The Hamites and Semites in the Tenth Chapter of Genesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Hamites and Semites in the Tenth Chapter of Genesis ‘ f- é M — M T S JASTROW THE H AMITES AND SE I E . THE H AMIT ES AND SEMIT ES IN THE T ENT H CH AP T ER OF GENESIS. B A W R ! M ORRIS J ST RO , J . ( Read April 4, The ro th chapter of Genesis is generally admitted to be one of the most remarkable but also one of the most puzzlin g documents of of antiquity . Scholars have been engaged ever since the days ’ the Talmud and of Eusebius in attempts to identify the n ations named in the chapter and in endeavors to determine the point of view from which the division of n ations has been made and to ascertain the character of the underlying ethnological and e th no if e graphical scheme , there be one in the chapt r . Modern research , has aided to a certain extent by ancient tradition , succeeded in t f r f 2 iden i ying a large numbe o the nations enumerated , but the attempts to discover any system in the groupin g ofthe nations have failed chiefly because of the erroneous assumption that an ancient document could give evidence either of scien tific accuracy or of a ethnological fi n ess e . An adequate conception of what re lly con stituted a nation lay beyond the mental horizon of the an cient ’ G e s i n r n ! . ofs x t or a t a . F a parti l bibliography se e D illm an n s e n s (E gl . s i h ed Ed n ur . 2 For th e T a m ud a v ws an d n t fi at n s se e i b gh , p 3 5 . l ic l ie ide i c io ' ’ — N u au r L a Ge o ra nze d a l a a . 2 1 2 a T nm P r s . e b e , g p ( i , pp 4 4 9 3 Se e for recen t ex position s th e commentari es of Gunkel Holz inger Strack and D ri ve r ( 1 903) to the chapter in question ; also S r d r Cu n e i orm In s cr n d fi e es ta men t L n n a t on s a t ld T Vol . ch e , f ip i O ( o do , ' ' ’ ' ' 6 1 — 0 an a Sk z z e ae r o e u n a Ges c/ ue nte A a bze n s . 1 d s r i Ge r nz r i , pp 3 ; Gl e , g ap , ii ’ r i n a s . 26 to 28 T h e a t r in A fr d r m as D as A lt e (Be l , ch p . ch p e l e Je e i ’ — Tes ta m e n t in: L ze nte des Alte n Or ie n ts L z . 1 1 0 is to ( eip ig, pp 4 5 7 , be especially recommen ded as the latest summary of accepted iden tifications and aus of its va ua s u m ntar stat m n ts an d su st n s t ward h e bec e l ble pple e y e e , gge io o t s ut n of th e man r ms in th e l oth a t r of n s s . A s r us f t ol io y p oble ch p e Ge e i e io de ec , ’ w v r of e re mias t atm n of h h a r is his fa r to ak suffi ho e e , I re e t t e c pte ilu e t e ciently nt a u n t its m s t ara t r ns st n as it d s of two st n t u i o cco co po i e ch c e , co i i g, oe , di i c doc m nts to t r w t m an ss s and n s rt ns T hus w at s a s a ut t e ge he i h y glo e i e io . , h he y bo h e ! s u s d Ara an r n ofN mr 1 8 fa s to the r und ifv rs s - 1 ppo e bi o igi i od (p. 5 ) ll g o e e 8 2 are recogn iz ed as an addition that stands in n o connection with verse 7 ; nor ’ d s r m as n a w lk r a 1 oe Je e i ge er l vie of th e Va e t fe l as a u n it ( p . 4 5 ) commend ts fin th e i t ofth e r t a ana s s ofth e a t i el l gh c i ic l ly i ch p er. J AST ROW— TH E H AMITES AND SEMITES f o . f world , certainly the ancient Orient Apart rom a certain instinct— to speak in de finite ly— which correctly led a people to predicate its own closer or remoter relationship to others , reliance s of was placed on more or le s uncertain traditions , and the value such tradition “(as still further diminished by the subjective factors— a ’ s s — people likes and dislikes , its experiences and ambition that ' ' e n te red ats elements into its formation ; and when we pass beyond i of the immed ate political environment an ancient people , we must be prepared for a nebulousness of views that is almost inconce iv able to a modern mind and for i nconsistencies that are as bewil . of dering as they are numerous In view this , it is evident that the critical analysis of the chapter to which modern scholarship has devoted