DOCSLIB.ORG

Vfr Guide for Norway / May 2017 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vfr Guide for Norway / May 2017 1 CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY - NORWAY VFR GUIDE FOR NORWAY / MAY 2017 1. INTRODUCTION Welcome to Norway and Norwegian Airspace! This booklet is made for the purpose of assisting you, as a VFR pilot, in your planning and conduct of flight within Norwegian Airspace. The information relates, in general to Lower Airspace. Lower Airspace is defined as that airspace up to Flight Level 195 (FL195). Pilots of VFR flights within Norwegian you should also bear in mind that the Airspace below FL 195 are invited to environment may suddenly “bite” you consult this guidance material on the during unfavorable flight conditions. understanding that it does not represent During low level flight, obstacles like a substitute for the more comprehensive power spans and masts, some of them information contained in the AIP. In the not or only partly marked, will also pose event of conflicting information in this a significant threat to you and your air- guide, information in the AIP should be craft. regarded as the authoritative source. This booklet tries to raise the awareness Please note that the Norway AIP can be of such unfavorable flight conditions. > viewed at: www.ippc.no Relevant rules and regulations applicable to VFR flights within Norway are covered The vast majority of the Norwegian land and so is other information necessary masses consist of mountainous terrain for safe planning and conduct of flight. with countless valleys and deep fjords. You will enjoy a spectacular scenery and Set your own limitations and prepare for great fun while flying in these areas, but the expected so you do not have to >>> recover from the unexpected! 1 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION _____________________________ 1 VFR-flights under Oslo TMA ___________________26 TABLE OF CONTENTS _______________________ 2 Use of frequency 123.500 ____________________26 AIRCRAFT ENTERING NORWAY __________ 3 Airspace Infringement ________________________27 Aircraft without standard Mandatory Occurrence reporting _____________28 certificate of airworthiness ___________________ 4 The new regulation ____________________________28 Microlight entering Who – is required to report ___________________28 /flying in Norway _______________________________ 5 What – shall be reported ______________________28 ICAO Flight plan________________________________ 5 How – to file a report __________________________28 Mandatory flightplan for ENGM and ENBR ___ 5 How soon – the report must be filed _________29 Slot requirements _____________________________ 6 Why – occurrence reporting __________________29 Parking charges _______________________________ 6 Just Culture ____________________________________29 Animals and pets ______________________________ 6 What will the information be used for ________29 Flights to Svalbard/Spitsbergen ______________ 8 Aeronautical information ______________________29 FLIGHTPLANNING __________________________ 9 EMERGENCIES ______________________________31 Some risk factors ______________________________ 9 Search and Rescue Services (SAR) ___________31 Types of Manuals and Charts SAR helicopters ________________________________31 Available for Norway FIR ______________________10 Use of ELT and Personal Chart updates __________________________________11 Locator Beacon ( PLB) _________________________32 Electronic flight bag ___________________________11 Go/ No-go weather criteria ____________________12 FLIGHTS IN MOUNTAIN AND Visual Meteorological Conditions (VMC) _____13 REMOTES AREAS ____________________________33 Weather minima for Short field operations _________________________35 Special VFR Flights ____________________________13 Balked Landing lights __________________________35 VFR night _______________________________________13 Takeoff _________________________________________36 VFR on top ______________________________________13 Downdrafts _____________________________________36 Pre-flight Met Briefing ________________________14 Windshear _____________________________________37 Autometar ______________________________________14 Wind ____________________________________________38 Fuel Planning __________________________________15 Icing ____________________________________________38 ICAO Flight plan________________________________15 Enroute _________________________________________38 A few points on mountain flying techniques _39 AIRSPACE AND COMMUNICATION _____19 Landing _________________________________________39 Airspace ________________________________________20 Wires ___________________________________________40 Operations in class D Airspace Automatic obstacle warning systems _________41 outside ATC operational hours ________________21 Whiteout and Brightout _______________________41 Radio mandatory zone( RMZ) _________________22 Aerodrome Flight Information OTHER INFORMATION _____________________43 Service (AFIS) __________________________________22 Bird Hazards ___________________________________43 Phraseology at airports Protection of Reindeer against where AFIS is provided ________________________22 Noise from low flying aircraft _________________44 VFR routes inside CTR/TMA ___________________23 Drones __________________________________________44 Cruising levels _________________________________23 Photographing _________________________________45 Prohibited, restricted and danger areas _____24 Use of Intoxicating Liquor, Language requirements _______________________25 Narcotics or Drugs _____________________________45 SSR Transponder ______________________________25 Useful telephone numbers ____________________46 2 3. AIRCRAFT ENTERING NORWAY Aircraft entering or leaving Norway First landing in Norway shall be done at airports where custom services are available. Aircraft entering Norway has to file flightplan at Norwegian least 60 minutes before departure. Private operated INTERNATionaL aircraft with MTOW 5700 kg and a maximum of 10 AerodroMES passengers may also use other airfields, it that case, BERGEN/Flesland a complete ICAO flight plan shall be sent to the FAGERNES/Leirin Directorate of Customs and Excise at the latest 4 HARSTAD/NARVIK/Evenes hours prior entering or leaving Norwegian territory. HAUGESUND/Karmøy AIS/NOTAM may help you to forward a copy of your KIRKENES/Høybuktmoen flight plan to the Directorate of Customs and Excise MOLDE/Årø upon request. MOSS/Rygge NARVIK/Framnes If stated arrival/departure times has to be changed, OSLO/Gardermoen the Directorate of Customs and Excise shall be notified RØROS ASAP: Fax: (+47) 22 86 08 00 or [email protected] SANDEFJORD/Torp STAVANGER/Sola Aircraft shall not depart before the time stated in the TROMSØ/Langnes FPL without prior permission from the Customs service. TRONDHEIM/Værnes Persons who arrive with the aircraft shall not leave ÅLESUND/Vigra the aircraft prior to the arrival time stated in the FPL. BODØ KRISTIANSAND/Kjevik Goods carried on board shall not be removed from SVALBARD/Longyear arrived aircraft prior to the arrival time stated in the FPL. Aircraft shall only carry goods which: 1. Can be imported/exported free of tax and toll according to existing rules of exceptions from these Regulations, 2. Are not included in the import/export restrictions, and not require clearance. 3 3.1 Aircraft without standard certificate of airworthiness In accordance with European Civil Avia- The application shall contain the follow- tion Council (ECAC) recommendation ing information: INT.S/11-1 Norway accepts flights over 1. Name, address, phone/telefax and Norwegian territory by homebuilt aircraft e-mail of the Operator with a Non Standard Certificate of Air- 2. Purpose of the flight worthiness or a “permit to fly” issued by 3. Area of planned operations the Civil Aviation Authority of another 4. Timeframe of operations ECAC member state. 5. Documentation of airworthiness (copy of permit to fly with flight The flight test program must be com- restrictions and flight conditions) pleted. Aircraft from other than ECAC member states not holding a stand- 6. Certificate of registration ard certificate of airworthiness or oper- 7. Valid maintenance documentation ated on a “permit to fly must apply for a 8. Relevant pages of flight manual prior permission to operate within (Information which verify flight Norwegian airspace. manual for this particular aircraft) 9. Certificate of Insurance Permission may be obtained from Civil > Aviation Authority - Norway by ordinary mail or e-mail to [email protected] 4 3.2 Microlight entering done via www.ippc.no / flying in Norway > A flight plan may also be filed by phone to the national AIS/NOTAM office located In order to cross the border and fly mi- at ENGM, tel. (+47) 64 81 90 00. crolight in Norway, you will need a permis- sion from from Civil Aviation Authority – When calling, be sure to have your com- Norway. pleted FPL handy and ready to read to the AIS-operator. The FPL should be Permission may be obtained from Civil delivered within Norway: 60 minutes > Aviation Authority - Norway by ordinary prior to ETD. mail or e-mail to [email protected] A complete flight plan is mandatory for: The application shall contain the follow- • All flights when a national border ing information: crossing is required. 