095.04 SOFA 2004 BOOKLET.Qxp

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

095.04 SOFA 2004 BOOKLET.Qxp STATE of the FIRST AMENDMENT 2004 FIRST AMENDMENT CENTER ONLINE firstamendmentcenter.org Your first stop for the First Amendment State of the First Amendment 2004 ©2004 First Amendment Center 1207 18th Ave. S. Nashville, TN 37212 615/727-1600 1101 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA 22209 703/528-0800 Project Coordinators: Gene Policinski, Ken Paulson Editorial Director: Christy Mumford Jerding Design: Sonya Watson Graphics and Production: Mark Sandeen Survey conducted by: Center for Survey Research and Analysis at the University of Connecticut Publication: 04-F04 To order: 800/830-3733 or send e-mail to [email protected] Contents I. Foreword . 1 Gene Policinski Executive Director/First Amendment Center II. Analysis Americans appear willing to regulate others’ speech . 7 Paul K. McMasters First Amendment Ombudsman American attitudes about the First Amendment . 10 Conducted by the Center for Survey Research & Analysis at the University of Connecticut III. State of the First Amendment Survey 2004 . 23 IV. Methodology . 43 V. Commentary: From the authors of “Inside the First Amendment” Public: low marks for the nation’s press . 47 Paul K. McMasters First Amendment Ombudsman Freedom takes strong stomach, but many of us have indigestion . 50 Charles C. Haynes Senior Scholar/First Amendment Center Foreword By Gene Policinski Executive Director/First Amendment Center reedom is making a the Sept. 11, 2001, terror comeback — of sorts. attacks and the needs of a F new global war on terror- Nearly two-thirds of ism. Some restrictions on Americans responding to freedoms seemed to prom- the 2004 State of the First ise greater security and safe- Amendment survey dis- ty to a nation shocked by agree with the statement violence at home and that “the First Amendment abroad. goes too far in the rights it guarantees.” In the 2003 survey, the nation appeared to catch its Two years ago, the survey collective breath and recon- I showed virtually a 50-50 sider the balance between split on whether the First security and freedom: 34% Amendment gives us too said the First Amendment much freedom, as gives us too much freedom, Americans grappled with with 60% disagreeing. the immediate aftermath of The First Amendment became part of the U.S. Constitution more than 200 years ago. This is what it says: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Based on your own feelings about the First Amendment, please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: The First Amendment goes too far in the rights it guarantees. 1999 16% 12% Strongly agree 2000 10% 12% Mildly agree 2001 29% 10% 2002 41% 8% 2003 19% 15% 2004 19% 11% State of the First Amendment 2004 1 The trend continues this sion or public access to what kind of restrictions year with an additional information — from so- should be permitted — and nine-point swing, to a 30%- called free-speech zones on in recent years, whether 65% split in favor of First campus to the installation our very freedom makes us Amendment freedoms of filters on public library more vulnerable to those despite military action computers to a rising tide who would attack us. overseas and recurring of government secrecy — homeland alerts about pos- increasingly were common. Over time Americans sible domestic terrorist appear able to shake off threats — findings that are The annual surveys have emotions of the moment a return to results typical of shown that few Americans and put free-expression what State of the First — typically 2% or less — issues in perspective. The Amendment surveys found could name unaided all five rebalancing of opinion in the years just before the freedoms in the First about First Amendment terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, Amendment (speech, reli- freedoms is but one exam- 2001. gion, press, assembly and ple. Another from the 2004 petition), but that when survey is that despite the These annual State of the reminded of them, uproar following the Janet First Amendment surveys Americans continued to Jackson breast-baring inci- by the First Amendment hold the concepts in high dent at Super Bowl XXXVI- Center began in 1997 amid regard. II on Feb. 1, nearly six in concerns that the First 10 respondents said just a Amendment was not being The surveys have shown a few months later that the taught in depth in the nation in a vigorous debate nation has about the right nation’s schools and that with itself over how much amount of government reg- restraints on free expres- freedom we should have, ulation of television and Overall, do you think the press in America has too much freedom to do what it wants, too little freedom to do what it wants, or is the amount of freedom the press has about right? 38% 1997 9% Too much press 50% freedom 53% 1999 7% 37% 51% Too little press 2000 7% freedom 41% 46% 2001 8% About the right 42% amount of press 42% freedom 2002 8% 49% 46% 2003 9% 43% 42% 2004 12% 44% 2 Foreword In your view, who should be primarily responsible for keeping inappropriate television programming away from children: parents, government officials or broadcasters? Government officials 5% Broadcasters 14% Parents Don’t know/ 80% refused to answer 1% radio with regard to sexual- particularly to others — and p.m. time frame to also ly related content. particularly about freedom include late-night and of the press. overnight programs. And despite loud calls for And even though cable more government power to Among key findings in the programming today is punish broadcasters for 2004 survey: exempt from FCC stan- material some find offen- dards applied to broad- sive — and action in · In response to a general casters, 54% would sup- Congress to increase dra- question, 58% said cur- port applying the same matically the fines that can rent government regu- 