DOCSLIB.ORG

Independent Country Programme Evaluation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Independent Country Programme Evaluation INDEPENDENT COUNTRY PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF UNDP CONTRIBUTION: INDONESIA ANNEXES United Nations Development Programme Independent Evaluation Office Contents Annex 1. Progress towards outcomes and outputs in results and resources framework ........................... 3 Annex 2. Indonesia ICPE Terms of Reference ............................................................................................. 35 Annex 3. List of people consulted .............................................................................................................. 44 Annex 1. Progress towards outcomes and outputs in results and resources framework Outcome 1. BY 2020, MORE VULNERABLE, LOW-INCOME AND FOOD-INSECURE PEOPLE HAVE AN ADEQUATE STANDARD OF LIVING AND EQUITABLE ACCESS TO DECENT WORK, SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INCOME-EARNING OPPORTUNITIES. Outcome indicators Indicator-1.1: Papua Province poverty rate Outcome resources Estimated in CPD: $6.1 [$1.1 (regular), $5.0 (other)] Indicator-1.2: West Papua Province Poverty Rate ($m) Indicator-1.3: Papua Province Gini Index Expenditure to date: $1.5 [$0.7 (regular), $0.8 (other)] Indicator-1.4: West Papua Province Gini Index Level of influence on Marginal, cannot attribute. Estimated outcome: Significant shortfall on estimate outcome indicators CPD Output CPD Output IEO Assessment IEO Progress Other significant Key Focus and impact on gender Key interventions including Expenditure Indicators of UNDP rating contributions challenges/risks equality estimated value and 2016–19 ($m) influence on implementation period. output indicators Output 1.1: Local # of people with Insufficient Off track UNDP plays a Heavy reliance on GEN0: 0% - Tanah Papua Platform $1.5 governments and improved incomes evidence/low level strategic, important core funding for GEN1: 0% (TPP), 2015-2018, [$0.6; communities have enhanced through sustainable of influence. Cannot assess and valued role as programming, GEN2: 61% $0.2 (Regular) $0.4 (Other)] $0.7 (regular), capacity to design and productive activities, UNDP Chair of the Papua combined with GEN3: 39% - PIP - Support Papua and $0.8 (other) West Papua through LED, implement sustainable disaggregated by sex performance Platform, which sits declining donor 2016-2019, [$0.46; livelihood programmes and small against agreed under the Papua Desk support. Justification for Gender $0.45(Regular) $0.01(Other)] (Papua and West Papua). landholders. output. in the National marker ratings. - PIP- Papua Platform for Planning Agency CO should revise # local governments Acceleration of Sustainable (BAPPENAS), and is output description - Appears exaggerated. Not Development, 2018-2019, in targeted regions expected to facilitate and indicators so justified by available [$0.44; $0 (Regular) that have established coordination and they better capture performance reports. $0.44(Other)] local economic communication among value created by development development actors UNDP’s work in Evidence of gender equality agencies or and programmes in Papua and West outcomes. programmes to foster Papua and West Papua Provinces. growth, increase Papua. UNDP - Modest: Supported launch of a access to credit and local government gender-based provides technical support violence prevention programme assistance to the farmers/small in Papua, but level of attribution Papua Desk in entrepreneurs. to project is not clearly BAPPENAs and to the established. Indonesia Regional Development Planning Agency (BAPPEDA) and to the province of West Papua. Supporting evidence - Indonesian Government and donors provided positive feedback on UNDP support. - Performance reports outline a range of activities that are relevant to the needs of Papua and West Papua. - The CO initially had a local economic development (LED) initiative pipeline in Papua to be funded by the provincial/district government financing agreement, which did not materialise due to restrictions in government rules and regulation on subnational government financing to international organizations. Self-assessed performance Not available data Adequacy of supporting - Not adequate. evidence - Limited supporting evidence provided. Three project documents covering work in this area do not provide a clear framework for