DOCSLIB.ORG

APA Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy, Vol. 17, No. 1, Fall 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NEWSLETTER | The American Philosophical Association Feminism and Philosophy FALL 2017 VOLUME 17 | NUMBER 1 FROM THE EDITOR Shay Welch: Existential Eroticism. A Serena Parekh Feminist Approach to Understanding Women’s Oppression-Perpetuating Choices ABOUT THE NEWSLETTER ON Reviewed by Mara Marin FEMINISM AND PHILOSOPHY Mariana Ortega: In-Between: Latina SUBMISSION GUIDELINES Feminist Phenomenology, Multiplicity, and the Self NEWS FROM THE CSW Reviewed by Katrina England MUSINGS Lauren Swayne Barthold: A Hermeneutic Ásta Approach to Gender and Other Social Identities To Do Metaphysics as a Feminist: Reflections on Feminist Methodology in Reviewed by Tina Fernandes Botts Light of the Hypatia Affair Johanna Oksala: Feminist Experiences Reviewed by Chris Jingchao Ma BOOK REVIEWS Erin C. Tarver and Shannon Sullivan: Kelly Oliver: Hunting Girls: Sexual Violence Feminist Interpretations of William James from the Hunger Games to Campus Rape Reviewed by Seth Vannatta Reviewed by Summer Renault-Steele Laurie J. Shrage and Robert Scott Stewart: Diana Tietjens Meyers: Poverty, Agency, Philosophizing About Sex and Human Rights Reviewed by F. Vera-Gray Reviewed by Lynda Lange Cheshire Calhoun: Moral Aims Martha Nussbaum: Anger and Forgiveness: Reviewed by Lisa Tessman Resentment, Generosity, Justice Reviewed by Mechthild Nagel VOLUME 17 | NUMBER 1 FALL 2017 © 2017 BY THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION ISSN 2155-9708 APA NEWSLETTER ON Feminism and Philosophy SERENA PAREKH, EDITOR VOLUME 17 | NUMBER 1 | FALL 2017 FROM THE EDITOR SUBMISSION GUIDELINES AND Serena Parekh INFORMATION NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY 1. Purpose: The purpose of the newsletter is to publish This issue includes a new section entitled “Musings,” which information about the status of women in philosophy and includes a talk recently given by Ásta. It is her reflection to make the resources of feminist philosophy more widely on what’s come to be called the “Hypatia Affair” and available. The newsletter contains discussions of recent seeks to shed light on what the Affair means for feminist developments in feminist philosophy and related work in methodologies going forward. Because the mission of this other disciplines, literature overviews and book reviews, newsletter is to provide a space for thoughtful discussions suggestions for eliminating gender bias in the traditional of issues that are relevant to feminist philosophers, I’ve philosophy curriculum, and reflections on feminist included it in this issue. About the Affair, she writes, “Note pedagogy. It also informs the profession about the work that we are not talking about freedom of speech here. of the APA Committee on the Status of Women. While At issue is not whether an author can argue for offensive articles published are usually around ten pages, we can claims or be insensitive in their argument. At issue is what also publish longer ones. All submissions must follow the academic excellence in feminist philosophy scholarship APA guidelines for gender-neutral language. Please submit consists in.” This is certainly an issue of great importance essays electronically to the editor at [email protected]. to the feminist philosophy community. All manuscripts should be prepared for anonymous review. References should follow The Chicago Manual of Style. In addition, the newsletter contains ten reviews of recent feminist scholarship. The books reviewed here reflect 2. Book Reviews and Reviewers: If you have published the diversity of approaches in contemporary feminist a book that is appropriate for review in the newsletter, scholarship: Anglo-American/analytic, continental please email the editor a flyer of your book and the name philosophy, history of philosophy, and non-Western and contact information of your publisher. We are always philosophy among others. Many thanks to all those who seeking new book reviewers. To volunteer to review books submitted articles, reviewed books, and to those who acted (or some particular book), please send the editor a CV as reviewers of submissions for this issue of the newsletter. and letter of interest, including mention of your areas of Please consider submitting an article for publication in this research and teaching. newsletter and/or volunteering to review a book. 3. Where to Send Things: Please send all articles, comments, suggestions, books, and other communications to the editor: Dr. Serena Parekh, Northeastern University, [email protected]. Please also send any announcement or ABOUT THE NEWSLETTER ON CFPs you would like to include in the newsletter. FEMINISM AND PHILOSOPHY 4. Submission Deadlines: Submissions for spring issues are due by the preceding September 1; submissions for fall The Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy is sponsored issues are due by the preceding February 1. by the APA Committee on the Status of Women (CSW). The newsletter is designed to provide an introduction to recent philosophical work that addresses issues of gender. None of the varied