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. regu- be levied — parents are the lation on broadcast tel- lations to cable televi- overwhelming choice (with evision with regard to sion, with 45% in favor government a distant third) references to sexual of applying such regu- among survey respondents activity is about right; lation around-the- as the primary authority to 16% said there is too clock. keep inappropriate content much and 21% said in the media away from there is too little regu- · Parents, by wide major- children. lation. ity — from 71% to 87% — are seen as having Still, Americans continue to · But when asked more the main responsibility be ambivalent (some would specific questions, 49% to keep children from say contradictory) in their would extend that seeing “inappropriate support for specific free- authority beyond the material” on television, doms as they are applied, existing 6 a.m. to 10 radio, movies or print- State of the First Amendment 2004 3 When you say or hear the Pledge of Allegiance, which includes the phrase “one nation, under God,” do you think of that phrase as primarily a religious statement, or as primarily a statement related to the American political tradition? 2003 2004 Neither Neither 1% 3% Both Both 6% 5% Don’t know/ Don’t know/ refused to refused to answer answer 2% 2% Primarily a religious Primarily a religious Primarily a Primarily a statement statement statement related statement related 18% 19% to the American to the American political tradition political tradition 73% 71% ed material. Survey The 2004 State of the First Even as the House and respondents ranked the Amendment survey found Senate are attempting to content providers — many Americans with a reconcile differing versions programmers, movie resurgent regard for the of legislation to vastly producers or theater overall values of the First increase fines that can be owners and publishers Amendment. But it also levied by the Federal — as the second-most- found many divided and Communications responsible group, with undecided in an increasing- Commission against those government running a ly vocal and visible search who broadcast “indecent” distant third or fourth for the correct balance of programming, program- choice (depending on personal freedom and pub- mers from MTV to TBS are the scenario). lic safety, free expression toning down language and and personal standards, images in response to pub- · Even as 67% of those personal responsibility and lic complaints. responding to the sur- media performance. vey said that the What Thomas Jefferson nation’s educational Americans are engaged in called “the marketplace of system does a fair-to- public debate and legal or ideas,” where Americans poor job of teaching legislative action on issues would debate, discuss and students about the First ranging from a proposed decide issues of democracy, Amendment, 72% dis- constitutional amendment is alive and well and vigor- agreed that a high to allow the banning of ous … with the discussion school student should flag-desecration to the post- being prompted by a bit of be allowed to wear a T- ing of the Ten halftime help from Ms. shirt with a message or Commandments in public Jackson and her “wardrobe picture that might be buildings to the wording of malfunction.” offensive to others. the Pledge of Allegiance. 4 Foreword Analysis Americans appear willing to regulate others’ speech By Paul K. McMasters First Amendment Ombudsman ne theme persists entertainment media, yet over the eight years they are willing to broaden Othat the First government regulation in Amendment Center has that area. conducted the State of the First Amendment survey: Nearly eight in 10 said the In the minds of many press has a government Americans, there is a trou- watchdog role, but four in bling disconnect between 10 said the press has too principle and practice when much freedom.
Recommended publications
  • Progressive Potential of Journalism Education: Recasting the Academic Versus Professional Debate Stephen D
    The International Journal of Press/Politics http://hij.sagepub.com The Progressive Potential of Journalism Education: Recasting the Academic versus Professional Debate Stephen D. Reese The International Journal of Press/Politics 1999; 4; 70 DOI: 10.1177/1081180X9900400405 The online version of this article can be found at: http://hij.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/4/4/70 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for The International Journal of Press/Politics can be found at: Email Alerts: http://hij.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://hij.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations http://hij.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/4/4/70 Downloaded from http://hij.sagepub.com at UNIV OF TEXAS AUSTIN on July 21, 2009 The Progressive Potential of Journalism Education Recasting the Academic versus Professional Debate Stephen D. Reese The crisis in the journalism profession has led an ever more concentrated corpo- rate voice to assert itself in academia, diverting blame and shaping how future jour nalists are prepared. Historically interdisciplinary, oriented toward the liberal arts yet professional, journalism education faces mounting pressure to abandon its aca- demic ethos to embrace its industry patrons, choosing from a false dichotomy ad- vanced forcefully by a recent journalism foundation-supported research report.To preserve its value, however, journalism must be part of broader academic reforms, modeling an intellectually independent integration of theory and practice, support- ing not just a media labor pyramid, but also a press-literate public. As with other modern institutions, higher education in the United States has been under attack for many years, its practices in question and public confi- dence eroding.The occupational prestige of the professor, once among the high- est in American society, has slipped sharply.