UNDP programming or strategy in Papua, and only one performance report has been provided. - No evaluations were available covering work under this output. Outcome 2. BY 2020, THE POOR AND MOST VULNERABLE HAVE BETTER AND MORE EQUITABLE ACCESS TO QUALITY BASIC SOCIAL SERVICES, INCLUDING HEALTH AND EDUCATION, AND TO COMPREHENSIVE SOCIAL PROTECTION AND BETTER ACCESS TO WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION. Outcome indicators Indicator-2.1: Human Development Index, Outcome resources Estimated in CPD: $2.7 [1.4$ (regular), 1.3$ (other)] Indicator-2.2: Gender Development Index ($m) Indicator-2.3: National poverty rate Expenditure to date: $11.2 [$0.8 (regular), $10.4 (other) Indicator-2.4: % of the population registered in the Social Health Insurance scheme, disaggregated by sex Estimated outcome: Significant excess on estimate. Indicator-2.5: Percentage of provincial governments that have scored B (= good, 65%-75%) or above in the Government Institution Performance Accountability Report ('LAKIP') Level of influence on Marginal, cannot attribute. outcome indicators OUTPUT OUTPUT LEVEL OF IEO Progress Other significant Key challenges/ Focus and impact on gender Key interventions, including Expenditure INDICATORS INFLUENCE ON rating contributions risks equality estimated value and 2016–19 ($m) STATED OUTPUT implementation period. INDICATORS Output 2.1. Subnational Output Indicators: Insufficient Off track Successfully promoted- Frameworks for GEN0: 1% - PIP - SDGs Localization $3.2 authorities have improved evidence/low level recognition of the implementation of GEN1: 43% Programme in Indonesia, % of subnational financing, of influence Cannot assess importance of the projects supporting GEN2: 56% 2018-2019, [$0.8; $0.6 (regular), budget in targeted implementation/monitoring of UNDP SDGs as a universal achievement of this GEN3: 0% $0(Regular) $0.8(Other)] $2.6 (other) regions allocated for output are short - PIP - Tech. Assistance Millennium Development performance objective, and one basic health and term and future SDGs Implementation in Goals/sustainable against agreed through which policy Justification for Gender education services. funding is Indonesia, 2017-2019, development goal output. development and marker ratings. Baseline(2014): 4% uncertain. [$0.75; $0.15(Regular) $0.6 acceleration programmes debate in Indonesia Target: 30% - Funding capacity (Other)] and delivery of basic can be usefully does not match - Mixed evidence, but from services framed. available designs and project Percentage of Supported local stated CPD reporting, attribution of - RBAP Pipeline Development sustainable planning in three aspirations. expenditure exaggerates Fund, 2016-2019, [$0.6; development goal provinces, with micro - Challenge to gender focus of the output. $0.4 (Regular) $0.2 (Other)] action plans and projects at the district assess extent to - Achieving 2030 Agenda for which support is Sustainable Development in goal-related level focused on waste Evidence of gender equality resulting in more AP, 2018-2021, [$0.6; $0 acceleration management and outcomes. effective policies or (Regular) $0.6 (Other)] frameworks that are agriculture. programmes. - PIP - SDG Support - 2018: None reported at least 70% funded - Scalability of micro- Programme, 2016-2019, - 2017: Women’s representation Baseline(2014): 0% projects is not clear, [$0.4; $0 (Regular) $0.4 in SDG secretariat structure in and documentation (Other)] Target: 80% one province cited as only of results is achievement. probably not of - 2016: Cites SDGs inclusion sufficient quality to principle applied by SDG support scaling up. national secretariat as sole - CO should revise result. output description and indicators so they better capture value created by UNDP’s work on SDG mainstreaming. Supporting evidence - Support for the SDG’s secretariat in Bappenas towards: o Development and launching of National Action Plan o Development of Indonesia SDG Roadmap towards 2030 o Development of SDG Monitoring and Evaluation Framework targeting Non-state Actors, and o Development of SDG Communication Strategy. o Delivery of second Voluntary National Review at the July 2019 High Level Political Forum. - Support for local planning in three provinces, including implementation of micro projects at the district level focused on waste management and agriculture. - Exploration of potential to encourage innovative financing instruments to underpin