DOCSLIB.ORG

Inhibition of Aurora-B Kinase Activity by Poly(ADP-Ribosyl)Ation in Response to DNA Damage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inhibition of Aurora-B Kinase Activity by Poly(ADP-Ribosyl)Ation in Response to DNA Damage Inhibition of Aurora-B kinase activity by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in response to DNA damage Lucia Monaco*†, Ullas Kolthur-Seetharam*†, Romain Loury*, Josiane Me´ nissier-de Murcia‡, Gilbert de Murcia‡, and Paolo Sassone-Corsi*§ *Institut de Ge´ne´ tique et de Biologie Mole´culaire et Cellulaire, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Sante´et de la Recherche Me´dicale, Universite´Louis Pasteur, B.P. 10142, 67404 Illkirch, Strasbourg, France; and ‡Ecole Supe´rieure de Biotechnologie de Strasbourg, Unite´9003 du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Boulevard Se´bastien Brant, B.P. 10413, 67412 Illkirch Cedex, France Communicated by Pierre Chambon, Institut de Ge´ne´ tique et de Biologie Mole´culaire et Cellulaire, Strasbourg, France, July 22, 2005 (received for review July 1, 2005) The cell cycle-regulated Aurora-B kinase is a chromosomal passen- and cell death. The identification of specific mediators of DNA ger protein that is implicated in fundamental mitotic events, damaging signals, such as ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated) including chromosome alignment and segregation and spindle and ATR (ATM- and Rad3-related) (24), and the deciphering of checkpoint function. Aurora-B phosphorylates serine 10 of histone how they influence the progression through the cell cycle has H3, a function that has been associated with mitotic chromatin greatly improved our understanding of the cellular response to condensation. We find that activation of poly(ADP-ribose) poly- genotoxic agents. merase (PARP) 1 by DNA damage results in a rapid block of H3 Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is an immediate cellular response to ϩ phosphorylation. PARP-1 is a NAD؉-dependent enzyme that plays DNA strand breaks that is catalyzed by NAD -dependent a multifunctional role in DNA damage detection and repair and enzymes, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) (25). PARPs maintenance of genomic stability. Here, we show that Aurora-B catalyze the stepwise addition of ADP-ribose moeities to sub- ϩ physically and specifically associates with the BRCT (BRCA-1 C- strate proteins by using intracellular NAD as source of ADP- terminal) domain of PARP-1. Aurora-B becomes highly poly(ADP- ribose. The PARP family contains several members, although ribosyl)ated in response to DNA damage, a modification that leads Ͼ90% of cellular poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is ascribed to PARP-1 to a striking inhibition of its kinase activity. The highly similar (26), the most active and best-characterized member of the Aurora-A kinase is not regulated by PARP-1. We propose that the PARP family. It is a nuclear protein with DNA damage scanning specific inhibition of Aurora-B kinase activity by PARP-1 contributes activity that is implicated in the maintenance of genomic integ- to the physiological response to DNA damage. rity (27–29), leading to the control of cellular proliferation and carcinogenesis (30). mitosis ͉ poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 ͉ histone H3 ͉ phosphorylation Here, we report that mitotic P-H3͞Ser-10 phosphorylation is drastically reduced upon DNA damage. This event is coupled to the inhibition of the Aurora-B kinase by PARP-1-mediated itosis is a highly orchestrated process that entails a pleth- poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. Our findings establish an intriguing link ora of control mechanisms. Signaling events that coordi- M among DNA damage, chromatin modifications, and regulation nate mitosis induce a wave of protein phosphorylation governed of mitotic events. The NADϩ dependence of PARP-1 enzymatic by the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdc2. After Cdc2 activation, activity may extend the physiological implications of these downstream mitotic controllers are recognized within the fam- observations to the control of cellular metabolism. ilies of Aurora, Polo, and NIMA-related kinases (1). Mitotic ͞ phosphorylation of histone H3 at serine 10 (P-H3 Ser-10) Materials and Methods occurs highly synchronously and is associated with the initiation Cell Cultures. NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblast cells were cultured in of chromosome condensation (2, 3). The kinase implicated in DMEM supplemented with 10% serum and