DOCSLIB.ORG

The Gannett Foundation Literacy Challenge Grants Program 1987-1990

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Gannett Foundation Literacy Challenge Grants Program 1987-1990 DOCUMENT RESUME ED 350 382 CE 060 810 AUTHOR Sibbison, Virginia Hayes TITLE The Gannett Foundation Literacy Challenge Grants Program 1987-1990. Assessment Report. INSTITUTION Welfare Research, Inc., Albany, N.Y. SPONS AGENCY Freedom Forum, Reston, VA. PUB DATE 92 NOTE 170p. AVAILABLE FROMWelfare Research, Inc. (WRI),112 StateStreet, Albany, NY 12207 ($15.99). PUB TYPE Reports Evaluative/Feasibility (142) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC07 Pius Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Basic Education; *Adult Literacy; *Adult Programs; Cooperative Programs; Coordination; *Educational Innovation; Grants; Illiteracy; *Literacy Education; Nonprofit Organizations; Private Sector; Program Effectiveness; Program Evaluation; State Government; State Programs; *Statewide Planning; Success IDENTIFIERS *Gannett Foundation ABSTRACT This report describes how 20 states and Puerto Rico used $2.7 million awarded by the Gannett Foundation to buildand expand adult literacy activities in a coordinated fashion statewide. Chapter 1 presents information on development of the Literacy Challenge grants program and brief descriptions of each project, including year funded, amount of awarded funds, andsponsoring agency. Chapter 2 provides an overview of the diversity, range, and magnitude of projects' efforts. Activitiesare generally grouped under information and referral, recruitment and training,resource and system expansion, evaluations, and unique projectcomponents. Chapter 3 discusses some complex and interesting aspects ofthe initiative, with specific attention tc influencing variables: diversity of aspirations and achievementsamong the projects; real and perceived barriers; influence of unique individuals; difficulties encountered in fundraising; and issues associated with the cooperative/collaborative process. Environments within whichthe projects operated are discussed. Chapter 4groups the projects into three major categories: likely, uncertain,or unlikely survival. Chapter 5 contains recommendations to the foundationregarding grant procedures, technical assistance, and monitoring. Appendixes include a list of goals and objectives of all projects and a list of all of the projects' activities and products. An attachedproducts list presents products in alphabetical order by state. Productsare classified according to their primary function in thestate. (YLB) **************::****"..:t*************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best thatcan be made from the original document. ****************************************************************i****** The Gannett Foundation Literacy Challenge Grants Program 1987-1990 A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office or Educational Researcnand Improvement ED CATIONAL RESOURCES "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY This document has been reproducedas rece.ed born the person or uttienattng organtiabon ;7 Minor changes have beenmade to improve reproduction quality Ponts of new or oom.onsstatedm this docu went do not necessarily represent&boat OE RI Dosttton of Policy TO THE Er .U1ATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIUN CENTER (ERIC)." BEST COPY AVAILABLE 2 The Gannett Foundation Literacy Challenge Grants Program 1987-1990 Submitted to The Freedom Forum by: Welfare Research, Inc. (WRI) 112 State Street Albany, New York 12207 Virginia Hayes Sibbison, Ph.D. Executive Director December 1991 © 1992 by WRI. All rights reserved. The Freedom Forum is the new name of the Gannett Foundation. FORLNI FRII manse SPERC4 FRAM 'own ii Prefatory Note The Freedom Forum is pleased that the Literacy Challenge, which we initiated as the Gannett Foundation, has now been fully and expertly documented and evaluated in this independent assessment report. The report clearly examines how this ambitious program was implemented, its goals, its activities, and its results. As the nation's largest media-related foundation, devoted to fostering free press, free speech, and free spirit, The Freedom Forum remains committed to the ideal of a literate, informed public as the platform for democracy. We hope that the record of the Literacy Challenge as set forth in this report will help adult literacy agencies and other organizations provide more effective services throughout the USA. 7d Charles L. Overby President and CEO The Freedom Forum The Gannett Foundation's Literacy Challenge In 1986, the Gannett Foundation, along with USA TODAY, initiated the Literacy Challenge