DOCSLIB.ORG

Kerr, John Latimer (1991) the Role and Character of the Praetorian Guard and the Praetorian Prefecture Until the Accession of Vespasian

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kerr, John Latimer (1991) the Role and Character of the Praetorian Guard and the Praetorian Prefecture Until the Accession of Vespasian Kerr, John Latimer (1991) The role and character of the praetorian guard and the praetorian prefecture until the accession of Vespasian. PhD thesis. https://theses.gla.ac.uk/875/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] THE ROLE AND CHARACTER OF THE PRAETORIAN GUARD AND THE PRAETORIAN PREFECTURE UNTIL THE ACCESSION OF VESPASIAN JOHN LATIMER KERR PH. D. THESIS DEPARTMENT OF CLASSICS 1991 Lý k\) e" vc %0 t-0 Cn JOHN LATIMER KERR 1991 C0NTENTS. Page Acknowledgements. List of Illustrations. Summary. I The Augustan Guard and its Predecessors. 1 II The Praetorian Guard of Tiberius - AD. 14 to AD. 31. 15 III The Praetorian Guard from the Death of Seianus to the Assassination of Gaius. 41 IV The Praetorian Guard of Claudius. 60 V The Praetorian Guard of Nero. 84 VI The Praetorian Guard from the Death of Nero to the Accession of Vespasian. 116 VII The Praetorian Guard as a Political Force. 141 VIII The Praetorian Guard as a Military Force. 157 IX Prefects and Prefecture. 161 List of Abbreviations. 178 Notes. 180 Bibliography. 272 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The presentation of this study would not have been possible without the help and assistance of my supervisors Dr. M. Green and Dr. L. Keppie. I am deeply grateful to them for their friendliness and for their suggestions which have considerably improved this work. Professor Peter Walsh took time off from his many other duties to read the individual chapters as they were produced. His criticisms were always incisive and invaluable. My research was eased by the advice of Graham Whitaker of Glasgow University Library who facilitated a number of inter-library loans. John Letham guided me through the more difficult German and Italian articles and works which I encountered in my research. For enduring my many idiosyncrasies and for her help in the technical completion of this thesis I am grateful to Ina Milne whose patience and kindness are matched only by her efficiency. Finally, I would like to acknowledge the personal influences which were indispensable to the successful completion of this study. Dr. Ronald Knox first encouraged me, more than twenty years ago, to develop my interest in ancient history. Above all, however, I am indebted to my wife Ann, and my children, Paul, Laura and Alan, who have tolerated so unselfishly the-omnipresence of this project for the last six years. John L. Kerr Lanark November 1991 ILLUSTRATIONS Fig. 1 Relief from the Arch of Claudius (once thought Trajanic) showing guardsmen (Louvre Museum). Fig. 2 Denarii issued by Mark Antony, 33-32 BC. (Crawford 544/1; 544/12). Fig. 3 Praetorian guardsmen in civilian dress: from a frieze of circa AD. 83-5 found under the Palazzo della Cancelleria, Rome (Vatican Museum). Fig. 4 Map of Imperial Rome, showing the location of the castra praetoria. Fig. 5 Sestertius of Gaius, AD. 37-8 (RIC p. 110 no. 32). Fig. 6 (a) Aureus of Claudius with the legend IMPER(ator) RECEPT(us) AD. 41-2 (RIC p. 122 no. 7). (b) Denarius of Claudius with the legend PRAETOR(iani) RECEPT(i) AD. 41-2 (RIC p. 122 no. 12). Fig. 7 (a) Sestertius of Nero (BMC' p. 226 no. 142). (b) Sestertius of Nero (BMC' p. 218 no. 122 plate 41.5) Fig. 8 Inscription to Gavius Silvanus, ILS 2701 (Archaeological Museum, Turin). (PhotographCourtesy of Prof. M. Crawford). Fig. 9 'Military Class' silver denarius of Vitellius (Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge). SUMMARY The purpose of this thesis is to investigate the role of the Praetorian Guard in the hundred years between the battle of Actium and the accession of Vespasian. This necessitates not only a consideration of those political activities which the Praetorians undertook at the behest of their emperors but also an examination into-the motivations of the guardsmen themselves. Moreover, any study of, the Praetorian Guard would be less than complete without an account of the development of the Praetorian prefecture. The historical narrative of the Julio-Claudian years reveals four areas of Praetorian prominence. The first, and most important, concerns the way in which Augustus and his successors deployed their Guard. As a military force the contribution of the Praetorians was, during this time, limited to occasional forays onto the battlefield when accompanying the emperor, such as