DOCSLIB.ORG

Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 by H

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 by H Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 by H. C. Leupold Christian Classics Ethereal Library About Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 by H. C. Leupold Title: Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 URL: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/leupold/genesis.html Author(s): Leupold, Herbert Carl (1892-1972) Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Print Basis: The Wartburg Press, 1942 Rights: Copyright Christian Classics Ethereal Library Date Created: 2005-10-07 Status: This document would benefit from proofreading. The Greek text needs to be corrected. CCEL Subjects: All; Bible; LC Call no: BS1151.B3 LC Subjects: The Bible Old Testament Works about the Old Testament Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 H. C. Leupold Table of Contents About This Book. p. ii Title Page. p. 1 Introduction. p. 2 Chapter 1. p. 19 Chapter 2. p. 55 Chapter 3. p. 76 Chapter 4. p. 102 Chapter 5. p. 126 Chapter 6. p. 138 Chapter 7. p. 158 Chapter 8. p. 169 Chapter 9. p. 179 Chapter 10. p. 194 Chapter 11. p. 208 Chapter 12. p. 220 Chapter 13. p. 235 Chapter 14. p. 243 Chapter 15. p. 257 Chapter 16. p. 267 Chapter 17. p. 277 Chapter 18. p. 289 Chapter 19. p. 297 Chapter 20. p. 310 Chapter 21. p. 318 Chapter 22. p. 330 Chapter 23. p. 343 Chapter 24. p. 352 Chapter 25. p. 369 Chapter 26. p. 384 Chapter 28. p. 407 Chapter 29. p. 416 Chapter 30. p. 428 Chapter 31. p. 442 Chapter 32. p. 459 Chapter 33. p. 472 iii Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 H. C. Leupold Chapter 34. p. 479 Chapter 35. p. 497 Chapter 36. p. 507 Chapter 37. p. 516 Chapter 38. p. 525 Chapter 39. p. 533 Chapter 40. p. 541 Chapter 41. p. 549 Chapter 42. p. 561 Chapter 43. p. 571 Chapter 44. p. 581 Chapter 45. p. 587 Chapter 46. p. 594 Chapter 47. p. 604 Chapter 48. p. 615 Chapter 49. p. 624 Chapter 50. p. 648 Indexes. p. 657 Index of Scripture References. p. 657 Index of Scripture Commentary. p. 663 iv Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 H. C. Leupold 1 Exposition of Genesis By H. C. LEUPOLD, D. D Professor of Old testament Exegesis in the Capital University Seminary Colombus, Ohio 3 To the Memory of my FATHER and to my MOTHER Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 H. C. Leupold INTRODUCTION 5 Name of the Book The name universally used in English for this book is "Genesis." This name is a transliteration of the Greek word γένεσις, which constitutes the regular title from of old in the Septuagint and was taken over by Jerome into the VulgateÐLiber Genesis. Luther made a new departure when he substituted in his German Bible the title "The First Book of Moses"Ða designation requiring no further commentary. In the Hebrew Bible the book constitutes the first part of the Pentateuch. As a distinct part it so naturally stands out as a unit that there can be no doubt that it was designed to be just such a unit; and so even criticism from its point of view is ready to accept the division of the Pentateuch as a whole into five parts and that the book of Genesis in particular was a part of it at so early a date as at least four centuries before the Christian era. Though no evidence is available, we are inclined to believe that the Jews discerned the fivefold division of the Pentateuch from the time that the work was put into their hands. They are wont to refer to the book by the title of Bereshith, the very first Hebrew word, meaning: "in the beginning." Author Genesis contains no statement as to who its author was. Yet we hold very definitely to the conviction that , Moses wrote Genesis as well as the rest of the Pentateuch, except (Deut. 34). In our day such a position is regarded as so utterly outmoded that we must indicate, at least briefly, what grounds we have for standing thus. Our grounds are those which have satisfied conservative scholarship in the church throughout the ages. Neither is the group of those who still accept these arguments so inconsiderable as critics would have us believe. The internal evidence of the Pentateuch runs as follows. In Exodus the passages (17:14; 24:4; 34:27), if rightly construed, indicate that Moses wrote more than the specific passages that appear under immediate consideration, in fact, all of Exodus. In like manner the numerous statements of Leviticus to the effect that "the Lord spake unto Moses" ("and unto Aaron"), such as (Le 1:1; 4:1; 6:1, 8, 19, 24; 7:22, 28; 8:1), etc., again, if rightly construed, lead to the same result, in fact, cover Leviticus. For why should the exact nature of the revelation be emphasized, unless it be presupposed that this revelation was immediately conserved in writing in each case? In fact, the assumption that these directions were not committed to