grants program. The goals of the program were to establish lasting mechanisms for providing literacy services, to develop innovative state-level projects to permanently expand adult literacy services, and to make adult literacy services and resources permanently available in all parts of a state. Over the course of three years (1987- 1990), awards totaling nearly $2.7 million were granted to projects in 21 states. In late 1989, the Gannett Foundation contracted with Welfare Research, Inc. (WRI), a nonprofit research organization based in Albany, New York, to document the activities, impacts, and outcomes of the Literacy Challenge grant program. Three products resulted from this contract: a compilation of 21 Individual Project Reports, a state-by-state Products List, and this Assessment Report assessing the program as a whole and in detail. These publications are available from WRI, 112 State Street, Albany, NY 12207. The Freedom Forum is the new name of the Gannett Foundation. 111 Contents Prefatory Note 11 Acknowledgments Foreword vii Executive Summary xi Chapter One Development of the Gannett Foundation Literacy Challenge Grants Program 1 A. Year 1 Awards 3 B. Year 2 Awards 7 C. Bonus Awards 10 D. Summaries of Individual Project Characteristics 12 Chapter Two Significant Activities 15 A. Information and Referral 16 B. Recruitment and Training 24 C. Resource and System Expansion 33 D. Evaluations 48 E. Unique Project Components 53 Chapter Three Discussion 73 A. The Process 73 B. Influencing Variables 75 C. Operating Environments 81 Chapter Four Outcomes of the Coalitions 103 A. Coalition Survival: Likely 103 B. Coalition Survival: Uncertain 106 C. Coalition Survival: Unlikely 108 Chapter Five Recommendations 113 Contents iv Appendices Appendix A: Project Goals and Objectives 115 Appendix B. Reported Activities and Results 131 Tables Table 1: Estimated Number or Percentage of Functional Illiterates 1.2 Table 2: Challenge Grant Funds Received 13 Table 3: Sponsoring Agency 14 Table 4: Significant Activities 17 V Acknowledgments e would like to thank The Freedom Forum (formerly the Gannett Foundation) for its support of this initiative. The decision to undertake an assessment of the Literacy Challenge grants program was a thoughtful and somewhat unusual one in that the funds had already been spent. It was insightful to recognize that retrospective lessons could be learned from both the successes and the failures of the projects. Special appreciation is extended to Christy C. Bulkeley, Freedom Forum Vice President, whose commitment to adult literacy issues, and to this project in particular, has been unwavering. The dedication of her time and energy to reviewing drafts of the 21 Individual Project Reports as well as this Assessment Report was crucial to the conduct of our work. We would also like to thank the project managers and associated board members of the 21 projects who graciously extended their cooperation during our site visits and numerous telephone conversations. One of the mosc enjoyable aspects of our work was the opportunity to meet this group of dedicated, unfailingly optimistic professionals. Finally, the author wishes to acknowledge the invaluable contributions of four WRI staff members in the development and production of this report: Guy Farrell, Associate Director, who conducted eight site visits and provided comments on the projects; Rebecca McBride, Senior Writer/Editor, to whom fell the monumental task of editing all 21 Individual Project Reports as well as this report; Stephanie Richardson, Production Manager, who provided design and production assistance; and Michelle Burns, Executive Secretary. Virgini HayesSibZ" Executive Dir&tor, Welfare Research, Inc. Project Director, Gannett Foundation Literacy Challenge Project Acknowledgments vii Foreword n the summer of 1986, the Gannett Foundation (now known as The Freedom Forum) and USA TODAY challenged state literacy and government leaders to collaborate to expand literacy services in their states. The Foundation offered $1 million in grants up to $100,000 for the first year's activities. The Literacy Challenge eventually grew to nearly $2.7 million in grants and involved 20 states plus Puerto Rico. Grant support by state varied from one year to three years. This report covers what happenedand what didn't happenwith those funded projects. It also offers an analysis to help guide future collaborative efforts, not only among literacy providers, but among any human service providers working at the state level with local service delivery. Some background is in order. The Literacy Challenge grew out of a conversation in thesummer of 1986 between Charles L. Overby, then a news executive with Gannett Co., Inc., and Eugene C. Dorsey, then president ofthe Gannett Foundation. Overby, now president and CEO of The Freedom Forum, wondered aboutthe possibility of a national literacy campaign involving USA TODAY, buildingon the Foundation's 18-month-old special adult literacy project. Growth in the value of Gannett Co., Inc. stock, the Foundation's primaryasset, led Dorsey to believe the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Progressive Potential of Journalism Education: Recasting the Academic Versus Professional Debate Stephen D