1. Name, address, phone/telefax and • All flights within EN-R402 e-mail of the Operator (Finnmark). 2. Purpose of the flight • All flights where Search and Rescue 3. Area of planned operations (SAR) is requested. 4. Timeframe of operations 5. Certificate of registration 3.4 Mandatory flightplan 6. Certificate of Airworthiness for ENGM and ENBR 7. Valid maintenance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NORWAY LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview
    LSSIP 2020 - NORWAY LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2020 for Norway Info Centre Reference 20/12/22/79 Date of Edition 07/04/2021 LSSIP Focal Point Peder BJORNESET - [email protected] Luftfartstilsynet (CAA-Norway) LSSIP Contact Person Luca DELL’ORTO – [email protected] EUROCONTROL/NMD/INF/PAS LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for EUROCONTROL Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Reference Documents LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Edition 2020 implementation-plan-level-3 Master Plan Level 3 – Report https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Year 2020 implementation-report-level-3 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor National AIP https://avinor.no/en/ais/aipnorway/ FAB Performance Plan https://www.nefab.eu/docs# LSSIP Year 2020 Norway Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2020 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2020. Stakeholder / Name Position Signature and date Organisation
    [Show full text]
  • VFR-Guide Vår 2009.Indd
    2009 VFR-guide Written by Sverre H. Falkenberg Updated by Avinor and Norwegian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) - 2009 Photos by Anders Hamre, Anders Forseth and Thomas Hytten Questions about this publication may be directed to: Luftfartstilsynet/ Norwegian Civil Aviation Auhority Allmennfl yseksjon / General Avation Section P.O.Box 243 N-8003 BODØ NORWAY Tel. +47 75 58 50 00 Fax. +47 75 58 50 05 Be aware that the information given is for guidance only and that there may have been up- dates since this guide was published. Pilots are individually responsible for keeping them- selves posted on all current regulations within the area. They are also responsible for all actions taken before and while operating in Norwegian area. Introduction Welcome to Norway and Norwegian Airspace! This booklet is made for the purpose of assisting you, as a VFR pilot, in your planning and conduct of fl ight within Norwegian Airspace. The vast majority of the Norwegian land masses consist of mountainous terrain with countless valleys and deep fj ords. You will enjoy a spectacular scenery and great fun while fl ying in these areas, but you should also bear in mind that the environment may suddenly “bite” you during un- favourable fl ight conditions. This booklet tries to raise the awareness of such unfavourable fl ight conditions. Relevant rules and regulations applicable to VFR fl ights within Norway are covered and so is other information necessary for safe planning and conduct of fl ight. Set your own limitations and prepare for the expected so you do not
    [Show full text]
  • TCAS II) by Personnel Involved in the Implementation and Operation of TCAS II
    Preface This booklet provides the background for a better understanding of the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS II) by personnel involved in the implementation and operation of TCAS II. This booklet is an update of the TCAS II Version 7.0 manual published in 2000 by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). It describes changes to the CAS logic introduced by Version 7.1 and updates the information on requirements for use of TCAS II and operational experience. Version 7.1 logic changes will improve TCAS Resolution Advisory (RA) sense reversal logic in vertical chase situations. In addition all “Adjust Vertical Speed, Adjust” RAs are converted to “Level-Off, Level-Off” RAs to make it more clear that a reduction in vertical rate is required. The Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS) for TCAS II Version 7.1 were approved in June 2008 and Version 7.1 units are expected to be operating by 2010-2011. Version 6.04a and 7.0 units are also expected to continue operating for the foreseeable future where authorized. 