DOCSLIB.ORG

(HRA). (2017). Draft Cultural Resources Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(HRA). (2017). Draft Cultural Resources Technical Report DRAFT FINAL Cultural Resources Technical Report Lane Transit District City of Eugene In cooperation with Lane Council of Governments Lane County Oregon Department of Transportation July 7, 2017 DRAFT FINAL Cultural Resources Technical Report MovingAhead Project Prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended 42 U.S.C. 4322 and the Federal Transit Act of 1964, as amended 49 U.S.C. 1601 et. seq. July 7, 2017 Prepared for Federal Transit Administration Lane Transit District City of Eugene Prepared by Heritage Research Associates and CH2M HILL, Inc. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information If you would like copies of this document in an alternative format – large print, Braille, cassette tape, or on computer disc – or are deaf or hard of hearing, please contact Sasha Luftig, Project Manager for the MovingAhead Project, at (541) 682-6135 or (800) 735-2900 TTY or [email protected]. Title VI Lane Transit District ensures full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by prohibiting discrimination against any person on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the provision of benefits and services resulting from its federally assisted programs and activities. For questions regarding the project’s Title VI compliance, please contact Sasha Luftig, Project Manager for the MovingAhead Project, at (541) 682-6135 or [email protected]. Blank Page Table of Contents Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Terms ....................................................................................... ix Cultural Resources Summary ................................................................................................ S-1 S.1. Affected Environment ...................................................................................................... S-2 S.1.1. Highway 99 Corridor ........................................................................................... S-5 S.1.2. River Road Corridor ............................................................................................ S-5 S.1.3. 30th Avenue to Lane Community College Corridor ............................................ S-6 S.1.4. Coburg Road Corridor ......................................................................................... S-6 S.1.5. Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard Corridor ......................................................... S-6 S.2. Environmental Consequences ......................................................................................... S-6 S.2.1. Direct and Short-Term Impacts Approach .......................................................... S-7 S.2.2. Indirect Impacts Analysis Approach .................................................................... S-8 S.2.3. Cumulative Impact Analysis Approach ............................................................... S-8 S.3. Mitigation Options ........................................................................................................... S-8 S.4. Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... S-9 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1. MovingAhead Technical Reports ..................................................................................... 1-1 1.2. Cultural Resources Technical Report and Purpose .......................................................... 1-2 1.3. Discipline Experts ............................................................................................................. 1-2 1.4. Study Background ............................................................................................................ 1-3 1.5. Screening and Evaluation of Multimodal Options ........................................................... 1-4 1.5.1. Fatal Flaw Screening ........................................................................................... 1-4 1.5.2. Level 1 Screening Evaluation .............................................................................. 1-6 1.5.3. Level 2 Alternatives Analysis ............................................................................... 1-7 1.6. Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................ 1-7 1.6.1. Purpose ............................................................................................................... 1-7 1.6.2. Need .................................................................................................................... 1-8 Lane Transit District DRAFT FINAL Cultural Resources Technical Report July 7, 2017 City of Eugene MovingAhead Project i Table of Contents (continued) 1.6.3. Goals and Objectives .......................................................................................... 1-8 1.6.4. Evaluation Criteria .............................................................................................. 1-9 2. Alternatives Considered ............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1. No-Build Alternative Transit Network ............................................................................. 2-4 2.1.1. Capital Improvements ........................................................................................ 2-4 2.1.2. Transit Operations .............................................................................................. 2-4 2.2. Enhanced Corridor Alternatives ....................................................................................... 2-6 2.3. EmX Alternatives .............................................................................................................. 2-6 2.4. Highway 99 Corridor ........................................................................................................ 2-6 2.4.1. No-Build Alternative ........................................................................................... 2-6 2.4.2. Enhanced Corridor Alternative ........................................................................... 2-7 2.4.3. EmX Alternative .................................................................................................. 2-7 2.5. River Road Corridor.......................................................................................................... 2-7 2.5.1. No-Build Alternative ........................................................................................... 2-8 2.5.2. Enhanced Corridor Alternative ........................................................................... 2-8 2.5.3. EmX Alternative .................................................................................................. 2-8 2.6. 30th Avenue to Lane Community College Corridor ......................................................... 2-9 2.6.1. No-Build Alternative ........................................................................................... 2-9 2.6.2. Enhanced Corridor Alternative ........................................................................... 