writing is most unnatural. The same argument applies to much of what is found in Numbers; but in this book the special portion that came by immediate revelation requires the background of the rest of the historical material of the book. (Nu 33:2) is the only passage that refers to the fact that Moses wrote, a statement inserted at this point in order to stamp even what might seem too unimportant to record as traceable to Moses. In Deuteronomy a comparison of the following passages establishes the Mosaic authorship: (De 1:1; 17:18,19; 27:1-8; 31:9; 31:24). If, then, on the basis of the evidence found in these four books we may very reasonably conclude that they were written by Moses, the conclusion follows very properly that none other than the author of these later four books would have been so suitable as the author for 2 Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 H. C. Leupold Genesis also. Certainly such a conclusion is far more reasonable than that GenesisÐor for that matter the entire PentateuchÐis to be ascribed to another one of these genial Nobodies of whom criticism has a large number in reserve as authors. We shall not now trace down how the Old Testament in its later books historical as well as prophetic strongly supports the idea of the Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch and by implication also of Genesis. The critic, misreading the evidence, misdates all these books, and so the argument means nothing to him. The man who is not affected by critical arguments can find proof more ample than we can here reproduce in the writings of Hengstenberg, Keil, Rupprecht and Moeller. The support that the New Testament lends to our position is singularly strong and, for that matter, even decisive on the whole issue, at least for him who believes in the plenary inspiration of the Scriptures. It is sufficient in these introductory remarks merely to list the major passages as such, passages that all refer to the Mosaic authorship of the whole or of parts of the Pentateuch. In the Gospels we find: (Mt 8:4; 19:7, 8; 23:2; Mk 1:44; 7:10; 10:3, 4; 12:26); (Lu 5:14; 16:29, 31; 20:37; Joh 3:14; 5:45; 6:32; 7:19; 7:22, 23). Aside from these passages which are from the lips of Christ Himself there are the remarks of the evangelists found (Lu 24:27, 44; Joh 1:17). To the apostles must be ascribed the following words: (Ac 3:22; 13:39; 15:1, 5, 21; 26:22; 28:23; Ro 10:5, 19; 1Co 9:9; 2Co 3:15). To attribute ignorance on matters involved in literary criticism to Christ or to inspired apostles is unwarranted assumption. To class Christ's attitude as accommodation to prevalent opinion grows out of failure to apprehend the fact that Christ is absolute Truth. Any two or three of the above passages are sufficient , to indicate to him that weighs their evidence that to Christ and to His apostles the Torah (the Pentateuch) was Mosaic. In answering the question, At what time was Genesis written? we are, of course, entirely, in the field of conjecture. It seems highly probable that the bulk, if not practically all of Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers, was written after the fashion of a kind of journal, especially those parts embodying specific words of direction given by God. This would naturally suggest some introductory work like Genesis, which could.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parshat Va'era
    Canfei Nesharim: Parsha Vaera Parshat Va’era: The Earth is the Lord’s By Dr. David Goldblatt Divine chastisement, brought in the form of affliction and suffering, can be an effective, if undesirable, instrument for individual and social learning. The ten plagues that G-d visits on the Egyptians and their Pharaoh in this week’s portion Va’era (as well as in next week’s portion Bo ) publicly demonstrate G-d’s power to both Egypt and Israel. In the warnings and reproofs accompanying the plagues, G-d and Moses ( Moshe ) use ten variations of the phrase “to know the Lord.” After Pharaoh beseeches Moshe to end the seventh plague of hail, Moshe tells him it will stop once he (Moshe) leaves the city and spreads out his hands to G-d. Moshe admonishes Pharaoh: “That you may know that the earth belongs to the Lord.” 1 This phrase, expressing the dominion of G-d and the limits to humans’ power and control over the earth, has relevance for and resonance with modern man’s place in the world and humanity's role in the current environmental predicament. The plague of hail was qualitatively much harsher than the ones preceding it, and G-d’s forewarning was correspondingly the longest and most severe until then. In this warning, however, was a strong measure of Divine compassion for the Egyptians. G-d urges them to bring in their servants and animals from the field to spare them from destruction. The G-d- fearing among the Egyptians heeded and lived, while the heedless perished.
