DOCSLIB.ORG

Green Legacy Update2004/Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Green Legacy Update2004/Final The Stewardship Series Giving to nature through a personal legacy is a choice more and more people are making. Green Legacies: A Donor’s Guide for B.C. is a one-stop resource for legal, financial and other professional advisors whose clients wish to create their personal nature legacies. A Donor’s Guide for B.C. Places of not only great beauty but true ecological importance on this earth are being lost. Please join us in helping to protect these special places. —Birgit and Robert Bateman G REEN An interesting and informative compendium of tax, legal and administrative implications for potential donors, written in comprehensible English, enlivened with real life examples and accompanied by lists of donees and other useful resources. —Dennis E. Culver GREEN Sustainability has become a core value in all aspect of our lives.Whether you are a professional advisor or a donor, this guide will provide you with ways to invest and make a difference to the well being of future generations. —Milton Wong It is hard to imagine in this our 21st century that anyone would disagree with the propo- Guide for B.C. A Donor’s sition that current knowledge requires us all to place the preservation of our environment at or near the top of the priority list. But, environmental action costs money. The value of this fine book is that it lets potential donors know that they can individually afford to contribute through one or more of the well explained options. —hon. Bryan Williams, q.c. www.stewardshipcentre.bc.ca/greenlegacies WHY GREEN LEGACIES? Giving to nature through a personal legacy is a choice more and more people are making. It’s no mystery why this form of philanthropy is taking hold now. Polls con- ducted by Angus McAllister Research showed that 63% of British Columbians are “very concerned” about the environment.* In real numbers, this means that over two million people may be motivated to donate to the environment. Their gifts – whether of cash, stocks or bonds, life insurance policies, real estate, or other assets – could mean the difference between losing critical wildlife habitat or preserving our province’s precious nat- ural heritage. Their actions could also mean enriching the lives of our children and grandchildren through ongoing support for nature conservation programs. Green Legacies: A Donor’s Guide for B.C. is a one-stop resource for legal, financial and other professional advisors whose clients wish to create their per- sonal nature legacies. The guide shows how to > link client goals with advantageous planned-giving options, > discover the financial benefits of giving ecologically sensitive land and covenants, > match client interests with nature conservation programs and compatible organizations, > easily locate current contact information for organizations, and > access information on the internet (www.stewardshipcentre.bc.ca/ greenlegacies). Green Legacies is a collaborative project born of a desire to better inform peo- ple who care about the rewards of making a gift to nature in British Columbia. Leading conservationists, legal and financial advisors have combined their expertise to produce a guide that is an accessible, informative business tool. Over the next decade, millions of dollars will be donated or bequeathed to conserve threatened habitat and to restore damaged land and waterways. The need is urgent! By creating personal legacies, individuals, families and businesses can ensure support for British Columbia’s natural environment that lasts beyond a lifetime. *Poll commissioned by IMPACS (Institute for Media, Policy and Civil Society). The poll of 600 British Columbians was conducted by telephone by Angus McAllister Research between March 31 and April 10, 2001. A sample of this size has a margin of error of plus or minus 4%, 19 times out of 20. Copies of the poll are available from IMPACS at (604) 682-1953. UPDATE: May 2004 A Donor’s Guide for B.C. GREEN Since the publication of this guide in 2002, there have been some changes to the rules regarding giving to nature – this update outlines those changes. Readers are also encouraged to visit our website, www.greenlegacies.ca, for updated con- tact information for the organizations listed in the directory (pages 71 - 126 of the guide), and for additional information on related topics. Thanks for your interest in giving to nature. UPDATE UPDATE: May 2004 UPDATE: from other registered charities: 80% Since the publication of the 2004 FEDERAL BUDGET: for public foundations and 100% Green Legacies guide, there for private foundations. have been significant PROPOSED CHANGES changes that affect planned Underlying Rationale for Changes to Disbursement Quota Rules giving and charities. This Disbursement Quota Rules The changes to the