philosophical views presented by authors of newsletter articles necessarily reflect the views of any NEWS FROM THE COMMITTEE or all of the members of the Committee on the Status of Women, including the editor(s) of the newsletter, nor does ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN the committee advocate any particular type of feminist philosophy. We advocate only that serious philosophical COMMITTEE MEMBERS FOR 2017–2018 attention be given to issues of gender and that claims of As of July 1, 2017, the CSW comprises Charlotte Witt (chair), gender bias in philosophy receive full and fair consideration. Peggy DesAutels (ex officio), Serena Parekh (ex officio), APA NEWSLETTER | FEMINISM AND PHILOSOPHY Margaret Atherton, Amy Baehr, Karen Detlefsen, Colleen Murphy, Sheryl Ross, Peter Railton, Michael Rea, Lisa MUSINGS Shapiro, and Yolanda Wilson. To Do Metaphysics as a Feminist: NEW CSW POSTERS We are delighted to announce that two new posters will Reflections on Feminist Methodology in be available for purchase soon on the CSW website. Each Light of the Hypatia Affair is a large photo montage of a different design, but both bear the title “Women of Philosophy.” The designs, by Chad Ásta Robinson, are a must buy for departments and offices. SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY, [email protected] CSW WEBSITE Thank you all for being here today.1 I thought I would give The CSW website, at http://www.apaonlinecsw.org/, a different sort of talk today. I thought I would talk about continues to offer posters featuring contemporary women doing metaphysics of the social world as a feminist. I would in philosophy as well as news about women philosophers. have talked about how most metaphysicians of the social Links to excellent resources include one to a database on world think our job is simply to describe our social world in teaching, with articles and readings; another to the crowd- a value-free way and how most metaphysicians of the social sourced directory of women philosophers; and one to the world focus on social phenomena such as institutions and APA Ombudsperson for Nondiscrimination, who will receive notions such as joint intention, commitment, and attention, complaints of discrimination and, where possible, serve as whereas if you are a feminist like me (or engaged in other a resource to APA members regarding such complaints. liberatory projects), then you might be more interested in the part of the social world that isn’t about the intentional, SITE VISIT PROGRAM or about explicit commitments. The director and associate directors of the program led a day-long Site Visit Training Workshop on Saturday, April 15, But I’m not going to talk about that today. And the reason during the 2017 Pacific Division meeting in Seattle WA. for that is that my views about how to do metaphysics as a feminist are undergoing a radical transformation, and CSW SESSIONS AT APA MEETINGS chiefly because of the Hypatia affair. The Eastern Division session sponsored by CSW was “Women Do History of Philosophy—Recent Scholarship,” A disclaimer is in order here. I’m on the Board of Associate with talks by Agnes Callard, Marta Jimenez, Chris Meyns, Editors of Hypatia.2 But what I say here today are my and Jessica Gordon-Roth. The CSW also co-sponsored (with personal reflections, not that of the board or the journal. the APA Committee on the Status of Black Philosophers) a session on “Women of Color Feminism,” with presentations I’m going to allow myself to be a bit personal here. It is by Naomi Zack, Joy James, Tommy J. Curry, and Celena unusual for me. My talk is entitled “To Do Metaphysics Simpson. as a Feminist.” And I am a metaphysician by training and temperament. My talk could just as well have been At the Central Division meeting, the CSW sponsored called “Confessions of an Analytic Philosopher” because “Celebrating Sandra Lee Bartky,” with talks by Samantha my training was analytic, although I have for a long time Brennan, Tom Digby, Linda Heldke, Jeanine Schroer, considered myself a post-analytic philosopher. and Lynne Tirrell. Their talks are posted at http://www. apaonlinecsw.org. What attracted me to analytic philosophy was the focus on clarity: What precisely is the claim? What is the argument? At the Pacific Division meeting, the CSW sponsored a I had been studying mathematics but was interested in book symposium on Elizabeth Barnes’s The Minority Body, different questions than those mathematicians study. I was with speakers Leslie Pickering Francis, Dana Howard, and frankly more interested in the sorts of questions many in Eva Kittay. The CSW also co-sponsored several sessions: the continental tradition focus on. But my training was, in “Institutional and Attitudinal Barriers,” “Outreach and terms of methods, very analytic. And one of the attractive Issues of Recruitment/Retention,” and “Inclusiveness in and powerful aspects of the practice of analytic philosophy Crisis: How Do We Address Social and Political Flashpoints that I came across in my training is that no claim and no in Philosophy Courses?” argument is too holy to touch, none too offensive.
Recommended publications
  • Feminism and Philosophy

