DOCSLIB.ORG

Handling the Risk Pollution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Handling the Risk Pollution RIWA -GIMPE/GISPE June 20th,l 2006 Handling the risk of drinking water pollution Reaction of RIWA on the “GIMPE- Poster” contributed on the 2nd International Meuse Symposium Meeting RIWA-GIMPE on June 20, 2006 Supply of drinking water in the Netherlands Degreeof connection: 99,9% Number of drinking water companies 250 220 211 197 199 200 132 150 140 110 102 100 68 53 36 50 26 1 2 2 6 13 0 1853 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2005 123 Liter/capita*day Handling the risk of drinking water 2 pollution Risk of drinking water pollution 1 RIWA -GIMPE/GISPE June 20th,l 2006 RIWA-Sections Rhine Meuse Scheldt Vitens cap.: 5 Million Evides cap.: 2,5 Million VMW cap.: 2,5 Million Handling the risk of drinking water 3 pollution Water abstraction NL 22% 60% 18% Groundwater Meuse Rhine Handling the risk of drinking water 4 pollution Risk of drinking water pollution 2 RIWA -GIMPE/GISPE June 20th,l 2006 Handling the risk of drinking water 5 pollution RIWA –Meuse Members • (Brussels) BIMW • (Prov. South-Holland) • (Antwerp) AWW DZH • (Flanders) TMVW • (Prov. Limburg) WML • (Flanders) VMW • (Prov. Brabant) BW • (Europoort) Evides • (Zealand) Evides • (Stockage) WBB Handling the risk of drinking water 6 pollution Risk of drinking water pollution 3 RIWA -GIMPE/GISPE June 20th,l 2006 Three reservoirs with a storage capacity of 5 months Handling the risk of drinking water 7 pollution Present situation • The river-basin Meuse: – River-basin 33,000 km2 – 950 km rain river – prognoses abstractions: stabile – 1.2 million inhabitants along the river dispose untreated sewage water • Meuse-water as source for drinking water: – abstractions 450 million m3 per year – drinking water consumers: > 6 million – industrial complexes in the Delta: 25 % – role of surface water in the future Handling the risk of drinking water 8 pollution Risk of drinking water pollution 4 RIWA -GIMPE/GISPE June 20th,l 2006 Drinking water source for six million people (B, NL) Run-off Meuse 1976 120 m3/sec 2003 125 m3/sec (annual average) RIWA –Meuse : 450 Mln. m3/annum (long term) 14 m3/sec = 5% MQ!! Handling the risk of drinking water 9 pollution Surface Area of the Meuse Basin 26% 22% F 12% B(W) 5% B(FL) 35% D NL Handling the risk of drinking water 10 pollution Risk of drinking water pollution 5 RIWA -GIMPE/GISPE June 20th,l 2006 Population in the Meuse basin 8% 25% F 39% B(W) 5% B(FL) 23% D NL Populationdensity(capita per km2) F 75 B(W) 180 H and Bli(ngFL the r)is k2 o60f drinkingD wa t5er 00 NL 460 11 pollution Waste water sanitation Meuse 100% file recording 2005 15 15 International Meuse Commission 80% 14 2005 22 55 65 60% 89 94 32 40% collection with advanced treatment 66 26 10 Biological treatment 20% collected but no treatment 31 4 19 15 10 No sewarage system 5 4 6 0% F B (W) B (FL) NL D total Handling the risk of drinkingM ewuasete bras in 12 pollution Risk of drinking water pollution 6 RIWA -GIMPE/GISPE June 20th,l 2006 Water discharge of the Meuse Lith 1999-2004 3 Long term mea) n value m /s 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 1.1.99 1.1.00 H1and.1.li01ng the ris1k .o1f. 02drinking w1at.e1r. 03 1.1.04 1.1.0513 pollution EU-Framework Water Directive • Art. 7, sub 3: Member states must protect the surface water in such a manner, that for the production of drinking water required, the purification process is simplified and the extent is reduced. • 75/440/EEC concerning quality required of surface water intended for the abstraction of drinking water: limit 0,1 μg/l • To reach the ‘sound’ situation 2015 = enormous task Handling the risk of drinking water 14 pollution Risk of drinking water pollution 7 RIWA -GIMPE/GISPE June 20th,l 2006 Main tasks of RIWA –Meuse • coordinated promotion towards national governments / other bodies • the function as a source for drinking water higher (priority) on the agenda • influence in policy making – availability of quality measurements – involvement in evaluation of action programs – influence in follow up phases, etc. Handling the risk of drinking water 15 pollution The Meuse River A shared future – How? (re: Poster GIMPE) • Downstream countries have applied such intensive cattle breeding that their aquifer has become unsuitable for the production of drinking water • Downstream countries should not sue for extra demands on common household upstream in order to reach better river water quality • Walloon enterprises should be safeguarded from effects of low water discharge and thus high concentrations of pollution. Handling the risk of drinking water 16 pollution Risk of drinking water pollution 8 RIWA -GIMPE/GISPE June 20th,l 2006 Aquifer has become unsuitable for the production of drinking water • Don't do yourself what you accuses the other • Drinking water companies put strong effort in stopping pollution from agriculture and cattle breeding • EC is not intending to defunct the EC- directive on Nitrate Handling the risk of drinking water 17 pollution No extra demands on common household to reach better river water quality • 75/440/EEC reflects the responsibility of states to warrant quality of river water as a source for drinking water production – Water is an essential necessity of life: drinking water + irrigation water – Dependent on surface water after exhaustion aquifer (drying out) • EU WFD - on top of that – focuses on a sound ecological and chemical condition of the river basin water • Upstream can not withdraw from responsibility of problems downstream (à store effluent from production processes and wait for high river flow to decrease concentrations) Handling the risk of drinking water 18 pollution Risk of drinking water pollution 9 RIWA -GIMPE/GISPE June 20th,l 2006 No extra demands on common household to reach better river water quality - 2 • Drinking water companies invest huge amounts in storage basins, alternative sources en purification techniques in order to safeguard the liable provision of drinking water at all times! • DWC’ies search for (deeper) aquifer and apply for concessions. Much higher cost! • “The polluter pays” – principle versus “Too much is too much”. Handling the risk of drinking water 19 pollution Walloon enterprises should be safeguarded from effects of low water discharge • Low water is the mirror image of High water: In Germany barrages and retention area’s have been furnished in order to store water volumes for gradual discharge during low water and to nourish the aquifer • Water sharing of different river basins meets high technical and financial problems with respect to feasibility and - beyond - are multilateral/political very controversial. European support fails. Handling the risk of drinking water 20 pollution Risk of drinking water pollution 10 RIWA -GIMPE/GISPE June 20th,l 2006 Walloon enterprises should be safeguarded from effects of low water discharge - 2 • Low water discharge is a mutual problem, so also for drinking water enterprises! • DWC’ies face the annual repeating exceeding of the drinking water standards during low water • DWC’ies remain responsible for the adequate supply of liable and tasty drinking water, at all times. Handling the risk of drinking water 21 pollution Thank you Risk of drinking water pollution 11.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Impact Assessment 3002 AP Rotterdam
