Submarine Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Submarine Report CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED SUBMARINE REPORT DEPTH CHARGE. BOMB, MINE. TORPEDO AND GUNFIRE DAMAGE INCLUDING LOSSES IN ACTION 7 DECEMBER 1941 TO 15 AUGUST, 1945 VOLUME I The Chief of Naval Operations d rects that this report be shown only to those persons to whom the report would be of value 1n the performance of their duties. Steps shall be taken accordingly to insure that this report w.il be seen by those persons responsible for design, con· struction and repair of naval vessels, es well as for their operation, but by no others. 71,1G4~1 Preliminary Design Branch Bureau of Ships 1 J anuary 1949 Navy Department WAR DAMAGE REPORT No. 58 Printed By U . S. Hydrographlc OH1ce CONFIDENTIAL SUBMARINE REPORT Depth Charge, Bomb, Mine, Torpedo and Gunfire Damage Including Losses in Action 7 December, 1941to15 August, 1945 1 January 1949 APPROVED C. L. BRAND Rear Admiral, USN Ass' t. Chief of Bureau for Ships CONFIDENTIAL 7.1 J04S1 (I D 1 3 5 8' :> ~ '1q v I CONTENTS ~CTION Page FOREWORD 1 II GENERAL 2 III JAPANESE ANTI-SUBMARINE WARFARE AND WEAPONS 8 Name No. Damaged by Locale Date IV PERCH 1'76 Depth Charge Java Sea 3/3/42 17 v KING FISH 234 Depth Charge Formosa 3/23/43 26 VI TUNNY 282 Depth Charge Palau Is. 8/26/43 47 VII SALMON 182 Depth Charge S. E. of Kyushu 10/30/44 61 VIII GRENADIER 210 Bomb Malaya 4/22/43 82 IX SCAMP 277 Bomb Mindanao, P.I. 4/ 7/44 89 x TANG 306 Torpedo Formosa 10/24/44 109 XI BERGALL 320 Mine Gulf of Siam 6/13/45 125 XII GRAMPUS 207 Gunfire Truk 5/17/42 131 XIII GROWLER 215 Collision New Britain 2/'7/43 137 XIV DRAGON ET 293 Grounding Kurile Is 12/15/ 44 148 xv BEHAVIOR OF UNDERWATER NON- CONTACT EXPLOSIONS 161 XVI HULL DAMAGE AND STRENGTH 177 XVII STABILITY, BUOYANCY AND FLOODING 193 XVIII SHOCK PROTECTION 203 XIX ENGINEERING NOTES 213 xx PIPING 223 XXI HABITABILITY 233 XXII SUBMARINE ESCAPE NOTES 239 XX III CONCLUSION 248 APPENDIX I BRIEFS OF DAMAGE INCURRED BY U.S. 250 SUBMARINES DURING WORLD WAR II. APPENDIX II TABULAR SUMMARY OF U.S. SUBMARINE 296 LOSSES DURING WORLD WAR II. APPENDIX l1I MAP COVERING AREA OF PRINCIPAL U.S. SUBMARINE OPERATIONS. CONFIDENTIAL SECTION I FOREWORD 1-1. This report is one of a series of sixty-two war damage re­ ports prepared by the Bureau covering damage received in action by vessels of the U.S . Navy during World War II. It is the only report of the entire series which deals with war damage sustained by sub­ marines. The remaining sixty-one reports cover cases of significant damage incurred by surface vessels, and include r::lany instances of torpedo damage which may be of interest to submarine personnel who desire information on the destructive effect of their principal World War II weapon, the torpedo. 1- 2. As a group, U.S. submarines have established an enviable record in combat, not only in destruction inflicted upon the enemy but also in their ability to sustain severe attacks without themselves receiving serious damage. Although the basic operational character­ istics of our submarines remained substantially unchanged throughout the war years, with the notable exceptio:i of considerably increased m:?.Ximum allowable submergence depth for the SS285 anj subsequent Classes, marked advances were achieved in practically every 0th :· aspect of submarine and submarine equipment design. Improvements in shock protection have resulted in subm:irines which are highly re­ sistant to damage short of actual destruction of their pressure hulls. 1-3. It is the purpose of this report, by presenting case histories selected from the great volume of war experience, to illustrate the behavior of U.S. fleet type submarines in service during World War II when subjected to enemy attack, and in particular, to attack by non­ contact underwater explosive charges since the Japanese anti-submarine forces employed the depth charge and bomb as their principal weapons. Cases of damage by mine, torpedo, gwlfire and collision are also in­ cluded. An effort has been made to present a comprehensive sum- m"l.tion of the effectiveness with which our submarin8s withstood attack, the materiel and design weaknesses revealed by war damage, the dam­ age control problems attendant upon flooding of intact spaces or de­ rangement of vital systems and equipment, and the corrective measures taken to reduce the vulnerability of our submarines to damage. It is hoped that the information presented here will be of value to submarine operating personnel and submarine design, repair and outfitting activities. 