Nong2019.Pdf (1.651Mb)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. The Ideal of Religious Purification: A Critical Enquiry into Hume’s two Concepts of True Religion Yongguang Nong PhD by Research in Philosophy The University of Edinburgh 2019 TO MY PARENTS AND MY LOVE 1 Table of Contents Declaration………………………………………………………………………………….6 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………….7 Abstract…………………………..…………………………………………………………8 Lay Summary………………………………………...…………………………………….9 Abbreviations……………………………………………………………………..………11 Introduction From Religious Criticism to True Religion……………………...…12 0.1 Hume’s Image as a Religious Critic…………………………………..12 0.2 True Religion and the Setting of the Dialogues……………………...15 0.3 Claims and Overview of the Dissertation…………………………….17 0.4 Methodology……………………………………………………………..21 0.5 Contributions and Limitations………………………………….………21 Chapter 1 Hume’s True religion: Genuine or Tactical? The Negative Readings and their Difficulties………………………………………………….…...23 1.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………….23 1.2 The Ironical Readings: Mossner and Price…………………………...24 1.3 The Reconciliatory Readings…………………………………………..29 A. Reconciliation between Hume and the Orthodox: Millican, John and Manning………………………………………………………….31 B. Reconciliation between Philo and Cleanthes: O’Connor…………33 C. Reconciliation between Hume and the Moderates: Penelhum….35 1.4 The Deconstructive Readings: Smith, Flew and Zhou………………38 2 1.5 Hume’s Sincerity: A demonstration……………………………………41 1.6 Summary and Conclusion………………………………………………47 Chapter 2 What is True? The Theistic Readings and their Limitations……...49 2.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………..49 2.2 The Weak Theistic Readings……………………………………………49 A. Gaskin: “Attenuated Deism”…………………………………………50 B. Penelhum and Sessions: “Minimal Deism”………………………..55 C. Livingston and Yoder: “Philosophical Theism”……………………56 D. Immerwahr: “Aesthetic Theism”…………………………………….59 E. Willis: Basic Theism, Moderate Hope and Practical Morality……61 2.3 The Limitations of the Weak Theistic Readings………………………62 2.4 The Strong Theistic Readings…………………………………………..63 A. Pike: Deism from the “Irregular Argument”……………………..…63 B. Nathan’s “Immanent God”…………………………………………..65 C. Hamann’s Fideistic Reading………………………………………..68 D. Hardy’s Calvinistic Reading…………………………………………71 2.5 Hume’s Fideistic Accounts: A new explanation…………..…………...73 2.6 Summary and Conclusion……………………………………………….75 Chapter 3 Two Versions of True Religion: For the Learned and for the Vulgar...................................................................................................77 3.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………..77 3.2 Hume’s Description of False Religion………………………………….78 3.3 The Features of Philo’s True Religion………………………………….82 3 3.4 The Features of Cleanthes’ True Religion……………………………..86 3.5 The Learned and the Vulgar: The Basis for Hume’s Distinction…….93 3.6 Summary and Conclusion…………………………………………..….101 Chapter 4 Minimized Theology: On Philo’s True Religion…………………….103 4.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………103 4.2 Natural Theology: the Regular and Irregular argument…………….104 4.3 The Rareness and Thinness of Philo’s True Religion………………109 4.4 “Remote Probability”: The Epistemological Basis…………………...116 4.5 True Religion as an Application of Moderate Scepticism………..…123 4.6 Summary and Conclusion………………………………………….…..129 Chapter 5 Regulated Popular Religion: On Cleanthes’ True Religion………130 5.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………….130 5.2 The Negative and Positive Sides of Popular Religion……………….131 5.3 The Corruptions of Popular Religion…………………………………..137 5.4 The “Proper Office” of Popular Religion……………………………….142 5.5 The Morality of Popular Religion: A Reconsideration……………..…147 5.6 Summary and Conclusion………………………………………………153 Chapter 6 Hume’s Approaches towards the Realisation of True Religion…154 6.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………….154 6.2 A Philosophical Cure…………………………………………………….155 6.3 An Ideal State Church…………………………………………………..162 6.4 Historical Education and the Progress of Moral Taste………………169 4 6.5 Summary and Conclusion……………………………………………....172 Chapter 7 Hume’s Pragmatic Concern and its Implications…………………..174 7.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………….174 7.2 Hume’s Pragmatic Concern on True Religion………………………..175 7.3 Pragmatic Concern and True Religion in the Enlightenment……….178 7.4 Hume’s True Religion in a Present-day Context……………………..182 7.5 Summary and Conclusion………………………………………………188 REFERENCES……………..