DOCSLIB.ORG

А Г Р О С Т А Т И С Т И К А a G R O S T a T I S T I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
А Г Р О С Т А Т И С Т И К А a G R O S T a T I S T I МИНИСТЕРСТВО на ЗЕМЕДЕЛИЕТО и ХРАНИТЕ СОФИЯ 1040, бул. “Христо Ботев” № 55 № 166 – декември 2010 А A СТРУКТУРА Г G НА ЛОЗЯТА В БЪЛГАРИЯ Р R О O юли 2009 година ОКОНЧАТЕЛНИ РЕЗУЛТАТИ С S Т T А A VINEYARD BASIC Т T SURVEY- BULGARIA И I С S July 2009 Т T FINAL RESULTS И I К C А S РЕЗУЛТАТИ И АНАЛИЗИ RESULTS AND ANALYSES МЗХ, ОТДЕЛ “АГРОСТАТИСТИКА” MAF, AGROSTATISTICS DEPARTMENT СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ CONTENTS І. Въведение ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 І. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 ІІ. Основни дефиниции и понятия .................................................................................................................................................. 5 ІI. Basic definitions and terms ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 ІІІ. Резултати и анализи .................................................................................................................................................................... 8 ІІІ. Results and analysis .......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Графика 1. Относителен дял на броя на стопанствата и на площите, заети с лозови насаждения, според юридическия статут ....... 9 Figure 1. Percentage of number of the holdings and cultivated area under vines by the legal status of the holdings ............................ 9 Графика 2. Използвана земеделска площ на стопанствата, отглеждащи лозови насаждения по статистически райони ................... 10 Figure 2. Utilized agricultural area in the holdings with area under vines by statistical regions ........................................................ 10 Графика 3. Брой стопанства, отглеждащи лозови насаждения по статистически райони ....................................................................... 10 Figure 3. Number of holdings with area under vines by statistical regions .......................................................................................... 10 Графика 4. Брой стопанства и площи, заети с лозови насаждения, в зависимост реализацията на продукцията от грозде ............. 11 Figure 4. Number of holdings and area under vines by distribution of the grape production .............................................................. 11 Графика 5. Разпределение на площите с лозови насаждения по статистически райони .......................................................................... 12 Figure 5. Allocation of the area under vines by statistical regions ....................................................................................................... 12 Графика 6. Относителен дял на площите с лозови насаждения по производствено направление .......................................................... 12 Figure 6. Percentage of the areas under vines broken down by type of production ............................................................................. 12 Графика 7. Относителен дял на винените сортове в България ..................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 7. Percentage of the wine-grape varieties in Bulgaria .............................................................................................................. 13 Таблица 1. Относителeн дял от площта на бели и червени винени сортове в България .......................................................................... 13 Table 1. Percentage of the area under white and black wine-grape varieties in Bulgaria ................................................................... 13 Графика 8. Разпределение на винените сортове по статистически райони ................................................................................................. 14 Figure 8. Allocation of the wine-grape varieties by statistical regions ................................................................................................. 14 Таблица 2. Възрастова структура на винените лозя в България ................................................................................................................... 15 Table 2. Age classes of the vineyards in Bulgaria ................................................................................................................................. 15 Таблица 3. Разпределение на площите, заети с лозови насаждения, според юридическия статут на стопанството по области и статистически райони ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 16 Table 3. Allocation of the area under vines, by the legal status of the holding by districts and statistical regions .............................. 16 Таблица 4. Основни показатели на лозарските стопанства – брой стопанства, ИЗП, обща площ на лозята, площ на винените и десертни сортове по области и статистически райони ................................................................................................................................. 17 Table 4. Key indicators of the holdings with area under vines – number of holdings, utilized agricultural area, area under vines by categories and by districts and statistical regions ............................................................................................................................ 