DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2009 COMMISSION EUROPEAN Annual Report 2009 Report Annual Market Transport Air European the of Analyses Annual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2009 COMMISSION EUROPEAN Annual Report 2009 Report Annual Market Transport Air European the of Analyses Annual Annual Report 2009 Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2009 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Air Transport and Airport Research Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2009 German Aerospace Center Deutsches Zentrum German Aerospace für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. Center in the Helmholtz-Association Institute of Air Transport and Airport Research February 2011 Linder Hoehe 51147 Cologne Germany Head: Prof. Dr. Johannes Reichmuth Authors: Erik Grunewald, Amir Ayazkhani, Dr. Peter Berster, Gregor Bischoff, Prof. Dr. Hansjochen Ehmer, Dr. Marc Gelhausen, Wolfgang Grimme, Michael Hepting, Hermann Keimel, Rainer Kiehne, Alexandra Leipold, Dr. Sven Maertens, Melanie Murphy, Dr. Peter Meincke, Dr. Janina Scheelhaase web: http://www.dlr.de/fw Final Report 2011-02-15 Release: 1.8 Page 1 Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2009 Document Control Information Responsible project manager: DG MOVE Project task: Annual analyses of the European air transport market 2009 EC contract number: TREN/05/MD/S07.74176 Release: 1.8 Save date: 2011-02-15 Total pages: 203 Change Log Release Date Changed Pages or Chapters Comments 0.1 2010-01-21 0.2 2010-04-15 0.21 2010-04-23 1st Draft Report 2009 0.3 2010-07-26 Final Draft Report 2009 0.31 2010-09-02 0.32 2010-09-08 0.33 2010-09-20 corrections after review 0.34 2010-10-21 Final Report 2009 - Draft 1.0 2010-10-28 final language check Final Report 2009 1.1 2010-10-29 internal 1.2 2010-12-10 internal 1.3 2010-12-13 internal 1.4 2010-12-20 Final Report 2009 1.5 2011-01-21 1, 2 Final Report 2009 1.6 2011-01-27 1 Final Report 2009 1.7 2011-01-28 Summary detail Final Report 2009 1.8 2011-02-15 Disclaimer Final Report 2009 Disclaimer and copyright: This report has been carried out for the Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport in the European Commission and expresses the opinion of the organisation undertaking the contract TREN/05/MD/S07.74176. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the European Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the European Commission's or the Mobility and Transport DG's views. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the information given in the report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. Copyright in this report is held by the European Communities. Persons wishing to use the contents of this report (in whole or in part) for purposes other than their personal use are invited to submit a written request to the following address: European Commission - DG MOVE - Library (DM28, 0/36) - B-1049 Brussels e-mail (http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/transport/contact/index_en.htm) 2011-02-15 Final Report Page 2 Release: 1.8 Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2009 Content Summary...................................................................................................................................6 1 Air traffic........................................................................................................................15 1.1 Global passenger and freight volume.........................................................................15 1.1.1 Global passenger volume..................................................................................15 1.1.2 Passenger traffic in the world regions ...............................................................17 1.1.3 Global freight volume.......................................................................................17 1.1.4 Comparison of freight tonne kilometres of Europe and the other world regions ...................................................................................................19 1.2 Air traffic in EU-27.....................................................................................................19 1.2.1 European passenger traffic ...............................................................................19 1.2.2 Passenger traffic flows between EU Member States ..........................................20 1.2.3 Passenger traffic flows between the EU-27 and other world regions .................21 1.2.4 European air freight traffic volume ...................................................................22 1.2.5 Freight traffic flows between EU-27 Member States .........................................23 1.2.6 Freight traffic flows between the EU-27 and other world regions......................24 1.3 Air traffic in EU Member States..................................................................................26 1.3.1 Passenger volume.............................................................................................26 1.3.2 Freight volume .................................................................................................27 1.3.3 Flight volumes in the European countries..........................................................28 1.4 General Aviation........................................................................................................31 2 Airlines...........................................................................................................................44 2.1 Passenger airlines.......................................................................................................44 2.1.1 Worldwide scheduled departures......................................................................44 2.1.2 European departures and routes.......................................................................45 2.1.3 Supply by airline