1-4. No attempt has been made in this report to evaluate the opera- tional arid military characteristics of our submarines in the light of war experience other than by statements of fact when such character­ istics were impaired through war damage, nor have casualties incident to normal service operations been discussed. Lessons learned through the recent CROSSROADS OPERATION, and their possible effect on sub­ marine design, have not been included. CONFIDENTl.A.L -1- ON Ot\JT1A .3ECT II GE :EFA s n CONFIDENTIAL 2-4. Commencing with the BARRACUDA Class of 1924 and con- tinuing through the end of World War II, all submarines built by the U.S. Navy, with the exception of the 800 ton-type submarines MACKEREL (SS204) and MARLIN (SS205) completed in 1941, were of the fleet type, designed for high surface speeds and capable of operating for extended periods at sea and covering great distances. The submarine war effort of the United States was dependent almost entirely upon these fleet ty1 e submarines and for this reason only the damage ex­ periences of fleet type submarines have been included in this report. 2- 5. It is pertinent to mention that only negligible war experience was gained by our submarine service during World War r.1 The evolution of the fleet type submarine during the years of peace pre­ ceding Worla War II was the result of hypothesis and experience obtained through simulated exercises rather than actual war service conditions. The operating characteristics of the fleet type submarine proved adequate to carry the war to the enemy throughout the entire Pacific area, although great distances were involved. 2- 6. U.S. submar:ne operations in the Atlantic during World War II were on a minor scale. Throughout the entire war only four enemy vessels were sunk by our submarines in the Atlantic, two of the four being Gerran submarines, and but five other enemy vessels were damaged. ~Y one U.S. submarine was damaged in the Atlantic through enemy action. In the Pacific, however, where the major portion of our submarine effort was exerted, the U.S. submarine service established an impressive record almost from the first day of our entry into the war. Unrestricted submarine warfare against Japan was ordered by the Chief of Naval Operations on 7 December 1941. With the exception of a few special missions and support operations during the Battle of Midway and the initial phases of the Solomons Campaign, submarines were employed during the first two years of the war as free agents in a campaign of attrition against enemy combatant vessels and merchiint shipping. With the inauguration of the Gilbert Islands campaign in November 1943, a gradually increasing percentage of the submarine effort was diverted to the support of fleet operations although normal offensive patrolling con­ tinued to the end of the war. The statistics of the Joint Army- Navy Assessment Committee credit U.S. submarines with the sinking of 54.6 percent of all Japanese naval and merchant vessel tonnage sunk during World War II by U.S. forces of all categories. The total of sinkings 1so far as can be determined, the first vessel credited as destroyed by submarine action in the history of the U.S. Navy was the Japanese cargo ship ATSUTASAN MARU (8 ,662 gr oss tons), sunk in World War II by SWORDFISH (SS193) on 16 December 1941, lat. 18° - 06'N., long. 109° - 44'E. (credited by the Joint Army- Navy Assessment Committee, NavExos Publication P - 468). 2submarine Oper ational History, World War II, prepared by Commander Submar ine Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet (Preliminary Issue). 3BLACKFISH (SS221), damaged by Ger man depth charge attack in the Bay of Biscay on 19 Febr uary 1943. See brief of damage in Appendix I. CONFIDENTIAL - 3- ,.. CON Fl DENTIAL credited to U.S. submarines includes 201 Japanese naval vessels with a combined tonnage (standard displacement) of 540,192 tons, 28.6 percent of all Japanese naval tonnage sunk by U.S. forces, and 1113 merchant vessels above 500 gross tons with a combined tonnage (gross) of 4, 779,902 tons, 60.4 percent of all Japanese merchant ton­ nage sunk by U.S. forces.1,2 The following numbers and types of combatant Japanese naval vessels were sunk by U.S. submarines: 1 battleship, 4 lar ge aircr aft carriers, 4 escort aircraft carriers, 3 heavy cruisers, 8 light cr uisers, 38 destroyers, 23 submarines and 100 escort, patrol or mine vessels. In addition to the 1314 naval and merchant vessels credited as sunk, appr oximately 1000 Japanese ves­ sels in all categories, with an estimated combined tonnage of over It been i.