Finnair Capital Markets Day 2014

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Finnair Capital Markets Day 2014 Welcome to Finnair Capital Markets Day 22 May 2014, Helsinki 1 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Today’s Agenda Topic Presenter Time Pages Welcome by the Chairman of the Board Klaus Heinemann, Chairman 13:00 - Delivering on Strategy Pekka Vauramo, CEO 13:20 6-25 Greg Kaldahl, SVP Resource Network development and JBA's 14:00 26-54 Management Break 14:30 Commercial Strategy- Closing the revenue gap Allister Paterson, CCO 15:00 55-65 Juha Järvinen, Managing Cargo’s role in Asian growth 15:30 66-76 Director of Finnair Cargo Break 15:45 Fleet and funding strategy Erno Hildén, CFO 16:00 77-100 Closing remarks Pekka Vauramo, CEO 16:40 - Cocktails and informal discussion 17:00 2 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 The Finnair opportunity Our strategic targets and roadmap to reaching them Pekka Vauramo, CEO Finnair Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 3 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Finnair is a network airline connecting Asia and Europe North- Leisure Atlantic 11 % More than Over 5 % 9 million 60 European Fleet of 77 Finland passengers and aircraft, of 4 % and MEUR which 44 Asia 15 long-haul 49 % operated by 2,400 in destinations Europe revenue in Finnair. 31 % 2013 (Summer 2014) 2013 ASK split 4 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Major achievements since CMD 2012 Cost structure Commercial Operations Network Financing 5 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 We have built one of the best operational airlines in the world... By focusing on: 2013 performance European Finnair benchmark* • Structure, size, governance Punctuality 84.2% 89.4% • Commitment to quality and safety Regularity 98.9% 99.8% • Operational processes Bags (/1000 pax) 9.6 8.1 • Hub management Connection reliability 98% 98.8% Safety 1st-3rd** • Vendor management * Source: AEA ** JACDEC 2013 safety ranking. JACDEC =Jet Airliner Crash Data Evaluation Centre. 6 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 ...and improved cost efficiency & asset utilization Improved CASK Higher utilization 0,08 16 0,071 0,070 0,071 0,069 +0.6% 0,07 +3.6% 14 +1.3% +14.9% +1.6% +6.0% 0,06 12 0,05 -4.6% 10 -4.1% -3.3% 0,04 +8.4% 8 +7.8% +7.6% €cents 0,03 6 0,02 4 0,01 Block hours/day 2 0 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013 CASK ex-fuel Fuel Narrowbody Widebody 7 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Finnair share and bond price development Finnair share price development Finnair Bond price development 1 Jan 2012-16 May 2014 since 27 Aug 2013 Finnair 3,50 market 1 800 000cap 105,5 Finnair MEUR 378 3,30 market cap (16 1May 600 2014) 000 105,0 3,10 MEUR 295 1 400 000 (31 Dec 2011) 104,5 2,90 1 200 000 104,0 2,70 1 000 000 2,50 103,5 800 000 2,30 103,0 Finnair 600 000 2,10 market cap 102,5 400 000 1,90 MEUR 283 (3 Dec 2012) 102,0 1,70 200 000 1,50 0 101,5 Volume, shares Close, EUR 8 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Delivering on strategy for profitable growth Doubling Asian revenues by 2020 from 2010 level Growing traffic via Helsinki by optimising its strategic location Creating shareholder value - delivering 6% operational EBIT 9 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Doubling Asian revenues by 2020 10 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Doubling Asian revenue – Where are we now? Asian traffic revenue, MEUR 42% of 2013 passenger revenue from Asian traffic CAGR 2014–2020 6.96% 3% 9% 9% 42% 37% Asia Europe Domestic Leisure North Atlantic * Based on guidance given on 7 May 2014:”Finnair estimates 2014 turnover to be close to 2013 levels.” 11 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Europe-Asia travel expected to increase more than 100% by 2020 Passenger flows and hub throughput (Asia and Europe, 2020E) 2010 PAX flows: 130 million Europe – Middle East /Asia (pax/yr) 2020E CAGR (2020E) 60 million +6.3% PAX throughput at major (2010) international airports (pax/yr) M=million M-East 180M China's Notes: top 3 1. Pax throughput includes both domestic, international and terminal passengers. Figures hubs include both inbound and outbound pax calculated on basis of country-region pairs. BKK 2. Data available for Mainland China airports does not disaggregate domestic and 300M international passengers. 90M 3. PAX throughput Middle East includes Dubai airport (112m); Doha (38m); Abu Dhabi KUL (26m). China includes Beijing (155m); Guangzhou (88m); Shanghai Pudong (83m) HKG Source: 80M IATA, ATI database, BCG analysis; IATA Country Forecasts; BCG Analysis; World Bank. SIN 120M 90M 12 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 China’s second tier cities offer great potential 2010 GDP for urban clusters Urban clusters in China and their hub USD Billions cities Shanghai 527 Changchun- Switzerland 527 Harbin Jingjinji Liao central- Huhehaote Jingjinji 475 south Taiyuan Shandong Central Belgium 469 Guanzhong BylandHefei Yangzi mid-lower Nanjing Chengdu Shanghai Shandong 418 Chongqing Hangzhou Nanchang Changzhutan Coast West Austria 378 Kunming Shenzhen Guangzhou (includes Foshan) Guangzhou 357 Nanning 0 200 400 600 Source: Dominic Barton, 2013. 