itselfwith marked success is insuffi cient for a solution of the problems involved unle ss it also takes into account the uncriti cal attitude of the ancient world toward ethnological and geo graphical data . The critical analysis of the 1 0th chapter of Genesis has reached t e a stage that may, with reasonable cer ainty , be regarded as d finite 1 and as having attained its utmost limits . O f the two documents combined to form the present Volkertafel— to use the convenient — f of dis German term the one that orms part the Priestly Code , in uishe d f f e t g by critics as P, orms the chie elem nt , as is the case 2 r of throughout the fi st eleven chapters Genesis , while the other, off designated as J , has only been drawn upon to the extent urnish m ing supplementary data, though at ti es those supplementary data rn ishe s exceed in length the account in P , and , occasionally, q i of A f . material , l ke the story Cain and bel , not ound in P at all In h as of ro h t e c e the t chapter, while I is actually longer than P, yet the latter document represents a far closer approach to a syste as m m matic arrangement , where J , arked by any glosses, is extracted in so arbitrary a fashion in order to supplement P that it is difi cult to obtain an accurate view of the system followed by the “ J in f document its original orm . ff When the two documents are placed side by side , the di erences between them will become clear . 1 om os o de ex e s d cd 1 8 We lhause n C iti n s teu . l H a n . , p (3 , 99, pp 4 ’ 2 - - s Ur ese irnte s 6 6 and a s . 2 1 1 u n . B dde g . pp 4 99 o" pp. 4 4 4 5 . l o pp 5 53 , where th e Jahwistic source in th e fi rst eleven chapte rs of Gen esis is put t r toge he . — T JASTROW THE H A MITES AND SEMI ES . O J. 1 0 t o T s are th e n rat n of 1 8 T he s ns f N a t at w nt , ( ) he e ge e io s 9 , ( ) o o o h h e the s ns of N a S m am an d f rt of the ark w r Sh m Ham and o o h ; he , H o h e e e , a t 2 Th e so ns f a t ss : a a H a m is e a t/zer J phe h . ( o Japheth J phe h (glo n th f ‘ w r m r o Mada avan T u o Ca n aa n . 1 T s t r w r th e e e Go e , g, i, J , f ) ( 9) he e h ee e e bal M s T s ns and ras . Th of N a an d of t m was th e , e hech i ( 3 ) e o o h ; he sons of m r w r As naz Ri w art v rs r ad 1 0 1 b Go e e e hke , p hole e h o e p e ( , at and T arma Th e ns of to t m sons w r b rn aft r th e h h og h .
Recommended publications
  • Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 by H
    Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 by H. C. Leupold Christian Classics Ethereal Library About Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 by H. C. Leupold Title: Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 URL: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/leupold/genesis.html Author(s): Leupold, Herbert Carl (1892-1972) Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Print Basis: The Wartburg Press, 1942 Rights: Copyright Christian Classics Ethereal Library Date Created: 2005-10-07 Status: This document would benefit from proofreading. The Greek text needs to be corrected. CCEL Subjects: All; Bible; LC Call no: BS1151.B3 LC Subjects: The Bible Old Testament Works about the Old Testament Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 H. C. Leupold Table of Contents About This Book. p. ii Title Page. p. 1 Introduction. p. 2 Chapter 1. p. 19 Chapter 2. p. 55 Chapter 3. p. 76 Chapter 4. p. 102 Chapter 5. p. 126 Chapter 6. p. 138 Chapter 7. p. 158 Chapter 8. p. 169 Chapter 9. p. 179 Chapter 10. p. 194 Chapter 11. p. 208 Chapter 12. p. 220 Chapter 13. p. 235 Chapter 14. p. 243 Chapter 15. p. 257 Chapter 16. p. 267 Chapter 17. p. 277 Chapter 18. p. 289 Chapter 19. p. 297 Chapter 20. p. 310 Chapter 21. p. 318 Chapter 22. p. 330 Chapter 23. p. 343 Chapter 24. p. 352 Chapter 25. p. 369 Chapter 26. p. 384 Chapter 28. p. 407 Chapter 29. p. 416 Chapter 30. p. 428 Chapter 31. p. 442 Chapter 32. p. 459 Chapter 33. p. 472 iii Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 H.
