Advances in Scientific Meditation and Stress Coping
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Stenographer (Post Code-01)
LIST OF CANDIDATES TO BE CALLED FOR WRITTEN EXAMINATION ON 17.08.2014 (SUNDAY) FOR THE POST OF STENOGRAPHER (POST CODE-01) SNo. NAME OF THE APPLICANT FATHER'S/HUSBAND'S NAME DOB CAT. PRESENT ADDRESS 1 AAKANKSHA ANIL KUMAR 28.09.1991 UR B II 544 RAGHUBIR NAGAR NEW DELHI -110027 H.NO. -539, SECTOR -15-A , FARIDABAD (HARYANA) - 2 AAKRITI CHUGH CHARANJEET CHUGH 30.08.1994 UR 121007 3 AAKRITI GOYAL AJAI GOYAL 21.09.1992 UR B -116, WEST PATEL NAGAR, NEW DELHI -110008 4 AAMIRA SADIQ MOHD. SADIQ BHAT 04.05.1989 UR GOOSU PULWAMA - 192301 WZ /G -56, UTTAM NAGAR NEAR, M.C.D. PRIMARY 5 AANOUKSHA GOSWAMI T.R. SOMESH GOSWAMI 15.03.1995 UR SCHOOL, NEW DELHI -110059 R -ZE, 187, JAI VIHAR PHASE -I, NANGLOI ROAD, 6 AARTI MAHIPAL SINGH 21.03.1994 OBC NAJAFGARH NEW DELHI -110043 PLOT NO. -28 & 29, J -1 BLOCK, PART -1, CHANAKYA 7 AARTI SATENDER KUMAR 20.01.1990 UR PLACE, NEAR UTTAM NAGAR, DELHI -110059 SANJAY NAGAR, HOSHANGABAD (GWOL TOLI) NEAR 8 AARTI GULABRAO THOSAR GULABRAO BAKERAO THOSAR 30.08.1991 SC SANTOSHI TEMPLE -461001 I B -35, N.I.T. FARIDABAD, NEAR RAM DHARAM KANTA, 9 AASTHA AHUJA RAKESH KUMAR AHUJA 11.10.1993 UR HARYANA -121001 VILL. -MILAK TAJPUR MAFI, PO. -KATHGHAR, DISTT. - 10 AATIK KUMAR SAGAR MADAN LAL 22.01.1993 SC MORADABAD (UTTAR PRADESH) -244001 H.NO. -78, GALI NO. 02, KHATIKPURA BUDHWARA 11 AAYUSHI KHATRI SUNIL KHATRI 10.10.1993 SC BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) -462001 12 ABHILASHA CHOUHAN ANIL KUMAR SINGH 25.07.1992 UR RIYASAT PAWAI, AURANGABAD, BIHAR - 824101 VILL. -
Total No. of Diesel Vehicles Registered in RAJA GARDEN Before 07-Nov-2001 Not Have Valid
Total No. of Diesel Vehicles is registered before 07-nov-2001 or 15 years old and not have valid fitness on 08-nov-2016 Sno regn_no regn_dt fit_upto owner_name f_name p_add1 p_add2 p_add3 p_pincode descr off_name 68886 DL4CM1773 27-04-2000 26-04-2015 SATISH KUMAR SHRI RAM 76/9 KISHAN GARH VILLAGE NEW DELHI 110000 DIESEL RAJA GARDEN 68887 DL4CM5006 11-10-2000 10-10-2015 RAMESHWAR DAYAL GUPTA A PRASAD G-2/43 & 44 MANGOL PURI NEW DELHI 110083 DIESEL RAJA GARDEN 68888 DL4CJ3024 06-07-1999 05-07-2014 KISHAN LAL HARISH CHANDER E-144 NAND RAM PARK MAHAVIR ENCLAVE-III NEW DELHI 110000 DIESEL RAJA GARDEN 68889 DL4CM4533 14-09-2000 13-09-2015 VIJAY GUPTA HARI KISHAN 454 ASOLA FATEH PUR BERI NEW DELHI 110030 DIESEL RAJA GARDEN 68890 DL4CM5542 15-11-2000 14-11-2015 MOHAMMAD FIROZ MOHAMMAD YASEEN 11123 STREET LEATHER WALI IDGAH ROAD PAHAR GANJ NEW DELHI 110055 DIESEL RAJA GARDEN 68891 DL4CM8833 07-06-2001 06-06-2016 SATYAPAL NARANG NA 188 AVTAR INCLAVE PASCHIM VIHAR NEW DELHI 0 DIESEL RAJA GARDEN 68892 DL4CM8857 08-06-2001 07-06-2016 PANKAJ SHARMA SH MADAN LAL A-383 SHASTRI NAGAR DELHI . 0 DIESEL RAJA GARDEN 68893 DL4CM8941 12-06-2001 11-06-2016 NEW AGE HOSE MFG.CO. J-6-151 RAJOURI GDN EXTN NEW DELHI 27 . 0 DIESEL RAJA GARDEN 68894 DL4CM8978 14-06-2001 12-06-2016 POOJA SHARMA NA C 6A/27-A JANAK PURI NEW DELHI 0 DIESEL RAJA GARDEN 68895 DL4CM9354 04-07-2001 03-07-2016 M/S A K INDUSTRIES NA D-71 SUDERSHAN PARK NEW DELHI-15 0 DIESEL RAJA GARDEN 68896 DL4CM9182 25-06-2001 24-06-2016 NATIONAL INSU CO LTD NA C-3, PUJA HOUSE KARAM PURA NEW DELHI 0 DIESEL RAJA GARDEN 68897 DL4CM9301 29-06-2001 28-06-2016 DINESH KUMAR RAM SINGH 11/4 BHOGAL ROAD NEW DELHI 110000 DIESEL RAJA GARDEN 68898 DL4CM9276 28-06-2001 27-06-2016 SHER SINGH SH FAQIR SINGH 38 D-2 SULTAN PURI DELHI 0 DIESEL RAJA GARDEN 68899 DL4CM8801 06-06-2001 05-06-2016 LAXMI VIRENDER 348, BAPROLA BAPROLA VILLAGE DELHI 110000 DIESEL RAJA GARDEN 68900 DL4CM8768 02-06-2001 01-06-2016 GURMEL SINGH . -
In the Flanker Task
