DOCSLIB.ORG

Position Keeper Modeling Checked By: Self Keywords: TDC, Submarine, Torpedo, World War II Checked By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Position Keeper Modeling Checked By: Self Keywords: TDC, Submarine, Torpedo, World War II Checked By Subject: TDC Author: Mathscinotes Title: Position Keeper Modeling Checked By: Self Keywords: TDC, Submarine, Torpedo, World War II Checked By: Position Keeper Modeling Abstract During World War II, all the submarines of all warring nations used analog computers to assist submarine commanders with aiming straight-running torpedoes (e.g. UK used their "fruit machine."). US submarines used a computer called the Torpedo Data Computer (TDC) that was considered the best of these devices.The Torpedo Data Computer (TDC) included a function known as Position Keeping that was a mechanical solver for a system of differential equations .This technical note compares the output from a simple Mathcad model of the Position Keeper with the output from a kinematic model for a simple test case. I solve the system of ODEs using Mathcad's standard ODE solver and a homebrew routine that may be more appropriate for people who are implementing software versions of the TDC's position keeper function. Table of Contents Update TOC Abstract Table of Contents TOC Introduction Analysis of Bearing Angle and Range Vers us Time Jump to region Simulation Approach Field of Battle Kinematic Model Differential Equation Model Euler‐Method Solution Graphical Display Standard Differential Equation Solver Conclusion Reference Introduction The model I am using here comes from following web site. http://www.hnsa.org/doc/tdc/pg011.htm See reference section for excerpt I am going to focus on the Position Keeper function of the TDC, which is made up of two coupled differential equations and two subsidiary equations. The key function of the Position Keeper is to provide estimates of the target's bearing and range. My simulation will focus on these variables, which are critical to obtaining a fire control solution , which I will not cover here. A more thorough modeling would include more complex scenarios, but this illustrates the basic approach used. Tactically, the submarine would estimate the target course, range, and speed from periscope and hydrophone readings. Position Keeper Model for the TDC 1 of 6 22-February-2012 Subject: TDC Author: Mathscinotes Title: Position Keeper Modeling Checked By: Self Keywords: TDC, Submarine, Torpedo, World War II Checked By: The TDC would put out a constantly updated position for the target, which the sub skipper would compare against further periscope readings. The TDC target model would be updated until it could accurately predict the target's motion. With the TDC, the submarine could maneuver and the TDC would keep track of the target's position relative to the submarine. This greatly improved the accuracy of the whole fire control operation. Analysis of Bearing Angle and Range Versus Time Simulation Approach I am going to work this problem assuming the simple case of a target and submarine (referred to as "Own Ship") both pursuing constant velocity courses. This will allow me to determine the exact distance and bearing numbers using a simple kinematic model and the differential equation model. This way, I can verify that my differential equation solution is reasonable. I could use the Mathcad differential equation solvers, but I decided to put together a simple solution using Euler's method (i.e. the simplest possible way). This would be easy for someone to code using any number of programming languages. Field of Battle Assume that we are going to place our submarine and target on a 1000 meter by 1000 meter grid indexed as shown in Figure 1. 1000 meters Y Axis 0 meters 0 meters X Axis 1000 meters Figure 1: Torpedo Data Computer Simulation Grid Position Keeper Model for the TDC 2 of 6 22-February-2012 Subject: TDC Author: Mathscinotes Title: Position Keeper Modeling Checked By: Self Keywords: TDC, Submarine, Torpedo, World War II Checked By: Kinematic Model I am going to work this problem assuming the simple case of a target and submarine both pursuing constant velocity courses. This will allow me to determine the exact distance and bearing numbers using a simple kinematic model and the differential equation model. Target Own Ship 10 x coordinate 900 x coordinate R m R m T0 900 y coordinateO0 10 y coordinate 10 m x component 10 m x component V V T0 10 s y componentO0 5 s y component RT()t RT0 VT0t Target Position as a function of time. RO()t RO0 VO0t Submarine Position (i.e. Own Ship) Position as a function of time. Rt() RT()t RO()t Distance between target and submarine. θ(t ) 180deg atan2 RT()t RO()t RT()t RO()t Bearing of target from 0 1 submarine. Differential Equation Model m S V 11.18 Speed of the Submarine (Own Ship) O O0 s m S V 14.142 Speed of the Target T T0 s SOsin() Br STsin() A B'() Br AR Bearing Angle Differential Equation R R'()S Br A Ocos() Br STcos() A Range Differential Equation CO atan2 