type........................................................................................47 2.1.4 Air transport demand .......................................................................................56 2.1.5 Passenger aircraft fleet .....................................................................................76 2.1.6 Airline financial performance ............................................................................83 2.1.7 Alliances...........................................................................................................92 2.1.8 Competition ...................................................................................................101 2.2 Cargo Airlines..........................................................................................................107 2.2.1 Cargo Airlines – Supply...................................................................................107 2.2.2 Cargo Fleet.....................................................................................................113 2.2.3 Cargo Airlines - Financial Performance............................................................116 3 Airports........................................................................................................................117 3.1 Passengers...............................................................................................................117 3.2 Aircraft Movements .................................................................................................120 3.3 Freight.....................................................................................................................123 Final Report 2011-02-15 Release: 1.8 Page 3 Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2009 4 Air transport forecasts ..................................................................................................127 4.1 Global forecasts.......................................................................................................127 4.2 European forecasts ..................................................................................................129 4.2.1 Eurocontrol short-term forecast December 2009 ............................................129 4.2.2 Eurocontrol medium-term forecast 2009-2015 ...............................................130 5 Regulatory Developments.............................................................................................132 5.1 International Aviation ..............................................................................................132 5.1.1 Horizontal Agreements...................................................................................132 5.1.2 Bilateral Agreements ......................................................................................133 5.1.3 Common Aviation Area with the EU’s Neighbours ..........................................133 5.1.4 Global Agreements.........................................................................................133 5.1.5 International Cooperation...............................................................................137 5.2 Competition ............................................................................................................137 5.2.1 State aid.........................................................................................................137 5.2.2 Mergers..........................................................................................................139 5.2.3 Antitrust.........................................................................................................140 5.2.4 Infringements .................................................................................................140 5.3 Distribution Networks (CRS).....................................................................................141 5.4 SES II .......................................................................................................................142
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cathay Pacific Airways Fact Sheet
    CATHAY PACIFIC FACT SHEET Cathay Pacific Airways is a Hong Kong-based airline offering scheduled passenger and cargo services to nearly 200 destinations in Asia, North America, Australia, Europe and Africa, using a fleet of more than 140 wide-body aircraft. The company is a member of the Swire group and is a public company listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Cathay Dragon is a wholly owned subsidiary of Cathay Pacific, and the airline also has a 60% stake in AHK Air Hong Kong Ltd, an all- cargo carrier operating regional express freight services. Cathay Pacific has made substantial investments to develop Hong Kong as one of the world's leading global transportation hubs. The airline is a founder member of the oneworld global alliance. Cathay Pacific was named “World’s Best Airline” four times in the Skytrax World Airline Awards. SENIOR MANAGEMENT Chairman John Slosar Chief Executive Officer Rupert Hogg Chief Customer and Commercial Officer Paul Loo Chief Operations and Service Delivery Officer Greg Hughes Chief Financial Officer Martin Murray Director People Tom Owen Director Service Delivery (and CEO Cathay Dragon) Algernon Yau Director Flight Operations Anna Thompson Director Customer Simon Large Director Commercial and Cargo Ronald Lam Director Engineering Neil Glenn FLEET SUMMARY Aircraft inventory: 146 Firm orders: 50 Average age of aircraft: 7.7 years Passenger Boeing 777-200 5 Airbus A350-900 9 aircraft Boeing 777-300 12 Airbus A350-1000 20 Boeing 777-300ER 53 Boeing 777-9X 21 Airbus A330-300 37 Airbus A350-900 19 Freighters Boeing 747-400ERF 6 Boeing 747-8F 14 Corporate Affairs Department 1 1 October 2017 NUMBER OF PEOPLE Cathay Pacific and Cathay Dragon employ 18,500 people in Hong Kong, making the company one of Hong Kong's biggest employers.