………………………………………………….…………189 5 Declaration I, Yongguang Nong, hereby declare the following. The present thesis, submitted for examination in pursuit of a PhD by Research in Philosophy, has been entirely composed by myself, and it has not been submitted in pursuit of any other academic degree, or professional qualification. Signature: Date: 6 Acknowledgements During the course of the writing of this thesis, I received generous help from many people without whom this endeavour would never have been possible. First, I would like to thank my supervisors, Duncan Pritchard and Alasdair Richmond, for their academic guidance, patience and support in the last three years. Their careful comments and encouragement have been essential for the completion of this dissertation. Many thanks also to Professor James Harris, Professor Gordon Graham, Professor David Fergusson, Professor Stewart Brown, Doctor Andre Willis and Doctor Margaret Watkins for their insightful comments on the early drafts of the thesis. I am pleased to offer my gratitude to the organizers and participants of the Bucharest Graduate Conference in Early Modern Philosophy held by Bucharest University in April 2017, and to the Scottish Philosophy Conference held by the Princeton Theological Seminary in March 2018. I deeply thank my family members, especially my parents, for their kind understanding, support and love throughout my years away from home. I am also indebted to Professor Xiangchen Sun, Professor Hui Lin, Professor Chong Hou and Professor Zhibin Xie, whose encouragement and assistance helped me to make the decision to leave China and study Hume’s philosophy in his own university. Special thanks are given to Jasmin Gerhäußer, who inspired me in our many deep and productive conversations, and who spent considerable time in helping me to revise this thesis. I must also thank my close friends Ju Wang, Jingjing Gong, Jianpeng Chen and Li Zou among others for their great company over the last years. Apart from the lovely people mentioned above, this research is generously sponsored by the joint scholarship by the China Scholarship Council (CSC) and Edinburgh University. Many thanks for their financial assistance, which ensured that this project went smoothly. I am grateful to the staff of PPLS for their help in many aspects of my academic activities over the years of study. My sincere thanks to all of you. 7 Abstract This thesis explores the implications of Hume’s puzzling concept of true religion. The existing literature tends to either take it as entirely tactical or to read it from a theistic perspective. Focusing mainly on the Dialogues, this dissertation takes another route, arguing that while Hume is serious about the notion of true religion, his concern is pragmatic rather than theistic. The central argument is that Hume has, in fact, provided two very different versions of true religion in the Dialogues: Philo’s version is a minimized theology for “the learned”, while Cleanthes proposes an ideal of regulated popular religion for “the vulgar”. Overall, Hume attempts to find a proper position for religion in a modern society by restricting theology to a limited academic sphere and regulating the priestly power under the civil authority. In particular, Chapters 1 and 2 investigate the arguments and difficulties of the atheistic and theistic readings of Hume’s true religion, showing that true religion is likely to be Hume’s own idea and that his concern about the topic is secular in nature. Chapter 3 presents a textual reading of the statements of true religion by Philo and Cleanthes in the Dialogues, suggesting that their differences originate from Hume’s distinction between “the learned” and “the vulgar”, which is of great significance in his philosophy, as well as throughout his personal life. Chapters 4 and 5 explore the implications of Philo’s and Cleanthes’ concept of true religion respectively, showing that the former admits to a limited form of theism that rests on an epistemological “remote probability”, while the latter explores the potential benefits of popular religion in the moral and political sphere. Chapter 6 reconstructs three approaches to achieving the ideal of true religion from Hume’s texts: a philosophical cure, a tolerant state church, and historical education for the progress