VO0 VO0 180deg 26.565 deg Own Ship Course (sub knows its 0 1 course) CT atan2 VT0 VT0 180deg 225 deg Target Ship Course (sub 0 1 estimates this from periscope reading of angle on the bow) Position Keeper Model for the TDC 3 of 6 22-February-2012 Subject: TDC Author: Mathscinotes Title: Position Keeper Modeling Checked By: Self Keywords: TDC, Submarine, Torpedo, World War II Checked By: Euler-Method Solution It is a bit crude, but it appears to work. B Br dt 0.1s Algorithm time step R B θ()0 Initialize Bearing A 0 R 1259m Initialize Range 0 A B 180deg C Initialize Target Angle 0 0 T Br B C 0 0 O Initialize Relative Bearing for i 1 900 Main Loop B dt B' Br A R B Predict the Bearing i i1 i1 i1 i1 Br B C i i O Compute the Next Relative Bearing A B 180deg C i i T Compute the Next Target Angle R dt R' Br A R Compute Next Range i i i i1 B dt B' Br A R B Corrector for Bearing i i i i i1 B Br Return all the values R I needed to remove the units from the range vector (a Mathcad m 15 limitation) A Graphical Display Here is a graph comparing my kinematic model with the model from the differential equation solution. They are identical, which they should be. The nice thing about the differential equation solution is that it can handle changes in course by the submarine. These course changes were automatically fed into the TDC by the sub's gyrocompass. Position Keeper Model for the TDC 4 of 6 22-February-2012 Subject: TDC Author: Mathscinotes Title: Position Keeper Modeling Checked By: Self Keywords: TDC, Submarine, Torpedo, World War II Checked By: i 0 900 Each time increment corresponds to 0.1 seconds. Kinematic Model vs Simulated TDC Output 3 1.5 10 250 200 3 110 150 100 500 Range (meters) 50 Bearing Angle (°) 0 0 3 0 200 400 600 800 110 Time Increment (0.1 seconds) Exact Target Range (Kinematic) TDC Target Range Exact Target Bearing (Kinematic) TDC Target Bearing Standard Differential Equation Solver Mathcad has excellent ODE solvers. Here is the same problem worked using one of their ODE solver routine. T1 90 Maximum time -- the solver does not like units SO ST S S The solver does not like units O m T m s s Given S sin B() u C S sin B() u π C d O O T T Bu()= B0( )= 0.785 du Ru() d Ru()= SOcos B() u CO STcos B() u π CT R0( )= 1259 du f B Odesolve uT1900 z1 0 0.1 90 g R Position Keeper Model for the TDC 5 of 6 22-February-2012 Subject: TDC Author: Mathscinotes Title: Position Keeper Modeling Checked By: Self Keywords: TDC, Submarine, Torpedo, World War II Checked By: Solution using the Mathcad Standard Solver 1500 300 1250 250 1000 200 750 150 500 100 Range (m) 250 50 Bearing Angle (°) 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Time (sec) Range Bearing My crude solver got the same result. Conclusion This model appears to provide a reasonable example for the operation of the TDC, at least as I read it in the old manual. Reference Old Navy TDC manual excerpt Position Keeper Model for the TDC 6 of 6 22-February-2012.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction to Sonar, Navy Training Course. INSTITUTION Bureau of Naval Personnel, Washington, R
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 070 572 SE 014 119 TITLE Introduction to Sonar, Navy Training Course. INSTITUTION Bureau of Naval Personnel, Washington, R. C.-; Naval Personnel Program Support Activity, Washington, D. C. REPORT NO NAVPERS -10130 -B PUB DATE 68 NOTE 186p.; Revised 1968 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS *Acoustics; Instructional Materials; *Job Training; *Military Personnel; Military Science; Military Training; Physics; *Post Secondary Education; *Supplementary Textbooks ABSTRACT Fundamentals of sonar systems are presented in this book, prepared for both regular navy and naval reserve personnel who are seeking advancement in rating. An introductory description is first made of submarines and antisubmarine units. Determination of underwater targets is analyzed from the background of true and relative bearings, true and relative motion, and computation of target angles. Then, applications of both active and passive sonars are explained in connection with bathythesmographs, fathometers, tape recorders, fire control techniques, tfiternal and external communications systems, maintenance actions, test methods and equipment, and safety precautions. Basic principles of sound and temperature effects on wave propagation are also discussed. Illustrations for explanation use, information on training films and the sonar technician rating structure are also provided.. (CC) -^' U.S DEPARTMENT OFHEALTH. EDUCATION 14 WELFARE OFFICE OF EOUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HASBEEN REPRO OUCED EXACTLY ASRECEIVED FROM THE PERSON ORORGANIZATION ORIG INATING IT POINTS OFVIEW OR OPIN IONS STATED 00NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICEDF EDU CATION POSITION ORPOLICY 1-1:1444646- 1 a 7 ero AIM '440, a 40 ;13" : PREFACE. This book is written for themen of the U. S. Navy and Naval Reserve who are seeking advancement in theSonar Technician rating.