disbursement quota update highlights some key The 2004 Budget announced a number rules appear to be designed to reflect changes. of significant changes regarding the more recent investment market condi- disbursement quota rules. tions and realities. The objective seems For more information, contact to be to help charities more effectively Overview of Current Disbursement the Canada Revenue Agency and preserve capital assets on a long-term Quota Rules basis and manage endowed funds/ the Federal Ministry of Finance, A registered charity must annually dis- investments for greater overall return, or visit: burse an amount at least equal to the recognizing that investment returns are CRA: www.cra-arc.gc.ca/tax/chari- total of the following: earned not only by way of interest and > 80% of tax-receipted donations ties/menu-e.html dividends, but also through price (other than endowments) received appreciation (capital gains). Ministry of Finance: www.fin.gc.ca by it in the previous year; > 80% of the proceeds from the dis- Disbursement Quota on Capital Assets position of endowments in the year; > for charitable foundations, 4.5% of Disbursement Quota Rate the fair market value of its capital The Budget reduces the 4.5% disburse- assets (such as investments) that are ment quota rate on capital assets to 3.5%. not used directly in charitable activ- This is intended to be more representa- ities or administration; tive of historical long-term real rates of > for charitable foundations, a per- return earned on the typical investment centage of amounts received by it portfolio held by a registered charity. 2 GREEN LEGACIES: A DONOR’S GUIDE FOR B.C.: UPDATE This rate will be reviewed periodi- This will apply to taxation years that requirement will be applied to transfers cally to ensure that it continues to be rep- begin after March 22, 2004. (other than specified gifts and transfers of resentative of long-term rates of return. capital endowments, as described below) This change will apply to taxation Extending the 3.5% Disbursement received by registered charitable organi- years that begin after March 22, 2004. Quota to Charitable Organizations zations in taxation years that begin after The Budget proposes that charitable March 22, 2004. Realizing Capital Gains from organizations be made subject to the Endowments 3.5% disbursement obligation on their Transfer of Endowments Registered charities typically hold capi- capital assets. With this change, all reg- Where the terms of an endowment allow tal endowments that produce invest- istered charities will be subject to the it, a registered charity may transfer prop- ment income in the form of capital same disbursement obligations on their erty received as an endowment to gains, dividends, and interest. Since an capital assets. another registered charity. However, the annual disbursement quota is applied In order to provide charitable existing income tax rules for endow- on the value of these capital endow- organizations registered before March ments provide impediments to such ments, registered charities will need to 23, 2004 with sufficient time to adjust transfers, generally because of the inter- use the investment income in order to to this new requirement, this measure action of the disbursement obligations meet their disbursement obligations. In will apply only to their taxation years on both the transferor and the transferee. some cases, the return on an invest- that begin after 2008. For charitable In order to facilitate these transfers, ment is weighted heavily in favour of organizations registered after March the Budget proposes that an endow- capital gains, rather than cash flow such 22, 2004, this measure will apply to tax- ment received by a registered charity as dividends or interest. In these cir- ation years that begin after that date. from another registered charity result in cumstances, a registered charity might the same treatment as if the endowment prefer to meet its disbursement quota had been received directly from the Transfers Between by realizing, and expending, capital Registered Charities original donor. This will be effected by gains that have accrued on endow- applying a 100% disbursement require- ments, if the terms of the gift do not ment to the transferor (which will be restrict the charity from doing this. Gifts Transferred to Charitable satisfied by the transfer), and by treating However, if the charity does so, under Organizations the endowment in the hands of the the current rules it must then meet an Currently, both charitable organiza- recipient charity as if it had been 80% disbursement obligation to the tions and charitable foundations may received directly from the original extent that the proceeds of disposition receive funds transferred from other donor. This will apply to taxation years are expended by the charity. The effect charities. These transfers may be used that begin after March 22, 2004. of the current rules is to discourage reg- to satisfy the disbursement quota of istered charities from realizing capital the transferor charity and, if the trans- Gifts Made by Way of Direct gains in order to meet disbursement fer is made to a registered charitable Designation obligations to fund charitable pro- foundation, is taken into account in grams and services.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Indigenous History in Burnaby Resource Guide
