DOCSLIB.ORG

Eighth International Workers' Sports Festival Albena, Bulgaria 9-13

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eighth International Workers' Sports Festival Albena, Bulgaria 9-13 Eighth International Workers’ Sports Festival Albena, Bulgaria 9-13 June, 2010 Complex ranking by nations 1. NPP KOZLODUY (BULGARIA) 115 pts. 2. "АТОМ-SPORT" (RUSSIA) 87 pts. 3. BELARUS WORKERS' UNION (BELARUS) 42 pts. 4. S.P.K. (ISRAEL) 33 pts. 5. BOCCE FEDERATION (TURKEY) 21 pts. BEOGRAD ELEKTRANE (SERBIA) 21 pts. Complex ranking for the Cup of CITUB 1. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM OPERATOR 44 pts. 2. MARITSA EAST 2 TPP 42 pts. 3. SHUMEN MUNICIPALITY 35 pts. 4. CFST "NPP BELENE" 16 pts. 5. VARNA MUNICIPALITY 12 pts. 6. ASAREL MEDET PLC PANAGYURISHTE 10 pts. Final standing Mini football – men Team Country p. 1. BANK DISCOUNT 3 ISRAEL 7 2. BEOGRAD ELEKTRANE SERBIA 5 3. BELARUS WORKERS’ UNION BELARUS 4 4. ASAREL MEDET PLC - PANAGYURISHTE BULGARIA 3 5. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 2 6. MARITSA EAST 2 TPP BULGARIA 1 Final standing Mini Football - women Team Country p. 1. VARNA MUNICIPALITY BULGARIA 7 2. SHUMEN MUNICIPALITY BULGARIA 5 3. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 4 Final standing Beach football – men Team Country p. 1. R.A.T. BUCHAREST ROMANIA 7 2. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 5 3. HEATING INSTALLATIONS LTD PERNIK BULGARIA 4 4. SHUMEN MUNICIPALITY BULGARIA 3 5. NIKOLA KOZLEVO MUNICIPALITY BULGARIA 2 6. HOLY BISHOPRIC OF VARNA AND VELIKI PRESLAV BULGARIA 1 Final standing Beach volleyball – men Team Country p. 1. DIAL BUHOVO BULGARIA 7 2. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 5 3. „ATOM-SPORT” RUSSIA 4 4. BELARUS WORKERS’ UNION BELARUS 3 5. ZALGIRIS LITHUANIA 2 6. INDEPENDENT TRADE UNION OF KOSOVO KOSOVO 1 Final standing Beach volleyball – women Team Country p. 1. „ATOM-SPORT” RUSSIA 7 2. KOLCHOZ BY THE NAME OF C.2 SHAUMYAN RUSSIA 5 3. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 4 4. DOBROTITSA DOBRICH BULGARIA 3 5. SHUMEN MUNICIPALITY BULGARIA 2 Final standing Volleyball – men Team Country p. 1. BEOGRAD ELEKTRANE SERBIA 7 2. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 5 3. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM OPERATOR BULGARIA 4 4. BANK DISCOUNT ISRAEL 3 5. SIEMENS LTD. BULGARIA 2 6. BEN GOURION AIRPORT ISRAEL 1 Final standing Volleyball – women Team Country p. 1. KOLCHOZ BY THE NAME OF C.2 SHAUMYAN RUSSIA 7 2. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 5 Final standing Bowling – mixed teams Team Country p. 1. ELECTRICA SPORTS CLUB ROMANIA 7 2. HILTON HOTEL TEL AVIV ISRAEL 5 3. HAPOEL KAMAG ISRAEL 4 4. SIEMENS LTD. BULGARIA 3 5. S.L.I. ENERGIA ROMANIA 2 6. MINISTRY OF DEFENSE ISRAEL 1 Final standing Tennis – men Team Country p. 1. BABANOVI LTD – ST. ZAGORA BULGARIA 7 2. VARNA MUNICIPALITY BULGARIA 5 3. MARITSA EAST 2 TPP BULGARIA 4 4. LESO INVEST 2 BULGARIA 3 5. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 2 6. „ATOM-SPORT” RUSSIA 1 Final standing Tennis – women Team Country p. 1. ASKOE AUSTRIA 7 2. