DOCSLIB.ORG

Phd Dissertation Lucie Enochsson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phd Dissertation Lucie Enochsson The Sharing Economy in Cities Institutionalisation and Sustainability Enochsson, Lucie 2021 Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Enochsson, L. (2021). The Sharing Economy in Cities: Institutionalisation and Sustainability. (2021:3 ed.). IIIEE, Lund University. Total number of authors: 1 Creative Commons License: Unspecified General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 LUCIE ENOCHSSON AN ECOLABEL 3041 0903 NORDIC SW The Sharing in CitiesEconomy ryck, Lund 2021 The Sharing Economy in Cities Institutionalisation and Sustainability LUCIE ENOCHSSON | IIIEE | LUND UNIVERSITY Printed by Media-T The Sharing Economy in Cities Cities are facing many sustainability challenges, including climate change, lack of affordable housing, or socio-eco- nomic inequality. By proposing a novel way of redistributing resources, the sharing economy has a potential to solve these problems. Or does it? This study shows that the sustainability impacts of the sharing economy have become a contested issue and play a major role in the development of sharing practices in urban areas. It centres around two key actor groups, urban sharing organisations and municipal governments, when it explores how the sharing economy becomes institutionalised in cities. 357732 IIIEE Dissertations 2021:3 2021:3 ISBN 978-91-87357-73-2 789187 ISSN 1402-3016 9 The Sharing Economy in Cities Institutionalisation and Sustainability Lucie Enochsson DOCTORAL THESIS by due permission of the Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Sweden. To be defended at the International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University; Sweden, 18th June 2021, 13:15. Faculty opponent Professor Christina Öberg Örebro University, Sweden i Organization Document name LUND UNIVERSITY DOCTORAL DISSERTATION Date of issue 24th MAY 2021 Author LUCIE ENOCHSSON Sponsoring organization N/A Title and subtitle The Sharing Economy in Cities: Institutionalisation and Sustainability Abstract The sharing economy is a novel way of distributing physical resources facilitated by online platforms where temporary access is given to goods owned by peers or organisations. It has become prominent in urban areas where a large accumulation of resources in close proximity and the ubiquity of information and communications technology enable it to grow. Its emergence has had various impacts on existing urban systems that are essential for the well-functioning of cities. There is therefore value in exploring its institutionalisation in specific urban contexts. This PhD dissertation aims to advance understanding on (i) how two key actor groups, urban sharing organisations and municipal governments, work to shape the development of the sharing economy in cities, and (ii) which sustainability claims they use to shape this process. The study draws on 150 interviews with key sharing economy actors collected during mobile research labs in six cities: London, Berlin, Amsterdam, Malmö, San Francisco, and Toronto. The research gaps are further assessed by combining four theoretical angles: institutional work, governance theory, framing theory, and sustainability science. It was found that urban sharing organisations engage in both institutional creation and disruption when attempting to institutionalise sharing practices in cities. These modes of institutional work vary among the different organisations, and impact which sharing practices become institutionalised and which existing institutions become disrupted. As a response to the emergence of the sharing economy in cities, municipal governments have developed a portfolio of governance mechanisms. When they steer the development of urban sharing organisations, they engage in outward governance. When they define who they are in relation to the sharing economy, and direct their efforts towards their own actions, it is referred to as inward governance. Often, urban sharing organisations and municipal governments use sustainability framings to co-create the sharing economy in cities. These framings are also explored in this thesis. The study underlines that the diversity of sharing economy business models, existing institutional arrangements in cities, urban sustainability issues, and institutional work of key actors are some of the key factors influencing institutionalisation of the sharing economy in cities. These factors also determine how the sharing economy will impact urban sustainability in the future. Key words sharing economy, urban sharing, platforms, institutional work, sustainability, governance Classification system and/or index terms (if any) Supplementary bibliographical information Language English ISSN and key title ISBN 1402-3016 IIIEE Dissertation 2021:03 978-91-87357-72-5 (digital) 978-91-87357-73-2 (print) Recipient’s notes Number of pages 90 Price Security classification I, the undersigned, being the copyright owner of the abstract of the above-mentioned thesis, hereby grant to all reference sources permission to publish and disseminate the abstract of the above-mentioned thesis. Signature Date 2021-05-03 ii The Sharing Economy in Cities Institutionalisation and sustainability Lucie Enochsson iii Cover photo by Copyright pp 1-90 Lucie Enochsson Paper 1 © Elsevier doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.057 Paper 2 © Taylor & Francis doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2018.1463978 Paper 3 © Edward Elgar Publishing doi.org/10.4337/9781788110549.00030 Paper 4 © Elsevier doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.12.002 Paper 5 © MDPI doi.org/10.3390/su13084213 International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics ISBN 978-91-87357-72-5 (digital) 978-91-87357-73-2 (print) ISSN 1402-3016 Printed in Sweden by Media-Tryck, Lund University Lund 2021 iv In loving memory of those who left us during the course of my PhD My amazing, tree-climbing landlady Elsa and Mitt änglabarn Amelia v Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... ix Abstract ................................................................................................................ xii Popular science summary .................................................................................. xiii List of peer reviewed publications ...................................................................... xv Contribution to papers ....................................................................................... xvi Other publications ............................................................................................. xvii Abbreviations ...................................................................................................... xix Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 Defining the sharing economy ....................................................................... 