    [Show full text]
  • Annie Stone, 703-217-1169 Jonathan Thompson, 202-821-8926 [email protected] [email protected]
    Contact: Annie Stone, 703-217-1169 Jonathan Thompson, 202-821-8926 [email protected] [email protected] NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER TO DISPLAY 50-TON FIRST AMENDMENT TABLET FROM NEWSEUM FACADE Pennsylvania Avenue’s iconic First Amendment stone tablet finds new home on Independence Mall in Philadelphia Philadelphia, PA (March 18, 2021) – The National Constitution Center announced it will be the new home for the iconic First Amendment tablet from the former Newseum building in Washington, D.C. The 50-ton marble tablet, engraved with the 45 words of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, was displayed on the four-story-high, 74-foot-tall Pennsylvania Avenue façade of the Newseum, a nonprofit museum founded by the Freedom Forum and dedicated to the five freedoms of the First Amendment. Work has begun to remove the stone pieces from the building, which was sold to Johns Hopkins University after the Newseum closed in 2019. The tablet remained the property of the Freedom Forum, and will be a gift to the National Constitution Center. The tablet will be reconfigured and emplaced along a 100-foot-wide wall on the National Constitution Center’s Grand Hall Overlook, the second-floor atrium overlooking historic Independence Mall. “We are thrilled to bring this heroic marble tablet of the First Amendment to the National Constitution Center, to inspire visitors from across America and around the world for generations to come,” said National Constitution Center President and CEO Jeffrey Rosen. “It’s so meaningful to bring
    [Show full text]
  • 2009-10 Annual Report:Layout 1
    Contents Offices ABOUT THE ABOUT THIS FREEDOM FORUM ANNUAL REPORT FREEDOM FORUM 2009-10 ANNUAL REPORT FREEDOM FORUM HEADQUARTERS NEWSEUM • FIRST AMENDMENT CENTER • DIVERSITY INSTITUTE 555 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. The Freedom Forum, based in This report focuses on the Washington, DC 20001 Washington, D.C., is a nonpartisan Freedom Forum and the entities Tel: 202/292-6100 foundation that champions the it helps support: the First Fax: 202/292-6245 First Amendment as a corner- Amendment Center, the Diversity E-mail: [email protected] stone of democracy. Institute and the Newseum. Freedom Forum Experts.....................................................2 NEWSEUM The Newseum is publishing a 555 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. The Freedom Forum is the main separate annual report with Letter from the Chairman and CEO.....................................3 Washington, DC 20001 funder of the operations of the detailed information about its Tel: 202/292-6100 Newseum, an interactive galleries, operations and finances. Fax: 202/292-6245 museum of news in Washington, Newseum ..........................................................................4 D.C.; the First Amendment For more Newseum information, Toll-free: 888/NEWSEUM see the Newseum’s 2009-10 E-mail: [email protected] Center; and the Diversity Insti- First Amendment Center ..................................................10 tute. The First Amendment annual report, available online at FIRST AMENDMENT CENTER Center and the Diversity Institute http://www.freedomforum.org/ at Vanderbilt University
    [Show full text]
  • Download Fsc Case for Support
    The Free Speech Center website features articles, news and insights about free expression in America. http://freespeech.center Contact [email protected] 615.438.7545 1 The First Amendment is for EVERYONE. It is nonpartisan. It has the power to UNIFY us. These five freedoms allow us to engage in WORDS, not wars. Yet only 2% of Americans can name these five freedoms, and 21% of Americans cannot name even one. THIS NEEDS TO CHANGE, AND THE OPPORTUNITY IS NOW. PROMOTING AWARENESS AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT Case for Support The FREE SPEECH CENTER (FSC) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan national center whose mission is to build support and understanding for the First Amendment through education, entertainment, and engagement. The center’s activities and programs are devoted to