    [Show full text]
  • “Your Kingdom Come, Your Will Be Done” (6:10) Prayer •“Every Great Movement of God Can Be Traced Back to a Kneeling Christian.” —Dwight L
    MY KINGDOM GO “Your kingdom come, your will be done” (6:10) Prayer •“Every great movement of God can be traced back to a kneeling Christian.” —Dwight L. Moody Matthew 6:10 “Your kingdom come, your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.” (ESV) Luke 17:20-21 “Being asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, he answered them, ‘The kingdom of God is not coming in ways that can be observed, nor will they say, ‘Look, here it is!’ or ‘There!’ for behold, the kingdom of God is in the midst of you.’” (ESV) Colossians 1:5-6, 13-14 “Of this you have heard before in the word of the truth, the gospel, which has come to you ... He has delivered us from the domain of darkness and transferred us to the kingdom of his beloved Son, in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins.” (ESV) God’s Kingdom •“To pray that his kingdom may come is to pray both that his church will grow on earth now, and that he will return in glory later to take his people to his eternal kingdom. It has both a present and future reality.” —John R.W. Stott ACKNOWLEDGE THE RULE OF THE KING “YOUR Kingdom come …” God’s Will Is … •God’s will is for our highest good. •God’s will is what is in our best interest. •God’s will is that we become what he created us to be. •God’s will is to turn evil into good. •God wants what is the best in our lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Dating the Tower of Babel Events with Reference to Peleg and Joktan
    JOURNAL OF CREATION 31(1) 2017 || PAPERS Dating the Tower of Babel events with reference to Peleg and Joktan Andrew Sibley This paper discusses and seeks to identify the date of the Babel event from the writing of biblical and extra-biblical sources. This is a relevant question for creationists because of questions about the timing of post-Flood climatic changes and human migration. Sources used include the Masoretic Text, the Samaritan Pentateuch, the Septuagint, and the Book of Jubilees, and related historical commentaries. Historical sources suggest that the Babel dispersion occurred in the time of Joktan’s extended family and Peleg’s life. The preferred solution of this paper is to follow the Masoretic Text and the Seder Olam Rabbah commentary that places the Babel event 340 years post-Flood at Peleg’s death. Other texts of the Second Temple period vary from this by only three to six decades, which lends some support to the conclusion. his paper seeks to identify the date of the Babel incident “These are the clans of the sons of Noah, according Twith reference to events in the life of Eber’s sons, Peleg to their genealogies, in their nations, and from these and Joktan. Traditionally the Babel event is associated the nations spread abroad on the earth after the flood.” with a division (Genesis 10:25) in the life of Peleg, and this The problem is that even if Joktan was the elder traditional understanding, relating to confusion of languages brother (which is doubtful because the name implies lesser and demographic scattering, is accepted here.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genesis 10 Table of Nations and Y-Chromosomal DNA Richard P
    Last updated: 18-May-2020 at 17:08 (See History.) Bible chronology main page © Richard P. Aschmann The Genesis 10 Table of Nations and Y-Chromosomal DNA Richard P. Aschmann (Aschmann.net/BibleChronology/Genesis10.pdf) Table of Contents 1. Two Family Trees Making the Same Claim ............................................................................................ 3 2. First Obvious Difficulty: Different Origin Point and Tree Shape ........................................................... 3 3. What the Table of Nations Tells Us ........................................................................................................ 4 3.1. Individuals or Nations? ........................................................................................................................ 4 3.2. How Complete is the Table? ................................................................................................................ 5 4. Successful Matches between the Two Family Trees ............................................................................... 5 4.1. Shem .................................................................................................................................................... 5 4.2. Ham ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 4.3. The Semitic Conundrum ...................................................................................................................... 6 4.4. Japheth