2 Sustainability potentials and impacts on cities ............................................... 5 Problem definition and knowledge gaps ........................................................ 7 Institutional work of urban sharing organisations ................................. 9 Institutional work of municipalities ..................................................... 10 Role of sustainability in institutionalising the sharing economy ......... 10 Objective and research questions ................................................................. 12 Research scope and limitations .................................................................... 14 Sharing economy ................................................................................. 14 Geographical boundaries ..................................................................... 16 Actors .................................................................................................. 20 Research process and overview of papers .................................................... 21 Paper I .................................................................................................. 22 Paper II ................................................................................................ 23 Paper III ............................................................................................... 23 Paper IV ............................................................................................... 23 Paper V ................................................................................................ 24 Target audience ...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sharing Economy Has Been Revealed As a Valuable Tool
    As the Let’s Talk Trash team has been investigating how to move Powell River closer to Zero Waste, the Sharing Economy has been revealed as a valuable tool. Here are a few local Sharing Economy resources we can all tap into. The Sharing Economy (Collaborative Consumption): • is a socio-economic system built around the sharing of human and physical resources. • provides expanded access to products, services and talent beyond initial face to face exchanges. Ex: Craigslist, Ebay • includes the shared creation, production, distribution, trade and consumption of goods and services by people and organizations. • can involve sharing access to products or services, rather than having individual ownership. Ex: Tool Library, Car Sharing • encompasses for-profit, non-profit, barter and co-operative structures. • is based on a set of values that includes trust, transparency, economic empowerment, creative expression, authenticity, community resilience and human connection. • is available to corporations, governments and individuals willing to actively participate as buyers, sellers, lenders or borrowers in these varied and evolving organizational structures. Accommodation Sharing Couch Surfing: Connects travelers. Members can find a place to stay or share their home with other travelers. Hosting and couch surfing are FREE. Hosts and guests have profiles to ensure safety and respectful treatment of the spaces. https://www.couchsurfing.com/ Air B’n B: Cheaper than a hotel or house rental, and more unique. There are rooms and homes available in 190+ countries. Hosts and guests have profiles to ensure safety and respectful treatment of the spaces. Sign up for free and offer or book a space. https://www.airbnb.ca/ Home Exchange: Exchange homes with other users in 150 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • AUTHENTICATION TECHNIQUES for HETEROGENEOUS TELEPHONE NETWORKS by BRADLEY GALLOWAY REAVES a DISSERTATION PRESENTED to the GRADUA
    AUTHENTICATION TECHNIQUES FOR HETEROGENEOUS TELEPHONE NETWORKS By BRADLEY GALLOWAY REAVES A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2017 © 2017 Bradley Galloway Reaves For Sarah ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Iamonlywritingthistodaybecauseofthemultitudeoffamily,friends,teachers,and colleagues who helped get me here. This journey began in high school, when Mrs. Reid, my English teacher, suggested that I would make a good college professor. I wasn’t sure about the idea until my second programming class in college. I loved programming, so I would do the lab assignments at home, then show up in the lab to demonstrate the project to the TA. My work for the week was done, but I didn’t leave the lab. Instead, I stayed for the next few hours helping other students when they needed help with the programming assignments. It became the best part of my week, and I realized that there was no career I wanted more than to be a professor of computing. Having a goal and knowing what it takes to achieve it are two very di↵erent things. At the time I knew I needed a PhD, but nothing of what it took to get one. Luckily, I had wonderfully supportive professors and advisors who told me what it took, and one in particular helped me take the first steps toward a research career. Tommy Morris was a new professor at Mississippi State, and after teaching my digital design class o↵ered me a (paid!) position in his research lab.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborative Consumption: Sharing Our Way Towards Sustainability?