educational efforts that will ensure every high school and college student in America fully understands the five freedoms of the First Amendment and what they stand for. Nonpartisan initiatives also build broad public aware- ness of the First Amendment’s continuing relevance. Located on the campus of Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU is FSC’s fiscal sponsor) and officially launched in 2019, the center expands upon decades of effective programs created by Founder and Director Ken Paulson. Unique among civic education efforts, the FSC builds upon strong relationships with media, and expands the message to millions of Americans. In this time of divisiveness, broadening recognition of these five vital freedoms are fundamental to our nation’s future. Director Ken Paulson is a First Paulson, who has a law degree from Amendment expert, lawyer, and University of Illinois College of Law, journalist.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 0 0 5 Volume 46 • Number 4
    Educating tomorrow’s electronic media professionals. VOLUME 46 • NUMBER 4 • 2005 Feedback JULY 2 0 0 5 [ FEEDBACK ] July 2005 (Vol. 46, No. 4) Feedback is an electronic journal scheduled for posting six times a year at www.beaweb.org by the Broadcast Education Association. As an electronic journal, Feedback publishes (1) articles or essays— especially those of pedagogical value—on any aspect of electronic media: (2) responsive essays—especially industry analysis and those reacting to issues and concerns raised by previous Feedback articles and essays; (3) scholarly papers: (4) reviews of books, video, audio, film and web resources and other instructional materials; and (5) official announcements of the BEA and news from BEA Districts and Interest Divisions. Feedback is not a peer-reviewed journal. All communication regarding business, membership questions, information about past issues of Feedback and changes of address should be sent to the Executive Director, 1771 N. Street NW, Washington D.C. 20036. SUBMISSION GUIDELINES 1. Submit an electronic version of the complete manuscript with references and charts in Microsoft Word along with graphs, audio/video and other graphic attachments to the editor. Retain a hard copy for refer- ence. 2. Please double-space the manuscript. Use the 5th edition of the American Psychological Association (APA) style manual. 3. Articles are limited to 3,000 words or less, and essays to 1,500 words or less. 4. All authors must provide the following information: name, employer, professional rank and/or title, complete mailing address, telephone and fax numbers, email address, and whether the writing has been presented at a prior venue.
    [Show full text]
  • A Parent's Guide to Religion in the Public Schools
    A Parent’s Guide to Religion in the Public Schools National PTA Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. —First Amendment United States Constitution arents are recognized as having the primary responsibility for the upbringing P of their children, including education. For this reason, parents need to be fully informed about school policies and practices, including all issues concerning religion and religious liberty in public education. The following questions and answers are intended to help parents understand the reli- gious liberty rights of students and the appropri- ate role for religion in the public school curricu- lum. A number of recent documents represent a growing consensus among many religious and educational groups about the constitutional and educational role of religion in public schools.1 This pamphlet is designed to build on these agreements and to encourage communities to find common ground when they are divided. The following questions and answers provide general information on the subject of religious expression and practices in schools. The answers are based on First Amendment religious liberty principles as currently interpreted by the courts and agreed to by a wide range of religious and educational organizations. For a more in-depth examination of the issues, parents should con- sult the guide listed at the end of this publica- tion. If parents have specific legal questions, the services of a qualified attorney should be sought.