    Tsleil-Waututh community members paddling Burrard Inlet, June 18, 2014. Copyright Tsleil-Waututh Nation, Photograph by Blake Evans, 2014. Indigenous History in Burnaby Resource Guide 6501 Deer Lake Ave, Burnaby, BC V5G 3T6 | 604-297-4565 | burnabyvillagemuseum.ca 2019-06-03 The Burnaby School District is thankful to work, play and learn on the traditional territories of the hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ and Sḵwxwú7mesẖ speaking people. As we inquire into learning more about the history of these lands, we are grateful to Burnaby Village Museum for working with our host First Nation communities. The knowledge being shared in this resource guide through our local communities supports the teaching and learning happening in our classrooms. It deepens our understanding of the history of our community and will increase our collective knowledge of our host First Nations communities’ history in Burnaby. In our schools, this guide will assist in creating place-based learning opportunities that will build pride for our Indigenous learners through the sharing of this local knowledge, but also increase understanding for our non-Indigenous learners. Through this guide, we can move closer to the Truth and Reconciliation’s Call to Action 63 (i and iii): 63. We call upon the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada to maintain an annual commitment to Indigenous education issues, including: i. Developing and implementing Kindergarten to Grade Twelve curriculum and learning resources on Indigenous peoples in Canadian history, and the history and legacy of residential schools. iii. Building student capacity for intercultural understanding, empathy, and mutual respect. We would like extend thanks to Burnaby Village Museum staff for their time and efforts in creating this resource guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Building of the Coquitlam River and Port Moody Trails Researched and Written by Ralph Drew, Belcarra, BC, June 2010; Updated Dec 2012 and Dec 2013
    Early Trail Building in the New Colony of British Columbia — John Hall’s Building of the Coquitlam River and Port Moody Trails Researched and written by Ralph Drew, Belcarra, BC, June 2010; updated Dec 2012 and Dec 2013. A recent “find” of colonial correspondence in the British Columbia Archives tells a story about the construction of the Coquitlam River and Port Moody Trails between 1862 and 1864 by pioneer settler John Hall. (In 1870 Hall pre-empted 160 acres of Crown Land on Indian Arm and became Belcarra’s first European settler.) The correspondence involves a veritable “who’s who” of people in the administration in the young ‘Colony of British Columbia’. This historic account serves to highlight one of the many challenges faced by our pioneers during the period of colonial settlement in British Columbia. Sir James Douglas When the Fraser River Gold Rush began in the spring of 1858, there were only about 250 to 300 Europeans living in the Fraser Valley. The gold rush brought on the order of 30,000 miners flocking to the area in the quest for riches, many of whom came north from the California gold fields. As a result, the British Colonial office declared a new Crown colony on the mainland called ‘British Columbia’ and appointed Sir James Douglas as the first Governor. (1) The colony was first proclaimed at Fort Langley on 19th November, 1858, but in early 1859 the capital was moved to the planned settlement called ‘New Westminster’, Sir James Douglas strategically located on the northern banks of the Fraser River.
    [Show full text]
  • REGION 2 - Lower Mainland