    Port of Rotterdiim Authority Project Organizai>on Uajiavlakt· 2 PO Box Ô622 Environmental Impact Assessment 3002 AP Rotterdam Th« Netherlands Τ ·31 (0)10 252 1111 F »31 (0)10 252 1100 E inronw20portorrotterdam.com W www.ponofronerdam.com W www maasvlakte2 com Document title Environnnental Impact Assessment for Zoning of Maosvlakte 2 Summary Dote April 5, 2007 Project number 9R7008.B1 Reference 9R7008.B 1 /RO 12/CEL/IBA/Nijm Client Port of Rotterdam Authority Project Organization Maasvlakte 2 Mr R. Paul Director of Project Organization Maasvlakte 2 Projectleader drs. J.J.FM. van Haeren Autfior(s) H.M. Sarink and CF. Elings Environmental Impact Assessment SUMMARY Signature drs. J.J.FM. van Haeren Peer review J.C. Jumelet Projectleader Date/initials April 5, 2007 ^ Signature Mr. R. Paul Released by J.C. Jumelet Director of Project Organisation Maasvlakte 2 Date/initials April 5, 2007 4\ Port of Rotterdam Authority Royal Haskoning Division Spatial Development Project Organization Maosvlakte 2 Barbarossastraat 35 PO. Box 6622 Nijmegen 3002 AP Rotterdam ROYAL HASKONINC PO. Box 151 AUASVIAKTIΛ The Netherlands 6500 AD Nijmegen T-f31 (0)10 252 nil The Netherlands F-f31 (0)10 252 1100 T-f31 (0)24 328 42 84 E [email protected] W www.royalhaskoning.com W v/ww.portofrotterdom.com W www.maasvlakte2.com [a*IIOIUIEIITAll«nnASSESS«EIII SniHrr ΕΚνίΙΟΝΜίΝΤλΙ ΙΜΡΑΠ ASSÎSSMÎIIT Srnnmoiy CONTENTS 1 A NEW MAASVLAKTE 2 WHY DO WE NEED MAASVLAKTE 2 3 REQUIREMENTS AND WISHES FOR MAASVLAKTE 2 4 LAND RECLAMATION PLAN 5 THREE LAYOUT ALTERNATIVES 6 PLAN ALTERNATIVE 7 MOST ENVRIONMENT FRIENDLY ALTERNATIVE 8 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE 9 OVERVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES 10 EFFECTS 11 CONCLUSIONS M 12 WHAT NOW? M ENVIIONMEMTAl IMPAC ASSESSMENT Sunmary ENVIRONMENTAL ΙΜΡΑΠ ASSESSMENT Summery A NEW MAASVLAKTE Maasvlakte 2: history of project A PKB-Plus procedure was originally camed out for the Rotterdam Mainport Development Project This procedure got underway m 1998 with publication of a kick-off memorandum.
    [Show full text]
  • ICE Futures Europe Recognised Gasoil Installations
    www.theice.com ICE Futures Europe Recognised Gasoil Installations Amsterdam Installation Address Area Website Contact Zenith Energy Hornweg 10 Amsterdam www.zenithem.com +31(0) 20 58 63 211 Amsterdam Terminal 1045 AR Amsterdam B.V. The Netherlands Euro Tank Amsterdam Van Riebeeckhavenweg 9 Amsterdam www.vtti.com +31(0) 20 5872 121 B.V. 1041 AD Amsterdam Harbour no. 2016 Harbour no. 2029 Harbour no. 2134 The Netherlands FinCo Terminal Petroleumhavenweg 42 Amsterdam www.fincofuel.com +31(0) 88 0215 110 Amsterdam B.V. 1041 AC The Netherlands Gulf Oil Nederland BV Kanaaldijk Oost 10 Amsterdam www.gulf.nl +31(0) 22 3634 567 1393 Nigtevecht The Netherlands Oiltanking Amsterdam Heining, 100 Amsterdam www.oiltanking.com +31(0) 20 4070 100 B.V. 1047 AH Amsterdam The Netherlands July 2019 www.theice.com NuStar Terminals B.V. Sextanweg 10-12 Amsterdam www.votob.nl +31(0) 70 3378 750 Haven nr 4069 1042 AH Amersterdam The Netherlands Vopak Terminal Westpoortweg 480 Amsterdam www.vopak.com +31(0)10 400 2911 Amsterdam Westpoort Harbour 8702 B.V. 1047 HB Amsterdam The Netherlands Vopak Terminal Petrolumweg 42 Amsterdam www.vopak.com +31(0)10 400 2911 Amsterdam 1041 AC Petroleumhaven B.V. Amsterdam July 2019 www.theice.com Antwerp Installation Address Area Website Contact Oiltanking Stolthaven Scheldelaan 450 Antwerp www.oiltanking.com +32 3 5611 500 Antwerp N.V. Haven 623 B 2040 Antwerpen Belgium Vesta Terminal Antwerp Haven 643 Antwerp www.vestaterminals.com +32 3 5601 839 NV Scheldelaan 470 B 2040 Antwerpen Belgium Vopak Terminal Industrieweg 16 Antwerp www.vopak.com +32 3 5457 300 Eurotank N.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Consequences for Freight Traffic