SDG achievement o Establishment of a small grant funded partnership with BAZNAS (the national zakat board of Indonesia) to harness zakat, and Bank Jambi to implement a micro hydro power plant benefitting over 5,000 people from 800 families in four poor villages. o Support through secretariat to implementation of SDG at sub national level and directly with one province through funding from the Tanoto foundation. o Micro project, jointly with ILO and UNESCO to explore potential to mobilise innovative financing for SDGs, specifically to promote equal access to quality education and skills development. Self-assessed performance None available data Adequacy of supporting - Not adequate. evidence - Limited project progress reporting available. The number of frameworks and agreements through which support has been provided makes it difficult to understand UNDP’s long-term strategy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Daftar 34 Provinsi Beserta Ibukota Di Indonesia
    SEKRETARIAT UTAMA LEMHANNAS RI BIRO KERJASAMA DAFTAR 34 PROVINSI BESERTA IBUKOTA DI INDONESIA I. PULAU SUMATERA 1. Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam : Banda Aceh 2. Sumatera Utara : Medan 3. Sumatera Selatan : Palembang 4. Sumatera Barat : Padang 5. Bengkulu : Bengkulu 6. Riau : Pekanbaru 7. Kepulauan Riau : Tanjung Pinang 8. Jambi : Jambi 9. Lampung : Bandar Lampung 10. Bangka Belitung : Pangkal Pinang II. PULAU KALIMANTAN 1. Kalimantan Barat : Pontianak 2. Kalimantan Timur : Samarinda 3. Kalimantan Selatan : Banjarmasin 4. Kalimantan Tengah : Palangkaraya 5. Kalimantan Utara : Tanjung Selor (Belum pernah melkskan MoU) III. PULAU JAWA 1. Banten : Serang 2. DKI Jakarta : Jakarta 3. Jawa Barat : Bandung 4. Jawa Tengah : Semarang 5. DI Yogyakarta : Yogyakarta 6. Jawa timur : Surabaya IV. PULAU NUSA TENGGARA & BALI 1. Bali : Denpasar 2. Nusa Tenggara Timur : Kupang 3. Nusa Tenggara Barat : Mataram V. PULAU SULAWESI 1. Gorontalo : Gorontalo 2. Sulawesi Barat : Mamuju 3. Sulawesi Tengah : Palu 4. Sulawesi Utara : Manado 5. Sulawesi Tenggara : Kendari 6. Sulawesi Selatan : Makassar VI. PULAU MALUKU & PAPUA 1. Maluku Utara : Ternate 2. Maluku : Ambon 3. Papua Barat : Manokwari 4. Papua ( Daerah Khusus ) : Jayapura *) Provinsi Terbaru Prov. Teluk Cendrawasih (Seruai) *) Provinsi Papua Barat (Sorong) 2 DAFTAR MoU DI LEMHANNAS RI Pemerintah/Non Pemerintah, BUMN/Swasta, Parpol, Ormas & Universitas *) PROVINSI 1. Gub. Aceh-10/5 16-11-2009 2. Prov. Sumatera Barat-11/5 08-12-2009 Prov. Sumbar-116/12 16-12-2015 3. Prov. Kep Riau-12/5 21-12-2009 Kep. Riau-112/5 16-12-2015 4. Gub. Kep Bangka Belitung-13/5 18-11-2009 5. Gub. Sumatera Selatan-14 /5 16-11-2009 Gub.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relevance of Own-Source Revenue to the Independence of West Sulawesi
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 84 International Conference on Ethics in Governance (ICONEG 2016) The Relevance of Own-Source Revenue to the Independence of West Sulawesi Muhlis Madani Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar Makassar, Indonesia [email protected] Abstract— This study aims to outline the relevance of west- Sulawesi in order to create local independence and prosperity sulawesi’s OSR with local independence as the carrying capacity achieved. in accelerating the development execution in West-Sulawesi. The Since regional autonomy had been launched in 2001 to approach used is mix between fiscal decentralization approaches, present the financial inequality between the center and regions degree of fiscal needs and fiscal capacity. It’ll conclude a more as between regions, the area is still very visible, especially in comprehensive and representative, data used is secondary data derived from Regional Budget Fiscal in 2013/2014, survey of the province which was divided after the reform like literature and studies done previously to strengthen study Gorontalo, West Sulawesi, West Papua, and North Maluku. analysis. It showed the independence of West Sulawesi province Comparison between the OSR with a budget sourced from the still very low, seen from fiscal degree decentralization in 2014 center ranges from 30%: 70% with variations contributions only 11.15% in the proportion of OSR aspect to regional revenue OSR, 208 regencies / cities have OSR contribution less than and BHPBP against Total Revenue Region approximately 4.44%, 20%, as many as 65 districts / cities have contributed 20.1 while the degree of fiscal needs in 2014 at OSR proportion to the OSR % -40%, as many as 17 districts / cities that have the regional income approximately 11.15%.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciling Economic Growth with Emissions Reductions