    REGION 2 - Lower Mainland CONTACT INFORMATION Fish and Wildlife Regional Office Salmon Information: (604) 586-4400 200-10428 153 St Fisheries and Oceans Canada Surrey BC V3R 1E1 District Offices (DFO) Conservation Officer Service Chilliwack: (604) 824-3300 Please call 1-877-952-7277 for recorded Delta: (604) 666-8266 information or to make an appointment at Langley: (604) 607-4150 any of the following Field Offices: Mission: (604) 814-1055 Mission, North Vancouver, Powell River, Squamish: (604) 892-3230 Sechelt, and Squamish Steveston: (604) 664-9250 Vancouver: (604) 666-0384 RAPP Shellfish Information line: (604) 666-2828 Report All Poachers Rand Polluters Mahood L i C in hilco Conservation Officerl 24 Hour Hotline tin k na STAY UP TO DATE: li R R 1-877-952-RAPPK (7277) iver ko Canim il Check website for in-season changes or h L Please refer to page 78 for more informationC closure dates for the 2021-2023 season rapp.bc.ca g at: www.gov.bc.ca/FishingRegulations r T o Cr a D C s y e 100 Mile House 5-6 e Tatlayoko k l o s o Lake M R r C 5-5 r 5-3 C CHILKO ig B Bonaparte n LAKE r L u R R h Taseko C te o ar hk Lakes ap at 5-4 3-31 on m FR B R Ho A S Y E a R n a R la k m o d m a R e Bish rd 3-32 D op o 2-15 L R R So Carpenter uthg ate ge Lake R Brid Gold ive Cache Creek Kamloops r Bridge R Lake 1-15 2-14 Seton BUTE L INLET 3-33 Anderson Lillooet 3-17 KAMLOOPS Phillips 2-13 L G R u i a R N Arm b r c o I O T C V h L h S o ILL s E OO o R P n E T o M y a O C C H r 2-11 3-16 T Sonora N TOBA ic Island R o INLET Pemberton la n E i e R l n a t e
    [Show full text]
  • 01-16-2012 Report to Council
    5 CoQuitlam For Committee January 10, 2012 Our File: 08-3360-20/08 014000 RZ/1 Doc#: 1186937.V2 To: City Manager From: General Manager Planning and Development Subject: Maillardville Neighbourhood Plan - Progress Report For: Council-in-Commlttee Recommendation: That the Committee receive the* report dated January 10, 2012 of the General Manager Planning and Development entitled "Maillardville Neighbourhood Plan - Progress Report" for information. Report Purpose: This report provides an overview of the public comments from the December 1, 2011 Public Open House forthe Maillardville Neighbourhood Plan. Strategic Coal: This report supports the City's corporate objectives to strengthen neighbourhoods and enhance the sustainability of City services, transportation systems and infrastructure. Background: The update to the Maillardville Neighbourhood Plan, that was re-initiated in June 2011 (see Attachment 1 for further context and background), is being prepared in close consultation with area residents, property owners, businesses, builders, development community and other interest groups. As i3art of the engagement process forthe Plan, the second Public Open House was held on Thursday, December 1, 2011 at Place Maillardville from 4:00 to 8:00 pm. The event provided the public with an opportunity to re-engage with the Plan process, to review a series of display panels and to dialogue with staff regarding a variety of "Ideas and Options" for five (5) policy streams: • Housing Choices: new areas & types • Medium-Density, Multi-Family Housing: new areas & types • Heritage Preservation and Expression • Experiences in Parks and Outdoor Recreation • Nelson Creek Integrated Watershed Management Plan City of Coquitlam Page 2 January 10, 2012 Background: cont'd/ For this Maillardville Open House, staff used a number of means and methods to communicate and publicize the event, a summary of which is attached to this report (Attachment 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Fraser Valley Streams Strategic Review
    Lower Fraser Valley Streams Strategic Review Lower Fraser Valley Stream Review, Vol. 1 Fraser River Action Plan Habitat and Enhnacement Branch Fisheries and Oceans Canada 360 - 555 W. Hastings St. Vancouver, British Columbia V6B 5G3 1999 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: Lower Fraser Valley streams strategic review (Lower Fraser Valley stream reveiw : vol. 1) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-662-26167-4 Cat. no. Fs23-323/1-1997E 1. Stream conservation -- British Columbia --Fraser River Watershed. 2. Stream ecology -- British Columbia -- Fraser River Watershed. 3. Pacific salmon fisheries -- British Columbia --Fraser River Watershed. I. Precision Identification Biological Consultants. II. Fraser River Action Plan (Canada) III. Canada. Land Use Planning, Habitat and Enhancement Branch. IV. Series. QH541.5S7L681997 333.91’6216’097113 C97-980399-3 Strategic Review – Preface PREFACE The Lower Fraser Valley Streams Strategic Review provides an overview of the status and management issues on many of the salmon bearing streams in the Lower Fraser Valley. This information has been compiled to assist all concerned with Goals for Sustainable Fisheries managing and protecting this important public resource. Fisheries and Oceans Canada has This includes federal, provincial and local governments, identified seven measurable and achievable goals for sustainable community groups, and individuals. fisheries. These are as follows: While the federal government, specifically Fisheries and 1. Avoid irreversible human induced Oceans Canada, is responsible for managing fish and fish alterations to fish habitat. Alterations to fish habitat that reduce habitat (goals included in sidebar), this important public its capacity to produce fish resource is completely dependent upon land and water to populations which cannot be reversed within a human generation are to be produce and sustain its habitat base.