2 Preface................................................................................................................................. 2 The TCAS Solution............................................................................................................. 5 Early Collision Avoidance Systems................................................................................ 5 TCAS II Development .................................................................................................... 6 Initial
    [Show full text]
  • Forvaltningsplan for Rørvikvågen Fuglefredningsområde, Giske Kommune
    Fylkesmannen i Møre og Romsdal Miljøvernavdelinga Forvaltningsplan for Rørvikvågen fuglefredningsområde, Giske kommune Rapport 2012: 08 Forsidefoto: Beiting har lange tradisjoner i Rørvikvågen fuglefredningsområde, og i dag benyttes både storfe og hest i denne nyttige skjøtselen av kulturlandskapet. Foto: Dag Holtan. 2 Samarbeidende konsulent: Kontaktperson: ISBN 978-82-7430-255-6 (nett) Dag Holtan Dag Holtan ISSN 1891-876X Oppdragsgiver: Kontaktpersoner hos År: 2012 oppdragsgiver: Fylkesmannen i Møre og Romsdal, miljøvernavdelinga Asbjørn Børset, Ola Betten Referanse: Forvaltningsplan for Rørvikvågen fuglefredningsområde i Giske kommune, Møre og Romsdal. Fylkesmannen i Møre og Romsdal, miljøvernavdelinga, rapport 2012-08. 46 s. Referat: Det er utarbeidet forvaltningsplan for Rørvikvågen fuglefredningsområde i Giske kommune, Møre og Romsdal. Fuglefredningsområdet omfatter en ganske beskyttet bukt med et relativt stort gruntvannsareal, samt en del landareal som er av stor betydning for både hekkende, trekkende og overvintrende fugler, dels også enkelte sjeldne karplanter og beitemarksopper. Viktige naturtyper i fuglefredningsområdet (jf. DN-håndbok nr. 13) er ulike utforminger av myr og ferskvannspåvirkede enger, uten at det er påvist truede vegetasjonstyper. Det er viktig å finne en balanse mellom ulike interesser, bl.a. knyttet til landbruksdrift. Det er utarbeidet bevaringsmål som særlig fokuserer på bevaring av vegetasjonstyper, dessuten at området fremdeles skal være hekkeplass for en rekke sentrale fuglearter. Samtidig foreslås konkret
    [Show full text]
  • EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol
    AIP NETHERLANDS AD 2.EHAM-1 04 FEB 2016 EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol EHAM AD 2.1 AERODROME LOCATION INDICATOR AND NAME EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol EHAM AD 2.2 AERODROME GEOGRAPHICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DATA 1 ARP co-ordinates and site at AD 52°18'29"N 004°45'51"E 062 DEG GEO 135 m from TWR. 2 Direction and distance from (city) 4.9 NM SW of Amsterdam. 3 Elevation/reference temperature -11 ft AMSL/20.4°C (JUL). 4 Geoid undulation at AD ELEV PSN 142 ft. 5 MAG VAR/annual change 0°E (2010)/8'E. 6 AD operator, postal address, telephone, telefax, Post: Amsterdam Airport Schiphol email, AFS, website P.O. Box 7501 1118 ZG Schiphol-Centre Tel: +31 (0)20 601 9111 (Airport all EXT) +31 (0)20 601 2116 (Airport office/Apron Management Service) +31 (0)20 601 2115 (Airport Authority) Fax: +31 (0)20 604 1475 AFS: EHAMYDYX 7 Types of traffic permitted (IFR/VFR) IFR/VFR 8 Remarks 1. Airport for use by national and international civil air transport with all types of aircraft. 2. Upon request, contact the airside operations manager (AOM) on channel 130.480 call sign "Airport One" (not monitored H24). 3. Changes in the availability of the runway and taxiway infrastructure at the airport will be promulgated by NOTAM. The NOTAM can refer to the website http://www.eham.aero where visual material relating to this subject will be shown. This material may only be used in combination with the current NOTAM. EHAM AD 2.3 OPERATIONAL HOURS 1 AD operator H24 2 Customs and immigration H24 3 Health and sanitation H24 4 AIS briefing office H24 self-briefing Tel: +31 (0)20 406 2315 +31 (0)20 406 2316 Fax: +31 (0)20 648 4417 5 ATS reporting office (ARO) H24 Tel: +31 (0)20 406 2315 +31 (0)20 406 2316 +31 (0)20 406 2323 Fax: +31 (0)20 648 4417 6 MET briefing office H24 7 ATS H24 8 Fuelling Schiphol-Centre: H24.