    COLLABORATIVE CONSUMPTION: SHARING OUR WAY TOWARDS SUSTAINABILITY? by SAMUEL COUTURE-BRIÈRE A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Political Science) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) December 2014 © Samuel Couture-Brière, 2014 ABSTRACT Collaborative consumption (CC) refers to activities surrounding the sharing, swapping, or trading of goods and services within a collaborative consumption community. First, this MA thesis evaluates the factors contributing to the rapid increase of CC initiatives. These factors include technology, personal economics, environmental concerns, and social interaction. Second, the thesis explores the prospects and limits of CC in terms of sustainability. The most promising prospect is that CC seems to generate social capital and initiate a value shift away from ownership. However, institutional forces promoting growth limit this potential. The thesis concludes that CC itself is not enough to achieve sustainability, and therefore, more political solutions are needed. The paper ends with a critical discussion on the future of our growth-based economic model by suggesting that certain forms of CC could represent the roots of a “post- growth” economy. ii PREFACE This thesis is original, unpublished, independent work by the author, S. Couture-Brière. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Sharing Economy: Disrupting the Business and Legal Landscape
    THE SHARING ECONOMY: DISRUPTING THE BUSINESS AND LEGAL LANDSCAPE Panel 402 NAPABA Annual Conference Saturday, November 5, 2016 9:15 a.m. 1. Program Description Tech companies are revolutionizing the economy by creating marketplaces that connect individuals who “share” their services with consumers who want those services. This “sharing economy” is changing the way Americans rent housing (Airbnb), commute (Lyft, Uber), and contract for personal services (Thumbtack, Taskrabbit). For every billion-dollar unicorn, there are hundreds more startups hoping to become the “next big thing,” and APAs play a prominent role in this tech boom. As sharing economy companies disrupt traditional businesses, however, they face increasing regulatory and litigation challenges. Should on-demand workers be classified as independent contractors or employees? Should older regulations (e.g., rental laws, taxi ordinances) be applied to new technologies? What consumer and privacy protections can users expect with individuals offering their own services? Join us for a lively panel discussion with in-house counsel and law firm attorneys from the tech sector. 2. Panelists Albert Giang Shareholder, Caldwell Leslie & Proctor, PC Albert Giang is a Shareholder at the litigation boutique Caldwell Leslie & Proctor. His practice focuses on technology companies and startups, from advising clients on cutting-edge regulatory issues to defending them in class actions and complex commercial disputes. He is the rare litigator with in-house counsel experience: he has served two secondments with the in-house legal department at Lyft, the groundbreaking peer-to-peer ridesharing company, where he advised on a broad range of regulatory, compliance, and litigation issues. Albert also specializes in appellate litigation, having represented clients in numerous cases in the United States Supreme Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and California appellate courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Libraries in a Sharing Economy: “Ubuntu” As a Professional Leadership Concept From/For Africa, Asia and Oceania, Latin America and the Caribbean
    Submitted on: 25.10.2019 Satellite Meeting: Leadership roles in international librarianship: how can information professionals from Africa, Asia & Oceania, Latin America & Caribbean be part of it? Date: August 20-21, 2019 Location: Bibliotheca Alexandrina, Alexandria, Egypt Transforming libraries in a sharing economy: “Ubuntu” as a professional leadership concept from/for Africa, Asia and Oceania, Latin America and the Caribbean Jose Rodolfo Hernandez-Carrion Department of Applied Economics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. E-mail address: [email protected] Clara M. Chu Mortenson Center for International Library Programs, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, USA. E-mail address: [email protected] Copyright © 2019 by Clara M. Chu and Jose R. Hernandez-Carrion. This work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Abstract: The way that individuals obtain and share information has changed in the current century and