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 5 3. DAGA PLUS LTD BULGARIA 4 Final standing Table tennis – men Team Country p. 1. WORKERS’ CENTRE FOR INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE CHINA 7 2. SHUMEN MUNIICIPALITY BULGARIA 5 3. BELARUS WORKERS’ UNION BELARUS 4 4. SCTT GABROVO BULGARIA 3 5. TRIO HASKOVO BULGARIA 2 6. S.P.K. ISRAEL 1 Final standing Table tennis – men individual Name 1. LIN WEI - WORKERS’ CENTRE FOR INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE – CHINA 2. ZHU YIU - WORKERS’ CENTRE FOR INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE – CHINA 3. XU TIAN - WORKERS’ CENTRE FOR INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE – CHINA Final standing Table tennis – women Team Country p. 1. ASAREL MEDET PLC - PANAGYURISHTE BULGARIA 7 2. ENERGOREMONT KOZLODUY BULGARIA 5 3. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 4 4. MARITSA EAST 2 TPP BULGARIA 3 5. ELECTRICA SPORTS CLUB ROMANIA 2 Final standing Table tennis – women individual Name 1. YOVANITA GEORGIEVA - ASAREL MEDET PLC - PANAGYURISHTE 2. DANIELA HRISTOVA - ASAREL MEDET PLC - PANAGYURISHTE 3. ANELIA MOTAFOVA – ENERGOREMONT KOZLODUY Final standing Chess – men Team Country p. 1. SHUMEN MUNIICIPALITY BULGARIA 7 2. BEOGRAD ELEKTRANE SERBIA 5 3. „ATOM-SPORT” RUSSIA 4 4. BELARUS WORKERS’ UNION BELARUS 3 5. ELECTRICA SPORTS CLUB ROMANIA 2 6. BELARUS WORKERS’ UNION 2 BELARUS 0 7. INDEPENDENT TRADE UNION OF KOSOVO KOSOVO 1 Final standing Chess – women Team Country p. 1. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM OPERATOR BULGARIA 7 2. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 5 3. REGIONAL COUNCIL TO CITUB - GABROVO BULGARIA 4 4. MARITSA EAST 2 TPP BULGARIA 3 5. „ATOM-SPORT” RUSSIA 2 Final standing Bridge – men Team Country p. 1. S.P.K. ISRAEL 7 2. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM OPERATOR BULGARIA 5 3. SHUMEN MUNICIPALITY BULGARIA 4 4. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 3 5. BANK DISCOUNT ISRAEL 2 6. MARITSA EAST 2 TPP BULGARIA 1 Final standing Bridge – women Team Country p. 1. S.P.K. 2 ISRAEL 7 2. MARITSA EAST 2 TPP BULGARIA 5 3. S.P.K. ISRAEL 0 4. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 4 5. ELECTRICA SPORTS CLUB ROMANIA 3 6. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM OPERATOR BULGARIA 2 Final standing Basketball (streetball) – men Team Country p. 1. EL COMMERCE BULGARIA 7 2. „ATOM-SPORT” RUSSIA 5 3. BEOGRAD ELEKTRANE SERBIA 4 4. WORKERS’ CENTRE FOR INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE CHINA 3 5. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 2 6. HAPOEL KAMAG ISRAEL 1 Final standing Basketball (streetball) – women Team Country p. 1. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 7 2. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM OPERATOR BULGARIA 5 3. BANK DISCOUNT 4 ISRAEL 4 4. S.P.K. ISRAEL 3 5. BANK IGOUD ISRAEL 2 6. BANK DISCOUNT 3 ISRAEL 1 Final standing Darts – men Team Country p. 1. ART SINDIKAT VOJVODINA SERBIA 7 2. INDEPENDENT TRADE UNION OF KOSOVO KOSOVO 5 3. BOCCE FEDERATION TURKEY 4 4. REGIOKOM VARNA BULGARIA 3 5. MARITSA EAST 2 TPP I BULGARIA 2 6. MARITSA EAST 2 TPP II BULGARIA 0 7. MAXAM BULGARIA JSC BULGARIA 1 Final standing Darts – men individual Name 1. ANDREI MANKOV – „ATOM-SPORT” - RUSSIA 2. MEHDI RAMA - INDEPENDENT TRADE UNION OF KOSOVO 3. TALIB ARSLAN - BOCCE FEDERATION - TURKEY 4. ORHAN GAGLAR - BOCCE FEDERATION - TURKEY 5. EMIL PETROV – CFST “NPP BELENE” – BULGARIA 6. MIRKO BERIC – ART SINDIKAT VOJVODINA - SERBIA Final standing Darts – women Team Country p. 1. „ATOM-SPORT” RUSSIA 7 2. BULGARIAN NATIONAL TELEVISION BULGARIA 5 3. „ATOM-SPORT” 2 RUSSIA 0 4. REGIONAL COUNCIL TO CITUB - GABROVO BULGARIA 4 5. MARITSA EAST 2 TPP BULGARIA 3 6. INDEPENDENT TRADE UNION OF KOSOVO KOSOVO 2 7. REGIOKOM VARNA 2 BULGARIA 1 Final standing Darts – women individual Name 1. MARINA SHERSHUKOVA - „ATOM-SPORT” - RUSSIA 2. ELIZABETA ANZOVA – KNAUF BULGARIA - BULGARIA 3. CVETANKA PARICHKOVA - WATER SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE SYSTEM STARA ZAGORA – BULGARIA Final standing Track and field athletics – men Team Country p. 1. „ATOM-SPORT” RUSSIA 7 2. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM OPERATOR BULGARIA 5 3. ONCST TUNISIA 4 4. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 3 5. SHUMEN MUNICIPALITY BULGARIA 2 6. “SLEN’90” ROMANIA 1 Final standing Track and field athletics – men individual Name 1. ALEKSEI BRUSNICIN - „ATOM-SPORT” – RUSSIA – 7.41 2. SHABAN MUSTAFA – SHUMEN MUNICIPALITY – 7.44 3. ANGEL TRIFONOV - ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM OPERATOR – 8.10 Final standing Track and field athletics – women Team Country p. 1. „ATOM-SPORT” RUSSIA 7 2. SHUMEN MUNICIPALITY BULGARIA 5 3. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 4 4. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM OPERATOR BULGARIA 3 Final standing Track and field athletics – women individual Name 1. INNA SMIRNOVA - „ATOM-SPORT” – RUSSIA – 4.12 2. KAROLINA NIKOLOVA – SHUMEN MUNICIPALITY – 4.18 3. ELENA BOIARSKAIA - „ATOM-SPORT” – RUSSIA – 4.20 Final standing Swimming – men Team Country p. 1. „ATOM-SPORT” RUSSIA 7 2. BELARUS WORKERS’ UNION 2 BELARUS 5 3. S.P.K. ISRAEL 4 4. BEN GOURION AIRPORT ISRAEL 3 5. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 2 6. BELARUS WORKERS’ UNION BELARUS 0 7. “SLEN’90” ROMANIA 1 Final standing Swimming – men individual Name 1. KIRIIL KIREEV - „ATOM-SPORT” – RUSSIA – 0.24.87 2. ALEXANDER LARMASH - „ATOM-SPORT” – RUSSIA – 0.25.01 3. ALEXANDR NIKOLAEV - „ATOM-SPORT” – RUSSIA – 0.25.74 Final standing Swimming – women Team Country p. 1. BELARUS WORKERS’ UNION BELARUS 7 2. „ATOM-SPORT” RUSSIA 5 3. S.P.K. ISRAEL 4 4. BEN GOURION AIRPORT ISRAEL 3 5. S.P.K. 2 ISRAEL 2 6. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 1 Final standing Swimming – women individual Name 1. LIUDMILA KUPIYANOVA - „ATOM-SPORT” – RUSSIA – 0.29.65 2. VIKTORIA SHEVKO - BELARUS WORKERS’ UNION - BELARUS – 0.31.5 3. RONIT KATAN – S.P.K. – ISRAEL – 0.32.27 Final standing Swimming relay – men Team Country p. 1. BELARUS WORKERS’ UNION BELARUS 7 2. „ATOM-SPORT” RUSSIA 5 3. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 4 4. BEN GOURION AIRPORT ISRAEL 3 5. S.P.K. 2 ISRAEL 2 6. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM OPERATOR BULGARIA 1 Final standing Swimming relay – women Team Country p. 1. BELARUS WORKERS’ UNION BELARUS 7 2. S.P.K. ISRAEL 5 3. „ATOM-SPORT” RUSSIA 4 4. BEN GOURION AIRPORT ISRAEL 3 5. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 2 Final standing Tug of war – men Team Country p. 1. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 7 2. MARITSA EAST 2 TPP BULGARIA 5 3. „ATOM-SPORT” RUSSIA 4 4. MAXAM BULGARIA BULGARIA 3 5. COUNTY COOPERATIVE UNION - TARGOVISHTE BULGARIA 2 6. NIKOLA KOZLEVO MUNICIPALITY BULGARIA 1 Final standing Tug of war – women Team Country p. 1. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 7 2. MARITSA EAST 2 TPP BULGARIA 5 3. COUNTY COOPERATIVE UNION - TARGOVISHTE BULGARIA 4 4. „ATOM-SPORT” RUSSIA 3 5. BELARUS WORKERS’ UNION BELARUS 2 Final standing Shooting with air gun – men Team Country p. 1. NPP KOZLODUY BULGARIA 7 2. MARITSA EAST 2 TPP BULGARIA 5 3. CFST “NPP BELENE” BULGARIA 4 4. NPP KOZLODUY 2 BULGARIA 0 5. CFST “NPP BELENE” 2 BULGARIA 0 6. „ATOM-SPORT” RUSSIA 3 7. SHUMEN MUNICIPALITY BULGARIA 2 8. INDEPENDENT TRADE UNION OF KOSOVO KOSOVO 1 Final standing Shooting with air gun – men individual Name 1. DONCHO KIULANOV - NPP KOZLODUY – 177 p. 2. GEORGI KOCHARENKO - „ATOM-SPORT” – RUSSIA – 172 p. 3. EMIL PETROV - CFST “NPP BELENE” 2 – 171 p. Final standing Shooting with air gun – women Team Country p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • А Г Р О С Т А Т И С Т И К А a G R O S T a T I S T I