> 1 000,000 tons, were damaged by U.S. submarines. 3 has estimated that approximately 275,000 Japanese were killed as a direct result of Allied submarine operations.4 2- 7. On r December 1941 there were 46 fleet type, 2 - 800 ton- type, 37 S-type, 18 R- type and 7 0-type submarines in commis-sion in the U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Introduction to Sonar, Navy Training Course. INSTITUTION Bureau of Naval Personnel, Washington, R
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 070 572 SE 014 119 TITLE Introduction to Sonar, Navy Training Course. INSTITUTION Bureau of Naval Personnel, Washington, R. C.-; Naval Personnel Program Support Activity, Washington, D. C. REPORT NO NAVPERS -10130 -B PUB DATE 68 NOTE 186p.; Revised 1968 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS *Acoustics; Instructional Materials; *Job Training; *Military Personnel; Military Science; Military Training; Physics; *Post Secondary Education; *Supplementary Textbooks ABSTRACT Fundamentals of sonar systems are presented in this book, prepared for both regular navy and naval reserve personnel who are seeking advancement in rating. An introductory description is first made of submarines and antisubmarine units. Determination of underwater targets is analyzed from the background of true and relative bearings, true and relative motion, and computation of target angles. Then, applications of both active and passive sonars are explained in connection with bathythesmographs, fathometers, tape recorders, fire control techniques, tfiternal and external communications systems, maintenance actions, test methods and equipment, and safety precautions. Basic principles of sound and temperature effects on wave propagation are also discussed. Illustrations for explanation use, information on training films and the sonar technician rating structure are also provided.. (CC) -^' U.S DEPARTMENT OFHEALTH. EDUCATION 14 WELFARE OFFICE OF EOUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HASBEEN REPRO OUCED EXACTLY ASRECEIVED FROM THE PERSON ORORGANIZATION ORIG INATING IT POINTS OFVIEW OR OPIN IONS STATED 00NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICEDF EDU CATION POSITION ORPOLICY 1-1:1444646- 1 a 7 ero AIM '440, a 40 ;13" : PREFACE. This book is written for themen of the U. S. Navy and Naval Reserve who are seeking advancement in theSonar Technician rating.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 45 Depth-Charge Problems October 1918
    - MAY 4 19?.7 O. N. I. Publication No. 45 Most Confidential! • . • . NA VY DEPARTM.ENT OFFICE OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE OCTOBER, 1918 ) I - • WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1918 DF.f'L ~SI FiRe ~ A utll (lrll: C D lo s·t, I i __ _ _,, ____ I ----- __ ___!_ -~ DEPTH-CHARGE PROBLEMS. Lieu tenant Commander H. H . F ROST, United States Nai:y . In 0. N . I. Publicittion No. 44, " Gcrm1tn Submarine Attacks" i t wa!'; seen that Germans use four stnnd nrd torpedo shots: 1. D irect bow shot. 2. D irect s tern shot. :3_ 90° angled bow shot on parallel courses. 4. 90° angled s tern shot on opposite cow·scs. As in other pnrts of the subject of naval tactics it is neither possible nor desira.ble to lay down Jrnrd and fas t rules for the depth-ch a1-gc attack. A s tudy of a gren.t numher of actual s itua tions will r esult in th e deduction of several general principles regarding th e attack. Once these principles a.re nrnster ecl a dcpth-cha.r O'e doctrine can be_l aid _down. This c~n b_e followed in a m ajority of the :i c tua.l situations wh ich m ay b e cx;ected . I n some s1tua t1ons, how~ver, 1t will ~10t apply and th en the ('Ommn.nding o fliccr must fall h nck u pon his g encr n.l knowledge of th e suhJect and dcc1clc on the spot as to the b est m 0nsurcs to tn kc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 NROTC Leadership Award