13 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Joint Business Agreement in Europe-Japan traffic strengthens our position in Japan 35% JAPAN 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% Market share in EUR-JP vv Traffic* 0% • After joining the SJB we are now a part of the largest joint business in Europe–Japan vv. traffic * Source: SRS Q2 2014. 14 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Our strengths in Asia – Europe transfer traffic Shortest and fastest Asia-Europe route Early mover in Europe-Asia direct flights One of world's most punctual airlines Helsinki airport hub Strong Nordic brand appeal On-going long-haul product development 15 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Growing traffic via Helsinki 16 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Highly efficient Helsinki hub supports Asia- Europe traffic growth Room for growth in Helsinki-Vantaa... ...with 24h rotation benefits to Asia • 3 runways • Sustainable competitive advantage and cost • 35 min minimum connection time benefits: • Uncongested airspace – Fastest connections between North- Eastern Asia and Northern Europe – Very high aircraft utilisation in long-haul traffic – Less need for additional crew members due to flight time restrictions – Smaller fuel consumption due to shorter flight times © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 17 Cost competitive European feeder network a necessity for Asian traffic growth European competitive landscape We focus on • Lowering cost base in short-haul flying – Labour costs – Possible alternative measures • Continuing Flybe cooperation • Decision on short haul fleet renewal in the next 18-24 months 18 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Creating shareholder value 19 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Our key mid-term priorities The Tools Fleet strategy Financing Strategic partnerships The Building Blocks New Digital Finnair Network Strategy Cargo The Foundation Competitive Cost Leading Commercial Safe, Efficient Structure Strategy Operations 20 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 We are well on track in achieving cost savings – flight crew labour costs still under negotiation Savings reached by 22 May 2014: MEUR 167 Total target Phase I: MEUR 140 MEUR 200 Other 136 4 23 Phase II: MEUR 60 Pilots 17 Cabin 18 Technical & ground services 4 8 Other employee groups 17 Phase I realised Phase I additional saving reached Phase II realised Phase II remaining target 21 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 We are building the foundation for growth • Competitive cost structure will be key Growth for profitable growth, therefore cost 2016 savings remain in our focus. 2015 • As a vital part of our topline growth, we continue to implement our new Revenue enhancement A350s Commercial strategy and closing the identified revenue gap. 2014 • First A350s enter our fleet next year, and we are ready to grow our traffic Cost savings building on our existing strengths. 22 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Thank you! Questions? 23 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Finnair Network Development The Role of Schedule, Partnerships and Route Development In Building the Silk Road Greg Kaldahl, SVP Resource Management Finnair Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 24 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Silk Road Revisited In CMD 2012 we shared... What Have We Done Since Then • Industry complexity and changing • Opened two new seasonal routes to demographics Xi’an and Hanoi • The strength of Helsinki’s geographic • Entered joint business arrangements position for Atlantic and Japan flying • Finnair’s strategy to win in dynamic • Taken delivery of five A321 Sharklets times and retired our small B757 fleet • Our methodology for entering new – Operating cost advantage from commonality routes • Established our baseline long-haul fleet plan – Allows for more/less growth based on market conditions 25 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Today’s Agenda • Schedule Structure – Helsinki Plan • Joint Business Agreements – What are they? – What do they mean for Finnair? – How do we get the most from these agreements? • Route Development – Are there any good markets left? – Where do we go from here? – Will we double Asian revenues by 2020? 26 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Schedule Structure A Passenger Friendly Hub 27 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 Helsinki offers Finnair a competitive advantage... HEL LHR FRA AMS CDG Ease of transfer Uncongested airspace Runway capacity Cost competitiveness Geographic location to Asia Departure punctuality 28 © Finnair | Capital Markets Day, 22 May 2014 ...but our growth has created some congestion ASIA & NORTH AMERICA 0700 12001700Hub 2000 2400 congestion EUROPE & DOMESTIC Europe double daily flights (incl.