17 Таблица 5. Сортова структура на винените лозя в България ........................................................................................................................ 18 Table 5. Wine-grape varieties in Bulgaria ............................................................................................................................................ 18 Таблица 6. Сортова и възрастова структура на винените лозя в България ................................................................................................ 20 Table 6. Аrea under wine-grape varieties in Bulgaria, broken down by variery and by аge of the vines ............................................. 20 Таблица 6.1. Сортова и възрастова структура на винените лозя в област Благоевград ........................................................................... 22 Table 6.1. Аrea under wine-grape varieties in Blagoevgrad, broken down by variery and by аge of the vines .................................... 22 Таблица 6. 2. Сортова и възрастова структура на винените лозя в област Бургас .................................................................................... 23 Table 6.2. Аrea under wine-grape varieties in Burgas, broken down by variery and by аge of the vines ............................................. 23 СТРУКТУРА НА ЛОЗЯТА В БЪЛГАРИЯ VINEYARD BASIC SURVEY - BULGARIA 1 МЗХ, ОТДЕЛ “АГРОСТАТИСТИКА” MAF, AGROSTATISTICS DEPARTMENT Таблица 6.3. Сортова и възрастова структура на винените лозя в област Варна ...................................................................................... 24 Table 6.3. Аrea under wine-grape varieties in Varna, broken down by variery and by аge of the vines .............................................. 24 Таблица 6.4. Сортова и възрастова структура на винените лозя в област Велико Търново .................................................................... 25 Table 6.4. Аrea under wine-grape varieties in Veliko Tarnovo, broken down by variery and by аge of the vines ................................ 25 Таблица 6.5. Сортова и възрастова структура на винените лозя в област Видин ...................................................................................... 26 Table 6.5. Аrea under wine-grape varieties in Vidin, broken down by variery and by аge of the vines ............................................... 26 Таблица 6.6. Сортова и възрастова структура на винените лозя в област Враца ...................................................................................... 27 Table 6.6. Аrea under wine-grape varieties in Vratsa, broken down by variery and by аge of the vines ............................................. 27 Таблица 6.7. Сортова и възрастова структура на винените лозя в област Габрово ................................................................................... 27 Table 6.7. Аrea under wine-grape varieties in Gabrovo, broken down by variery and by аge of the vines .......................................... 27 Таблица 6.8. Сортова и възрастова структура на винените лозя в област Добрич .................................................................................... 28 Table 6.8. Аrea under wine-grape varieties in Dobrich, broken down by variery and by аge of the vines ........................................... 28 Таблица 6.9. Сортова и възрастова структура на винените лозя в област Кърджали ............................................................................... 28 Table 6.9. Аrea under wine-grape varieties in Kardzhali, broken down by variery and by аge of the vines ........................................ 28 Таблица 6.10. Сортова и възрастова структура на винените лозя в област Кюстендил ..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT Repealed SG No 53 of 13 July 2012
    WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT Repealed SG No 53 of 13 July 2012 Promulgated, SG No. 86/30.09.2003, amended SG 70/10.08.2004, effective 1.01.2005, amended and supplemented, SG No. 77/27.09.2005, amended, SG No. 87/1.11.2005, effective 1.05.2006, amended and supplemented, SG No. 88/4.11.2005, amended, SG No. 95/29.11.2005, effective 1.03.2006, SG No. 105/29.12.2005, effective 1.01.2006, SG No. 30/11.04.2006, effective 12.07.2006, SG No. 34/25.04.2006, effective 1.01.2008 (*)(**), SG No. 63/4.08.2006, effective 4.08.2006, SG No. 36/4.04.2008, SG No. 70/8.08.2008, amended and supplemented, SG No. 105/9.12.2008, amended, SG No. 82/16.10.2009, effective 16.10.2009, supplemented, SG No. 95/1.12.2009, effective 11.08.2006, amended and supplemented, SG No. 41/1.06.2010, amended, SG No. 63/13.08.2010, SG No. 98/14.12.2010,effective 1.01.2011, SG No. 8/25.01.2011, effective 25.01.2011, amended and supplemented, SG No.30/12.04.2011,amended, SG No. 33/26.04.2011, effective 27.05.2011, SG No. 99/16.12.2011, effective 1.01.2012, amended by Judgment No. 3/21.03.2012 of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Bulgaria -SG No. 26/30.03.2012 (*) effective 1.07.2007 -amended, SG No. 80/3.10.2006, effective 3.10.2006 (**) effective 1.01.2008 -amended, SG No.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • Forum Process: Program Data