    Netherlands Customs & Brexit Preparation with or without a deal Consequences for What does Brexit freight traffic mean? Customs formalities for imports, The United Kingdom (UK) left the EU exports and transits on 31 January 2020. The UK is no longer part of the Possible levying of customs duties internal market and customs union, and trade policy measures the UK is a third country. The effects of this will be felt at the Non-tariff trade barriers (such as end of the transitional period, the veterinary and phytosanitary requirements, product requirements, free movement of goods between the and checks on waste streams) UK and countries in the EU ends. Customs supervision Trade policy Weapons and arrangements Ammunition Medicines IPR/counterfeit goods Explosives for civil use Transport of dangerous goods Opium Act Sanctions Strategic Goods Liquid assets Strategic services Vehicle crime Drug precursors Cultural and Heritage goods Precursors for Torture explosives Instruments Economy Security Animal feeds Ozone and F-Gases Crop protection CUSTOMS products Composition of fuels and Veterinary biofuels Flora and fauna Safety Environ- Phytosanitary ment Import and export of Product safety (food safety radioactive and nuclear and consumer products) materials Tax & Duties Cat and dog fur Environmentally hazardous Organic agricultural substances products Import and Waste substance export duties Excise duty IIUU (fish) movements FLEGT Turnover tax on imports and exports and coal tax 3 Ready by 31 December 2020 How is Customs Short of 930 additional FTe preparing itself? Recruited and trained Housing and resources Trade has also to prepare Brexit affects us all Cooperation is vital It is joint responsibility to minimize disruption at the border Preparation needed both in NL with or without a trade deal and the UK EU Border formalities - the Netherlands NO DOCUMENT NO TRANSPORT Participation in the Dutch chain solution (via the Port Community System - Portbase) is made mandatory by all ferry terminals and most shortsea terminals.
    [Show full text]
  • Information and Documentation Centre F9z the Geography of the Netherlands, Utrecht
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 117 000 SO 008 831 TITLE I. D. G. Bulletin 1974. INSTITUTION Information and Documentation Centre f9z the Geography of the Netherlands, Utrecht. PUB DATE 74 NOTE 37p.; For a related document, see SO 008 809; Photographs may reproduce poorly EARS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC-$1.95. Plus Postage DESCRIPTORS *Area Studies; Elementary Secondary Education; . Foreign Countries; Geographic Regions; *Geography Instruction; *Human Geography; Instructional Materials; *Physical Geography; Resource Materials; *Social Studies Units IDENTIFIERS *Netherlands ABSTRACT Supplementing the related document SO 008 809, this bulletin gives recent statistics on and describes current developments in the physical and human geography of the Netherlands. Well illustrated with maps, diagrams, and photographs, this source bdok examines population growth and disributidn, the agricultural' and industrial economy, commerce and transport, physical planning, pilblic transportation and traffic, and current water control projects. Services and activities provided by the Information and Documentation Center for the Geography of theyetgerlands are also described. (DE) 1. *********************************************************************** Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished * materials not available from other sources. ERIC makes every effort *, * to obtain the best copy available. Nevertheless, items of marginal * * reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality * * of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions E4IC makes available * * via the ERIC DOCumOnt Reproduction Service (EDRS). EDRS is not * responsible for they quality of the original document. Reproductions * * supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original. ********************************************************************** U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH EDUCATION / WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO. OUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGIN.