    In cooperation with: Financial Cooperation (KfW) This module focuses on the implementation of REDD+ ‘on the ground’. It aims to demonstrate the viability of a pro-poor REDD mechanism in Kalimantan to decision-makers and stakeholders, is the German Development Bank, thus enriching the national and international debate on REDD+ acting on behalf of the German Government. It with practical implementation experience. KfW uses a district carries out cooperation projects with developing based approach in order to prepare selected pilot areas for national and emerging countries. In Indonesia, KfW’s and international carbon markets. KfW finances measures to long-standing cooperation started in 1962 with achieve readiness in three districts of Kalimantan (Kapuas Hulu, its local office in Jakarta established in 1998. KfW Malinau, Berau), realizes an investment programme for REDD has been actively engaged in the forestry sector demonstration activities and develops an innovative and fair since 2008, as mandated by the Federal Ministry incentive payment scheme. for Economic Cooperation and Development Components of the FORCLIME Financial Cooperation (FC) (BMZ) and the Federal Ministry for the Module: Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMUB). Our forestry portfolio includes • Livelihood: improvement of livelihood and capacity building. REDD+, Biodiversity and Integrated Watershed • Forest ecosystem management: forest ecosystem assesment, Management, Ecosystem Restoration and an support to FSC certification, best practice of concession ASEAN Regional Programme. management, qualified data and information. • Documentation and dissemination of lessons learned. • Carbon management: carbon accounting, remote sensing, GIS, and terestrial inventory, benefit sharing financing / carbon Where we work payment. • Carbon management and land use planning: carbon monitoring at site and district level, support communities to conduct .Tanjung Selor carbon monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • INDONESIA: West Sulawesi Earthquake Flash Update No
    INDONESIA: West Sulawesi Earthquake Flash Update No. 2 As of 16 January 2021 This update is produced by OCHA in collaboration with humanitarian partners. It was issued by Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. The next report will be issued on 18 January 2021, unless the situation changes significantly. SITUATION OVERVIEW TAJIKISTAN TURKMENISTAN A 6.2 magnitude earthquake struck the West Sulawesi Province in Mazari Indonesia on 15 January. The Meteorological, Climatological and Sharif Kholm Geophysics Agency (BMKG) recorded 32 aftershocks with lower Baghlan Herat Jammu Kabul magnitudes in the province until 16 January morning. Chaghcharan Jalalabad and Kashmir Shindand As of 16 January at 2 PM Jakarta time, the Indonesian Agency for Ghazni Gardez Disaster Management (BNPB) has reported 46 people killed and 826 Kandahar people injured by the earthquake in the districts of Mamuju and Zaranj Majene. More than 15,000 people have been temporarily displaced PAKISTAN in 15 evacuation sites within the two districts. These numbers are INDIA likely to increase as search and rescue operations and assessments continue. Heavy damages have been reported by both districts, including the Governor’s office, two hospitals, 25 schools, two hotels, a minimarket, a community health centre, Mamuju Seaport, a bridge, a TNI office and over 300 houses also sustained damages. The initially blocked access road between Majene and Mamuju is passable as of 16 January. Electricity, communications networks and fuel supply have started to become functional. Mamuju Aiport is operational. BNPB identified a number of urgent needs which include blankets, mats, tarpaulin, tents, medical services, medicines and vitamins, masks, PPE, drinking water and ready-to-eat meals, excavators and other heavy equipment, as well as communications equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Geography to Develop Transmigration