treated with H2O2 this event is Aurora-B, one of the three members of the Aurora (1 mM) for different times. After incubation, cells were collected family of kinases (4–6). and lysed in Laemmli buffer; equal amounts of proteins, deter- The cell cycle-regulated Aurora-B kinase is a chromosomal mined by Coomassie staining, were loaded onto a SDS- passenger protein that has been shown to play essential roles in acrylamide gel and processed for Western blot analysis. When mitosis (7–9). A number of critical proteins have been shown to the PARP-1 inhibitor 3-aminobenzamide (3-AB) (Sigma) was be substrates of Aurora-B, including the myosin II regulatory used, a 3-h pretreatment was performed before adding H2O2. light chain, vimentin, desmin, and GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were isolated by micro- protein) (10–12), which suggests a role for Aurora-B at the dissection of embryos at 13.5 days of gestation resulting from cleavage furrow during cytokinesis. Other targets of Aurora-B in intercrosses between wild-type or mutant mice. The spermato- cytokinetic processes are INCENP (inner-centromere protein) gonial cell line GC-spg1 was purchased from American Type ͞ and ZEN-4 CeMKLP1, as reported in Caenorhabditis elegans Culture Collection. For immunofluorescence analysis, cells were and mammalian cells (13, 14). Interference of Aurora-B activity fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, permeabilized with causes defects in chromosome congression because of its in- 0.2% Triton X-100, blocked with 5% BSA, and then incubated volvement in the regulation of the kinetochore–microtubule overnight with primary antibodies, washed, and revealed with interactions (15–17). secondary FITC- or Cy3-conjugated antibodies. Treatment of Aurora-B and its related kinase Aurora-A (7) are overexpressed cells with 0.1 ␮g͞ml nocodazole was extended for various periods in a number of human tumors, and their ectopic overexpression in as indicated. cultured cells results in cellular transformation, centrosome abnor- malities, and aneuploidy (18–21). Failure of mitotic chromosome segregation leads to aneuploidy that may contribute to cancer Abbreviations: PARP, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; MEF, mouse embryonic fibroblast; onset (22). Therefore, identification of the pathways that control BRCT, BRCA-1 C-terminal; 3-AB, 3-aminobenzamide; IR, ionizing radiation. Aurora-B function is of central importance. †L.M. and U.K.-S. contributed equally to this work. Genotoxic stress causes activation of cellular checkpoints (23), §To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. leading to diverse responses such as cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, © 2005 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA 14244–14248 ͉ PNAS ͉ October 4, 2005 ͉ vol. 102 ͉ no. 40 www.pnas.org͞cgi͞doi͞10.1073͞pnas.0506252102 Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 Immunoprecipitation. GC-spg1 cells and testis from adult mice were homogenized in a lysis buffer (50 mM Hepes, pH 7.4͞100 mM KCl͞0.5% Nonidet P-40͞proteinase and phosphatase in- hibitors) and immunoprecipitated overnight with the following antibodies: anti-rabbit Aurora-A, anti-rat or rabbit Aurora-B, anti-mouse PARP-1, and anti-rabbit IgG. The immunocom- plexes were collected by protein A- or G- Sepharose beads, and bound proteins were washed several times with lysis buffer and eluted with Laemmli buffer to be processed for Western blot. Western Blot Analysis. Protein extracts were separated by SDS- acrylamide and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane; blots were probed with the indicated antibodies and visualized by using the Pierce chemiluminescence detection system. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation Assay. Recombinant Myc-tagged Aurora-B or Aurora-A was expressed in Cos-1 cells and immunoprecipi- tated with anti-Myc monoclonal antibody 9E10 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation assays were performed on the immunoprecipitated proteins in 40 ␮l of reaction buffer (50 mM Tris⅐HCl, pH 8.0͞4 mM MgCl2͞0.2 mM DTT͞2 ␮g/ml DNaseI-activated calf thymus DNA) containing 1 ␮g of purified PARP-1 and 0.3 ␮Ci (1 Ci ϭ 37 GBq) of [32P]-NADϩ for 10 min at 25°C. Proteins were separated by 10% SDS͞PAGE, trans- ferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and analyzed by autoradiog- Fig. 1. Effect of DNA damage on mitotic histone H3 phosphorylation. NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblasts were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% raphy. Subsequently, to