    [Show full text]
  • Clovis Municipal Airport
    Clovis Municipal Airport BAirportigBear MasterCityAi Planrport Master Plan Planning Services BigBearCityAirport Master Plan Planning Services Prepared by: In association with AIRPORT MASTER PLAN for Clovis Municipal Airport Clovis, New Mexico Prepared for City of Clovis, New Mexico by KSA, Inc. in association with CDM Smith, Inc. DRAFT FINAL September 2015 The preparation of this document was financially support, in part, through a grant provided by the New Mexico Department of Transportation. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the NMDOT or Federal Aviation Administration. Acceptance of this report by the NMDOT or FAA does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the State of New Mexico or United States to participate in any development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable or would have justification in accordance with appropriate public laws. PLAN Table of Contents Chapter One: Inventory of Existing Conditions 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Overview of the Airport .......................................................................... 1-2 1.2.1 CVN Location .................................................................................1-2 1.2.2 CVN Sponsor Management ..............................................................1-4 1.2.3 CVN History ....................................................................................1-5
    [Show full text]
  • List of Representations and Evidence Received
    CAP 1134 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received APPENDIX A List of representations and evidence received Responses submitted in response to the Gatwick: Market Power Assessment, the CAA’s Initial Views – February 20121 . David Starkie, regulatory and competition economist . Gatwick Airport Limited (GAL) . Virgin Atlantic Airways (VAA) Responses submitted in response to the Consultation on Gatwick Market Power Assessment (CAP 1052)2 . British Airways (BA) . easyJet . GAL . Gatwick Airport Consultative Committee . VAA Stakeholder meetings / teleconference held3 Airlines . Aer Lingus . Air Asia X . Air Berlin . Air Malta . Aurigny 1 Non-confidential versions of these submissions are available on the CAA's website. 2 Non-confidential versions of these submissions are available on the CAA's website. 3 Included in this are airlines that met the CAA Board as part of the consultation process. 1 CAP 1134 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received . BA . bmi regional . Cathay Pacific . Delta . easyJet . Emirates . Flybe . Jet2 . Lufthansa . Monarch . Norwegian Air Shuttle . Ryanair . Thomas Cook . TUI Travel . VAA . Wizz Air Airport operators: . Birmingham Airport Holdings Limited . East Midlands International Airport Limited . Gatwick Airport Limited . Heathrow Airport Limited . London Luton Airport Operations Limited . London Southend Airport Company Limited . Manchester Airports Group PLC . Stansted Airport Limited 2 CAP 1134 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received Cargo carriers . British Airways World Cargo . bmi Cargo . DHL . Emirates Sky Cargo . FedEx . Royal Mail . TNT Express Services . [] Other stakeholders . Agility Logistics . Airport Coordination Limited UK . Gatwick Airport Consultative Committee . Stop Stansted Expansion Information gathered under statutory powers (section 73 Airports Act 1986 / section 50 Civil Aviation Act 2012) .
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: List of Representations and Evidence Received
    CAP 1133 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received APPENDIX A List of representations and evidence received Responses submitted in response to the Heathrow: Market Power Assessment, the CAA’s Initial Views – February 20121 . David Starkie, regulatory and competition economist . Heathrow Airport Limited (HAL) . Virgin Atlantic Airways (VAA) Responses submitted in response to the Consultation on Heathrow Market Power Assessment (CAP 1051)2 . HAL . London Airlines Consultative Committee & Heathrow Airline Operators Committee . VAA Stakeholder meetings / teleconference held3 Airlines . Aer Lingus . Air Asia X . Air Berlin . Air Malta . Aurigny 1 Non-confidential versions of these submissions are available on the CAA's website: http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?catid=78&pagetype=90&pageid=12275. 2 Non-confidential versions of these submissions are available on the CAA's website. 3 Included in this are airlines that met the CAA Board as part of the consultation process. 1 CAP 1133 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received . British Airways . bmi regional . Cathay Pacific . Delta . easyJet . Emirates . Flybe . Jet2 . Lufthansa . Monarch . Norwegian Air Shuttle . Ryanair . Thomas Cook . TUI Travel . VAA . Wizz Air Airport operators: . Birmingham Airport Holdings Limited . East Midlands International Airport Limited . Gatwick Airport Limited . Heathrow Airport Limited . London Luton Airport Operations Limited . London Southend Airport Company Limited . Manchester Airports Group . Stansted Airport Limited 2 CAP 1133 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received Cargo carriers . British Airways World Cargo . bmi Cargo . DHL . Emirates Sky Cargo . FedEx . IAG Cargo . Royal Mail . Titan Airways . TNT Express Services . Other stakeholders . Agility Logistics . Airport Coordination Limited UK . Gatwick Airport Consultative Committee .