    Captain Don Campbell 2012 NROTC Leadership Award University of Idaho If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.—John Quincy Adams Sponsored by NROTC Class of 1962 www.gemut.com September 2011 University of Idaho, NROTC Program Captain Don Campbell Award The Teacher Darwin Afdahl LCDR USN retired Donald Stiles Campbell, Jr. Aug. ‘62-Nov. ‘64, USS Topeka CLG 8, Deck Officer He was born on 10 January 1932 in Spokane, Washington and raised in Portland, Oregon and Boise, Idaho. Following Dec. ‘64-Oct. ‘65, USS Leary DD 879, 1ST LT high school graduation, he attended Boise Junior College for Nov. ‘65-Feb ‘67, US Navy Flight School, CV-20 USS Ben- one year prior to entering the U.S. Naval Academy in 1950. He nington graduated with a Bachelor’s Degree in Naval Science in 1954. Mar. ‘67-Mar. ‘69, VAQ 130, Detachment OIC (EA-1F), Upon graduation Don joined the Destroyer Fleet serving CVA-64 USS Constellation, CVA-43 USS Coral Sea in various billets for three years aboard the Long Beach-based USS James E. Keyes (DD-787). Following this tour, he attended Mar. ‘69-June ‘70 , VAQ-133, Department Head (KA-3B, the Submarine School and reported to the USS Spinax (SSR- EKA-3B), CVA-34 USS Oriskany, CVA-64 USS Constellation 489) in San Diego. This tour was followed by a succession of Sept. ‘70-Aug. ‘72,VAQ 129, Department Head (EA-6B) tours on diesel-electric submarines including the USS Volador (SS-490); USS Perch (APSS-313); USS Greenfish (SS351); USS Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenes from Aboard the Frigate HMCS Dunver, 1943-1945
    Canadian Military History Volume 10 Issue 2 Article 6 2001 Through the Camera’s Lens: Scenes from Aboard the Frigate HMCS Dunver, 1943-1945 Cliff Quince Serge Durflinger University of Ottawa, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Quince, Cliff and Durflinger, Serge "Through the Camera’s Lens: Scenes from Aboard the Frigate HMCS Dunver, 1943-1945." Canadian Military History 10, 2 (2001) This Canadian War Museum is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Quince and Durflinger: Scenes from Aboard the HMCS <em>Dunver</em> Cliff Quince and Serge Durflinger he Battle of the Atlantic was the the ship's unofficial photographer until Tlongest and most important February 1945 at which time the navy maritime campaign of the Second World granted him a formal photographer's War. Germany's large and powerful pass. This pass did not make him an submarine fleet menaced the merchant official RCN photographer, since he vessels carrying the essential supplies maintained all his shipboard duties; it upon which depended the survival of merely enabled him to take photos as Great Britain and, ultimately, the he saw fit. liberation of Western Europe. The campaign was also one of the most vicious and Born in Montreal in 1925, Cliff came by his unforgiving of the war, where little quarter was knack for photography honestly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Submarine Simulation
    THE SUBMARINE SIMULATION INTRODUCTION Silent Service is a detailed simulation of World War II submarine missions in the Pacific. It places you into the role of submarine captain and presents you with the same information, problems and resources available to an actual sub captain. Included are numerous scenarios, options and play variations. Five detailed battle station screens, numerous commands, and realistic graphics and sound effects combine to provide a dramatic level of realism and playability. As is detailed later, US submarines played a crucial role in stemming the tide of Japanese imperialism and winning the war in the Pacific. The primary mission of the American Silent Service was to take on the Japanese Navy in their home waters and to neutralise the Japanese Merchant Marine. As submarine commander in this elite force, you will be evaluated based on the number and types of ship which you sink. The first group of scenarios recreate actual historical situations and require a variety of different tactics. They are useful for becoming acquainted with the mechanics of this simulation, practising specific situations, or for quick games. The real test of a submariner's skill however, are are the Patrol scenarios. Here you will encounter an almost infinite variety of situations as you seek out and attack enemy convoys. With a limited number of torpedoes and fuel, your goal is to sink a maximum tonnage of enemy shipping and bring your sub successfully back to base. As an accurate simulation of a real life-situation, there are numerous details, subtleties and features included in the simulation.