    [Show full text]
  • The Submarine Simulation
    THE SUBMARINE SIMULATION INTRODUCTION Silent Service is a detailed simulation of World War II submarine missions in the Pacific. It places you into the role of submarine captain and presents you with the same information, problems and resources available to an actual sub captain. Included are numerous scenarios, options and play variations. Five detailed battle station screens, numerous commands, and realistic graphics and sound effects combine to provide a dramatic level of realism and playability. As is detailed later, US submarines played a crucial role in stemming the tide of Japanese imperialism and winning the war in the Pacific. The primary mission of the American Silent Service was to take on the Japanese Navy in their home waters and to neutralise the Japanese Merchant Marine. As submarine commander in this elite force, you will be evaluated based on the number and types of ship which you sink. The first group of scenarios recreate actual historical situations and require a variety of different tactics. They are useful for becoming acquainted with the mechanics of this simulation, practising specific situations, or for quick games. The real test of a submariner's skill however, are are the Patrol scenarios. Here you will encounter an almost infinite variety of situations as you seek out and attack enemy convoys. With a limited number of torpedoes and fuel, your goal is to sink a maximum tonnage of enemy shipping and bring your sub successfully back to base. As an accurate simulation of a real life-situation, there are numerous details, subtleties and features included in the simulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Shokaku Class, Zuikaku, Soryu, Hiryu
    ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF KOJINSHA No.6 ‘WARSHIPS OF THE IMPERIAL JAPANESE NAVY’ SHOKAKU CLASS SORYU HIRYU UNRYU CLASS TAIHO Translators: - Sander Kingsepp Hiroyuki Yamanouchi Yutaka Iwasaki Katsuhiro Uchida Quinn Bracken Translation produced by Allan Parry CONTACT: - [email protected] Special thanks to my good friend Sander Kingsepp for his commitment, support and invaluable translation and editing skills. Thanks also to Jon Parshall for his work on the drafting of this translation. CONTENTS Pages 2 – 68. Translation of Kojinsha publication. Page 69. APPENDIX 1. IJN TAIHO: Tabular Record of Movement" reprinted by permission of the Author, Colonel Robert D. Hackett, USAF (Ret). Copyright 1997-2001. Page 73. APPENDIX 2. IJN aircraft mentioned in the text. By Sander Kingsepp. Page 2. SHOKAKU CLASS The origin of the ships names. Sho-kaku translates as 'Flying Crane'. During the Pacific War, this powerful aircraft carrier and her name became famous throughout the conflict. However, SHOKAKU was actually the third ship given this name which literally means "the crane which floats in the sky" - an appropriate name for an aircraft perhaps, but hardly for the carrier herself! Zui-kaku. In Japan, the crane ('kaku') has been regarded as a lucky bird since ancient times. 'Zui' actually means 'very lucky' or 'auspicious'. ZUIKAKU participated in all major battles except for Midway, being the most active of all IJN carriers. Page 3. 23 August 1941. A near beam photo of SHOKAKU taken at Yokosuka, two weeks after her completion on 8 August. This is one of the few pictures showing her entire length from this side, which was almost 260m.
