A Study in Epicurean Poetics: Virgil's Eclogues by David Douglas B. A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
A Study in Epicurean Poetics: Virgil’s Eclogues by David Douglas B. A., McGill University, 2017 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Greek and Roman Studies © David Douglas, 2020 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii A Study in Epicurean Poetics: Virgil’s Eclogues by David Douglas B. A., McGill University, 2017 Supervisory Committee Dr. Cedric Littlewood, Supervisor Department of Greek and Roman Studies Dr. Clifford Roberts, Committee Member Department of Philosophy iii Abstract In this thesis I propose a reading of Virgil’s Eclogues which draws heavily on the author’s background in Epicurean philosophy. My aims are twofold: firstly to illuminate the literary complexities of Virgil’s bucolic poetry, a poetry which is highly allusive and whose meaning rests on knowledge of a wide range of both literary and philosophical sources; and secondly to substantiate a more general theory of Epicurean poetics by observing how such a theory can be seen to unfold in Virgil’s poetic practice. Beginning with the available biographical sources on Virgil’s life, I review the evidence for his adherence to Epicureanism and attempt to provide a rough chronology of his philosophical conversion and early literary output, including the Eclogues. In addition to this historical context I give an overview of Epicurean ethical teachings as they relate to poetry and literature, in order to arrive at a better understanding of the discursive and ideological milieu which would have informed the Eclogues’ composition. The remainder of the thesis traces the interaction between Virgil’s literary and philosophical inheritances across the textual fabric of the Eclogues. I isolate the shared concerns of Epicurean philosophy and bucolic poetics to regulate their engagement with the ancient poetic genres of epic and elegy, compositional modes which are associated with frustration and moral danger. Finally I show how in the Eclogues Virgil engages with a third poetic genre, (cosmological) didactic, and how this engagement reflects both an Epicurean interest in the ethical benefits of natural philosophy (physiologia) and a tendentious literary program which seeks to innovate on the generic conception of bucolic poetry that Virgil takes over from his bucolic predecessor, Theocritus. iv Table of Contents Supervisory Committee ………………………………………………………………………... ii Abstract ………………………………………………………………………………………... iii Table of Contents ……………………………………………………………………………… iv Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………………….…… v Note on Translations …………………………………………………………………….…….. vi Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………. 1 Chapter 1 ………………………………………………………………………………………. 8 i. Vergilius Minor ……………………………………………………………………… 8 ii. The Culex and the Ciris ……………………………………………………………. 17 iii. Virgil and Pollio …………………………………………………………………… 29 Chapter 2 ……………………………………………………………………………………… 38 i. Epicurean Poetics …………………………………………………………………… 38 ii. Epicurean Poetry …………………………………………………………………… 48 iii. Poiêma and Poiêsis ………………………………………………………………... 59 Chapter 3 ……………………………………………………………………………………… 67 i. Virgil, Epicureanism, and Bucolic Genre …………………………………………… 67 ii. Theocritean Bucolic ………………………………………………………………... 72 iii. Virgilian Bucolic I: the Eclogues and Epic ………………………………………... 86 iv. Virgilian Bucolic II: the Eclogues and Elegy…………………………………….... 100 Chapter 4 ……………………………………………………………………………………... 114 i. Virgil, Lucretius, and Physiologia ………………………………………………….. 114 ii. Virgilian Bucolic III: the Eclogues and Didactic ………………………………….. 121 iii. Daphnis Physiologos …………………………………………………………….... 135 iv. The Song of Silenus ……………………………………………………………….. 145 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………………. 155 Bibliography ………………………………………………………………………………….. 158 v Acknowledgements I would like to begin by acknowledging the Lekwungen-speaking peoples, the Songhees, Esquimalt, and W̱SÁNEĆ nations, on whose unceded, traditional territory I have lived and worked during my research for this thesis. I would secondly like to thank my supervisory committee, Cedric Littlewood and Cliff Roberts, for their patient and acute oversight throughout the past year. Hélène Cazes, Greg Rowe, Michael Chase, and Doug Hutchinson, directly and indirectly, all offered useful suggestions and commentary at various points throughout the project. I am also very grateful to the generosity of Philip Hardie, who kindly read and provided detailed feedback on the drafts of two chapters. Further recognition is due to my family, friends, and fellow students in Victoria and elsewhere whose continual support has greatly eased the laborious