The Shah, the Islamic Revolution and the United States Darioush Bayandor the Shah, the Islamic Revolution and the United States Darioush Bayandor Nyon, Switzerland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Shah, the Islamic Revolution and the United States Darioush Bayandor the Shah, the Islamic Revolution and the United States Darioush Bayandor Nyon, Switzerland The Shah, the Islamic Revolution and the United States Darioush Bayandor The Shah, the Islamic Revolution and the United States Darioush Bayandor Nyon, Switzerland ISBN 978-3-319-96118-7 ISBN 978-3-319-96119-4 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96119-4 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018952482 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Cover credit: soberve / DigitalVision Vectors / Getty Images Cover design by Tjaša Krivec This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland To Iranian youth; the bright, vibrant and connected generation born after the Revolution. AUTHOR’S PREFACE This book offers a retrospective view of an event of rare historical impor- tance and influence. Beyond having durably transformed Iranian society, the Islamic Revolution of 1979 changed the political landscape of the Middle East with far-flung reverberations that continue to resonate strongly in world politics. The passage of four decades provides enough perspective for a reexami- nation of all the factors, in their complex diversity, which went into the making of that seminal event. The narrative is set against the backdrop of the socio-economic transformations attempted by a modernizing autoc- racy in the face of a cultural backlash. It portrays the pre-revolution setting in Iran of the 1970s and describes how, through a combination of sys- temic flaws, cultural dichotomy and far-flung external developments—the post-Vietnam zeitgeist and perceptions surrounding the advent of the Carter administration in the USA—the country was inflamed and an ailing ruler lost control. Monarchy had haltingly spanned Iran’s millennial history yet its fall, in February 1979, would have been an unremarkable feature of the post-war Middle East had it not been for two inter-related characteristics. Firstly, like the French and the Russian Revolutions before it, the Islamic Revolution came with an ideology and doctrine. Its drift and glow over- rode national boundaries and engulfed the region in incessant conflicts and conflagration. Secondly, contrary to common perceptions, the move- ment led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini was not a struggle against one single regime or an incumbent dynasty even if his enmity toward the two Pahlavi monarchs was deeply entrenched. The doctrine he upheld aimed vii viii AUTHOR’S PREFACE at ending profane rule over the Islamic nation and to restore the dynasty of the Prophet’s progeny, who had briefly ruled in early years of Islam and then was decisively suppressed in the battle of Karbala in 679 CE. The book is also concerned with external factors even if the make-up of the Revolution was uniquely indigenous. The history of that seminal event cannot be fully grasped divorced from the influences that crept in from the major power poles abroad or, alternatively, from deliberate manipulations by a faction in the Carter administration. Several chapters of the narrative are devoted to the study of this latter aspect, sourced by recent finds in the hitherto untapped American archive files. It is my hope that this will help to answer a longstanding question discussed among Iran observers, given the lingering conspiracy theories and still rampant speculations about for- eign involvement. Finally, the issue of the inevitability of the Revolution is a topic that the book aims to address. A Harvard historian of revolutions, Clarence Crane Briton, once wrote—and Zbigniew Brzezinski quoted him in his memoirs: “Revolutions were inevitable only after they had happened.”1 Ill-judged policy decisions and missteps along the road, which sparked the revolt, are inherently avoidable, as this study demonstrates. Most emanated from systemic flaws, yet the more consequential ones came from tempestuous calls by the man at the helm, Mohammad-Reza Shah Pahlavi. Ill health may have compounded bad judgment and indecision. Yet the Shah was also the leader who refused to plunge the nation into civil war in order to save his throne. Some chapters in this volume shed light on this facet of the conundrum. One final point needs to be underscored. The topic stirs, even today, a