    [Show full text]
  • HR.10240 Nvg118covuk
    OSPREY New Vanguard PUBLISHING US Submarines 1941–45 Jim Christley • Illustrated by Tony Bryan © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com New Vanguard • 118 US Submarines 1941–45 Jim Christley • Illustrated by Tony Bryan © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com US SUBMARINES 1941–45 INTRODUCTION he shooting portion of World War II burst on the American Navy early on a Sunday morning in December 1941, with the Japanese Tattack on Pearl Harbor. On that morning the face of naval warfare in the Pacific changed utterly. No longer would the war at sea be decided by squadrons of the world’s largest and most powerful battleships. Instead, the strategic emphasis shifted to a combination of two more lethal and far-ranging naval weapon systems. The aircraft carrier would replace the battleship by being able to increase the deadly range of a fleet from a few tens of miles – the range of battleship guns – to the hundreds of miles range of bomb- and torpedo-carrying aircraft. In addition, the American submarine would be able to place a strangler’s grip on the throat of the Japanese empire that, unlike the German U-boats’ attempts to control the Atlantic waters, could not be broken. Some have said that the result of the attack at Pearl Harbor was fortuitous in that it forced the US Navy to look toward the carrier and submarine to defend the southern Pacific and the United States’ western coast. This argument overlooks, however, the prewar build-up in those two weapons platforms, which seems to indicate that some individuals were looking seriously toward the future and the inevitable conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Fleet, It Is the Atlantic
    The Battle of the Atlantic On September 1, 1939 Germany invades Poland. Allies or go on the offensive with deadly submarine Two days later Britain and France declare war and wolf packs and surface raiders of the German the Battle of the Atlantic begins. Over the next five Kriegsmarine. years and eight months a deadly struggle would be fought on the high seas, from the frigid waters "The Battle of the Atlantic was the dominating of the Arctic to the South Atlantic. factor all through the war. Never for one moment could we forget that everything happening At the heart of the conflict was the tonnage war. elsewhere, on land, at sea or in the air depended Britain required a continuous supply of imported ultimately on its outcome." - Winston Churchill war materials to keep on fighting and the Kriegsmarine (German Navy) was tasked with Getting Started preventing the arrival of these goods from across If this is your first time playing Atlantic Fleet, it is the Atlantic. recommended to begin by completing the Training Missions. To do so, simply select Training Missions Atlantic Fleet from the main menu. Atlantic Fleet is a turn-based tactical and strategic simulation of the Battle of the Atlantic. Take Continue with some Single Battles to get a feel for command of surface ships, submarines as well as combat and gunnery. The Battle of the River Plate carrier and land based aircraft in a deadly struggle and Convoy HX-106 battles (playing Germany for for control of shipping lanes during World War II. both) make for excellent initial practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Analog Computer - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia 10-3-13 下午3:11
    Analog computer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 10-3-13 下午3:11 Analog computer From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia An analog computer (spelled analogue in British English) is a form of computer that uses the continuously-changeable aspects of physical phenomena such as electrical,[1] mechanical, or hydraulic quantities to model the problem being solved. In contrast, digital computers represent varying quantities incrementally, as their numerical values change. Mechanical analog computers were very important in gun fire control in World War II and the Korean War; they were made in significant numbers. In particular, development of transistors made electronic analog computers practical, and before digital computers had developed sufficiently, they were commonly used in science and industry. Analog computers can have a very wide range of complexity. Slide rules and nomographs are the simplest, while naval gun fire control computers and large hybrid digital/analogue computers were among A page from the Bombardier's the most complicated. Digital computers have a certain minimum Information File (BIF) that describes (and relatively great) degree of complexity that is far greater than the components and controls of the that of the simpler analog computers. This complexity is required to Norden bombsight. The Norden execute their stored programs, and in many instances for creating bombsight was a highly sophisticated optical/mechanical output that is directly suited to human use. analog computer used by the United States Army Air Force during World Setting up an analog computer required scale factors to be chosen, War II, the Korean War, and the along with initial conditions – that is, starting values.