Claudius during the invasion of Britain, or a member of the imperial family, like Germanicus when he was campaigning in Germany. Augustus, however, did not retain his Praetorian cohorts as a military elite, but rather as internal security troops to guarantee the new system of government. Their numbers were large enough - 9 cohorts of 500 men - to deter conspirators. In this preventive role they played a vital part at times of succession. Their presence at Augustus' funeral speaks as much of intimidation as of ceremonial obligation. But the Praetorians were not just a passive deterrent. They acted ruthlessly against the emperor's enemies. Within the imperial family alone we know of Praetorian involvement in the deaths of Agrippa Postumus, Nero Caesar, Drusus Caesar, Agrippina the elder, Tiberius Gemellus, Britannicus and Octavia. Praetorian detachments were responsible for the executions of, among others, Avillius Flaccus, the former prefect of Egypt, during Gaius' principate, and Rubellius Plautus who had incurred Nero's enmity. It would, however, be quite wrong to view the Praetorians as solely an oppressive force like the Gestapo or KGB. The historian's skill and the cruelty of, for example, Octavia's death too often beguile us. We should not ignore Praetorian brutality / brutality, but such activities were but a small part of the Guard's duty. They also kept peace in Rome's turbulent theatres and were occasionally, when need dictated, sent to other towns in Italy. But, above all, we must never forget how effective they were in protecting the regime. The crushing of the conspiracies of Messalina in AD. 48 and Piso in AD. 65 should be attributed, in large measure, to the loyalty of the Praetorians. The second area of Praetorian activity which we should note is when they intervened in the political process with a more obvious self- interest as at the assassination of Gaius in AD. 41. The prospect of a restoration of the Republic held little attraction for the Praetorian Guard. And so Claudius was found and taken to the security of the Praetorian barracks, where he promised each Praetorian the huge donative of 15,000 sesterces -a ruinous precedent. The impotent Senate huffed and puffed - and then surrendered. The manner of Claudius' accession was of immense significance. From that time Praetorian endorsement became, for a new princeps, an unavoidable constraint. In AD. 68 the Praetorians realised that, if they could make emperors, they could also unmake them. Their support for Galba at that time indicates both Nero's unpopularity and the effectiveness of Nymphidius' false promises. Again, their replacement of Galba by Otho was motivated, above all, by the old emperor's refusal to pay the donative promised in his name. In all of this we may detect a determination among the Praetorians to maintain their privileges and advantageous terms of service. We should, however, be wary of viewing the Guard as a politically homogeneous force. There were clear differences in outlook between, on the one hand, the tribunes and the centurions and, on the other, the enlisted men. Hence the participation of some Praetorian officers in the conspiracies of AD. 41 and AD. 65. Even among the guardsmen themselves we find very different social and geographical backgrounds. The political, even politicised voice with which the Praetorians spoke in AD. 69 can easily mislead us. Selfishness and the preservation of their status were the dominant factors behind Praetorian loyalty. Some / Some commentators have turned the focus of attention on a third, distinctly unattractive aspect of the Praetorians' conduct - their alleged indiscipline. It is clear that for much of AD. 69 the Praetorians were a law unto themselves. In March of that year Otho's guardsmen went on a drunken rampage which culminated with an invasion of the imperial palace. They also mounted surveillance on those senators whom they suspected of being Vitellian sympathizers. Their behaviour on campaign was characterized by the same chronic disorderliness. Vitellius' Praetorians, recruited in large part from the German legions, were no better. They must bear the responsibility, by their refusal to allow Vitellius to abdicate, for the death and destruction during the Flavian assault on Rome. Elsewhere, however, evidence of Praetorian indiscipline is difficult to find. We should perhaps regard such aberrant conduct as the inevitable concomitant of their occasional interventions in the political process. This is not to excuse anarchy, but a hundred years of fidelity to a succession of emperors should not be defamed because of a few isolated incidents. Finally let us consider the Praetorian prefecture established, perhaps reluctantly, by Augustus in 2BC. Too often the developing importance of the post is ignored as we are mesmerized by the accomplishments of prefects like Seianus and Burrus. It is undoubtedly true that such men enhanced the status of the prefecture by their tenure, but the office was, from the beginning, a post of great potentiality.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Legionary Philip Matyszak
