DOCSLIB.ORG

West Kalimantan Indonesia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
West Kalimantan Indonesia JURISDICTIONAL SUSTAINABILITY PROFILE WEST KALIMANTAN INDONESIA FOREST NO FOREST DEFORESTATION (1990-2015) LOW-EMISSION RURAL DEVELOPMENT (LED-R) AT A GLANCE DRIVERS OF Illegal logging DEFORESTATION PONTIANAK • Forest cover, including peat swamp forest and mangrove, Large-scale agriculture is 38% of West Kalimantan (WK), with 25% of the province Small-scale illegal mining Large-scale legal mining in conservation & watershed-protection areas • Indigenous peoples (IP) comprise majority of population: Large-scale illegal mining Forest fires Data sources: the Dayak (35%) occupy most inland landscapes & the Socio-economic: BPS Malays (34%) occupy coastal & riverine areas AVERAGE ANNUAL 22.1 Mt CO2 (1990-2012) Deforestation: Derived EMISSIONS FROM Includes above-ground biomass from Ministry of • Agriculture, forestry & fisheries sector contributes 20% DEFORESTATION Forestry data of provincial GDP, with a strong investment in plantation AREA 146.954 km2 crops, particularly oil palm (accounts for 53% of POPULATION 5,001,700 (2018) (2017) agricultural production) HDI 66.26 30 140 GDP USD 8.7 billion Deforestation 124 GDP • From 2011-2016, WK experienced the highest growth 120 (2017, base year 2010) 25 Average yearly deforestation (using in oil palm plantation area nationally, mostly into non- (2017) ² the FREL baseline period 1990-2012) GINI 0.327 100 IDR TRILLIONS forest areas km 20 MAIN ECONOMIC Agriculture 80 • Of the 1.53 Mha converted to industrial oil palm ACTIVITIES Trade 15 plantations between 2000-2016, 0.23 Mha (15%) were 60 Manufacturing & intact forests & 0.40 Mha (26%) were post-1973 logged other industry 10 40 forests RURAL/URBAN 67%/ 33% (2017) HUNDREDS of 5 POPULATION 20 9.2 4.0 3.5 7.5 9.8 6.3 10.0 29.7 3.6 4.6 12.5 5.2 0 0 12 13 14 15 16 17 SPOTLIGHT ON INNOVATION 91-96 97-00 01-03 04-06 07-09 10-11 Essential Ecosystem Areas (Kawasan Ekosistem Esensial – KEEs) with concession owners to designate part of their land as a KEE are established outside of designated State forest lands in areas of that is to be governed by a multi-stakeholder group (incentives and multiple ecosystems, endemic habitats, biological corridors, and high compensations are under discussion). Benefits to LC include fostering economic value for local/traditional livelihoods to support biodiversity cultural preservation, mitigating human-wildlife conflicts, and conservation and ecosystem functioning and reduce deforestation. developing sustainable alternative livelihoods based on non-timber WK – one of the few provinces implementing KEEs – launched it in forest products (NTFP). In support of KEEs, the WK government is 2017 as a strategy to curb deforestation/degradation, representing a currently gathering information on forest functions and developing a collaboration between provincial and district governments, private single land use/tenure map and good governance practices. Remaining sector (concession holders) and local communities (LC). Currently challenges include ensuring effective multi-level and multi-stakeholder being piloted in the Kubu Raya, Kayong Utara, and Ketapang districts, coordination, and uncertainty about success of incentives encouraging KEEs provide opportunities to resolve land use conflicts by working concession companies to set land aside. TIMELINE OF IMPORTANT EVENTS Consortium of Dayak Peoples’ Empowerment & Under the drier conditions of El Nino, out of control WK Indigenous Peoples’ Alliance (AMAN) founded fires (initially set to clear land) and resulting haze led to environmental, economic & health impacts; Kapuas Hulu Regency designated as Conservation Pancur Kasih Dayakology Institute 33% of burned area was peatland Social Work established to District in response to illegal logging Forest Area with Special Purposes (KHDTK) created Foundation improve Dayak Presidential decree ceased export of in Landak Regency to support research & training founded livelihoods illegally logged timber to Malaysia to improve Green Growth Plan (GGP) established conditions for Joined Governor’s WK Forest Reference Emission Level the Dayak Climate & Forest Task (FREL) aligned with national FREL Force (GCF) WK FREL formalized 1980 1990 2000 2010 2018 2020 2030 PLEDGES & COMMITMENTS Provincial REDD+ Strategy & Action Plan (SRAP REDD+)1 1 Reduce land-based GHG emissions ◆ Part of international 60% below BAU (updating the 2013 Regional Action Plan on GHG agreement or forum SRAP-REDD+). 