    [Show full text]
  • The Line of Noah Noah’S Three Sons
    [I am still working on this project; right now the PDF views better than the html document] The Line of Noah Noah’s Three Sons I. Shem 1. Elam: Persia (now called Iran) 2. Asshur: [Assyria] 3. Arpachshad (also, Arphaxad): Chaldeans 1) Salah i Eber [Hebrews] (1) Peleg (i) Reu º Serug º Nabor º Terah º Abram (2) Joktan (i) Almodad (ii) Sheleph (iii) Hazarmaveth (iv) Jerah (v) Hadoram (vi) Uzal (vii) Diklah (viii) Obal (ix) Abimael (x) Sheba (xi) Ophir (xii) Havilah (xiii) Joab 4. Lud: [Lydia] 5. Aram 1) Uz [a land of Job? Perhaps 2800 B.C.] 2) Hul 3) Gether 4) Mash II. Ham 1. Cush: Old Ethiopia [Ethiopia] 1) Seba [Meroe] 2) Havilah [Arabia] 3) Sabtah [Sabeans] 4) Raamah [Arabia] i Sheba ii and Dedan 5) Sabteca. 6) Nimrod: Babylon, Erech, Accad, and Calneh in Shinar [Babylonia]. He went from that area to Assyria and built Nineveh, Rehoboth Ir, Calah, and Resen. [Babylon, Ninevah] 2. Egypt (Hebrew = Mizraim): Egypt 1) Ludites (or, Ludim): 2) Anamites (or, Anamim): 3) Lehabites (or, Lehabim): 4) Naphtuhites (or Naphtuhim): 5) Pathrusites (or, Pathrusim): [Pathros] 6) Casluhites (or, Casluhim): [Philistines] 7) Caphtorites (or, Caphtorum) [Crete] 3. Put (or Phut): Libya; the ancient river Phut is in Libya. 4. Canaan: Palestine; also known today as Israel and Jordan. 1) Sidon: the ancient city Sidon 2) Heth [Hittites, Cathay] 3) Jebusites: Jerusalem 4) Amorites: Canaan 5) Girgashites: Canaan 6) Hivites: Canaan 7) Arkites: Canaan [Phœnicians] 8) Sinites: Canaan [Sino, China] 9) Arvadites: Canaan 10) Zemarites: Canaan 11) Hamathites: Canaan. III. Japheth 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadlai 1100 Rial More Directly, Which Has Been of Interest to Ment of the Ibn Abba¯ S Ascension Discourse (Albany, N.Y
    1099 Hadlai 1100 rial more directly, which has been of interest to ment of the Ibn Abba¯ s Ascension Discourse (Albany, N.Y. 2008). modern scholars since the 19th century (e.g., Gold- ■ Cook, D., “New Testament Citations in the H adīth Litera- ziher: 2 : 346–62). The ḥadīth literature does, at ture and the Question of Early Gospel Translations into Ara- times, refer directly to the Injīl (the Gospel) and the bic,” in The Encounter of Eastern Christianity with Early Islam (ed. E. Grypeou et al.; Leiden 2006) 185–223. ■ Goldziher, Tawrāt (the Torah) (cf. S3:3;5:46 etc.), as well as I., Muslim Studies, 2 vols. (trans. S. M. Stern; Oxford 1971). the Zābūr (Psalms; S 4 : 163; 17 : 55). There are also ■ Khalidi, T., The Muslim Jesus: Sayings and Stories in Islamic references to “the book of Ḥikma” (wisdom; cf. Literature (Cambridge, Mass. 2001). ■ Klar, M., “Stories of S 2 : 129; 3 : 48; 5 : 110), and the ḥadīth literature of- the Prophets,” in The Blackwell Companion to the Qurān (ed. ten uses the term “Book of Wisdom” to refer to bib- A. Rippin; Oxford 2006) 338–49. ■ Kugel, J. L., In Potiphar’s lical material, although this material is not always House: The Interpretive Life of Biblical Texts (Cambridge, Mass. clearly specified and is difficult to trace directly (cf. 1994). ■ Lindsay, J. E., “David Son of Jesse and Muh am- Rippin). There are many ḥadīth that include “say- mad Son of Abd Allāh: Warlords, State Builders, and Para- digms of Piety,” in Essays in Honor of R.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadoram 1. Son of Joktan 2. Son of Tou 3. the Taskmaster Hadrach
    1101 Hadrach 1102 The names in 2 Chr 28 : 12 are not from the 8th cen- Frank/W. L. Reed; Nashville, Tenn./New York 1970) 171– tury BCE, but more probably reflect (Samaritan?) 