    [Show full text]
  • Beshalach (When He Sent)
    An Introduction to the Parashat HaShavuah (Weekly Torah Portion) Understanding the Torah From a Thematic Perspective Beshalach (When He Sent) By Tony Robinson Copyright © 2003 (5764) by Tony Robinson, Restoration of Torah Ministries. All rights reserved. —The Family House of Study— Examining the Parashat HaShavuah by Thematic Analysis Welcome to Mishpachah Beit Midrash, the Family House of Study. Each Shabbat1 we gather in our home and study the Scriptures, specifically the Torah.2 It’s a fun time of receiving revelation from the Ruach HaKodesh3. Everyone joins in—adults and children—as we follow the Parashat HaShavuah4 schedule. We devote ourselves to studying the Torah because the Torah is the foundation for all of Scripture. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the Torah will help us more fully understand the rest of the Tanakh5 and the Brit Chadasha.6 Furthermore, as Yeshua stated Himself, the Torah teaches about Him. So we study the Torah in order to be drawn closer to Yeshua, the goal of the Torah. As believers in the Messiah we have discovered the richness of the wisdom of the sages of Israel. These men, who devoted themselves to the study of the Torah, have left us a rich heritage. Part of that heritage is a unique method of learning and interpreting the Scriptures. It’s called thematic analysis. In thematic analysis we search for the underlying theme/topic of each passage of Scripture. By studying Scriptures related by a common theme, line upon line and precept upon precept, the Scriptures open up to us in a unique manner that is clearly inspired by the Ruach HaKodesh.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasha Meditation Bo
    בס”ד Parasha Meditation Bo Shemot 10:1-13:16 By Rebbetzin Chana Bracha Siegelbaum Eradicating our Deepest Fears Introduction: “Come to Pharaoh” – to a Chamber within a Chamber to Confront Your Deepest Fears This week’s parasha opens with Hashem sending Moshe to face Pharaoh, whose heart Hashem 1 Bo el”– בּ ֹא אֶ ל ַפּ רְ ע ֹה has hardened. Hashem said to Moshe: “Come to Pharaoh…!”0F The Hebrew Pharaoh” is usually translated “Go to Pharaoh,” But “Bo” means “come,” not “go.” The Zohar explains why Hashem tells Moshe “Come” rather than “go” to Pharaoh. Rabbi Shimeon said: Now it is time to reveal secrets that are bound above and below. Why does it say, “Come to Pharaoh”? It should have said, “Go to Pharaoh...” But G*d brought Moses into a chamber within a chamber, to the supernal and mighty serpent from which many levels evolve, which Moses feared to approach 2 himself...1F The Spiritual Block of Fear What exactly did Moshe fear and how does Hashem’s prompting him to “come to Pharaoh” relieve this fear? Fear is one of the main spiritual blocks in most people’s lives. In my EmunaHealing introductory class, I address the Three Primal Fears and how to overcome them. We all suffer from various fears both known and especially unknown. Fear is the underlying emotion that affects our unconscious choices and ambitions in so many ways; it even affects our physical health. What makes our fears so detrimental is that they are invisible, and we aren’t always able to define them.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Genesis 10-‐11 Study ID#12ID1337 Alright, Shall We Open Our Bibles
    Genesis 10-11 Study ID#12ID1337 Alright, shall we open our Bibles tonight to Genesis 10. If you're just joining us on Wednesday, you're only nine chapters behind. So you can catch up, all of those are online, they are in video, they are on audio. We are working on translating all of our studies online into Spanish. It'll take awhile, but it's being done. We are also transcribing every study so that you can have a written copy of all that's said. You won't have to worry about notes. It'll all be there, the Scriptures will be there. So that's also in the process. It'll take awhile, but that's the goal and the direction we're heading. So you can keep that in your prayers. Tonight we want to continue in our in-depth study of this book of beginnings, the book of Genesis, and we've seen a lot if you've been with us. We looked at the beginning of the earth, and the beginning of the universe, and the beginning of mankind, and the origin of marriage, and the beginning of the family, and the beginning of sacrifice and worship, and the beginning of the gospel message, way back there in Chapter 3, verse 15, when the LORD promised One who would come that would crush the head of the serpent, preached in advance. We've gone from creation to the fall, from the curse to its conseQuences. We watched Abel and then Cain in a very ungodly line that God doesn't track very far.