    [Show full text]
  • Plastic Litter in the Rivers Rhine, Meuse and Scheldt
    Plastic litter in the rivers Rhine, Meuse and Scheldt Contribution to plastic waste in the North Sea Final draft 2013 Plastic litter in the rivers Rhine, Meuse and Scheldt Contribution to plastic waste in the North Sea Final draft 2013 M. van der Wal M. van der Meulen E. Roex Y. Wolthuis G. Tweehuijsen D. Vethaak 1205955-006 © Deltares, 2013 Title Plastic litter in the rivers Rhine, Meuse and Scheldt Final draft 2013 Client Project Reference Pages Rijkswaterstaat, Dutch 1205955-006 1205955-006-ZWS-0006 125 PublicWorks Department Keywords Rivers, litter, debris, Scheldt River, Meuse River, Rhine River, plastic litter, Marine Strategy Framework Directive Summary The unique properties and societal benefits of plastics have led to an increased global plastic consumption that results in growing accumulation of end-of-life plastics. Plastics discarded off improperly end up in the environment, both land and water, where they may be transported to the seas and oceans. Rivers are transportation pathways that carry litter into the seas and oceans. The general picture of plastic litter in the Rhine, Meuse and Scheldt rivers is complex partly because many different organizations are involved and data on plastic litter are not collected systematically. An overview has been prepared of available data and data gaps. The data were analysed and used for a preliminary assessment of the contribution by Rhine, Meuse and Scheldt to the plastic waste in the North Sea. Based on the limited data on removal of litter by contractors and collection of litter by volunteers in flood plains, measurements of transported litter indicate that about 15,000 m3 macroplastic litter entered the North Sea yearly in the period 2000 to 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Balancing Rail/Road/Barge Hinterland Transportation
    Title Port of Rotterdam Global Hub & Industrial Cluster in Europe Expertgroup Euro-Asian Transport Linkages Sarah Olierook European & International Affairs, Port of Rotterdam Authority © Copyright - Port of Rotterdam 1 Image & Undertitle © Copyright - Port of Rotterdam 2 Text & Objects Port of Rotterdam: Global Hub & Industrial Cluster • Total port area 12,500 hectares = 17.500 UEFA soccer pitches (land & water); • Throughput approx. 442 million tons in 2013 of which 12 mio containers (TEU); • PoR is larger than numbers 2, 3 and 4 in Europe together; • Direct gross added value € 13 billion (2.1% NL GDP) • 33.000 Sea-going vessels and 100.000 inland vessels • Total employment 140,000 people (90,000 direct and 50,000 indirect) Port of Rotterdam © Copyright - Port of Rotterdam 3 Text & Image 30/60 1.600 km 480+ mln population European Market 1.300 km 350 mln population • EU: 500+ mio consumers Inland shipping 950 km 220 mln population Road Rail 500 km • 65% hinterland, 35% Pipelines 160 mln population transhipment Maritime shipping Rotterdam • 35% inland waterway transport • 11% rail • 54% road © Copyright - Port of Rotterdam 4 Text & Image 30/60 Trends and developments • Growth in volume and terminal capacity (Port Compass 2030 – 475 to 750 mio tons in 2030) • Increased cooperation/ alliances and integration of services • Incentives for sustainable transport and more strict emission standards Modal Shift © Copyright - Port of Rotterdam 5 Object & Undertitle Modal Shift Maasvlakte Rotterdam (GE scenario) 2012 2035 Total 4.8 m TEU Total 17
    [Show full text]
  • Leggerdocument Dijkringverbindende Waterkeringen Zuid-Holland
    LEGGERDOCUMENT DIJKRINGVERBINDENDE WATERKERING STORMVLOEDKERINGNIEUWE WATERWEG/EUROPOORT Inhoud 1 Inleiding __________________________________________________________________ 3 1.1 Aanleiding ______________________________________________________________ 3 1.2 Leeswijzer ______________________________________________________________ 3 2 Werkwijze __________________________________________________________________ 4 2.1 Kern- en (buiten)beschermingszone ________________________________________ 4 2.2 Leggerdwarsprofielen ____________________________________________________ 5 2.3 Leggerlengteprofielen ____________________________________________________ 6 3 Kering 8, Stormvloedkering Nieuwe Waterweg / Europoort _____________________________ 7 3.1 Beschrijving kering_______________________________________________________ 7 3.2 Aanwezige constructieve elementen ________________________________________ 8 3.3 Kern- en (Buiten)Beschermingszone ________________________________________ 8 3.4 Leggerdwars- en lengteprofielen __________________________________________ 10 4 Literatuur ___________________________________________________________________ 10 Kenmerk 073916515:B 2 LEGGERDOCUMENT DIJKRINGVERBINDENDE WATERKERING STORMVLOEDKERINGNIEUWE WATERWEG/EUROPOORT HOOFDSTUK 1 Inleiding 1.1 AANLEIDING Binnen het beheersgebied van Rijkswaterstaat dienst Zuid-Holland worden verschillende dijkringverbindende waterkeringen (DVK) onderscheiden. Het betreffen de volgende primaire waterkeringen van de categorie B: Kering 8: Stormvloedkering Nieuwe Waterweg