    МИНИСТЕРСТВО на ЗЕМЕДЕЛИЕТО и ХРАНИТЕ СОФИЯ 1040, бул. “Христо Ботев” № 55 № 166 – декември 2010 А A СТРУКТУРА Г G НА ЛОЗЯТА В БЪЛГАРИЯ Р R О O юли 2009 година ОКОНЧАТЕЛНИ РЕЗУЛТАТИ С S Т T А A VINEYARD BASIC Т T SURVEY- BULGARIA И I С S July 2009 Т T FINAL RESULTS И I К C А S РЕЗУЛТАТИ И АНАЛИЗИ RESULTS AND ANALYSES МЗХ, ОТДЕЛ “АГРОСТАТИСТИКА” MAF, AGROSTATISTICS DEPARTMENT СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ CONTENTS І. Въведение ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 І. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 ІІ. Основни дефиниции и понятия .................................................................................................................................................. 5 ІI. Basic definitions and terms ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 ІІІ. Резултати и анализи .................................................................................................................................................................... 8 ІІІ. Results and analysis .........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria 2020 International Religious Freedom Report
    BULGARIA 2020 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary The constitution provides for freedom of religion and conscience. Religious groups may worship without registering, but registered groups receive benefits. The constitution recognizes Eastern Orthodox Christianity as the country’s “traditional” religion, and the law exempts the Bulgarian Orthodox Church (BOC) from registration. In December, the Plovdiv Appellate Court began hearing an appeal by 14 Romani Muslims convicted in 2019 of spreading Salafi Islam, among other charges. Muslim leaders again said several municipalities denied permission to build new or rehabilitate existing religious facilities. The Evangelical Alliance and some other religious groups stated the government did not apply COVID-19 restrictions on religious groups equally, favoring the BOC. The European Court of Human Rights stopped the deportation of three Uyghur Muslims to China. In February, a Shumen court ruled the municipality’s ordinance restricting proselytizing was unconstitutional. A parliamentarian and member of the governing political coalition criticized the ruling, which was being appealed, calling Jehovah’s Witnesses a “dangerous sect.” In February, the Supreme Administrative Court upheld the Sofia mayor’s ban on the annual march honoring Hristo Lukov, leader of a pro-Nazi organization in the 1940s, restricting the event to laying flowers at Lukov’s plaque. The academy of sciences published a report, backed by several government ministries, denying the World War II-era government had sent Jews to forced labor camps but instead had tried to save them from the Nazis. The Jewish nongovernmental organization (NGO) Shalom reported death threats, increased incidents of anti-Semitic hate speech in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and periodic vandalism of Jewish cemeteries and monuments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Largest 50 Beneficiaries in Each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds” Prepared at the Request of the CONT Committee