    [Show full text]
  • WRECK DIVING™ ...Uncover the Past Magazine
    WRECK DIVING™ ...uncover the past Magazine Graf Zeppelin • La Galga • Mystery Ship • San Francisco Maru Scapa Flow • Treasure Hunting Part I • U-869 Part III • Ville de Dieppe WRECK DIVING MAGAZINE The Fate of the U-869 Reexamined Part III SanSan FranciscoFrancisco MaruMaru:: TheThe MillionMillion DollarDollar WreckWreck ofof TRUKTRUK LAGOONLAGOON Issue 19 A Quarterly Publication U-869 In In our previousour articles, we described the discovery and the long road to the identification ofU-869 off the The Fate Of New Jersey coast. We also examined the revised histories issued by the US Coast Guard Historical Center and the US Naval Historical Center, both of which claimed The U-869 the sinking was a result of a depth charge attack by two US Navy vessels in 1945. The conclusion we reached was that the attack by the destroyers was most likely Reexamined, Part on the already-wrecked U-869. If our conclusion is correct, then how did the U-869 come to be on the III bottom of the Atlantic? The Loss of the German Submarine Early Theories The most effective and successful branch of the German By John Chatterton, Richie Kohler, and John Yurga Navy in World War II was the U-boat arm. Hitler feared he would lose in a direct confrontation with the Royal Navy, so the German surface fleet largely sat idle at anchor. Meanwhile, the U-boats and their all- volunteer crews were out at sea, hunting down enemy vessels. They sank the merchant vessels delivering the Allies’ much-needed materials of war, and even were able to achieve some success against much larger enemy warships.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2010 Perch Base, USSVI Volume 16 - Issue 11 Phoenix, Arizona
    THE MONTHLY NEWSLEttER OF November 2010 PERCH BASE, USSVI Volume 16 - Issue 11 PHOENIX, ARIZONA What’s “Below Decks” in the HE REED GuiDES OUR EFFORts AS ERCH ASE MidWatch T USSVI C P B . ITEM Page # SEE THE NEXT PAGE FOR THE FULL TEXT OF OUR CREED. Full Text of the: 2 USSVI Creed Perch Base Foundation 3 Support Members Base Officers - Sailing 4 Orders Annual Veterans Day Pa- 5 rade Announcement Our Generous Sponsors 6 October 2010 - Perch Base 7 Meeting Minutes “From the Wardroom” 10 Base Commander’s mes- sage A Message from the Mem- 10 bership Chairman Chaplain’s Column 11 Binnacle List 12 Perch Base November 13 LEST WE FORGET THOSE STIll ON PATROL Birthdays What’s New Online 13 NOVEMBER ETERNAL PATROLS Shipmate-to-Shipmate 14 This Ain’t No S**t USS CORVINA (SS-226) 4 Nov 1943 82 Lost Perch Base “Octoberfest” 15 Japanese Submarine Attack off Truk “A Thank-you Note . .” 16 USS ALBACORE (SS-218) 07 Nov 1944 86 Lost Holland Club Members 17 Boats Selected for First Possible Japanese Mine between Honshu and Hokkaido, Japan 19 Female Submariners USS GROWLER (SS-215) 08 Nov 1944 85 Lost Lost Boat: 20 USS Scamp (SS-277) Possible Japanese Surface Attack in South China Sea Russian Navy’s Rocket 23 USS SCAMP (SS-277) 11 Nov 1944 83 Lost Torpedo Mailing Page 20 Japanese Surface Attack in Tokyo Bay area NEXT REGULAR MEETING USS SCULPIN (SS-191) 19 Nov 1943 12 Lost (51 POWS) 12 noon, Saturday, Nov. 13, 2010 Japanese Surface Attack off Truk American Legion Post #105 3534 W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Weird Nukes of Yesteryear