    [Show full text]
  • Aa Vision for a Lougheed Town Centre Neighbourhood
    Thinking Outside the Big Box: aA Vision for a Lougheed Town Centre Neighbourhood Shawn M. Natrasony Master of Arts (Planning) School of Community and Regional Planning University of British Columbia February 2009 1 Thinking Outside the Big Box: A Vision for a Lougheed Town Centre Neighbourhood by SHAWN M. NATRASONY, B.A. (Geography) Simon Fraser University, 2004 A PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS (PLANNING) in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES School of Community & Regional Planning UBC We accept this project as conforming to the required standard ………………………………………………… ………………………………………………… THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA February 2009 © Shawn M. Natrasony, 2009 ABSTRACT The City of Burnaby continues to accommodate a significant amount of growth within a limited land base. The City’s long range plans call for an increasing amount of new development to be directed into four existing town centres of higher density. Lougheed Town Centre Mall is one site with increasing promise for intensification within Burnaby’s Lougheed Town Centre. This Masters Project undertakes the development of design guidelines with the aim of informing the future redevelopment of a successful suburban shopping mall into a mixed-use neighbourhood. It envisions transforming Lougheed Town Centre Mall from a mono-centric retail focus into a sustainable urban form that is more vibrant and attractive. It begins with a review of key literature within three themes: transit-oriented development, placemaking, and green infra- structure. Reference cases of mixed-use shopping mall redevelopment are investigated to illustrate precedents in the North American context. An urban analysis describes the existing context of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Fraser, Coquitlam and Pitt River Flood Extents Coquitlam Lake Legend: Dam
    FRASER, COQUITLAM AND PITT RIVER FLOOD EXTENTS COQUITLAM LAKE LEGEND: DAM DENNETT LAKE MUNRO ISLAND BUNTZEN LAKE LAKE widgeon Slough SIWASH CYPRESS LAKE COQUITLAM FARRER COVE COQUITLAM PITT RIVER SASAMAT LAKE Plateau RIVER BELCARRA ANMORE Parkway Hazel Harper Ú[ PUMP STATION PORT MOODY Dayton BÍ FLOOD BOX Robson Hockaday Princeton Quarry Existing Dikes Collins Panorama CoastMeridian David Pitt River Flood Extent Gabriola Delahaye David BÍ Fraser and Coquitlam River Flood Extent Pinewood Burke Village BURRARD INLET Walton CREEK Nestor Erskine Gislason CITY BOUNDARY Lansdowne Pipeline Dunkirk LAFARGE Soball Johnson LAKE Ozada Victoria Guildford Pinetree McLEAN Shaughnessy Inlet Glen DEBOVILLE SLOUGH GOOSE BAR Oxford Ú[BÍ Lincoln Falcon Barnet Barnet Dewdney Trunk Lougheed Moray Thermal Lougheed RIVER Westwood Robinson North BÍ Gatensbury Clarke Como Lake ComoÚ[ Lake PITT RIVER Ú[ COQUITLAM PORT COQUITLAM COMO LAKE Porter MUNDY LAKE Schoolhouse LOST Foster Foster LAKE Chilko . Whiting Linton BlueMountain Lougheed 0 375 750 1,500 2,250 3,000 North Pitt River BURNABY Gatensbury Metres Austin Mariner Hickey Westview Rochester Decaire Riverview Disclaimer: This is intended for reference only. It is not a legal Lougheed Laurentian document. If any contradiction exists between this document Marmont Lougheed Highway #1 BÍ RIVER and the relevant city Bylaws, Codes, or Policies, the Bylaws, Mundy Alderson Leclair Highway Codes or Policies shall be the legal authority. King Edward BRUNETTE RIVER Lougheed BÍ Schoolhouse Date Created: June, 2016 Brunette Lougheed BÍ Highway #1 Map Projection: UTM NAD1983 Cape Horn NEW Prepared By: Engineering and Public Works BÍ COQUITLAM Source: City of Coquitlam WESTMINSTER BÍ United Mary Hill By-Pass BÍ Ú[BÍBÍ TREE ISLAND FRASER RIVER DOUGLAS ISLAND CITY BANK K:\gis\ops\Projects\Dennis\Fraser, Coquitlam& Pitt riverFloodplain Mapping\Fraser Coquitlam & Pitt RiverFlood Extents 11x17.mxd.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals of City of Vancouver