libraries need to consider their roles in the context of globalization, social inequality and the digital revolution. The library of today is in a favorable position to expand on its role as one of the original, effective and successful illustrations of a sharing economy. This paper will introduce the sharing economy as a model that provides opportunities for innovation by libraries, resulting in their transformation as leaders, their services to users, and the communities’ use of libraries. First, it will introduce the sharing economy in practice in libraries that are responding to their community’s increasing need to access information resources for everyday information needs with new media and formats that they can’t easily afford, to have free and reliable internet connection, to access computers with licensed software, and to use spaces for meetings, social activities, cultural programs, conference calls, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Reuse Explorations Guide Innovative Programs and Strategies
    Reuse Explorations Guide Innovative Programs and Strategies Written by Athena Lee Bradley and Mary Ann Remolador Northeast Recycling Council, Inc. (NERC) With funding from the Rural Utility Services, United States Department of Agriculture NERC is an equal opportunity provider and employer. August 2016 Acknowledgements The Northeast Recycling Council, Inc. (NERC) is a nonprofit organization that conducts projects in the eleven Northeast states, as well as around the country. Its mission is to promote sustainable materials management by supporting traditional and innovative solid waste best practices, focusing on waste prevention, toxics reduction, reuse, recycling and organics recovery. NERC received a grant from the United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Utility Services for “Innovative Strategies & Best Management Practices for Implementing Reuse Programs in Rural Communities in New York State & the St. Regis Mohawk Nation.” Through the project NERC provided webinars, trainings, resources, and technical assistance. The following individuals and organizations provided invaluable and generous assistance in the development and implementation of the project. NERC would like to extend its appreciation to and acknowledge the following people who worked with NERC on reuse: • Jan M. Oatman, Regional Recycling Coordinator, Development Authority of the North Country • St. Lawrence County Reuse Partnership: John Tenbusch, St. Lawrence County Environmental Management Council; Larry Legault, Operations/Recycling Manager, St. Lawrence County Solid Waste Operations; Chelle Lindahl, Co-Coordinator, Local Living Venture; and, Jennifer Lauzon, New York Department of Environmental Conservation, Region 6 • Larry Thompson, Recycling Coordinator, Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe (Akwesasne) • Catherine (Katie) Liendecker & others with Lyons Falls, New York and Lyons Falls Alive • MaryEllen Etienne, The Reuse Institute • Diane Cohen, Executive Director, Finger Lakes ReUse, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Tool Libraries: Hammering Equity Home Daniel White
    FACT SHEET / NOVEMBER 2020 Tool Libraries: Hammering Equity Home Daniel White What is a Tool Library? This fact sheet was written A tool library is a place where community members can borrow tools for by Daniel White, a student set periods of time for free or at a low cost. It is an example of a “real in the Fighting Inequality sharing economy:” a neighborhood-focused, not-for-profit network where in Buffalo-Niagara class at community members share practical resources in a centralized space. the University at Buffalo There are similar libraries for toys, musical instruments, and other items. Law School. Real sharing economies capitalize on the people-power in communities. Special thanks to Darren They can help address social problems such as income disparity, resource Cotton and Aaron 1 segregation, and political disenfranchisement. Krolikowski of The Tool These resource sharing systems help sidestep top-down institutions such as Library for their assistance. Lowes, Home Depot, Toys R’ Us, and Best Buy that promote financial and All images courtesy of The physical waste, treat people as nothing more than consumers, and cut them Tool Library. off from the informal wisdom of their neighbors and peers.2 Unfortunately, the idea of “the sharing economy” has been coopted by multi-million dollar big businesses such as Airbnb, Uber, and TaskRabbit that do little to improve the quality of life for the entire community over the long term.3 Thus, it is important to emphasize the “real” in “real sharing economies.” Tool libraries and other real sharing economies democratize access to resources and allow community members to cultivate self-sufficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix V4c: Local Economic Development Analysis