Recommended publications
  • Using TRIZ to Enhance Passengers' Perceptions of an Airline's Image Through Service Quality and Safety
    Journal of Air Transport Management 53 (2016) 131e139 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Air Transport Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jairtraman Using TRIZ to enhance passengers' perceptions of an airline's image through service quality and safety * Thongchai Jeeradist a, Natcha Thawesaengskulthai b, , Thanawan Sangsuwan c a Technopreneurship and Innovation Management, Graduate School, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand b Department of Industrial Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand c Department of Marketing, Faculty of Commerce and Accountancy, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand article info abstract Article history: To improve the impacts of airline image, service quality and safety on passenger perceptions, this paper Received 29 April 2015 examined and presented three case studies to identify the factors that influenced service quality in the Received in revised form airline business, and passenger perceptions of airline image. A literature review on service quality 11 February 2016 measurement (SQM) and airline safety analysed case studies. The quality management framework Accepted 13 February 2016 SERVQUAL with five service quality dimensions including reliability, assurance, tangibility, empathy and Available online xxx responsiveness was used to assess passenger requirements. Selected criteria from airline services and the Kano model measured customer satisfaction. Airline safety criteria were studied and TRIZ techniques Keywords:
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of World Airline Rankings with Different Criteria: Best Airline Ranking and EVAMIX Method Rank
    American Research Journal of Humanities Social Science (ARJHSS)R) 2019 American Research Journal of Humanities Social Science (ARJHSS) E-ISSN: 2378-702X Volume-02, Issue-03, pp-38-46 March-2019 www.arjhss.com Research Paper Open Access Comparison of World Airline Rankings with Different Criteria: Best Airline Ranking and EVAMIX Method Rank Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ozlem Deniz Basar, Istanbul Commerce UniversityDepartment of Statistics Sutluce Mah., Imrahor Cad., No :90, Beyoglu / Istanbul / Turkey Phone : +90-212-444-0413/4613 ABSTRACT:- Competition in the transportation sector is in constant rise as in all sectors today. It is crucial for airlines, which are one of the most important shareholders in the transportation sector, to be recognized and reliable in order to have a place in the market. For this reason, different companies prepare and share a world airline ranking with public each year. These rankings are prepared using different criteria and methodologies. Hence, each of these rankings differs from each other. This study considers the Best Airline Ranking prepared by Airhelp in 2018. The first 15 airlines in this ranking are re-ranked with the EVAMIX method using unused criteria and the results are compared with the Best Airline Ranking. In the conclusion of the study, it is found out that rankings changed significantly; hence, it is greatly important to determine what is desired to measure when the airlines are compared. Keywords: Airline, Ranking, EVAMIX, Critic Method I. INTRODUCTION It is of importance to meet the changing consumer demands, reach and serve more customers in the aviation sector as in all other sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 JACDEC AIRLINE SAFETY RANKING-ENG.Xlsx