great deal of passion among Iranians of different political persuasions. However, this book purports to be apolitical and non-judgmental. In describ- ing protagonists on either side of the divide I have remained within the strict confines of hard evidence and archives; the task of historian is to produce data and lay out facts but avoid conclusions, which so often hinge on subjec- tivity. No one is condemned or vindicated in the pages that follow. I am grateful to Palgrave for the opportunity that the publication of this book has afforded me to share what I consider a factual account and expla- nation of that seminal event. I have been fortunate to have worked with leading professionals at the history department of Palgrave New York as well as its peripheral divisions. My thanks go especially to Megan Laddusaw and Christine Pardue. In my research for this volume, I was privileged to be granted access by the Graduate Institute of International and Development AUTHOR’S PREFACE ix Studies, Geneva, to their vast digital network of academic material as well as the magnificent library. A freelance editor, Susan Kaufman, helped me with the Chicago formatting of my manuscript. My old friend and aca- demic companion, Bijan Dolatabadi, read several chapters of the manu- script and offered his insightful observations. So did another old friend, Iraj Amini, himself author of several valuable publications. Foremost, I wish to record my gratitude to Ambassador John Limbert and Professor Michael Axworthy, both renowned Iran experts, for taking time to read and comment on this volume. Nyon, Switzerland Darioush Bayandor April 2018 NOTE 1. Zbigniew Brzezinski, Power and Principle: Memoirs of National Security Advisor (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1983), p. 355 [History Professor Crane Brinton was the author of classic book Anatomy of Revolution (W.W. Norton, New York, 1938)]. CONTENTS Part I The Pre-revolution Setting 1 1 A Retrospective 3 1 Social Forces and Political Dynamics in Modern Iran 3 2 Events and Protagonists in Post-war Iran 5 3 Socio-cultural Mutations in the 1960s 14 2 Nezam Shahanshahi: The Shah’s Imperial Order 27 1 An Autocracy in Disguise 27 2 The Two Faces of a Monarch 29 3 The Inner Circle 31 4 Oil Diplomacy (1963–1973) 34 5 An Economic Powerhouse 40 6 The Shah’s Great Army 47 7 A Regional Superpower 55 8 Iraq, the Kurds and the Settlement of the Shatt al-Arab Dispute 63 9 Nuclear Ambitions and Ambiguities 69 xi xii CONTENTS Part II The Onset of Revolution 89 3 Downslide 91 1 A Man in a Hurry 91 2 The Cycle of Boom and Bust 94 3 The Court’s Vanity Fair 98 4 The Opposition 109 1 Ayatollah Khomeini: The Years of Exile 109 2 Rebellious Youth 117 5 Changing Tack (1976–1977) 129 1 Images in the Curved Mirror 129 2 Liberalization and the Myth of Carter Ambiguity 133 3 Mutual Policy Readjustments 137 Part III The Revolution 143 6 1977: The Year of all Dangers 145 1 Tehran on the Eve of the Revolution 145 2 Sounding out Democracy 147 3 The Opposition Curve: From Civil Society to Radical Islam 150 4 The Shah’s Visit to the Carter White House (November 1977) 155 7 The Spark (Spring 1978) 161 1 Iran: Island of Stability 161 2 The Shah’s “Original Sin”: The “Rashidi–Motalq” Affair 163 3 Backlash in Tabriz 167 4 A Spring Not Like Others 169 8 Actors, Strategies and Structures 177 1 Mehdi Bazargan and His Game Plan 177 2 Kazem Shariatmadari: the Two Faces of a Quiescent Divine 180 3 The Shah Facing the Crisis 182 4 The Mosque Network 186 CONTENTS xiii 9 The Abadan File 195 1 The Event 195 2 The Cabal 199 3 The Enigma of an Appointment 202 10 Appeasement and Recoil 207 1 The Government of National Reconciliation (27 August–5 November 1978) 207 2 The Great September Confluence 210 3 Black Friday 210 11 October Countdown 225 1 The Ayatollah in Paris 225 2 Giscard d’Estaing’s Dilemma 230 3 Political Deadlock 233 4 Season of Strikes (Fall 1978) 238 5 Public Opinion Swing 242 12 November Countdown 251 1 Tehran: Tales of a Wasteland 251 2 Tug of War in Washington 253 3 The Soft Fist Option 259 4 The Voice of the Revolution Heard 261 5 The Perfect Scapegoat 263 13 The Military Spell: Prime Minister Gholam-Reza Azhari 271 1 Induction and Gains 271 2 Entanglement and Retreat 274 3 The Muharram Plebiscite 277 4 The Politics of Despair 282 14 Carter’s Quandary 293 1 The Carter Administration: A House Divided 293 2 Consultations Among Allies 300 3 Washington Dumps the Shah 303 4 The Guadeloupe Summit 310 xiv CONTENTS 15 The USSR and the Iranian Revolution 317 1 Expedience Vs.