evaluate the kinase activity of the ϩ serum, and DNA damage was induced by various means. (A) Western analyses modified Aurora-B, cold NAD was used in the poly(ADP- of Ser-10 H3 phosphorylation in cells treated with H2O2 (1 mM) at different ribosyl)ation assay. times. The protein levels of Aurora-A, Aurora-B, and cyclin B1 were assayed as controls. (B) Cells exposed to IR (6 Gy) or treated with N-nitroso-N-methylurea Aurora-B Kinase Assay. Immunoprecipitated Aurora-B from (2 mM) for 45 min and allowed to recover. (C and D) Analysis of various histone treated and control cells or in vitro poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated modifications upon DNA damage by using 1 mM H2O2 or 6-Gy IR. Antibodies Aurora-B was used in the presence of 5 ␮Ci of [32P]-␥-ATP. One directed against the indicated specific histone modifications were used in microgram of total histones or GST-H3 was used as a substrate Western assays. (E) DNA damage does not influence EGF-induced H3 phos- as indicated. The reaction was carried out for 30 min at 30°C and phorylation. Cells were serum-starved for 24 h and then stimulated with EGF for1hasdescribed in refs. 23–27, in conjunction with 1 mM H2O2 treatment stopped by the addition of Laemmli buffer. Proteins were or not. analyzed by SDS͞PAGE followed by autoradiography. BIOCHEMISTRY Results activated protein kinase 1), and I␬B kinase-␣ (31–33), depending Specific Reduction of Histone H3 Ser-10 Mitotic Phosphorylation in on the cell type and signaling event.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RASSF1A Interacts with and Activates the Mitotic Kinase Aurora-A
    Oncogene (2008) 27, 6175–6186 & 2008 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/08 $32.00 www.nature.com/onc ORIGINAL ARTICLE RASSF1A interacts with and activates the mitotic kinase Aurora-A L Liu1, C Guo1, R Dammann2, S Tommasi1 and GP Pfeifer1 1Division of Biology, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA and 2Institute of Genetics, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany The RAS association domain family 1A (RASSF1A) gene tumorigenesis and carcinogen-induced tumorigenesis is located at chromosome 3p21.3 within a specific area of (Tommasi et al., 2005; van der Weyden et al., 2005), common heterozygous and homozygous deletions. RASS- supporting the notion that RASSF1A is a bona fide F1A frequently undergoes promoter methylation-asso- tumor suppressor. However, it is not fully understood ciated inactivation in human cancers. Rassf1aÀ/À mice how RASSF1A is involved in tumor suppression. are prone to both spontaneous and carcinogen-induced The biochemical function of the RASSF1A protein is tumorigenesis, supporting the notion that RASSF1A is a largely unknown. The homology of RASSF1A with the tumor suppressor. However, it is not fully understood how mammalian Ras effector novel Ras effector (NORE)1 RASSF1A is involved in tumor suppression pathways. suggests that the RASSF1A gene product may function Here we show that overexpression of RASSF1A inhibits in signal transduction pathways involving Ras-like centrosome separation. RASSF1A interacts with Aurora-A, proteins. However, recent data indicate that RASSF1A a mitotic kinase. Surprisingly, knockdown of RASS- itself binds to RAS only weakly and that binding to F1A by siRNA led to reduced activation of Aurora-A, RAS may require heterodimerization of RASSF1A and whereas overexpression of RASSF1A resulted in in- NORE1 (Ortiz-Vega et al., 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • HIPK2 and Extrachromosomal Histone H2B Are Separately Recruited by Aurora-B for Cytokinesis
    Oncogene https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-018-0191-6 ARTICLE HIPK2 and extrachromosomal histone H2B are separately recruited by Aurora-B for cytokinesis 1 1 2 3 2 Laura Monteonofrio ● Davide Valente ● Manuela Ferrara ● Serena Camerini ● Roberta Miscione ● 3 1,2 1 Marco Crescenzi ● Cinzia Rinaldo ● Silvia Soddu Received: 14 November 2017 / Revised: 24 January 2018 / Accepted: 5 February 2018 © The Author(s) 2018. This article is published with open access Abstract Cytokinesis, the final phase of cell division, is necessary to form two distinct daughter cells with correct distribution of genomic and cytoplasmic materials. Its failure provokes genetically unstable states, such as tetraploidization and polyploidization, which can contribute to tumorigenesis. Aurora-B kinase controls multiple cytokinetic events, from chromosome condensation to abscission when the midbody is severed. We have previously shown that HIPK2, a kinase involved in DNA damage