    JACDEC SAFETY ANALYSIS www.jacdec.de AIRLINE RISK RANKING 2017 2 ICAO Hull Losses since 1988 No of Serious Risk Index Airline Home Country Begin of Ops # 1 Incidents 2 Code Total No of Hull Non-fatal 3 Fatal 3 2017 Losses 2 1 Emirates UAE Vereinigte Arab. Emirate 1985 1 0 1 27 93,61% 2 Norwegian Air Shuttle NAX Norwegen 1993 0 0 0 6 93,26% 3 Virgin Atlantic Airways VIR Großbritannien 1984 0 0 0 15 92,87% 4 KLM - Royal Dutch Airlines KLM Niederlande 1920 1 0 1 21 92,77% 5 EasyJet EZY Großbritannien 1996 0 0 0 24 92,75% 6 Finnair FIN Finnland 1923 0 0 0 5 92,67% 7 Etihad Airways ETD Vereinigte Arab. Emirate 2003 0 0 0 10 92,56% 8 Spirit Airlines NKS USA 1980 0 0 0 5 92,18% 9 Jetstar Airways JST Australien 2004 0 0 0 9 92,12% 10 Air Arabia ABY Vereinigte Arab. Emirate 2003 0 0 0 2 92,09% 11 Vueling Airlines VLG Spanien 2004 0 0 0 8 92,02% 12 Cathay Pacific Airways CPA Hong Kong, China 1946 0 0 0 10 91,88% 13 EL AL - Israel Airlines ELY Israel 1949 0 0 0 11 91,84% 14 Singapore Airlines SIA Singapur 1972 0 1 1 20 91,78% 15 EVA Air EVA Taiwan 1991 0 0 0 6 91,55% 16 Eurowings EWG Deutschland 1993 0 0 0 8 91,41% 17 jetBlue Airways JBU USA 2000 0 0 0 11 91,40% 18 Capital Airlines CBJ China 1995 0 0 0 0 91,36% 19 Oman Air OMA Oman 1981 0 0 0 2 91,28% 20 Air Canada ACA Kanada 1937 2 0 2 32 91,20% 21 Virgin Australia VOZ Australien 2000 0 0 0 12 91,15% 22 Lufthansa DLH Deutschland 1955 0 1 1 39 90,92% 23 WestJet Airlines WJA Kanada 1996 0 0 0 13 90,91% 24 Air Europa AEA Spanien 1986 0 0 0 11 90,76% 25 QANTAS QFA Australien 1922 0 0 0 25 90,39% 26
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-10-17-Jacdec Analysis Atr + Dhc84
    JACDEC ANALYSIS DHC-8-400 versus ATR-72 JACDEC ANALYSIS 17 OCT 2013 JACDEC ANALYSIS - Quick Datasheet A Safety Comparison between Bombardier DHC-8-400 and ATR-72 Over a period of 15 years (1999 - 2013) Bombardier DHC-8-400 "Dash 8" ATR-72 Role: Regional Turboprop Aircraft Regional Turboprop Aircraft Seat Capacity: 68 - 80 Passengers 68 - 74 Passengers Powerplant: 2x Pratt & Whitney Canada PW150A Turboprop 2x Pratt & Whitney Canada PW127 Turboprop Entry of commercial service: Summer 1999 Q4 1989 (Finnair) Number built (as of OCT 01 2013): 448 651 Number of Hull Losses: 6 15 Number of Serious Incidents: 19 35 Number of on board fatalities: 49 169 Number of on board injured: 17 89 Hull Losses per year (´99 - 2013): 0,40 1,00 Fatalities per year (´99 - 2013): 3,27 11,27 Hull Losses by Airframes (´99 -2013): 0,01 1,36 % 0,02 2,21 % Hull Losses by Region Africa Asia / Pacific 2 33,33 % 6 40,00 % Eurasia 1 16,67 % 1 6,67 % Europe 1 16,67 % 3 20,00 % Latin America 2 13,33 % Mid-East Asia 3 20,00 % North America 2 33,33 % International Territory: © JACDEC Database JACDEC ANALYSIS DHC-8-400 versus ATR-72 JACDEC ANALYSIS SAFETY COMPARISON DHC-8-400 vs. ATR-72 HULL LOSS ACCIDENT DISTRIBUTION MAP 2 = DHC-8-400 accident country = ATR-72 accident country Canada 1x Bangladesh 1x China 1x Cuba 1x Denmark 1x India 2x Lithuania 1x Italy 2x South Korea 1x Laos 1x USA 1x Myanmar 2x Philippines 1x Puerto Rico 1x Poland 1x Russia 1x Taiwan 1x Thailand 1x CURRENT OPERATOR LIST DHC-8-400 ATR-72 Operators Fleet Size Operators Fleet Size Alaska Horizon 48 Azul Linhas Aéreas Brasileiras 26 FlyBE 43 Wings Abadi Air 24 Republic AL 30 TRIP Linhas Aéreas 19 Sunstate AL / QantasLink 30 Jet AW 17 Porter AL 26 UTair Avn 15 Jazz Air 21 FedEx 15 ANA Wings 21 Executive AL / American Eagle 14 SpiceJet 15 Mount Cook AL 14 Austrian 14 Firefly 13 Air Baltic 12 Virgin Australia Regional AL 13 Japan Air Commuter 11 Vietnam AL 12 Wideroe 10 FlyBE Finland 12 Pantheon AW 10 Farnair Switzerland 12 LGW Luftfahrtges.