    [Show full text]
  • Countywide Airspace Usage
    A PPENDIX I Countywide Airspace Usage Riverside County is within one of the busiest and most complex sections of airspace in the United States, handling over 4.3 million operations annually. To better understand the magnitude of these op- erations and complexities of this system, Map 1 depicts Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations for the six busiest airports in the area for a 24-hour period on January 26, 1996. This exhibit does not depict operations from the 14 airports in Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan update. AIRSPACE STRUCTURE Since the advent of aviation, nations have established procedures within their boundaries to regulate the use of airspace. Airspace is broadly classified as either “controlled” or “uncontrolled” in the United States. The difference between the two categories relates primarily to requirements for pilot qualifica- tions, ground-to-air communications, navigation and traffic services, and weather conditions. Six classes of airspace have been designated in the United States. Airspace designated as Class A, B, C, D, or E is considered controlled airspace. Aircraft operating within controlled airspace are subject to vary- ing requirements for positive air traffic control. The airspace in Riverside County, as illustrated on Map 2, is constantly occupied by aircraft arriving and departing from other airports in the region. Frequently, overflights experienced in communities near Riverside County airports are not the result of operations at nearby airports, but from aircraft us- ing airports outside Riverside County. After the preparation of this plan, additional approaches have been established for aircraft arriving at Los Angeles International Airport. These new approaches were not included as part of the map development process for this plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA)
    Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA) EASA eRules: aviation rules for the 21st century Rules and regulations are the core of the European Union civil aviation system. The aim of the EASA eRules project is to make them accessible in an efficient and reliable way to stakeholders. EASA eRules will be a comprehensive, single system for the drafting, sharing and storing of rules. It will be the single source for all aviation safety rules applicable to European airspace users. It will offer easy (online) access to all rules and regulations as well as new and innovative applications such as rulemaking process automation, stakeholder consultation, cross-referencing, and comparison with ICAO and third countries’ standards. To achieve these ambitious objectives, the EASA eRules project is structured in ten modules to cover all aviation rules and innovative functionalities. The EASA eRules system is developed and implemented in close cooperation with Member States and aviation industry to ensure that all its capabilities are relevant and effective. Published December 20201 1 The published date represents the date when the consolidated version of the document was generated. Powered by EASA eRules Page 2 of 213| Dec 2020 Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules Disclaimer of the Air (SERA) DISCLAIMER This version is issued by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) in order to provide its stakeholders with an updated and easy-to-read publication. It has been prepared by putting together the officially published regulations with the related acceptable means of compliance and guidance material (including the amendments) adopted so far.