2-9 2.6.3. EmX Alternative .................................................................................................. 2-9 2.7. Coburg Road Corridor .................................................................................................... 2-10 2.7.1. No-Build Alternative ......................................................................................... 2-10 2.7.2. Enhanced Corridor Alternative ......................................................................... 2-10 2.7.3. EmX Alternative ................................................................................................ 2-10 2.8. Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard Corridor .................................................................... 2-11 2.8.1. No-Build Alternative ......................................................................................... 2-11 2.8.2. Enhanced Corridor Alternative ......................................................................... 2-11 July 7, 2017 DRAFT FINAL Cultural Resources Technical Report Lane Transit District ii MovingAhead Project City of Eugene Table of Contents (continued) 3. Methods and Data ..................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2. Relevant Laws and Regulations ....................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.1. Federal ............................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.2. State .................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.2.3. Local .................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.3. Analysis Area .................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.4. Contacts and Coordination .............................................................................................. 3-4 3.5. Level 2 Alternatives Analysis ............................................................................................ 3-5 3.6. National Environmental Policy Act Compliance .............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Partial Fulfillment Of
    WATER UTILI AT'ION AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE 11ILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN by CAST" IR OLISZE "SKI A THESIS submitted to OREGON STATE COLLEGE in partialfulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE June 1954 School Graduate Committee Data thesis is presented_____________ Typed by Kate D. Humeston TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION Statement and History of the Problem........ 1 Historical Data............................. 3 Procedure Used to Explore the Data.......... 4 Organization of the Data.................... 8 II. THE WILLAMETTE RIVER WATERSHED Orientation................................. 10 Orography................................... 10 Geology................................. 11 Soil Types................................. 19 Climate ..................................... 20 Precipitation..*.,,,,,,,................... 21 Storms............'......................... 26 Physical Characteristics of the River....... 31 Physical Characteristics of the Major Tributaries............................ 32 Surface Water Supply ........................ 33 Run-off Characteristics..................... 38 Discharge Records........ 38 Ground Water Supply......................... 39 CHAPTER PAGE III. ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL UTILIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT.. .... .................... 44 Flood Characteristics ........................ 44 Flood History......... ....................... 45 Provisional Standard Project: Flood......... 45 Flood Plain......... ........................ 47 Flood Control................................ 48 Drainage............
    [Show full text]
  • Junction City Water Control District Long-Term Irrigation Water Service Contract
    Junction City Water Control District Long-Term Irrigation Water Service Contract Finding of No Significant Impact Environmental Assessment Willamette River Basin, Oregon Pacific Northwest Region PN EA 13-02 PN FONSI 13-02 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Columbia-Cascades Area Office Yakima, Washington June 2013 MISSION STATEMENTS U.S. Department of the Interior Protecting America’s Great Outdoors and Powering Our Future The Department of the Interior protects America’s natural resources and heritage, honors our cultures and tribal communities, and supplies the energy to power our future. Bureau of Reclamation The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Long-Term Irrigation Water Service Contract, Junction City Water Control District U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Columbia-Cascades Area Office PN FONSI13-02 Decision: It is my decision to authorize the Preferred Alternative, Alternative B - Long-term Water Service Contract, identified in EA No. PN-EA-13-02. Finding of No Significant Impact: Based on the analysis ofpotential environmental impacts presented in the attached Environmental Assessment, Reclamation has determined that the Preferred Alternative will have no significant effect on the human environment or natural and cultural resources. Reclamation, therefore, concludes that preparation of an Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water in the Eugene-Springfield Area, Southern Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Ground Water in the Eugene-Springfield Area, Southern Willamette Valley, Oregon GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2018 Prepared in cooperation with the Oregon State Engineer Ground Water in the Eugene-Springfield Area, Southern Willamette Valley, Oregon By F. J. FRANK GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2018 Prepared in cooperation with the Oregon State Engineer UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 72-600346 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Price: Paper cover $2.75, domestic postpaid; $2.50, GPO Bookstore Stock Number 2401-00277 CONTENTS Page Abstract ______________________ ____________ 1 Introduction _________ ____ __ ____ 2 Geohydrologic system ___________ __ _ 4 Topography _____________ ___ ____ 5 Streams and reservoirs ______ ___ _ __ _ _ 5 Ground-water system ______ _ _____ 6 Consolidated rocks __ _ _ - - _ _ 10 Unconsolidated deposits ___ _ _ 10 Older alluvium ____ _ 10 Younger alluvium __ 11 Hydrology __________________ __ __ __ 11 Climate _______________ _ 12 Precipitation ___________ __ 12 Temperature -__________ 12 Evaporation _______ 13 Surface water __________ ___ 14 Streamflow _ ____ _ _ 14 Major streams __ 14 Other streams ________ _ _ 17 Utilization of surface water _ 18 Ground water __________ _ __ ___ 18 Upland and valley-fringe areas 19 West side _________ __ 19 East side __________ ________________________ 21 South end ______________________________ 22 Central lowland ________ __ 24 Occurrence and movement of ground water 24 Relationship of streams to alluvial aquifers __ _ 25 Transmissivity and storage coefficient ___ _ 29 Ground-water storage _ __ 30 Storage capacity _ .