Individual differences in uncertainty tolerance are not associated with cognitive control functions in the flanker task Philipp Alexander Schroeder1,3, David Dignath2, and Markus Janczyk3 1 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen 2 Department of Psychology, University of Freiburg 3 Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION IN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (23 FEB 18) UNCERTAINTY TOLERANCE & COGNTIVE CONTROL 2 Short title Uncertainty tolerance & cognitive control Correspondence Dipl.-Psych. Philipp A. Schroeder Dept. of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen Calwerstr. 14 72076 Tübingen Mail: [email protected] Tel.: +49 7071 29 80815 Fax.: +49 7071 29 5904 Sponsors Work of MJ is supported by the Institutional Strategy of the University of Tübingen (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [German Research Foundation], ZUK 63). Work of DD is supported by a grant within the Priority Program, SPP 1772 (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [German Research Foundation], DI 2126/1-1). Acknowledgments The authors thank Lea Johannsen for help with pseudo-randomization procedure in Exp.2. Word count 4929 words Number of figures 5 Number of tables 1 URL to raw data publication https://osf.io/fmqu8/?view_only=398c1e5b4b4743f7af309a7ffca52660 UNCERTAINTY TOLERANCE & COGNTIVE CONTROL 3 Abstract Cognitive control refers to the ability to make correct decisions concurrent to distracting information, and to adapt to conflicting stimulus configurations, eventually promoting goal-directed behavior. Previous research has linked individual differences in cognitive control to psychopathological conditions such as anxiety. However, a link with uncertainty tolerance (UT) has not been tested so far, although both constructs describe cognitive and behavioral performance in ambiguous situations, thus they share some similarities. -
Evidence from the Eriksen Flanker Task and the Spatial Conflict Task
2007 • volume 3 • no 3 • 389-396 Advances in Cognitive Psychology Conditional accuracy in response interference tasks: Evidence from the Eriksen flanker task and the spatial conflict task John F. Stins1,2, J. C. Tinca Polderman1, Dorret I. Boomsma1, and Eco J. C. de Geus1 1 Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2 Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences,VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Received xx.xx.2007 Accepted xx.xx.2007 Keywords response interference, sequential analysis, accuracy, Simon task, flanker ABSTRACT CAFs revealed that in both tasks congruency and sequential trial effects on accuracy are found only Two well-known response interference tasks are in trials with fast responses (< 600 ms). Sequen- the Eriksen flanker task and the spatial conflict tial trial effects on accuracy were weaker for the task. The tasks are logically equivalent, and com- flanker task than for the spatial conflict task. In parable effects of current and previous stimu- very fast trials (< 400 ms) response activation by lus type (congruent or incongruent) have been distracting flankers led to below-chance perform- shown with regard to reaction time (RT). Here, ance in the flanker task, but response activation we investigated whether interference and se- by incongruent spatial location did not lead to quential trial effects also had comparable effects below-chance performance in the spatial conflict on accuracy. We specifically tested whether these task. The pattern of results hints at subtle dif- effects interacted with the speed of responding ferences in processing architecture between the using conditional accuracy functions (CAFs). The tasks. -
Haloperidol Impairs Learning and Error-Related Negativity in Humans