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Determinants for Seat Capacity Distribution in EU and US, 1990-2009
    Determinants for seat capacity distribution in EU and US, 1990-2009. Pere SUAU-SANCHEZ*1; Guillaume BURGHOUWT 2; Xavier FAGEDA 3 1Department of Geography, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Edifici B – Campus de la UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain E-mail: [email protected] 2Airneth, SEO Economic Research, Roetersstraat 29, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Economic Policy, Universitat de Barcelona, Av.Diagonal 690, 08034 Barcelona, Spain E-mail: [email protected] *Correspondance to: Pere SUAU-SANCHEZ Department of Geography, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Edifici B – Campus de la UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain E-mail: [email protected] Telephone: +34 935814805 Fax: +34 935812100 1 Determinants for seat capacity distribution in EU and US, 1990-2009. Abstract Keywords: 2 1. Introduction Air traffic is one of the factors influencing and, at the same time, showing the position of a city in the world-city hierarchy. There is a positive correlation between higher volumes of air passenger and cargo flows, urban growth and the position in the urban hierarchy of the knowledge economy (Goetz, 1992; Rodrigue, 2004; Taylor, 2004; Derudder and Witlox, 2005, 2008; Bel and Fageda, 2008). In relation to the configuration of mega-city regions, Hall (2009) remarks that it is key to understand how information moves in order to achieve face-to-face communication and, over long distances, it will continue to move by air, through the big international airports (Shin and Timberlake, 2000). This paper deals with the allocation of seat capacity among all EU and US airports over a period of 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007
    EU_ENTWURF_08:00_ENTWURF_01 01.04.2026 13:07 Uhr Seite 1 Analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 EUROPEAN COMMISSION EU_ENTWURF_08:00_ENTWURF_01 01.04.2026 13:07 Uhr Seite 2 Air Transport and Airport Research Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 German Aerospace Center Deutsches Zentrum German Aerospace für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. Center in the Helmholtz-Association Air Transport and Airport Research June 2008 Porz-Wahnheide Linder Höhe 51147 Köln Germany Head: Prof. Dr. Johannes Reichmuth web: http://www.dlr.de/fw Annual Report 2007 2008-06-20 Release: 1.2 Page 1 Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 Document Control Information Responsible project manager: DG Energy and Transport Project task: Annual analyses of the European air transport market 2007 EC contract number: TREN/05/MD/S07.74176 Release: 1.2 Save date: 2008-06-20 Total pages: 224 Change Log Release Date Changed Pages or Chapters Comments 1.0 2008-06-06 Final Report (Annual 2007) 1.1 2008-06-09 chapter 2.1.7 PSO data update 1.2 2008-06-16 layout items 2.0 Sept 2008 full year 2007 update expected in September 2008 Disclaimer and copyright: This report has been carried out for the Directorate-General for Energy and Transport in the European Commission and expresses the opinion of the organisation undertaking the contract TREN/05/MD/S07.74176. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the European Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the European Commission's or the Transport and Energy DG's views.
    [Show full text]
  • Recull De Premsa
    5 Recull de Premsa Dimecres, 14 De Gener De 2015 6 3 4 EL PUNT AVUI DIMECRES, 14 DE GENER DEL 2015 GIRONÈS | Comarques Gironines | 37 Tolosa, Palma, Eivissa i Lisboa. L’estrena de l’aero- port pirinenc, però, es va Air Andorra oferirà el vol endarrerir fins al 8 de ge- ner i de moment Air An- dorra –l’única companyia comercial que hi havia mostrat interès– no hi Girona-Madrid abans de març opera. La companyia aèria es queixa dels successius a La companyia, de nova creació, explica que ha decidit centrar la seva estratègia en aquesta ruta i retards de l’obertura –“al a juliol estàvem a punt i vam ajornar els seus plans a l’aeroport de la Seu El vol serà diari i s’efectuarà en un avió de 74 places haver de paralitzar-ho tot”–i sobretot denuncien que l’adjudicació del servei Lurdes Artigas GIRONA de handling (assistència a terra) s’ha fet només per L’ajornament del llança- sis mesos i, asseguren, ment d’Air Andorra a l’ae- sense concurs públic. “Ai- roport de la Seu –on vol es- xò no ens dóna garanties tablir la seva principal ba- de continuïtat ni tampoc se d’operacions– podia ha- seguretat, ja que creiem ver fet témer que l’anun- que alguna empresa pot ciat vol diari Girona-Ma- impugnar la designació”, drid d’aquesta companyia assenyalen. És per això de nova creació corria pe- que, mentre estudien què rill. Des de la companyia fer a la Seu, han prioritzat aèria, però, afirmen just el l’arrancada del Girona- contrari.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19) on Civil Aviation: Economic Impact Analysis