    STUDY Requested by CONT Committee The Largest 50 Beneficiaries in each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds PRE-RELEASE Policy Department for Budgetary Affairs Authors: Willem Pieter DE GROEN, Jorge NUNEZ, Daina BELICKA, Roberto EN MUSMECI, Damir GOJSIC and Silvia TADI Directorate-General for Internal Policies PE 679.107– January 2021 The Largest 50 Beneficiaries in each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds PRE-RELEASE Abstract This report provides the preliminary findings of the study on “The Largest 50 beneficiaries in each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds” prepared at the request of the CONT committee. It provides the results of an assessment of almost 300 systems for the public disclosure of the beneficiaries of the common agricultural policy (CAP) and cohesion policy. Moreover, it provides the preliminary results for the analysis of about 10 million beneficiaries of the CAP in 2018 and 2019 and more than 500 000 projects receiving cohesion funds between 2014 and 2020. Finally, it assesses the barriers to more data transparency and the possibilities to enhance the transparency. NOTE: This is a pre-release version of the study. Changes may occur based on the final results of the research. For internal use only. This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control. It designated Ms Monika Hohlmeier to follow the study. AUTHORS Willem Pieter DE GROEN, CEPS Jorge NUNEZ, CEPS Daina BELICKA, CSE COE Roberto MUSMECI, CEPS Damir GOJSIC, CEPS Silvia TADI, CEPS The authors would like to thank Daniele Genta, Babak Hakimi and Xinyi Li for their valuable contributions to this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Decision
    COMMISSION DECISION of 18 September 2009 implementing Coucil Directive 2008/73/EC as regards Iternet -based information pages cotaining lists of establishments and laboratories approved by Member States in accordance with Community veterinary and zootechnical legilation ANNEX II CHAPTER 1 ETABLISHMENTS IN THE VETERINARY FIELD I. Assembly centres List of assembly centres approved fo intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine Version RVS (ОДБХ) (Directive 64/432/ЕCC), equidae (directive 90/426/ЕCC), ovine and caprine (Directive91/68/ЕCC) (insert date) Approval number Approval date Name Contact details Species Remarks Pazardhzik :4400 Pazardhik,4„ St Ciril and Metody” „Ital Komercho-91”SPLtd str № 4455 0481 00057”б” 23.03.2011 :+359 34 45 62 24 Small ruminants “Ital commercio-91”Srl. :+359 34 45 00 14 № 4456 0481 @ <[email protected]> :4582 village of Ravnogor, Peshtera(Bratzigovo) municipality Assembly centre and Dimitar Ivanov Pashkulev Large ruminants 0001 14.03.2011 :+359 3552 21 57 premises of dealer 4582-0202 :+359 3552 20 72 @ <[email protected]> :4400 Pazardhik city ,2 „Patriarh Evtimii” Premises of dealer Petar Nikolov Sharkov str ., floor 1,app.4 Equidae 0078 28.03.2011 (Holding: farm horses and 4407-0215 :+359 896824 888 premises of dealer) : “ELIT SNS” Ltd Large ruminants, Assembly centre and Suleiman Asanov Hodjov 4220 Kritchim city ,28„Targovetz” str. 0046 16.09.2011 Small ruminants premises of dealer 4456-0002 : 4456-0002 Silistra : Sofia city, Izgrev quarter, 001 97 „Uri Gagarin” str,entr. B, floor 2 „RONEX” 2000 LTD 12.01.2007 : 086/812303 Small ruminants Assembly center 7588-1902 : +35986/812358 @ [email protected] : Sofia city, 26 “Gagarin “ str.