Haloperidol Impairs Learning and Error-related Negativity in Humans Patrick J. Zirnheld, Christine A. Carroll, Paul D. Kieffaber, Brian F. O’Donnell, Anantha Shekhar, and William P. Hetrick Abstract & Humans are able to monitor their actions for behavioral Performance Task, the Eriksen Flanker Task, and a learning- conflicts and performance errors. Growing evidence suggests dependent Time Estimation Task. Haloperidol significantly that the error-related negativity (ERN) of the event-related attenuated ERN amplitudes recorded during the flanker task, cortical brain potential (ERP) may index the functioning of impaired learning of time intervals, and tended to cause this response monitoring system and that the ERN may de- more errors of commission, compared to placebo, which pend on dopaminergic mechanisms. We examined the role did not significantly differ from diphenhydramine. Drugs of dopamine in ERN and behavioral indices of learning by had no significant effects on the stimulus-locked P1 and N2 administering either 3 mg of the dopamine antagonist (DA) ERPs or on behavioral response latencies, but tended to af- haloperidol (n = 17); 25 mg of diphenhydramine (n = 16), fect post-error reaction time (RT) latencies in opposite ways which has a similar CNS profile but without DA proper- (haloperidol decreased and diphenhydramine increased ties; or placebo (n = 18) in a randomized, double-blind RTs). These findings support the hypothesis that the DA manner to healthy volunteers. Three hours after drug ad- system is involved in learning and the generation of the ministration, participants performed a go/no-go Continuous ERN. & INTRODUCTION subjects need to have learned a representation of the Humans are able to monitor their actions for behavioral goal behavior for this negativity to be observed conflicts and performance errors, and then modify (Holroyd & Coles, 2002; Dehaene et al., 1994). -
Flanker Paradigm Contains Conflict and Distraction Factors with Distinct Neural Mechanisms: an ERP Analysis in a 2-1 Mapping Task
Cognitive Neurodynamics (2019) 13:341–356 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-019-09529-w (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV) RESEARCH ARTICLE Flanker paradigm contains conflict and distraction factors with distinct neural mechanisms: an ERP analysis in a 2-1 mapping task 1 1 1 2 Shu Zhou • Shenglan Xiong • Wenwen Cheng • You Wang Received: 1 March 2018 / Revised: 25 February 2019 / Accepted: 18 March 2019 / Published online: 22 March 2019 Ó Springer Nature B.V. 2019 Abstract Behavioral studies using the flanker 2-1 mapping task suggest that both stimulus and response conflicts contribute to flanker conflict effect. However, both are intertwined with distraction effect. Their underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear. We applied a perceptual flanker 2-1 mapping task to 24 healthy young adults, while the event-related potentials were recorded. The task included stimulus-incongruent (SI), response-incongruent (RI), congruent (CO) and neutral (NE) stimuli. Our reaction time data demonstrated conflict effect, distraction effect and their interaction. Furthermore, the conflict factor successively enhanced the frontal P2 (160–240 ms), the posterior N2pc (200–240 ms), the fronto-central and the right frontal N2b (240–420 ms), and the posterior N2c (320–420 ms). Only the frontal P2 was larger for RI than SI. The distraction factor increased the right N2pc and reduced the left parietal P3b (460–480 ms). Overall, our findings suggested that the flanker conflict involved an early attentional processing of task-relevant and distractive information, and a later processing of conflict evaluation and response inhibition. Keywords Cognitive control Á Flanker conflict Á Distraction Á 2-1 mapping Á Event-related potentials (ERP) Á Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) Introduction task (Simon and Rudell 1967), and Eriksen flanker task (Eriksen and Eriksen 1974). -
