Sarah Weiger Dissertation Reformatted
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE BIRD IS THE FEELING: ROMANTIC NATURAL HISTORY AND ITS SUBJECTS A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Sarah Nike Weiger August 2011 © 2011 Sarah Nike Weiger THE BIRD IS THE FEELING: ROMANTIC NATURAL HISTORY AND ITS SUBJECTS Sarah Nike Weiger, Ph. D. Cornell University 2011 “The Bird is the Feeling: Romantic Natural History and its Subjects” argues that Romantic natural history writers and the nonhuman objects of their work are mutually constitutive subjects. Unlike eighteenth and later nineteenth-century forms of natural history that consider the natural world as a set of discrete objects and species available for collection and cataloguing, the texts considered in this dissertation are primarily concerned with unexpected encounters and fleeting natural phenomena. The writers addressed express these unrepeatable encounters as a form of natural history that does the work of designating significant subjects and articulating their presence within distinct, subjectively constituted and construed environments. In reading the “natural history” journals, letters, and poems of Dorothy and William Wordsworth, John Clare, and Henry David Thoreau, this dissertation frames the Romantic turn to nature not as a turn away from sociality and history but towards alternative forms of both. Intervening in a number of established strands of Romantic literary criticism and ecocriticism that read the Romantic speaking subject’s treatment of the natural world as primarily an instrument of ego-formation, “The Bird is the Feeling” celebrates the largely private, idiosyncratic efforts of Romantic authors to consider nature, history, and subjectivity in both human and nonhuman terms. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Sarah Weiger has a Bachelor of Arts in English Literature from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Her academic interests include ecocriticism, post-humanism, and transatlantic nineteenth-century literature. iii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my earliest and very dearest mentor, Faye Amo, who provided my first bed and accompanied me all the way here. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My academic career has known too much good fortune to detail it completely in this space. Nevertheless, I want to thank especially the committee members who have assisted me throughout my time at Cornell with great wisdom, patience, and humor: Reeve Parker, whose extraordinary powers of perception and judgment continue to amaze me; Anne-Lise Francois, for her inspiration and example; Debra Fried for being a wonderful and provocative interlocutor; Laura Brown for her acute and invaluable professional advice; and Rick Bogel for his responsiveness and careful reading of my work. I thank my first long-project advisor, Sara Blair, for introducing me to academic writing and engagement so positively at the University of Michigan and for continuing to cheer me on. I am also fortunate to have many friends and classmates whose advice and encouragement has sustained me. They include Colin Dewey, Sarah Ensor, and Judy Park. Finally, I thank my dearest and most constant significant others (human and nonhuman): Julie Joosten, Anthony Stark, and Kawa. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Biographical Sketch.......................................................................................................iii Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................... iv Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: “A love for things that have no feeling:” Dorothy Wordsworth’s Significant Others................................................................. 23 Chapter 2: The Influence of Natural Objects: Wordsworth and the Poetry of Nature.............................................................................. 65 Chapter 3: Shadows of Taste: John Clare’s Tasteful Natural History.......................................................................................... 112 Chapter 4: Natural History in a New Sense................................................................. 148 vi INTRODUCTION The “New” Nature Writing In 2008 the literary magazine Granta published an issue of commissioned articles on what it called “The New Nature Writing.” In his opening letter to the issue, editor Jason Cowley described what the publishers were looking for: [W]e were interested less in what might be called old nature writing—by which I mean the lyrical pastoral tradition of the romantic wanderer—than in writers who approached their subject in heterodox and experimental ways. We also wanted the contributions to be voice-driven, narratives told in the first person, for the writer to be present in the story, if sometimes only bashfully. The best new nature writing is also an experiment in forms: the field report, the essay, the memoir, the travelogue. If travel writing can often seem like a debased and exhausted genre, nature writing is its opposite: something urgent, vital and alert to the defining particulars of our times.1 For Cowley, the defining particulars of our time are, to a great extent, determined by our existence in a kind of ecological end-times: “We know how our world is changing and what is being lost and yet we are powerless to prevent the change.” As such, many of the pieces collected in the issue can be read as elegies, and Cowley’s new nature writing is prospectively nostalgic: innovative in its forms and immediate in its perceptions, but wistful in its themes. Though compelling, Cowley’s description of the new nature writing as heterodox, experimental, urgent and “alert to the defining particulars” of the times makes it sound less like “new” nature writing than it does like an old form of nature writing—not the “lyrical pastoral tradition of the romantic wanderer” Cowley imagines, perhaps, but rather romantic natural history writing (a new tradition of its own). Romantic natural history writing—characterized by its heterodoxy, its 1 Jason Cowley, “Editor’s Letter,” Granta 102: The New Nature Writing, Summer, 2008, unpaginated, <http://www.granta.com/Magazine/102/Editors-Letter>. 1 necessary experimentalism, its attendance to particulars, and its first-person (sometimes bashful) narrators—was also responsive to a world that seemed to be both radically expanding and slipping away, and to an experience of time as both unimaginably extensive and finite. For the old nature writing as for the new, the only possible approach to this world is one that emphasizes the subjective, the particular, the momentary. As Cowley puts it (in terms that once again echo romantic evocations of nature as much as they do contemporary ones), this writing is “about the discovery of exoticism in the familiar, the extraordinary in the ordinary. [It is] about new ways of seeing.” This dissertation reads new ways of seeing and describing in the journals, letters and poems of Dorothy and William Wordsworth, John Clare, and Henry David Thoreau. Beyond simply observing and describing features of natural objects, these “natural histories” record the meetings of mutually constitutive subjects, through which the unique forms of subjectivity available to natural phenomena inform and are informed by those available to the romantic poet, diarist, and naturalist. In this introduction, I present a brief sketch of natural history writing in the late eighteenth century before describing the preoccupation of romantic naturalists with unexpected encounters and fleeting natural phenomena. The writers I address in this dissertation express these unrepeatable encounters, I argue, as a form of natural history that does the work of designating significant subjects and articulating their presence within distinct, subjectively constituted and construed environments. This introduction also implicitly tracks the evolution of the dissertation project, which moved from an interest in the practice of natural history to an exploration of the ways it encouraged resonant and distinct forms of attention to and engagement with natural phenomena during the romantic period. Each chapter investigates the particular legacy of these forms of attention and engagement in a different author. 2 Natural History Notes The title of Ashton Nichols’ anthology Romantic Natural Histories is instructive in two ways: it periodizes natural history and, in its plural form, it suggests that natural history is not a simply categorized, or single, art (or science).2 Characterized by a resistance to systemization and a sharply particularized, yet deeply contextualized, form of engagement with the material world, romantic natural history writing is distinguished by its multifariousness: sometimes private, sometimes public, sometimes amateur, sometimes professional, it participates in a number of different literary genres, often in the space of a single text. Common to natural history writing is a lively and diverse form of viewing, thinking, and writing about the local, like that inaugurated by Gilbert White, whose Natural History of Selborne has shaped the approach of countless writer-naturalists in England and America since its publication. White’s letters, written over the course of fourteen years, developed natural history as a material literary practice. At the heart of this practice is a commitment to authentic engagement with and faithful description of the natural world, with