response and development, localizes at the midbody and contributes to abscission by phosphorylating extrachromosomal histone H2B at Ser14. Of relevance, HIPK2-defective cells do not phosphorylate H2B 1234567890();,: and do not successfully complete cytokinesis leading to accumulation of binucleated cells, chromosomal instability, and increased tumorigenicity. However, how HIPK2 and H2B are recruited to the midbody during cytokinesis is still unknown. Here, we show that regardless of their direct (H2B) and indirect (HIPK2) binding of chromosomal DNA, both H2B and HIPK2 localize at the midbody independently of nucleic acids. Instead, by using mitotic kinase-specific inhibitors in a spatio-temporal regulated manner, we found that Aurora-B kinase activity is required to recruit both HIPK2 and H2B to the midbody.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aurora B Kinase Activity Is Required for the Maintenance of the Differentiated State of Murine Myoblasts
    Cell Death and Differentiation (2009) 16, 321–330 & 2009 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1350-9047/09 $32.00 www.nature.com/cdd The Aurora B kinase activity is required for the maintenance of the differentiated state of murine myoblasts G Amabile1,2, AM D’Alise1, M Iovino1, P Jones3, S Santaguida4, A Musacchio4, S Taylor5 and R Cortese*,1 Reversine is a synthetic molecule capable of inducing dedifferentiation of C2C12, a murine myoblast cell line, into multipotent progenitor cells, which can be redirected to differentiate in nonmuscle cell types under appropriate conditions. Reversine is also a potent inhibitor of Aurora B, a protein kinase required for mitotic chromosome segregation, spindle checkpoint function, cytokinesis and histone H3 phosphorylation, raising the possibility that the dedifferentiation capability of reversine is mediated through the inhibition of Aurora B. Indeed, here we show that several other well-characterized Aurora B inhibitors are capable of dedifferentiating C2C12 myoblasts. Significantly, expressing drug-resistant Aurora B mutants, which are insensitive to reversine block the dedifferentiation process, indicating that Aurora B kinase activity is required to maintain the differentiated state. We show that the inhibition of the spindle checkpoint or cytokinesis per se is not sufficient for dedifferentiation. Rather, our data support a model whereby changes in histone H3 phosphorylation result in chromatin remodeling, which in turn restores the multipotent state. Cell Death and Differentiation (2009) 16, 321–330; doi:10.1038/cdd.2008.156; published online 31 October 2008 Lineage-restricted cells can be reprogramed to a state Evidence is emerging that the role of Aurora B is not of pluripotency by several different manipulations, including restricted to mitosis and cell division.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of BPR1K871, a Quinazoline Based
    www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/ Oncotarget, 2016, Vol. 7, (No. 52), pp: 86239-86256 Research Paper Discovery of BPR1K871, a quinazoline based, multi-kinase inhibitor for the treatment of AML and solid tumors: Rational design, synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation Yung Chang Hsu1,*, Mohane Selvaraj Coumar2,*, Wen-Chieh Wang1,*, Hui-Yi Shiao1,*, Yi-Yu Ke1, Wen-Hsing Lin1, Ching-Chuan Kuo1, Chun-Wei Chang1, Fu-Ming Kuo1, Pei-Yi Chen1, Sing-Yi Wang1, An-Siou Li1, Chun-Hwa Chen1, Po-Chu Kuo1, Ching- Ping Chen1, Ming-Hsine Wu1, Chen-Lung Huang1, Kuei-Jung Yen1, Yun-I Chang1, John T.-A. Hsu1, Chiung-Tong Chen1, Teng-Kuang Yeh1, Jen-Shin Song1, Chuan Shih1, Hsing-Pang Hsieh1,3 1Institute of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Research, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan, ROC 2Centre for Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, Pondicherry University, Kalapet, Puducherry, India 3Department of Chemistry, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC *These authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Hsing-Pang Hsieh, email: [email protected] Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia, aurora kinase, FLT3, quinazoline, multi-kinase inhibitor Received: July 25, 2016 Accepted: November 07, 2016 Published: November 15, 2016 ABSTRACT The design and synthesis of a quinazoline-based, multi-kinase inhibitor for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and other malignancies is reported. Based on the previously reported furanopyrimidine 3, quinazoline core containing lead 4 was synthesized and found to impart dual FLT3/AURKA inhibition (IC50 = 127/5 nM), as well as improved physicochemical properties. A detailed structure-activity relationship study of the lead 4 allowed FLT3 and AURKA inhibition to be finely tuned, resulting in AURKA selective (5 and 7; 100-fold selective over FLT3), FLT3 selective (13; 30-fold selective over AURKA) and dual FLT3/AURKA selective (BPR1K871; IC50 = 19/22 nM) agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinase-Targeted Cancer Therapies: Progress, Challenges and Future Directions Khushwant S