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Packet 7-8-19 Work Session
    EUGENE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA July 8, 2019 5:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION Harris Hall, 125 East 8th Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97401 Meeting of July 8, 2019; Her Honor Mayor Lucy Vinis Presiding Councilors Betty Taylor, President Emily Semple, Vice President Mike Clark Greg Evans Chris Pryor Claire Syrett Jennifer Yeh Alan Zelenka 5:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION Harris Hall, 125 East 8th Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97401 1. Committee Reports and Items of Interest 2. WORK SESSION: Parks and Recreation System Development Charge Methodology Update 3. WORK SESSION: Municipal Court Presiding Judge July 8, 2019, Work Session For the hearing impaired, an interpreter can be provided with 48 hours' notice prior to the meeting. Spanish-language interpretation will also be provided with 48 hours' notice. To arrange for these services, contact the receptionist at 541-682-5010. City Council meetings are telecast live on Metro Television, Comcast channel 21, and rebroadcast later in the week. El consejo de la Ciudad de Eugene agradece su interés en estos asuntos de la agenda. El lugar de la reunión tiene acceso para sillas de ruedas. Se puede proveer a un intérprete para las personas con discapacidad auditiva si avisa con 48 horas de anticipación. También se puede proveer interpretación para español si avisa con 48 horas de anticipación. Para reservar estos servicios llame al 541-682-5010. Las reuniones del consejo de la ciudad se transmiten en vivo por Metro Television, Canal 21 de Comcast y son retransmitidas durante la semana. For more information, contact the Council Coordinator at 541-682-5010 or visit us online at www.eugene-or.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Solutions for Improving Water Quality: Supporting the Development of the Amazon Creek Initiative
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE FINAL REPORT OF Kristen M. Larson for the degree of Master of Environmental Sciences in the Professional Science Master’s Program presented on June 4, 2012. Title: Stormwater Solutions for Improving Water Quality: Supporting the Development of the Amazon Creek Initiative Internship conducted at: Long Tom Watershed Council 751 South Danebo Ave. Eugene, OR 97402 Supervisor: Jason Schmidt, Urban Watershed Restoration Specialist Dates of Internship: June 13, 2011 to November 22, 2011 Abstract approved: Dr. W. Todd Jarvis The Long Tom Watershed Council (LTWC) is a non-profit organization in Eugene, Oregon that serves to protect and enhance watershed health in the Long Tom River Basin. The Amazon Creek Initiative was launched by the LTWC in 2011 as Oregon’s newest Pesticide Stewardship Partner. Goals of the initiative are to improve water quality and habitat function in Amazon Creek by encouraging voluntary retrofits of low-impact development (LID) and through outreach and education of pollution prevention practices. This internship involved a series of projects in support of the development of the Amazon Creek Initiative. Accomplishments included surface water sampling, stakeholder research, development of communication tools, creation of an LID cost calculator, site visits and assessments of pesticide retailers, and a review of national efforts to train pesticide retail staff in integrated pest management. This work supports the Amazon Creek Initiative as it moves towards implementation and provided diverse learning opportunities in non-profit and watershed council operations, communicating a scientific message, and low-impact development solutions to stormwater management. ii Stormwater Solutions for Improving Water Quality: Supporting the Development of the Amazon Creek Initiative by Kristen M.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Waterway Maintenance Plans
    Open Waterway Maintenance Plans City of Eugene Public Works Department Parks and Open Space Division 1820 Roosevelt Boulevard Eugene, OR 97402‐4159 541‐682‐4800 www.eugene‐or.gov/parks Updated in 2014 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................ I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ II BACKGROUND AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS .................................................................. 1 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................... 8 AMAZON BASIN ..................................................................................................................... 10 AMAZON HEADWATERS ............................................................................................................................................... 20 AMAZON (MARTIN STREET TO SNELL AVENUE) ................................................................................................................. 25 AMAZON (SNELL AVENUE TO FOX HOLLOW ROAD) ........................................................................................................... 30 TH AMAZON (FOX HOLLOW ROAD TO 30 AVENUE) ............................................................................................................. 34 TH TH AMAZON (30 AVENUE TO 24 AVENUE) .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Interpretation of Floodplain Deposits of the Southwestern