    LEGIONARY PHILIP MATYSZAK LEGIONARY The Roman Soldier’s (Unofficial) Manual With 92 illustrations To John Radford, Gunther Maser and the others from 5 Group, Mrewa. Contents Philip Matyszak has a doctorate in Roman history from St John’s College, I Joining the Roman Army 6 Oxford, and is the author of Chronicle of the Roman Republic, The Enemies of Rome, The Sons of Caesar, Ancient Rome on Five Denarii a Day and Ancient Athens on Five Drachmas a Day. He teaches an e-learning course in Ancient II The Prospective Recruit’s History for the Institute of Continuing Education at Cambridge University. Good Legion Guide 16 III Alternative Military Careers 33 HALF-TITLE Legionary’s dagger and sheath. Daggers are used for repairing tent cords, sorting out boot hobnails and general legionary maintenance, and consequently see much more use than a sword. IV Legionary Kit and Equipment 52 TITLE PAGE Trajan addresses troops after battle. A Roman general tries to be near the front lines in a fight so that he can personally comment afterwards on feats of heroism (or shirking). V Training, Discipline and Ranks 78 VI People Who Will Want to Kill You 94 First published in the United Kingdom in 2009 by Thames & Hudson Ltd, 181a High Holborn, London wc1v 7qx VII Life in Camp 115 First paperback edition published in 2018 Legionary © 2009 and 2018 Thames & Hudson Ltd, London VIII On Campaign 128 All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording IX How to Storm a City 149 or any other information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Criminal Trials in the Julio-Claudian Era
    Women in Criminal Trials in the Julio-Claudian Era by Tracy Lynn Deline B.A., University of Saskatchewan, 1994 M.A., University of Saskatchewan, 2001 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Classics) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) September 2009 © Tracy Lynn Deline, 2009 Abstract This study focuses on the intersection of three general areas: elite Roman women, criminal law, and Julio-Claudian politics. Chapter one provides background material on the literary and legal source material used in this study and considers the cases of Augustus’ daughter and granddaughter as a backdrop to the legal and political thinking that follows. The remainder of the dissertation is divided according to women’s roles in criminal trials. Chapter two, encompassing the largest body of evidence, addresses the role of women as defendants, and this chapter is split into three thematic parts that concentrate on charges of adultery, treason, and other crimes. A recurring question is whether the defendants were indicted for reasons specific to them or the indictments were meant to injure their male family members politically. Analysis of these cases reveals that most of the accused women suffered harm without the damage being shared by their male family members. Chapter three considers that a handful of powerful women also filled the role of prosecutor, a role technically denied to them under the law. Resourceful and powerful imperial women like Messalina and Agrippina found ways to use criminal accusations to remove political enemies. Chapter four investigates women in the role of witnesses in criminal trials.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebellious Legions and Senatorial Delegations: Tacitus’ Histories 1.19 and 1.74
    Rebellious Legions and Senatorial Delegations: Tacitus’ Histories 1.19 and 1.74 Reports of the revolt of the Fourth and Twenty-Second Legions in Upper Germany during the first days of 69 prompted the Roman Senate to vote to send out a delegation. Tacitus discusses the make-up of this delegation in Histories 1.19.2. Members of the senate obviously were to participate, but there was also discussion secreto (Heubner 57; Sage ANRW II.33.2 899) as to whether Piso, newly adopted by Galba, should go “in order to add the prestige of a Caesar to the senate’s authority” (illi auctoritatem senatus, hic dignationem Caesaris laturus). The senate further resolved (placebat) to send Laco, the praetorian prefect, with the legati. Laco, however, refused (is consilio intercessit). At the end of Tacitus’ account we learn that the senate left the selection of the actual members of the delegation to Galba. The emperor consequently exposed the political nature of the delegation and the power struggles among the Romans by incompetently naming and then revising his list of envoys as they either begged to go or to stay in Rome, ut quemque metus uel spes impulerat. Otho recalled this delegation (1.74.2) after Galba’s murder and his own accession to power, only to send out another specie senatus (cf. Talbert 1984, 410), after adding praetorian guards per simulationem officii. In addition to being sent to the two legions in Upper Germany, Otho sent the delegation to the Italic Legion and an urban cohort stationed in Lugdunum. According to Tacitus, the praetorians were sent back without being granted the opportunity to “mix” (Damon 164) with the legions, although the senatorial envoys got to Vitellius and stayed with him longer than was justifiable (Chilver 137).
    [Show full text]
  • Galba 5 B.C.? - 69 A.D
    75 AD GALBA 5 B.C.? - 69 A.D. Plutarch translated by John Dryden Plutarch (46-120) - Greek biographer, historian, and philosopher, sometimes known as the encyclopaedist of antiquity. He is most renowned for his series of character studies, arranged mostly in pairs, known as “Plutarch’s Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans” or “Parallel Lives.” Galba (75 AD) - A study of the life of the Roman Emperor, Galba. GALBA IPHICRATES the Athenian used to say that it is best to have a mercenary soldier fond of money and of pleasures, for thus he will fight the more boldly, to procure the means to gratify his desires. But most have been of opinion, that the body of an army, as well as the natural one, when in its healthy condition, should make no efforts apart, but in compliance with its head. Wherefore they tell us that Paulus Aemilius, on taking command of the forces in Macedonia, and finding them talkative and impertinently busy, as though they were all commanders, issued out his orders that they should have only ready hands and keen swords, and leave the rest to him. And Plato, who can discern use of a good ruler or general if his men are not on their part obedient and conformable (the virtue of obeying, as of ruling, being, in his opinion, one that does not exist without first a noble nature, and then a philosophic education, where the eager and active powers are allayed with the gentler and humaner sentiments), may claim in confirmation of his doctrine sundry mournful instances elsewhere, and, in particular, the events that followed among the Romans upon the death of Nero, in which plain proofs were given that nothing is more terrible than a military force moving about in an empire upon uninstructed and unreasoning impulses.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Thrasyllus in Tacitus
    ) ) 10 THRASYLLUS IN TACITUS (ANN. 6.21 ) REVILO P. OLIVER We can only conjecture how many of the decisions and acts of Tiberius during his long principate were influenced or even determined by Thrasyllus, the one adviser in whom he appears to have had implicit and even unlimited confidence. The origin of this extraordinary friendship has been satis- factorily and, I am sure, correctly explained by Frederick H. Cramer. 1 When Tiberius, resenting the indignities put upon him by the man who was his stepfather and father-in-law, retired to Rhodes, Thrasyllus, an Alexandrian, perhaps of Greek an- cestry, was one of the most eminent of the competing profes- sors in that intellectual capital. According to Cramer, he "must be considered not only one of the most versatile, but also one of the most profound scholars of his era." We may doubt the profundity, which is not necessarily the same as subtlety, but we cannot question the versatility or the learning attested by Cramer's catalogue of his accomplish- ments, to which I add only the suggestion that the opinions and teaching of Thrasyllus may have changed in the course of a career of which the stages are summarized, I think, by a scholium on Juvenal: multarum artium scientiam professus postremo 2 se dedit Platonicae sectae ac deinde mathesi. A grammaticus with SO 1) Astrology in Roman Law and Politics (Philadelphia 1954), p. 94. For plausible conjectures concerning Thrasyllus' s possibly enormous in- fluence on historical events, see pp. 99-108. 2) Ad luv. 6.576. The scholiast is commonly disregarded because his concise note ends with a statement that when Thrasyllus thought himself in danger from Tiberius, dolum cum praesensit, fugit, which is taken to mean that he fled from Rhodes, whereas it is almost certain that he , Revilo P.