    MAMMALS OF VANCOUVER AND POINT GREY Summary of Historical and Current Occurrence Records Nick Page, Raincoast Applied Ecology, 2012 Scientific Name Common Name Presence Notes and Comments Historical Current DEER AND ELK Cervus canadensis roosevelti Roosevelt Elk P NP Extirpated from the Vancouver area over 100 years ago; recorded from early Vancouver in swamps and grassy wetlands including Kitsilano, Douglas Park, and False Creek flats (Matthews, 2011); elk hunting increased with expanding local population in the 1880s resulting in extirpation; in the middle to late 1800s "Chief Capilano got thirteen in one day at the head of False Creek, and shipped their carcasses to Victoria" (Matthews, 2011). Odocoileus hemionus Columbian Black- P NP Extirpated from Vancouver and Point Grey; rare migrants from Burnaby or North columbianus tailed Deer Vancouver (“residents of East Van’s Cedar Cottage neighbourhood found an adult deer trapped in a fenced-in construction site” (no date: Dunphy, 2009)); an informant recorded by Matthews (2011) in 1931 stated “Father shot deer on Little Mountain [now Queen Elizabeth Park] in 1912”; deer appear to have been extirpated from Point Grey in the 1980s; Newell (1983) noted: “there are anecdotal accounts of deer and deer sign on the endowment lands particularly along 16th Avenue”; “According to longtime Fraserview residents, the last fawn born in Fraserview was attacked and killed by dogs in the mid 1970s (Urbantreefrog Blog, 2011). CARNIVORES Canis latrans Coyote NP? P Present throughout Vancouver and Point Grey; Coyotes have expanded into Vancouver relatively recently from Lower Fraser Valley: "Coyotes first arrived in the City of Vancouver in the 1980s although they had been in the surrounding areas since the 1930s" (SPES, 2010); Merilees (1988) stated that “coyotes were originally present [in Stanley Park], then disappeared, and now have again become resident”, although this is unconfirmed; Cowan (1930) did not record them from Point Grey in the 1920s.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment and Parks Committee
    NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING ENVIRONMENT AND PARKS COMMITTEE 12:30 p.m. Tuesday, September 11, 2012 2nd Floor Boardroom, 4330 Kingsway, Burnaby, British Columbia. A G E N D A Note: Recommendation is shown under each item, where applicable. 1. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 1.1 September 11, 2012 Regular Meeting Agenda That the Environment and Parks Committee adopt the agenda for its regular meeting scheduled for September 11, 2012 as circulated. 2. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES 2.1 July 4, 2012 Regular Meeting Minutes That the Environment and Parks Committee adopt the minutes of its regular meeting held July 4, 2012 as circulated. 3. DELEGATIONS 3.1 Judy Williams and Cécile Bruyninckx Wreck Beach Preservation Society Subject: Gas emissions by motorized boats and jet skis - Personal Water Craft (PWC) in the swimming area at the Trail 6 Section of Wreck Beach 4. INVITED PRESENTATIONS No items presented. 5. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEE OR STAFF 5.1 Invasive Species Council of Metro Vancouver Funding Request Designated Speakers: Heather McNell, Division Manager Alison Evely, Natural Resource Management Specialist Metropolitan Planning, Environment and Parks Department That the Board approve a one-time $40,000 capacity building grant to the Invasive Species Council of Metro Vancouver (ISCMV) to facilitate the development of a regional invasive species strategy. August 27, 2012 EP 120911 - 1 - 5.2 Western Economic Diversification Canada Community Infrastructure Improvement Fund Application Designated Speaker: Tom McComb, West Area Acting Manager Metropolitan Planning, Environment and Parks Department That the Board authorize a grant application in the amount of $250,000 to the Western Economic Diversification Canada Community Infrastructure Improvement Fund for Camp Capilano rehabilitation project in Capilano River Regional Park.