96. families from the time of the Chronicler. Thomas Römer The name Hadlai is not a very popular name today; however it is used from time to time, espe- 2. Son of Tou cially in the US. A son of Tou king of Hamath (1 Chr 18 : 10) was sent by his father to congratulate David for his vic- Bibliography: ■ Klein, R. W., 2 Chronicles: A Commentary (Hermeneia; Minneapolis, Minn. 2012). ■ Noth, M., Die is- tory against their mutual enemy Hadad-Ezer king raelitischen Personennamen (Hildesheim 1980 [= Stuttgart of Zobah. Instead of Hadoram (“Hadad is exalted”), 11928]). the same person is called Joram (“YHWH is ex- Thomas Römer alted”) in 2 Sam 8 : 9–10. This is either a scribal er- ror or an authentic alternative name, perhaps used for diplomatic reasons. Hadoram Bibliography: ■ Klein, R. W., 1 Chronicles (Minneapolis, Minn. 2006). [Esp. 395] 1. Son of Joktan 3. The Taskmaster Hadoram (MT Hădôrām or Hădōrām) appears in Gen Hadoram (2 Chr 10 : 18 MT Hădōrām; 1 Kgs 12 : 18 10 : 27 as one of the sons of Joktan (10 : 26–30), who MT Ădōrām) is the name of a taskmaster over the is presented as a descendant of Eber, in the so-called forced labor, sent by Rehoboam to the Israelites liv- “table of the nations.” First Chronicles 1 : 20–23 (cf. ing in cities of Judah, who stoned him.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Geography of Arabia, Ancient Or Modern, Under a Generic Name, De- Rived, Like That of Hagarenes Or Agraai, from the Mother of the Race
    'CO Hf\v F*m\V* THE HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY OF ARABIA; OK, THE PATRIARCHAL EVIDENCES OF REVEALED RELIGION : A MEMOIR, WITH ILLUSTRATIVE MAPS; AND AN APPENDIX, CONTAINING TRANSLATIONS, WITH AN ALPHABET AND GLOSSARY, OV THE HAMYARITIC INSCRIPTIONS RECENTLY DISCOVERED IN HADRAMAUT. THE REV. CHARLES FORSTER, B.D. ONE OF THE SIX PREACHERS IN THE CATHEDRAL OF CHRIST, CANTERBURY' '. AND RECTOR OF STISTED, ESSEX : AUTHOR OF " MAHOMETANISM UNVEILED." They call their lands after their own names. Psalm xlix. 11. IN TWO VOLUMES. VOL ' L LONDON: DUNCAN AND MALCOLM, 37. PATERNOSTER-ROW. MDCCCXL1V. HI \W* HPiHI-SfflAI IAIN Over us presided kings far removed from baseness, And stern chastisers of reprobate and wicked men : written And they noted down for us, according to the doctrine of Hebcr, good judgments, in a book, to be kept ; And we believed in miracles, in the resurrection, in the return into the nostrils of the breath of life. Adite inscription, engraven on the rock at Hisn Gnanib. ! were in a book 1 Oh that my words were now written oh that they printed in the rock for ever '. That they were graven with an iron pen, and lead, liveth and that He shall at the latter For I know that my Redeemer ; stand, day, upon shall I see God : And though, after my skin, worms destroy this body, yet, in my flesh, not another. Whom I shall see for myself, and mine eyes shall behold, and JOB. LONDON : Printed by A. SPOTTISWOODE, New-Street-Square. TO HIS GRACE THE ARCHBISHOP OE CANTERBURY. MY LORD, IN submitting the following pages to Your Grace's censure and indulgence (and to whom can the fruits of Oriental studies be inscribed more appropriately, than to the venerated successor of their first and most illustrious patron in this country ?) I would avail myself of the privilege of again publicly addressing you, to say a few words upon the origin and design of the work itself, as well as upon some results most unex- pectedly arrived at, during its progress through the press.
    [Show full text]
  • Noah's Sons Have Families 18 Now the Sons of Noah Who Went out of the Ark Were Shem, Ham, and Japheth
    Timeline of Truth – Genesis 9:18—10:32 – Noah's Sons Have Families 18 Now the sons of Noah who went out of the ark were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. And Ham was the The __________ of the World father of Canaan. 19 These three were the sons of Noah, and from these the whole earth was populated. 20 And Noah began to be a farmer, and he planted a vineyard. Noah Changes __________ The particular Hebrew expression for Noah, “a man of the ground” (“soil”), is thematically juxtaposed with He was a ship builder for the last Adam, who was made “from the ground” (2:7). “Adam” is ʾādām, who was derived from the ʾădāmâ 120+ years! (“ground”), and Noah is ʾîš (“a man”) who toils the ʾădāmâ (“ground”).1 21 Then he drank of the wine and was drunk, and became uncovered in his tent. Ham ______________ Noah 22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brothers outside. Noah becomes a farmer 23 But Shem and Japheth took a garment, laid it on both their shoulders, and went backward and Noah becomes drunk covered the nakedness of their father. Their faces were turned away, and they did not see their father's Noah becomes uncovered nakedness. Ham sees his father’s nakedness 24 So Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done to him. Shem & Japheth cover their father 25 Then he said: "Cursed be Canaan; A servant of servants He shall be to his brethren." Noah curses Canaan (because of 26 And he said: "Blessed be the LORD, The God of Shem, And may Canaan be his servant.