    [Show full text]
  • Epub Institutional Repository
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elektronische Publikationen der Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien ePubWU Institutional Repository Michael Uher Airport Dubai - Evaluation of Dubai as a First Choice Hub for International Travellers Working Paper Original Citation: Uher, Michael (2005) Airport Dubai - Evaluation of Dubai as a First Choice Hub for International Travellers. Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Transportwirtschaft und Logistik - Verkehr, 03/2005. Institut für Transportwirtschaft und Logistik, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna. This version is available at: http://epub.wu.ac.at/1406/ Available in ePubWU: June 2010 ePubWU, the institutional repository of the WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, is provided by the University Library and the IT-Services. The aim is to enable open access to the scholarly output of the WU. http://epub.wu.ac.at/ Institut für Transportwirtschaft und Logistik Institute of Transport Economics and Logistics Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Transportwirtschaft und Logistik Nr. 3 (2005) Uher, Michael Airport Dubai – Evaluation of Dubai as a First Choice Hub for International Travellers Herausgeber: die Professoren des Instituts für Transportwirtschaft und Logistik Airport Dubai - Evaluation of Dubai as a First Choice Hub for International Travellers Michael Uher Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration Institute of Transport Economics and Logistics
    [Show full text]
  • Finnair-Sustainability-Report-2018-Data
    SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2018 RESPONSIBLE FINNAIR CLEANER CARING COLLABORATIVE ANNEX CONTENT 3 RESPONSIBLE FINNAIR 42 ANNEX 4 Push for Change 43 Reporting principles 6 Value creation model 45 Global Compact content index 7 Materiality analysis 46 GRI content index 9 Management principles 50 Independent practitioner’s limited 16 Ethics and responsible sourcing assurance report 18 CLEANER 20 Energy consumption 23 Flight noise and biodiversity 25 Emissions 27 Waste 28 CARING 29 Caring for our employees 34 Caring for our customers 35 COLLABORATIVE 36 Stakeholders 37 Economic responsibility 39 Tax footprint 2 2 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2018 RESPONSIBLE FINNAIR CLEANER CARING COLLABORATIVE ANNEX RESPONSIBLE FINNAIR Finnair’s objective is to create sustainable economic added value by producing flight services profitably, cost-competitively and in harmony with the needs of the environment and society. • Push for Change • Management Principles • Value Creation model • Ethics and Responsible • Materiality Analysis sourcing 3 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2018 RESPONSIBLE FINNAIR CLEANER CARING COLLABORATIVE ANNEX PUSH FOR CHANGE The same journey can generate more or less emissions, depending on a number of factors. By selecting a sensible form of travel, a direct and lower-emission route as well as an airline that uses modern aircraft, everyone can reduce the environmental impact of their journey. In the name of ethics, companies should not compromise on their travel, but on their emissions. Airlines decide whether to invest in modern technology, recycle waste appropriately, reduce energy consumption, and care Does this ring a bell? Climate change and all years around the world, in aviation, and That is why we must act even more deci- for the wellbeing of employees.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2021 Corporate Finance and ERM — Strategic Decision Making Exam Case Study
    Case Study SPRING 2021 Strategic Decision Making Exam EXAM CFE SDM CFESDM Table of Contents 1 RPPC Dynasty Corporation .................................................................................................................... 2 1A RPPC Dynasty Corporation Exhibits .............................................................................................. 6 2 Blue Jay Air ............................................................................................................................................ 7 2A Blue Jay Air Exhibits .................................................................................................................... 