Running Head: NEURAL CORRELATES of ATTENTIONAL CONTROL THEORY 1
Running head: NEURAL CORRELATES OF ATTENTIONAL CONTROL THEORY 1 NEURAL CORRELATES OF ATTENTIONAL CONTROL THEORY IN HIGH TRAIT ANXIOUS INDIVIDUALS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF ARTS IN CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY BY RICHARD T. WARD DR. STEPHANIE SIMON-DACK – ADVISOR BALL STATE UNIVERSITY MUNCIE, INDIANA JULY 2017 NEURAL CORRELATES OF ATTENTIONAL CONTROL THEORY 2 Neural Correlates of Attentional Control Theory in High Trait Anxious Individuals Trait anxiety, as defined by Spielberger (1966), involves the experience of excessive worry, nervousness, and apprehension for a prolonged period of time. Individuals displaying maladaptive high levels of trait anxiety have demonstrated a variety of impairments across multiple cognitive domains including working memory. Attentional Control Theory provides an explanation as to how maladaptive high trait anxiety can impact working memory through the impairment of central executive functions (Eysenck & Derakshan, 2011), and a number of behavioral investigations have provided evidence in support of this theory (Eysenck, Paynea, & Derakshan., 2005; Derakshan & Eysenck, 2009; Ansari & Derakshan, 2010; Johnson, 2009; Ansari, Derakshan, & Richards, 2008; Murray & Jannell, 2003). However there is currently a lack in understanding of the underlying neural processes that give rise to Attentional Control Theory’s components. Therefore, the goal of the current study was to investigate the underlying neural correlates of the tenets of Attentional Control Theory. By understanding the neural mechanisms of maladaptive high trait anxiety, we gain a greater knowledge of the underlying processes of trait anxiety, and how it impacts the neural mechanisms involved with central executive functions. Trait Anxiety Spielberger (1966) defined trait anxiety as a personality trait, in which individuals high it are more prone to experience intense feelings of apprehension, tension, and excessive worry for a prolonged duration. -
Sequential Sampling Models of the Flanker Task: Model Comparison and Parameter Validation
Sequential sampling models of the flanker task: Model comparison and parameter validation Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Corey Nathan White, M. A. Graduate Program in Psychology The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Roger Ratcliff, Advisor Gail McKoon Simon Dennis Alex Petrov Copyright Corey Nathan White 2010 Abstract The present study tests sequential sampling models of processing in the flanker task. In a standard flanker task, participants must identify a central target that is flanked by items that indicate the same response (congruent) or the opposite response (incongruent). The standard finding is that incongruent flankers produce interference that primarily affects the early component of the decision process. The goal was to contrast different mechanisms of visual attention and to identify a simple processing model that can be used to augment analyses of this task. Several models were contrasted in their ability to account for flanker data from experiments that manipulated response bias, speed/accuracy tradeoffs, attentional focus, and stimulus configuration. Models that assume dynamic focusing of attention provided the best overall account of the behavioral data. Among the dynamic models, a spotlight model that assumes gradual narrowing of attention provided the best balance of fit and parsimony, though dual process models that assume discrete selection of the target also captured the main trends in the data when only standard congruent and incongruent conditions were used. Importantly, the ii experimental manipulations were reflected by the appropriate model parameters, supporting future use of these models to decompose behavioral data from the flanker task into meaningful psychological constructs. -