    [Show full text]
  • Denitsa Zagorcheva SJM.Qxd
    S e r b i a n Serbian Journal of Management 15 (2) (2020) 263 - 275 J o u r n a l o f Management www.sjm06.com dYNAMiC ESTiMATioN oF THE LoCAL BUSiNESS ENViRoNMENT iN SUPPoRT To iNVESTMENT dECiSioNS oF THE ToP MANAGERS denitsa Petkova Zagorchevaa* and daniel Yordanov Pavlovb aUniversity of Shumen, 115 Universitetska Str., 9700 Shumen, Bulgaria bUniversity of Ruse, 8 Studentska Str., 7017 Ruse, Bulgaria (Received 05 September 2018; accepted 01 April 2020) Abstract Every manager has some investment ideas for business development. Some of the investments are related to a construction of production facilities in new locations and the investors face variety of risks, which even could stop the initial development plans. Many of these risks are due to the lack of reliable data about the business environment in the new areas. Failing the preparation, they would get heavy financial losses. Here comes the science to empower them with proper economic models. The aim of this article is to present how an economic model for estimation of the local business environment can be applied to some Bulgarian cities on the base of the municipality tax system and the local investment policy. Thus the entrepreneurs would be able to compare the business environment in different municipalities, as well as to identify possible dynamics in their trends. Keywords: business environment, estimation, tax policy, municipality 1. iNTRodUCTioN (2017) even propose new approach towards the core of the Corporate Social What are the main responsibilities of the Responsibility. Mihajlovic et al. (2016) puts managers? The scientists answer quite the environment awareness as a universal differently on this question.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Areas in Bulgaria As a Threat for Socio-Economic Development
    PENERLIEV, Milen (2016). Rural areas in Bulgaria as a threat for socio-economic development. The Overarching Issues of the European Space: Rethinking Socioeconomic and Environmental Problems…Porto: FLUP, pp. 90-98 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ RURAL AREAS IN BULGARIA AS A THREAT FOR SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Milen PENERLIEV “Konstantin Preslavski” University of Shumen, Bulgaria [email protected] Abstract Approximately 1.9 million residents live in Bulgarian villages today. In the early 2015 of all 5264 towns and villages in Bulgaria the number of towns was just 257. A sufficient part of the population of the state spends its lives in them and in their adjacent territories so that it should be thoroughly researched and analyzed – the population itself with its demographic characteristics, as well as the rural areas with their features and distinctive aspects. In the material basic methods is: analysis of statistical data, survey methods, interviews and personal observations. Large volume of results is personal conclusions the author after field trips in rural areas for 7 years. Key words : rural, development, areas. Resumo Aproximadamente 1.9 milhão de habitantes vivem atualmente em cidades na Bulgária. No início de 2015, de todas as 5264 cidades e aldeias da Bulgária, o número de cidades era de apenas 257. Uma parte significativa da população do Estado gasta a sua vida nestas cidades e nos seus territórios adjacentes, sendo necessária realizar uma cuidadosa pesquisada sobre a população com suas características demográficas, bem como as áreas rurais com as suas características e aspectos distintos. Palavras-chave: rural, desenvolvimento, áreas. 1. Introduction and objective of the paper The definitions stated above indicate that prevalent municipalities in Bulgaria are rural areas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shumen Region (Nuts3) As an Example of a Region with Social Problems