    The International Journal of Press/Politics http://hij.sagepub.com The Progressive Potential of Journalism Education: Recasting the Academic versus Professional Debate Stephen D. Reese The International Journal of Press/Politics 1999; 4; 70 DOI: 10.1177/1081180X9900400405 The online version of this article can be found at: http://hij.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/4/4/70 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for The International Journal of Press/Politics can be found at: Email Alerts: http://hij.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://hij.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations http://hij.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/4/4/70 Downloaded from http://hij.sagepub.com at UNIV OF TEXAS AUSTIN on July 21, 2009 The Progressive Potential of Journalism Education Recasting the Academic versus Professional Debate Stephen D. Reese The crisis in the journalism profession has led an ever more concentrated corpo- rate voice to assert itself in academia, diverting blame and shaping how future jour nalists are prepared. Historically interdisciplinary, oriented toward the liberal arts yet professional, journalism education faces mounting pressure to abandon its aca- demic ethos to embrace its industry patrons, choosing from a false dichotomy ad- vanced forcefully by a recent journalism foundation-supported research report.To preserve its value, however, journalism must be part of broader academic reforms, modeling an intellectually independent integration of theory and practice, support- ing not just a media labor pyramid, but also a press-literate public. As with other modern institutions, higher education in the United States has been under attack for many years, its practices in question and public confi- dence eroding.The occupational prestige of the professor, once among the high- est in American society, has slipped sharply.
    [Show full text]
  • Annie Stone, 703-217-1169 Jonathan Thompson, 202-821-8926 [email protected] [email protected]
    Contact: Annie Stone, 703-217-1169 Jonathan Thompson, 202-821-8926 [email protected] [email protected] NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER TO DISPLAY 50-TON FIRST AMENDMENT TABLET FROM NEWSEUM FACADE Pennsylvania Avenue’s iconic First Amendment stone tablet finds new home on Independence Mall in Philadelphia Philadelphia, PA (March 18, 2021) – The National Constitution Center announced it will be the new home for the iconic First Amendment tablet from the former Newseum building in Washington, D.C. The 50-ton marble tablet, engraved with the 45 words of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, was displayed on the four-story-high, 74-foot-tall Pennsylvania Avenue façade of the Newseum, a nonprofit museum founded by the Freedom Forum and dedicated to the five freedoms of the First Amendment. Work has begun to remove the stone pieces from the building, which was sold to Johns Hopkins University after the Newseum closed in 2019. The tablet remained the property of the Freedom Forum, and will be a gift to the National Constitution Center. The tablet will be reconfigured and emplaced along a 100-foot-wide wall on the National Constitution Center’s Grand Hall Overlook, the second-floor atrium overlooking historic Independence Mall. “We are thrilled to bring this heroic marble tablet of the First Amendment to the National Constitution Center, to inspire visitors from across America and around the world for generations to come,” said National Constitution Center President and CEO Jeffrey Rosen. “It’s so meaningful to bring
    [Show full text]
  • 2009-10 Annual Report:Layout 1