Recommended publications
  • Download File (Pdf; 3Mb)
    Volume 15 - Number 2 February – March 2019 £4 TTHISHIS ISSUEISSUE: IIRANIANRANIAN CINEMACINEMA ● IIndianndian camera,camera, IranianIranian heartheart ● TThehe lliteraryiterary aandnd dramaticdramatic rootsroots ofof thethe IranianIranian NewNew WaveWave ● DDystopicystopic TTehranehran inin ‘Film‘Film Farsi’Farsi’ popularpopular ccinemainema ● PParvizarviz SSayyad:ayyad: socio-politicalsocio-political commentatorcommentator dresseddressed asas villagevillage foolfool ● TThehe nnoiroir worldworld ooff MMasudasud KKimiaiimiai ● TThehe rresurgenceesurgence ofof IranianIranian ‘Sacred‘Sacred Defence’Defence’ CinemaCinema ● AAsgharsghar Farhadi’sFarhadi’s ccinemainema ● NNewew diasporicdiasporic visionsvisions ofof IranIran ● PPLUSLUS RReviewseviews andand eventsevents inin LondonLondon Volume 15 - Number 2 February – March 2019 £4 TTHISHIS IISSUESSUE: IIRANIANRANIAN CCINEMAINEMA ● IIndianndian ccamera,amera, IIranianranian heartheart ● TThehe lliteraryiterary aandnd ddramaticramatic rootsroots ooff thethe IIranianranian NNewew WWaveave ● DDystopicystopic TTehranehran iinn ‘Film-Farsi’‘Film-Farsi’ ppopularopular ccinemainema ● PParvizarviz SSayyad:ayyad: ssocio-politicalocio-political commentatorcommentator dresseddressed aass vvillageillage ffoolool ● TThehe nnoiroir wworldorld ooff MMasudasud KKimiaiimiai ● TThehe rresurgenceesurgence ooff IIranianranian ‘Sacred‘Sacred DDefence’efence’ CinemaCinema ● AAsgharsghar FFarhadi’sarhadi’s ccinemainema ● NNewew ddiasporiciasporic visionsvisions ooff IIranran ● PPLUSLUS RReviewseviews aandnd eeventsvents
    [Show full text]
  • Iran, 1919-1930 My Vision by Reza Pahlavi Modern Education in Iran
    Texto compl eto online UNICAMP Palavra-chave: Pahlavi dynasty Ent. princ. Costa, Helder Santos Título Da Pérsia moderna ao Irâo Pahlavi / Helder Santos Costa. Lisboa (Portugal): Universidade Tecnica de Lisboa, Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais Imprenta e Políticas, 2005. The Pahlavi Period H. E. Chehabi Iranian Studies Vol. 31, No. 3/4, A Review of the "Encyclopaedia Iranica" (Summer - Autumn, 1998), pp. 495-502 Published by: International Society for Iranian Studies Article Stable URL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/4311184 From Qajar to Pahlavi: Iran, 1919-1930 Choice Reviews Online, ISSN 0009-4978, 03/2009, Volume 46, Número 7, pp. 46 - 46-4009 My vision by Reza Pahlavi por Adel Darwish Middle East, ISSN 0305-0734, 03/2002, Número 321, p. 22 Support for Reza Pahlavi, who advocates secular democracy, is growing inside Iran... Exile,Politics, Democracy, Royalty Modern Education in Iran during the Qajar and Pahlavi Periods por Koyagi, Mikiya History Compass, ISSN 1478-0542, 01/2009, Volume 7, Número 1, pp. 107 - 118 Historical writing on modern education in Iran has changed in the past few decades. Earlier works that focused on the top-down feature of modern education were... Education, Analysis, School construction Artigo de periódico : Texto completo online Recent Trends in the Historiography of Iran under the Pahlavi Dynasty, 1921–1979 por Schayegh, Cyrus History Compass, ISSN 1478-0542, 11/2008, Volume 6, Número 6, pp. 1400 - 1406 This article has two aims. It outlines the historiography of Pahlavi Iran, maintaining that historians have often written about this period from the perspective of the state... Education During the Reign of the Pahlavi Dynasty in Iran (1941-1979) por Hamdhaidari, Shokrollah Teaching in Higher Education, ISSN 1356-2517, 02/2008, Volume 13, Número 1, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Canterbury Christ Church University's Repository of Research Outputs Http
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Canterbury Research and Theses Environment Canterbury Christ Church University’s repository of research outputs http://create.canterbury.ac.uk Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. Revell, S. (2018) The 1953 coup in Iran: U.S. and British foreign policy in Iran, 1951-1953 and the covert operation to overthrow the elected government of Mohammad Mosaddeq. M.A. thesis, Canterbury Christ Church University. Contact: [email protected] The 1953 Coup in Iran: U.S. and British Foreign Policy in Iran, 1951-1953 and the Covert Operation to Overthrow the Elected Government of Mohammad Mosaddeq by Stephen Revell Canterbury Christ Church University Thesis submitted for the degree of Masters by Research 2018 Abstract The 1953 coup in Iran that overthrew the elected government of Mohammad Mosaddeq had a profound effect on Iranian history and U.S.-Iranian relations. The covert operation by the U.S. and British intelligence agencies abruptly ended a period of Iranian democracy and with it, efforts to nationalise the Iranian oil industry.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shah, the Islamic Revolution and the United States
    THE SHAH, THE ISLAMIC REVOLUTION AND THE UNITED STATES DARIOUSH BAYANDOR The Shah, the Islamic Revolution and the United States Darioush Bayandor The Shah, the Islamic Revolution and the United States Darioush Bayandor Nyon, Switzerland ISBN 978-3-319-96118-7 ISBN 978-3-319-96119-4 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96119-4 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018952482 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Instigated the White Revolution of the Shah and the People in Iran, 1963?