    Working Paper Series Serie 6 Spaces, Territories and Regions Paper No. 6.03.03.03 The Shumen Region (Nuts3) as an Example of a Region with Social Problems Julia Spiridonova* *Bulgarian National Centre for Regional Development 2014 www.grincoh.eu This paper was funded under the FP7 project “Growth– Innovation – Competitiveness: Fostering Cohesion in Central and Eastern Europe (GRINCOH)” under the Programme SSH.2011.2.2-1: Addressing cohesion challenges in Central and Eastern Europe; Area 8.2.2 Regional, territorial and social cohesion. Project Nr. 290657 Julia Spiridonova, [email protected] Bulgarian National Centre for Regional Development http://www.ncrdhp.bg/en/ Please cite as: Spiridonova J.,(2014), ‘The Shumen Region (Nuts3) as an Example of a Region with Social Problems’, GRINCOH Working Paper Series, Paper No. 6.03.03.03 The Shumen Region (Nuts3) as an Example of a Region with Social Problems Content 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 2 2. Trajectories of economic development and structural change, social cohesion ............... 6 3. Development factors ........................................................................................................ 14 3a. External context of development: trade and FDI ............................................................... 15 3b. Endogenous growth factors: innovation and entrepreneurship ....................................... 16 4. Governance and local/regional development policies
    [Show full text]
  • Mending the Broken Link Finding an Innovative Approach for Inclusive Social Policy for the Most Marginalized Children and Families in Shumen Region, Bulgaria
    Lund University Master of Science in International Development and Management June 2014 Mending the broken link Finding an Innovative Approach for inclusive social policy for the most marginalized children and families in Shumen Region, Bulgaria Author: Yassen Georgiev Supervisor: Elsa Coimbra 1 Abstract This paper explores the opportunities of developing innovative approaches for new types of social policies aimed at the most marginalized and socially excluded communities that live in the North-Eastern Bulgarian Region of Shumen. The study focuses on the processes of transition and the social conditions in post-communist Bulgaria, the reasons for marginalization, and seeks an appropriate model for a new type of service – the Family Counseling Centers sponsored by UNICEF Bulgaria. The paper explains how this case of partnership between State and nonprofit organization can lead to improvement of the well- being of communities. The findings of this thesis lead to problems, concerning the approach towards human development and social policies and the sustainability of every effort in current and future environments. 2 List of content 1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………..….4 1.1.Research Question…………………………………………………………………..….5 1.2.Looking back to previous models..………………………………………………….....6 1.2.1. The Communist Welfare State.……………………………...………………....6 1.2.2. The Neo-Liberal Reforms………………………..………………………….…7 1.3.Marginalization of communities………………...……………………………...……...9 1.4.Theory for a new model………………………………………………………………12 1.5.Object of research – FCC`s working in Shumen Region……………………………..13 1.5.1. Why Shumen Region…………..……………………………………………..15 1.5.2. FCCs as a positive outcome of a previous project…………..………………..15 1.5.3. How do they do it?..……………...……………………………………...……17 1.6.Methodology…………………………….……………………………………………19 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Concept Notes
    List of the pvovisionally selected (short-listed) concept notes BG2005/017-353.10.01 Human Resources Development and Promotion of Employment Restricted call for proposals reference: EuropeAid/124938/M/ACT/BG Phare 2005/HRDPE /GRANTS Reference number Name of organization Town/village Municipality District Address Title of the Proposal "Zapad" housing estate, bl. "Provision of employment through of concrete articles in BG2005/017-353.10.01-1.002 "Galant 7" Ltd. Targovishte Targovishte Targovishte 1 48, entr. C, fl. 5, app.15 the village of Lilyak" "Perspectives for the occupation of a fitter of power BG2005/017-353.10.01-1.004 "Yotovi" Ltd. Lukovit Pleven Pleven 6, "Hristo Botev" Str. 2 equipments and installations in the town of Lukovit" 3 BG2005/017-353.10.01-1.005 ST "Ka-Stela-Ivanka Antonova" Targovishte Targovishte Targovishte 44, "Trapezitsa" Str. "Ka - Stela" - To Carve the Stone with a Hand Master" "Encouraging employment in Ruse through providing 4 