    [Show full text]
  • Parshat Lech Lecha 5775
    Dedicated in memory of Rachel Leah bat R' Chaim Tzvi Volume 6 Number 37 Brought to you by Naaleh.com Parshat Lech Lecha: Eternal Call Based on a Naaleh.com shiur by Mrs. Shira Smiles What was it about Avraham that he was us is eternal and not dependent on anything. of his soul that he couldn’t possibly stay alive if chosen to be the father of the Jewish people? But we do know that Avraham was chosen for Hashem’s name was at stake. He understood While the Torah tells us about the righteous his good deeds and we have many statements that the ultimate truth was to give up his life. character traits of Noach, not much is said of in the Torah testifying to this. The Torah says, When he decided to let himself be thrown into Avraham. The Ramban explains that one of “I am Hashem who took you out of Ur Kasdim the furnace, he knew that he could potentially the most pivotal events that showed to give you this land.” The Rambam says be forfeiting his life in the next world for doing Avraham’s extraordinary faith in Hashem was Avraham merited to receive the land of Israel something forbidden. Yet his love for Hashem when he was thrown into the fiery furnace in because of the self sacrifice he displayed at Ur was so great it wasn’t contingent on any Ur Kasdim. The Ibn Ezra asks, why was this Kasdim. How can we say he wasn’t chosen for reward. The Netivot Shalom says, it was not not written in the Torah? The Ramban any reason? And if we say Avraham and the such a wonder that Avraham wasn’t burned in answers that it would have been impossible to Jewish people were chosen randomly, why in Ur Kasdim.
    [Show full text]
  • Parashat Bo the Women Were There Nonetheless …
    WOMEN'S LEAGUE SHABBAT 2016 Dvar Torah 2 Parashat Bo The Women Were There Nonetheless … Shabbat Shalom. In reading Parashat Bo this morning, I am intrigued by the absence of women and their role in the actual preparations to depart Egypt. This is particularly striking because women – Miriam, Moses’ mother Yocheved, the midwives Shifra and Puah, and Pharaoh’s daughter – are so dominant in the earlier part of the exodus story. In fact, the opening parashah of Exodus is replete with industrious, courageous women. Why no mention of them here? And how do we reconcile this difference? One of the ways in which moderns might interpret this is to focus on the context in which God commands Moses and the congregation of Hebrews – that is men – to perform certain tasks as they begin their journey out of Egypt. With great specificity God, through Moses, instructs the male heads of household how to prepare and eat the paschal sacrifice, place its blood on the doorpost, and remove all leaven from their homes. They are told how to ready themselves for a hasty departure. Why such detailed instruction? It is plausible that, like slaves before and after, the Hebrews had scant opportunity to cultivate imagination, creativity and independent thought during their enslavement. The opposite in fact is true, for any autonomous thought or deed is suppressed because the slave mentality is one of absolute submission to the will of his master. So this might account for why the Hebrew slaves required such specific instruction. The implication is that among the downtrodden, the impulse for freedom needs some prodding.