    Bhullar et al. Molecular Cancer (2018) 17:48 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-018-0804-2 REVIEW Open Access Kinase-targeted cancer therapies: progress, challenges and future directions Khushwant S. Bhullar1, Naiara Orrego Lagarón2, Eileen M. McGowan3, Indu Parmar4, Amitabh Jha5, Basil P. Hubbard1 and H. P. Vasantha Rupasinghe6,7* Abstract The human genome encodes 538 protein kinases that transfer a γ-phosphate group from ATP to serine, threonine, or tyrosine residues. Many of these kinases are associated with human cancer initiation and progression. The recent development of small-molecule kinase inhibitors for the treatment of diverse types of cancer has proven successful in clinical therapy. Significantly, protein kinases are the second most targeted group of drug targets, after the G-protein- coupled receptors. Since the development of the first protein kinase inhibitor, in the early 1980s, 37 kinase inhibitors have received FDA approval for treatment of malignancies such as breast and lung cancer. Furthermore, about 150 kinase-targeted drugs are in clinical phase trials, and many kinase-specific inhibitors are in the preclinical stage of drug development. Nevertheless, many factors confound the clinical efficacy of these molecules. Specific tumor genetics, tumor microenvironment, drug resistance, and pharmacogenomics determine how useful a compound will be in the treatment of a given cancer. This review provides an overview of kinase-targeted drug discovery and development in relation to oncology and highlights the challenges and future potential for kinase-targeted cancer therapies. Keywords: Kinases, Kinase inhibition, Small-molecule drugs, Cancer, Oncology Background Recent advances in our understanding of the fundamen- Kinases are enzymes that transfer a phosphate group to a tal molecular mechanisms underlying cancer cell signaling protein while phosphatases remove a phosphate group have elucidated a crucial role for kinases in the carcino- from protein.
    [Show full text]
  • Epigenetic Regulation of Neurogenesis by Citron Kinase Matthew Irg Genti University of Connecticut - Storrs, [email protected]
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Doctoral Dissertations University of Connecticut Graduate School 12-10-2015 Epigenetic Regulation of Neurogenesis By Citron Kinase Matthew irG genti University of Connecticut - Storrs, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations Recommended Citation Girgenti, Matthew, "Epigenetic Regulation of Neurogenesis By Citron Kinase" (2015). Doctoral Dissertations. 933. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/933 Epigenetic Regulation Of Neurogenesis By Citron Kinase Matthew J. Girgenti, Ph.D. University of Connecticut, 2015 Patterns of neural progenitor division are controlled by a combination of asymmetries in cell division, extracellular signals, and changes in gene expression programs. In a screen for proteins that complex with citron kinase (CitK), a protein essential to cell division in developing brain, I identified the histone methyltransferase- euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferse 2 (G9a). CitK is present in the nucleus and binds to positions in the genome clustered around transcription start sites of genes involved in neuronal development and differentiation. CitK and G9a co-occupy these genomic positions in S/G2-phase of the cell cycle in rat neural progenitors, and CitK functions with G9a to repress gene expression in several developmentally important genes including CDKN1a, H2afz, and Pou3f2/Brn2. The study indicates a novel function for citron kinase in gene repression, and contributes additional evidence to the hypothesis that mechanisms that coordinate gene expression states are directly linked to mechanisms that regulate cell division in the developing nervous system. Epigenetic Regulation Of Neurogenesis By Citron Kinase Matthew J. Girgenti B.S., Fairfield University, 2002 M.S., Southern Connecticut State University, 2004 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Connecticut 2015 ii Copyright by Matthew J.