    ~; 0IiI'I'lJrY'8AE ••""I$MGI'...J1 IN5TI1\JT FNU«;:AlS œ llB:H6'lOE SCJENTFOJE ""8ItSMG fIOUR LE ~T EH COOPEIW1ON I~~l 1~ FflANCAlSE 1 REGIONAL GEOGRAPHY 10 OE'IB.Œ TRANSMIGRATION SETT1.EMENTS • CENTRAL KAUMANTAN - THE LOWER MENTAYA VAL!.EY lNDOIe;IA. 0ftS10M TRaNSMlGAAnoN l'ftQJECT 1~-"I JollUoIlTA • 1984 DEPARTEMEN TRANSMIGRASI INSTITlIT FRA.NCAIS DE RECHERHE SCIENTI FlOUE PUSUTBANG POLIR LE DEVELOPPEMENT EN COOPERATION ( REPLlBLlK 11\1 001\1 ESI A) ( REPUBIJQUE FRANCAISE) REGIONAL GEOGRAPHY TO DEVELOP TRAI\JSlVliGRATION SETTLEMENTS CENTRAL KALIMANTAN THE LOWER MEI\JTAYA VALLEY O. SEVIN DRS. SUDARMAOJI ORS. PRAYITNO Translated fram French by Mrs. S. Menger INDONESIA - ORSTOM TRANSMIGRATION PROJECT PTA - 44 JAKARTA, 1984 CONTENTS Forward PART CHAPTER 1. The Mentaya estuary CHAPTE R 2. A commercial artery 2.1. Navigation 2.1.1. Few rapids 2.1.2. Navigability 2.1.3. Means of transportation and shops 2.2. Merchandise flow PART Il SAMPIT : port located at the back of an estuary; advanced post in trade with the upper valley. CHAPTER 3. Sampit port 3.1. Location 3.2. Business life and trade 3.2.1. Boat traffie 3.2.2. Freight 3.3. Port traffie 3.3.1. The portsof origin 3.3.2. Destinations 3.3.3. Merchandise 3.3.3.1. 1mports 3.3.3.2. Exports 3.4. Samuda, a satellite port CHAPTER 4. Commerce at Sampit 4.1. The port market 4.2. The night market . Il CHAPTER 5. A town with little controlling power in regional affairs 5.1. Trading houses and the collection of cash craps 5.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+), Transnational Conservation and Access to Land in Jambi, Indonesia
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Hein, Jonas Working Paper Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+), Transnational Conservation and Access to Land in Jambi, Indonesia EFForTS Discussion Paper Series, No. 2 Provided in Cooperation with: Collaborative Research Centre 990: Ecological and Socioeconomic Functions of Tropical Lowland Rainforest Transformation Systems (Sumatra, Indonesia), University of Goettingen Suggested Citation: Hein, Jonas (2013) : Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+), Transnational Conservation and Access to Land in Jambi, Indonesia, EFForTS Discussion Paper Series, No. 2, GOEDOC, Dokumenten- und Publikationsserver der Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:7-webdoc-3904-5 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/117314 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevention and Suppression of Forest Fires
    Bina Hukum Lingkungan P-ISSN 2541-2353, E-ISSN 2541-531X PERKUMPULAN Volume 4, Nomor 1, Oktober 2019 PEMBINA HUKUM LINGKUNGAN IndonesianINDONESIA Environmental Law Lecturer Association DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24970/bhl.v4i1.86 THE LAW OF FOREST IN INDONESIA: PREVENTION AND SUPPRESSION OF FOREST FIRES Ariawan Gunadia, Gunardib, Martonoc ABSTRACT orests have significant function related biological diversity, habitat protection of flora fauna such as F orangutan, tiger, elephant; climate-related functions such as carbon sequestration, air pollution; human settlements, human health, school activities, habitat for people, rural livelihoods; state defense as natural resources such as commercial industrial wood, non-wood forest products, international and national trade; ecotourism, and recreation. However the problem in Indonesia is forest fires. In order to maintain its functions, all the famers, forestry-concession owners, government, local government and private enterprise should prevent and suppress the forest fires through the existing law and regulations such as Constitution Law of 1945, Act Number 5 Year 1990, Act Number 22 Year 1999, Act Number 41 Year 1999, Act Number 1 Year 2009, Act Number 6 Year 1994 and Act Number 17 Year 2004 and aircraft operation conducted by foreign aircraft such as Australia, Canada, Malaysia, Russia and Singapore to assist Indonesian’s forest fires. Keywords: aircraft operation; forest fires; legal ground; liability; responsibility. INTRODUCTION ndonesia is the world’s largest archipelago’s State. It is consisting of 17,508 Islands, about I 6,000 of which are inhibited, the population was 267 million. Global climate change has impact to contribute to the greenhouse gas (GHG) pollutant in terms of carbon emission.1 In addition to, an Indonesian forest fires have created an ecological disaster, economic losses, 8,063 square miles of land burned, health problems, health impact, 21 deaths, more than half a million people suffering respiratory problems and international trade as well.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Peatland and Forest Fires in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia Forest Fires Are Emerging As an Urgent and Globally Significant Environmental Problem