    [Show full text]
  • “Your Kingdom Come, Your Will Be Done” (6:10) Prayer •“Every Great Movement of God Can Be Traced Back to a Kneeling Christian.” —Dwight L
    MY KINGDOM GO “Your kingdom come, your will be done” (6:10) Prayer •“Every great movement of God can be traced back to a kneeling Christian.” —Dwight L. Moody Matthew 6:10 “Your kingdom come, your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.” (ESV) Luke 17:20-21 “Being asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, he answered them, ‘The kingdom of God is not coming in ways that can be observed, nor will they say, ‘Look, here it is!’ or ‘There!’ for behold, the kingdom of God is in the midst of you.’” (ESV) Colossians 1:5-6, 13-14 “Of this you have heard before in the word of the truth, the gospel, which has come to you ... He has delivered us from the domain of darkness and transferred us to the kingdom of his beloved Son, in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins.” (ESV) God’s Kingdom •“To pray that his kingdom may come is to pray both that his church will grow on earth now, and that he will return in glory later to take his people to his eternal kingdom. It has both a present and future reality.” —John R.W. Stott ACKNOWLEDGE THE RULE OF THE KING “YOUR Kingdom come …” God’s Will Is … •God’s will is for our highest good. •God’s will is what is in our best interest. •God’s will is that we become what he created us to be. •God’s will is to turn evil into good. •God wants what is the best in our lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Dating the Tower of Babel Events with Reference to Peleg and Joktan
    JOURNAL OF CREATION 31(1) 2017 || PAPERS Dating the Tower of Babel events with reference to Peleg and Joktan Andrew Sibley This paper discusses and seeks to identify the date of the Babel event from the writing of biblical and extra-biblical sources. This is a relevant question for creationists because of questions about the timing of post-Flood climatic changes and human migration. Sources used include the Masoretic Text, the Samaritan Pentateuch, the Septuagint, and the Book of Jubilees, and related historical commentaries. Historical sources suggest that the Babel dispersion occurred in the time of Joktan’s extended family and Peleg’s life. The preferred solution of this paper is to follow the Masoretic Text and the Seder Olam Rabbah commentary that places the Babel event 340 years post-Flood at Peleg’s death. Other texts of the Second Temple period vary from this by only three to six decades, which lends some support to the conclusion. his paper seeks to identify the date of the Babel incident “These are the clans of the sons of Noah, according Twith reference to events in the life of Eber’s sons, Peleg to their genealogies, in their nations, and from these and Joktan. Traditionally the Babel event is associated the nations spread abroad on the earth after the flood.” with a division (Genesis 10:25) in the life of Peleg, and this The problem is that even if Joktan was the elder traditional understanding, relating to confusion of languages brother (which is doubtful because the name implies lesser and demographic scattering, is accepted here.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genesis 10 Table of Nations and Y-Chromosomal DNA Richard P
    Last updated: 18-May-2020 at 17:08 (See History.) Bible chronology main page © Richard P. Aschmann The Genesis 10 Table of Nations and Y-Chromosomal DNA Richard P. Aschmann (Aschmann.net/BibleChronology/Genesis10.pdf) Table of Contents 1. Two Family Trees Making the Same Claim ............................................................................................ 3 2. First Obvious Difficulty: Different Origin Point and Tree Shape ........................................................... 3 3. What the Table of Nations Tells Us ........................................................................................................ 4 3.1. Individuals or Nations? ........................................................................................................................ 4 3.2. How Complete is the Table? ................................................................................................................ 5 4. Successful Matches between the Two Family Trees ............................................................................... 5 4.1. Shem .................................................................................................................................................... 5 4.2. Ham ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 4.3. The Semitic Conundrum ...................................................................................................................... 6 4.4. Japheth
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis (B'reshiyt 6:9 – 11:32) Introduction: Chapter 6