    Contents Offices ABOUT THE ABOUT THIS FREEDOM FORUM ANNUAL REPORT FREEDOM FORUM 2009-10 ANNUAL REPORT FREEDOM FORUM HEADQUARTERS NEWSEUM • FIRST AMENDMENT CENTER • DIVERSITY INSTITUTE 555 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. The Freedom Forum, based in This report focuses on the Washington, DC 20001 Washington, D.C., is a nonpartisan Freedom Forum and the entities Tel: 202/292-6100 foundation that champions the it helps support: the First Fax: 202/292-6245 First Amendment as a corner- Amendment Center, the Diversity E-mail: [email protected] stone of democracy. Institute and the Newseum. Freedom Forum Experts.....................................................2 NEWSEUM The Newseum is publishing a 555 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. The Freedom Forum is the main separate annual report with Letter from the Chairman and CEO.....................................3 Washington, DC 20001 funder of the operations of the detailed information about its Tel: 202/292-6100 Newseum, an interactive galleries, operations and finances. Fax: 202/292-6245 museum of news in Washington, Newseum ..........................................................................4 D.C.; the First Amendment For more Newseum information, Toll-free: 888/NEWSEUM see the Newseum’s 2009-10 E-mail: [email protected] Center; and the Diversity Insti- First Amendment Center ..................................................10 tute. The First Amendment annual report, available online at FIRST AMENDMENT CENTER Center and the Diversity Institute http://www.freedomforum.org/ at Vanderbilt University
    [Show full text]
  • Download Fsc Case for Support
    The Free Speech Center website features articles, news and insights about free expression in America. http://freespeech.center Contact [email protected] 615.438.7545 1 The First Amendment is for EVERYONE. It is nonpartisan. It has the power to UNIFY us. These five freedoms allow us to engage in WORDS, not wars. Yet only 2% of Americans can name these five freedoms, and 21% of Americans cannot name even one. THIS NEEDS TO CHANGE, AND THE OPPORTUNITY IS NOW. PROMOTING AWARENESS AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT Case for Support The FREE SPEECH CENTER (FSC) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan national center whose mission is to build support and understanding for the First Amendment through education, entertainment, and engagement. The center’s activities and programs are devoted to educational efforts that will ensure every high school and college student in America fully understands the five freedoms of the First Amendment and what they stand for. Nonpartisan initiatives also build broad public aware- ness of the First Amendment’s continuing relevance. Located on the campus of Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU is FSC’s fiscal sponsor) and officially launched in 2019, the center expands upon decades of effective programs created by Founder and Director Ken Paulson. Unique among civic education efforts, the FSC builds upon strong relationships with media, and expands the message to millions of Americans. In this time of divisiveness, broadening recognition of these five vital freedoms are fundamental to our nation’s future. Director Ken Paulson is a First Paulson, who has a law degree from Amendment expert, lawyer, and University of Illinois College of Law, journalist.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 0 0 5 Volume 46 • Number 4
    Educating tomorrow’s electronic media professionals. VOLUME 46 • NUMBER 4 • 2005 Feedback JULY 2 0 0 5 [ FEEDBACK ] July 2005 (Vol. 46, No. 4) Feedback is an electronic journal scheduled for posting six times a year at www.beaweb.org by the Broadcast Education Association. As an electronic journal, Feedback publishes (1) articles or essays— especially those of pedagogical value—on any aspect of electronic media: (2) responsive essays—especially industry analysis and those reacting to issues and concerns raised by previous Feedback articles and essays; (3) scholarly papers: (4) reviews of books, video, audio, film and web resources and other instructional materials; and (5) official announcements of the BEA and news from BEA Districts and Interest Divisions. Feedback is not a peer-reviewed journal. All communication regarding business, membership questions, information about past issues of Feedback and changes of address should be sent to the Executive Director, 1771 N. Street NW, Washington D.C. 20036. SUBMISSION GUIDELINES 1. Submit an electronic version of the complete manuscript with references and charts in Microsoft Word along with graphs, audio/video and other graphic attachments to the editor. Retain a hard copy for refer- ence. 2. Please double-space the manuscript. Use the 5th edition of the American Psychological Association (APA) style manual. 3. Articles are limited to 3,000 words or less, and essays to 1,500 words or less. 4. All authors must provide the following information: name, employer, professional rank and/or title, complete mailing address, telephone and fax numbers, email address, and whether the writing has been presented at a prior venue.