    Effects of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) on Civil Aviation: Economic Impact Analysis Montréal, Canada 11 March 2020 Contents • Introduction and Background • Scenario Analysis: Mainland China • Scenario Analysis: Hong Kong SAR of China and Macao SAR of China • Summary of Scenario Analysis and Additional Estimates: China • Scenario Analysis: Republic of Korea • Scenario Analysis: Italy • Scenario Analysis: Iran (Islamic Republic of) • Preliminary Analysis: Japan and Singapore 2 Estimated impact on 4 States with the highest number of confirmed cases* Estimated impact of COVID-19 outbreak on scheduled international passenger traffic during 1Q 2020 compared to originally-planned: • China (including Hong Kong/Macao SARs): 42 to 43% seat capacity reduction, 24.8 to 28.1 million passenger reduction, USD 6.0 to 6.9 billion loss of gross operating revenues of airlines • Republic of Korea: 27% seat capacity reduction, 6.1 to 6.6 million passenger reduction, USD 1.3 to 1.4 billion loss of gross operating revenues of airlines • Italy: 19% seat capacity reduction, 4.8 to 5.4 million passenger reduction, USD 0.6 to 0.7 billion loss of gross operating revenues of airlines • Iran (Islamic Republic of): 25% seat capacity reduction, 580,000 to 630,000 passenger reduction, USD 92 to 100 million loss of gross operating revenues of airlines * Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report by WHO 3 Global capacity share of 4 States dropped from 23% in January to 9% in March 2020 • Number of seats offer by airlines for scheduled international passenger traffic;
    [Show full text]
  • European Air Law Association 23Rd Annual Conference Palazzo Spada Piazza Capo Di Ferro 13, Rome
    European Air Law Association 23rd Annual Conference Palazzo Spada Piazza Capo di Ferro 13, Rome “Airline bankruptcy, focus on passenger rights” Laura Pierallini Studio Legale Pierallini e Associati, Rome LUISS University of Rome, Rome Rome, 4th November 2011 Airline bankruptcy, focus on passenger rights Laura Pierallini Air transport and insolvencies of air carriers: an introduction According to a Study carried out in 2011 by Steer Davies Gleave for the European Commission (entitled Impact assessment of passenger protection in the event of airline insolvency), between 2000 and 2010 there were 96 insolvencies of European airlines operating scheduled services. Of these insolvencies, some were of small airlines, but some were of larger scheduled airlines and caused significant issues for passengers (Air Madrid, SkyEurope and Sterling). Airline bankruptcy, focus on passenger rights Laura Pierallini The Italian market This trend has significantly affected the Italian market, where over the last eight years, a number of domestic air carriers have experienced insolvencies: ¾Minerva Airlines ¾Gandalf Airlines ¾Alpi Eagles ¾Volare Airlines ¾Air Europe ¾Alitalia ¾Myair ¾Livingston An overall, since 2003 the Italian air transport market has witnessed one insolvency per year. Airline bankruptcy, focus on passenger rights Laura Pierallini The Italian Air Transport sector and the Italian bankruptcy legal framework. ¾A remedy like Chapter 11 in force in the US legal system does not exist in Italy, where since 1979 special bankruptcy procedures (Amministrazione Straordinaria) have been introduced to face the insolvency of large enterprises (Law. No. 95/1979, s.c. Prodi Law, Legislative Decree No. 270/1999, s.c. Prodi-bis, Law Decree No. 347/2003 enacted into Law No.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong-Kong-China.Pdf