    Agent or Client: Who Instigated the White Revolution of the Shah and the People in Iran, 1963? A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2015 Michael J. Willcocks School of Arts, Languages and Cultures ! 2! Contents Photographs & Cartoons 5 ! Abstract 6 ! Declaration 7 ! Copyright Statement 8 ! Acknowledgements 9 Introduction 10 Literature Review: US-Iranian Relations and 10 Reform in Iran 1961-63 ! Approach 26 Contribution to Knowledge 28 ! Research Questions 28 ! Hypothesis 28 ! Methodology & Sources 29 ! Thesis Structure 31 ! Transliteration 32 ! ! Chapter 1: Iran! and the United States 1945-61 33 ! 1.1 US-Iranian Relations 1946-61 33 1.2 Iranian Situation 1953-61 39 Chapter 2: ʻAlī Amīnī: The Last Chance? 47 2.1 The Appointment of ʻAlī Amīnī 47 2.1.1 The Man 48 2.1.2 The Controversy 50 2.1.3 Events 52 2.1.4 Explanation 59 2.2 Amīnī’s Plan and Team 66 2.2.1 Amīnī’s Plan 66 2.2.2 Amīnī’s Cabinet 67 2.2.2.1 Ḥasan Arsanjānī 70 2.2.2.2 Nūr al-Dīn Alamūtī 72 2.2.2.3 Muḥammad Dirakhshish 73 2.2.3 A Divided Government 75 2.3 The White House Reacts 77 2.3.1 Economic Assistance 78 ! ! 3! 2.3.1.1 Transition to the Decade of Development 80 2.3.1.2 Reacting to the Crisis in Iran 84 2.3.2 The Iran Task Force 87 2.3.2.1 Policy Objectives 89 2.3.2.2 US Support for Amīnī 93 2.4 Amīnī’s Government: Generating Momentum 97 2.4.1 Anti-Corruption 98 2.4.2 Managing The Economy 100 2.4.3 Third Plan Preparations 101 2.4.4 Land Reform 102 ! Chapter 3: Controlling! the Future 106 !