    The Cold War produced some oddball weapons. Here are three of them. The “Davy Crockett,” shown here mounted on a tripod at Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland, was the smallest nuclear warhead ever developed by the US. The Weird Nukes DOD photo end of a series of thermonuclear bombs initiated in 1950. This followed the Soviet detonation of an atomic bomb of Yesteryear in 1949, several years before Western By Norman Polmar and Robert S. Norris intelligence agencies expected such an event. y the time the Cold War reached some concern about whether they could It was the era of “bigger is better.” its height in the late 1960s, the be carried in aircraft, due to size. The The zenith of “big bombs” would be American nuclear arsenal had “Little Boy” dropped on Hiroshima seen on Oct. 30, 1961, when the Soviet grown to more than 31,000 tipped the scales at 9,700 pounds, and Union detonated (at Novaya Zemlya in Bweapons. The Army, Navy, Air Force, the “Fat Man” dropped on Nagasaki the Arctic) a thermonuclear bomb that and even the Marine Corps worked weighed 10,300 pounds. The immediate produced an explosion equivalent to to acquire weapons for the “nuclear follow-on bombs were about the same 58 megatons—the largest man-made battlefield,” whether in the air, on the size or smaller. explosion ever achieved. Soviet Premier ground, on water, or underwater. However, the development of ther- Nikita Khrushchev would later write Three of the more unusual—and in monuclear or hydrogen bombs led to in his memoirs: “It was colossal, just the end impractical—of these weapons much larger weapons, with the largest incredible! Our experts later explained were the enormous Mk 17 hydrogen US nuclear weapon being the Mk 17 to me that if you took into account the bomb, the Navy’s drone anti-submarine hydrogen bomb.
    [Show full text]
  • The August Meeting Has Been Moved to the 11Th of August to Allow
    Tri State Deck Log 906 Thompson Street Martinsburg, WV 25401 Tom Samuelson is ending his tenure as the base Treasurer at the end of this year. If you are interested in being the new Treasurer, contact Tom Samuelson or Tom Peschke. Dana Bostwick is ending his tenure as the base Secretary at the end of this year. If you are interested in being the new Secretary, contact Dana Bostwick or Tom Peschke. Do you want a painting of your Boat? Go to WWW.SUBMARINEART.COM and order a picture today. Great for an office," I love me wall”, or as a gift for a Submarine lover anywhere! “Life is simple, you’re either qualified or you’re not ” May 2013 Issue (Semper Gumby) TRI STATE BASE The Deck Log Check out the TRI-STATE BASE WEB PAGE at: http://www.ussvi-tri-statebase.org 11 May 2013 BASE COMMANDER – THOM PESCHKE/ 2 Donovan Court, Brunswick, MD 21758-9029 Ph - 301-712-5095 E-Mail address: [email protected] BASE VICE COMMANDER – DAN HULINGS/ 548 Bracken Dr, Chambersburg, PA 17201-3901 Ph - 717-263- 4826 E-Mail address: [email protected] BASE SECRETARY –DANA BOSTWICK/ 906 Thompson Street, Martinsburg, WV 25401 Ph – 240-389-7621 E-Mail address: [email protected] BASE TREASURER – TOM SAMUELSEN/69 Ranch Trail, Fairfield PA 17320 Ph 717-642-9445 E-mail address: [email protected]. BASE CHAPLAIN - ROBERT PATRICK/50 E. Fifth St. Waynesboro, PA 17268 Ph (717) 762-2015. E-mail address: [email protected]. COB (B) – DOUG SMITH/419 Shannon Ct. Frederick, MD 21701-6838 Ph (301) 788-6434.