    [Show full text]
  • OP ZOEK NAAR ZEEBAARS! Het Duurt Niet Lang Voordat De Plug, Maar Helaas Zonder Zeebaars Nummer Één Zich Zich Te Haken – Staat Ook Joran Aandient
    De zeebaars is een bijzonder Check DE video OP www.hETVISBLAD.NL tot de verbeelding sprekende sportvis. (foto: Janny Bosman) rollende stenen en krakende voor het topoog plaatsvinden. oesters onder je schoenen. Let In het heldere water kun maar eens op hoe schichtig je de zeebaars vaak in volle voorbij zwemmende harders vaart op je plug zien klappen, op je aanwezigheid reageren. mits je ervoor zorgt dat je een Ook de zeebaars patrouilleert Polaroid zonnebril op hebt. En in de oeverzone. Direct bij geloof me, dat spektakel wil je aankomst tot je knieën het wa- niet missen! Na een paar felle ter in stampen, vergroot dus runs die de slip doen ratelen de kans dat vriend labrax de – zeebaars gaat er na de aan- vinnen neemt. Beter houd je beet vaak direct als een speer dus een beetje afstand van de in tegenovergestelde richting waterlijn en zorg je dat alleen vandoor – kan ik een fraaie de hengeltop boven het water gestekelde rover van rond de uitsteekt. Het zou zonde zijn 50 cm landen. als een zeebaars die achter je kunstaas aan zit last-minute MOMENTOPNAMES afhaakt omdat ie jou daar ziet Dat zeebaarzen vaak om staan. Om dezelfde reden momentopnames draait, blijkt staan Joran en ik ook niet pal in het half uurtje dat volgt naast elkaar, maar houden we (als er een mooie stroomnaad zo’n kleine 50 meter tussen- vlak voor de kant loopt). Want ruimte aan. nadat ik eerst nog een misser heb – vlak voor mijn neus SNEL ACTIE hapt een dikke zeebaars naar OP ZOEK NAAR ZEEBAARS! Het duurt niet lang voordat de plug, maar helaas zonder zeebaars nummer één zich zich te haken – staat ook Joran aandient.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 1 Title Conflicts About the Extension of the Rhine Economy the Case Of
    1 Title Conflicts about the Extension of the Rhine Economy The case of the port expansion by Maasvlakte II (1969-2008). Name and affiliation Dirk Koppenol, PhD-student at the Erasmus School of History Culture and Communication. Abstract The port land reclamation project - Maasvlakte II of the Port of Rotterdam - is probably, the most literal extension of the Economic Rhine Region, enhancing it in size and length. In the 1970s and the 1990s, attempts was made by Rotterdam to construct this port expansion. Whereas, in the 1970s the proposal for Maasvlakte II was rejected because of popular resistance, in the 1990s all former opponents began to support Maasvlakte II resulting in its 2008 construction. The reason behind this disparity is the subject of this paper. Firstly, it is concluded that, in contrast to the 1970s, broad support was cultivated as opponents and supporters were part of the same discourse coalition, which supported economic development parallel to the creation of new nature reserve. Within this context resistance and delays were instrumental in fostering a dialogue and reducing conflicts. Finally, within this context it is concluded that plans for port expansions are only effective if they are in line with national policy or the dominant discourse coalition. Keywords Port development; port expansion; government; pressure groups; discourse coalition; megaproject Corresponding author Dirk Koppenol, Erasmus School of History Culture and Communication, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam P.O. Box 1738, NL-3000 DR, NL. Email: [email protected] 1 2 1 Introduction In the 1990s, Rotterdam, the largest port in the world, tried to profit from the growing flow of containers from Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strategic Value of the Port of Rotterdam for the International Competitiveness of the Netherlands: a FIRST EXPLORATION