    Feminism and Philosophy

    NEWSLETTER | The American Philosophical Association Feminism and Philosophy FALL 2013 VOLUME 13 | NUMBER 1 FROM THE EDITOR BOOK REVIEWS Margaret A. Crouch Elena Duvergés Blair: Plato’s Dialectic on Woman: Equal, Therefore Inferior Reviewed by Dana Rognlie ABOUT THE NEWSLETTER ON FEMINISM AND PHILOSOPHY Elizabeth Brake: Minimizing Marriage: Marriage, Morality and the Law Reviewed by Vicki Toscano NEWS from THE committee ON THE StatUS OF WOMEN Maurice Hamington and Celia Bardwell- Jones (eds.): Contemporary Feminist Pragmatism ARTICLES Reviewed by Stephanie Rodgers Catherine E. Hundleby Critical Thinking and the Adversary Jane Moore (ed.): Mary Wollstonecraft Paradigm Reviewed by Devora Shapiro Carolyn Korsmeyer Julie Stephens: Confronting Postmaternal Aesthetics: Feminism’s Hidden Impact Thinking Reviewed by Shelley M. Park Ásta Sveinsdóttir Who’s Afraid of Feminist Metaphysics? Alison Stone: Feminism, Psychoanalysis, and Maternal Subjectivity Reviewed by Allison B. Wolf Ewa Plonowska Ziarek: Feminist Aesthetics and the Politics of Modernism Reviewed by Summer Renault-Steele CONTRIBUtorS VOLUME 13 | NUMBER 1 FALL 2013 © 2013 BY THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIatION ISSN 2155-9708 APAAPA NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER | FEMIMINISMNISM ANDAND PHPHIILLOSOPHYOSOPHY controversial suggestion in its thesis, and I suspect the paper itself would be very useful in generating productive Confronting Postmaternal Thinking: conversations in the classroom. Feminism, Memory, and Care In the final section of the book, “Part III: Texts: Novels, Julie Stephens (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011). Literary Reviews, Letters,” Moore offers a collection 208 pages. Paper: $27.50; Cloth: $89.50. ISBN 978-0-231- of papers discussing the literary contributions of 14921-1. Wollstonecraft, providing analyses of her novels with regard to sentimentalism, discussions of Godwin’s influence on her work, and suggestions for political readings of Wollstonecraft’s Reviewed by Shelley M.
  • Mark Schroeder Maschroe@Usc.Edu 3709 Trousdale Parkway Markschroeder.Net