    [Show full text]
  • A Parent's Guide to Religion in the Public Schools
    A Parent’s Guide to Religion in the Public Schools National PTA Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. —First Amendment United States Constitution arents are recognized as having the primary responsibility for the upbringing P of their children, including education. For this reason, parents need to be fully informed about school policies and practices, including all issues concerning religion and religious liberty in public education. The following questions and answers are intended to help parents understand the reli- gious liberty rights of students and the appropri- ate role for religion in the public school curricu- lum. A number of recent documents represent a growing consensus among many religious and educational groups about the constitutional and educational role of religion in public schools.1 This pamphlet is designed to build on these agreements and to encourage communities to find common ground when they are divided. The following questions and answers provide general information on the subject of religious expression and practices in schools. The answers are based on First Amendment religious liberty principles as currently interpreted by the courts and agreed to by a wide range of religious and educational organizations. For a more in-depth examination of the issues, parents should con- sult the guide listed at the end of this publica- tion. If parents have specific legal questions, the services of a qualified attorney should be sought.
    [Show full text]
  • You May Download the Contents of This Page Here
    FREEDOM OF SPEECH/PRESS ADVOCATES U.S. - Society of Professional Journalist (http://www.spj.org) “The Society of Professional Journalists works to improve and protect journalism. The organization is the nation’s most broad-based journalism organization, dedicated to encouraging the free practice of journalism and stimulating high standards of ethical behavior. Founded in 1909 as Sigma Delta Chi, SPJ promotes the free flow of information vital to a well-informed citizenry; works to inspire and educate the next generation of journalists; and protects First Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech and press.” - The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (http://www.rcfp.org) “For more than 40 years, the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press has provided free legal advice, resources, support and advocacy to protect the First Amendment and Freedom of Information rights of journalists working in areas where U.S. law applies, regardless of the medium in which their work appears. Funded by corporate, foundation and individual contributions, the Reporters Committee serves more than 2,000 reporters, editors and media lawyers who call for help each year, as well as the tens of thousands who use its website.” - First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University (http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org) “The center supports the First Amendment and builds understanding of its core freedoms through education, information and entertainment. The center serves as a forum for the study and exploration of free-expression issues, including freedom of speech, of the press and of religion, and the rights to assemble and to petition the government. Founded by John Seigenthaler, the First Amendment Center is an operating program of the Freedom Forum and is associated with the Newseum and the Diversity Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Lotsii-Lj- Marilyn J
    UIORLD PREOOI III IIKMIIOO1IIII111111 A Coordination Group of National and International News Media Organizations October 6, 1998 His Excellency Kofi A. Annan Secretary-General E 6 E 0 W United Nations Room 3800, United Nations Headquarters New York, NY 10017 EXECUTIVE OFFICE Dear Mr. Secretary-General, OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL to your ^ ^ week. Your topic — 'Regardless of Frontiers:' Article 19 in a World of Sovereign States — is certainly most appropriate in this 50th anniversary year of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We anticipate a packed house at the Madison Hotel, and I know that you will be pleased with the reception you find there. Enclosed please find a list of those individuals who have 'Indurated they will be with us for the luncheon and lecture. Responses continue to come in, so the list could change somewhat. To give you an idea of the schedule for this event, here is a general outline: We have invited guests for 12:30 p.m., to leave time for settling down and for a glass of wine. We can begin the program at 1 p.m. or once you've had a chance to enjoy your lunch and become comfortable. Jim Ottaway, Jr., our chairman, will introduce you briefly and will acknowledge the presence of at least four press freedom heroes ~ Doan Viet Hoat of Vietnam; Christine Anyanwu of Nigeria; Kenneth Best of Liberia and Gambia; and Yndimiro Restano of Cuba. Following your address, .if you are willing, _we w|ll entertain ^Jguesy_pns_fi;pJ]yhe_audience. And at some time during the program, if you agree, it would be wonderful if you would give your end^ement to the Char foraFreePress, whi^hjvejike to_call_an impement for putting Article 19 intojpractice.