    [Show full text]
  • Pliny's "Vesuvius" Narratives (Epistles 6.16, 6.20)
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Letters from an advocate: Pliny's "Vesuvius" narratives (Epistles 6.16, 6.20) Citation for published version: Berry, D 2008, Letters from an advocate: Pliny's "Vesuvius" narratives (Epistles 6.16, 6.20). in F Cairns (ed.), Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar . vol. 13, Francis Cairns Publications Ltd, pp. 297-313. Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Early version, also known as pre-print Published In: Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar Publisher Rights Statement: ©Berry, D. (2008). Letters from an advocate: Pliny's "Vesuvius" narratives (Epistles 6.16, 6.20). In F. Cairns (Ed.), Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar . (pp. 297-313). Francis Cairns Publications Ltd. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 29. Sep. 2021 LETTERS FROM AN ADVOCATE: Pliny’s ‘Vesuvius’ Narratives (Epp. 6.16, 6.20)* D.H. BERRY University of Edinburgh To us in the modern era, the most memorable letters of Pliny the Younger are Epp. 6.16 and 6.20, addressed to Cornelius Tacitus.
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 74-10,982
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. White the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Betrayals 6 X 1 Hour
    Ancient Betrayals 6 x 1 Hour MAIN CONCEPT We aim to bring to life the full and until now, little-known story of the conspiracies, murders, and acts of treason behind some of the greatest betrayals in ancient history. The traitors who lived in a shadowy underworld of politics, intrigue and revenge, trusting no-one as they watched their backs to survive. One person's treachery was another's smart political move.There are many types of betrayals not always a knife in the back or the rope around the throat, but also political and personal betrayal which can be worse than torture. In this series we will look into some major pivotal acts of betrayal and with the help of ancient history experts, dig into their background, unravel the sequence of events with such dire consequences and understand their impact on history. FORMAT 6 x 48 minutes documentary series from the creators of The Secrets of the Knights Templar, Warrior's Way, Footprints of Civilization and Empire Games. Each episode will be dedicated to one act of betrayal from Ancient history, rarely documented on television. We uncover the real stories and motivations behind the acts of betrayals. The series can easily be scalable and many more betrayals can be examined in future gripping seasons. In each episode and with help of experts, state of the art CGI and high quality recreations, we will look at the roots of the betrayals, how they happened and changed history. Ancient Betrayals 6 x 1 Hour KEY ELEMENTS . A fresh look at some of the notorious traitors and betrayals of the ancient world .