    in English No.08 Newsletter 10 March 2020 Toward the Regeneration of Tropical Peatland Societies Newsletter of Tropical Peatland Society Project,Research Institute for Humanity and Nature 2019 Peatland and Forest Fires in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia Forest fires are emerging as an urgent and globally significant environmental problem. Forest fires have tragic and horrifying impacts on both human and non-human beings. Although it did not receive as much international media attention, there was also a massive forest fire in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, in 2019. In this article, we cover this forest fire and explain our work with the Centre for International Cooperation in Sustainable Management of Tropical Peatland (CIMTROP), Palangka Raya University, toward mitigating the impacts of future forest fires in the region. Kurniawan Eko Susetyo1, Kitso Kusin2, Yulianti Nina2, Yusurum Jagau2, Masahiro Kawasaki3, Daisuke Naito4 In 2019, Indonesia experienced a weak El Niño event, most incidences of fire occurred in Palangka Raya city. which increased the severity of forest and peatland fires In August 2019, there were more than 300 incidences of in both Kalimantan and Sumatra. Some provinces – fire in Palangka Raya – about three times more than in such as Central Kalimantan, South Kalimantan, Riau, Pulang Pisau regency. This past year, fires in Palangka South Sumatra, and Jambi – have been covered in thick Raya began to increase in May – two months earlier smoke and haze for several months. The rapid than in Pulang Pisau. This pattern is borne out by the development of tropical peat swamp forests has research of Yulianti and Hayasaka (2013) and Yulianti et increased Indonesian CO2 emissions dramatically in al.
    [Show full text]
  • The West Papua Dilemma Leslie B
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2010 The West Papua dilemma Leslie B. Rollings University of Wollongong Recommended Citation Rollings, Leslie B., The West Papua dilemma, Master of Arts thesis, University of Wollongong. School of History and Politics, University of Wollongong, 2010. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/3276 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact Manager Repository Services: [email protected]. School of History and Politics University of Wollongong THE WEST PAPUA DILEMMA Leslie B. Rollings This Thesis is presented for Degree of Master of Arts - Research University of Wollongong December 2010 For Adam who provided the inspiration. TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION................................................................................................................................ i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................. ii ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................... iii Figure 1. Map of West Papua......................................................................................................v SUMMARY OF ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................... vi INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • The North Kalimantan Communist Party and the People's Republic Of
    The Developing Economies, XLIII-4 (December 2005): 489–513 THE NORTH KALIMANTAN COMMUNIST PARTY AND THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA FUJIO HARA First version received January 2005; final version accepted July 2005 In this article, the author offers a detailed analysis of the history of the North Kalimantan Communist Party (NKCP), a political organization whose foundation date itself has been thus far ambiguous, relying mainly on the party’s own documents. The relation- ships between the Brunei Uprising and the armed struggle in Sarawak are also referred to. Though the Brunei Uprising of 1962 waged by the Partai Rakyat Brunei (People’s Party of Brunei) was soon followed by armed struggle in Sarawak, their relations have so far not been adequately analyzed. The author also examines the decisive roles played by Wen Ming Chyuan, Chairman of the NKCP, and the People’s Republic of China, which supported the NKCP for the entire period following its inauguration. INTRODUCTION PRELIMINARY study of the