    FORUM PROCESS PROGRAM DATA PROGRAM DATA FP Program Data Cover.indd 1 11/20/07 3:03:17 AM FORUM PROCESS PUBLICATIONS 1 Donor’s Brief 2 Initiator’s Guide 3 Coordinator’s Guide 4 Moderator’s Guide 5 Forum Program Data 6 Forum Films Publisher: Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) 3003 Berne www.deza.ch Concept and coordination: Tulum Ltd. CH – 6987 Caslano www.tulum-consult.com The information in this brochure was provided by: Balkan Assist Association, Sofia Foundation for Local Government Reform, Sofia Agency for Socioeconomic Analyses, Sofia Industrieconsult, Sofia Business Center, Svishtov Znanie Association, Lovech NGO Club, Targovishte National Alliance for Volunteer Action, Plovdiv Regional Association of Municipalities “Trakya”, Stara Zagora Center for Sustainable Development of Teteven Municipality, Teteven Compilation and processing: Diana Andreeva and Irena Boneva Summary of the information: Maya Krasteva Introduction texts: Ginka Kapitanova, Iva Taralezhkova and Alex Melzer Layout: Mark Manion, Commusication Arts Orders: SDC Distribution Center Telephone: +41 31 322 44 12 Fax: +41 31 324 13 48 E-mail: [email protected] © SDC 2007 FP Program Data Cover.indd 2 11/20/07 3:03:17 AM FORUM PROCESS PROGRAM DATA FP Program Data.indd 1 11/20/07 8:00:27 AM CONTEnts PROGRAM OVERVIEW ...........................................7 THE SDC FORUM PROGRAM IN BULGARIA 2000–2007..................7 Summary Table 1 – Program Outcome and Volume ..................9 Summary Table 2 – Timetable
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Eurytoma Schreineri Schreiner (Hym., Eurytomidae) in Bulgaria
    Veselin Arnaudov, Radoslav Andreev, Hristina Kutinkova, Svilen Raikov PRELIMINARY COMMUNICATION First record of Eurytoma schreineri Schreiner (Hym., Eurytomidae) in Bulgaria Veselin Arnaudov1, Radoslav Andreev2, Hristina Kutinkova1, Svilen Raikov3 1 Fruit growing institute – Plovdiv, 12 Ostromila Str., 4004 Plovdiv, Bulgaria ([email protected]) 2 Department of Entomology, Agricultural University, Mendeleev 12, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria 3 University of Shumen “Ep. K. Preslavsky”, 30 Universitetsca Str., 9700 Shumen, Bulgaria ABSTRACT The plum seed wasp, Eurytoma schreineri Schr. (Schreiner, 1908) is non-native species insect for Bulgarian fauna. This species was first recordеd in Bulgaria in 2013, in the regions Dobrich and Silistra, in the northeastern part of the country. E. schreineri is oligophagous. The larva feeds in the endosperm of stone fruits, mainly in plum and apricot and rarely sweet and sour cherry. Attacked fruits visibly did not differ from healthy. Infested fruits caused massive fruit falls and drying. Some preliminary observations on its phenology, main morphological characters and differences from other related species are mentioned. Keywords: Prunus domestica, plum seed wasp, Eurytoma schreineri, adult emergence, Northeast Bulgaria Introduction Species of the genus Eurytoma (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae) display a wide range of host and biology, with eight Palearctic species associated with stone fruit. Unlike most chalcidoids which are parasitoids, the larvae of some species of the family Eurytomidae are phytophagous. The following five species are of economic importance for stone fruits: Eurytoma amygdali Enderlein for almond and wild almond; Eurytoma schreineri Schreiner for apricot, cherry, plum and blackthorn, Eurytoma maslovskii Nikolskaja for peach, Eurytoma padi Vereshchagin for bird cherry and Eurytoma samsonowi Vassiliev for almond, apricot, plum and peach.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Bulgaria Ministry of Energy 1/73 Fifth
    REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF ENERGY FIFTH NATIONAL REPORT ON BULGARIA’S PROGRESS IN THE PROMOTION AND USE OF ENERGY FROM RENEWABLE SOURCES Drafted in accordance with Article 22(1) of Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources on the basis of the model for Member State progress reports set out in Directive 2009/28/EC December 2019 1/73 REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF ENERGY TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS USED ..................................................................................................................................4 UNITS OF MEASUREMENT ............................................................................................................................5 1. Shares (sectoral and overall) and actual consumption of energy from renewable sources in the last 2 years (2017 and 2018) (Article 22(1) of Directive 2009/28/EC) ........................................................................6 2. Measures taken in the last 2 years (2017 and 2018) and/or planned at national level to promote the growth of energy from renewable sources, taking into account the indicative trajectory for achieving the national RES targets as outlined in your National Renewable Energy Action Plan. (Article 22(1)(a) of Directive 2009/28/EC) ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.a Please describe the support schemes and other measures currently in place that are applied to promote energy from renewable sources and report on any developments in the measures used with respect to those set out in your National Renewable Energy Action Plan (Article 22(1)(b) of Directive 2009/28/EC) ..................... 18 2.b Please describe the measures in ensuring the transmission and distribution of electricity produced from renewable energy sources and in improving the regulatory framework for bearing and sharing of costs related to grid connections and grid reinforcements (for accepting greater loads).