    Geologic Interpretation of Floodplain Deposits of the Southwestern Willamette Valley, T17SR4W With Some Implications for Restoration Management Practices Eugene, Oregon Michael James, James Geoenvironmental Services Karin Baitis, Eugene District BLM JULY 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Location 2 CHAPTER 2 WEST EUGENE GEOLOGIC BACKGROUND 9 CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 15 3.1 MAPPING 15 3.1.1Stratigraphic and Soil Investigation 15 3.1.2 Chronology of Lithologic Units: Radiocarbon Dating and Paleopedology 17 3.1.3 Summary 23 3.2 CHARACTERIZATION OF SEDIMENTS 24 3.2.1 Textural and Sedimentological Analysis 24 3.3 MINERALOGY 26 3.3.1 Soil 26 3.3.2 Tephra Analysis 32 3.3.3 Clay XRD 33 3.3.4 Summary 38 3.4 MINERAL CHEMISTRY 40 3.4.1 Microprobe and Neutron Activation Analysis 40 3.4.2 Trace Elements 48 3.4.3 Summary 52 3.5 SURFACE AND SOIL WATER CONDUCTIVITY 53 3.5.1 General Experiment Design 53 3.5.2 Amazon Creek and Area Stream Conductivities 58 3.5.3 Soil/Water Conductivity 60 3.5.4 Ion Chromatography of Soil Profiles--Paul Engelking 60 3.5.5 Summary 61 3.6 RESTORATION TREATMENT SOIL CONDUCTIVITY ANALYSES 62 3.6.1 Conductivity and Ion Chromatography 62 3.6.2 Nutrient Tests 65 3.6.3 Summary 66 CHAPTER 4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 68 4.1 Conclusions 68 4.2 Recommendations 71 REFERENCES 73 Appendix A Soil Descriptions Appendix B Soil Photographs with Descriptions Appendix C Stratigraphic Columns Appendix D Textural and Mineralogic Table Appendix E XRD Appendix F Neutron Activation Appendix G Soil and Water Conductivity Appendix H Soil Treatment Conductivity EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A three-and-one-half mile, NW-SE transect of soil auger borings was done in West Eugene from Bailey Hill Rd to Oak Knoll across parcels that make up part of the West Eugene Wetlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon Basin and Willamette River Macroinvertebrate Study, Oregon, Fall 2011
    AMAZON BASIN AND WILLAMETTE RIVER MACROINVERTEBRATE STUDY, OREGON, FALL 2011 JENA L. LEMKE AND MICHAEL B. COLE PREPARED FOR CITY OF EUGENE PUBLIC WORKS–WASTEWATER DIVISION EUGENE, OREGON PREPARED BY ABR, INC.–ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & SERVICES FOREST GROVE, OREGON AMAZON BASIN AND WILLAMETTE RIVER MACROINVERTEBRATE STUDY, OREGON, FALL 2011 FINAL REPORT Prepared for City of Eugene Public Works–Wastewater Division 410 River Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97404 Prepared by Jena L. Lemke and Michael B. Cole ABR, Inc.–Environmental Research and Services P.O. Box 249 Forest Grove, Oregon 97116 December 2011 Printed on recycled paper. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................................................iii LIST OF TABLES........................................................................................................................................iii LIST OF APPENDICES...............................................................................................................................iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................................iv INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 STUDY AREA .............................................................................................................................................. 1 METHODS...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Current TMDL Plan
    TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ………………………….…………………………………………iii 1. BACKGROUND AND TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN GOALS …………………1 2. CITY OF EUGENE …………………………………………………………………………3 a. Regional Drainage Context b. City of Eugene Organizational Structure c. Relevant Water Quality Permits and Programs d. Other Related Programs e. Regional Partnerships f. Public Involvement 3. WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................14 a. Water Quality Limited 303(d) Listings Addressed by TMDLs b. TMDL Pollutants and Potential Sources of Pollutants within the City of Eugene’s Jurisdiction 4. TMDL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ………………………………………………...19 5. PERFORMANCE MONITORING, PLAN REVIEW, REVISION, AND REPORTING …………………………………………………………………………………………....26 6. EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LAND USE REQUIREMENTS ………….…26 7. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AS INDICATED IN THE WQMP ……………….26 Figures 2-1. Willamette Region Location Map 2-2. Location Map – City of Eugene Stormwater Basins 2-3. City of Eugene Organization Chart Tables Table 2-1. Water Bodies and TMDL Pollutants Table 4-1. Temperature Strategy Elements Table 4-2. Bacteria Strategy Elements Table 4-3. Mercury Strategy Elements Table 4-4. Dissolved Oxygen Strategy Elements Table 4-5. Turbidity Strategy Elements i Appendices Appendix A: TMDL Implementation Plan Matrix (Updated 6-30-14) Appendix B: City of Eugene MS4 Permit Stormwater Management Plan (December 2012) Appendix C: Memorandum of Agreement between the State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality and City of Eugene for Administration of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 1200-A and 1700-A General Permits Appendix D-1: Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of Environmental Quality and the City of Eugene for Issuing Storm Water Permits for Construction Activities Appendix D-2: Erosion Ordinance (Eugene Code 6.625 – 6.645) Appendix D-3: Erosion Prevention and Construction Site Management Practices Administrative Order No.