    [Show full text]
  • Index to Series of Taped Interviews with Captain Slade D
    Index to Series of Taped Interviews with Captain Slade D. Cutter, USN (Ret.) Air Forces See Army Air Forces Albacore, USS (AGSS-569) Aggressive commanding officer puts this innovative submarine through her paces in the mid-1950s, pp. 398-399 Anderson, Robert H. Favorable assessment as Secretary of the Navy in the mid- 1950s, p. 575 Anti-Semitism Jewish submarine officer manages to mediate his commanding officer's negative attitudes in the early 1940s, pp. 68, 74 Antisubmarine Warfare (ASW) Japanese capabilities in World War II, pp. 160, 215-216; Reguin (SS-481) used as target for ASW school in Key West in 1946, p. 315; Nautilus (SSN-571) able to confound U.S. destroyer during exercise in mid-1950s, p. 395; ASW exercise in 1950s marred by destroyer skipper in hurry to reach port, pp. 402-404; Seahorse (SS-304) draws ASW attention so Saipan beaches can be surveyed for 1944 invasion, p. 531 Archerfish, USS (SS-311) Credited with most Japanese tonnage sunk in a single patrol for hit on Japanese carrier in November 1944, p. 277 Army Air Forces Mistakenly pursue USS Seahorse (SS-304) with B-24s during World War II, pp. 216-218,, 550-551; angers Navy commander of Midway Island with allegations after June 1942 action, p. 248; search planes needed Navy navigators to get back to Midway, pp. 248-249; mistakenly report having bombed Saipan, pp. 286- 287 Army-Navy Football Game 1926, p. 19; 1934, pp. 12, 78-82; 1981, pp. 82, 4 81-4 82; importance to coach's stature, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • UBOOT Tactical Guide
    1 1. Introduction ingly tough technological struggle between the U-Boot- • Historical background waffe and the Allied force. • Type VII C U-boat The Type VII C U-boat 2. Getting Started The U-boat that you will be serving on in the game is the • Transit iconic Type VIIC – the workhorse of the German U-boat • Strategic navigation force. Fast and nimble, it was the type of submarine that • Propulsion sank the most Allied shipping, was produced in larger • Batteries numbers than any other U-boat, and also sustained the highest losses during the war. It was a medium range sub- 3. Contacts marine, and it operated primarily in the North Sea and • Detecting the North Atlantic. It carried 14 torpedoes, an 88mm na- • Identifying val gun, as well as a 20 mm anti-aircraft cannon. • Attack considerations What many people find surprising at first, is that the VII C 4. Facing escort vessels was more of a submersible, than a true submarine in the • On the surface modern sense of the term. It could stay underwater for • When submerged a maximum of 18-20 hours, and then it had to recharge its batteries while on the surface. Furthermore, it was only 5. Dealing with air patrols half as fast under the surface as it was on it. What it meant • remaining on the surface was that it stalked its prey primarily on the surface (while • diving running on Diesel engines) and dived only to approach targets stealthily, or when threatened by escort vessels. 6. How to play as • The Captain The U-boat was no match for convoy escorts in a surface • The First Officer exchange of fire and was forced to dive to avoid certain • The Navigator obliteration.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form 1
    NPS Form 10-900 War in the Pacific Ship Study OMB No. 1024-0018 <M2) Federal Agency Nomination £»p. 10-31-84 United States Department off the Interior National pant service For NPS UM only National Register of Historic Places received Inventory Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections 1. Name historic USS Silversi des (SS 236) and or common 2. Location street & number South Side of Navy Pier __ not for publication city, town Chicago vicinity of state Illinois code 17 county Cook code 031 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use __ dietrict __ public X. occupied __ agriculture X museum __ building(s) J(__ private __ unoccupied __ commercial park __ structure __ both __ work in progress __ educational __ private residence . site Public Acquisition Accessible __ entertainment __ religious _JL object __ in process Ji_ yes: restricted __ government __ scientific __ being considered __ yes: unrestricted __ industrial transportation __ no __ military __ other: 4. Owner of Property name Great Lakes Naval and Maritime Museum street & number P.O. Box A-3785 city, town Chicago __ vicinity of state Illinois 5. Location off Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Department of the Navy street & number Naval Sea Systems Command city, town Washington state DC 20363 6. Representation in Existing Surveys National Register Inventory Form has this property been determined eligible? -no date October 18. 1972 federal _%_ state __ county __ local depository for survey records National Park Sejrvice, city, town Wa s h i n g to n______ ________ state DC 20013-7127 7.
    [Show full text]
  • U-505: Manual for Instructors
    MANUAL FOR INSTRUCTORS NAVIGATE EXPLORE COMMUNICATE Prepared by MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY PERSONNEL WWW.MSICHICAGO.ORG 2 How to USE THIS GUIDE Upon completion of the NAVIGATE: BEFORE YOUR VISIT full “U-505 Manual for Instructors,” your students Before introducing the U-505 material to your students, please take will meet the following the time to read the background information about the U-505 and the standards: glossary of submarine terms. It will help you prepare for your field trip and LANGUAGE ARTS for teaching the lessons. 4A. Listen effectively in formal and informal situations. The Story of the U-505 5 Did you know? 7 5A. Locate, organize and use information from Voyage of the U-505 Map 8 various sources to answer A few definitions 9 questions, solve problems and communicate ideas. MATHEMATICS 8A. Describe numerical relationships using EXPLORE: DURING YOUR VISIT variables and patterns. Take advantage of the resources within this guide to make your field SCIENCE trip run smoothly. Please take the time to read about the exhibit, its 11A. Know and apply the educational opportunities and tips for visiting. We highly recommend concepts, principles and that students use the Surveillance Record during their visit to the U-505 processes of scientific inquiry. Submarine exhibit. This will help them to get the most out of the exhibit, 13B. Know and apply while also providing you with materials to review back in the classroom. concepts that describe the interactions between The New U-505 Experience 11 science, technology and society. Interactive Features 12 Exhibit Audio/Visual Features 13 SOCIAL STUDIES U-505 exhibit map 15 16A.