    [Show full text]
  • In Their Role As Geographers, the Old Testament Isra Elites Have Evoked
    CALIFORNIA GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY Volume XXVII, 1987 THE GEOGRAPHICAL HORIZONS OF THE EARLY ISRAELITES: THE TABLE OF NATIONS REVISITED Gordon R. Lewthwaite In their role as geographers, the Old Testament Isra­ elites have evoked some rather different reactions. As Wright and Filson remarked, ''The Bible is unique among the world's scriptures; it is the only one for whose com­ prehension the study of historical geography is basic."l Indeed, Napoleon found the correlation of document and place so compelling that he had the appropriate scriptures read to him in situ throughout his Palestinian campaign.2 Yet, there are surprising lacunae: as Bal y and Tushing­ ham remarked, even the location of sacred Mount Sinai passed from Israel's memory.3 That fact, of course, reflects long severance from a region which was traversed but never settled; and at least until the Exile and far-flung Dispersion, most Israelite geography remained conspic­ uously close to home. A tally of identifiable Old Testa­ ment place names,4 however incomplete, indicates that fully 90 percent were located in the "Holy Land" itself (Figure 1). Yet, for all the allusions to natural phenomena, the regionally varying landscapes of even the homeland are seldom limned with geographical precision; and refer­ ences to distant lands are rarely coupled with an identi- ''Dr. Lewthwaite is Professor of Geography at California State University, N'Jrthridge. 39 40 THE CALIFORNIA GEOGRAPHER I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I L------- .......................... : ........... ...[� I I I MILES I '"" 500 -1 , 400 800 I I(IL0f\1llERS I I l Figure 1: Identifiable Places of the Old Testament fying phrase.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 These Are the Generations of Noah. Noah Was a Righteous Man, Blameless in His Generation
    Genesis 6:9–11:32 Noah and the Flood 9 These are the generations of Noah. Noah was a righteous man, blameless in his generation. Noah walked with God. 10 And Noah had three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth. 11 Now the earth was corrupt in God's sight, and the earth was filled with violence. 12 And God saw the earth, and behold, it was corrupt, for all flesh had corrupted their way on the earth. 13 And God said to Noah, “I have determined to make an end of all flesh, for the earth is filled with violence through them. Behold, I will destroy them with the earth. 14 Make yourself an ark of gopher wood. Make rooms in the ark, and cover it inside and out with pitch. 15 This is how you are to make it: the length of the ark 300 cubits, its breadth 50 cubits, and its height 30 cubits. 16 Make a roof for the ark, and finish it to a cubit above, and set the door of the ark in its side. Make it with lower, second, and third decks. 17 For behold, I will bring a flood of waters upon the earth to destroy all flesh in which is the breath of life under heaven. Everything that is on the earth shall die. 18 But I will establish my covenant with you, and you shall come into the ark, you, your sons, your wife, and your sons' wives with you. 19 And of every living thing of all flesh, you shall bring two of every sort into the ark to keep them alive with you.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Genesis
    The book of Genesis 01_CEB_Childrens_Genesis.indd 1 8/21/14 3:23 PM CEB Deep Blue Kids Bible © 2012 by Common English Bible “Bible Basics” is adapted from Learning to Use My Bible—Teachers Guide by Joyce Brown ©1999 Abingdon Press. “Discovery Central” dictionary is adapted from Young Reader’s Bible Dictionary, Revised Edition © 2000 Abingdon Press. All rights reserved on Deep Blue Notes, Life Preserver Notes, God Thoughts/My Thoughts, Did You Know?, Bet You Can!, and Navigation Point! material. No part of these works may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may expressly be permitted by the 1976 Copyright Act, the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or in writing from the publisher. Requests for permission should be addressed to Common English Bible, 2222 Rosa L. Parks Boulevard, Nashville, TN 37228-1306, or e-mailed to permissions@ commonenglish.com. Copyright © 2011 by Common English Bible The CEB text may be quoted and/or reprinted up to and inclusive of five hundred (500) verses without express written permission of the publisher, provided the verses quoted do not amount to a complete book of the Bible nor account for twenty-five percent (25%) of the written text of the total work in which they are quoted. Notice of copyright must appear on the title or copyright page of the work as follows: “All scripture quotations unless noted otherwise are taken from the Common English Bible, copyright 2011. Used by permission.
    [Show full text]