    NOAH GENESIS (B’RESHIYT 6:9 – 11:32) INTRODUCTION: 1. Because of the wickedness – the mixing and mingling – God determined to blot out all inhabitants of the earth. a. Mankind had corrupted his way and, consequently, corrupted the earth itself. 2. Josephus records that Adam had predicted destruction of world by flood and fire. a. Antiquities of the Jews, Book I, chapter 2, paragraph iii. 3. Lamech named him “Noah” indicating that he would bring “rest,” meaning of name. a. Geneological record in Gen. 5 seems to indicate that he was born in 1056. b. Possibility that he was born in 1058, written in Hebrew as . 4. Noah was the remnant – “he found grace” in the eyes of the LORD; he was righteous, unpolluted and walked with God. a. Noah, like Adam, would be father of mankind after the flood. b. From the beginning, we see that there is always a remnant. c. Apparently, Noah was the ONLY one considered righteous. 5. The flood waters are called “the waters of Noah” in Isaiah 54:9. a. Rabbis deduce that the waters are Noah’s responsibility. b. He had been content to protect his own righteousness by distancing himself. 6. If he had completed responsibility to that generation fully, flood might not have happened. a. Inferring that, ultimately, God’s people are responsible for some events. b. “Sons of God” in Gen. 6 are how narrative begins; ends with corrupted earth. 7. Much is made of fact that Noah “walked with God” but Abraham “before Him.” a. Abraham is considered as spiritually superior to Noah.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lament for Tyre and the King of Tyre
    A Lamentation for Tyre and the King of Tyre Lesson 11: Ezekiel 27-28 November 10, 2019 Ezekiel Outline • 1-33 The wrath of the Lord GOD • 1-24 Oracles of wrath against Israel • 1-3 Revelation of God and • 25-32 Oracles of wrath against the commission of Ezekiel nations • 4-23 Messages of wrath for Jerusalem • 24-33 Messages of wrath during the • 33-48 Oracles of consolation for siege of Jerusalem Israel • 34-48 The holiness of the Lord GOD • 33-37 Regathering of Israel to the land • 34-39 The Restoration of Israel • 38-39 Removal of Israel’s enemies • 40-48 The restoration of the presence from the land of the Lord GOD in Jerusalem • 40-46 Reinstatement of true worship • 47-48 Redistribution of the land Then they will know that I am the LORD 4.5 • Distribution 4 • Significance 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11Israel 12 13 14 15 16 17 20 22 23 24 25 26 28 29 30 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 Israel Then they will know that IamtheLORD willknowthat Then they Israel Israel Israel Israel women of Israel Israel Israel Israel Israel nations Israel Israel Israel Israel Ammon Moab Philistia Tyre Israel Sidon Israel Egypt Egypt nations Egypt Israel Israel Edom Israel nations Israel nations nations Israel nations Gog judgment restoration Chapter 27 Outline • 1-11 Tyre’s former state • 12-25 Tyre’s customers • 26-36 Tyre’s fall Tyre’s former state • A lament for Tyre Ezekiel 27:1-5 • What God says versus what Tyre 1Moreover, the word of the LORD came says to me saying, 2“And you, son of man, take up a lamentation over Tyre; 3and say to Tyre, who dwells at the entrance • Perfect in beauty to the sea, merchant of the peoples to many coastlands, ‘Thus says the Lord GOD, “O Tyre, you have said, ‘I am perfect in beauty.’ 4“Your borders are in the heart of the seas; Your builders have perfected your beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • Nimrod and Esau As Parallel Figures
    215 In Search of Nimrod: Nimrod and Esau as Parallel Figures By: GEULA TWERSKY Introduction This study seeks to arrive at an understanding of the enigmatic character Nimrod, the mythical Assyrian conqueror and builder who plays a prom- inent role in the Genesis accounts of the development of evil after the flood. The methodology for arriving at such an understanding lies in an analysis of the parallel relationship between Nimrod and Esau, and by association, Assyria and Edom, the nation-states that they represent. The research presented here leads to an understanding of Esau/Edom as the literary successor of Nimrod and the Assyrian monarchy that he founded. Nimrod Most academic discussions concerning Nimrod focus on the improbable task of identifying him with an extra-biblical, known historical figure.1 S. 1 Cf. for example, Y. Levin, “Nimrod the Mighty, King of Kish, King of Sumer and Akkad,” VT 52.3 (2002): 350–64; Cf. also Nahum Sarna, Genesis, The JPS Torah Commentary, (ed. N. Sarna; Jerusalem: Jewish Publication Society, 1989), 73, who attempts to identify Nimrod with Naram-Sin; some have argued that Nimrod has his roots in a Mesopotamian deity. This was first suggested by J. Grivel, “Nemrod et les écritures cunéiformes,” Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archaeology 3 (1874), p. 136–144, and revived by E. Lipinski, “Nimrod et Assur,” Revue Biblique 73.1 (1966), p. 77–93, who related Nimrod to Marduk in the Bab- ylonian creation myth Enuma elis, “when on high.” Van der Toorn and P. W. van der Horst, Harvard Theological Review 83.1 (1990), p.
    [Show full text]