    [Show full text]
  • Jadomycin B, an Aurora-B Kinase Inhibitor Discovered Through Virtual Screening
    2386 Jadomycin B, an Aurora-B kinase inhibitor discovered through virtual screening Da-Hua Fu,1 Wei Jiang,1 Jian-Ting Zheng,2 Jadomycin B is a new Aurora-B kinase inhibitor worthy of Gui-Yu Zhao,1 Yan Li,1 Hong Yi,1 Zhuo-Rong Li,1 further investigation. [Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7(8):2386–93] Jian-Dong Jiang,1 Ke-Qian Yang,2 Yanchang Wang,3 and Shu-Yi Si1 Introduction In mammals, there are three Aurora kinases, Aurora-A, B, 1Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and 2Institute and C, which display >60% sequence identity (1). Although of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; the catalytic domains of the three kinases are highly and 3Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, conserved, they show distinct subcellular localization and Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida biological function (2, 3). Aurora-A, which is required for centrosome maturation and separation, localizes to centro- somes from early S phase to late M phase (4). Aurora-B is a Abstract component of chromosomal passenger complex, whose Aurora kinases have emerged as promising targets for function in mitosis has been extensively studied. In cancer therapy because of their critical role in mitosis. addition to Aurora-B, the chromosomal passenger complex These kinases are well-conserved in all eukaryotes, and contains Survivin, Borealin, and inner centromere protein IPL1 gene encodes the single Aurora kinase in budding (5–7). The chromosomal passenger complex associates yeast. In a virtual screening attempt, 22 compounds were with centromeric regions of chromosomes in the early identified from nearly 15,000 microbial natural products as stages of mitosis, but it translocates to microtubules after potential small-molecular inhibitors of human Aurora-B the onset of anaphase.
    [Show full text]
  • Catch and Release: How Do Kinetochores Hook the Right Microtubules During Mitosis?
    TIGS-1107; No. of Pages 10 Review Catch and release: how do kinetochores hook the right microtubules during mitosis? Krishna K. Sarangapani and Charles L. Asbury Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Sport fishermen keep tension on their lines to prevent microtubule tips, thereby harnessing the dynamics of the hooked fish from releasing. A molecular version of this filaments to produce force and movement. Accurate mitosis angler’s trick, operating at kinetochores, ensures accu- requires all kinetochores to become properly ‘bioriented’, racy during mitosis: the mitotic spindle attaches ran- with replicated sister chromatids attached to opposite domly to chromosomes and then correctly bioriented sides of the spindle (or with homologous chromosomes attachments are stabilized due to the tension exerted on attached to opposite sides during the first meiotic division them by opposing microtubules. Incorrect attachments, of gametogenesis). Dietz [1] was the first to recognize that which lack tension, are unstable and release quickly, chromosomes repeatedly reorient on the spindle, in a trial- allowing another chance for biorientation. Stabilization and-error process that ceases only when proper biorienta- of molecular interactions by tension also occurs in other tion is achieved because only this arrangement is stable physiological contexts, such as cell adhesion, motility, [2,3]. Dietz also suggested a possible cause for this differ- hemostasis, and tissue morphogenesis. Here, we review ential stability: mechanical tension. Bioriented chromo- models for the stabilization of kinetochore attachments somes come under tension and their sister kinetochores with an eye toward emerging models for other force- are stretched apart by opposing spindle forces, whereas activated systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Dual PDK1/Aurora Kinase a Inhibitors Reduce Pancreatic Cancer Cell Proliferation and Colony Formation
    cancers Article Dual PDK1/Aurora Kinase A Inhibitors Reduce Pancreatic Cancer Cell Proliferation and Colony Formation 1, 1, 2 3 3 Ilaria Casari y, Alice Domenichini y, Simona Sestito , Emily Capone , Gianluca Sala , Simona Rapposelli 2 and Marco Falasca 1,* 1 Metabolic Signalling Group, School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Bentley 6102, Australia; [email protected] (I.C.); [email protected] (A.D.) 2 Department of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Via Bonanno, 6, 56126 Pisa, Italy; [email protected] (S.S.); [email protected] (S.R.) 3 Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Orali e Biotecnologiche, University “G. d’Annunzio” di Chieti-Pescara, Center for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), 66100 Chieti, Italy; [email protected] (E.C.); [email protected] (G.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-8-92669712 These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 8 October 2019; Accepted: 28 October 2019; Published: 31 October 2019 Abstract: Deregulation of different intracellular signaling pathways is a common feature in cancer. Numerous studies indicate that persistent activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway is often observed in cancer cells. 3-phosphoinositide dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1), a transducer protein that functions downstream of PI3K, is responsible for the regulation of cell proliferation and migration and it also has been found to play a key role in different cancers, pancreatic and breast cancer amongst others. As PI3K is being described to be aberrantly expressed in several cancer types, designing inhibitors targeting various downstream molecules of PI3K has been the focus of anticancer agent development for a long time.