2 Reduce emissions from Emissions Reduction (RAD-GRK)2 forestry & peatlands 58% below BAU; JURISDICTIONAL Reduce emissions from agriculture & Rio Branco Declaration3 ◆ ranching 98% below BAU. 3 Reduce deforestation 80% below baseline. New York Declaration on Forests4 ◆ 4 End deforestation. 5 Contribute to national goal: Reduce emissions 29% (unconditional) to 41% (conditional on Nationally Determined Contribution NATIONAL international support) below BAU. (NDC) to UNFCCC5 ◆ KEY INTERVENTIONS DISINCENTIVES ENABLING MEASURES INCENTIVES ORGANIZATION(S) FUNDING IMPLEMENTING INTERVENTION & FOCUS BENEFICIARIES BILATERAL 1 1 Forest & climate change program (FORCLIME) BILATERAL PUBLIC PUBLIC National & local PROVINCIAL PROVINCIAL governments, LC PUBLIC2 PUBLIC3 Promote sustainable forest management, reduce GHG emissions & improve rural LC livelihoods NATIONAL PUBLIC4 DISTRICT PROVINCIAL PUBLIC2 PUBLIC5 Green Growth Plan (GGP) West Kalimantan Provincial & district DISTRICT PUBLIC5 PRIVATE NATIONAL PRIVATE6 FOR PROFIT6 governments, private INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL sector, LC & IP 7 Increase economic growth & ecosystem protection; improve livelihoods NON-PROFIT7 NON-PROFIT NATIONALPUBLIC9 Community-Focused Investments to Address Deforestation LC in & around 5 FMUs in PROVINCIAL PUBLIC3 & Forest Degradation (CFI-ADD+) Kapuas Hulu & Sintang MULTILATERAL 10 8 DISTRICT PUBLIC districts; National, OTHER PRIVATE FOR Build institutions, local capacity & partnerships to strengthen forest provincial, & local 11 PROFIT management units (FMU); improve REDD+ implementation governments BILATERAL Low-Carbon Forest Investment Strategy (part of SRAP REDD+) BILATERAL PUBLIC12 National & Provincial PUBLIC12 PROVINCIAL Provide legal basis for provincial results-based payments and governments, LC 13 PUBLIC development of low-carbon economy 1 GIZ through KfW. 2 WK Revenue & Expenditure Budget (APBD). 3 WK provincial government. 4 State Income & Expenditure Budget (APBN). 5 District government. 6 Bumitama Agri Ltd. 7 Sustainable Trade Initiative (IDH); 8 Asian Development Bank (ADB) via Forest Investment Program (FIP) under the Strategic Climate Fund of the Climate Investment Funds. 9 Forest Investment Program steering committee: Ministry of Environment & Forestry (MOEF), Presidential Delivery Unit for REDD+ (UKP4), Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of National Development Planning (Bappenas), National Council on Climate Change. 10 Kapuas Hulu & Sintang district governments. 11 PT Hatfield Indonesia. 12 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). 13 WK Offices for Environment & Forestry, Agriculture & Plantations PROGRESS TO JURISDICTIONAL SUSTAINABILITY CHALLENGES & EARLY INTERMEDIATE ADVANCED OPPORTUNITIES CHALLENGES Integrated LED-R • SRAP REDD+, strengthened by GGP, is being mainstreamed into WK’s Medium-Term Development Plan Strategy 2019-2023 (RPJMD) • Low technical capacity in provincial • WK Spatial Plan 2014-2034 (RTRWP) integrates sustainability principles & GGP government agencies leads to sub- Spatial plan • RTRWP pursues integrated, sustainable & equitable development & protects high conservation value (HCV) optimal governance & enforcement & conservation areas (e.g., Heart of Borneo & Betung Kerihun National Park), but does not acknowledge • Coordination between national & customary land rights sub-national government agencies • Approved National One Map initiative aims to address land use conflicts & forestry management needs to clearly define roles in land-use Performance • SRAP REDD+ elaborates on RAD-GRK & WK FREL to set actions & targets for reducing emissions decisions • RPJMD & GGP include some international commitments (e.g., NDC, SDGs) but progress is limited targets • Weak enforcement of RTRWP & forestry Monitoring, • WK govt measured GHG emissions from deforestation & forest degradation from 2012-2016 management laws land use does not reporting & • WK has technical guidelines for measuring forest & non-forest carbon reserves, with plans to create a web- always align with regulations based MRV system in 2019 verification (MRV) • Prioritization of large companies/ Policies & • Various provincial policies & regulations incentivize sustainable landscapes (e.g., KEE) & reward emission plantations interests over IP/LC incentives reductions regarding land use & rights continues • GGP strengthens FMUs, spatial planning, & land titling; establishes partnerships with private sector for to result in conflicts sustainable value chains (e.g., with IDH); & engages LC & farmers Multi-stakeholder • The Joint Secretariat (SekBer) improves coordination between WK govt, private sector, & NGOs on forest OPPORTUNITIES governance management (e.g. overlapping land claims, plantations) & advises on policy development • Implementation of GGP can • SRAP REDD+ Task Force includes private sector, LC, IP, govt, academic & NGO stakeholders support LED-R (e.g., private sector Sustainable • Initiatives such as KHDTK & KEE offer alternative livelihoods for LC based on NTFPs commitments supporting WK’s targets commodity • In 2018, WK’s 1st biomass power plant began operating
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mantle Structure and Tectonic History of SE Asia
    Nature and Demise of the Proto-South China Sea ROBERT HALL, H. TIM BREITFELD SE Asia Research Group, Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, United Kingdom Abstract: The term Proto-South China Sea has been used in a number of different ways. It was originally introduced to describe oceanic crust that formerly occupied the region north of Borneo where the modern South China Sea is situated. This oceanic crust was inferred to have been Mesozoic, and to have been eliminated by subduction beneath Borneo. Subduction was interpreted to have begun in Early Cenozoic and terminated in the Miocene. Subsequently the term was also used for inferred oceanic crust, now disappeared, of quite different age, notably that interpreted to have been subducted during the Late Cretaceous below Sarawak. More recently, some authors have considered that southeast-directed subduction continued until much later in the Neogene than originally proposed, based on the supposition that the NW Borneo Trough and Palawan Trough are, or were recently, sites of subduction. Others have challenged the existence of the Proto-South China Sea completely, or suggested it was much smaller than envisaged when the term was introduced. We review the different usage of the term and the evidence for subduction, particularly under Sabah. We suggest that the term Proto-South China Sea should be used only for the slab subducted beneath Sabah and Cagayan between the Eocene and Early Miocene. Oceanic crust subducted during earlier episodes of subduction in other areas should be named differently and we use the term Paleo- Pacific Ocean for lithosphere subducted under Borneo in the Cretaceous.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciling Economic Growth with Emissions Reductions
    In cooperation with: Financial Cooperation (KfW) This module focuses on the implementation of REDD+ ‘on the ground’. It aims to demonstrate the viability of a pro-poor REDD mechanism in Kalimantan to decision-makers and stakeholders, is the German Development Bank, thus enriching the national and international debate on REDD+ acting on behalf of the German Government. It with practical implementation experience. KfW uses a district carries out cooperation projects with developing based approach in order to prepare selected pilot areas for national and emerging countries. In Indonesia, KfW’s and international carbon markets. KfW finances measures to long-standing cooperation started in 1962 with achieve readiness in three districts of Kalimantan (Kapuas Hulu, its local office in Jakarta established in 1998. KfW Malinau, Berau), realizes an investment programme for REDD has been actively engaged in the forestry sector demonstration activities and develops an innovative and fair since 2008, as mandated by the Federal Ministry incentive payment scheme. for Economic Cooperation and Development Components of the FORCLIME Financial Cooperation (FC) (BMZ) and the Federal Ministry for the Module: Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMUB). Our forestry portfolio includes • Livelihood: improvement of livelihood and capacity building. REDD+, Biodiversity and Integrated Watershed • Forest ecosystem management: forest ecosystem assesment, Management, Ecosystem Restoration and an support to FSC certification, best practice of concession ASEAN Regional Programme. management, qualified data and information. • Documentation and dissemination of lessons learned. • Carbon management: carbon accounting, remote sensing, GIS, and terestrial inventory, benefit sharing financing / carbon Where we work payment. • Carbon management and land use planning: carbon monitoring at site and district level, support communities to conduct .Tanjung Selor carbon monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Kalimantan Communist Party and the People's Republic Of