    [Show full text]
  • REGION 2 - Lower Mainland the Management Unit Boundaries Indicated on the Map Below Are Shown Only As a Reference to Help Anglers Locate Waters in the Region
    REGION 2 - Lower Mainland The Management Unit boundaries indiCated on the map below are shown only as a referenCe to help anglers loCate waters in the region. For more preCise Management Unit boundaries, please Consult one of the CommerCial Recreational Atlases available for B.C. FOR SALMON INFORMATION Fisheries and Oceans Canada District Offices (DFO) Chilliwack: (604) 824-3300 Delta: (604) 666-8266 Fish and Wildlife Regional Office R.A.P.P. Langley: (604) 607-4150 (604) 586-4400 Report All Poachers and Polluters Mission: (604) 814-1055 200-10428 153 St Conservation Officer 24 Hour Hotline Squamish (604) 892-3230 Surrey BC V3R 1E1 1-877-952-RAPP (7277) Steveston (604) 664-9250 Cellular Dial #7277 Vancouver (604) 666-0384 Fraser Valley Trout Hatchery Please refer to page 94 for more information Shellfish Information line: (604) 666-2828 (604) 504-4709 www.rapp.bc.ca 34345 Vye Rd Exotic Alert: Atlantic Salmon Abbotsford BC V2S 7P6 Please refer to the salmon section, p. 4 Conservation Officer Service REGION 2 Please call 1-877-952-7277 for reCorded information or to make an appointment at any of the following Field Offices: ChilliwaCk, Maple Ridge, North VanCouver, C r T r a D Powell River, Sechelt, C Surrey and Squamish s y e 5-6 k 100 Mile House e Tatlayoko l o s o Lake r M R C 5-5 5-3 Cr CHILKO ig B Bonaparte n LAKE r L u R R h Taseko C te o ar hk 5-4 Lakes 3-31 ap at on m FR B R Ho A S Y E a R n l a R a k m o d m a 3-32 R e Bish rd D 2-15 op o L R R So Carpenter uthg ate ge Lake R Brid Gold ive Cache Creek Kamloops r 1-15 2-14 Bridge
    [Show full text]
  • BRUNETTE CREEK NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Final Report
    THE CITY OF NEW WESTMINSTER BRUNETTE CREEK NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Final Report Prepared by: Gartner Lee Limited Engineering and In Association with: Planning Consultants G.D. Hamilton Associates Limited and Ian Chang Consulting Planner THE CITY OF NEW WESTMINSTER Brunette Creek Neighbourhood Planning Study Environmental Review ISO 9001 Registered Quality Assured This Study consists of three reports under separate covers: Gartner Lee Limited Engineering and Planning Consultants In Association with: 9th Floor 1199 West Hastings G.D. Hamilton Associates Vancouver Consulting Ltd. British Columbia Canada V6E 3T5 and Telephone: 604 / 684 4488 Facsimile: 604 / 684 5908 Ian Chang email [email protected] Consulting Planner www.gdhamilton.com October 2001 GLL 20751 BRUNETTE CREEK NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW – FINAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background.................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Objectives ............................................................................................................ 1 2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................2 3.0 STUDY FINDINGS.............................................................................................................4 3.1 Contaminated Sites.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Street Name Derivation Notes Location Currently in Use Appeared
    Street Name Derivation Notes Location Currently In Use Appeared Possibly named for George Adams, early Adams Street Victory Heights No 1892 businessman and Councillor Named after Agnes, the daughter of Governor Agnes Street Downtown Yes 1859 - 1863 Douglas Named for Prince Albert, husband of Queen Albert Crescent Downtown No 1859 - 1863 Victoria Victory Heights, Alberta Street Named for the province of Alberta Yes 1892 Sapperton Alder Street Named for the alder tree Glenbrooke North No 1900 Named for Alexander Ewen, Councillor, who lived Alexander Street Now Alexander Street Downtown Yes 1892 on the street. now part of Columbia Alfred Terrace Named for Prince Alfred, son of Queen Victoria Downtown No 1859 - 1863 Street Named for Alice Gardens which were named for Alice Street #1 Downtown Yes 1892 Princess Alice, daughter of Queen Victoria Named for Alice Gardens which were named for Alice Street #2 West End No 1913 Princess Alice, daughter of Queen Victoria Possibly named for Thomas Allen, a teamster and Allen Street Sapperton Yes 1909 contractor who lived in the area. Allison Place Named for A.J. Allison, Councillor Victory Heights Yes 1973 Amess Street Sapperton Yes 1909 Anne Street now Ash Street Uptown No pre 1913 Anthony Court Named for Pete Anthony, lacrosse player Queen's Park Yes 1995 Arbutus Street Named for the arbutus tree Queen's Park Yes 1909 Archer Street Named for Samuel Archer, Royal Engineer Victory Heights Yes 1909 Named for Thomas Argyle, R.E., gunsmith and Argyle Street Glenbrooke North No 1909 blacksmith Street Name Derivation Notes Location Currently In Use Appeared Named for W.J.
    [Show full text]