    [Show full text]
  • CHK2 Is Negatively Regulated by Protein Phosphatase 2A
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 5-31-2010 CHK2 is Negatively Regulated by Protein Phosphatase 2A Alyson Freeman University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, and the Biology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Freeman, Alyson, "CHK2 is Negatively Regulated by Protein Phosphatase 2A" (2010). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/3443 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHK2 is Negatively Regulated by Protein Phosphatase 2A by Alyson K. Freeman A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Cancer Biology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Alvaro N. A. Monteiro, Ph.D. Gary W. Litman, Ph.D. Gary W. Reuther, Ph.D. Kenneth L. Wright, Ph.D. Date of Approval: January 14, 2010 Keywords: DNA damage response, phosphorylation, kinase, ionizing radiation, DNA double-strand break © Copyright 2010, Alyson K. Freeman DEDICATION To my husband Scott N. Freeman, my parents James P. and Carolyn C. Fay, and my sister Erin M. Fay. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I first and foremost would like to thank my mentor, Dr. Alvaro Monteiro. I could not have asked for a better experience in graduate school and I am grateful for all that I have learned from him.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for Identification of Actionable Cancer Genome
    A framework for identification of actionable cancer genome dependencies in small cell lung cancer Martin L. Sosa,b,c,d,1,2, Felix Dietleina,b,1, Martin Peifera,b, Jakob Schöttlea,b, Hyatt Balke-Wanta,b, Christian Müllera,b, Mirjam Kokera,b, André Richterse,f, Stefanie Heyncka,b, Florian Malchersa,b, Johannes M. Heuckmanna,b, Danila Seidela,b, Patrick A. Eyersg, Roland T. Ullrichb, Andrey P. Antonchickh, Viktor V. Vintonyakh, Peter M. Schneideri, Takashi Ninomiyaj, Herbert Waldmanne,h, Reinhard Büttnerk, Daniel Rauhe,f, Lukas C. Heukampk, and Roman K. Thomasa,b,k,2 aDepartment of Translational Genomics, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany; bMax Planck Institute for Neurological Research, 50931 Cologne, Germany; cHoward Hughes Medical Institute, dDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158; eChemical Genomics Center of the Max Planck Society, 44227 Dortmund, Germany; fTechnical University Dortmund, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany; gYorkshire Cancer Research (YCR) Institute for Cancer Studies, Cancer Research United Kingdom (CR-UK)/YCR Sheffield Cancer Research Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2RX, United Kingdom; hMax Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany; iInstitute of Forensic Medicine, University of Cologne, 50823 Cologne, Germany; jDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 700-8558 Okayama, Japan; and kInstitute of Pathology, University of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany Edited by Peter K. Vogt, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, and approved September 11, 2012 (received for review April 30, 2012) Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for about 15% of all lung and “synthetic lethality” have emerged (15–19).
    [Show full text]
  • Function and Regulation of Aurora/Ipl1p Kinase Family in Cell Division
    Cell Research (2003); 13(2):69-81 http://www.cell-research.com Function and regulation of Aurora/Ipl1p kinase family in cell division 1 1 1 1,2, YU WEN KE , ZHEN DOU , JIE ZHANG , XUE BIAO YAO * 1 Laboratory for Cell Dynamics, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China 2 Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA ABSTRACT During mitosis, the parent cell distributes its genetic materials equally into two daughter cells through chromosome segregation, a complex movements orchestrated by mitotic kinases and its effector proteins. Faithful chromosome segregation and cytokinesis ensure that each daughter cell receives a full copy of genetic materials of parent cell. Defects in these processes can lead to aneuploidy or polyploidy. Aurora/Ipl1p family, a class of conserved serine/threonine kinases, plays key roles in chromosome segregation and cytokinesis. This article highlights the function and regulation of Aurora/Ipl1p family in mitosis and provides potential links between aberrant regulation of Aurora/Ipl1p kinases and pathogenesis of human cancer. Key words: Aurora (Ipl1p), mitosis, and cancer. INTRODUCTION among species, the regulatory machinery is conserved from yeast to human. One of most conserved regu- Cell is a fundamental unit of life that is relayed lators is serine/theronine protein kinase superfam- via mitosis. The essence of mitosis is to segregate ily that alters the function of its effectors via protein parental genomes encoded in sister chromatides into phosphorylation. Entry into mitosis is driven by pro- two daughter cells, such that each of them inherits tein kinases while initiation of exit from mitosis is one complete copy of genome.
    [Show full text]