List of Eligible Candidates Called for Personal Interview for the Position of Casual Labourers in Lok Sabha Sectt. (Advt. No. 3/2016)
LIST OF ELIGIBLE CANDIDATES CALLED FOR PERSONAL INTERVIEW FOR THE POSITION OF CASUAL LABOURERS IN LOK SABHA SECTT. (ADVT. NO. 3/2016) DATE OF PERSONAL INTERVIEW: 16.02.2017 ROLL NO. NAME ADDRESS DATE OF BIRTH CATGORY 3001. RAHUL KUMAR C-158, SURYA VIHAR PHASE-3, 11.02.1993 OTG THAKUR GALI NO.5, SEHATPUR, FARIDABAD HARYANA - 121013 3002. SHRIMAN MEENA VILL- KATHERA, POST KHERA 04.07.1989 ST KALYANPUR, TEH-KATHUMAR, DISTT-ALWAR, THANA-KHERI, RAJASTHAN-301035 3003. UMA SHANKAR VILL-BHADAURAI, THANAA- 10.05.1996 OTG RAJBHAR BHAWARKOLA, TEHSEL-MUHAMMADABAD, DISTT-UTTARAKHAND. 3004. RAVI KUMAR H-497, TYPE-II, 10.09.1993 OBC KALI BARI MARG, NEW DELHI-110001 3005. KARAN 40-H, GOVT STAFF QUARTER, 12.06.1992 SC ARAM BAGH, NEW DELHI-110055 3006. KRISHNA RZ-3/320 GALI NO. 8, 12.03.1995 SC GEETANJALI PARK WEST SAGAR PUR, NEW DELHI-110046 3007. AJAY S/O SHRI SATAN LAL, 22.08.1991 SC R/O H. NO. 662, T-2, SECTOR-8, R K PURAM, NEW DELHI-110022 3008. RAVI KUMAR R/O E-26, STREET NO.10, 31.03.1995 UR SUBHASH VIHAR NORTH GHONDA DELHI-110053 3009. JATIN KALYAN D-455, TYPE-II, 15.09.1995 SC MANDIR MARG, NEW DELHI-110001 3010. AMAN C-32, DSIDC COMPLEX, 09.11.1996 UR KALYANPURI, DELHI-110091 3011. KHURSHEED ALAM 128, SAINI WALI GALI NO.3, 20.02.1992 OTC RAMPURA DELHI 3012. NANCY WZ-337, HARIJAN COLONY, 01.06.1992 SC TILAK NAGAR, NEW DELHI-110018 3013. OMPRAKASH VILL-MAI TEH-NADBAI, DISTT- 05.05.1994 SC BHARATPUR, RAJASTHAN -321028 3014. -
Why Robust Cognitive Tasks Do Not Produce Reliable Individual Differences
Behav Res DOI 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1 The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences Craig Hedge1 & Georgina Powell1 & Petroc Sumner1 # The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract Individual differences in cognitive paradigms are such reliability estimates into account has the potential to qual- increasingly employed to relate cognition to brain structure, itatively change theoretical conclusions. The implications of chemistry, and function. However, such efforts are often un- our findings are that well-established approaches in experimen- fruitful, even with the most well established tasks. Here we tal psychology and neuropsychology may not directly translate offer an explanation for failures in the application of robust to the study of individual differences in brain structure, chem- cognitive paradigms to the study of individual differences. istry, and function, and alternative metrics may be required. Experimental effects become well established – and thus those – tasks become popular when between-subject variability is Keywords Reliability . Individual differences . Reaction low. However, low between-subject variability causes low re- time . Difference scores . Response control liability for individual differences, destroying replicable corre- lations with other factors and potentially undermining pub- lished conclusions drawn from correlational relationships. Though these statistical issues have a long history in psychol- ogy, they are widely overlooked in cognitive psychology and Individual differences have been an annoyance rather neuroscience today. In three studies, we assessed test-retest than a challenge to the experimenter. His goal is to reliability of seven classic tasks: Eriksen Flanker, Stroop, control behavior, and variation within treatments is stop-signal, go/no-go, Posner cueing, Navon, and Spatial- proof that he has not succeeded… For reasons both Numerical Association of Response Code (SNARC). -