    [Show full text]
  • ASROC with Systems
    Naval Nuclear Weapons Chapter Eight Naval Nuclear Weapons The current program to modernize and expand U.S. deployed within the Navy (see Table 8.1) include anti- Naval forces includes a wide variety of nuclear weapons submarine warfare rockets (both surface (ASROC with systems. The build-up, according to the Department of W44) and subsurface launched (SUBROC with W55)), Defense, seeks "increased and more diversified offensive anti-air missiles (TERRIER with W45), and bombs and striking power.. increased attention to air defense . depth charges (B43, B57, and B61) used by a variety of [and] improvements in anti-submarine warfare."' The aircraft and helicopters, both carrier and land based (see plan is to build-up to a "600-ship Navy" concentrating Chapters Four and Se~en).~ on "deployable battle forces." Numerous new ships will The various nuclear weapons systems that are under be built, centered around aircraft carrier battle groups, development or are being considered for tactical naval surface groups, and attack submarines. New, more capa- nuclear warfare include: ble anti-air warfare ships, such as the TICONDEROGA (CG-47) class cruiser and BURKE (DDG-51) class  A new surface-to-air missile nuclear war- destroyers, will be deployed. New nuclear weapons and head (W81) for the STANDARD-2 missile, launching systems, as well as nuclear capable aircraft soon to enter production, carrier based forces, form a major part of the program. A long-range, land-attack nuclear armed As of March 1983, the nuclear armed ships of the U.S. Sea-Launched
    [Show full text]
  • J Class Fleet Destroyer
    J CLASS FLEET DESTROYER FEATURE ARTICLE written by James Davies For KEY INFORMATION Country of Origin: Great Britain. Manufacturers: Hawthorn Leslie, John Brown, Denny, Fairfield, Swan Hunter, White, Yarrow Major Variants: J class, K class, N class, Q class, R class (new), S class (new), T class, U class, V class (new), W class (new), Z class, CA class, CH class, CO class, CR class, Weapon class Role: Fleet protection, reconnaissance, convoy escort Operated by: Royal Navy (Variants also Polish Navy, Royal Australian Navy, Royal Canadian Navy, Royal Netherlands Navy, Royal Norwegian Navy) First Laid Down: 26th August 1937 Last Completed: 12th September 1939 Units: HMS Jervis, HMS Jersey, HMS Jaguar, HMS Juno, HMS Jupiter, HMS Janus, HMS Jackal, HMS Javelin Released by ww2ships.com BRITISH DESTROYERS www.WW2Ships.com FEATURE ARTICLE J Class Fleet Destroyer © James Davies Contents CONTENTS J Class Fleet Destroyer............................................................................................................1 Key Information.......................................................................................................................1 Contents.....................................................................................................................................2 Introduction...............................................................................................................................3 Development.............................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Shokaku Class, Zuikaku, Soryu, Hiryu
    ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF KOJINSHA No.6 ‘WARSHIPS OF THE IMPERIAL JAPANESE NAVY’ SHOKAKU CLASS SORYU HIRYU UNRYU CLASS TAIHO Translators: - Sander Kingsepp Hiroyuki Yamanouchi Yutaka Iwasaki Katsuhiro Uchida Quinn Bracken Translation produced by Allan Parry CONTACT: - [email protected] Special thanks to my good friend Sander Kingsepp for his commitment, support and invaluable translation and editing skills. Thanks also to Jon Parshall for his work on the drafting of this translation. CONTENTS Pages 2 – 68. Translation of Kojinsha publication. Page 69. APPENDIX 1. IJN TAIHO: Tabular Record of Movement" reprinted by permission of the Author, Colonel Robert D. Hackett, USAF (Ret). Copyright 1997-2001. Page 73. APPENDIX 2. IJN aircraft mentioned in the text. By Sander Kingsepp. Page 2. SHOKAKU CLASS The origin of the ships names. Sho-kaku translates as 'Flying Crane'. During the Pacific War, this powerful aircraft carrier and her name became famous throughout the conflict. However, SHOKAKU was actually the third ship given this name which literally means "the crane which floats in the sky" - an appropriate name for an aircraft perhaps, but hardly for the carrier herself! Zui-kaku. In Japan, the crane ('kaku') has been regarded as a lucky bird since ancient times. 'Zui' actually means 'very lucky' or 'auspicious'. ZUIKAKU participated in all major battles except for Midway, being the most active of all IJN carriers. Page 3. 23 August 1941. A near beam photo of SHOKAKU taken at Yokosuka, two weeks after her completion on 8 August. This is one of the few pictures showing her entire length from this side, which was almost 260m.
    [Show full text]