    Mark Schroeder [email protected] 3709 Trousdale Parkway Markschroeder.Net

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ USC School of Philosophy 323.632.8757 (mobile) Mudd Hall of Philosophy Mark Schroeder [email protected] 3709 Trousdale Parkway markschroeder.net Los Angeles, CA 90089-0451 Curriculum Vitae philosophy.academy ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EDUCATION Ph.D., Philosophy, Princeton University, November 2004, supervised by Gideon Rosen M.A., Philosophy, Princeton University, November 2002 B.A., magna cum laude, Philosophy, Mathematics, and Economics, Carleton College, June 2000 EMPLOYMENT University of Southern California, Professor since December 2011 previously Assistant Professor 8/06 – 4/08, Associate Professor with tenure 4/08 – 12/11 University of Maryland at College Park, Instructor 8/04 – 1/05, Assistant Professor 1/05 – 6/06 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ RESEARCH INTERESTS My research has focused primarily on metaethics, practical reason, and related areas, particularly including normative ethics, philosophy of language, epistemology, philosophy of mind, metaphysics, the philosophy of action, agency, and responsibility, and the history of ethics. HONORS AND AWARDS Elected to USC chapter of Phi Kappa Phi, 2020; 2017 Phi Kappa Phi Faculty
  • Critical Inquiry As Virtuous Truth-Telling: Implications of Phronesis and Parrhesia ______

    Critical Inquiry As Virtuous Truth-Telling: Implications of Phronesis and Parrhesia ______

    ______________________________________________________________________________ Critical Inquiry as Virtuous Truth-Telling: Implications of Phronesis and Parrhesia ______________________________________________________________________________ Austin Pickup, Aurora University Abstract This article examines critical inquiry and truth-telling from the perspective of two comple- mentary theoretical frameworks. First, Aristotelian phronesis, or practical wisdom, offers a framework for truth that is oriented toward ethical deliberation while recognizing the contingency of practical application. Second, Foucauldian parrhesia calls for an engaged sense of truth-telling that requires risk from the inquirer while grounding truth in the com- plexity of human discourse. Taken together, phronesis and parrhesia orient inquirers to- ward intentional truth-telling practices that resist simplistic renderings of criticality and overly technical understandings of research. This article argues that truly critical inquiry must spring from the perspectives of phronesis and parrhesia, providing research projects that aim at virtuous truth-telling over technical veracity with the hope of contributing to ethical discourse and social praxis. Keywords: phronesis, praxis, parrhesia, critical inquiry, truth-telling Introduction The theme of this special issue considers the nature of critical inquiry, specifically methodological work that remains committed to explicit goals of social justice and the good. One of the central concerns of this issue is that critical studies have lost much of their meaning due to a proliferation of the term critical in educational scholarship. As noted in the introduction to this issue, much contemporary work in education research that claims to be critical may be so in name only, offering but methodological techniques to engage in critical work; techniques that are incapable of inter- vening in both the epistemological and ontological formations of normative practices in education.
  • To Appear in Synthese Probability and Proximity in Surprise

    To Appear in Synthese Probability and Proximity in Surprise

    Page 1 of 19 To appear in Synthese Probability and Proximity in Surprise Tomoji Shogenji1 Abstract This paper proposes an analysis of surprise formulated in terms of proximity to the truth, to replace the probabilistic account of surprise. It is common to link surprise to the low (prior) probability of the outcome. The idea seems sensible because an outcome with a low probability is unexpected, and an unexpected outcome often surprises us. However, the link between surprise and low probability is known to break down in some cases. There have been some attempts to modify the probabilistic account to deal with these cases, but they are still faced with problems. The new analysis of surprise I propose turns to accuracy (proximity to the truth) and identifies an unexpected degree of inaccuracy as reason for surprise. The shift from probability to proximity allows us to solve puzzles that strain the probabilistic account of surprise. Keywords Qualitative hypothesis ∙ Quantitative hypothesis ∙ Probabilistic hypothesis ∙ Inaccuracy ∙ Scoring rules ∙ Expected inaccuracy 1. Introduction This paper proposes an analysis of surprise formulated in terms of proximity to the truth, to replace the probabilistic account of surprise. It is common to link surprise to the low (prior) probability of the outcome.2 The idea seems sensible because an outcome with a low probability is unexpected, and an unexpected outcome often surprises us. However, the link between surprise and low probability is known to break down in some cases. There have been some attempts to modify the probabilistic account to deal with these cases, but as we shall see, they are still faced with problems.