    [Show full text]
  • You May Download the Contents of This Page Here
    FREEDOM OF SPEECH/PRESS ADVOCATES U.S. - Society of Professional Journalist (http://www.spj.org) “The Society of Professional Journalists works to improve and protect journalism. The organization is the nation’s most broad-based journalism organization, dedicated to encouraging the free practice of journalism and stimulating high standards of ethical behavior. Founded in 1909 as Sigma Delta Chi, SPJ promotes the free flow of information vital to a well-informed citizenry; works to inspire and educate the next generation of journalists; and protects First Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech and press.” - The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (http://www.rcfp.org) “For more than 40 years, the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press has provided free legal advice, resources, support and advocacy to protect the First Amendment and Freedom of Information rights of journalists working in areas where U.S. law applies, regardless of the medium in which their work appears. Funded by corporate, foundation and individual contributions, the Reporters Committee serves more than 2,000 reporters, editors and media lawyers who call for help each year, as well as the tens of thousands who use its website.” - First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University (http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org) “The center supports the First Amendment and builds understanding of its core freedoms through education, information and entertainment. The center serves as a forum for the study and exploration of free-expression issues, including freedom of speech, of the press and of religion, and the rights to assemble and to petition the government. Founded by John Seigenthaler, the First Amendment Center is an operating program of the Freedom Forum and is associated with the Newseum and the Diversity Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Lotsii-Lj- Marilyn J
    UIORLD PREOOI III IIKMIIOO1IIII111111 A Coordination Group of National and International News Media Organizations October 6, 1998 His Excellency Kofi A. Annan Secretary-General E 6 E 0 W United Nations Room 3800, United Nations Headquarters New York, NY 10017 EXECUTIVE OFFICE Dear Mr. Secretary-General, OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL to your ^ ^ week. Your topic — 'Regardless of Frontiers:' Article 19 in a World of Sovereign States — is certainly most appropriate in this 50th anniversary year of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We anticipate a packed house at the Madison Hotel, and I know that you will be pleased with the reception you find there. Enclosed please find a list of those individuals who have 'Indurated they will be with us for the luncheon and lecture. Responses continue to come in, so the list could change somewhat. To give you an idea of the schedule for this event, here is a general outline: We have invited guests for 12:30 p.m., to leave time for settling down and for a glass of wine. We can begin the program at 1 p.m. or once you've had a chance to enjoy your lunch and become comfortable. Jim Ottaway, Jr., our chairman, will introduce you briefly and will acknowledge the presence of at least four press freedom heroes ~ Doan Viet Hoat of Vietnam; Christine Anyanwu of Nigeria; Kenneth Best of Liberia and Gambia; and Yndimiro Restano of Cuba. Following your address, .if you are willing, _we w|ll entertain ^Jguesy_pns_fi;pJ]yhe_audience. And at some time during the program, if you agree, it would be wonderful if you would give your end^ement to the Char foraFreePress, whi^hjvejike to_call_an impement for putting Article 19 intojpractice.
    [Show full text]
  • Press, Power Politics
    Press, Power & Politics AFRICA MEDIA FORUM September 27-28, 2000 • Accra, Ghana Board of Trustees PRESS, POWER & POLITICS • AFRICA MEDIA FORUM Charles L. Overby, Chairman Contents Page and Chief Executive Officer Peter S. Prichard, President Ghanaian media face test in covering election 1 Harry W. Brooks Jr. Madelyn P. Jennings Government minister cautions press against ‘reckless sensationalism’ 2 Malcolm R. Kirschenbaum Bette Bao Lord Former U.S. senator urges unifying Ghanaian press Brian Mulroney 2 Jan Neuharth Will Norton Jr. Candidates field questions from press, public 3 John C. Quinn Josefina A. Salas-Porras John Seigenthaler Media scramble to cover crucial Ghanaian elections 4 Paul Simon Ghanaian cartoonists lament their professional isolation and Allen H. Neuharth, Founder vulnerability to lawsuits 6 Editorial: Maurice R. Fliess Net technology making inroads into Ghanaian journalism Rod Sandeen 6 Photos: West African editor: Journalists must cope with ‘government arrogance’ 7 Judy G. Rolfe Map: Freedom Forum opens library for journalists in Mali 8 Grant Jerding The Freedom Forum World Center 1101 Wilson Blvd. Forum in Accra, Ghana, examines coverage Arlington, VA 22209 USA Tel: 703/528-0800 of political campaigns across Africa Fax: 703/284-3529 E-mail: [email protected] The Freedom Forum continued its year- democratic constitution in 1992 set the Internet: www.freedomforum.org long series of international media forums on stage for the blossoming of independent “Press, Power & news organizations to compete against the African Center Politics” Sept. 27-28 state-owned media, which remain strong. 7TH Floor, JHI House in Accra, Ghana. Related training sessions for Ghanaian 11 Cradock Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • A Freedom Forum Report on the Peruvian Media
    A Freedom Forum report on the Peruvian media. Caracas GUYANA FRENCH GUIANA VENEZUELA (France) Bogota COLOMBIA SURINAME Quito ECUADOR PERU BRAZIL Lima La Paz BOLIVIA Pacific Ocean PARAGUAY CHILE Atlantic Ocean ARGENTINA N URUGUAY 0 250 Miles PRESS, POWER & POLITICS PERU Written by Corinne Schmidt Edited by Joan Mower CORINNE SCHMIDT is coordinator of the Latin American Studies Program at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Md., where she is also a doctoral candi- date. Previously, she was a journalist in Lima, Peru for The Washington Post and other publications. She also has served as a Foreign Service officer at the U.S. Embassies in Peru and Ecuador. She is a graduate of the College of William and Mary. JOAN MOWER is director of Africa, Latin America programs at The Freedom Forum in Arlington,Va. She joined the media foundation in 1993. Previously, she worked as a journalist for the Associated Press, based in Washington, and for United Press International in George, South Carolina and Massachusetts. She was also a Foreign Service officer. A graduate of the University of California at Berkeley, she holds a master’s degree from Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies. CONTENTS Foreword . .v Introduction . .1 History and Society . .5 Politics and Elections . .9 The Press . .12 The Chicha Press . .14 Magazines . .17 Television . .18 Radio . .22 Peruvian Media Online . .22 The Business of Media . .24 Media Organizations . .26 Journalism Education . .27 Media’s Role in Politics . .28 Media Under Threat in the Fujimori Regime . .32 Control of Information . .35 Coverage of the Presidential Campaign 2000 .