19 3 Blue Jay Tire Co ................................................................................................................................... 33 3A Blue Jay Tire Exhibits ................................................................................................................... 43 4 Frenz Corporation ............................................................................................................................... 47 4A Frenz Corporation Exhibits .......................................................................................................... 56 6 Big Ben Bank ....................................................................................................................................... 63 6A Big Ben Bank Exhibits .................................................................................................................. 73
    [Show full text]
  • Jacdec Safety Ranking 2013
    JACDEC SAFETY RANKING 2013 Ref:http://www.jacdec.de/Airline-Rankings/jacdec_safety_ranking_2013.htm RANKNO AIRLINE CODECS COUNTRY JACDEC SAFETY INDEX 2012 1 AIR NEW ZEALAND NZ, ANZ AUS Index 0,007 2 ↑ 2 CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS CX, CPA HKG Index 0,008 3 ↑ 3 FINNAIR AY, FIN FIN Index 0,010 1 ↓ 4 EMIRATES EK, UAE UAE Index 0,010 4 → 5 EVA AIR BR, EVA TWN Index 0,010 6 ↑ 6 BRITISH AIRWAYS BA, BAW GBR Index 0,011 10 ↑ 7 TAP PORTUGAL TP, TAP PRT Index 0,012 7 → 8 ETIHAD AIRWAYS EY, ETD UAE Index 0,012 5 ↓ 9 AIR CANADA AC, ACA CAN Index 0,012 25 ↑ 10 QANTAS QF, QFA AUS Index 0,013 13 ↑ 11 QATAR AIRWAYS QR, QTR QAT Index 0,013 22 ↑ 12 ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS NH, ANA JPN Index 0,015 12 → 13 VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIRWAYS VS, VIR GBR Index 0,015 15 ↑ 14 HAINAN AIRLINES HU, CHH CHN Index 0,015 8 ↓ 15 VIRGIN AUSTRALIA DJ, VOZ AUS Index 0,015 9 ↓ 16 JETBLUE AIRWAYS B6, JBU USA Index 0,015 14 ↓ 17 KLM KL, KLM NLD Index 0,015 27 ↑ 18 LUFTHANSA LH, DLH DEU Index 0,016 11 ↓ 19 SHENZHEN AIRLINES ZH, CSZ CHN Index 0,018 ★ ↑ 20 EASYJET U2, EZY GBR Index 0,018 17 ↓ 21 THOMAS COOK AIRLINES MT, TCX GBR Index 0,023 18 ↓ 22 WESTJET WS, WJA CAN Index 0,026 19 ↓ 23 TRANSAERO AIRLINES UN, TSO RUS Index 0,027 16 ↓ 24 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES WN, SWA USA Index 0,028 21 ↓ 25 JETSTAR AIRWAYS JQ, JST AUS Index 0,030 20 ↓ 26 AIR BERLIN AB, BER DEU Index 0,034 23 ↓ 27 DELTA AIR LINES DL, DAL USA Index 0,038 28 ↑ 28 THOMSON AIRWAYS BY, TOM GBR Index 0,046 26 ↓ 29 CONDOR DE, CFG DEU Index 0,050 34 ↑ 30 SINGAPORE AIRLINES SQ, SIA SGP Index 0,052 30 → 31 UNITED AIRLINES UA, UAL USA Index 0,057
    [Show full text]
  • The United Arab Emirates Case of Economic Success
    The United Arab Emirates Case of Economic Success The Federal Government Economic Policies Final Work in the form of Internship Report submitted to Universidade Católica Portuguesa for the obtainment of the Master Degree in Management by Pedro Alexandre Azevedo Dias Lima Delgado under orientation of Alexandra Pinto Leitão, PhD Católica Porto Business School July 2016 Acknowledgments I would like to thank Professor Alexandra Pinto Leitão for all the helpful advice, guidance, and invaluable comments on this essay, which have helped me to develop the present Master’s Final Work. iii iv Abstract Within 44 years the United Arab Emirates (UAE) evolved from the backdrop of a subsistence economy into an innovation-driven economy characterized by a high-mass consumption society. Prudent policy-making by the UAE Federal Government was vital in providing proper guidance on the how, where and when to apply hydrocarbon revenues and support the much needed process of economic diversification. Due to its astonishing economic development the UAE has become a role model in economic diversification for oil-producing countries. In this sense, the present Master’s Final Work sheds light on the following research question - “What were the policies adopted by the United Arab Emirates Federal Government that made the Emirates economy a case of success?”. A “two building-block” rationale was adopted in order to address the research question at hand. The first “building-block” allowed us to verify that the UAE is a case of economic success. Within 44 years, the country has now one of the most competitive economies in the world and is at par with most advanced economies in terms business regulations, infrastructure and technological advancement.