  • A Philosophy of Rebellion: Anarchism in Literature and Film

    American University in Cairo AUC Knowledge Fountain Theses and Dissertations 6-1-2016 A philosophy of rebellion: Anarchism in literature and film Menna ElDawi Zein Follow this and additional works at: https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds Recommended Citation APA Citation ElDawi Zein, M. (2016).A philosophy of rebellion: Anarchism in literature and film [Master’s thesis, the American University in Cairo]. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/288 MLA Citation ElDawi Zein, Menna. A philosophy of rebellion: Anarchism in literature and film. 2016. American University in Cairo, Master's thesis. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/288 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by AUC Knowledge Fountain. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AUC Knowledge Fountain. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The American University in Cairo School of Humanities and Social Sciences A Philosophy of Rebellion: Anarchism in Literature and Film A Thesis Submitted to The Department of English and Comparative Literature In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Menna El Dawi Zein Under the supervision of Dr. William Melaney May 2016 The American University in Cairo A Philosophy of Rebellion: Anarchism in Literature and Film A Thesis Submitted by Menna El Dawi Zein To the Department of English and Comparative Literature May 2016 In partial fulfillment of the requirements for The degree of Master of Arts Has been approved by Dr. William Melaney Thesis Committee Advisor____________________________________________ Affiliation_________________________________________________________ Dr. Ferial Ghazoul Thesis Committee Reader____________________________________________ Affiliation_________________________________________________________ Dr.
  • Introduction to Ethics

    Introduction to Ethics

    p.1 Introduction to Ethics Place: TBD Time: TBD Instructor: Eric de Araujo Office: TBD Email: [email protected] Office Hours: TBD Texts & Materials An Introduction to Moral Philosophy (2018) by Jonathan Wolff. Readings in Moral Philosophy (2018) by Jonathan Wolff. Readings will come from the above text and anthology. Additional readings might be posted on Carmen. Bring either your textbook or appropriate readings to class. Course Description In this introduction to ethics will think about ethical issues like philosophers. First, we will learn how to reason morally and consider challenges to moral theorizing. Ten we will examine some major ethical theories along with some objections to them.Syllabus Once we understand these, we will discuss some ethical debates on particular topics. Course Goals & Objectives A. You will be able to articulate and evaluate major ethical theoriesAraujo by: Articulating main positions within ethical debates, identifying differences between ethical theories, presenting objections to ethical theories, applying ethical theories to cases, and communicating philosophical views to others. B. You will be able to comprehend and critique others' views by: Identifying the main conclusion ofde others' arguments, identifying the support given for a conclusion, evaluating the arguments of others, representing the logical structure of arguments, and determining what evidence is relevant to a conclusion. CourseC. You will be able to contribute to ethical debates by: Articulating main positions within ethical debates, applying ethical theories to cases, constructing an original argument, identifying the main conclusion of others' arguments,Eric identifying the support given for a conclusion, evaluating the arguments of p.2 others, distinguishing moral and non-moral questions, communicating philosophical views to others, and anticipating and defending views from objections.
  • Feminist Theory: a Philosophical Anthology Ann Cudd (Editor), Robin Andreasen (Editor)

    Feminist Theory: a Philosophical Anthology Ann Cudd (Editor), Robin Andreasen (Editor)