    APEC Project: TWG 01 2014A Produced by International Air Transport Association Head Office Canada: 800 Place Victoria, PO Box 113 Montreal H4Z 1M1, Quebec, Canada www.iata.org/consulting For Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat 35 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119616 Tel: (65) 68919 600 Fax: (65) 68919 690 Email: [email protected] Website: www.apec.org © 2016 APEC Secretariat APEC#216-TO-01.9 Table of Contents Glossary ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..5 List of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction to the project ......................................................................................................... 10 2. Approach followed and data used .............................................................................................. 11 2.1 Data fueling the model ............................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Gap analysis ................................................................................................................................ 12 2.3 Induction ..................................................................................................................................... 13 2.4 Connecting potential .................................................................................................................. 14 2.5 Demand growth .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wet Leasing (ACMI) First Supreme Court Ruling on a Consequential Damages Waiver
    Wet leasing (ACMI) First supreme court ruling on a consequential damages waiver Ángel Carrasco Perera Professor of Civil Law, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha Academic counsel, Gómez-Acebo & Pombo This judgment is interesting because it resolves at least one doubt: the validity of the consequential damages waiver clause in commercial contracts. 1. The wet lease agreement and the Barajas accident Iberworld Airlines filed a claim against Mapfre, seeking a determination of liability of Aena and Air Comet and, consequently, of Mapfre, as insurer of both, for the purposes of receiving compensation for damage sustained by the Airbus A330 MSN 0670 aircraft on 28 May 2008 at Barajas airport. The aforementioned airlines had entered into a wet lease agreement under which Iberworld Airlines would provide a duly equipped aircraft to carry out the commercial passenger flights agreed thereunder. "Neither party shall be liable for loss of use or consequential damage arising out of the aforementioned or other services under this Agreement". Disclaimer: This paper is provided for general information purposes only and nothing expressed herein should be construed as legal advice or recommendation. Analysis | March 2021 1 A collision occurred at Barajas airport in which the Airbus was damaged during a taxiing ma- noeuvre of the aforementioned aircraft from its parking space in the satellite building of Terminal 4 to Terminal 1 for a flight operated by Air Comet. According to the claim filed by Iberworld, an Aena Follow Me, which was guiding the convoy, did not respect a waiting point (stop) on the A-11 section of the road parallel to runway 33 and the airport's Surface Movement Control did not manage the movement correctly either; this caused the aircraft to brake abruptly to make way for a Vueling aircraft, which was travelling on the preferential runway.
    [Show full text]
  • Check-In Am Bahnhof Und Fly Rail Baggage
    1/8 Check-in am Bahnhof via Zürich und Genève Check-in à la gare via Zürich et Genève Check-in alla stazione via Zürich e Genève Check-in at the railstation via Zürich and Genève Version: 26. Januar 2011 Legend HA = Handlingagent SP = Swissport, DN = Dnata Switzerland AG, AS = Airline Assistance Switzerland AG, EH = Own Handling R = Reason T = Technical, S = Security, O = Other reason WT = Weight Tolerance Y = Economy-Class, C = Business-Class, F = First-Class * = Agent Informations Infoportal/Airlines Check-in ok Restrictions Airline, Code Check-in Einschränkungen/Restrictions WT HA R Y = 2 Adria Airways JP ok SP C = 3 Aegean Airlines A3 ok 2 SP Aer Lingus EI no SP O Aeroflot Russian Airlines SU no SP S Aerolineas Argentinas AR ok 2 SP African Safari Airways ASA ok 2 DN Afriqiyah Airways 8U no DN O Air Algérie* AH ok No boardingpass 0 SP Air Baltic BT no SP T Not for USA, Canada, Pristina, Russia, Air Berlin* AB ok Cyprus; 0 DN not possible for groups 11+ Air Cairo MSC ok 2 SP AC 6821 / 6822 / 6826 / 6829 / 6832 / Air Canada AC no SP T =ok Air Dolomiti EN ok 2 SP Air Europa AEA / UX ok 2 DN Not from Zürich; not for USA, Canada, AF ok* 2 SP T Air France* Mexico; no boardingpass Air India AI ok 2 SP Air Italy I9 ok 2 DN Air Mali XG no SP O Air Malta KM ok 3 SP Y = 7 Air Mauritius MK ok Not from Zurich SP C = 10 Air Mediteranée BIE ok 2 DN Air New Zealand NZ ok 2 SP Air One AP ok 2 SP Air Seychelles HM ok Not from Zurich 3 SP Air Transat TS ok 2 SP Alitalia AZ no SP/DN T American Airlines AA no SP T ANA All Nippon Airways NH ok 2 SP Armavia
    [Show full text]