    [Show full text]
  • The Muslim-Turkish Minority in Bulgaria
    BULGARIAN HELSINKI COMMITTEE MEMBER OF THE INTERNATIONAL HELSINKI FEDERATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS The Human Rights of Muslims in Bulgaria in Law and Politics since 1878 Sofia November 2003 Contents: Brief Introductory Chapter: 1. Demographic data 2. Origins of the Bulgarian Muslims 2.1. Turks 2.2. Bulgarian-speaking Muslims (Pomaks) 2.3. Roma Muslims Chapter I: The Muslim community in post-Ottoman Bulgaria (1878 - 1944) 1.1. Religious rights 1.2. Immigration and assimilation problems 1.3. Muslim minority education 1.4. Muslim (Turkish) minority press 1.5. The impact of Kemalism on the rights of the Muslims in Bulgaria Chapter II: The Muslim community during the Communist era (1944 - 1989) and the first years of democracy in Bulgaria 2.1. The politics towards Muslims in the period 1944-1956 2.1.1. Legal basis of Muslims’ religious freedoms 2.1.2. Development of Muslim minority education 2.1.3. Immigration inclinations among Muslims and their consequences 2.2. The treatment of Muslims between 1956 and 1984 2.2.1. Limiting the religious freedoms and launching a policy of forced assimilation of Muslims 2.2.2. Renewed immigration waves 2.2.3. New forced assimilation of Pomak Muslims 2.2.4. Preparing the soil for the assimilation of the Turks and the Roma Muslims 2.3. The situation of the Bulgarian Muslims during the last years of the Communist regime (1984-1989) 2.3.1. The “Revival Process” in its apogee 2.3.2. The international reaction to the “Revival Process” 2.3.3. The “Big Excursion” phenomenon Chapter III: Protection of Muslims’ basic rights and freedoms in present day Bulgaria 3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • (EU) 2021/335 of 23 February 2021 Amending the Annex To
    25.2.2021 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Uni on L 66/5 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2021/335 of 23 February 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1809 concerning certain protective measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States (notified under document C(2021) 1386) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary checks applicable in intra-Union trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC (3), and in particular Article 63(4) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1809 (4) was adopted following outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in holdings where poultry or other captive birds were kept in certain Member States and the establishment of protection and surveillance zones by those Member States in accordance with Council Directive 2005/94/EC. (2) Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1809 provides that the protection and surveillance zones established by the Member States listed in the Annex to that Implementing Decision, in accordance with Directive 2005/94/EC, are to comprise at least the areas listed as protection and surveillance zones in that Annex.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria: Canned Fruits Market
    Bulgaria: Canned fruits Market 30 of January, 2017 GOBAL TRENDS Global Canned Food market growth In 2015 the market size of the subsector Processing and canning of fruits and vegetables, without ready meals features is $ 75.49 USD billion. On annual base the market growth rate is 2.94%. According to the forecasts made by Technavio, the Market f Processing and canning of fruits and vegetables, without ready meals features, will continue to grow and by 2020 its market size will be $ 87.68 USD billion, which is 3.1% Market growth rate for five years. For this consumption growth there are two main reasons: the economic crises, and the lack of time. Highlights Revenue in the global canned food market is likely to grow at a CAGR of 3.04% during 2016- 2020. The demand for convenience is the primary growth factor in the market. In 2015, Europe dominated the global canned food market. In 2015, supermarkets and hypermarkets registered the highest sale of canned food, in terms of revenue Asia Pacific In Asia Pacific region (APAC), product innovations and increases in consumers' disposable incomes factor significantly in the purchase decisions of consumers. Global Market size and forecast The canned food market in Europe was valued at $38.9 billion in 2015 and will reach $45.3 billion by 2020, growing at a CAGR of 3.09%. Though the canned food market in Europe is growing at a steady rate, it is slower than the markets in other regions. However, a rise in consumption is expected in Central and Eastern United Bulgarian Bank European countries.