    [Show full text]
  • Kartlegging Av Naturtypar I Giske Kommune
    Kartlegging av naturtypar i Giske kommune Rapport av Dag Holtan Forsidebilete: 1. Purpurmarihand, Molnes 2. Strandkål, Alnes 3. Engmarihand, Rørvikvågen 4. Sandstarr, Rørvikvatnet Fotograf Dag Holtan FØREORD Forvaltning av natur har tidlegare i særleg grad vore eit statleg ansvar, men kommunane vil no gradvis få ein større del av dette ansvaret. Etter at Noreg slutta seg til Konvensjonen om biologisk mangfald i 1993 har Stortinget bestemt at alle norske kommunar skal gjennomføra ei kartlegging av viktige naturtypar for å styrka vedtaksgrunnlaget i det lokale planarbeidet, jf. St. meld. nr. 58 (1996-97) og St. meld. nr. 42 (2000-2001). Første runde av dette arbeidet går no mot slutten både i Møre og Romsdal og resten av landet. Giske kommune har motteke statleg tilskot til dette arbeidet. Denne rapporten er laga på oppdrag av Giske kommune av biolog Dag Holtan. Rapporten er basert dels på samanstilling av kjent kunnskap og dels på innsamling av ny kunnskap gjennom feltarbeid og kontakt med folk. Materialet er systematisert etter ein fast metodikk som gjeld for heile landet. Det er meininga at rapporten skal kunne brukast som eit kunnskapsgrunnlag i både offentleg og privat planlegging. Forfattaren ønskjer å takka alle som har bidratt med opplysningar, både lokalt og elles. Sjøholt 16.01.2004 Dag Holtan prosjektansvarleg 1 INNHALD FØREORD ....................................................................................................................................1 INNHALD ......................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Årsmelding 2018 - 2019
    ___________________________________ ÅRSMELDING 2018 - 2019 Sjømannskirken i San Francisco, dit regionen sendte ut Morgan Berg i 2019. REGION MØRE 1. OMRÅDE Bispedømme: Møre Region (fylker): Møre og Romsdal 2. REGIONSTYRET Leder: Peder Nedrelid Medlemmer: Per Arne Gausdal, Marit Veddegjerde, Hilde-Karin Torgersen, Synnøve Breivik, Jenny Kolflåth Varamedlemmer: - 3. NOMINASJONSKOMITÉEN Leder: Inge Morten Haarstad Medlemmer: Per Arne Gausdal, Solveig Løvik Varamedlemmer: Elsa Torske 4. MEDLEMMER– ARRANGEMENT 2016 2017 2018 2019 Foreningsmedlemmer pr 93 94 97 100 31.12 Individuelle medlemmer 56 56 57 57 pr 31.12 Totalt antall medlemmer 149 150 154 157 Antall arrangement 13 8 11 8 Møter med mennesker 3233 3337 3603 6049 Antall faste givere i 302 321 540 611 regionen (FølgesVenner) Giverbeløp fra 381 076 428 055 512 250 Kr 601 800 FølgesVenner totalt 5. FORENINGER Det er totalt 20 registrerte sjømannskirkeforeninger i Møre pr 31. desember 2019: SJØMANNSKIRKEFORENING FORENINGSLEDER STED Bølgen sjømannskirkeforening Liv Ertesvåg ULSTEINVIK Doggdropen kvinneforening Marit Veddgjerde HADDAL Dravlausbygda Solveig Berit Haugsmyr LAUVSTAD sjømannskirkeforening Løvik Duggdråpen Hilde Karin Torgersen NERLANDSØY sjømannskirkeforening Eide kontakt for Sjømannskirken Petter Eide EIDSDAL Engesetdalen og Fylling Kirsti Strand SKODJE kvinneforening Hanembygda Målfrid Bølset MEISINGSET sjømannskirkeforening Lepsøy sjømannskirkeforening Heidi Kartveit Seth KJERSTAD Lyngblomsten Elsa Torske SMØLA sjømannskirkeforening Nesjestrand - SKÅLA sjømannskirkeforening
    [Show full text]
  • FSF ALAR Briefing Note 3.2 -- Altitude Deviations
    Flight Safety Foundation Approach-and-landing Accident Reduction Tool Kit FSF ALAR Briefing Note 3.2 — Altitude Deviations Altitude deviations may result in substantial loss of aircraft • The pilot-system interface: vertical separation or horizontal separation, which could cause – Altimeter setting, use of autopilot, monitoring of a midair collision. instruments and displays; or, Maneuvers to avoid other aircraft often result in injuries to • The pilot-controller interface: passengers, flight crewmembers and, particularly, to cabin crewmembers. – Communication loop (i.e., the confirmation/ correction process). Statistical Data Altitude deviations occur usually as the result of one or more of the following conditions: An analysis by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and by USAir (now US Airways) of altitude-deviation events1 • The controller assigns an incorrect altitude or reassigns showed that: a flight level after the pilot was cleared to an altitude; • Approximately 70 percent of altitude deviations were the • Pilot-controller communication breakdown — mainly