BG2005/017-353.10.01-1.007 "Road Engineering" Ltd. Ruse Ruse Ruse 14, "Olimpi Panov" Str vocational qualification and hiring of unemployed persons in Road Engineering Ltd. - Ruse" Federation of Scientific and "NEW START Initiative for fostering of entrepreneurship BG2005/017-353.10.01-2.008 Technical Unions - Vocational Sofia Sofia Sofia 108, "G.S.Rakovski" Str. 5 through vocational training and consulting" Education and Training Centre "Training of unemployed persons in the Speciality 6 BG2005/017-353.10.01-1.009 "Tergo" Ltd. Ruse Ruse Ruse 72, "Borisova" Str "Millwork and glass-installing" and creation of new jobs within the company TERGO Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • А G R O S T А Т I S T I
    REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA Census of Agricultural Holdings in Bulgaria in 2010 Ministry of Agriculture and Food Ministry of agriculture and food With the financial support of the European Union No 227 – November 2012 Agricultural Census in 2010 2010 2020020052005 SHUMEN DISTRICT – main results General characteristics of the district Shumen District is located in the Northeast Region and А is one of the 28 districts in Bulgaria (level NUTS 3 of the common classification of territorial units for АГРО statistics of EU). The total area of the district is 3 390.2 G sq.km or 3.1% of the country's territory. The number of settlements is 151, administrated in 10 municipalities, СТАТ the towns are 8 and the villages – 143. According to the R population census 2011 the district's population is 180 528 residents or 2.5% of the population in the ИСТИ country. The total utilized agricultural area (UAA) is O 1 495 480.7 dca or 44% of the territory of the district. КА STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS Резултати и S The number of agricultural holdings in Shumen District is 10 740 or 2.9% of the holdings in the country. The utilized agricultural area (UAA) is 1 495 dca and is distributed in 10 069 holdings. Theанализи average UAA size for the holdings in the district is 148.5 dca or 47% over the average size for the country – 101.3 dca. The Shumen municipality has the biggest T share of UAA in the district – 23.7% with an average area – 333.2 dca. Holdings without UAA are 671.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Beneficiaries Development Fund Operational Programme Environment 2007 – 2013 Cohesion Fund
    Last update 03/10/2012 EUROPEAN UNION OPPORTUNITIES EUROPEAN REGIONAL FOR BETTER LIFE LIST OF BENEFICIARIES DEVELOPMENT FUND OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME ENVIRONMENT 2007 – 2013 COHESION FUND Year of Total Amounts Amounts Project Allocation/Y Paid at the End Name of the Beneficiary Name and Number of the Procedure Name of the Operation Committed № proposal No ear of Final of the Operation (BGN) Payment (BGN) West Aegean Basin Directorate – Blagoevgrad Partners: Danube Region Basin Directorate – Pleven; BG161PO005/08/1.20/01/06 Development of 1. DIR 58126-1-1 Development of River Basin Management Plans 2009 36 048 000.00 East Aegean Basin Directorate – River Basin Management Plans Plovdiv; Black Sea Region Basin Directorate - Varna Protection of the wild goat and the brown bear in Bulgaria BG161PO005/08/3.0/01/05 Protection and (outside the territory of national and nature parks and 2. Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation restoration of biodiversity in the Republic of 58301-75-495 2009 578 832,00 reserves) through the implementation of components of the Bulgaria action plans of the two species BG161PO005/10/3.0/2/20 Activities for 5103020-39- 3. Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation conservation and restoration of biodiversity in Action plans for wood grouse, and three-toed woodpeckers 2012 437 962,69 682 Bulgaria Bulgarian Society for the protection BG161PO005/08/3.0/01/05 Protection and 4. of birds restoration of biodiversity in the Republic of 58301-62-482 Protection of vultures in East Rodopi Mountain 2009 95 000,00 28 160,25 * implemented on 23.11.2011 Bulgaria National Nature Protection Service BG161PO005/09/3.1/01/08 Development of Mapping and determination of the conservation status of 5.
    [Show full text]