subject variability is Keywords Reliability . Individual differences . Reaction low. However, low between-subject variability causes low re- time . Difference scores . Response control liability for individual differences, destroying replicable corre- lations with other factors and potentially undermining pub- lished conclusions drawn from correlational relationships. Though these statistical issues have a long history in psychol- ogy, they are widely overlooked in cognitive psychology and Individual differences have been an annoyance rather neuroscience today. In three studies, we assessed test-retest than a challenge to the experimenter. His goal is to reliability of seven classic tasks: Eriksen Flanker, Stroop, control behavior, and variation within treatments is stop-signal, go/no-go, Posner cueing, Navon, and Spatial- proof that he has not succeeded… For reasons both Numerical Association of Response Code (SNARC).
    [Show full text]
  • Parsing the Flanker Task to Reveal Behavioral and Oscillatory
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Parsing the Flanker task to reveal behavioral and oscillatory correlates of unattended confict Received: 21 March 2019 Accepted: 10 September 2019 interference Published: xx xx xxxx Marcella Brunetti1,2, Filippo Zappasodi1,2, Pierpaolo Croce1 & Rosalia Di Matteo1 Stimulus-Response confict is generated by an overlap between stimulus and response dimensions, but the intrinsic nature of this interaction is not yet deeply clarifed. In this study, using a modifed Eriksen fanker task, we have investigated how fankers have to be incongruent to target in order to produce an interference and whether and how this interference interacts with the one produced by Stimulus features overlap. To these aims, an Eriksen-like task employing oriented hands\arrows has been designed to distinguish between two types of Stimulus-Response (S-R) interferences: one derived by a short-term association and one based on automatic processes. Stimulus-Stimulus (S-S) confict has been also included in the same factorial design. Behavioral, Event Related Potential (ERP) and oscillatory activity data have been measured. Results revealed distinct S-S and automatic S-R efects on behavioral performance. ERP and Theta band power modulation results suggested an early frontal S-S confict processing followed by a posterior simultaneous S-S and automatic S-R confict processing. These fndings provide evidence that, in presence of diferent conficts, the sequence of stimulus identifcation and response selection could not move forward in a linear serial direction, but it may involve further efort, mirrored in posterior late components and response time prolongation. In the last three decades, several studies have been conducted into the frame of cognitive control to investigate the dynamic of confict monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Modulation of Sensory Distractor Processing Induced by Late Response Conflict
    It’s the Other Way Around! Early Modulation of Sensory Distractor Processing Induced by Late Response Conflict Bernhard Pastötter and Christian Frings Abstract ■ Understanding the neural processes that maintain goal- ization effect in (both evoked and induced) theta power (3–6Hz) directed behavior is a major challenge for the study of attentional that was more pronounced in incompatible than compatible control. Although much of the previous work on the issue has trials. The sensory lateralization effect preceded in time a mid- focused on prefrontal brain areas, little is known about the frontal conflict effect that was indexed by an increase of (induced) contribution of sensory brain processes to the regulation of atten- theta power (6–9 Hz) in incompatible compared with compatible tional control. The present EEG study examined brain oscillatory trials. The findings indicate an early modulation of sensory dis- activities invoked in the processing of response conflict in a later- tractor processing induced by response conflict. Theoretical im- alized Eriksen single-flanker task, in which target letters were plications of the findings, in particular with respect to the theory presented at fixation and single distractor letters were presented of event coding and theories relating to stimulus–response bind- either left or right to the targets. Distractors were response ing [Henson, R. N., Eckstein, D., Waszak, F., Frings, C., & Horner, compatible, response incompatible, or neutral in relation to the A. Stimulus-response bindings in priming. Trends in Cognitive responses associated with the targets. The behavioral results Sciences, 18, 376–384, 2014; Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, showed that responses to targets in incompatible trials were G., & Prinz, W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Mindfulness Meditation on Affect and Attention an Empirical Study
    The Effect of Mindfulness Meditation on Affect and Attention An Empirical Study Bachelor Degree Project in Cognitive Neuroscience Basic level 22.5 ECTS Spring term 2019 Jonathan Bryde Supervisor: Kristoffer Ekman Examiner: Antti Revonsuo Running Head: MINDFULNESS MEDITATION 2 Abstract In daily life there are numerous experiences and events that divert people's attention and cause stress, which may be linked with aspects of ill-being and lowered well-being. Mindfulness meditation may alleviate such issues. Mindfulness can be summarized as a form of awareness and attention in the present that is characterized by an open-minded and non-judgemental perspective, and meditation as a group of practices that engage many of the same processes and may involve mindfulness. There is evidence that both mindfulness and mindfulness meditation are associated with activity in brain regions relating to, for example, attention, emotion-regulation, and bodily awareness. Consequently, mindfulness meditation was hypothesized in the present study to improve attention as measured by the Attention Network Test, and decrease negative affect as measured by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule when compared to a control condition. The mindfulness meditation instructions employed were largely based on the work of Kabat-Zinn (1982). 14 participants were recruited to the study, and 7 of them completed the experiment. 3 participants were randomized to the experimental group, and 4 to the control group. Results were largely contrary to the hypotheses, with only executive attention having statistical significance (p < .05) and supporting one hypothesis. Although effect sizes were on average large for the variables of the study, the small sample size may have limited the power and increased the risk for type-II errors.
    [Show full text]