    [Show full text]
  • WWO Bulgaria Annual Report 2017
    WWO Bulgaria Annual Report 2017 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS YEAR IN REVIEW ...................................................................................................................................................................... 2 PROGRAMS ............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 OPERATIONAL CONTEXT ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 TARGET POPULATION ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 INTERVENTIONS AND IMPACT ............................................................................................................................................ 8 PARTNERSHIPS .................................................................................................................................................................. 22 LESSONS LEARNED AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE ................................................................................... 28 CAPACITY BUILDING .......................................................................................................................................................... 30 MONITORING AND EVALUATION .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage
    Chapter 17: Cultural Heritage URS-EIA-REP-202375 Table of Contents 17 Cultural Heritage ...................................................................................... 17-1 17.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 17-1 17.2 Scoping ............................................................................................................ 17-2 17.3 Spatial and Temporal Boundaries ........................................................................ 17-4 17.3.1 Terrestrial Cultural Heritage Study and Survey Areas ............................... 17-4 17.3.2 Marine Cultural Heritage Study and Survey Areas ................................... 17-5 17.4 Baseline Data .................................................................................................. 17-21 17.4.1 Methodology and Data ........................................................................ 17-21 17.4.2 Secondary Data .................................................................................. 17-21 17.4.2.1 Desk-based Research .................................................................. 17-21 17.4.2.2 Reporting Methodology ............................................................... 17-23 17.4.2.3 Stakeholder Engagement ............................................................. 17-23 17.4.3 Data Gaps .......................................................................................... 17-25 17.4.4 Primary Data/Baseline Surveys ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    EUROPEAN UNION European Regional Operational Programme Regional Development Development Fund www.bgregio.eu Investing in your future! The project is financed by the European Regional Development Fund and the state budget of the Republic of Bulgaria Final Report Impact evaluation of the interventions under Operational Programme Regional Development 2007-2013 and their contribution to the implementation of horizontal policies of the EU Sofia, June 2015 Impact evaluation of the interventions under Operational Programme Regional Development 2007-2013 and their contribution to the EUROPEAN UNION implementation of horizontal policies of the EU European Regional Development Fund Contents CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 2 LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ 5 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................. 7 GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS ........................................................................................ 10 ABOUT THE CONSULTANT ......................................................................................... 11 SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 12 I. INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment Report
    CONSORTIUM DICON – ACCIONA ING. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT for Investment Proposal: BUILDING A NEW NUCLEAR UNIT OF THE LATEST GENERATION AT THE KOZLODUY NPP SITE CHAPTER 3: DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS OF COMPONENTS AND FACTORS OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND CULTURAL HERITAGE THAT SHALL BE LARGELY AFFECTED BY THE INVESTMENT PROPOSAL AND THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THEM 3.5. LANDSCAPE 3.6. BIODIVERSITY 3.7. WASTE 3.8. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES original copy NELLY GROMKOVA – TL PREPARED BY: VERSION: 03 VERJINIA DIMITROVA – PM VALIDATED BY: TZVETANKA DIMITROVA – TQ CONTROL EXPERT DATE: AUGUST 2013 DOCUMENT: EIAR FOR IP BUILDING A NEW NUCLEAR UNIT OF THE LATEST GENERATION CONSORTIUM AT THE KOZLODUY NPPSITE DICON – ACCIONA ING. VERSION 03 DATE: AUGUST 2013 PAGE: 2/122 CONTENTS 3 DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS OF COMPONENTS AND FACTORS OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND CULTURAL HERITAGE THAT SHALL BE LARGELY AFFECTED BY THE INVESTMENT PROPOSAL AND THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THEM .......................................................................................................................................... 5 3.5 LANDSCAPE ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 3.5.1 LANDSCAPE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ...................................................................................................................................... 6 3.5.2 LANDSCAPES ON THE TERRITORY OF KOZLODUY NPP ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]