    The Developing Economies, XLIII-4 (December 2005): 489–513 THE NORTH KALIMANTAN COMMUNIST PARTY AND THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA FUJIO HARA First version received January 2005; final version accepted July 2005 In this article, the author offers a detailed analysis of the history of the North Kalimantan Communist Party (NKCP), a political organization whose foundation date itself has been thus far ambiguous, relying mainly on the party’s own documents. The relation- ships between the Brunei Uprising and the armed struggle in Sarawak are also referred to. Though the Brunei Uprising of 1962 waged by the Partai Rakyat Brunei (People’s Party of Brunei) was soon followed by armed struggle in Sarawak, their relations have so far not been adequately analyzed. The author also examines the decisive roles played by Wen Ming Chyuan, Chairman of the NKCP, and the People’s Republic of China, which supported the NKCP for the entire period following its inauguration. INTRODUCTION PRELIMINARY study of the North Kalimantan Communist Party (NKCP, here- after referred to as “the Party”), an illegal leftist political party based in A Sarawak, was published by this author in 2000 (Hara 2000). However, the study did not rely on the official documents of the Party itself, but instead relied mainly on information provided by third parties such as the Renmin ribao of China and the Zhen xian bao, the newspaper that was the weekly organ of the now defunct Barisan Sosialis of Singapore. Though these were closely connected with the NKCP, many problems still remained unresolved. In this study the author attempts to construct a more precise party history relying mainly on the party’s own information and docu- ments provided by former members during the author’s visit to Sibu in August 2001.1 –––––––––––––––––––––––––– This paper is an outcome of research funded by the Pache Research Subsidy I-A of Nanzan University for the academic year 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • East Kalimantan
    PROVINCE INFOGRAPHIC EAST KALIMANTAN Nunukan NUNUKAN Tideng Pale Malinau TANA The boundaries and names shown and the TID UNG designations used on this map do not imply KOTA TARAKAN official endorsement or acceptance by the Tarakan United Nations. MA LINAU BULUNGAN Tanjungselor MOST DENSE LEAST DENSE Tanjung Selor Kota Balikpapan Malinau Tanjungredep MOST POPULATED LEAST POPULATED BERA U Kota Samarinda Tana Tidung 14 1,435 KUTAI DISTRICTS VILLAGES TIMUR Putussibau Sangatta 136 KAPU AS Ujoh Bilang HULU SUB-DISTRICTS Bontang SINTANG KOTA MU RUNG KUTAI BONTANG RAYA KARTANEGARA Legend: Sendawar KOTA SAMARIND A Administrative Boundary Tenggarong Samarinda Samarinda Province Province Capital Purukcahu District District Capital BARITO KUTAI GUNUN G UTARA BARAT MA S Population Transportation Muara Teweh PEN AJAM Population counts at 1km resolution Toll road PA SER Kuala Kurun UTARA KOTA Pasangkayu Primary road 0 BALIKPAPAN Secondary road 1 - 5 Balikpapan Port 6 - 25 Penajam BARITO KATINGAN Airport 26 - 50 SELATAN 51 - 100 Buntok KOTA Other KAPU AS TABALONG PASER 101 - 500 PALANGKA Kasongan Volcano 501 - 2,500 RAYA Tanah Grogot Tamiang Water/Lake 2,501 - 5,000 KOTAWARINGIN Layang Tobadak Tanjung 5,000 - 130,000 TIMUR Palangka Raya BARITO Coastline/River TIMUR Palangkaraya Paringin MA MUJU HULU BALANGAN SUNGAI Amuntai TAPIN UTARA Barabai HULU Sampit SUNGAI KOTA PULANG BARITO HULU SUNGAI Mamuju MA MASA SELATAN TEN GAH BARU GEOGRAPHY PISAU KUALA Mamuju TORA JA East Kalimantan is located at 4°24'N - 2°25'S and 113°44' - 119°00'E. The province borders with Malaysia, specifically Sabah and Sarawak (North), the Sulawesi Ocean and Makasar Straits (East), South Kalimantan (South) and West Kalimantan, Central Kalimantan and Malaysia (West).