    To purchase this product, please visit https://www.wiley.com/en-gb/9781405116602 Feminist Theory: A Philosophical Anthology Ann Cudd (Editor), Robin Andreasen (Editor) Paperback 978-1-405-11661-9 November 2004 Out of stock £31.25 Hardcover 978-1-405-11660-2 November 2004 Out of stock £103.00 DESCRIPTION Feminist Theory: A Philosophical Anthology addresses seven philosophically significant questions regarding feminism, its central concepts of sex and gender, and the project of centering women’s experience. • • Topics include the nature of sexist oppression, the sex/gender distinction, how gender-based norms influence conceptions of rationality, knowledge, and scientific objectivity, feminist ethics, feminst perspectives on self and autonomy, whether there exist distinct feminine moral perspectives, and what would comprise true liberation. • • Features an introductory overview illustrating the development of feminism as a philosophical movement • • Contains both classic and contemporary sources of feminist thought, including selections by Mary Wollstonecraft, John Stuart Mill, Simone de Beauvior, Kate Millett, bell hooks, Marilyn Frye, Martha Nussbaum, Louise Antony, Sally Haslanger, Helen Longino, Marilyn Friedman, Catharine MacKinnon, and Drucilla Cornell. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Ann E. Cudd is Professor of Philosophy and Director of Women’s Studies at the University of Kansas. She is co-editor of Theorizing Backlash: Philosophical Reflections on the Resistance to Feminism (with Anita Superson, 2002). Robin O. Andreasen is Assistant Professor
  • Phronesis, Artifacts and Leadership Practice

    Phronesis, Artifacts and Leadership Practice

    Phronesis, Artifacts and Leadership Practice Richard Halverson University of Wisconsin - Madison Abstract This paper develops Aristotle’s idea of phronesis, or practical wisdom, as a framework to access, represent and communicate the complexity of successful instructional leadership practice in schools. The design and use of artifacts, the tools leaders develop and implement in their practice, provide a window into the patterns of problem-setting and problem-solving that guide the expression of phronesis in school leadership. Introduction It has long been recognized that where you find good schools, you also often find the legacy of strong leadership. Prior research has defined many of the characteristics of schools with strong instructional programs, such as professional community grounded in instruction among teachers and leaders, a shared sense of instructional vision, group ownership of the instructional process and links between supervisory, assessment and instructional practices. 1 School leaders are responsible for the design and maintenance of these essential conditions in existing school systems.2 However, while we know quite a bit about the characteristics of such school communities, we know quite a bit less about how these characteristics develop together to become distinctive features of the school community. A strong professional community among teachers, for example, can either presuppose or help create group ownership of instructional process, which in turn may Submitted for publication: Please to not cite without the author’s permission 1 2 depend upon or generate the need for stronger internal linkages between assessment and instruction. The implementation and coordination of these conditions is an important aspect of improving student learning in schools.3 Accessing how school leaders understand and manage schools calls for a new approach to understanding the leadership practice.
  • Law and the Metaethics of Discord

    Law and the Metaethics of Discord

    Katja Maria Vogt, katjavogt.com, Columbia University 1 Law and the Metaethics of Discord, NYU Colloquium in Legal, Political, and Social Philosophy, Draft 08-2020 For: Special issue on the Normativity of Law, Ancient Philosophy Today: Dialogoi Law and the Metaethics of Discord Plato’s Euthyphro, I argue, lays out a metaethics that responds to persistent and unresolved value disagreement, and that is a genuine contender for us today. With this proposal, I reject centuries of scholarship, not to speak of countless anthologies and syllabi in ethics and the philosophy of law.1 The Euthyphro begins with three cases of unresolved value disagreement. These cases are to be adjudicated by the law, which turns out to be difficult. Today if an author starts with three examples, we expect that the subsequent text is going to address them. This, I submit, is the structure of the Euthyphro. Against my reading, discussions of the Euthyphro tend to focus almost exclusively on a brief section in which Plato discusses what is now known as the Euthyphro Problem. Socrates asks whether the gods love the pious because it is pious, or whether the pious is pious because it is loved by the gods. In the idiom of contemporary metaethics, the puzzle may seem to be this: is value attitude-independent or is value conferred by attitudes?2 Alternatively, in the idiom of traditional Divine Command Theory, do the gods —or, does God, since Divine Command Theory tends to be monotheistic—recognize value, or is value conferred by divine approval?3 1 Much of the literature on the Euthyphro focuses on two out of fifteen pages of the dialogue, where the so- called Euthyphro Problem is discussed.
  • Care Ethics and Natural Law Theory: Toward an Institutional Political Theory of Caring Author(S): Daniel Engster Source: the Journal of Politics, Vol