Parsing the Flanker Task to Reveal Behavioral and Oscillatory
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Parsing the Flanker task to reveal behavioral and oscillatory correlates of unattended confict Received: 21 March 2019 Accepted: 10 September 2019 interference Published: xx xx xxxx Marcella Brunetti1,2, Filippo Zappasodi1,2, Pierpaolo Croce1 & Rosalia Di Matteo1 Stimulus-Response confict is generated by an overlap between stimulus and response dimensions, but the intrinsic nature of this interaction is not yet deeply clarifed. In this study, using a modifed Eriksen fanker task, we have investigated how fankers have to be incongruent to target in order to produce an interference and whether and how this interference interacts with the one produced by Stimulus features overlap. To these aims, an Eriksen-like task employing oriented hands\arrows has been designed to distinguish between two types of Stimulus-Response (S-R) interferences: one derived by a short-term association and one based on automatic processes. Stimulus-Stimulus (S-S) confict has been also included in the same factorial design. Behavioral, Event Related Potential (ERP) and oscillatory activity data have been measured. Results revealed distinct S-S and automatic S-R efects on behavioral performance. ERP and Theta band power modulation results suggested an early frontal S-S confict processing followed by a posterior simultaneous S-S and automatic S-R confict processing. These fndings provide evidence that, in presence of diferent conficts, the sequence of stimulus identifcation and response selection could not move forward in a linear serial direction, but it may involve further efort, mirrored in posterior late components and response time prolongation. In the last three decades, several studies have been conducted into the frame of cognitive control to investigate the dynamic of confict monitoring. -
Early Modulation of Sensory Distractor Processing Induced by Late Response Conflict
It’s the Other Way Around! Early Modulation of Sensory Distractor Processing Induced by Late Response Conflict Bernhard Pastötter and Christian Frings Abstract ■ Understanding the neural processes that maintain goal- ization effect in (both evoked and induced) theta power (3–6Hz) directed behavior is a major challenge for the study of attentional that was more pronounced in incompatible than compatible control. Although much of the previous work on the issue has trials. The sensory lateralization effect preceded in time a mid- focused on prefrontal brain areas, little is known about the frontal conflict effect that was indexed by an increase of (induced) contribution of sensory brain processes to the regulation of atten- theta power (6–9 Hz) in incompatible compared with compatible tional control. The present EEG study examined brain oscillatory trials. The findings indicate an early modulation of sensory dis- activities invoked in the processing of response conflict in a later- tractor processing induced by response conflict. Theoretical im- alized Eriksen single-flanker task, in which target letters were plications of the findings, in particular with respect to the theory presented at fixation and single distractor letters were presented of event coding and theories relating to stimulus–response bind- either left or right to the targets. Distractors were response ing [Henson, R. N., Eckstein, D., Waszak, F., Frings, C., & Horner, compatible, response incompatible, or neutral in relation to the A. Stimulus-response bindings in priming. Trends in Cognitive responses associated with the targets. The behavioral results Sciences, 18, 376–384, 2014; Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, showed that responses to targets in incompatible trials were G., & Prinz, W.