    [Show full text]
  • Transpacific Airline Fuel Efficiency Ranking, 2016
    WHITE PAPER JANUARY 2018 TRANSPACIFIC AIRLINE FUEL EFFICIENCY RANKING, 2016 Brandon Graver, Ph.D., and Daniel Rutherford, Ph.D. BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors thank Anastasia Kharina, Naya Olmer, and Joe Schultz for their review and support. We also acknowledge Airline Data Inc. for providing processed BTS data, and to FlightGlobal for Ascend Fleet data. Dimitri Simos provided technical assistance using the Piano model. This study was funded through the generous support of the Bekenstein Foundation. International Council on Clean Transportation 1225 I Street NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005 USA [email protected] | www.theicct.org | @TheICCT © 2018 International Council on Clean Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ iii 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1 2. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Airline Selection ................................................................................................................................2 2.2 Fuel Burn Modeling ..........................................................................................................................4 2.3 Fuel Efficiency Calculation ...........................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Republic of Congo: Arming the East 1
    Previous Democratic Republic of Congo: arming the east 1. Introduction Weapons and munitions have continued to flow into the Great Lakes Region and to those forces known to flagrantly abuse human rights in the eastern DRC despite the peace agreements in 2002 between warring groups of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and between the governments of Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Rwanda and Uganda.(1) The UN Security Council imposed a mandatory arms embargo on the provinces of North and South Kivu and the Ituri region of the eastern DRC, and also on groups not party to the peace agreement in the DRC, on 28 July 2003. This embargo was considerably strengthened and applied to the whole of the DRC, with certain exceptions, on 18 April 2005. Yet, before and after the imposition of the UN embargo, reports of arms and related deliveries continued. International arms flows into the region have corresponded to the clandestine supply of military aid by powerful forces in the DRC, Rwanda, and Uganda to their competing client armed groups and militia in eastern DRC who practise banditry and show little or no respect for human rights. Although fighting has subsided since the peace agreements, there have been regular clashes in which civilians have been brutally targeted. The military situation remains tense and civilians still live in fear and continue to be frequently exposed to large-scale human rights abuses. The current shortcomings in the demobilisation process, the easy availability of small arms, and the recent arming of "self defence" militia have also lead to a rapid rise in armed banditry.
    [Show full text]
  • A US Army War College Analysis of Russian Strategy in Eastern Europe, an Appropriate US Response, and the Implications for US La
    The United States Army War College The United States Army War College educates and develops leaders for service at the strategic level while advancing knowledge in the global application of Landpower. The purpose of the United States Army War College is to produce graduates who are skilled critical thinkers and complex problem solvers. Concurrently, it is our duty to the U.S. Army to also act as a “think factory” for commanders and civilian leaders at the strategic level worldwide and routinely engage in discourse and debate concerning the role of ground forces in achieving national security objectives. Project 1704 and is produced under the purview of the United States Army War College to foster dialogue of topics with strategic ramifications. This study drew upon the expertise of hand selected U.S. Army War College faculty and students from across the services, departments, agencies and from eight nations to provide a thought-provoking and relevant discourse of a topic of timely relevance; the reemergence of Russian strategic landpower. Disclaimer The ideas and viewpoints advanced in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the institution, the Department of Defense, or any other department or agency of the United States Government. Cover Photo courtesy of Sgt Rupert Frere RLC/MOD [OGL (http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/1/)], via Wikimedia Commons US Army War College Contributors and Authors: Project leader: COL Douglas Mastriano, PhD, US Army War College Faculty Editor: Lt Col Derek O’Malley, USAF Chapter 1: The Russian Strategic Environment Dr.
    [Show full text]