experience of bringing this thesis to completion. Nor would the process of my research have been what it was if not for the reliable help and general affability of the staff at the McPherson Library. I would especially like to recognize the assistance I received from Carol Gordon in procuring several items not held in the University’s collection. Last but very far from least, I am indebted to the seemingly inexhaustible patience, tolerance, and goodwill of Carolyn, Jacqueline, and Dave in the McPherson Library’s Inter-Library Loans Office. Sine quibus non. vi Note on Translations All translations are my own unless otherwise noted. Where I have quoted a separate translation, I have usually referred to the English versions available in the standard editions of the Loeb Classical Library. The three exceptions are, in no particular order, Anthony Verity’s (2002) translation of Theocritus, which I have consulted for some passages of Idylls 1 and 7, Annette Harder’s (2012) translation of Callimachus’ Aetia (fr. 1), and Cyril Bailey’s (1947) translation of Lucretius. 1 INTRODUCTION What follows is an attempt to arrive at a better understanding of Virgil’s Eclogues, as poetry, from the point of view of Epicurean philosophy. The division between poetry and philosophy that is today entrenched in many institutional and practical contexts is of course mostly an artificial one; if this dichotomy is often reflected in the way people actually go about doing poetry or philosophy, this is in large part due to the assumptions that the poet or the philosopher bring to their respective occupations in our modern world. For the ancient Greeks and Romans the distinction was by no means so determinant, nor so tidy. It was a commonplace in antiquity for writers to reflect on philosophy’s poetic origins in the legendary works of early figures such as Orpheus, Musaeus, and Linus.1 This strain of philosophy-cum-poetry was continued by important Presocratic thinkers, such as Empedocles and Parmenides. In Virgil’s day it acquired a distinguished representative in the didactic poetry of Titus Lucretius Carus – or simply Lucretius – whose magnum opus, the De rerum natura, comprised a far-reaching survey of the philosophical ‘discoveries’ of Epicurus of Samos, a pre-eminent thinker of the Hellenistic period and the founder of the Epicurean school. Next to the achievements of these major poet- philosophers, even apparently unphilosophical works like the Homeric poems became subject to searching philosophical analysis, as scholars tried hard to harmonize their contents with this or that philosophical system. The result was that, during the Hellenistic period, literature became irreversibly imbricated with nascent critical theories spanning the fields of aesthetics, linguistics, 1 See for instance Diog. Laert. 1.3. 2 ethics, and natural philosophy. In turn this affected the practice of poets, who found themselves unable to compose without reference to or engagement in these broader currents of discourse.2 And this is as true for Virgil as it was for his Hellenistic predecessors – Theocritus, Callimachus, Aratus, and Apollonius, to name but a few. We know from a variety of different sources that as a young adult Virgil espoused Epicureanism, and it therefore seems worthwhile to explore the ramifications of this early philosophical conversion for his early poetic output. One of Virgil’s documented associates, the Epicurean philosopher Philodemus of Gadara, is notable for writing extensively on the topic of literary theory and criticism, in what amounted to a large- scale and concerted effort to outline the dimensions of an orthodox Epicurean stance towards poetic creation. Such theoretical work, in some form or other, would almost certainly have been known to Virgil. The present thesis will be an exploration of the consequences of this type of familiarity for the structure and meaning of the Eclogues. Moreover, it is hoped that by presenting a coherent Epicureanizing interpretation of the Eclogues a measure of solidity may be added to our understanding of Epicurean poetics, independent of the textual embodiment of any such poetics in Virgil’s bucolic poetry. As we move forward, a central concept for our study of the Eclogues will be that of literary genre. Modern literary theory has emphasized the role which formal constructs such as genre play in defining the ‘literarity’ of literature – the aspects of poetic and literary texts which signal their participation in larger structural and formal patterns.3 Without this type of structural referentiality it would be difficult to say what makes a literary text ‘literary’, what makes a novel a ‘novel’, or what makes a poem a ‘poem’ as opposed to, say, a grocery-list. In such an 2 For a more detailed