Agro-Morphological Characterization of Some Wild Wheat (Aegilops L
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Turk J Agric For 30 (2006) 387-398 © TÜB‹TAK Agro-Morphological Characterization of Some Wild Wheat (Aegilops L. and Triticum L.) Species Alptekin KARAGÖZ, Necmi P‹LANALI, Turgay POLAT Central Research Institute for Field Crops, P.O. Box: 226, 06042 Ankara - TURKEY Received: 20.03.2006 Abstract: Wild wheat (Aegilops L. and Triticum L.) populations were collected from different regions of Turkey and characterized for 5 basic traits, in order to study their agro-morphological characteristics and variation among populations. Material of the study consisted of 112 populations of wild wheat and 12 populations of cultivated wheat. Cultivated einkorn (T. monococcum L. subsp. monococcum) and cultivated emmer (T. turgidum L. subsp. dicoccon (Shrank) Thell.) were used as checks for Triticum species. Among the Aegilops material studied, Ae. tauschii Coss. var. meyeri (Griseb. ex Ledeb.) has not been defined in the flora of Turkey before and is characterized agromorphologically for the first time in this study. Materials were transplanted to Haymana-Ankara Research Farm of the Central Research Institute for Field Crops after being germinated in a greenhouse in fall 2002. Populations were characterized for plant height, number of days to heading, growth habit, number of stems per plant and spike length. All observations and measurements were performed on the same randomly selected plants. Mean values and coefficient of variation were computed for all the populations. The highest variation was recorded for number of stems, while the lowest was for plant habit. Clusters based on a Euclidian similarity matrix ranked the species according to the sections they are located in. Considerable variation was observed, even between populations collected from nearby sites. It was concluded that existing ex-situ conservation programs should take into consideration that fact by sampling over short distances in order to capture as much of the variation as possible. Key Words: Wild wheat, Aegilops, Triticum, characterization, variation Kimi Yabani Bu¤day (Aegilops L. ve Triticum L.) Türlerinin Agro-Morfolojik Karakterizasyonu Özet: Yabani bu¤day (Aegilops L. ve Triticum L) populasyonlar› Türkiye’nin de¤iflik bölgelerinden toplanarak, befl temel özelli¤i ve populasyonlar aras› farkl›l›klar› ortaya koymak amac›yla agro-morfolojik yönden karakterize edilmifltir. Bu¤day›n 112 yabani ve 12 kültür örne¤i bu çal›flman›n materyalini oluflturmufltur. Yabani siyez (T. monococcum L. subsp. monococcum) ve yabani gernik (T. turgidum L. subsp. dicoccon (Shrank) Thell.) örnekleri, Triticum türleri için kontrol olarak kullan›lm›flt›r. Materyal içinde yer alan Ae. tauschii Coss. var. meyeri (Griseb. ex Ledeb.) türü Türkiye’nin floras›nda daha önce tan›mlanmam›fl olup ilk kez bu çal›flmayla agromorfolojik karakterizasyonu yap›lm›flt›r. Tohum örnekleri 2002 y›l› sonbahar›nda serada çimlendirildikten sonra, Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araflt›rma Enstitüsü’nün Haymana’daki Araflt›rma ve Üretme Çiftli¤ine dikilmifltir. Populasyonlar bitki boyu, baflaklanma gün say›s›, geliflme formu, bitki bafl›na sap say›s› ve baflak uzunluklar› bak›m›ndan karakterize edilmifltir. Tüm ölçüm ve gözlemler, rastgele seçilen 5 bitki üzerinde yürütülmüfltür. Her populasyon için ortalamalar ve varyasyon katsay›lar› hesaplanm›flt›r. En yüksek de¤iflim katsay›s› sap say›s›nda, en düflü¤ü ise geliflme formunda bulunmufltur. Kümeleme Analizi türlerin kendi özel gruplar›nda yer ald›¤›n› göstermifl, birbirine çok yak›n alanlardan toplanan örnekler aras›nda bile farkl›l›klar oldu¤u saptanm›flt›r. Bu durumda ex-situ koruma programlar›n›n mümkün olan en genifl varyasyonu yakalayabilmeleri için k›sa mesafelerde örnekleme yapmalar›n›n gerekli oldu¤u sonucuna var›lm›flt›r. Anahtar Sözcükler: Yabani bu¤day, Aegilops, Triticum, karakterizasyon, de¤iflim * Correspondence to: [email protected] 387 Agro-Morphological Characterization of Some Wild Wheat (Aegilops L. and Triticum L.) Species Introduction has also been a matter of discussion among scientists. It Rapid changes in climatic and environmental was claimed by Dvorák (1998) that the B genome is conditions constitute significant threats to cultivated related to the genome of Ae. speltoides. Recently, Gitte et crops for adaptation to newly emerging conditions. Due al. (2006) declared that the hitherto enigmatic B genome to universal problems such as air and soil pollution, is derived from Ae. speltoides and the A genome is depletion of the ozone layer, and global warming, it is derived from T. urartu. There is full consensus on the inevitable that popular cultivars of today are not likely to donor of the D genome, which is Ae. tauschii (Kimber and be able to cope with these challenges in the near future. Feldman, 1987; Waines, 1997; Gitte et al., 2006). Stress conditions played a major role in the evolution of The genus Aegilops (except Aegilops mutica Boiss.) living things. Wild relatives of cultivated crops that have consists of 5 sections: Sitopsis (6 spp.), Aegilops (8 spp.), been sustaining under intensive stress conditions for