    [Show full text]
  • Discursive Continuity of Political Nationalism As a Form of Opposition Politics in Modern Iran
    DISCURSIVE CONTINUITY OF POLITICAL NATIONALISM AS A FORM OF OPPOSITION POLITICS IN MODERN IRAN A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY PINAR ARIKAN SİNKAYA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS SEPTEMBER 2015 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Bağcı Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. İhsan Dağı (METU, IR) Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık (METU, IR) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Zana Çitak Aytürk (METU, IR) Asst. Prof. Dr. Derya Göçer Akder (METU, ARS) Assoc. Prof. Dr. İlker Aytürk (BİLKENT, POLS) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Pınar Arıkan Sinkaya Signature : iii ABSTRACT DISCURSIVE CONTINUITY OF POLITICAL NATIONALISM AS A FORM OF OPPOSITION POLITICS IN MODERN IRAN Arıkan Sinkaya, Pınar Ph.D., Department of International Relations Supervisor : Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık September 2015, 392 pages The dissertation examines political nationalism as a transformative power of modern Iranian politics at the societal level through historical-sociological study of four mass opposition movements, which are the Constitutional Movement (1906-11), National Front Movement (1949-53), Iranian Revolution Movement (1978-79), and Green Movement (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Musaddiq's Spectre: on the Recent Declassification of US Documents
    Musaddiq’s Spectre: On the Recent Declassification of US Documents Jul 17 2017 by Eskandar Sadeghi-Boroujerdi and Siavush Randjbar-Daemi [Tanks in the streets of Tehran in 1953. Image via Wilipedia] Following the 1989 release of the first Iran-related volume of the State Department’s Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS) series, a plethora of books and articles have been written detailing the MI6-CIA coup d’état in Iran on 19 August 1953. The coup resulted in the ouster of the much-celebrated Prime Minister Muhammad Musaddiq, who—to the profound chagrin of United Kingdom—nationalized the Anglo- Iranian Oil Company (today known as British Petroleum) in March 1951. One might therefore be forgiven for asking why the June 2017 release of a new FRUS volume series, Iran, 1951-1954, should spark so much public and scholarly interest. The main social networks used by Iranians, such as Telegram and Twitter, have been awash with commentary from amateur historians, political pundits, politicians, and casual observers alike. They have also carried the translation of the initial in-depth articles in response to the publication of this latest FRUS volume and produced by seasoned scholars of the period and topic. These include those of Ervand Abrahamian, Mark Gasiorowski, and Malcolm Byrne, published by Lobelog and the Wilson Center. A number of print publications in Tehran are readying extensive dossiers, and discussions are being held to produce a translation of most, if not all, of the documents contained in this new volume. What could this latest set of documents possibly add to what many both within the scholarly community and general public consider a cut-and-dried matter? Prior to the 15 June 2017 release, there was no paucity of sources attesting to the nature of the coup in the public domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Report
    Volume 1. CMER Middle East Report No 5. January-February 2020 Aims and Scope The CMER Middle East Report (ISBN 978-1-921492-39-6) is an electronic journal (e-journal) published by the Council of Middle East Relations, designed towards fulfilling one of the principal missions of the Council, namely the dissemination of academic research and other scholarly works. With all its inherent advantages, an e-journal serves as the best vehicle to carry CMER to the forefront of the global Middle East scholarly community. The CMER Middle East Report is a scholarly, multidisciplinary, internationally refereed publication focusing primarily on the Middle East and North Africa. The disciplines of interest encompass politics, history, religion, the environment, ethno-history, cultural heritage, social issues, economic development, war and conflict resolution, prehistory and the arts. The Council on Middle East Relations make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, we make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed of by The Council on Middle East Relations. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. The Council on Middle East Relations shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemispheres Studies on Cultures and Societies Vol. 29, No. 4
    Institute of Mediterranean and Oriental Cultures Polish Academy of Sciences Hemispheres Studies on Cultures and Societies Vol. 29, No. 4 IRAN Wydawnictwo Naukowe ASKON Warszawa 2014 Editor-in-Chief Board of Advisory Editors JERZY ZDANOWSKI GRZEGORZ J. KACZYÑSKI OLA EL KHAWAGA Subject Editor MAHNAZ ZAHIRINEJAD MILO MENDEL HARRY T. NORRIS English Text Consultants STANIS£AW PI£ASZEWICZ STEPHEN WALLIS EVARISTE N. PODA Secretary MARIA SK£ADANKOWA MICHA£ LIPA MICHA£ TYMOWSKI This edition is prepared, set and published by Wydawnictwo Naukowe ASKON Sp. z o.o. ul. Stawki 3/1, 00193 Warszawa tel./fax: (48) 22 635 99 37 www.askon.waw.pl [email protected] © Copyright by Institute of Mediterranean and Oriental Cultures, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw 2014 PL ISSN 02398818 ISBN 9788374520836 HEMISPHERES is published quarterly and is indexed in ERIH PLUS The Central European Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, ProQuest Database and Index Copernicus Contents Hooshang Amirahmadi, Iran-US Relations: Learning from Experience, Marching toward Reconciliation ............................................ 5 Michael Axworthy, Principles and Debates in Iranian Foreign Policy .........................................................................................................21 Elaheh Koolaee, Mohamad Javad Khansari, Samaneh Farzi, Iran and Islamic Fundamentalism in Central Asia ............................................33 Maciej Milczanowski, US Policy towards Iran under President Barack Obamas Administration .....................................53