    [Show full text]
  • Press, Power Politics
    Press, Power & Politics AFRICA MEDIA FORUM September 27-28, 2000 • Accra, Ghana Board of Trustees PRESS, POWER & POLITICS • AFRICA MEDIA FORUM Charles L. Overby, Chairman Contents Page and Chief Executive Officer Peter S. Prichard, President Ghanaian media face test in covering election 1 Harry W. Brooks Jr. Madelyn P. Jennings Government minister cautions press against ‘reckless sensationalism’ 2 Malcolm R. Kirschenbaum Bette Bao Lord Former U.S. senator urges unifying Ghanaian press Brian Mulroney 2 Jan Neuharth Will Norton Jr. Candidates field questions from press, public 3 John C. Quinn Josefina A. Salas-Porras John Seigenthaler Media scramble to cover crucial Ghanaian elections 4 Paul Simon Ghanaian cartoonists lament their professional isolation and Allen H. Neuharth, Founder vulnerability to lawsuits 6 Editorial: Maurice R. Fliess Net technology making inroads into Ghanaian journalism Rod Sandeen 6 Photos: West African editor: Journalists must cope with ‘government arrogance’ 7 Judy G. Rolfe Map: Freedom Forum opens library for journalists in Mali 8 Grant Jerding The Freedom Forum World Center 1101 Wilson Blvd. Forum in Accra, Ghana, examines coverage Arlington, VA 22209 USA Tel: 703/528-0800 of political campaigns across Africa Fax: 703/284-3529 E-mail: [email protected] The Freedom Forum continued its year- democratic constitution in 1992 set the Internet: www.freedomforum.org long series of international media forums on stage for the blossoming of independent “Press, Power & news organizations to compete against the African Center Politics” Sept. 27-28 state-owned media, which remain strong. 7TH Floor, JHI House in Accra, Ghana. Related training sessions for Ghanaian 11 Cradock Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • A Freedom Forum Report on the Peruvian Media
    A Freedom Forum report on the Peruvian media. Caracas GUYANA FRENCH GUIANA VENEZUELA (France) Bogota COLOMBIA SURINAME Quito ECUADOR PERU BRAZIL Lima La Paz BOLIVIA Pacific Ocean PARAGUAY CHILE Atlantic Ocean ARGENTINA N URUGUAY 0 250 Miles PRESS, POWER & POLITICS PERU Written by Corinne Schmidt Edited by Joan Mower CORINNE SCHMIDT is coordinator of the Latin American Studies Program at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Md., where she is also a doctoral candi- date. Previously, she was a journalist in Lima, Peru for The Washington Post and other publications. She also has served as a Foreign Service officer at the U.S. Embassies in Peru and Ecuador. She is a graduate of the College of William and Mary. JOAN MOWER is director of Africa, Latin America programs at The Freedom Forum in Arlington,Va. She joined the media foundation in 1993. Previously, she worked as a journalist for the Associated Press, based in Washington, and for United Press International in George, South Carolina and Massachusetts. She was also a Foreign Service officer. A graduate of the University of California at Berkeley, she holds a master’s degree from Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies. CONTENTS Foreword . .v Introduction . .1 History and Society . .5 Politics and Elections . .9 The Press . .12 The Chicha Press . .14 Magazines . .17 Television . .18 Radio . .22 Peruvian Media Online . .22 The Business of Media . .24 Media Organizations . .26 Journalism Education . .27 Media’s Role in Politics . .28 Media Under Threat in the Fujimori Regime . .32 Control of Information . .35 Coverage of the Presidential Campaign 2000 .