    Care Ethics and Natural Law Theory: Toward an Institutional Political Theory of Caring Author(S): Daniel Engster Source: the Journal of Politics, Vol

    Care Ethics and Natural Law Theory: Toward an Institutional Political Theory of Caring Author(s): Daniel Engster Source: The Journal of Politics, Vol. 66, No. 1 (Feb., 2004), pp. 113-135 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of the Southern Political Science Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00144.x Accessed: 12-11-2016 19:50 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Southern Political Science Association, The University of Chicago Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Politics This content downloaded from 128.104.46.196 on Sat, 12 Nov 2016 19:50:57 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Care Ethics and Natural Law Theory: Toward an Institutional Political Theory of Caring Daniel Engster University of Texas at San Antonio Feminist care ethics have generally been considered too particular and situational to provide the basis for an institutional political theory. In recent years, however, a number of feminist authors have demonstrated care ethics’ applicability to general moral and political problems. Yet they have not yet developed an institutionally based caring political theory.
  • The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College of The

    The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College of The

    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts EXISTENTIALIST ROOTS OF FEMINIST ETHICS A Dissertation in Philosophy by Deniz Durmus Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2015 The dissertation of Deniz Durmus was reviewed and approved* by the following: Shannon Sullivan Professor of Philosophy Women's Studies, and African American Studies, Department Head, Dissertation Advisor, Co-Chair Committee Sarah Clark Miller Associate Professor of Philosophy, Associate Director of Rock Ethics Institute, Co-Chair Committee John Christman Professor of Philosophy, Women’s Studies Robert Bernasconi Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Philosophy, African American Studies Christine Clark Evans Professor of French and Francophone Studies, Women’s Studies Amy Allen Liberal Arts Professor of Philosophy, Head of Philosophy Department *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ii ABSTRACT My dissertation “Existentialist Roots of Feminist Ethics” is an account of existentialist feminist ethics written from the perspective of ambiguous nature of interconnectedness of human freedoms. It explores existentialist tenets in feminist ethics and care ethics and reclaims existentialism as a resourceful theory in addressing global ethical issues. My dissertation moves beyond the once prevalent paradigm that feminist ethics should be devoid of any traditional ethical theories and it shows that an existential phenomenological ethics can complement feminist ethics in a productive way. The first chapter, introduces and discusses an existentialist notion of freedom based on Simone de Beauvoir and Jean Paul Sartre’s writings. In order to establish that human beings are metaphysically free, I explain notions of in-itself, for-itself, transcendence, immanence, facticity, and bad faith which are the basic notions of an existentialist notion of freedom.
  • A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry

    A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry

    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Scripps Senior Theses Scripps Student Scholarship 2019 A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry Karina Bucciarelli Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses Part of the Epistemology Commons, Feminist Philosophy Commons, and the Philosophy of Science Commons Recommended Citation Bucciarelli, Karina, "A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry" (2019). Scripps Senior Theses. 1365. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/1365 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Scripps Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scripps Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A FEMINIST EPISTEMOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK: PREVENTING KNOWLEDGE DISTORTIONS IN SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY by KARINA MARTINS BUCCIARELLI SUBMITTED TO SCRIPPS COLLEGE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS PROFESSOR SUSAN CASTAGNETTO PROFESSOR RIMA BASU APRIL 26, 2019 Bucciarelli 2 Acknowledgements First off, I would like to thank my wonderful family for supporting me every step of the way. Mamãe e Papai, obrigada pelo amor e carinho, mil telefonemas, conversas e risadas. Obrigada por não só proporcionar essa educação incrível, mas também me dar um exemplo de como viver. Rafa, thanks for the jokes, the editing help and the spontaneous phone calls. Bela, thank you for the endless time you give to me, for your patience and for your support (even through WhatsApp audios). To my dear friends, thank you for the late study nights, the wild dance parties, the laughs and the endless support.