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Policy of the USA and Great Britain Towards Iran During the Years 1951-1953
    SDÜ Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi SDU Faculty of Arts and Sciences Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Journal of Social Sciences Nisan 2014, Sayı:31, ss.329-346 April 2014, No:31, pp..329-346 The Foreign Policy of the USA and Great Britain Towards Iran During the Years 1951-1953 Michał ALAGIERSKI∗ ABSTRACT This article analyses the United States and Great Britain policy towards Iran between 1951 and 1953 when National Front leader Mohammad Mosaddegh was a Prime Minister. This particular period of Iranian history is directly related to the nationalization of Iranian oil industry carried out by this government at the expense of Great Britain. Important thread of this study is a question of British and American involvement in Iran as the British-Iranian conflict had been rising including diplomatic, economic and finally intelligence effort. It shows also the process of developing factors that influenced it. The paper points out challenges of British-American relations at this stage as well as difficult cooperation plane during the broader context of the Cold War. It finally determines clearness of Central Intelligence role in the Coup ended by overthrown of Iranian nationalists and replaced it by new suitable government for both Anglo-Saxon States. Keywords: British embargo on Iranian goods, CIA and SIS cooperation, Department of State policy toward Iran, Imperialism, Intelligence operation TPAJAX, Middle East question, Oil policy, Truman’s Doctrine, UN Security Council role, World Bank mediation Introduction The aim of this paper is to present the foreign policy of the United States of America and Great Britain towards Iran during the oil crisis from 1951 to 1953.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandarins, Paladins, and Pahlavis: the International Energy System, the United States, and the Dual Integration of Oil in Iran, 1925-1964
    MANDARINS, PALADINS, AND PAHLAVIS: THE INTERNATIONAL ENERGY SYSTEM, THE UNITED STATES, AND THE DUAL INTEGRATION OF OIL IN IRAN, 1925-1964 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Gregory Brew, M.A. Washington D.C. May 10, 2018 Copyright 2018 by Gregory Brew All Rights Reserved ii MANDARINS, PALADINS, AND PAHLAVIS: THE INTERNATIONAL ENERGY SYSTEM, THE UNITED STATES, AND THE DUAL INTEGRATION OF OIL IN IRAN, 1925-1964 Gregory Brew, M.A. Thesis Advisor: David S. Painter, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the integration of Iranian oil into a global oil system and the simultaneous use of oil revenues to fund internal economic development under the Pahlavi dynasty (1925-1979). It unites the local and global narratives of oil into a single synthesis through the interpretive tool of dual integration, which illustrates the evolution of Iran into a “petro-state” through an examination of the myriad relationships tying Iran’s government to the international energy system, the global development movement, and the Cold War policies of the United States. From 1925 to 1964, an oligopoly of oil companies sought to balance Iranian output with the rest of the world, managing price and production in order to avoid destructive competition and maximize profitability. To ensure the cooperation of the Pahlavi regime, the companies attempted to negotiate agreements based on “equitability,” satisfying the government’s ambitions through oil revenues. The Pahlavi shahs could translate this money into “oil power,” fund modernization projects, and expand the power of the central state.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reformation of the Political Opposition in Iran (1926–1946)
    THE REFORMATION OF THE POLITICAL OPPOSITION IN IRAN (1926–1946) A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY MURAT YÜMLÜ IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY DECEMBER 2016 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Tülin Gençöz Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Philosophy of Doctorate. Prof. Dr. Ömer Turan Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Philosophy of Doctorate. Prof. Dr. Recep Boztemur Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Recep Boztemur (METU, HIST) Prof. Dr. Özlem Tür (METU, IR) Prof. Dr. Mehmet Seyitdanlıo ğlu (Hacettepe Uni.,HIST ) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Birten Çelik (METU, HIST) Assist. Prof. Dr. Agâh Hazır (Yüzüncü Yıl Uni., IR) iii PLAGIARISM I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name : Murat Yümlü Signature : iii ABSTRACT THE REFORMATION OF THE POLITICAL OPPOSITION IN IRAN (1926–1946) Yümlü, Murat Ph. D. Department of History Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Recep Boztemur December 2016, 390 pages This dissertation aspires to analyze the reemergence of the political opposition in Iran during the period between 1926 and 1946 by adopting a historical perspective.
    [Show full text]