result of a breakdown in pilot-controller communication; readback/hearback errors such as the following: and, – Controller transmits an incorrect altitude, the pilot • Nearly 40 percent of altitude deviations resulted when does not read back the altitude and the controller does air traffic control (ATC) assigned 10,000 feet and the not challenge the absence of a readback; flight crew set 11,000 feet in the selected-altitude – Pilot reads back an incorrect altitude, but the window, or when ATC assigned 11,000 feet and the flight controller does not hear the erroneous readback and crew set 10,000 feet in the selected-altitude window. does not correct the pilot’s readback; or, Defining Altitude Deviations – Pilot accepts an altitude clearance intended for another aircraft (confusion of call signs); An altitude deviation is a deviation from the assigned altitude • Pilot receives, understands and reads back the correct (or flight level) equal to or greater than 300 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Icao Definitions Flight Procedures Icao Rules Of
    22 AUG08 AIRTRAFFICCONTROL 1 INTRODUCTION This AirTrafficControlSectionisdesignedtoprovide pilots with InternationalCivil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Standards, Recommended Practicesand P rocedures forinternational operations.Inaddition, on astate-by-statebasis,flightproceduresuniquetoeachstate,ordifferent from thepublishedICAOrules andprocedures, areincluded. Each part of this AirTraffic ControlSection is describedbelow. ICAODEFINITIONS durespage.Ifthe state hasexceptions to thepub- Thesedefinitions areapplicable to theICAOinfor- lishedholding tables, acomplete tabulation of hold- mation contained in this ATCsection andhavebeen ing speeds is provided. extractedfromappropriateICAOpublications. PROCEDURE LIMITATIONS AND OPTIONS FLIGHT PROCEDURES Statementsconcerning conformance with ICAO Details of thePANS-OPS instrumentdepartureand PANS-OPS areincludedhere. The latestversion approach procedure informationusefultothe pilot-in- of PANS-OPS,VolumeIis provided in theICAO commandinthe execution of an instrument departure Flight Procedures chapter. Thestatement “Instru- or approach procedureare included. Theinformation ment Procedures areinconformancewith thenew is extractedfromthe latestamended edition of Pro- PANS-OPS Document8168,VolumeII” indicates ceduresfor AirNavigation Services—Aircraft Oper- compliance with this document. ations, Document 8168, VolumeI,FlightProcedures. Procedurelimitations, non-standard circling pro- References to earliereditionsare included. tectedarea, airspeedrestrictions, andsimilartype informationisincluded.Significantstatedifferences
    [Show full text]
  • Master's Degree Thesis
    Master’s degree thesis LOG950 Logistics Investigating air transports effect on regional economic development, in a Norwegian context. André Ree Number of pages including this page: 148 Molde, 23.05.2016 Mandatory statement Each student is responsible for complying with rules and regulations that relate to examinations and to academic work in general. The purpose of the mandatory statement is to make students aware of their responsibility and the consequences of cheating. Failure to complete the statement does not excuse students from their responsibility. Please complete the mandatory statement by placing a mark in each box for statements 1-6 below. 1. I/we hereby declare that my/our paper/assignment is my/our own work, and that I/we have not used other sources or received other help than mentioned in the paper/assignment. 2. I/we hereby declare that this paper Mark each 1. Has not been used in any other exam at another box: department/university/university college 1. 2. Is not referring to the work of others without acknowledgement 2. 3. Is not referring to my/our previous work without acknowledgement 3. 4. Has acknowledged all sources of literature in the text and in the list of references 4. 5. Is not a copy, duplicate or transcript of other work 5. I am/we are aware that any breach of the above will be considered as cheating, and may result in annulment of the 3. examination and exclusion from all universities and university colleges in Norway for up to one year, according to the Act relating to Norwegian Universities and University Colleges, section 4-7 and 4-8 and Examination regulations section 14 and 15.
    [Show full text]