    [Show full text]
  • (COVID-19) Situation Report
    Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) World Health Organization Situation Report - 64 Indonesia 21 July 2021 HIGHLIGHTS • As of 21 July, the Government of Indonesia reported 2 983 830 (33 772 new) confirmed cases of COVID-19, 77 583 (1 383 new) deaths and 2 356 553 recovered cases from 510 districts across all 34 provinces.1 • During the week of 12 to 18 July, 32 out of 34 provinces reported an increase in the number of cases while 17 of them experienced a worrying increase of 50% or more; 21 provinces (8 new provinces added since the previous week) have now reported the Delta variant; and the test positivity proportion is over 20% in 33 out of 34 provinces despite their efforts in improving the testing rates. Indonesia is currently facing a very high transmission level, and it is indicative of the utmost importance of implementing stringent public health and social measures (PHSM), especially movement restrictions, throughout the country. Fig. 1. Geographic distribution of cumulative number of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Indonesia across the provinces reported from 15 to 21 July 2021. Source of data Disclaimer: The number of cases reported daily is not equivalent to the number of persons who contracted COVID-19 on that day; reporting of laboratory-confirmed results may take up to one week from the time of testing. 1 https://covid19.go.id/peta-sebaran-covid19 1 WHO Indonesia Situation Report - 64 who.int/indonesia GENERAL UPDATES • On 19 July, the Government of Indonesia reported 1338 new COVID-19 deaths nationwide; a record high since the beginning of the pandemic in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Snapshot (April - May 2013)
    INDONESIA: Humanitarian Snapshot (April - May 2013) Highlights The incidence and humanitarian impact of floods, landslides and whirlwinds increased in April and May Some 220,000 persons were affected or displaced in about 198 natural disasters during April and May – an increase since the last reporting period. Floods from Bengawan Solo ACEH River inundated parts six district RIAU ISLANDS in Central and East Java NORTH SUMATRA Provinces. The floods killed 11 EAST KALIMANTAN GORONTALO NORTH SULAWESI NORTH MALUKU persons and affected up to ten RIAU WEST KALIMANTAN thousand persons. WEST SUMATRA CENTRAL SULAWESI WEST PAPUA CENTRAL KALIMANTAN The alert level status of three JAMBI BANGKA BELITUNG ISLANDS SOUTH KALIMANTAN WEST SULAWESI SOUTH SUMATRA MALUKU volcanoes has been increased BENGKULU SOUTH SULAWESI SOUTHEAST SULAWESI to level 3: Mt Soputan (North PAPUA LAMPUNG Sulawesi), Mt Papandayan (in West Java) and Mt. BANTEN WEST JAVA Sangeangapi (in West Nusa CENTRAL JAVA Tenggara). EAST JAVA BALI EAST NUSA TENGGARA WEST NUSA TENGGARA Whirlwind, despite being the second most frequent disaster event, caused a comparatively smaller humanitarian impact than other disaster types. Legend 41 10 1 Disaster Events (April - May 2013) April 2013 104 NATURAL DISASTER FIGURES Indonesia: Province Population In million May 2013 94 Disaster events by type (Apr - May 2013) There are 198 natural disaster events 50 < 1,5 1,5 - 3,5 3,5 - 7 7 - 12 12 - 43 April period of April - May 2013. 40 Number of Casualties (April - May 2013) May 30 68 117 casualties April 2013 20 May 2013 49 Total affected population 10 0 220,051 persons Flood Flood and landslide Whirlwind Landslide Other The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations Creation date: 28 June 2013 Sources: OCHA, BPS, BMKG, BIG, www.indonesia.humanitarianresponse.info www.unocha.org www.reliefweb.int.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia As a Poorly Performing State? Andrew Macintyre
    04-1-933286-05-9 chap4 4/22/06 10:48 AM Page 117 4 Indonesia as a Poorly Performing State? Andrew MacIntyre n the years since the historic upheavals of 1998, Indonesia has struggled Iwith the twin challenges of rebuilding its economy and constructing a viable framework for democratic governance. This has been a turbulent period, with prolonged economic difficulties, weak and frequently changing political leadership, and widespread problems of sectarian violence that have called the very territorial integrity of the republic into question. These recent travails have brought greater international attention to the country than did the three decades of rapid economic growth and strict but stable authoritar- ian rule under former president General Suharto. Understandably, there has been much worried discussion in policy circles within the United States and elsewhere about whether Indonesia, rather than embarking on a new and optimistic democratic era, is in fact in danger of becoming caught in a stag- nant or even downward developmental trajectory. Is Indonesia, the fourth most populous country in the world, at risk of developing that combustible mix of economic stagnation and systematically weak governance that charac- terizes the phenomenon of poorly performing states? The aim of this chapter is to assess Indonesia’s developmental trajectory, giving particular emphasis to outlining the economic and political challenges the country is wrestling with, and to reflect upon the implications of Indone- sia’s trajectory for U.S. policy. I begin with an overview of Indonesia’s past 117 04-1-933286-05-9 chap4 4/22/06 10:48 AM Page 118 118 Andrew MacIntyre record of economic and political development and then focus on the con- temporary situation and whether Indonesia is appropriately considered a poorly performing state.