    1 APPENDIX V4C: LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS 2 Introduction 3 Purpose 4 This appendix summarizes the background information that informs consideration of alternative 5 strategies for building a robust local economy. Those strategies that are best aligned with Hāmākua’s 6 Community Objectives and most feasible will be included in CDP Chapter IV3: “Build a Robust Local 7 Economy.” 8 Importantly, this appendix is NOT the Hāmākua CDP – it does not establish policy or identify plans of 9 action. Instead, for issues related to local economic development, including agriculture, renewable 10 energy, ecosystem services, the health care industry, the education field, the visitor industry, retail, this 11 appendix does four things: 12 . Outlines existing policy, especially County policy established in the General Plan; 13 . Summarizes related, past planning and studies; 14 . Introduces alternative strategies available to achieve Hāmākua’s community objectives; 15 . Preliminarily identifies feasible strategy directions. 16 In other words, this appendix sets the context for identifying preferred CDP strategies. Existing policy 17 provides the framework in which the CDP is operating, related plans identify complementary initiatives, 18 and alternative strategies introduce the “tool box” from which the CDP can choose the best tools for the 19 CDP Planning Area. 20 This appendix complements Appendices V4A and V4B, which focus on natural and cultural resource 21 management and community building, respectively. In those appendices, issues related to but distinct 22 from economic development are discussed in greater detail, including the preservation of open space 23 and agricultural land, historic preservation, watershed and coastal management, access and trails, 24 cultural centers, land use regulations, infrastructure, housing, human services, schools, parks, and 25 community-based, collaborative action.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the New Sharing Economy
    Exploring the New Sharing Economy APRIL 2015 | WHITE PAPER John Madden Director of Sustainability and Engineering Campus + Community Planning University of British Columbia On behalf of Light House Sustainable Building Centre Prepared for and Funded by the NAIOP Research Foundation. © 2015 NAIOP Research Foundation There are many ways to give to the Foundation and support projects and initiatives that advance the commercial real estate industry. If you would like to do your part in helping this unique and valuable resource, please contact Bennett Gray, senior director, at 703-904-7100, ext. 168, or [email protected]. Requests for funding should be submitted to [email protected]. For additional information, please contact Margarita Foster, NAIOP Research Foundation, 2201 Cooperative Way, Suite 300, Herndon, VA 20171, at 703-904-7100, ext. 117, or [email protected]. Contents Introduction ............................................... 1 What Is the Sharing Economy? ................................. 2 Social Dimensions ....................................... 3 Scale and Design ........................................ 3 An Example: Tool Libraries ................................. 3 Growth ............................................... 4 Key Drivers ............................................ 5 Challenges and Opportunities for Large Companies ............... 6 Transportation and Mobility .................................... 8 Car Sharing ............................................ 8 Bike Sharing ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Access Over Ownership: Case Studies of Libraries of Things