    [Show full text]
  • Full LTWC Action Plan
    Long Tom Watershed Council Action Plan The Plan of Action for the work of the Long Tom Watershed Council is comprised of three main components, with different time-scales and levels of detail. Each of the three components of the LTWC Action Plan are included in their entirety in this document. 1. The Conservation Strategy has a 20+ year view, and has the most spatial explicit priorities and project types; it only covers ecological priorities (25 pgs). 2. The Strategic Plan is informed by the Conservation Strategy. It includes organizational, outreach and educational goals as well as ecological goals. This plan is revisited and reaffirmed by the Board of Directors each year during the annual work plan process. This plan was updated in 2015 (22 pgs). 3. The Strategic Plan with Leadership and Fiscal Year Work Focus is our 1-year focused work plan of action, and it includes detailed information like project names that tiers off the Strategic Plan (5 pgs). There are a few other informative plans, studies and documents, including the 10-year Action Plan for the three Model Subwatershed basins (Bear, Ferguson, and Coyote Creeks) as part of the Model Watershed Program. Long Tom Watershed Council Conservation Strategy By Dana Dedrick and Cindy Thieman Long Tom Watershed Council 751 S. Danebo Ave. Eugene, OR 97402 www.longtom.org December 2005 1 Introduction to the Conservation Strategy This Conservation Strategy is intended to be a working document. In this version, the restoration priorities for aquatic and terrestrial elements of the watershed are fully developed and spatially explicit, while the monitoring strategy is in draft stage and the Council’s approach to some issues and threats (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Eugene Hydromodification Assessment Report
    City of Eugene Hydromodification Assessment Report November 17, 2014 Submitted in accordance with the requirements of: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Discharge Permit Number 101244 (File Number 107989) City of Eugene Hydromodification Assessment Report Submitted by: City of Eugene Submitted to: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Report prepared by: Jeff Krueger Environments LLC in conjunction with the City of Eugene Submitted in accordance with the requirements of: National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Number 101244 (File Number 107989) Cover Photo: Amazon Creek in west Eugene (RaptorViews) Page ii City of Eugene Hydromodification Assessment Report – November 17, 2014 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. vii Section 1: Introduction and Background..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose and Organization ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 City of Eugene NPDES Permit History ....................................................................................................... 1 1.3 NPDES Permit Requirements for Hydromodification Report ................................................................... 2 1.4 Definitions and Assumptions ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fern Ridge Wildlife Area Management Plan
    FERN RIDGE WILDLIFE AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN March 2020 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 4034 Fairview Industrial Drive SE Salem, Oregon 97302 Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 8 Purpose of the Plan .................................................................................................... 8 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Mission and Authority ................................. 8 Purpose and Need of Fern Ridge Wildlife Area .......................................................... 8 Wildlife Area Goals and Objectives .......................................................................... 10 Wildlife Area Establishment ...................................................................................... 12 Description and Environment ................................................................................... 13 Physical Resources .................................................................................................. 13 Location ................................................................................................................ 13 Climate ................................................................................................................. 14 Topography and Soils ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]