    [Show full text]
  • 095.04 SOFA 2004 BOOKLET.Qxp
    STATE of the FIRST AMENDMENT 2004 FIRST AMENDMENT CENTER ONLINE firstamendmentcenter.org Your first stop for the First Amendment State of the First Amendment 2004 ©2004 First Amendment Center 1207 18th Ave. S. Nashville, TN 37212 615/727-1600 1101 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA 22209 703/528-0800 Project Coordinators: Gene Policinski, Ken Paulson Editorial Director: Christy Mumford Jerding Design: Sonya Watson Graphics and Production: Mark Sandeen Survey conducted by: Center for Survey Research and Analysis at the University of Connecticut Publication: 04-F04 To order: 800/830-3733 or send e-mail to [email protected] Contents I. Foreword . 1 Gene Policinski Executive Director/First Amendment Center II. Analysis Americans appear willing to regulate others’ speech . 7 Paul K. McMasters First Amendment Ombudsman American attitudes about the First Amendment . 10 Conducted by the Center for Survey Research & Analysis at the University of Connecticut III. State of the First Amendment Survey 2004 . 23 IV. Methodology . 43 V. Commentary: From the authors of “Inside the First Amendment” Public: low marks for the nation’s press . 47 Paul K. McMasters First Amendment Ombudsman Freedom takes strong stomach, but many of us have indigestion . 50 Charles C. Haynes Senior Scholar/First Amendment Center Foreword By Gene Policinski Executive Director/First Amendment Center reedom is making a the Sept. 11, 2001, terror comeback — of sorts. attacks and the needs of a F new global war on terror- Nearly two-thirds of ism. Some restrictions on Americans responding to freedoms seemed to prom- the 2004 State of the First ise greater security and safe- Amendment survey dis- ty to a nation shocked by agree with the statement violence at home and that “the First Amendment abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois First Amendment Center
    Illinois First Amendment Center Typhonian Claybourne still empty: misunderstood and tetrandrous Barton scores quite growlingly but acknowledge her stigmata unsuitably. Jerald often experiments hardheadedly when acellular Tallie tubulate pushing and badger her skim. Which Ben pigeonholing so animally that Cammy remising her disbelief? Laws on public records and private emails vary greatly across the nation, and administrative decisions and court rulings also fail the draw clear lines. Others on the panel are Victor Rosario, Cathy Bennett, and Ron Sullivan, in the finale to place course taught by Lecturer on Law Lisa Kavanaugh. Hundreds of various radio stations are licensed through universities and colleges across the United States. America, and has serviced us extraordinarily well. Officer Goodman Tells Sen. You follow its history when asked about a new england first amendment center? The illinois prison libraries by other human rights at illinois first amendment center. Can first solve this chess problem of how single pawn against numerous opposing pieces? Here on can burn the Illinois Learning Standards as range as information for teachers, students and parents. There is damn great band of uncertainty concerning just what obscenity is, trump once defined, whether cap is protected by direction First Amendment. First Amendment rights are not absolute. We tried it here suffice it failed miserably. To best continue making work, degree need to allow anyone money is critical or shadow of lost Title IX reporting system will talk with us openly and freely. Why did you might include: a national program summer institute is worried about giving springfield, illinois first amendment center employees, illinois college does not waive your justice center employees from many times? That contract to imply certain rights, such as attending games, and might try out each procedure by them to behavior that right.
    [Show full text]