North Kalimantan Communist Party (NKCP, here- after referred to as “the Party”), an illegal leftist political party based in A Sarawak, was published by this author in 2000 (Hara 2000). However, the study did not rely on the official documents of the Party itself, but instead relied mainly on information provided by third parties such as the Renmin ribao of China and the Zhen xian bao, the newspaper that was the weekly organ of the now defunct Barisan Sosialis of Singapore. Though these were closely connected with the NKCP, many problems still remained unresolved. In this study the author attempts to construct a more precise party history relying mainly on the party’s own information and docu- ments provided by former members during the author’s visit to Sibu in August 2001.1 –––––––––––––––––––––––––– This paper is an outcome of research funded by the Pache Research Subsidy I-A of Nanzan University for the academic year 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • East Kalimantan
    PROVINCE INFOGRAPHIC EAST KALIMANTAN Nunukan NUNUKAN Tideng Pale Malinau TANA The boundaries and names shown and the TID UNG designations used on this map do not imply KOTA TARAKAN official endorsement or acceptance by the Tarakan United Nations. MA LINAU BULUNGAN Tanjungselor MOST DENSE LEAST DENSE Tanjung Selor Kota Balikpapan Malinau Tanjungredep MOST POPULATED LEAST POPULATED BERA U Kota Samarinda Tana Tidung 14 1,435 KUTAI DISTRICTS VILLAGES TIMUR Putussibau Sangatta 136 KAPU AS Ujoh Bilang HULU SUB-DISTRICTS Bontang SINTANG KOTA MU RUNG KUTAI BONTANG RAYA KARTANEGARA Legend: Sendawar KOTA SAMARIND A Administrative Boundary Tenggarong Samarinda Samarinda Province Province Capital Purukcahu District District Capital BARITO KUTAI GUNUN G UTARA BARAT MA S Population Transportation Muara Teweh PEN AJAM Population counts at 1km resolution Toll road PA SER Kuala Kurun UTARA KOTA Pasangkayu Primary road 0 BALIKPAPAN Secondary road 1 - 5 Balikpapan Port 6 - 25 Penajam BARITO KATINGAN Airport 26 - 50 SELATAN 51 - 100 Buntok KOTA Other KAPU AS TABALONG PASER 101 - 500 PALANGKA Kasongan Volcano 501 - 2,500 RAYA Tanah Grogot Tamiang Water/Lake 2,501 - 5,000 KOTAWARINGIN Layang Tobadak Tanjung 5,000 - 130,000 TIMUR Palangka Raya BARITO Coastline/River TIMUR Palangkaraya Paringin MA MUJU HULU BALANGAN SUNGAI Amuntai TAPIN UTARA Barabai HULU Sampit SUNGAI KOTA PULANG BARITO HULU SUNGAI Mamuju MA MASA SELATAN TEN GAH BARU GEOGRAPHY PISAU KUALA Mamuju TORA JA East Kalimantan is located at 4°24'N - 2°25'S and 113°44' - 119°00'E. The province borders with Malaysia, specifically Sabah and Sarawak (North), the Sulawesi Ocean and Makasar Straits (East), South Kalimantan (South) and West Kalimantan, Central Kalimantan and Malaysia (West).
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Agri's Traceability System – One to One Partnership Commitment
    ASIAN AGRI’S TRACEBILITY SYSTEM: ONE TO ONE PARTNERSHIP COMMITMENT By: Bernard Alexander Riedo Director of Sustainability and Stakeholder Relations ABOUT ASIAN AGRI NORTH SUMATRA RIAU ESTABLISHED IN 1979 JAMBI Asian Agri is a leading national palm oil company that put partnership with smallholders as its Owned Estates 100,000 ha main business model Plasma 60,000 ha Smallholders’ estates Independent 36,000 ha Smallholders’ estates ABOUT ASIAN AGRI RIAU N. SUMATRA 39k Ha (Owned) 35k Ha (Plasma) 43k Ha (Owned) 9 CPO Mills 8 CPO Mills 4 KCPs 2 KCPs 3 Biogas Plants 2 Biogas Plants R&D Center R&D Center Training Center JAMBI 18k Ha (Owned) 23k Ha (Plasma) 4 CPO Mills 3 KCPs One of the largest RSPO, ISPO & ISCC certified oil producers in the world. 2 Biogas Plants The 1st company with RSPO & ISPO certified independent smallholders MILESTONE 1979 1983 1987 1989 1991 Acquired 8,000 1st Palm Oil Mill Pioneered Plasma Established Successfully Ha land bank in in Gunung Melayu schemes in Riau state of the art developed and north Sumatra st & Jambi R&D centre hand over 1 Plasma estate 2006 2005 2002 1996 Implement ZERO BURN Set up seed DxP Progeny during land Asian Agri became Established producing testing to produce member of RSPO Planters School preparation facilities - OPRS of Excellence high yielding seeds 1994 2012 2013 2014 2015 – 2017 7 units of Biogas Set up Tissue & 13 planned Achieve beyond Biggest ISCC & Achieve 50% yield Culture lab to RSPO certified 1 Mn MT CPO Vol improvement in Kick Start Plasma clone oil palms smallholders in replanting
    [Show full text]