    [Show full text]
  • Read Book Romes Executioner Pdf Free Download
    ROMES EXECUTIONER PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Robert Fabbri | 384 pages | 01 May 2014 | ATLANTIC BOOKS | 9781848879140 | English | London, United Kingdom Romes Executioner PDF Book We are already horny for more DLC and it hasn't even been a full month since the Twisted and the Twilight. He worked his blade harder and faster as he contemplated the futility of the situation. Before this, capital punishment was meted by the judges themselves, or the prosecutors or relatives of the condemned, or other persons as suited. Categories :. Fascinating details, CM, about some of the bloodthirsty habits of ancient Romans. If you opposed them, it sounds like you also opposed living. For most poor souls who were crucified, nobody cared enough or their relatives were not wealthy or influential enough to get them a decent burial. There is an amazing variety of different religious beliefs and customs on this planet of ours and people are entitled to believe what they want to with no fear of persecution. Hi Wesman, big thanks for dropping in. A monkey was seen as a lesser, inferior version of a human being and cockerels were thought to have no family feelings at all. All content related issues will be solved right here. Magnus sat on a horse, twenty paces away, grinning as he levelled his hunting bow at him. Computer Science. Vespasian started and spun round, cutting his thumb on the knife in the process. The animal reared up, whinnying piercingly, knocking Vespasian to the ground; another shaft slammed into its shoulder quickly followed by one into its exposed chest, felling it.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ROMAN EMPEROR CALIGULA (Reign 37 - 41 A.D) Caligula Was Not Quite 25 Years Old When He Took Power in 37 A.D
    Emperors of Rome -- The Bad Side of Monarchy THE ROMAN EMPEROR CALIGULA (Reign 37 - 41 A.D) Caligula was not quite 25 years old when he took power in 37 A.D. At first, his succession was welcomed in Rome: He announced political reforms and recalled all exiles. But in October of 37, a serious illness unhinged Caligula, leading him to spend the remainder of his reign exploring the worst aspects of his nature. For much of human history, emperors and kings called themselves gods and ruled by what eventually came to be called ‘Divine Right.’ Divine means relating to heaven, god, or gods, depending on the culture and the religious beliefs of that culture. By claiming to either be a god or to be god like, kings throughout history increased their power, making it seem that if anyone questioned their power, they were questioning god(s). Roman emperor Caligula lavished money on building projects, from the practical (aqueducts and harbors) to the cultural (theaters and temples) to the downright bizarre (requisitioning hundreds of Roman merchant ships to construct a 2-mile floating bridge across the Bay of Bauli so he could spend two days galloping back and forth across it). In 39 and 40 A.D he led military campaigns to the Rhine and the English Channel, where he ordered battles for theatrical displays, commanding his troops to “plunder the sea” by gathering shells in their helmets). His relationships with other individuals were turbulent as well. His biographer Suetonius quotes his often repeated phrase, “Remember that I have the right to do anything to anybody.” He tormented high-ranking senators by making them run for miles in front of his chariot.
    [Show full text]
  • Siegfried Found: Decoding the Nibelungen Period
    1 Gunnar Heinsohn (Gdańsk, February 2018) SIEGFRIED FOUND: DECODING THE NIBELUNGEN PERIOD CONTENTS I Was Emperor VICTORINUS the historical model for SIEGFRIED of the Nibelungen Saga? 2 II Siegfried the Dragon Slayer and the Dragon Legion of Victorinus 12 III Time of the Nibelungen. How many migration periods occurred in the 1st millennium? Who was Clovis, first King of France? 20 IV Results 34 V Bibliography 40 Acknowledgements 41 VICTORINUS (coin portrait) 2 I Was Emperor VICTORINUS the historical model for SIEGFRIED of the Nibelungen Saga? The mythical figure of Siegfried from Xanten (Colonia Ulpia Traiana), the greatest hero of the Germanic and Nordic sagas, is based on the real Gallic emperor Victorinus (meaning “the victorious”), whose name can be translated into Siegfried (Sigurd etc.), which means “victorious” in German and the Scandinavian languages. The reign of Victorinus is conventionally dated 269-271 AD. He is one of the leaders of the so-called Gallic Empire (Imperium Galliarum; 260-274 AD), mostly known from Historia Augusta (Thayer 2018), Epitome de Caesaribus of Aurelius Victor (Banchich 2009), and the Breviarum of Eutropius (Watson 1886). The capital city of this empire was Cologne, 80 km south of Xanten. Trier and Lyon were additional administrative centers. This sub-kingdom tried to defend the western part of the Roman Empire against invaders who were taking advantage of the so-called Crisis of the Third Century, which mysteriously lasted exactly 50 years (234 to 284 AD). Yet, the Gallic Empire also had separatist tendencies and sought to become independent from Rome. The bold claim of Victorinus = Siegfried was put forward, in 1841, by A.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]