    [Show full text]
  • Submarine Report
    CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED SUBMARINE REPORT DEPTH CHARGE. BOMB, MINE. TORPEDO AND GUNFIRE DAMAGE INCLUDING LOSSES IN ACTION 7 DECEMBER 1941 TO 15 AUGUST, 1945 VOLUME I The Chief of Naval Operations d rects that this report be shown only to those persons to whom the report would be of value 1n the performance of their duties. Steps shall be taken accordingly to insure that this report w.il be seen by those persons responsible for design, con· struction and repair of naval vessels, es well as for their operation, but by no others. 71,1G4~1 Preliminary Design Branch Bureau of Ships 1 J anuary 1949 Navy Department WAR DAMAGE REPORT No. 58 Printed By U . S. Hydrographlc OH1ce CONFIDENTIAL SUBMARINE REPORT Depth Charge, Bomb, Mine, Torpedo and Gunfire Damage Including Losses in Action 7 December, 1941to15 August, 1945 1 January 1949 APPROVED C. L. BRAND Rear Admiral, USN Ass' t. Chief of Bureau for Ships CONFIDENTIAL 7.1 J04S1 (I D 1 3 5 8' :> ~ '1q v I CONTENTS ~CTION Page FOREWORD 1 II GENERAL 2 III JAPANESE ANTI-SUBMARINE WARFARE AND WEAPONS 8 Name No. Damaged by Locale Date IV PERCH 1'76 Depth Charge Java Sea 3/3/42 17 v KING FISH 234 Depth Charge Formosa 3/23/43 26 VI TUNNY 282 Depth Charge Palau Is. 8/26/43 47 VII SALMON 182 Depth Charge S. E. of Kyushu 10/30/44 61 VIII GRENADIER 210 Bomb Malaya 4/22/43 82 IX SCAMP 277 Bomb Mindanao, P.I. 4/ 7/44 89 x TANG 306 Torpedo Formosa 10/24/44 109 XI BERGALL 320 Mine Gulf of Siam 6/13/45 125 XII GRAMPUS 207 Gunfire Truk 5/17/42 131 XIII GROWLER 215 Collision New Britain 2/'7/43 137 XIV DRAGON ET 293 Grounding Kurile Is 12/15/ 44 148 xv BEHAVIOR OF UNDERWATER NON- CONTACT EXPLOSIONS 161 XVI HULL DAMAGE AND STRENGTH 177 XVII STABILITY, BUOYANCY AND FLOODING 193 XVIII SHOCK PROTECTION 203 XIX ENGINEERING NOTES 213 xx PIPING 223 XXI HABITABILITY 233 XXII SUBMARINE ESCAPE NOTES 239 XX III CONCLUSION 248 APPENDIX I BRIEFS OF DAMAGE INCURRED BY U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Visual Guide to the Us Fleet Submarines Part Four: Porpoise
    A VISUAL GUIDE TO THE U.S. FLEET SUBMARINES PART FOUR: PORPOISE CLASS 1934-1945 BY DAVID L. JOHNSTON ©2020 By 1933, a very important phase of submarine development in the United States Navy was coming to a close. The fifteen years since the end of the First World War had seen the USN focus its’ submarine design efforts on the development of the “fleet submarine”. The Navy wanted a submarine capable of running at fleet battle speeds, of being able to scout ahead of the battle line and report on the movements of the enemy, and then conduct attacks aimed at whittling down the enemy in preparation of the main battleship engagement. It was understood that the recently completed S-class boats, although much more capable than any of the preceding classes, would not be capable of filling this new role. A whole new design would be needed. Having had the opportunity to examine in detail the relatively advanced German U-boats captured at the end of the war, USN designers had come away from their examinations with several differing conclusions. Thus, as the Navy began the development of the fleet submarine in earnest in 1921 there was no solid consensus on how to achieve this goal and so the designers understandably resorted to experimentation. The result was the so-called V-boats; a “class” of nine submarines built to five distinctly different designs. None of these boats achieved the goal of the fleet submarine. They were variously too big, too small, or too radical in design. In addition, the ambition of the designers outpaced the capability of the American industrial base, which had not yet matured to the point of being able to produce such an advanced concept.
    [Show full text]