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Composite Measure of Regional Sustainable Development in Indonesia
    sustainability Article Development of a Composite Measure of Regional Sustainable Development in Indonesia Hania Rahma 1, Akhmad Fauzi 2,* , Bambang Juanda 2 and Bambang Widjojanto 3 1 Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia, Kampus UI Salemba, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia; [email protected] 2 Regional and Rural Development Planning, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Law, Trisaksi University, Jakarta 10150, Indonesia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 28 September 2019; Accepted: 21 October 2019; Published: 22 October 2019 Abstract: Sustainable development has been the main agenda for Indonesia’s development at both the national and regional levels. Along with laws concerning the national development plan and regional development that mandate a sustainable development framework, the government has issued President Regulation No. 59/2017 on the implementation of sustainable development goals. The issuance of these recent regulatory frameworks indicates that sustainable development should be taken seriously in development processes. Nevertheless, several factors affect the achievement of sustainable development. This paper investigates how economic, social, and environmental factors could be integrated into regional sustainable development indicators using a new composite index. The index is calculated based on a simple formula that could be useful for practical implementation at the policy level. Three measures of indices are developed: arithmetic, geometric, and entropy-based. The indices are aggregated to be used for comparison purposes among regions in terms of their sustainability performance. Lessons learned are then drawn for policy analysis and several recommendations are provided to address challenges in the implementation stages. Keywords: regional sustainable development index; sustainable development; composite index; regional development goals 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. PRESENT CONDITIONS of the PRINCIPAL RIVER PORT in KALIMANTAN 4.1 Regional Development Plans 4.1.1 General (1) Kalimantan 1) T
    4. PRESENT CONDITIONS OF THE PRINCIPAL RIVER PORT IN KALIMANTAN 4.1 Regional Development Plans 4.1.1 General (1) Kalimantan 1) Topography Indonesia Kalimantan occupies about three fourths of Kalimantan Island. Many rivers flow from mountain areas and run into Karimantan Strait, Jawa Sea and Makassar Strait, formulating huge lowlands. Our target ports, Ports of Pontianak, Kumai, Sampit and Samarinda, are located near estuaries of Kapuas River, Kumai River, Sampit River and Mahakam River respectively. 2) Area and Population Area and population of Kalimantan account for 547,891 km2 and 11.4 million (1999) as shown in Table 4.1.1. Population density of the three provinces is very low comparing the state average. Table 4.1.1 Area and Population in Kalimantan Population Area Annual Province 1990 1995 1999 Density (km2) Growth Rate (1,000) (1,000) (1,000) (pax/km2) 90/95 (%) West Kalimantan 146,807 3,229 3,636 3,943 2.24 26.9 Central Kalimantan 153,564 1,396 1,627 1,771 2.68 11.5 South Kalimantan 36,535 2,597 2,893 3,103 2.00 84.9 East Kalimantan 210,985 1,877 2,314 2,579 3.59 12.2 Kalimantan Total 547,891 9,099 10,470 11,396 2.53 20.8 Indonesia 1,937,179 179,379 194,755 206,517 1.58 106.6 Based on Population Censuses 1990&1995 and Projection at Intercensal Population Survey 1995 Source: Statistic Indonesia 1999, BPS 3) Transportation Network Transportation in Kalimantan has not been well developed. Trans Kalimantan Highway has been proposed to connect main cities in Kalimantan is under construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Sumatera and Kalimantan Fires and Haze