Vertebrata (5 spp.), Cylindropyrum (2 spp.) and thousand of years, by modifying themselves to adapt to Comopyrum (2 spp.) (Van Slageren, 1994). newly emerging conditions, constitute a considerable Kün (1979) agro-morphologically characterized and source (Nevo et al., 2002). Present conditions call for evaluated some pathological and technological characteristics urgent measures. The study of plant material with of 222 wild wheat species. The study was performed under desired traits through characterization programs is an the following 5 headings: (1) evolution and nomenclature of essential step for effective utilization of crop germplasm. wheat, (2) studies to give male sterility characteristics to Long before the development of sophisticated wheat, (3) role of wild wheat in gaining disease resistance, methods for gene introgression between wild and (4) role of wild wheat in giving quality traits to wheat, and cultivated, Gökgöl (1935) reported that northern (5) capability of wild wheat in natural vegetation. In that European countries had already begun to test the wild study, it was reported that all populations of Ae. speltoides relatives in their breeding programs. var. speltoides, Ae. speltoides var. ligustica and Ae. biuncialis Playing a significant role in feeding the world were resistant to yellow rust; plant height ranged between population, wheat is considered a fundamental crop. 26.8 (Ae. umbelleulata) and 97.7 cm (Ae. mutica); spike Wheat is assumed to have originated from the Fertile length ranged between 27.2 (Ae. umbellulata) and 273.1 Crescent (Harlan, 1981). Wild relatives of wheat are quite mm (Ae. mutica); and protein content of the species was up widespread in Turkey, especially in the southeast. It is to 32.6% (Ae. umbellulata). agreed that diploid wheat was first cultivated in Peflkircio¤lu (1996) characterized and evaluated 13 Karacada¤, which is located in southeast Turkey, and soon Aegilops and 3 wild Triticum species of Turkish origin for dispersed to the other parts of the world (Heun et al., their agro-morphological, pathological, and quality traits. 1997; Diamond, 1997; Nesbit and Samuel, 1998; Lev- Among the material, plant height ranged between 16.6 Yadun et al., 2000). Triticum L. and Aegilops L. have (Ae. juvenalis) and 112.0 cm (Ae. mutica); spike length several species in 3 ploidy levels, namely diploid (2n = 14), ranged between 2.4 (Ae. ovata) and 23.3 cm (Ae. tetraploid (2n = 28) and hexaploid (2n = 42). Davis mutica); protein content ranged between 19.9% (Ae. (1985) reported that 16 Aegilops and 4 wild Triticum speltoides) and 26.2% (Ae. juvenalis). species exist in Turkey. Kimber and Feldman (1987) state Wild relatives of crops play a significant role in the that the number of wild wheat relatives is 27 in the world, development of cultivars with desired characteristics. 20 of which are in Turkey. Having adapted to a variety of Srivastava and Damania (1989) reported that wild harsh conditions accompanied by heavy grazing by relatives provide valuable genes for disease resistance, domestic animals, wild wheat species have sustained their high protein content, tillering, drought resistance and diversity to date. other economically desirable attributes. Lange and The evolution of modern wheat and the relation with Balkema-Boomstra (1988) stated that progenitors of Aegilops species have been the concern of many scientists cultivated species should be considered an important for many years. Three genomes, namely A, B (S) and D, source of variability for breeding genetic bases of took part in the evolution of modern wheats. The donor cultivated crops. Efficient utilization of these species of the A genome is assumed to be T. urartu (Valkoun et requires detailed knowledge of their genetic, cytogenetic al., 1997; Gitte et al., 2006). The donor of the B genome and agromorphological characteristics. 388 A. KARAGÖZ, N. P‹LANALI, T. POLAT The primary aim of this study was to examine the replaced by modern cultivars. Data on the place of origin agromorphological characteristics of wild wheat species and altitude of the populations are given in Table 2. (Aegilops and Triticum) including the primary relatives Among the populations tested, Ae. tauschii Coss. var. that have a potential to be used in breeding programs. meyeri (Griseb. ex Ledeb.) samples were collected from fianlıurfa province. This species of the genus Aegilops has Materials and Methods not been described in the flora of Turkey and is characterized for the first time in this study. The material consisted of 124 wheat populations, 112 of which were collected in marginal areas of southeast Seeds of the material were germinated in the and east Turkey. Scientific names of the experimental greenhouse in September 2001 and transplanted at material, their genomes, and number and status of the Haymana-Ankara Research Farm of the Central Research samples are given in Table 1. Wild materials were Institute for Field Crops in October 2001. Each plot was collected during 2 major periods, 1987 (K›z›ltan et al., 3 m long; distance between rows was 35 cm and between 1990) and 1994-1998 (Karagöz, 1996), and several plants was 20 cm (Delacy et al., 2000: Karagöz and others.