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois First Amendment Center
    Illinois First Amendment Center Typhonian Claybourne still empty: misunderstood and tetrandrous Barton scores quite growlingly but acknowledge her stigmata unsuitably. Jerald often experiments hardheadedly when acellular Tallie tubulate pushing and badger her skim. Which Ben pigeonholing so animally that Cammy remising her disbelief? Laws on public records and private emails vary greatly across the nation, and administrative decisions and court rulings also fail the draw clear lines. Others on the panel are Victor Rosario, Cathy Bennett, and Ron Sullivan, in the finale to place course taught by Lecturer on Law Lisa Kavanaugh. Hundreds of various radio stations are licensed through universities and colleges across the United States. America, and has serviced us extraordinarily well. Officer Goodman Tells Sen. You follow its history when asked about a new england first amendment center? The illinois prison libraries by other human rights at illinois first amendment center. Can first solve this chess problem of how single pawn against numerous opposing pieces? Here on can burn the Illinois Learning Standards as range as information for teachers, students and parents. There is damn great band of uncertainty concerning just what obscenity is, trump once defined, whether cap is protected by direction First Amendment. First Amendment rights are not absolute. We tried it here suffice it failed miserably. To best continue making work, degree need to allow anyone money is critical or shadow of lost Title IX reporting system will talk with us openly and freely. Why did you might include: a national program summer institute is worried about giving springfield, illinois first amendment center employees, illinois college does not waive your justice center employees from many times? That contract to imply certain rights, such as attending games, and might try out each procedure by them to behavior that right.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gannett Foundation Literacy Challenge Grants Program 1987-1990
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 350 382 CE 060 810 AUTHOR Sibbison, Virginia Hayes TITLE The Gannett Foundation Literacy Challenge Grants Program 1987-1990. Assessment Report. INSTITUTION Welfare Research, Inc., Albany, N.Y. SPONS AGENCY Freedom Forum, Reston, VA. PUB DATE 92 NOTE 170p. AVAILABLE FROMWelfare Research, Inc. (WRI),112 StateStreet, Albany, NY 12207 ($15.99). PUB TYPE Reports Evaluative/Feasibility (142) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC07 Pius Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Basic Education; *Adult Literacy; *Adult Programs; Cooperative Programs; Coordination; *Educational Innovation; Grants; Illiteracy; *Literacy Education; Nonprofit Organizations; Private Sector; Program Effectiveness; Program Evaluation; State Government; State Programs; *Statewide Planning; Success IDENTIFIERS *Gannett Foundation ABSTRACT This report describes how 20 states and Puerto Rico used $2.7 million awarded by the Gannett Foundation to buildand expand adult literacy activities in a coordinated fashion statewide. Chapter 1 presents information on development of the Literacy Challenge grants program and brief descriptions of each project, including year funded, amount of awarded funds, andsponsoring agency. Chapter 2 provides an overview of the diversity, range, and magnitude of projects' efforts. Activitiesare generally grouped under information and referral, recruitment and training,resource and system expansion, evaluations, and unique projectcomponents. Chapter 3 discusses some complex and interesting aspects ofthe initiative, with specific attention tc influencing variables: diversity of aspirations and achievementsamong the projects; real and perceived barriers; influence of unique individuals; difficulties encountered in fundraising; and issues associated with the cooperative/collaborative process. Environments within whichthe projects operated are discussed. Chapter 4groups the projects into three major categories: likely, uncertain,or unlikely survival. Chapter 5 contains recommendations to the foundationregarding grant procedures, technical assistance, and monitoring.
    [Show full text]