    The strategic value of the Port of Rotterdam for the international competitiveness of the Netherlands: A FIRST EXPLORATION Prof. dr Frans A.J. Van Den Bosch Rick Hollen MScBA Prof. dr Henk W. Volberda Dr Marc G. Baaij RESEARCH INSTITUTE Rotterdam School of Management (RSM), Erasmus University Rotterdam INSCOPE: Research for Innovation ISBN: 978-90-817220-2-5 Rotterdam, May 2011 AUTHORS Prof. dr Frans A.J. Van Den Bosch Rick Hollen MScBA Prof. dr Henk W. Volberda Dr Marc G. Baaij RESEARCH ASSISTANTS Leon De Wilt MScBA, Pim Van Calsteren MScBA, Rianne Van Nieuwland & George Ankomah All rights reserved, 2011. No part of this publica- tion may be reproduced unless this publication is properly cited as the source. - i - TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ..................................................................................................................................................................................... i Executive summary ................................................................................................................................................................. ii 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Problem definition ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 3 Determining the strategic value of the Port of Rotterdam for the Netherlands .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Port Information Guide
    PORT INFORMATION GUIDE Port of Rotterdam January 2021 Port Information Guide - Rotterdam Port Authority Legal disclaimer Port Information Guide - Rotterdam Port Authority Port of Rotterdam makes every effort to make and maintain the contents of this document as up-to-date, accessible, error-free and complete as possible, but the correctness and completeness of these contents cannot be guaranteed. Port of Rotterdam accepts no liability whatsoever for the occurrence and/or consequences of errors, faults or incompleteness or any other omission in connection with the information provided by this document. In case of any discrepancies or inconsistencies between this document and the applicable legislation, including the port bye-laws, the latter will prevail. Changes Version Rev. Date Change Remarks Public holidays updates, page 2021.1 1 2021-01-04 None 4,5 Cancellation of pilot service, 2021.2 2 2021-01-05 None page 20 2021.3 3 2021-01-27 Websites for weather and tide None AVANTI – January 27, 2021 2 Port Information Guide - Rotterdam Port Authority PORT GENERAL INFORMATION General information The port provides facilities for cargo handling, storage, and distribution. The port area also accommodates an extensive industrial complex. Most major carriers include Rotterdam in their services. From this strategically located port, the containers destined for other European countries are then forwarded by feeder services, inland vessels, railway or trucks. The size of the port’s industrial area and its position at the gateway of the European inland waterway network makes the port of Rotterdam ideally located for the transshipment of cargo. The port of Rotterdam is well equipped for handling bulk and general cargoes, coal and ores, crude oil, agricultural products, chemicals, containers, cars, fruit, and refrigerated cargoes.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations on Technical Requirements for Inland Navigation Vessels
    TRANS/SC.3/104/Add.2 ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Geneva INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE Principal Working Party on Inland Water Transport Recommendations on Technical Requirements for Inland Navigation Vessels Addendum 2 UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 1997 TRANS/SC.3/104/Add.2 page 3 AMENDMENTS TO RESOLUTION NO. 17, REVISED: RECOMMENDATIONS ON TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR INLAND NAVIGATION VESSELS 1/ Resolution No. 32 (adopted by the Principal Working Party on Inland Water Transport on 12 November 1992) The Principal Working Party on Inland Water Transport, Considering resolution No. 17, revised (TRANS/SC.3/103, annex 1), containing in its annex the Recommendations on Technical Requirements for Inland Navigation Vessels (TRANS/SC.3/104), Bearing in mind the report of the Working Party on the Standardization of Technical and Safety Requirements in Inland Navigation on its fourth session (TRANS/SC.3/WP.3/8), Decides to amend the Recommendations on Technical Requirements for Inland Navigation Vessels by the text contained in the annex to this resolution, Requests Governments and river commissions to inform the Executive Secretary of the Economic Commission for Europe whether they accept this resolution, Requests the Executive Secretary of the Economic Commission for Europe to place the question of the application of this resolution periodically on the agenda of the Principal Working Party on Inland Water Transport. / The text of this resolution also appears in the compendium of all valid resolutions of the Principal Working Party on Inland Water Transport published in 1993 under the symbol TRANS/SC.3/131. TRANS/SC.3/104/Add.2 page 4 Annex CHAPTER 11 BIS HOISTING DEVICES OF WHEELHOUSES OF INLAND NAVIGATION VESSELS 11 bis-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 11 bis-1.1 A vertically movable wheelhouse shall permit efficient steering of the inland navigation vessel.
    [Show full text]