    Emergency Situation Report # 1 29 August 2006 Sumatera and Kalimantan Fires and Haze Background The annual forest fires have arrived again in many parts of Kalimantan and Sumatra Island, where over 7,000 hotspots have sprung up, producing choking smoke that has spilled over to neighboring Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand and Brunei. It started taking place in May and the number of hotspots increased by the beginning of July 2006. According to government officials and environmentalists, forest fires in Indonesia are mostly caused by humans (community people and companies), following slash and burn methods to clear land for plantations. Currently, the number of hotspots continues to fluctuate. Type of Disaster Forest Fires and Haze. Location The forest fires are mainly concentrated in Sumatra (Riau, Jambi and South Sumatra Provinces) and Kalimantan (Central, East and West) Islands. Sumatera Island Kalimantan Island Notes: The red circles show the area where the forest and land fires are taking place. 1 Emergency Situation Report # 1 29 August 2006 Current Situation According to the media, 6,800 hectares of land in Riau Province and 10,000 hectares in Jambi Province have been burnt. In Palangkaraya, South Kalimantan Province, visibility in the city was 50 to 100 meters in the morning and only a little better in the afternoon. The visibility in Pontianak City, West Kalimantan Province, is less than 100 meters and it disturbs city traffic. The picture to the left shows haze resulting from land and forest fires in Pontianak. NOAA Satellite detected there are 544 hot spots in West Kalimantan. Impact - The smoke poses health threats and disrupts air and land transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia: Durable Solutions Needed for Protracted Idps As New Displacement Occurs in Papua
    13 May 2014 INDONESIA Durable solutions needed for protracted IDPs as new displacement occurs in Papua At least three million Indonesians have been internally displaced by armed conflict, violence and human rights violations since 1998. Most displacement took place between 1998 and 2004 when Indonesia, still in the early stages of democratic transition and decentralisation, experienced a period of intense social unrest characterised by high levels of inter-commu- nal, inter-faith and separatist violence. Although the overwhelming majority of 34 families displaced since 2006 have been living in this abandoned building in Mata- Indonesia’s IDPs have long returned home at ram, West Nusa Tenggara province, Indonesia. (Photo: Dwianto Wibowo, 2012) least 90,000 remain in protracted displacement, over a decade after the end of these conflicts. Many are unable to return due to lack of government as- sistance to recover lost rights to housing, land and property. In areas affected by inter-communal violence communities have been transformed and segregated along religious or ethnic lines. Unresolved land dis- putes are rife with former neighbours often unwilling to welcome IDPs back. IDPs who sought to locally in- tegrate in areas where they have been displaced, or who have been relocated by the government, have also struggled to rebuild their lives due to lack of access to land, secure tenure, livelihoods and basic services. Over the past ten years, new displacement has also continued in several provinces of Indonesia, although at much reduced levels. According to official government figures some 11,500 people were displaced between 2006 and 2014, including 3,000 in 2013 alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccination and Reiterated That Vaccination Does Not Guarantee 100% Protection Against the Virus
    Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) World Health Organization Situation Reportn - 70 Indonesia 1 September 2021 HIGHLIGHTS • As of 1 September, the Government of Indonesia reported 4 100 138 (10 337 new) confirmed cases of COVID-19, 133 676 (653 new) deaths and 3 776 891 recovered cases from 510 districts across 34 provinces.1 As of the same date, the number of people fully vaccinated per 100 population was 13.4 nationwide; DKI Jakarta reported the highest number among all provinces (56.3).2 • As of 29 August, the weekly case incidence per 100 000 population nationwide, in Java-Bali and non-Java-Bali regions were 48.6, 44.0 and 54.9, respectively. The weekly case incidence in non-Java-Bali region has remained at the level of high incidence over the past six weeks. • From 23 to 25 August, WHO supported the Ministry of Health to conduct a monitoring meeting to review the implementation of Intra-Action Review (IAR) recommendations. During the meeting, achievements in response were shared, persistent challenges and gaps were identified and recommendations for the ten pillars of the COVID-19 response were formulated (page 13). Fig. 1. Geographic distribution of confirmed COVID-19 cases reported in the last seven days per 100 000 population in Indonesia across provinces reported from 26 August to 1 September 2021. Source of data Disclaimer: The number of cases reported daily is not equivalent to the number of persons who contracted COVID-19 on that day; reporting of laboratory-confirmed results may take up to one week from the time of testing.
    [Show full text]