    sustainability Article Access Over Ownership: Case Studies of Libraries of Things Denise Baden 1,* , Ken Peattie 2 and Adekunle Oke 3 1 Southampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK 2 Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UK; peattie@cardiff.ac.uk 3 Aberdeen Business School, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen AB10 7QE, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-(0)23-8059-8966 Received: 31 July 2020; Accepted: 31 August 2020; Published: 2 September 2020 Abstract: Over the last decade there has been increasing interest in the concept of the sharing economy, which replaces the focus on individual ownership with a focus on access to goods and services through borrowing, hiring or sharing. This study investigates the efficacy of extending the library concept to include more items, such as those that are used infrequently. The aim is to explore how Libraries of Things (LoTs) operate and the potential to broaden their appeal, reach and sustainability. This study adopts a multiple case study method to provide a snapshot of six LoTs in the UK. Findings indicate that all LoTs shared common environmental and social values, with the most prevalent values being to use the library concept to reduce resource use and waste and to enable more equitable access to goods. All relied on volunteers and public support, in the form of free or discounted space and none were yet economically self-sufficient. This poses important questions about the future for LoTs and whether they could or even should, transition towards the mainstream to make a more substantive contribution to creating a more socially equitable and environmentally sustainable economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing Economy Jako Ważny Trend W Obszarze Zrównoważonej Konsumpcji
    82 HANDEL WEWNĘTRZNY 2016;5(364):82-91 Barbara Jaros Instytut Ekologii Terenów Uprzemysłowionych – Katowice Sharing economy jako ważny trend w obszarze zrównoważonej konsumpcji Streszczenie Celem rozważań jest przybliżenie problematyki wspólnej konsumpcji jako mo- delu konsumpcji, który w dużej mierze przeciwstawia się tradycyjnemu modelowi konsumpcji opartemu na własności. Istotę sharing economy stanowi współpraca, bezpośrednia lub przy użyciu Internetu. Sharing economy obejmuje takie zacho- wania, jak: dzielenie się, wymiana towarów, pożyczanie, wynajmowanie, ponowne używanie, wolontariat, naprawianie, wspólne kupowanie. Obecnie trudno jedno- znacznie określić, w jakim stopniu sharing economy jest przejawem zrównowa- żonej konsumpcji. Na pewno umożliwia w pewnym zakresie odmaterializowanie sektora konsumpcji i w większym stopniu promowanie usług, jednak wciąż brakuje badań, które pozwoliłyby odpowiedzieć, jaki jest ostateczny wpływ tego typu prak- tyk na środowisko. Należy jednocześnie podkreślić, że sharing economy korzystnie wpływa na podtrzymanie nowoczesnych relacji społecznych oraz kształtowanie wzajemnego zaufania. Artykuł ma charakter przeglądu literatury. Słowa kluczowe: ekonomia współdzielenia się, wspólna konsumpcja, zrównowa- żona konsumpcja. Kody JEL: D10, E21 Wstęp Celem opracowania jest ukazanie potencjalnej roli, jaką ekonomia dzielona, zyskująca coraz większą popularność, może odgrywać w implementacji zrównoważonej konsumpcji. Na wstępie zostaną zdefiniowane pojęcia sharing economy1 oraz zrównoważonej konsump- cji. Sharing
    [Show full text]
  • Berlin Auf Dem Weg Zu Einer Sharing City Potenzialanalyse Der Share Und Collaborative Economy in Berlin
    Von der geteilten zur teilenden Stadt – Berlin auf dem Weg zu einer Sharing City Potenzialanalyse der Share und Collaborative Economy in Berlin POTENZIALANALYSE DER SHARE & COLLABORATIVE ECONOMY IN BERLIN Einleitung ................................................................................................................... 4 Abschnitt I: Kontextualisierung der Share Economy .................................................... 5 Begriffsklärung .............................................................................................................................. 5 1) Kollaborativer Konsum ............................................................................................................... 7 2) Kollaborative Produktion ............................................................................................................ 8 3) Kollaborative Finanzierung ....................................................................................................... 89 4) Kollaboratives Wissen .............................................................................................................. 89 Weltweite Entwicklung der Share & Collaborative Economy ........................................................... 9 Blick in die globale Zukunft ....................................................................................................... 1011 Indikatoren der Share & Collaborative Economy ........................................................................ 1112 Blick in die urbane Zukunft .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]